Hetakesfive a gameandhe's almostat 90% fromtheline.
Sohe's alsoanextremelyefficientoffensiveplayer.
I wouldhaveSteph.
Wehavehimsix.
I'd havehim.
Sorry.
ESPNhavehimseventh.
I'd havehimsix.
Well, you'rewrong.
Maxand I wouldhaveStephCurrytopfiveintheMVPconversation.
Matteroffact, I dohaveStephCurryTopfiveinthe M V P conversation.
I actuallyhavehimrankedfourthbehindBigYokich, BigandBeatandLeBronJames.
Andhere's whywhenyoulookatStephCurryrightnowand I saidthisbeforetheseasonstarted, I thoughtStephCurrywasgonnahave a M V P typeseason, but I didn't knowhewasgonnadoittothisfashion.
Well, I'm notgonnaarguetoostrenuouslyagainstStephisthetopfive m.
V.
P.
Candidate, cause I thinkyoucouldmaketheargumentletmetellyouwhy I don't like I respectputtinginthetopfivebecauseoftheimpacthe's havingon a teamthatyou'rerightwouldbe a lotteryteamwithouthim.
I don't likethewholeguysteammatesagainstthem, whetheryouknowifthey'regood.
So a lotoftimesinan M V P conversation, yousay, Well, he's on a squadthat's nogood.
I'm gonnagivehimextrapoints.
It's notwho I orLeBronor M beadsfaultthatthey'replayingongoodteams.
Andmaybeifhisteamhad a betterwonlossrecordthancowiseteam.
GiventhatKawaiisas a muchbetterteamthanSteph, I wouldagreewithyou, buttheydon't AlltheseotherguysteamshavewonMawryes, becauseofthesupportingcast.
Sowhenyou'retryingtoisolatethevalueofftheplayeron a fence, I wouldsayifitwasjustinoffensiveconversation, Damn, youmightevensayStephisnumberoneonthislist.