I haven't seen Toy Story for so I'm not sure I am Dr Cooley, director of Toy Story four.

And I'm Mark Nielsen, one of the producers on Toy Story for today.

We're here to discuss some toy story for fan theories that we found on the Internet.

Okay.

Oh, Whoa.

This is Reddit.

User Silo.

Lamb has a theory about four key.

What if Woody is the reason that for Qi became alive and not Bonnie?

Woody is the 1st 1 to touch the trash.

That would become four key.

So you could consider that what he wanted for key to be a toy like him for Bonnie.

Also the whole movie.

Woody is worried sick for four Key, as if he knows for key is alive because of him.

The fact that when he pulls the traf supplies out of the garbage can places it in front of Bonnie Silo.

Lam thinks that that may be what He had this plan all along, but he didn't.

He just wanted to get some craft supplies back in front of Bonnie.

And then later on, he does see how much for key means to Bonnie.

So he is trying to take care of Four Key and bring him back to buying the whole time.

Theo.

Toys in Toy Story are immortal.

They can't die.

I mean, they can be crushed or incinerated, but they will never die of old age.

So what does this mean for our heroes?

They will outlive every owner.

They have a story of anti growing up and leaving their lives will continue ad nauseum until the last of humanity is gone or the toys have all been incinerated.

The torture toys in the first movie are still alive, albeit horribly mangled.

They are stuck like that forever, or until Sid cleans his room, throws him into the garbage can and sends them to their fiery death.

This also means that the only way they can die it's kicking and screaming into something that will destroy their entire body.

If pieces then still exists.

They're still aware we've seen this with Mr Potato Head.

He's able to feel and used his body parts when they're away from him.

Their soul may reside somewhere in the head then, or if there is no head than their central mass.

Now what does this mean for mankind?

Well, it means that once we're all dead or gone, the toys and earthy, that's impossible, right?

I kind of buy that.

I think I think nameless 88 is onto something.

One of things I've heard is that maybe the toys are some sort of vampire that instead of sucking blood, they suck the joy out of Children live for.

But you know, we never really thought about that when making the movie.

It's more about just family, and being friends will be there for him together.

John Negroni, who was known online for creating the theory that all Pixar movies Air Connected, also has a theory about Andy's mom and his mom is Emily.

That's Jessie's previous owner.

You remember the story of Jesse.

Her owner, Emily, grew up with her much the same as she was with Andy.

She was incredibly loved, but Emily eventually gave her away.

When she grew older, I compiled all of the evidence, and I found some incredible support for this theory.

For one thing, take a close look at Andy's cowboy hat and take a close look at Jessie's hat.

It's the same red hat with white lace than Andy wears.

If I got this correct, he's saying that that Jessie's owner is Andy's mom.

Yes, that is the theory, because they have the same color hat.

Red hat.

It's all about the red hat.

Uh, I'm not convinced yet.

I believe there's more than one red hat in the world, but we would love to know more about your incredible support, this theory.

So please contact Mark Nielsen.

No, you know what?

Negative rejected.

All right, Reddit user.

Just a typical Ginger has a theory about Andy's dad.

Good name.

My theory is that Andy's father is dead, and he has clearly attached himself to Woody and Buzz in all of the placing.

One could almost call them fatherly.

This could employ the Andy is missing a father figure in his life, and this is why they're his favorite to toys.

This being said, it doesn't answer the question of why there is no photos of Andy's dad anywhere in their house.

Well, I will say that the reason that you're feeling this way is because we treated Woody as a father figure to Andy throughout all the films in terms of his dad, though I know being dead.

That's taking it pretty far.

I'd like to think maybe they split up, Um, maybe still alive, living somewhere in another town.

Witness protection.

Maybe.

Maybe he was part of the C I.

A.

Is deep undercover.

Maybe Woody belong to Andy's dad, and he gave him Andy before he left.

Maybe he left under suspicious circumstances.

Any of those are possible.

We don't need to know because it's really all about serving the story of Woody playing the father figure in Andy's life.

I don't know about witness protection that much, but I know that you don't talk about it.

And so we didn't talk about it.

I mean, it's kind of obvious he's in witness protection.

Scifi dot com has a theory about the symbolism behind Woody and Buzz.

What if Woody represents anti Israel dad more Andy's dad, while Buzz represents his cool step?

That could be Although, Yeah, we don't see the step Dad, do we?

He's that cool.

I think he's just probably I got a motorcycle somewhere for most of the movie.

Just being cool.

I feel like the step dad would be present in the family if that was indeed the case unless the step dad took off after and his dad went into the witness protection program, his dad left.

It's cool step Dad left on a motorcycle.

Who knows who else took off on Andy?

So Okay, Reddit user Jimmy Legs, 50 has a theory about Toy Story and the TV show The Walking Dead.

The zombie show has many similar similarities to the Toy Story films, including a sheriff who has a kid he would do anything for and who leads a group of social misfits, a hyper macho best friend.

There's also a yodeling cowgirl and a lot so like psychopath like the governor in the TV show.

I've heard of this theory before.

It's actually a pretty incredible coincidence you have.

This question might be more for the walking dead creators than then for us, right?

I mean, which came first.

I feel like Toy Story might have come to mind, having twist raking first, so Hey, Jimmy legs 50.

You should contact walking dead dot com.

See what this Give those guys a call.

What if Boo from Monsters, Inc is Bonnie from Toy Story three.

Whoa, it's blowing my mind.

We actually have a character that we put in Toy Story four that has been confused by many fans as being as she's in the kindergarten scene.

When four keys being created and she's in the background, she has a pink shirt and pigtails, and then right at the carnival, she loses.

She's losing right before you pan up to Ducky and meet them.

Maybe just because it's a younger girl and then Bonnie is a little bit older.

So that's my baby connection they're going for.

But unfortunately, not help.

All things were tough for me to buy it.

There's lots of little kids and an older kids in life, and they're not all related.

But we did accidentally put Boo in movie twice.

Reddit User 1337 and zero Twister in Home Improvement are in the same universe.

You can see a Binford tool box in Toy Story, which is the name of the tool company from Tim Allen's show Home Improvement.

Right there is a Binford tool box that is on top of the crate that Buzz is under and the first toy story.

I don't know that it was Maur than a nod to Tim Allen.

Maybe that's who.

Andy's dad is in the Tool man Taylor.

Oh wow.

Which would explain a lot.

Reddit user London garbage man who has a theory that troublemaker said may have changed his ways in Toy Story once it is confronted with a horrifying revelation that his toys are alive 15 years later in Toy Story three, we see that Sid has become the local garbage man.

Now let's imagine you're a guy who's just learned that inanimate objects are alive.

What job would you get?

It isn't working a crappy job.

He's trying to save them.

He's trying to save the toys.

He picked the one job where you can rescue those things and sit is uniquely equipped to fix those toys that he finds that are broken.

He's pretty darn creative.

Yeah, I agree.

Happy Child.

I think cities like probably the most creative child in all of the Toy Story movies since a good It's a great just misunderstood.

Yeah, Andy, was Andy doing wasn't doing Sit is the one that was really had a vision, and he's cleaning up the streets, which is great.

R M a 2910 may have figured out the ending to the movie would.

He has given Bonnie Love Joy, et cetera, and is chilled out with buzz and friends.

But there's something he is really missing and kind of lax off love.

What would be more emotional than Woody saying goodbye to buzz and company?

And now he wants to be independent.

Oh, I see.

So this was written before they saw.

Yes, we went through a lot of different endings for Toy Story, For the person we had was, everybody came back to Bonnie's house and everything was normal as usual.

But it wasn't emotional enough.

We had another ending where Bo didn't come back.

But what he still found her and was able to kind of let go.

That relationship and then the last ending is one we made, which is the Woody decides to be on the road with Bo.

I think once we realized that for Woody to really change in this movie, he could not go back to Bonnie's Room, and things had to be different to you.

Couldn't you couldn't go into bondage room and beat the favorite toy because we've already seen them see that for three movies, so we had to change it up and make it feel like this is a completely different chapter and what his life would He's lost toy.

He's not anymore.

What have we learned from?

I mean, I've learned that a lot of people are heavily invested in digging deeper into these stories deeper than we ever thought as we were making them, which is kind of actually cool.

Yeah, I love that.

I think that's great.

I will say that there's so many more theories that you guys haven't even come up with that are actually correct.

So keep digging, keep digging, keep looking.