♪♪♪ >> Stephen: HEY, EVERYBODY,

>> 斯蒂芬:嘿，大家好。

WE'RE BACK WITH SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS.

我們回來了，與參議員BERNIE SANDERS。

ER YOU SAID IN SEPTEMBER, YOU WARNED AS WE COUNT EVERY VOTE,

你在9月說過，你警告過我們，因為我們在計算每張選票。

I'VE THING POSSIBLE MUST BE DONE TO PREVENT CHAOS, DISINFORMATION

我必須做一些可能的事情，以防止混亂，資訊不暢。

AND, YES, EVEN VIOLENCE.

還有，是的，甚至是暴力。

DO YOU HAVE ANY SENSE AT THIS POINT WHY, AS YOU SAY, THIS

你有什麼感覺嗎？

TREMENDOUS FAILURE HAPPENED?

巨大的失敗發生了？

BECAUSE -- AND CHRISTOPHER WRAY SAID THE MOST DANGEROUS DOMESTIC

因為... ... 克里斯托弗-韋伊說，最危險的國內。

TERRORIST THREAT RIGHT NOW IS FROM WHITE SUPREMACIST GROUPS IN

現在的恐怖主義威脅來自於白人至上主義團體在

THIS COUNTRY.

這個國家。

SO IT'S NOT LIKE PEOPLE WEREN'T WARNED.

所以它不像人們沒有警告。

>> NO, THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT.

>> 不，這是完全正確的。

ALL I CAN TELL YOU -- YOU KNOW, WE'RE HEARING DIFFERENT STORIES

我只能告訴你 -- 你知道，我們聽到的是不同的故事。

FROM DIFFERENT PEOPLE -- EITHER IT WAS A GO DESK AND HORRIFIC

從不同的人 - 無論是一個去辦公桌和可怕的。

FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND AND TO ANTICIPATE WHAT WAS HAPPENING --

未能理解和預測正在發生的事情----

I SPOKE TO A VERY HIGHER-UP GUY WHILE I WAS IN LOCKDOWN, AND HIS

我跟一個很高大上的傢伙，當我在鎖定，和他的。

RESPONSE WAS, WELL, WE JUST DIDN'T ANTICIPATE THIS.

迴應是，嗯，我們只是沒有預料到這一點。

REALLY?

真的嗎？

REALLY?

真的嗎？

WITH ALL OF YOUR INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS, YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHAT

在你所有的智能操作中，你不知道什麼是 "我"。

WAS GOING ONLINE, YOU DIDN'T KNOW THE THREAT TO THE CAPITOL,

我在上網，你不知道對首都的威脅。

YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS EGGING THESE

你不知道總統在給這些人下蛋嗎？

PEOPLE ON?

人上？

YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT, REALLY?

你真的不知道嗎？

SO A TREMENDOUS FAILURE OF LEADERSHIP, WHICH WILL BE

是以，領導力的嚴重失誤，將是一個巨大的失敗。

INVESTIGATED, AND WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN.

經調查，我們會確保這種情況不會再發生。

>> Stephen: ALEXANDER HAMILTON WROTE IN FEDERALIST 27, THE HOPE

>> Stephen: ALEXANDER HAMILTON在《聯邦公報》第27期上寫道：希望。

OF IMPUNITY IS A STRONG INCITEMENT TO SEDITION.

懲罰是一種強烈的誘惑。

THE DREAD OF PUNISHMENT A PROPORTIONATELY STRONG

懲罰的恐懼是相當強烈的。

DISCOURAGEMENT TO IT.

我不會去做任何事情。

ISN'T IT IMPORTANT THAT JUSTICE BE SWIFT AND THE HAMMER BE HARD?

公道要公正，錘子要堅硬，這不是很重要嗎？

>> WELL, THAT'S AMONG OTHER REASONS WHY THE HOUSE, IN RATHER

>> 好吧，這也是其他原因，為什麼房子，而不是。

QUICK TIME, IMPEACHED TRUMP AND WHY HE MUST BE CONVICTED.

迅速的時間，被指責的特朗普和為什麼他必須被定罪。

YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ASK ME, THEY SAY, WHAT IS THE SENSE OF

你知道嗎，人們問我，他們說，什麼是意義上的？

IMPEACHING A GUY WHO HAS A WEEK LEFT IN HIS TERM, AND THERE'S A

暗示一個傢伙誰在他的任期內還剩一週，並有一個。

LOT OF SENSE TO IT, AND THE SENSE IS THAT THIS PRESIDENT AND

我覺得很有道理，而我的感覺是，這位主席和他的同事們都很喜歡他。

ANYBODY ELSE WHO ENTERS THE OVAL OFFICE MUST UNDERSTAND THAT IF

進入VAL辦公室的任何人都必須明白，如果：

YOU INCITE INSURRECTION AGAINST YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT FOR YOUR OWN

你為了自己的利益而對自己的政府進行煽動性的報復。

CHIEF POLITICAL PURPOSES, THAT WILL BE SEVERELY PUNISHED.

首席政治目的，將受到嚴厲的懲罰。

>> Stephen: I TRUST THAT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND THE

>> 史蒂芬: 我相信司法部和... ...

F.B.I. IS TAKING THIS SERIOUSLY AND WILL USE ALL OF THE POWER AT

F.B.I.正在認真對待這件事，並將動用所有的權力，在

THEIR COMMAND TO BRING THE PEOPLE WHO DID THIS TO JUSTICE,

他們的命令是將做這件事的人繩之以法。

AND CERTAINLY NOTHING THEY DID WAS DEFENSIBLE, BUT WHAT ABOUT

他們所做的一切都無可辯解，但是... ...

PEOPLE LIKE JOSH HAWLEY AND TED CRUZ?

人們喜歡喬什-霍利和泰德-克魯茲？

WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE MOE BROOKS, ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO

像MOE BROOKS這樣的人怎麼辦？

INCITED THIS CROWD, AS I SAID AND YOU AGREED, WITH THE BIG

煽動這群人，正如我說的，你也同意，與大。

LIE?

撒謊？

I DON'T THINK THAT'S A CONTROVERSIAL THING THAT THEY

我不認為這是一個有爭議的事情，他們。

INSPIRED THESE PEOPLE.

鼓舞了這些人。

WHAT CAN BE DONE SO THAT NO GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EVER DOES

怎樣做才能讓政府官員不再做任何事情？

THIS AGAIN AND, CERTAINLY, NO CROWD EVER DOES THIS AGAIN?

這又來了，而且，肯定的是，沒有任何人群再這樣做？

DOESN'T THERE HAVE -- SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE TO THEM, WHAT CAN

難道就沒有 - 必須對他們做些什麼，什麼可以

THE SENATE DO?

參議院怎麼辦？

>> I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING WE'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW.

>> 我想這就是我們現在要研究的問題。

WHAT HAS CONCERNED ME THE MOST, AND, AGAIN, I'M HEARING

我最擔心的是什麼，而且，我又一次聽到了。

ALLEGATIONS ON THESE HAVE TO BE INVESTIGATED, IS THAT THERE WERE

這些指控必須進行調查，是否存在著

SOME MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE WHO ACTUALLY ESCORTED PEOPLE WHO

實際評價過的一些眾議院議員的人

TURNED OUT TO BE RIOTERS THE DAY BEFORE THROUGH THE CAPITOL

原來是暴徒的前一天通過首都

PREMISES.

房產：

NOW, WHAT THE HELL THAT'S ABOUT, WE HAVE TO FIND OUT.

現在，這到底是怎麼回事，我們必須找出答案。

>> Stephen: EVEN THOUGH THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO VISITORS, NO

>> Stephen:即使沒有來訪者，也沒有。

TOURS OF THE CAPITOL SINCE MARCH.

自3月以來的首都之旅。

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

>> 沒錯。

>> Stephen: NOT EVEN MEMBERS ARE REALLY ALLOWED TO BRING ANY

>> Stephen:即使是會員也不允許帶任何。

PEOPLE IN FOR A TOUR.

PEOPLE IN FOR A TOUR.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

>> 沒錯。

IF THAT ALLEGATION IS TRUE, STEPHEN, IF IT'S TRUE, THAT TELL

如果這個說法是真的，Stephen，如果是真的，那就告訴你...

US SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE DEALT WITH.

我們必須處理的事情。

>> Stephen: WHAT ABOUT THE SENATORS?

>> 史蒂芬: 參議員們呢?

I KNOW YOU'RE THE WORLD'S MOST DELIBERATIVE BODY BUT THERE HAS

我知道你是世界上最美味的身體，但也有。

TO BE A LIMIT WHERE YOU HAVE TO ASK SHOULD THIS PERSON BE IN

是一個限制，在那裡你必須問，這個人是否應該在

HERE WITH US IF THEY AREN'T WILLING TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF

如果他們不願意接受結果，就和我們一起在這裡。

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHEN THEY VOTE?

美國人民在投票的時候？

>> ON THE ONE HAND YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT EXPELLING

>> 一方面，你要注意排放的問題。

PEOPLE, THEY WERE ELECTED BY CONSTITUENTS.

人民，他們是由憲法選出來的。

TRUST ME, THIS WILL BE AN ISSUE.

相信我，這將是一個問題。

HOW WE DEAL WITH THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WILL BE LOOKED AT

我們如何處理這個問題，是我們要研究的問題。

VERY, VERY HARD.

非常，非常難。

>> Stephen: CAN YOU AT LEAST MAKE TED CRUZ OR JOSH HAWLEY

>> Stephen:你能不能至少讓TED CRUZ或者JOSH HAWLEY也加入？

WEAR A STUPID HAT THAT SAYS SEDITIONIST ON TOP?

戴著一頂上面寫著保守派的愚蠢帽子？

THEY HAVE TO FACE THE CORNER.

他們必須面對角落。

THERE HAS TO BE A STAIN THAT DOESN'T LEAVE THEM AS A JUDGMENT

必須有一個汙點，不離開他們作為一個判斷。

OF HISTORY.

的歷史。

>> AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE CRISIS IS YOU HAVE A PRESIDENT

>> 到了一天結束的時候，危機是你有一個總統。

WHO GAVE US A BIG, BIG LIE THAT HE WON THE ELECTION BY A LAND

誰給我們撒了一個彌天大謊，說他以一分之差贏得了選舉？

SLIDE WHEN, IN FACT, HE LOST, AND THEN YOU HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF

幻燈片，當，事實上，他輸了，然後你有很多的。

PEOPLE, NOT JUST CRUZ AND HAWLEY, WHO TID NOT SAY WHAT IS

人們，而不僅僅是克魯茲和霍利，誰不說什麼是。

SIMPLY THE TRUTH, HEY, PEOPLE RUN IN ELECTIONS AND LOSE.

簡單的真相，嘿，人們在選舉中競選和失敗。

I'VE WON, SOMETIMES YOU WIN.

我贏了，有時你也會贏。

H LOST THE ELECTION, PERIOD, END OF DISCUSSION, AND WE HAD

H失去了選舉，期間，討論結束，我們有：

VERY VERY VERY FEW SENATORS WHO MADE THAT STATEMENT.

很少有參議員發表這樣的言論。

>> Stephen: ONCE THE NEWEST SNRRTS ARE SWORN?

>> 史蒂芬：一旦最新的SNRRTS被宣誓？

-- SENATORS ARE SWORN IN, THE DEMOCRATS, YOU CONFERENCING WITH

-- 參議員宣誓就職了，民主黨人，你在和他們開會嗎？

THEM, WILL HAVE CONTROL OF THE SENATE, AND YOU WILL BE THE NEW

他們將控制參議院，而你將成為新的。

CHAIR OF THE BUDGET COMMITTEE.

預算委員會主席。

THAT'S YOUR FIRST PRIORITY?

這是你的第一優先級？

>> MY FIRST PRIORITY IS TO WORK ON A COMPREHENSIVE

>> 我的首要任務是進行全面的工作。

RECONCILIATION BILL, WITHOUT GETTING INTO ALL THE RULES OF

《重新審議法案》，但不涉及《公約》的所有規則。

THE SENATE.

參議院：

THIS IS A MEANS BY WHICH WE CAN PASS VERY SIGNIFICANT

這是一個手段，我們可以通過非常重要的。

LEGISLATION WITH A MAJORITY, WITH 51 VOTES AND NOT WITH 60.

以51票而非60票的多數票進行立法。

AND I'M GOING TO MAKE THAT RECONCILIATION BILL AS BOLD AND

而我要把那份重新編纂的法案寫得更大、更醒目。

AGGRESSIVE AS I POSSIBLY CAN.

儘可能的攻擊性，我可以。

WE FACE MORE CRISES TODAY THAN ANYTIME IN THE MODERN HISTORY OF

我們今天面臨的危機比當代歷史上任何時候都多。

THIS COUNTRY.

這個國家。

IT'S NOT JUST THE TERRIBLE PANDEMIC WHICH HAS CLAIMED

不僅僅是可怕的PANDEMIC，它還宣稱

ALMOST 400,000 LIVES, IT IS MASSIVE UNEMPLOYMENT, MILLIONS

40多萬人的生命，這是大規模的失業，百萬人的生命。

OF PEOPLE UNABLE TO FEED THEIR KIDS, PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING EIC

無力養活子女的人中，正在接受教育的人的比例

EVICTED, PEOPLE WHO CAN'T GO TO THE DOCTOR BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO

被驅逐的人不能去看醫生，因為他們沒有。

HEALTHCARE.

保健：

WHAT WE HAVE TO DO IS RESPOND TO THE PAIN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE

我們要做的是迴應美國人民的痛苦。

FEELING, WHICH IS ENORMOUS RIGHT NOW.

感受，這是巨大的現在。

PEOPLE ARE LOSING FAITH IN GOVERNMENT.

人們對政府失去了信心。

WE HAVE TO RESTORE THE FAITH BY SAYING, YOU KNOW WHAT?

我們必須通過說，你知道嗎？

WE HEAR YOUR PAIN AND WE'RE GOING TO RESPOND IN A BOLD

WE HEAR YOUR PAIN AND WE'RE GOING TO RESPOND IN A BOLD

MANNER AND, IN ADDITION TO THAT, PROBABLY IN A SECOND

此外，還可能有第二種方式。

RECONCILIATION BILL, WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH SOME OF THE SYSTEMIC,

我們必須處理一些系統性的問題。

LONG-TERM, ONGOING PROBLEMS FACING THIS COUNTRY.

該國面臨的長期、持續的問題。

PEOPLE CAN'T LIVE ON $10 AN HOUR.

人們不能生活在10美元一小時。

WE'VE GOT TO RAISE THE MINIMUM-WAGE TO A LIVING WAGE.

我們必須把最低工資提高到有生活保障的工資水平。

INSANE WE ARE THE ONLY MAJOR COUNTRY ON EARTH NOT TO HAVE

我們是地球上唯一一個沒有的大國

GUARANTEED HEALTHCARE TO ALL, OR HAVE PAID FAMILY AND MEDICAL

保證所有的人都能享受醫療服務，或者已經支付了家庭和醫療費用。

LEAVE.

離開。

WE'VE GOT TO DEAL WITH CLIMATE CHANGE, WITH COUNTRIES AROUND

我們必須應對氣候變化，與周邊國家一起應對氣候變化

THE WORLD, OR WE'RE NOT LEAVING MUCH TO OUR KIDS OR

世界，或者我們沒有留給我們的孩子或

GRANDCHILDREN.

孫子女：

IN OTHER WORDS, AT THIS PARTICULAR MOMENT IN HISTORY,

換句話說，在歷史上的這個特殊時刻。

CONGRESS WILL HAVE TO RISE UP AND BE EXTREMELY BOLD IN

大會必須奮起直追，以極大的膽識在

ADDRESSING THE MAJOR CRISES FACING WORKING FAMILIES AND THE

應對在職家庭面臨的重大危機，以及在職家庭的

MIDDLE CLASS AND I INTEND TO BE ACTIVE IN THAT PROCESS.

中產階級，我打算在這個過程中積極行動。

>> Stephen: PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN RELEASED

>> Stephen:當選主席比登發表的聲明

THE RESCUE PLAN.

拯救計劃。

CAN YOU GIVE US AN IDEA OF WHAT IT CONTAINS?

你能告訴我們它包含的內容嗎？

> IT'S A SERIOUS START.

> 這是一個重要的開始。

AMONG OTHER THINGS, IN LOOKING AGENT THE PANDEMIC, IT SAYS WE

除其他事項外，在尋找代理的PANDEMIC，它說，我們。

NEED TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE ALL OF THE VACCINE PRODUCTION WE

需要確保我們有所有的疫苗生產，我們。

POSSIBLY CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THE VACCINES OUT AROUND

可能可以確保我們得到的 疫苗了周圍的

THE COUNTRY.

國家：

WE NEED A LOT BETTER JOB DISTRIBUTING THOSE VACCINES,

我們需要一個更好的工作分配這些疫苗。

GETTING THE ARMS INTO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

把武器交給美國人民。

WE ARE NOT DOING THAT RIGHT NOW.

我們現在不這樣做。

BIDEN'S PLAN ALSO UNDERSTANDS THAT THE ECONOMY IS IN SHAMBLES

比登的計劃也明白，經濟已經陷入困境。

AND THAT WE NEED EMERGENCY RELIEF FOR WORKING FAMILIES.

我們需要為工作的家庭提供緊急救援。

HE IS SUPPORTIVE OF ANOTHER $1,400 ON TOP OF THE $600 WE

他支持在我們600美元的基礎上再增加1400美元。

PROVPROVIDED IN THE LAST BILL FO WORKING CLASS ADULTS AND THEIR

在上一年度的法案中為工作階層的成年人及其家人提供的

KIDS, EXTENDING UNEMPLOYMENT, MAKING SURE THAT SMALL

兒童、延長失業期、確保小型企業的發展。

BUSINESSES ARE ABLE TO SURVIVE.

企業有能力生存。

SO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE A LOT OF HARD LOOK

所以，你知道，我們要採取很多困難的檢查。

AT THE AT THE TAILS, BUT IT IS A VERY GOOD START IN ADDRESSING

在尾巴上，但這是一個非常好的開始，在解決。

THE PANDEMIC CRISIS AND THE ECONOMIC CRISIS WE NOW FACE.

我們現在面臨的泛濫危機和經濟危機。

>> Stephen: IF I COULD MAKE JUST TWO SUGGESTIONS, AND YOU

>> 斯蒂芬：如果我可以提出兩個建議，而你

CAN SAY YOU GO TO HELL, STEPHEN COLBERT, BUT MY TWO SUGGESTIONS

你可以說你要下地獄，斯蒂芬-科爾伯特，但我有兩個建議。

WOULD BE THIS, ONE, PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT VOTING RIGHTS

會是這樣的，一，請為投票權做一些事情。

BECAUSE THERE IS ONE PARTY IN THIS COUNTRY WHO WANTS TO GET

因為這個國家只有一個黨派想得到...

INTO OFFICE AND PULL UP THE LADDER BEHIND THEM, AND IT IS

進了辦公室，拉起他們身後的梯子，這就是。

VERY IMPORTANT THAT WHATEVER GAINS YOU MAKE ARE MAINTAINED BY

非常重要的是，您所獲得的任何收益都要由您自己來維持。

FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS OR TOSSED OUT BY FREE AND FAIR

自由公平的選舉或被自由公平的選舉所淘汰。

ELECTIONS, WHATEVER.

選舉，什麼的。

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DECIDE.

美國人民決定。

BUT IF OUR VOTING RIGHTS ARE NOT PROTECTED -- AND I DON'T KNOW

但如果我們的投票權不受保護 -- 我不知道。

WHAT CAN BE DONE ON A FEDERAL LEVEL --

在聯邦一級可以做什麼----是什麼？

>> A LOT CAN BE DONE, STEPHEN.

>> 很多事情都可以做，史蒂芬。

YOUR POINT IS WELL TAKEN.

你的觀點很有道理。

LOOK, AMONG THE MANY OTHER CRISES WE'RE FACING NOW,

聽著，在我們現在面臨的許多其他危機中，

OBVIOUSLY LED BY TRUMP, THERE IS A CHALLENGE, A FIERCE EFFORT TO

顯然，在特朗普的帶領下，有一個挑戰，一個巨大的努力，以實現

UNDERSTOOD MINE AMERICAN DEMOCRACY AND THE RESPONSE HAS

礦區的民主制度和反應情況

GOT TO BE THAT WE'RE CREATING A MORE VIBRANT DEMOCRACY WHICH

一定是我們正在創造一個更有活力的民主，其中

MEANS EVERYONE HAS A RIGHT TO VOTE.

意味著每個人都有投票的權利。

WE WON'T HAVE TO WAIT IN LINE, DEAL WITH VOTER SUPPRESSION.

我們不用排隊，處理好壓制選民的問題。

WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH CITIZENS UNITED AND THE ABILITY OF

我們必須處理好公民聯合起來的問題和公民的能力。

BILLIONAIRES TO BUY ELECTIONS.

億萬富翁購買選舉。

BUT HOW WE CREATE A SITUATION WHERE ALL THE PEOPLE WHO

但是，我們如何創造一種環境，讓所有的人都能在其中找到自己的位置。

UNDERSTAND THE POLITICAL PROCESS CAN VOTE AS EASILY AS POSSIBLE

理解政治程序可以儘可能輕鬆地投票

AND THOSE ARE FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS, ABSOLUTELY A VERY

這些都是自由和公平的選舉，絕對是一個非常好的選擇。

HIGH PRIORITY.

高優先級：

>> Stephen: BACK WITH MORE SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS.

>> 回到更多的BERNIE SANDERS議員。

♪♪♪ ♪♪♪

♪♪♪ ♪♪♪