In order to make use of quantum phenomena and avoid calculation errors, the most advanced

versions need to be kept as near as possible to absolute zero, aka zero kelvin, aka -273.15

degrees celcius, aka the coldest temperature there is.

Now though, researchers claim they've demonstrated “hot qubits,” which could be key to overcoming

a major obstacle to scaling this technology up.

The quantum computer is built around the quantum bit, or qubit.

Like a classical bit in the computers you're used to seeing every day, a quantum bit can

be used to represent a one or a zero in logical operations.

But unlike a classical bit, a single qubit can also be any combination of one and zero

simultaneously thanks to the quantum phenomenon of superposition.

Qubits can also take advantage of quantum entanglement.

This allows a quantum computer composed of dozens of qubits to tackle certain problems

in minutes, while ordinary supercomputers would take millenia.

For quantum computers the enemy is decoherence, when qubits interact with the environment

and lose information.

The colder and more isolated the qubit is, the less likely it is to flip to another quantum

state when it's not supposed to.

But well-isolated qubits are also difficult to keep cold, and the more qubits a computer

has, the more heat the system generates.

When you consider the fact that quantum computers that will tackle our biggest challenges like

precision drug making will require millions of qubits, the problem becomes clear: we have

to figure out how to keep these large quantum computers operating at an optimal temperature.

There are two ways of approaching the problem.

One is to improve cooling systems.

The most sophisticated quantum computers we have now are based on superconductors and

are kept cool with dilution refrigerators.

Imagine basically a hideous steampunk chandelier and you're halfway there.

Most that exist right now can keep fewer than 100 qubits cold enough to operate.

So scaling up a dilution refrigerator to keep millions of qubits cold would be incredibly

expensive, and still may not be capable of maintaining sufficient temperatures.

The other approach is to make qubits that can operate at warmer temperatures, and this

is where two separate groups of researchers believe they've made a breakthrough.

Rather than basing their qubits off superconductors, the scientists used nanoscale metal electrodes

to confine electrons in silicon, in devices known as quantum dots.

This allowed them to operate at significantly hotter temperatures.

How hot, you ask?

A scorching 1.5 kelvin.

So… not exactly flip-flops weather, but at the atomic level it's a huge difference.

That's 15 times warmer than superconductor-based qubits can operate.

A silicon basis has a few other advantages.

We are already very experienced at making things out of silicon; it's the basis for

all conventional computer chips, after all.

So the researchers claim silicon based qubits can be manufactured with foundries we have

today.

And get this: hot silicon qubits allow for the integration of conventional chips that

can control the operations of the qubit.

Normally these conventional chips would get too hot to have them next to superconducting

qubits, meaning they would have to be kept separate with long wires connecting them.

But if the qubits can operate at higher temperatures, a silicon chip can be placed right next to

them and the overall size of the computer can be greatly reduced.

Is this the breakthrough quantum computers need to push them from curious doohickies

to world-changing number crunchers?

We'll only know when this two-qubit proof-of-concept is scaled up.

Until then, we'll keep tabs on all the other quantum computing breakthroughs until one

of them finally establishes the quantum age.

Another group of researchers recently discovered a more precise way of controlling qubits in

silicon, all it took was a series of fortunate accidents.

Check out my other video on that story here.

If you had a quantum computer, what would you use it for?

Let us know in the comments, be sure to subscribe, and I'll see you next time on Seeker!