There could have been more global perspective towards many aspects of how the world has responded to this pandemic, and we just I think that's partly down to individual countries to decide.

Do they want to commit to such multilateralism?

Partly it is.

We do need to rethink a little bit.

The governance of organizations such as W H O.

One of the challenges it faces is being truly independent.

Typically, it is influenced by big states.

Historically, that's bean Western countries, the United States, now very much China as well.

Andi.

That can sometimes prove challenging in situations like the last year.

This crisis compared to many of the crisis and at least the last decades have become a lot more politicized than before.

And I think that has made W show role a lot more difficult than it than it has been, and they have Bean forced to sort of handle this political spectrum at the same time as having the technical one, and I think that really put put challenges on on them that's not being completely thio handle on the other hand, I and Sweden?

Definitely very.

We really believe that w is usually important.

But I think that there can be improvement.

Uh, after this and I think we're gonna have those discussions again.

What exactly will be will be the W show role in this.

I just looked at the last buck off countries where vaccines have been given already looking at it from a global perspective, it's heartbreaking.

Um, so but it's early days is January will have to see how the year pans out and whether we will be.

We will look back to this year as a year in which we take pride in as global citizens in terms of access to vaccines or year where we will look back and wonder.