Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • The following content is provided under a Creative

  • Commons license.

  • Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare

  • continue to offer high quality educational resources for free.

  • To make a donation or view additional materials

  • from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare

  • at ocw.mit.edu.

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Today we should be completing the translation

  • cycle.

  • And the next topic that will come up

  • is use of antibiotics as tools to study the ribosome

  • and translation.

  • So just a recap from last time, we went over the delivery

  • of aminoacyl--tRNAs by EF-TU and looked at this model

  • for understanding how that happens, OK?

  • So recall, we discussed the initial binding

  • of the ternary complex of EF-TU GTP and the aminoacyl-tRNA.

  • And that's codon independent.

  • When a codon/anticodon match occurs,

  • we have a push in the forward direction.

  • EF-TU's a GTPase.

  • There's activation of the GTP center.

  • So conformational changes, GTP hydrolysis.

  • So we have EF-TU and the GTP bound form.

  • There's conformational change, and ultimately

  • accommodation of this tRNA in the A site.

  • And that allows for peptide bond formation.

  • So where we left off last time was

  • discussing the conformational changes

  • that occur in the decoding center

  • and also in the GTP center of EF-TU.

  • And just to highlight, I mentioned

  • that there are conformational changes within the 16S rRNA,

  • in particular three nucleotides that

  • occur when it's a cognate codon/anticodon interaction.

  • And these are just shown here.

  • And effectively what we're looking at in these three

  • panels are the 16S rRNA in the absence of the tRNA,

  • in the presence of the tRNA, but the tRNA

  • is removed from this image for simplicity,

  • and then with the tRNA bound.

  • So some of the easiest changes to see here

  • are with A1492 and A1493.

  • So if we look in the absence of tRNA,

  • they're pointing down the bases.

  • And here as a result of tRNA binding in the A site,

  • we see that A1492 and 1493 are flipped, flipped up.

  • OK.

  • And if we look here, you can see how these are interacting

  • with the bound tRNA.

  • OK.

  • So this conformational change helps

  • to accelerate the forward steps.

  • So that's in the decoding center.

  • And then also just remember 70 angstroms away

  • in the GTP center of EF-TU, there's

  • conformational change of these hydrophobic residues that

  • are thought to be a hydrophobic gate that allows histamine

  • 84 to activate a water molecule for attack in GTP hydrolysis.

  • So at this stage we're finally ready to have a peptide bond

  • formed by the ribosome.

  • And so we need to think about that mechanism and then

  • what happens after.

  • I'll say, so effectively what we have in the P site

  • is the tRNA with some growing peptide chain.

  • [WRITING ON BOARD]

  • And then we have the aminoacyl-tRNA in the A site.

  • [WRITING ON BOARD]

  • And so what happens effectively, we have attack from here,

  • release such that we end up with a P site

  • with a deacylated tRNA.

  • And in the A site we now have the peptidyl-tRNA that

  • has grown by one amino acid monomer.

  • [WRITING ON BOARD]

  • Here, OK?

  • OK.

  • And so this is the N- terminal end

  • of the protein or the polypeptide,

  • and here's the C terminal end here.

  • So thinking about this mechanism and having nucleophilic attack

  • from this alpha amino group of the aminoacyl-tRNA in the A

  • site, what do we need to think about?

  • Is there anything surprising or unusual?

  • AUDIENCE: Think about protonation state.

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Yeah, right.

  • Exactly.

  • We need to think about the pKa.

  • So typically do we think about an alpha amino group being

  • protonated or deprotonated, that physiological pH.

  • Yeah.

  • Protonated we typically think about an H3+, not an H2 here.

  • So what does that tell us?

  • There has to be a general base somewhere

  • that deprotonates this alpha amino group,

  • such that we have this species that can attack,

  • and then can imagine just formation and collapse

  • of a tetrahedral intermediate here.

  • So what is the mechanism of catalysis?

  • OK.

  • Our room's possessed.

  • So what is the mechanism of catalysis here?

  • What do we know?

  • So we know from looking at the structure

  • that the ribosome is a ribozyme.

  • So no proteins in the catalytic center.

  • What else do we know?

  • There's no metal ions there and there's no covalent catalysis.

  • So really what is a paradigm here?

  • We have a paradigm of conformational change

  • and effectively we have substrate positioning.

  • You can imagine there's some protons shuttling

  • in an electrostatic network that allows this to happen.

  • And so as soon as this aminoacyl-tRNA

  • enters the A site, we have formulation

  • of this peptide bond.

  • So what needs to happen next-- and once the screen gets fixed,

  • we'll look at an actual depiction

  • of these players in the PTC.

  • What needs to happen after the peptide bond forms--

  • and we have now this peptidyl tRNA in the A site

  • is that before the next round of elongation effectively

  • we need to reset, and the mRNA and the tRNAs

  • need to move relative to the ribosome.

  • OK.

  • So effectively we need to get this deacylated tRNA to the E

  • site, and we need to get this peptidyl tRNA to the P site

  • such that the A site is empty.

  • Is it not going down?

  • Pardon?

  • OK, that's fine.

  • So this process is called translocation here,

  • and effectively we can just consider the three sites.

  • We have the E site, the P site, and the A site.

  • [WRITING ON BOARD]

  • OK.

  • And in this process another elongation factor,

  • this time elongation factor G is involved.

  • And the outcome is that we end up

  • with the deacylated tRNA in the E site,

  • the peptidyl tRNA in the P site.

  • OK.

  • And then the A site is empty such

  • that the next aminoacyl-tRNA can come in.

  • OK.

  • So immediately after peptide bond formation, and this

  • is the state after the process called translocation.

  • So EFG is also a GTPase here.

  • And effectively what happens is that EFG

  • bound to GTP binds near the A site and GTP hydrolysis occurs.

  • Bless you.

  • OK.

  • And as a result of GTP hydrolysis,

  • there's conformational change.

  • OK.

  • And this results in translocation and then EFG

  • is released.

  • And in thinking about translocation

  • we think about two steps.

  • OK.

  • And so the first step is something called formation

  • of hybrid states, and then the second step

  • is the actual movement, the mRNA and tRNA

  • relative to the ribosome here.

  • So we'll take a look at this.

  • So here's just an overview of peptide bond formation

  • backtracking a little bit, and then back to here.

  • Thinking about confirmations and what

  • this looks like, what we're seeing here in this depiction

  • is the P site tRNA in green, we have the A site tRNA

  • in this red color, and then we see the 23S rRNA shaded

  • in light blue in the back.

  • OK.

  • So here's A76, here is an attached amino acid,

  • and we see the nucleophile here, and attack there.

  • OK.

  • So substrate positioning within this active site.

  • Here, as I talked about this translocation process,

  • we're now at this stage as shown with a depiction

  • of the ribosome.

  • So this is where we're going using EFG in complex with GTP

  • to allow the translocation process to occur.

  • Here is another cartoon depiction.

  • And so if we begin after peptide bond formation,

  • we see the incoming EFG in complex with GTP.

  • And if we look in this cartoon, it

  • shows EFG binding near the A site.

  • So it's not binding exactly in the A site, but nearby.

  • OK.

  • There's GTP hydrolysis.

  • We now have EFG in the GTP bound form.

  • OK.

  • And now we see translocation, and that these tRNAs

  • have moved.

  • And after this step, EFG is released.

  • And at this stage the ribosome is

  • ready for its next round of the translation cycle.

  • So let's take a look at what we know

  • about the structure of EFG.

  • So this is a really beautiful example of molecular mimicry,

  • and EFG is shown here.

  • And if we compare EFG to the complex of EF-TU

  • with tRNA like the ternary complex shown here, what we see

  • is they look very similar, and this domain IV of EFG

  • resembles the tRNA quite well.

  • So just looking at that we can begin

  • to think maybe its domain IV that's

  • coming in near that A site to have some interactions

  • and cause this translocation event.

  • Here is just a comparison of the ribosomes with either EF-TU

  • and tRNA bound, which we've seen before,

  • and here we see EFG in this red color.

  • So quite similar, but are they the same?

  • And the answer is no.

  • So quite recently a crystal structure

  • was obtained with EFG bound to the ribosome,

  • and it was determined that in this structure

  • EFG is bound in the post translational state.

  • So what do we see?

  • If we take a look here, we have a tRNA

  • in the E site, a tRNA in the P site,

  • and here in red we see EFG.

  • And if you take a look, recall that ribosomal protein

  • L12 that was involved in recruiting the ternary complex,

  • we're seeing that there's some interaction here with EFG

  • in that protein as well.

  • If we look in this panel B--

  • so we look at a close up view near the A site,

  • what's happening?

  • Here's a P site tRNA, here is the mRNA,

  • and here is EFG bound, and it's domain IV

  • that's sticking its way in.

  • OK.

  • And so what are we seeing here?

  • Basically these tRNAs have moved at this stage

  • and we still have EFG bound here.

  • So is EFG interacting with the A site codon of the mRNA

  • based on this view?

  • AUDIENCE: Not really.

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Yeah.

  • No.

  • So not really.

  • So it's not interacting in the same way as the tRNA.

  • That's the take home here.

  • They look the same, but the details are different here.

  • OK.

  • So what about these hybrid states?

  • They have two different views, and the slides

  • for looking at this--

  • effectively what the hybrid states are--

  • OK.

  • These describe basically the orientation of the tRNAs.

  • So effectively they can be P/E or A/P here.

  • And the P/E state talks about having the anticodon end in P

  • and the deacylated three prime end in E. OK.

  • So here we're referring to this tRNA

  • that ultimately needs to get ejected from the ribosome.

  • And A/P we have the anticodon end in A

  • and the peptidyl three prime end in P

  • for the tRNA with the growing peptide chain.

  • So effectively these hybrid states

  • are describing the movement of the three

  • prime ends of the tRNAs with respect to the 50S subunit.

  • And that's shown in cartoon form on the slide here.

  • OK.

  • So effectively if we take a look, we have accommodation,

  • so the aminoacyl-tRNA we see there's

  • formation of a peptide bond.

  • So there's some color coding here, and then look,

  • rather than having these tRNAs straight up and down,

  • we see that the three prime ends have shifted.

  • So here we have the P anticodon end in P, three prime end in E,

  • here AP with anticodon end in A, and peptidyl three prime end

  • in P.

  • OK.

  • So first the three prime ends move, and then

  • what do we see after the help of EFG?

  • The five prime ends move and the A site

  • is empty and able to take the next aminoacyl-tRNA.

  • Here's just another view of the process

  • for you to look at here.

  • Yes?

  • AUDIENCE: It's kind of from a few slides back, if that's OK.

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: That's OK.

  • AUDIENCE: So on EFG where you have that anti-codon looking

  • blue, there's no hydrogen bond interacting

  • with the transcript.

  • Is that the take away?

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Can we say that based on what

  • I'm showing you on this slide?

  • AUDIENCE: I don't know.

  • It just looks like it's around there,

  • but I can't tell what the actual hydrogen bond interaction part.

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: So those details

  • are outside of the scope.

  • EFG will interact with that mRNA, the peptidyl tRNA,

  • but it's interacting differently than a standard aminoacyl-tRNA.

  • So it's not really interacting with the codon

  • at this level of depiction.

  • We're not seeing individual bonds or hydrogen bonds.

  • So we can't make a conclusion about that

  • based on this depiction here.

  • AUDIENCE: What's the resolution of this structure?

  • Is it high resolution or is it--

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Yeah.

  • That's another issue here.

  • I don't recall the resolution, but they're not great.

  • So if you have a four angstrom resolution structure,

  • for instance, is that type of information even available

  • versus the resolution of maybe 1.5 or 1?

  • Yeah.

  • This resolution I don't recall, but that's a very good point

  • to bring up.

  • I don't think it's high enough to know

  • that would be my guess here.

  • Pardon?

  • Oh, the resolution?

  • So rewinding back to recitation last week.

  • So crystal structures have a resolution.

  • And so what does one angstrom resolution versus two

  • versus four allow us to see?

  • Oh.

  • Oh.

  • The question is, are there hydrogen bonding interactions

  • between EFG, and say, the mRNA?

  • Well, there's definitely going to be hydrogens

  • because you're going to have C-H bonds or C-N bonds.

  • But--

  • AUDIENCE: I can't see any of them, at least

  • from this picture.

  • And also, is this picture actually a picture or is it

  • just like a [INAUDIBLE]?

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: This is from the crystal structure.

  • AUDIENCE: But it's not itself a crystal structure.

  • They take out all the hydrogens, wouldn't you,

  • and you wouldn't see anything, right?

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: OK.

  • So this is from the crystal structure

  • and you can make choices as to what information you

  • put in your depiction, whether or not

  • you're going to show certain residues say,

  • or just the backbone there.

  • AUDIENCE: I'm not sure what we are expecting to see,

  • but don't see.

  • We will get the heteroatom distances.

  • Yeah.

  • And so the question is, how much error is there,

  • and if there's one error, you can't tell

  • where the analide regions are.

  • AUDIENCE: So we're looking at distances

  • like between potential hydrogen bonding sites as our measure--

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Or heteroatoms because you may not

  • be able to see that hydrogen. But you can know something

  • like, oh, if this heteroatom and that heteroatom

  • are so many angstroms apart, is it likely that there's

  • a hydrogen bonding interaction or not based on knowledge

  • of bond distances here?

  • So one thing I'll note and will come up

  • as we're discussing antibiotics, I

  • said nothing about how they've obtained the structure.

  • And that's just something to keep in mind.

  • And this also gets to the question of resolution,

  • and what can you see?

  • But they had tremendous difficulties

  • getting this structure, and they had to use a mutant ribosome,

  • and they strategically used an antibiotic

  • to stall the ribosome here.

  • So many, many attempts to get crystals

  • that are even good enough to get some information here.

  • OK.

  • So back to these hybrid states and the formation

  • of the hybrid states.

  • Something important to know about--

  • and this is something I have a lot of time seeing

  • in any cartoon that's presented is

  • that the 30S subunit undergoes some conformational change

  • called ratcheting.

  • And effectively the ribosome can exist

  • at this stage in either an unratcheted or ratcheted state

  • and EFG selects from one over the other.

  • So EFG will bind this ratcheted ribosome.

  • And effectively what that terminology

  • is describing is a small rotation

  • of about 6 degrees of the 30S relative to the 50S

  • in one direction.

  • So the ribosome will be going between

  • unratcheted and ratcheted.

  • EFG can bind the ratcheted form.

  • OK.

  • And after that occurs, they'll be

  • GTP hydrolysis on these translocation events here.

  • So an awful lot is going on to get

  • that one peptide bond formed and the ribosome

  • ready to do it again.

  • Where we're going to go at this stage

  • is a brief discussion of the termination

  • process in translation and the players that come up there.

  • So effectively the elongation cycle

  • is going to continue until a stop codon enters the A site.

  • That's making the assumption some unforeseen circumstance

  • hasn't happened to this ribosome.

  • It hasn't stalled or prematurely stopped translation.

  • So what happens when a stop codon enters the A site?

  • OK.

  • Again, we have translation factors.

  • These translation factors are release factors

  • that recognize the stop codon, and they

  • have the responsibility of cleaving the polypeptide chain

  • from the P site tRNA.

  • And so there are two different classes of release factors.

  • We have class 1, which are release factors 1 and 2.

  • Release factor 1 and release factor 2

  • each recognize they're in stop codons.

  • So, for instance, RF1 recognizes UAA and UAG.

  • Whereas RF2 recognizes UAA and UGA here.

  • There's a class 3 release factor RF3.

  • This one is a GTPase and it has the job

  • of accelerating dissociation of RF1 or RF2

  • after peptide release.

  • So we'll look a little bit at structure and then one

  • schematic for how this may all happen.

  • So similar to EFG and the ternary complex

  • of EF-TU GTP and the tRNA, we have another example

  • of molecular mimicry with these release factors.

  • And so initially when release factor 1 was crystallized,

  • the structure shown here was obtained.

  • So this was the protein crystallized

  • in the absence of the ribosome, and it was a little difficult

  • to reconcile this structure with function immediately.

  • And then in later work RF1 was crystallized

  • bound to the ribosome.

  • And that structure is shown here.

  • And so if we compare the left to the right

  • or what's described as the closed to the open version

  • of RF1, what we see is that there's

  • a pretty substantial change in conformation

  • when we're looking at RF1 on the ribosome.

  • And if we use a little imagination

  • we can think about RF1 resembling a tRNA.

  • OK.

  • We have this region here that's sticking out.

  • And if we look at an overlay of RF1,

  • so this structure of the ribosome

  • bound structure in a tRNA, what do we see?

  • So we have the tRNA, we have the anticodon end down here,

  • we have the CCA end of the tRNA up here.

  • And so what do we see?

  • In terms of RF1, we have this PVT motif down here

  • and we have this GGQ motif up here for that.

  • And so this motif is important for hydrolysis

  • of the peptidyl tRNA.

  • And that's where it is.

  • In terms of a schematic for termination

  • as a way to thinking about this--

  • so here we have our ribosome that's then translating

  • and now there's a stop codon in the A site.

  • So here comes a release factor, either 1 or 2.

  • It recognizes this stop and binds.

  • So there's hydrolysis of this linkage--

  • and should think about that chemistry to what's happening.

  • --peptide release.

  • So what's shown in this depiction is that RF3 comes in

  • and it was in GTP bound form.

  • It binds in the region of the A site.

  • There's some exchange.

  • We have GTP coming in here and then some additional steps

  • that involve GTP hydrolysis by RF3 involvement of the ribosome

  • recycling factor.

  • And we see that our friend EFG comes into play again here

  • along with initiation factor 3.

  • So some of these other translation factors

  • seem to play a role in this termination cycle.

  • And really, again, it's a question

  • of looking at the data that's presented to you

  • and interpreting that data and drawing some conclusions.

  • So there's still a number of questions

  • about this process and the ribosome recycling that remain.

  • So if we look about this slide and where

  • we've come in this discussion of translation effectively,

  • all of the pieces are shown here for prokaryotes.

  • So this is just a map to work your way through when

  • studying the system.

  • But we have initiation, we have elongation,

  • and then this process of peptide release and ribosome recycling.

  • OK.

  • And so throughout this we're seeing the action of GTPases.

  • So the power of GTP hydrolysis is needed.

  • Conversion of chemical to mechanical energy.

  • There's a lot of conformational change that's happening.

  • The slides I've shown you don't do that justice but it's

  • something to think about and keep in mind,

  • and that this ribosome is amazingly dynamic.

  • And so that is what's going to lead us

  • into the next subtopic related to the ribosome, which

  • is thinking about how have some of these observations been

  • made?

  • So how is it that we've obtained structural insights

  • into the ribosome at different steps along this translation

  • cycle?

  • And just as for consideration, there's

  • a little excerpt from a paper I like.

  • So this was in 2010.

  • So shortly after the Nobel Prize was awarded.

  • And so there's a number of perspectives,

  • retrospectives in the literature.

  • And in this one called the Ribosome Comes Alive,

  • Joachim Frank is talking about these pioneering work

  • of the X-ray structure.

  • And just in yellow here, he's stating,

  • those who might have expected that the atomic resolution

  • structure of this massive RNA protein complex

  • would itself offer immediate insight

  • into the mechanism of translation

  • were thoroughly disappointed.

  • And in fact the mechanism proposed

  • from some of this early study ended up not being

  • the correct mechanism here.

  • There's a note about that on an earlier

  • slide where the peptide bond formation step is shown.

  • So what does he say?

  • "I'd like to compare this situation to a visit to Earth

  • by a martian who wants to understand

  • how an automobile works."

  • OK.

  • So we can all think about flipping up the hood of our car

  • and what do we see?

  • "She looks under the hood of a parked car,

  • perhaps even takes the engine apart, but still has no clue.

  • It's clear she'll have much better luck

  • if she's able to see that engine in motion."

  • And so that's been a major goal in terms

  • of thinking about the ribosome as well as

  • other micro-molecular machines.

  • How can you actually see these in motion

  • and see the dynamics and conformational changes here?

  • Really critical.

  • So the question I pose is, is it possible to see

  • the ribosome stopped at various points in translation cycle?

  • And if so, how?

  • So maybe we can't see the dynamics continually,

  • but can we sort of park it at different steps?

  • And the answer to that is yes.

  • And basically a huge part of our understanding of this 70S

  • ribosome does come from crystal structures,

  • and researchers have been able to trap

  • the ribosome at various points in the translation cycle using

  • small molecules.

  • And these small molecules are antibiotics.

  • So where we're going to focus on for the rest of today

  • and probably the beginning of Monday

  • is thinking about the use as antibiotics.

  • So small molecules that inhibit bacterial growth as tools

  • for studying ribosome function.

  • So a few questions related to that.

  • First of all, what types of antibiotics

  • target the ribosome?

  • Where do they bind to the ribosome,

  • and how can we use them experimentally?

  • And also something just to think about,

  • we have a crisis in the clinic in terms

  • of a lack of new antibiotics and emerging antibiotic resistance.

  • So how can fundamental understanding of the ribosome

  • help in terms of therapeutic development?

  • And this came up in a bit of a different context in seminar

  • on Monday for anyone that was at Biological Chemistry Seminar.

  • So we had Professor Matt Disney with us who was looking

  • at small molecules to target RNA's.

  • And one question that can come from that is, are there

  • unknown molecules out there that might target

  • the ribosome in different ways from the examples

  • we currently have?

  • I was super excited this morning to learn about a new book.

  • So if any of you are interested in antibiotics,

  • Professor Chris Walsh and Professor Tim Wencewicz

  • at St. Louis have written a new book looking at antibiotics

  • from a very chemocentric perspective here,

  • and our friends on the cover.

  • So I suspect be a wonderful read if you're curious.

  • So let's take a look as a segue into thinking about these

  • at the structure I just showed you

  • a VFG bound to the ribosome.

  • So we talked about how EFG is helping in the translocation

  • process, and we saw the structure,

  • and I told you in passing that this structure was

  • very difficult for the researchers to obtain.

  • And at the end of the day, they needed to use a mutant ribosome

  • for reasons I won't go into.

  • It's not relevant for this discussion.

  • And also, a natural product that has antibacterial activity

  • shown here.

  • And so this small molecule binds EFG

  • and it binds to EFG when EFG is bound to the ribosome.

  • And moreover, it binds to EFG after GTP hydrolysis occurs.

  • OK.

  • So the result is that this natural product

  • can be used to trap the ribosome in this post translocational

  • state where EFG is still bound.

  • So it's hydrolyzed GTP.

  • There's been movement of the mRNA and tRNAs,

  • but EFG cannot dissociate as a result of use of this small

  • molecule.

  • So you can begin to imagine how including

  • this molecule or maybe other antibiotics

  • that stop the ribosome at different steps

  • can be used to obtain crystals and crystal structures here.

  • And furthermore, they can also be

  • used in a number of biochemical studies--

  • and we'll look at an example of that

  • in the context of this lecture.

  • --and also in recitations and problem sets.

  • So where do antibiotics bind to the ribosome,

  • and how many of them are out there that

  • can bind the ribosome here?

  • There's many options.

  • So many antibiotics target the ribosome.

  • And if we just look at a 30S subunit and a 50S subunit

  • and take a handful of antibiotics

  • that target the ribosome and see what

  • we know about where they bind, we

  • can make maps like these ones here

  • and we can consider larger lists.

  • You're not responsible for these details at all.

  • Just the take home message is that there's

  • many options and an extensive toolkit.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: Are the eukaryotic and prokaryotic ribosomes

  • similar enough that most of these antibiotics

  • also affect the eukaryotic ribosomes?

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Yeah.

  • So that's a great question and something to think about.

  • So that will depend on the molecule.

  • There are many differences between the prokaryotic and

  • eukaryotic ribosomes.

  • Some will bind both.

  • There is an example thiostrepton I

  • believe that's quite specific, not for eukaryotic ribosomes.

  • I mean, that's something also to think about.

  • If they interact, are they interacting in the same way?

  • And if they do inhibit the ribosome,

  • is it by the same mechanism?

  • And you can imagine implications related

  • to therapeutic development in terms of that exact issue.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: Do we have like a lot more ribosomes

  • than prokaryotes?

  • Is that also [INAUDIBLE] to have a lot more [INAUDIBLE]

  • a lot more antibiotic [INAUDIBLE] that for us too?

  • Do you know what I mean?

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Yeah.

  • I mean I think that's a little outside

  • of the scope of our discussion because how do you

  • get to counting ribosomes?

  • Is that per cell or organism by organism and microbiome

  • versus person?

  • Is there another question?

  • AUDIENCE: The ratio of the number of ribosomes

  • we have to the number of proteins

  • that we need to be producing, eukaryotic cells

  • are more complex--

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: Eukaryotic cells are definitely

  • more complex right there.

  • So what I say is overall case by case basis.

  • So what about structures?

  • Here are just some examples.

  • Structures are highly variable and the ways

  • in which these molecules can inhibit translation

  • are highly variable.

  • These are some examples that you may

  • have come up with some of these in terms of laboratory work

  • or maybe even been prescribed.

  • So, for instance, chloroamphenicol This molecule

  • here binds the 30S, prevents peptidyl transfer.

  • Tetracycline binds the 50s and blocks accommodation.

  • Gentamicin binds the 30S, causes premature termination.

  • Erythromycin is a macrolide that for a long time

  • has been thought to block exit of the polypeptide

  • because it binds in the exit tunnel.

  • But there's some new recent work suggesting a revision

  • to that mechanism here.

  • What are some general observations we can make?

  • And keep in mind, there's always exceptions to the rule.

  • So most of the antibiotics targeting the ribosome

  • that we know about interact with the RNA,

  • but, of course, some can interact with proteins.

  • And we just saw an example of that with EFG.

  • These antibiotics primarily target the decoding center

  • and peptidyl transfer A center.

  • Which makes sense if you're thinking

  • about inhibiting translation.

  • But, again, there's some exceptions.

  • So thiostrepton interacts with the ribosomal protein

  • that's not in that region.

  • Magnesium might be necessary for antibiotic binding.

  • So this is something to think about if using antibiotics

  • in experiments.

  • And just related to the earlier question,

  • a given antibiotic may bind ribosomes of different species

  • differently there.

  • And so what are the consequences of that

  • is something to think about.

  • So here we're just looking at an overview of various antibiotics

  • bound to the 50S.

  • So this is taken from multiple different structures

  • and the ribosome itself has been removed.

  • But imagine that the A site tRNA is around here,

  • here P site tRNA.

  • What do we see?

  • We have antibiotics called puromycins

  • that are down by the A site.

  • Here we have chloroamphenicol bound.

  • Here we have the macrolides here.

  • And just as an example of an antibiotic binding to the exit

  • tunnel-- bless you.

  • --here we're looking at the 50S.

  • We have a P site tRNA, and here we

  • have a nascent polypeptide coming through the exit tunnel,

  • and here we have some examples from structural information

  • about erythromycin, chloroamphenicol

  • bound in this region here.

  • So we're going to look at a puromycin as a case study

  • for using antibiotics as a tool in a biochemical experiment.

  • So the first thing that we need to think about

  • is the chemical structure of puromycin

  • and how that structure relates to its ability

  • to inhibit translation.

  • So these puromycins are molecules

  • that cause chain termination.

  • And we'll look at an example of a structure.

  • [WRITING ON BOARD]

  • So basically just want to use a little imagination

  • when looking at this structure.

  • What do we see?

  • So what is this small molecule mimicking?

  • Yeah.

  • So what do we have up here?

  • We have something that's adenosine like.

  • Not exactly the same structure.

  • But this may be similar to A76 of the three prime end

  • of the tRNA.

  • We have these methyl groups rather than an H2, but similar.

  • What's going on down here?

  • Pardon?

  • Yes.

  • It's similar to one amino acid or a peptide.

  • So we have something here that's amino acid like.

  • So if we're thinking about this as a mimic of the three

  • prime end of the tRNA with the amino acid bound,

  • what's fundamentally different here that's

  • going to result in different chemistry happening?

  • So how are the amino acids attached to the three prime end

  • of the tRNA?

  • What kind of linkage?

  • Yeah.

  • We have an ester in the normal circumstance.

  • And what do we have here?

  • Here we have an amide.

  • So this is non-hydrolyzable.

  • And what else do we have?

  • Right here we have a nucleophile for the P site ester.

  • So what can happen?

  • Imagine that puromycin somehow can enter the A site.

  • There's a nucleophile that will allow for chain transfer, such

  • that the peptide that's on the P site tRNA gets transferred.

  • But then what?

  • OK.

  • We're stuck because of this MI bond here.

  • So effectively chain termination.

  • OK.

  • And so what's known is this molecule

  • and its analogs can bind to the 50s A site.

  • And that's something kind of incredible to think about.

  • We talked about this machinery EF-TU

  • that's needed to deliver the aminoacyl-tRNA.

  • Puromycin can get there on its own.

  • Which means maybe for an experiment,

  • that is easier to do if you're going

  • to use this in your experiment.

  • Moreover, people have synthesized

  • more complex versions.

  • Just an example is shown here.

  • C-pmn where we also have C75 of the tRNA mimicked here.

  • And so this is just an overview of elongation,

  • and then effectively chain termination happening

  • after thinking about having a puromycin in the A site,

  • a peptidyl tRNA, or some other molecule in the P site

  • and the chemistry that occurs here.

  • So we'll think about and close with one experiment that's

  • been done using puromycin.

  • And we won't have time to go through all of it

  • in the last few minutes of today,

  • but I'll just introduce the problem

  • and we'll continue with the experiment next time.

  • OK.

  • And so what we're going to think about

  • is a translation factor that hasn't come up yet in class.

  • And this is elongation factor P. OK.

  • And for a long time its function was unclear.

  • [WRITING ON BOARD]

  • OK.

  • And so over the years this translation factor

  • was implicated in a variety of cellular processes,

  • but there wasn't any clear answer in terms of really

  • what is its role?

  • And so about two years ago there were two back to back papers--

  • one of these papers by Rodina and co-workers.

  • So they're the authors of the paper being studied

  • in recitation this week.

  • --published work reporting on why EFP

  • is important for translation.

  • So prior to their work there were some preliminary studies

  • indicating that somehow this elongation

  • factor helps to modulate and accelerate

  • peptide bond formation.

  • But the questions are, when?

  • So under what circumstances does EFP accelerate peptide bond

  • formation?

  • And then you can think kind of a follow up of that, how?

  • And so we'll look at some experiments that

  • were designed and performed using puromycin as a tool

  • to address this question.

  • And that's where we'll start on Monday.

The following content is provided under a Creative

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it