Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • >>> HELLO EVERYONE.

  • OKAY.

  • WE HAVE A COLE ITEMS AT THE

  • TOP.

  • AS YOU KNOW, THE PRESIDENT IS

  • HEADED TO THE WEST COAST

  • TOMORROW.

  • I WANT TO GIVE YOU A QUICK

  • PREVIEW OF THE FIRST TRIP TO

  • OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

  • HE WILL HIGHLIGHT THE HISTORIC

  • GROWTH AND 8 MILLION JOBS

  • CREATED AS A RESULT OF HIS AND

  • DEMOCRAT ACTION INCLUDING E AME

  • BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW.

  • HE WILL VISIT THE PORTLAND

  • INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOMORROW,

  • TO HIGHLIGHT CRITICAL

  • INVESTMENTS, TO ENSURE

  • STRONGER, MORE RESILIENT

  • INFRASTRUCTURE LIKE AN

  • EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT RUNWAY AT

  • THE AIRPORT.

  • AND LOWERING COSTS ON EVYDAY

  • ITEMS BY ENSURING GOODS CAN

  • MOVE FASTER AND MORE

  • EFFICIENTLY.

  • GOVERNOR KATE BROWN AND THE

  • SENATORS AND CONGRESSMEN WILL

  • JOIN THE PRESIDENT AT THE

  • AIRPORT.

  • ON FRIDAY, HE WILL MARK EARTH

  • DAY IN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, BY

  • DIGGING TO THE NEEDS OF

  • BUILDING RESILIENCE IN THE CASE

  • OF WILDFIRE AND DEPLOYING CLEAN

  • ENERGY.

  • YOU WILL BE JOINED AT THE EVENT

  • BY GOVERNOR JAY INSLEE.

  • HE WILL DISCUSS HOW HE IS

  • FIGHTING TO BRING DOWN

  • PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS LIKE

  • INSULIN.

  • HE WILL BE JOINED BY THE

  • GOVERNOR AND CONGRESSMEN AND

  • SENATORS.

  • HE WILL CALL ON CONGRESS TO

  • PASS THE PLAN TO LOWER ENERGY

  • AND PRESCRIPTION COST.

  • HE WILL HIGHLIGHT ACTIONS HE

  • HAS TAKEN TO LOWER ENERGY AND

  • HEALTHCARE COSTS, GIVING

  • FAMILIES MORE BREATHING ROOM.

  • THESE ACTIONS FROM THE LAST FEW

  • WEEKS INCLUDHISTORIC

  • RELEASE FROM THE STRATEGIC

  • PETROLEUM RESERVE, EXTENDING

  • THE USE OF THE 15 GASOLINE.

  • TAKING 100 ACTIONS TO SAVE

  • FAMILIES MORE THAN $100

  • ANNUALLY ON UTILITY BILLS AND

  • NALING STANDARDS FOR CARS

  • AND TRUCKS TO ALLOW DRIVERS TO

  • TRAVEL FURTHER ON EVERY GALLON

  • OF FUEL.

  • WE ARE FIXING THE FAMILY GLITCH

  • IN THE ACA AND REDUCING THE

  • BURDEN OF MEDICAL DEBT.

  • FREEZING STUDENT LOAN PAYMENTS

  • AND HELPING 3.6 MILLION STUDENT

  • LOANORRORS MOVING CLOSER TO

  • DEBT FORGIVENESS.

  • YOU KNOW ON THAT FRONT,

  • YESTERDAY, YOU MAY HAVE SEEN AS

  • PART OF THE ADMINISTRATION'S

  • COMMITMENT TO SUB OR STUDENT

  • LOAN BORROWERS AND GETTING THEM

  • THE RELIEF THEY ARE ELIGIBLE

  • FOR, THE DEPARTMENT OF

  • EDUCATION ANNOUNCED CHANGES

  • THAT WILL MOVE MORE THAN 3.6

  • MILLION BORROWERS CLOSER TO

  • STUDENT DEBT FORGIVENESS AND

  • MAKING 40,000 BORROWERS

  • ELIGIBLE FOR THE IMMEDIATE

  • DISCHARGE OF THEIR LOANS UNDER

  • THE PUBLIC SERVICE LOAN

  • FORGIVENESS PROGRAM AND PROVIDE

  • IMMEDIATE RELIEF TO THOUSANDS

  • OF OUR WORKS.

  • WE ARE DOING THIS BY FIXING

  • LONG-STANDING FAILURES IN THE

  • INCOME DRIVEN REPAYMENT

  • PROGRAM, OR IDR.

  • THE INCOME DRIVEN REPAYMENT IS

  • ONE OF THE BEST OPTIONS FOR

  • BORROWERS TOWARD TACKLING

  • STUDENT LOAN DEBT.

  • FOR TOO LONG, THE SYSTEM FOR

  • TRACKING PAYMENTS HAS BEEN

  • BROKEN.

  • THERE WERE SIGNIFICANT FLAWS

  • ADJUSTING BORROWERS THAT WERE

  • ENTIED TO FORGIVENESS WERE

  • MISSING OUT ON THE PROGRESS

  • TOWARD DEBT FORGIVENESS.

  • THESE STEPS INCLUDE MAKING SURE

  • THAT ANY MONTH IN WHICH

  • BORROWERS MADE PAYMENTS WILL

  • COUNT TOWARD IDR FORGIVENESS

  • REGARDLESS OF THE REPAYMENT

  • PLAN AND ANY BORROWER WHO HAS

  • MADE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF

  • PAYMENTS FOR IDR FORGIVENESS

  • BASED ON THE REVISION WILL

  • RECEIVE LOAN CANCELLATION

  • AUTOMATICALLY.

  • ADDITIONALLY, WE KNOW IN THE

  • PAST, LOAN SERVICE PLACE

  • BORROWERS THAT WERE STRUGGLING

  • TO MANAGE REPAENT INTO

  • FORBEARANCE IS WITHOUT GIVING

  • THEM ADEQUATE INFORMATION ABOUT

  • ALTERNATIVES.

  • THAT MEANT, WHILE THE PAYMENTS

  • WERE DUE, THE INTERESTS

  • CONTINUE TO ACCRUE AND

  • BORROWERS DID NOT GET CREDIT

  • TOWARD FORGIVENESS.

  • THIS IS NOT THE BEST OPTION FOR

  • BORROWERS, PARTICULARLY WHEN

  • THEY ARE ELIGIBLE FOR AN

  • ECONOMIC HARDSHIP DEFERMENT OR

  • A ZERO PAYMENT IDR PLAN.

  • MAKE SURE THAT THE EXISTING

  • BORROWERS ARE NOT PERMANENTLY

  • HARD HARMED BY THE FAILURES,

  • THEY WILL APPLY CREDIT FOR

  • BORROWERS THAT ENDED UP IN THE

  • LONG-TERM FORBEARANCE.

  • THESE ARE FORBEARANCES OF 12 OR

  • MORE CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OR 36

  • OR MORE TOTAL MONT.

  • THESE ARE IMPORTANT STEPS ON

  • THAT FRONT.

  • THE LAST THING I WANT TO NOTE,

  • YOU MAY HAVE SEEN THIS, BUT

  • THIS MORNING, THE DEPARTMENT OF

  • TREASURY SANCTIONED THE TRANS-

  • CAPITAL BANK, A KEY RUSSIAN

  • COMMERCIAL BANK OFFERING

  • SERVICES TO BANKS GLOBALLY, TO

  • EVADE INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS

  • AND MORE THAN 40 INDIVIDUALS

  • AND ENTITIES THAT ARE PART OF

  • THE RUSSIAN SANCTIONS EVASION

  • NETWORK LED BY A RUSSIAN

  • OLIGARCH.

  • WE HAVE SANCTIONS ON THE

  • VIRTUAL PRINTING MINING

  • INDUSTRY THAT OPERATES SERVER

  • FARMS.

  • THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE IMPOSED

  • VISA RESTRICTIONS HAPPEN ON

  • MORE THAN 600 INDIVIDUALS IN

  • RISK WANTS TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS

  • ABUSES BY RUSSIA AND BELARUS.

  • THIS IS PART OF THE STEPPED-UP

  • EFFORT TO CRACK DOWN ON THOSE

  • ATTEMPTING TO EVADE OUR

  • PRECEDENTED SANCTIONS.

  • WITH THAT, WILL YOU KICK US

  • OFF?

  • >> A COUPLE QUESTIONS ON

  • MASKING, THE PRESIDENT SAID

  • YESTERDAY THAT PEOPLE SHOULD

  • DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHETHER

  • NOT WEAR A MASK ON AIRPLANES.

  • I'M WONDERING WHETHER HIS

  • COMMENTS WAS INTENDED [

  • INDISCERNIBLE - LOW VOLUME ] TO

  • TAKE AWAY THE MINISTRATION FROM

  • MANDATES OR PERSONAL

  • RESPONSIBILITY?

  • >> THE PRESIDENT ANSWERED THE

  • QUESTION LITERALLY.

  • THAT MEANS RIGHT NOW, AS WE

  • KNOW, WE ARE NOT IMPLEMENTING

  • THE MASK MANDATE DUE TO THE

  • COURT ORDER, WHICH WE DISAGREE

  • WITH.

  • HE IS STILL ABIDING BY CDC

  • GUIDANCE.

  • WE DO RECOMMEND THAT AMERICANS

  • DO THAT ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

  • THEY RECOMMEND PEOPLE WORE

  • MASKS ON AIRPLANES.

  • ON AIR FORCE ONE, WE ALL WEAR

  • MASKS ON THE PLANE WE TRAVELED

  • TO NEW HAMPSHIRE.

  • PEOPLE ARE NOT LEGALLY BOUND TO

  • WEAR MASKS.

  • IT IS POINT IN TIME WHERE IT

  • IS UP TO PEOPLE.

  • IT IS THEIR CHOICE IN THAT

  • REGARD.

  • >> ONE OTHER QUESTION ON A

  • DIFFERENT TOPIC, ARE YOU ABLE

  • TO CONFIRM REPORTS THAT THE

  • PRESIDENT IS REPLACING THE

  • ACTING ATF DIRECTOR WITH

  • ANOTHER GENTLEMAN THAT WILL BE

  • THE ACTING ATF DIRECTOR UNTIL

  • THE NOMINEE IS CONFIRMED BY THE

  • SENATE?

  • >> YES, I KNOW THERE ARE

  • REPORTS ABOUT THIS OUT THERE.

  • I WILL SAY, THE PRESIDENT IS

  • MAKING THAT DESIGNATION UNDER

  • THE VACANCIES REFORM ACT.

  • IT SAYS THAT ANY PRESIDENT, AND

  • ONLY THE PRESIDENT MAY DIRECT A

  • PERSON THAT SERVES IN AN OFFICE

  • FOR WHICH THE APPOINTMENT IS

  • REQUIRED TO BE MADE BY THE

  • PRESIDENT, BY AND WITH THE

  • CONSENT OF THE SENATE TO

  • PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS AND

  • DUTIES OF THE VACANT OFFICE

  • MPORILY.

  • WE ARE ADVOCATING FOR AND

  • PUSHING FOR IS EMINENTLY

  • QUALIFIED NOMINEE TO BE

  • CONFIRMED AND HAVE AN ATM --

  • ATF CONFIRMED DIRECTOR FOR THE

  • FIRST TIME IN YEARS.

  • >> ON THE LONG-RANGE MISSILE

  • TEST, HE SAID THIS IS MEANT TO

  • PROVIDE FOOD FOR THOUGHT FOR

  • THOSE THAT ARE THREAT TO

  • RUSSIA.

  • CAN YOU TALK IS HOW WE ARE

  • INTERPRETING THIS AND HOW YOU

  • VIEW THIS AS A WARNING OR

  • THREAT IN ANY WAY?

  • >> WE WERE NOTIFIED UNDER THE

  • START TREATY.

  • FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, THEY

  • PROVIDED ADVANCED NOTICE OF THE

  • LAUNCH.

  • THEY SAID THEY HAD A PLANNED

  • TEST.

  • THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DID

  • WE NOT DOING THIS AS A THREAT

  • TO THE UNITED STATES OR ALLIES.

  • THE TIME AND SCOPE DO NOT

  • INFLUENCE OUR APOACHTO

  • COUNTERING THE FURTHER INVASION

  • OF UKRAINE.

  • IT WAS NOTICED THROUGH THE

  • PROPER PROCESS.

  • >> ON THE EXPECTED ANNOUNCEMENT

  • OF ANOTHER ROUND OF ASSISTANCE

  • TO UKRAINE.

  • CAN YOU WALK US WHEN HE'S

  • CIVICS ON WHEN THAT IS

  • HAPPENING?

  • BIG PICTURE ON THIS, THE U.S.

  • HAS GIVEMORE THAN $2.5

  • BILLION SINCE THE WAR STARTED.

  • HOW LONG CAN THE U.S. EXPECT TO

  • CONTINUE TO BANKROLL SO MUCH OF

  • THE WAR WAX

  • >> THERE ARE COUPLE QUESTIONS

  • THERE.

  • LET ME DO MY BEST TO ANSWER

  • THEM.

  • FIRST, WE ARE WORKING AROUND

  • THE CLOCK TO PROVIDE SECURITY

  • ASSISTANCE TO UKRAINE.

  • TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF HOW

  • THAT ASSISTANCE HAS AND FLOWING

  • OVER THE LAST FEW DAYS, I THINK

  • I GAVE AN UPDATE THE OTHER DAY.

  • FIVE FLIGHTS WITH MILIRY

  • ASSISTANCE HAVE ARRIVED IN THE

  • REGION OF THE LAST FEW DAYS.

  • MORE THAN HALF A DOZEN FLIGHTS

  • FROM THE UNITED STATES WILL

  • LAND IN THE REGION SHORTLY,

  • WITH ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT.

  • AS WE LOOK AT PROVIDING THIS

  • ASSISTANCE, I WILL GO BACK TO

  • THE FIRST PART OF YOUR

  • QUESTION, WHAT WE TRIED TO DO,

  • WE MADE THE STRATEGIC DESION

  • GIVEN WE HAVE SEEN RUSSIA

  • REPOSITION THEIR TROOPS AND

  • THEIR MILITARY TO THE EASTERN

  • PART OF UKRAINE, TO FIGHT A

  • DIFFERENT KIND OF WAR, ON THE

  • GROUND.

  • IT WILL BE MORE SHOOTING BACK

  • AND FORTH THROUGH LONG-RANGE.

  • WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH

  • UKRAINIANS AND UKRAINIAN

  • MILITARY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT

  • KIND OF SECURITY ASSISTANCE

  • THEY NEED FOR THIS STAGE IN THE

  • WAR.

  • THAT HAS INCLUDED AN INCREASE,

  • AS YOU HAVE SEEN IN ARTILLERY

  • AND AMMUNITION, AND WEAPONS

  • LIKE HOWITZERS AND OTHERS THAT

  • CAN DO THESE SORT OF THINGS

  • WITH LONG-RANGE FIGHTING THAT

  • WE ARE SEEING, OR WE ANTICIPATE

  • WILL HAPPEN IN THIS STAGE OF

  • THE WAR.

  • WE HAVE BEEN EXPEDITING THE

  • ASSISTANCE TO THE GROUND OVER

  • THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, TO

  • ENSURE THEY ARE PREPARED AS HIS

  • POION THE WAR IS STARTING.

  • IT IS NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE

  • USING ALL OF IT IN SEVEN DAYS,

  • BUT BECAUSE WE WANT THEM TO

  • HAVE ALL OF THE EQUIPMENT AS

  • QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, AS THEY

  • PREPARE TO FIGHT THE WAR ON THE

  • GROUND.

  • IN TERMS OF ASSISTANCE, AND

  • WHAT WE ARE PREPARING WITH THE

  • REPORTS I HAVE BEEN OUT THERE,

  • I WILL SAY, I EXPECT WE WILL

  • HAVE MORE INFORMATION SOON.

  • I'VE NOTHING TO PREVIEW AT THIS

  • POINT IN TIME.

  • I WOULD NOTE, OUT OF THE $3.5

  • BILLION AND DRAW TOWN AUTHORITY

  • THAT CONGRESS ALLOCATED, WE

  • HAVE USED $2.4 BILLION SUPPORT

  • TO PROVIDE UKRAINE WHAT THEY

  • NEED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.

  • THERE IS MORE THAT APPROVED,

  • DRAWDOWN ASSISTANCE THAT WE CAN

  • PROVIDE.

  • WE ARE WORKING TO EXPEDITE, IN

  • SHORT, IT IS MEETING THE NEEDS

  • THEY HAVE AT THIS LATE IN THE

  • WAR.

  • >> A COUPLE QUICK ONES ON

  • MASKS.

  • THE DOJ SAID YESTERDAY THAT

  • THEY WOULD DECIDE ON WHETHER

  • NOT TO APPEAL THE RULING, BASED

  • ON WHAT THE CDC SAYS THEY NEED

  • OR DON'T NEED.

  • IS THE WHITE HOUSE, OR THE

  • CABINET INVOLVED IN ANY WAY IN

  • THAT DECISION-MAKING PROCESS?

  • >> WE ARE ENTIRELY ABLE TO BE

  • PART OF THE DISCUSSION.

  • RIGHT NOW, WE ARE DEFERRING TO

  • THE CDC ON WHAT THEY BELIEVE IS

  • NEEDED AT THIS MOMENT.

  • THEY OBVIOUSLY PUT IN PLACE A

  • TWO WEEK EXTENSION, BECAUSE

  • THEY FELT THEY NEEDED THAT TO

  • TAKE A LOOK AT THE DATA, GIVEN

  • THAT WE HAVE SEEN A RISE IN

  • CASES.

  • WE DO ANTICIPATE TO HEAR MORE

  • FROM THEM SOON ON THE ASK TO

  • HAVE THE TIME, WHICH WE THING

  • IS WARRANTED.

  • THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS

  • INDICATED THAT THEY ULD

  • APPEAL, NOT JUST BECAUSE THEY

  • THINK IT IS REASONABLE TO HAVE

  • THE ADDITIONAL TIME TO LOOK AT

  • IT, BUT BECAUSE THEY THINK THAT

  • THE CURRENT AND FUTURE HEALTH

  • CRISES, WE WANT TO PRESERVE THE

  • AUTHORITY FOR THE CDC TO HAVE

  • IN THE FUTURE.

  • >> WN HESAID A MOMENT AGO,

  • IT IS A PERSONAL CHOICE ON

  • WHETHER PEOPLE DECIDE TO PUT A

  • MASK ON OR NOT ON PLANES.

  • DOES THE MESSAGING STILL

  • REFLECT A SHIFT FOR YOU ALL,

  • AND TO SOME DEGREE A

  • CAPITULATION TO THE MOOD OF THE

  • PUBLIC ABOUT WANTING TO BE OVER

  • THE PANDEMIC?

  • OR THOSE THAT HAVE POLITICIZED

  • THE WEARING A MASK'S IN THE

  • FIRST PLACE?

  • WE RECOMMEND EVERYONE WEAR

  • MASKS ON PLANES.

  • WITH THE PRESIDENT WAS SPEAKING

  • TO IS BECAUSE WE ARE NOT

  • CURRENTLY IMPLEMENTING THE MASK

  • MANDATE, IT IS NOT A

  • REQUIREMENT.

  • PEOPLE CAN CHOOSE, EVEN AS WE

  • RECOMMEND APPEARED TO BE CLEAR,

  • WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT

  • EVERYONE WEAR A MASK COMPLAINS.

  • THAT IS WHAT THE CDC RECOMMENDS

  • AND THAT IS THE PUBLIC HEALTH

  • GUIDANCE WE ARE FOLLOWING.

  • I KNOW THIS IS OFTEN SAID,

  • BECAUSE IT WAS THE VIDEO OF

  • PEOPLE ON PLANES, ONE PLANE

  • TAKING OFF THEIR MASKS, PUBLIC

  • POLLING DOES NOT SHOW THAT

  • THERE IS A UNIVERSAL VIEW OF

  • PEOPLE GETTING RID OF MASS.

  • THAT IS NOT WHAT THE PUBLIC

  • POLLING SHOWS.

  • IT DOESN'T MATTER TO US.

  • WE ARE MAKING OUR DECISIONS

  • BASED ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND

  • DATA, WHAT THE CDC IS

  • RECOMMENDING.

  • THAT IS NOT THE UNIVERSAL VIEW

  • OF THE PUBLIC.

  • >> GO AHEAD.

  • >> UKRAINIAN COMMANDER AND

  • MARIUPOL, HE SAYS HIS FORCES

  • AND CIVILIANS MAY ONLY HAVE

  • HOURS TO MAKE IT OUT ALIVE.

  • HE HAS MADE THIS DIRECTLY TO

  • THE PRESIDENT FOR THE U.S. TO

  • SOMEHOW BE INVOLVED IN

  • EXTRACTING PEOPLE FROM THE

  • AREA.

  • DO YOU KNOW IF THAT IS A WEST

  • OF THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF?

  • CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH, CAN

  • THE U.S. BE DIRECTLY INVOLVED

  • AT THIS WEHT IN MAKING THAT

  • HAPPEN OR MAKING THAT HAPPEN?

  • >> WE HAVE SEEN THE CRIES FOR

  • HELP AND THE ASKS FOR HELP.

  • WE ARE URGING THE RUSSIAN

  • GOVERNMENT TO DO THE RIGHT

  • THING ANGUANTEES A PASSAGE

  • FOR ANY CIVILIANS, OR OTHERS

  • THAT WISH TO LEAVE THIS EDDIE.

  • WE ENCOURAGE THEM TO ALLOW

  • DELIVERIES OF HUMANITARIAN AID

  • LIKE IN MEDICINE AND SAFE

  • PASSAGE FOR VOLUNTEERS TO HELP

  • THOSE IN NEED.

  • I DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL

  • UPDATES FROM HERE.

  • >> WITH THE PRESIDENT, WHETHER

  • HE WOULD VISIT UKRAINE, YOU

  • HAVE SET A COUPLE TIMES,

  • CURRENTLY THERE ARE NO PLANS TO

  • DO THAT.

  • YESTERDAY, WHEN HE WAS ASKED,

  • WHEN HE ASKED IF HE WAS GOING,

  • HE SAID HE WASN'T SURE.

  • AS A TRIP TOTALLY OFF THE TABLE

  • FOR HIM?

  • >> NOTHING CHANGED IN OUR

  • ASSESSMENT.

  • AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE, IF

  • ANYONE WERE TO VISIT UKRAINE

  • FROM THE UNITED STATES, IT'S

  • NOT SOMETHING WE WOULD ANNOUNCE

  • OR CONFIRM IN ADVANCE OR GIVE

  • DETAILS ON WHO, IF, WHEN, FOR

  • SECURITY REASONS.

  • ANYONE WHO HAS TRAVELED TO A

  • WAR ZONE WITH THE PRESIDENT

  • WERE A VICE PRESIDENT, WE ARE

  • FAMILIAR WITH THAT POLICY.

  • >> WAS HE TRYING TO INDICATE?

  • >> NOTHING CHANGED ON OUR

  • PLANS.

  • >> THERE ARE SO MANY HORRIFIC

  • IMAGES COMING OUT OF UKRAINE.

  • THEY ARE READILY AVAILABLE WITH

  • PHOTOGRAPHS AND VIDEOS OF

  • CIVILIANS.

  • AS WE ENTER THE THIRD MONTH OF

  • THIS CONFLICT, CAN YOU WALK US

  • THROUGH AND GIVE US A SENSE OF

  • HOW THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN

  • PROCESSING THESE IMAGES?

  • WHO DOES HE TALK TO?

  • WHAT DOES HE LEAN ON AS HE

  • PROCESSES IMAGES COMING FROM

  • WHAT HE HIMSELF IS CALLED A

  • GENOCIDE?

  • >> I WILL SAY, THE PRESIDENT IS

  • PROCESSING THESE IMAGES AS MANY

  • AMERICANS ARE, WITH HORROR AND

  • SADNESS, AND WITH FEAR FOR THE

  • PEOPLE OF UKRAINE AND THE

  • FAMILIES AND THE CHILDREN, FOR

  • THE INNOCENT CIVILIANS AT RISK.

  • OBVIOUSLY, THE CONFLICT IS

  • CONSUMING A GREAT DEAL OF HIS

  • TIME, AS MUCH AS HE IS WORKING

  • ON A RANGE OF OTHER PRIORITIES

  • HERE.

  • HE IS CONSUMING THEM, AS MANY

  • PEOPLE ARE, AS AMERICANS OUT

  • THERE WATCHING OFF OF THE

  • NETWORKS, IT IS EMOTIONAL.

  • WE ARE WATCHING THE IMAGES, IT

  • IS VERY RAW FOR PEOPLE,

  • INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT.

  • YOU ARE SEEING PEOPLE SUFFERING

  • AT THE HANDS OF A DICTATOR THAT

  • IS BRUTALLY TARGETING

  • CIVILIANS.

  • >> E FACT THAT THE U.S. IS

  • COMMITTING HEAVIER WEAPON

  • SYSTEMS INDICATING THERE IS

  • LESS RISK OF RETALIATION FROM

  • RUSSIA?

  • >> THE TYPES OF WEAPONS SYSTEMS

  • WE ARE PROVIDING OUR REFLECTION

  • OF THE CONVERSATIONS HAPPENING

  • WITH UKRAINIAN LEADERSHIP AND

  • MILITARY ABOUT WHAT THEY NEED

  • IN THIS STAGE OF THE WAR.

  • BECAUSE THE STATE OF THE WORD

  • IS DIFFERENT, IT WILL BE MORE

  • ON THE GROUND, AND MORE BACK-

  • AND-FORTH, LONG-RANGE FIGHTING,

  • THERE ARE DIFFERENT KINDS OF

  • WEAPONS THEY NEED.

  • THEY NEED MORE ARTILLERY AND

  • AMMUNITION.

  • IT IS A DIFFERENT WAR THAN IT

  • WAS IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE

  • COUNTRY.

  • >> YOU SAID EARLIER, THAT THE

  • GOVERNMENT WILL CONTINUE TO

  • MOTOR,WHATER SENT OVER IS

  • MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE WAR.

  • HOW IS THAT MONITORING

  • HAPPENING?

  • I KNOW THERE ARE A LOT OF

  • RUSSIANS ABOUT HOW WAS THE

  • MONEY SPENT?

  • HOW WAS THE EQUIP ME USE IN

  • WHOSE HANDS ARE IT IN?

  • FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS AND

  • YEARS, WAS THIS WORTH THE COST?

  • HOW IS THAT BEING DONE NOW ASK

  • >> LOOK, IF YOU ASK MOST

  • AMERICANS, IF YOU ASK MEMBERS

  • OF CONGRESS AND PEOPLE OF THIS

  • COUNTRY WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO DO

  • NOW IS TO EQUIP AND PROVIDE THE

  • TYPE OF SUPPT AND ASSISTANCE,

  • INCLUDING MILITARY EQUIPMENT TO

  • HELP THEM CONTINUE TO FIGHT.

  • THEY CAN WIN IN SOME CASES LIKE

  • THEY DID IN THE BATTLE OF KYIV.

  • THAT IS THE FOCUS.

  • WE COORDINATE VERY CLOSELY WITH

  • TO DISTRIBUTE AMONGST THE

  • MILITARY.

  • >> THERE WAS SUPPORT IN THE

  • GETTING OF THE IRAQ WAR AND

  • AFGHANISTAN, AND THEN THERE WAS

  • YEARS TRYING TO RE-SPEND AND

  • RETRACE THE SPENDING.

  • THERE IS NO MECHANISM IN PLACE

  • TO DO THAT?

  • >> I WOULD POINT YOU TO THE

  • DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

  • I WOULD NOTE THAT THIS IS

  • DIFFERENT BEING THAT WE DON'T

  • U.S. SOLDIERS ON THE GROUND.

  • OBVIOUSLY EQUIPMENT, REDUCING

  • WASTE AND ABUSE IS IMPORTANT.

  • ESTIMATE GIVEN THAT RUSSIA HAS

  • LAUNCHED THE INTERCONTINENTAL

  • BALLISTIC MISSILE, IT WILL WE

  • DO OURS?

  • >> WHAT IS THE LATEST ON THE

  • LATEST CHEMICAL WEAPON ATTACK?

  • >> THERE IS NO NEW ASSESSMENT

  • FROM HERE.

  • STUPID WE KNOW HOW MUCH LONGER

  • THAT WILL TAKE?

  • >>HAT TALKED ABOUT THE

  • TIME, I KNOW MY COLLEAGUES AT

  • THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND

  • THE STATE SAID WE DON'T HAVE A

  • TEAM ON THE GROUND.

  • IT IS DIFFICULT TO ASSESS.

  • THIS IS SOMETHING WE ARE

  • CONTINUING TO WORK TO DO.

  • WE DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL

  • UPDATES OR CONFIRMATION.

  • >> I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT

  • MARIJUANA POCY.

  • ESIDENT JOE BIDEN IS THE

  • CANDIDATE, PROMISED TO

  • DECRIMINALIZE MARIJUANA.

  • WHEN WILL THAT HAPPEN?

  • >> THE PRESIDENT CONTINUES TO

  • BELIEVE THAT NOBODY SHOULD BE

  • IN JAIL BECAUSE OF DRUG USE.

  • I DON'T HAVE AN UPDATE HERE.

  • AREWORKING WITH CONGRESS.

  • WHAT I WILL SAY ON MARIJUANA IS

  • WE HAVE MADE SOME PROGRESS ON

  • THE PROMISES.

  • THE DA ISSUED ITS FIRST

  • LICENSES TO COMPANIES TO

  • CULTIVATE MARIJUANA FOR

  • RESEARCH PURPOSES AFTER YEARS

  • OF DELAY DURING THE PRIOR

  • ADMINISTRATION.

  • IT IS A KEY STEP IN PROMOTING

  • RESEARCH.

  • ROBS THE AMOUNT AND

  • QUALITY OF CANNABIS AVAILABLE

  • FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

  • ADDITIONALLY, THE PRESIDENT IS

  • DOING THE CLEMENCY POWERS.

  • THAT IS SOMETHING HE TALKED

  • ABOUT ON THE CAMPAIGN AND

  • REMAINS COMMITTED TO TAKING

  • ACTION ON.

  • TO MAKE YOUR MATES COMMITTED TO

  • WHAT HE SAID DURING THE

  • CAMPAIGN THAT PEOPLE CHARGED

  • WITH MARIJUANA RELATED

  • OFFENSES, NUMBER ONE, EVERYBODY

  • GETS OUT, RECORD EXPUNGED?

  • HE IS REVIEWING THE CLEMENCY

  • POWERS.

  • THAT IS WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE.

  • I DON'T HAVE ANY UPDATES OR

  • PREVIEWS ON THAT.

  • >> A QUESTION ABOUT

  • IMMIGRATION, DOES THE ESENT

  • HAVE CONFIDENCE THAT THE VICE

  • PRESIDENT CAN GET TO THE BOTTOM

  • OF THE ROOT CAUSES OF

  • MIGRATION?

  • MAKE ABSOLUTELY DOES.

  • HE IS GRATEFUL FOR HER WORK AND

  • DOING EXACTLY THAT.>> WHY?

  • WHY DOES HE HAVE CONFIDENCE?

  • WOULD YOU LIKE AN UPDATE ON A

  • COUPLE THINGS WE'VE DONE?

  • WHAT GIVES THE PRESENT

  • CONFIDENCE WHEN HE SEES THAT

  • MARCH 2022 HAS 28% MORE MIGRANT

  • COUNTERS AT THE ORDER THAN IN

  • MARCH 2021 WHEN SHE GOT THE

  • ASSIGNMENT TO MAKE YESTERDAY

  • ABOUT ROOT CAUSES, LET'S

  • ADDRESS THAT FIRST AND WHAT THE

  • VICE PRESIDENT AND OTHER

  • MEMBERS HAVE BEEN WORKING HAVE

  • BEEN DOING.

  • WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITHTHE

  • SORTS SOURCE AND TRANSIT

  • COUNTRIES TO FACILITATE THE

  • QUICK RETURN OF INDIVIDUALS

  • THAT PREVIOUSLY RESIDED IN

  • THOSE COUNTRIES, AS WELL AS TO

  • STEM MIGRATION IN ITS STATE.

  • SOME OF THAT IS GETTING

  • AGREEMENTS WITH PARTNER

  • COUNTRIES ON MIGRATION MATTERS.

  • THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THE VICE

  • PRESIDENT HAS BEEN DEEPLY

  • ENGAGED WITH.

  • I WOULD NOTE THE SECRETARY HAS

  • WORKED WITH HER ON THIS,

  • TRAVELING TO COSTA RICA, WHERE

  • HE JOINED THE PRESIDENT OF

  • COSTA RICA, IN ANNOUNCING A

  • BILATERAL IMMIGRATION AGREEMENT

  • TO MANAGE MIGRANT FLOWS AND

  • PROMOTE ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE

  • REGION.

  • WE ARE MAINTAINING A CLOSE

  • PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE

  • GOVERNMENT OF MEXICO AND THE

  • UNITED STATES FOR REGULAR

  • MIGRATION.

  • ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES IS

  • WORKING WITH COUNTRIES IN THE

  • REGION TO TAKES NAPS AND HAVE

  • PARTNERSHIPS TO HAVE PEOPLE

  • SENTBACK TO THE REGION, AS

  • NEEDED.

  • THE LAST ONE, IS THE PRESIDENT,

  • ARE YOU HAVING DISCUSSION WITH

  • ADVISORS ABOUT DELAYING THE

  • REMOVAL OF TITLE 42?

  • >> AGAIN, I REMIND EVERYONE,

  • TITLE 42 IS NOT IN IMMIGRATION

  • AUTHORITY.

  • I WILL GET YOUR QUESTION, I

  • PROMISE.

  • IT IS A PUBLIC HEALTH

  • AUTHORITY.

  • CONGRESS GAVE THE CDC AUTHORITY

  • ON WHAT IT SHOULD BE LIFTED.

  • RIGHT NOW, WE ARE PLANNING AND

  • PREPARING FOR THE END OF TITLE

  • 42 ON MAY . I WOULD SAY, THERE

  • THE PRESIDENT AGREES THAT

  • IMMIGRATION IN OUR COUNTRY IS

  • ROGAN.

  • IT IS A SYSTEM THAT IS BROKEN.

  • THERE IS A RANGE OF IDEAS OUT

  • THERE IN CONGRESS, DEMOCRATS,

  • REPUICAN ANDOTHERS, SOME

  • WHO SUPPORT A DELAY OF TITLE 42

  • OF LIMITATION, AND SOME WHO

  • STRONGLY OPPOSE IT.

  • WE HAVE A RANGE OF OTHER IDEAS

  • TO REFORM IMMIGRATION.

  • THIS WOULD WIRE CONGRESSIONAL

  • ACTION.

  • >> ON TITLE 42, EXCUSE ME, IT

  • IS ALLERGIES.

  • >> WE UNDERSTAND.

  • WE HAVE BEEN REPORTING THAT THE

  • ADMINISTRATION IS PROJECTING A

  • BIG BUDGET SHORTFALL FOR [

  • INDISCERNIBLE ] SHOULD TITLE 42

  • BE LIFTED.

  • IS THERE A PLAN FOR HOTO GET

  • ADDITIONAL FUNDING THAT WILL BE

  • NEEDED TO HANDLE IMMIGRANTS

  • COMING INTO THE COUNTRY OF

  • TITLE 42 IS LIFTED?

  • WILL YOU NEED FUNDING FROM

  • CONGRESS, CAN YOU DIVERT

  • FUNDING FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE?

  • >> WHAT DHS SAID LAST MONTH AS

  • THEY EXPECT THE CURRENT FUNDING

  • LEVELS WILL NOT BE SUFFICIE

  • MEET OPERATIONAL NEEDS.

  • HAVE A NUMBER OF OPERATIONS

  • AVAILABLE FOR THE CONFERENCE OF

  • STRATEGY INCLUDING PRIORITIZING

  • AND REALLOCATING EXISTING

  • FUNDING.

  • THEY CAN REQUEST ADDITIONAL

  • SUPPORT FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES,

  • NECESSARY.

  • THEY CAN ENGAGE WITH CONGRESS

  • ON THAT DISCUSSION.

  • I WOULD NOTE, AS PART OF THIS,

  • AS WE PREPARE FOR THE

  • IMPLEMENTATION OF THE END OF

  • TITLE 42, THERE ARE A RANGE OF

  • STEPS THAT WE CAN TAKE TO

  • PREPARE FOR THAT, INCLUDING

  • SURGING RESOURCES AND DEPLOYING

  • RESOURCES TO ADDRESS THE

  • INCREASED VOLUMES LIKE MOVING

  • AGENCIES AND AGENTS.

  • WE CAN MOVE PERSONNEL TO

  • RAPIDLY DECOMPRESS POINTS

  • ACROSS THE BORDER.

  • IT ENTAILS THE DEPLOYMENT OF

  • COVID-19 MITIGATION EFFORTS,

  • INCLUDING THE USE OF CONTINUED

  • PPE AND PROVIDING COVID-19

  • VACCINES.

  • IT INCLUDES EXPANDING THE

  • EFFORTS TO COVER MIGRANTS IN

  • CUSTODY.

  • THERE ARE A RANGE OF STEPS IN

  • THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT THE

  • SENATOR IS TESTIFYING TO ON THE

  • HILL.

  • WHAT THEY DID SAY AT THE TIME,

  • WHEN WE ANNOUNCED THIS IS WE

  • EXPE THE CURRENT FUNDING

  • LEVELS WOULD NOT BE SUFFICIENT.

  • THERE IS A RANGE OF WAYS TO

  • ADDRESS THAT.

  • >> WE ARE JUST ABOUT A MONTH

  • AWAY FROM THIS BEING LIFTED.

  • IF THE ADMINISTRATION DOES NOT

  • FEEL LIKE THAT PLAN IS IN LEASE

  • YET, WOULD THAT BE A REASON TO

  • DELAY LIFTING TITLE 42?

  • THE MINUTE WE PROPOSED A PLAN.

  • THAT IS THE PLAN BEING

  • IMPLEMENTED.

  • IN TERMS OF ANY IDEAS TO

  • ADDRESS IMMIGRATION, INCLUDING

  • THE DELAY OF TITLE 42 WOULD

  • INVOLVE CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.

  • >> MORE THAN 3000UKRAIANS

  • WERE PROCESSED ALONG THE

  • SOUTHERN BORDER GOING TO MEXICO

  • TO TRY TO GET INTO THE U.S..

  • THAT NUMBER IS NOW EXPECTED TO

  • INCREASE.

  • DOES THE ADMINISTRATION HAVE

  • ANY PLANS TO ANNOUNCE A PROGRAM

  • THAT WOULD MAKE IT EASI FOR

  • UKRAINIANS THAT HAVE FAMILY

  • TIES IN THE U.S. TO BE

  • EXPEDITED?

  • >> WE ARE WORKING ON THAT.

  • WE HAVE ANNOUNCED, THE

  • PRESIDENT ANNOUNCED LANCE TO

  • ACCEPT 100,000 UKRAINIANS INTO

  • THE UNITED STATES IF THEY WANT

  • TO COME, OF COURSE.

  • WE ARE WORKING TO FINALIZE THE

  • DETAILS OF THAT.

  • RIGHT NOW, AS WE HAVE BEEN

  • TALKING ABOUT IMPLEMENT TIED

  • IMPLEMENTING ON TITLE 42, NO

  • MATTER WHAT COUNTRY YOU'RE

  • COMING FROM, WHETHER UKRAINE,

  • OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE

  • WORLD.

  • >> IS THERE ANYTHING

  • IMMEDIATELY IN THE WORKS FOR A

  • PLANNER PROGRAMS MUCH OF THAT

  • WAX TO MAKE THE PRESIDENT

  • ANNOUNCED A FEW WEEKAGO PLANS

  • TO WELCOME 100,000 UKRAINIAN

  • PEOPLE.

  • IT'S JUST THE DETAILS ON HOW

  • WILL WORK.

  • I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, WE

  • DON'T THE FINAL DETAILS YET.

  • >> ON SUPPLY CHAINS, MILLIONS

  • OF PEOPLE IN CHINA ARE ON

  • LOCKDOWN.

  • EXPERTS ARE SOUNDING THE ALARM

  • FOR WHAT THAT COULD MEAN FOR FU

  • THAT ARE ALREADY UNDER STRAIN.

  • HOW CONCERNED IS THE

  • ADMINISTRATION ABOUT WHAT THAT

  • COULD MEAN FOR AMERICANS

  • WAITING FOR GOODS HERE IN THE

  • U.S.?

  • IS THERE ANYTHING THE U.S. CAN

  • DO TO MITIGATE:X

  • >> THIS IS VERY FLUID.

  • I THINK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT

  • THE LOCKDOWN IN SHANGHAI.

  • THIS IS A FLUID SITUATION.

  • THERE ARE SOME UNCERTAINTIES

  • AROUND THE IMPACT OF CHINA'S

  • LOCKDOWN ON OUR ECONOMY.

  • WE ARE IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH

  • KEY ACTORS IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN

  • INCLUDING THE PORT OF LO LO

  • ANGELES AND LONG BEACH.

  • WE ARE NOT SEEING ANY SLOWDOWNS

  • IN SHIPMENT COMING FROM ASIA.

  • WE WILL CONTINUE TO KEEP OUR

  • EYE ON THAT.

  • WHAT WE HAVE SEEN HAPPEN WITHIN

  • CHINA IS THE MOVING OF THE

  • MANUFACTURING OF SOME OF THE

  • GOOD LIKE SEMICONDUCTORS AND

  • CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, THAT

  • TYPICALLY COME FROM SHANGHAI TO

  • OTHER HUBS.

  • THEY'RE MOVING THEM AROUND TO

  • SEE IF THEY CAN KEEP

  • MANUFACTURING UP.

  • THEY HAVE MOVED TOWARDS.

  • THEY HAVE MOVED AROUND WHERE

  • THE GOODS ARE GOING FROM.

  • THAT MAY BE WHY WE HAVE NOT

  • SEEN A REDUCTION IN GOODS CONG

  • THE LAST DATA, IN TERMS OF THE

  • EXPERTS IS FROM MARCH.

  • IS NIGH AT THE END OF APRIL.

  • IT SHOWED A 15% INCREASE FROM

  • LAST YEAR.

  • WE WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT THE

  • APRIL DATA WHEN IT COMES OUT IN

  • MAY.

  • >> I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND

  • WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION'S

  • POSITION IS ON HOW YOU ARE

  • APPROACHING THE MASK ISSUE.

  • THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SAID

  • THEY WOULD APPEAL THE DECISION

  • OF THE CDC WANTED THEM TO.

  • THE CDC HAS SAID THAT THEY WANT

  • MASKS IN, THEY ARE IMPORTANT.

  • HAVE A POLICY IN PLACE.

  • I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THE

  • JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS NOT

  • IMMEDIATELY APPEALING IT, AND

  • SEEKING AN EMERGENCY STAY TO

  • POTENTIALLY KEEP THIS IN PLACE

  • WHILE THE CDC EVALUATES.

  • >> I DON'T PLAY A LAWYER TO

  • BECOME I WILL GET INTO LEGAL

  • STRATEGY.

  • WHAT I WILL TELL YOU, THE CDC,

  • AS YOU NOTED CALLED FOR THE

  • EXTENSION BECAUSE THEY WANTED

  • TO LOOK AT MORE DATA.

  • WE CAN ALL ASK:THAT THEY WILL

  • CONTINUE TO WANT IT.

  • THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS

  • WAITINR THAT FINAL COMMENTS

  • TO TAKE ACTION. THEY SAID THEY

  • WOULD APPEAL, AS FAR AS WHEN

  • THEY WILL APPEAL, I WILL LEAVE

  • THAT TO THEM.

  • WHY NOT A STAY OR AN EMERGENCY

  • APPEAL?

  • THEY CAN SPEAK TO THAT.

  • WHAT I WOULD NOTE, THE

  • OBJECTIVE IS TO APPEAL THE 15

  • DAY EXTENSION AND TO PRESERVE

  • THE CDC AUTHORITY OVER THE LONG-

  • TERM.

  • AS WE NOTED FROM HERE, WE DO

  • EXPECT THERE TO BE UPS AND

  • DOWNS IN THE PANDEMIC.

  • WE WANT THE CDC TO CONTINUE TO

  • HAVE THIS AUTHORITY.

  • >> IN PLAIN ENGLISH, THE CDC

  • DETERMINES AT THE END OF THE 15

  • DAY PERIOD THAT THEY ARE

  • UNDERGOING THAT THEY WOULD NOT

  • CONTINUE THE MASK MANDATE THAN

  • THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WILL NOT

  • PURSUE THE APPEAL?

  • >> I EXPECT TO HEAR FROM THE

  • CDC VERYSOON

  • I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE AT THE

  • END OF 15 DAYS AS FAR AS THEIR

  • EXPECTATIONS.

  • >> TITLE 42, YOU FLOODED THE

  • CONGRESSIONAL ACTION OUT THERE.

  • TITLE 42 IS A KEY PARTS OVER [

  • INDISCERNIBLE ]. THE QUESTION I

  • AM CURIOUS AND, IF YOUR

  • SIGNALING IF THEY WILL

  • NEGOTIATE OVER THE LIFTING OF

  • TITLE 42 AS FAR AS TRYING TO

  • GET THE COVID-19 PACKAGE IN

  • LINE.

  • IF SO, DO YOU HAVE ANY UPDATE

  • ON THE STRATEGY THERE?

  • YOU'RE BANGING THE DRUMS ABOUT

  • HOW IMPORTANT IT WAS BEFORE

  • CONGRESS WENT AWAY.

  • NOW THEY'RE COMING BACK.

  • WE ARE STILL BANGING THE DRUMS

  • ABOUT THE COVID-19 MONEY.

  • WAS MAKING CLEAR, THERE IS BEEN

  • CONCERNS ABOUT THIS, THE CDC

  • HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE

  • WHEN THE CONDITIONS EXIST TO

  • LIFT TITLE 42.

  • THAT WAS GIVEN TO THEM BY

  • CONGRESS.

  • IFONGRS WANTED TO EXTEND

  • THAT, THEY NEED TO TAKE ACTION.

  • THAT IS NOT IN EXECUTIVE

  • AUTHORITY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

  • >> THE PRESIDENT WOULD BE OPEN

  • TO LEGISLATION PROVIDED COVID-

  • 19 FUNDING, AND ALSO EXNDEDTHAT

  • >> WE ARE NOT THERE.

  • I WAS JUST CONVEYING, AS YOU

  • KNOW, THERE ARE STRONG VIEWS ON

  • A RANGE OF IMMIGRATION ISSUES

  • AND PROPOSALS IN CONGRESS.

  • I'M NOT TELLING YOU SOMETHING

  • YOU DON'T KNOW.

  • SOME PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO SE

  • THIS EXTENDED.

  • THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO DEFINITELY

  • WOULD NOT.

  • I AM NOT MAKING A PREDICTION OF

  • THE FUTURE, ONLY CONVEYING WHAT

  • AUTHORITY WOULD BE REQUIRED.

  • >> WITH THE WHITE HOUSE SUPPORT

  • THE BILL THAT THE SENATORS

  • BRINGING FORTH, WORKING TO

  • EXTEND TITLE 42 UNTIL THERE IS

  • A PLAN IN PLACE?

  • >> I DON'T HAVE ANY PREDICTION

  • OF THAT.

  • THE PRESIDENT HAS PROPOSED AND

  • PUT FORWARD, AND CALLED FOR HIM

  • IF IMMIGRATION REFORM.

  • THAT ISWH HE DID ON HIS

  • FIRST DAY IN OFFICE.

  • WE ARE HAPPY TO HAVE A RANGE OF

  • CONVERSATIONS ABOUT A RANGE OF

  • IDEAS.

  • I WANTED YOU TO KNOW WHAT

  • AUTHORITY WOULD BE REQUIRED.

  • >> [ INDISCERNIBLE ] MEDIA IS

  • SAYING THAT THE PRESIDENT WILL

  • BE GOING MAY 20 OR 21st.

  • >> I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO

  • CONFIRM BEYOND WHAT THE

  • PRESIDENT IS CONFIRMED.

  • WE WILL HAVE MORE TO SAY SOON,

  • I AM SURE.

  • >> ON COVID-19, WONDERING IF

  • THE ADMINISTRATION HAS A DROP-

  • DOWN DATE IN WHICH CONGRESS HAS

  • TO GIVE THEM THE FUNDING.

  • I KNOW YOU TALKED ABOUT THE

  • SUPPLY OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES

  • RUNNING OUT IN MAY AND TESTING

  • WILL RAMP DOWN BY JUNE.

  • IS JIM THE DEADLINE?

  • IS IT EARLIER?

  • IS IT LATER?

  • >> I WOULD SAY IT IS AS SOON AS

  • POSSIBLE.

  • WE ALREADY HAD TO TAKE STEPS.

  • WITH AND THE PROGRAM FOR THE

  • UNINSURED.

  • WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO MAKE

  • PURCHASES THAT WE WOULD

  • NORMALLY PURCHASE TO GET AHEAD.

  • EVEN ON THE MONOCLONAL

  • ANTIBODIES, AND THE TREATMENTS,

  • SOME OF THEM TAKE MONTHS TO

  • MAKE.

  • IT PUTS US BEHIND WHERE WE NEED

  • TO BE AND WANT TO BE IN

  • PLANNING.

  • WE DON'T HAVE A LONG-TERM

  • DEADLINE.

  • WE WANT TO DO THIS AS QUICKLY

  • AS POSSIBLE, WHEN THEY RETURN.

  • >> SEVERAL SENATORS, DEMOCRATS

  • AND REPUBLICANS HAVE CALLED ON

  • THE PRESIDENT TO APPLY A

  • ORDITOR OR A CZAR OVER THE

  • TRANSFER OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT

  • FROM THE U.S. TO UKRAINE.

  • WHAT DOES THE MINISTRATION

  • THINK OF THIS IDEA?>> I DON'T

  • HAVE ANY PERSONAL UPDATES.

  • OBVIOUSLY, ENSURING, THIS GOES

  • BACK TO AN EARLIER QUESTION,

  • THAT THIS IS DONE EFFECTIVELY

  • AND QUICKLY.

  • THAT IS THE PRIORITY FOR THE

  • PRESIDENT.

  • I DON'T HAVE ANY PERSONNEL

  • PREVIEWS OR UPDATES AT THIS

  • POINT IN TIME.; TO ASK ABOUT

  • THE CONCEPT OF ATHLETIC

  • BOYCOTTS.

  • IS THIS SOMETHING THE

  • ADMINISTRATION SUPPORTS?

  • THEY DECIDED TO BAN ATHLETES

  • FROM RUSSIA AND BELARUS.

  • DOES THE ADMINISTRATION BELIEVE

  • THIS IS A GOOD TACTIC?

  • >> WE HAVESEEN 600 COMPANIES,

  • PRIVATE SECTOR COMPANIES

  • PULLING OUT, VOLUNTARILY.

  • I BELIEVE THEIR INVESTMENTS ARE

  • IN RUSSIA.

  • I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A POLICY

  • ON ATHLETIC EVENTS AT THIS

  • POINT IN TIME.

  • I AM HAPPY TO CHECK.

  • >> THERE WEREREPORTS THAT U.S.

  • OFFICIALS WALKED OUT OF THE G

  • 20 WHEN RUSSIAN OFFICIALS

  • STARTED ACHING.

  • IS THIS SOMETHING WE COULD

  • ANTICIPATE THE PRESIDENT MAKING

  • AS WELL?>> THE SECRETARY AND

  • THE PRESIDENT SAYS WE CANNOT

  • HAVE BUSINESS AS USUAL AT THE

  • G20, OR MANY OF THESE

  • INTERNATIONAL FORUMS AS RELATES

  • TO RUSSIA.

  • THE TREASURY TEAM MADE CLEAR

  • THAT SHE WAS PLANNING TO

  • PARTICIPATE IN SOME, AND NOT

  • OTHER MEETINGS.

  • THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT BELIEVE

  • THEY SHOULD BE PART OF THE G20.

  • IT IS NOW SIX MONTHS AWAY, AS

  • FAR AS HIS PARTICIPATION.

  • I CANNOT MAKE A PREDICTION OF

  • WHAT ACTIONS HE MAY OR MAY NOT

  • TAKE.

  • WE DO SUPPORT HER STEPS.

  • IT IS AN INCATI OFTHE FACT

  • THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA

  • HAS BECOME A PARIAH ON THE

  • GLOBAL STAGE.

  • >> JUST TODAY, THERE WERE

  • CONSEQUENCES OF [ INDISCERNIBLE

  • ] JOINING NATO.

  • DO YOU HAVE A RESPONSE?

  • TO MAKE THE DECISION OF ANY

  • COUNTRY TO JOIN NATO IS UP TO

  • THAT COUNTRY, AND NATO TO MAKE

  • A DETERMINATION.

  • THAT IS THE CASE HERE.

  • WE DO STRONGLY SUPPORT NATO'S

  • OPEN-DOOR POLICY.

  • I WILL NOT INDULGE RUSSIA'S

  • SABER RATTLING>> JUST TO ZOOM O

  • AND THE POLICY ON THE WAR, THE

  • PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN

  • COUNCIL SAID, YOU ARE NOT

  • ALONE, WE ARE WITH YOU.

  • WE WILL DO EVERYTHING THAT IS

  • POSSIBLE TO SEE WHAT YOU TO

  • MAKE SURE UKRAINE WILL WIN THE

  • WAR.

  • IS IT THE POLICY OF THE UNITED

  • STATES THAT RUSSIA SHOULD NOT

  • ONLY LOSE BUT SEEM TO LOSE THE

  • WAR? IS THAT A RATEC GOAL?

  • >> WE ARE CLEAR THAT WE WILL DO

  • EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO ENSURE

  • THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA

  • RECOGNIZE THAT THIS IS A

  • STRATEGIC LOSS.

  • THE PRESIDENT IS A PARIAH ON

  • THE GLOBAL STAGE.

  • NOW, WHEN YOU HAVE A COUNTRY

  • THAT HAS LOST AS MANY PEOPLE AS

  • UKRAINE, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE

  • HAVE LEFT HOME.

  • I DON'T KNOW IF THAT FEELS LIKE

  • A WIN TO THEM.

  • I THINK IT IS ALSO TRUE THAT

  • THE UKRAINIANS HAVE CLEARLY WON

  • THE BATTLE OF KYIV AND

  • SURPASSED THE EXPECTATIONS OF

  • THE WORLD, AS FAR AS THEIR

  • ABILITY TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST

  • RUSSIA.

  • RUSSIA HAS NOT ONLY COME

  • PARIAH ON THE WORLD STAGE, BUT

  • THEY HAVE UNITED NATO, THEY

  • HAVE DRIVEN COUNTRIES TO DESIRE

  • AN INTEREST IN JOINING NATO.

  • THE UNITED THE WEST IN A WAY

  • THAT HAS NEVER BEEN THEIR

  • OBJECTIVE AND THEIR ECONOMY IS

  • CRUMBLING.

  • THAT IS ALL CTORIN TERMS OF

  • ISOLATING RUSSIA.

  • >> IS THE CONCRETE GOAL OF THE

  • AID, THE ARTILLERY, AND MORE,

  • IS THE GOAL A BATTLEFIELD

  • DEFEAT FOR RUSSIA?

  • NOT A COMPROMISE, NO GRAY

  • AREAS?

  • >> WE ARE DOING EVERYTHING WE

  • CAN EQUIP THE UKRAINIAN

  • GOVERNMENT AND UKRAINIAN

  • LEADERS TO EFFECTIVELY FIGHT

  • BACK IN THIS MILITARY BATTLE.

  • >> JUST TO GO BACK TO THE MASK

  • RULING, HE DID MENTION SOME OF

  • THE VIDEOS WE SAW.

  • IT DID PROMPT SOME ABRUPT

  • CHANGES ON MONDAYTER HE

  • CAME DOWN.

  • PASSENGERS WERE TOLD MIDFLIGHT

  • TO TAKE THE MASK OFF HERE CAN

  • YOU SHARE MORE ABOUT WHAT THE

  • PRESIDENTS PERSONAL REACTION

  • WAS TO THE DECISION TO HOW IT

  • CAME DOWN AND WHAT UNFOLDED

  • OVER A COUPLE OF HOURS?

  • >> I'M NOT SURE WE HAVE A STORY

  • HERE ABOUT THE FLIGHTS.

  • >> WITH APPEARANCE BEING ON THE

  • FLIGHT WITH YOUR KIDS IN THE

  • BEING CONCERNED BECAUSE THEY

  • WERE MIDFLIGHT.

  • WHAT WAS HIS REACTION TO THE

  • DECISION?

  • WHAT HAPPENED OVER THE NEXT

  • COUPLE OF HOURS?

  • >> WE DID NOT EXPECT THE

  • DECISION.

  • WE WOULD NOT HAVE KNOWN IN

  • ADVANCE HOW A COURT WOULD ACT.

  • WE DISAGREED WITH THE DECISION

  • IMMEDIATELY.

  • THE IMMEDIATE STEPS WERE TO

  • DETERMINE WHAT POWER WE HAD TO

  • RESPOND TO THAT.

  • OBVIOUSLY, THAT CAME IN THE

  • FORM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF

  • JUSTICE.

  • THEY CAME IN THE FORM OF THE

  • CDC ACTING AND PUTTING OUT THE

  • STATEMENTS THAT THEY DID.

  • WE ALSO DON'T TAKE PHOTOS OF

  • FLIGHTS AS DATA ABOUT HOW THE

  • COUNTRY REACTS TO ISSUES ON

  • WHETHER THEY ARE RIPPING OFF

  • THEIMASKOR NOT.

  • THE FOCUS HERE WAS SEEING WHAT

  • POWER WE HAD TO PRESERVE WHAT

  • WE FELT WAS IN THE PUBLIC

  • HEALTH INTEREST OF THE COUNTRY.

  • >> THE COVID-19 ADVISORS ARE

  • CONCERNED THERE COULD BE AN

  • INCREASE OF CASES IN THE COMING

  • WEEKS, SPECIFICALLY DUE TO THE

  • MASK MANDATE BEING LIFTED?

  • STOMACH I WILL MAKE A

  • PROJECTION OF THAT, BECAUSE I

  • AM NOT A DOCTOR.

  • I CAN CHECK WITH THE HEALTH

  • TEAM AND SEE IF THEY HAVE ANY

  • PREDICTIONS OF THAT.

  • THEY OBVIOUSLY WANTED MORE

  • TIME.

  • THEY HAVE SEEN THE RISING

  • CASES.

  • THEY FEEL IT IS IN OUR INTEREST

  • EVEN FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF

  • TIME, OR HAVE THE AUTHORITY

  • MOVING FORWARD IN CASE THE

  • CASES GO UP AND WE NEED TO TAKE

  • THAT STEP IN THE FUTURE.

  • I DON'T HAVE A PREDICTION OF

  • RISING CASES.

  • I WOULD POINT YOU TO THE CDC OR

  • OTHER HEALTH OFFICIALS.

  • >> THERE ARE REPORTS IN MEXICO

  • STATING THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT

  • DECIDED TO DISMANTLE THE

  • NATIONAL POLICE GROUP THAT WAS

  • FIGHTING THE MEXICAN CARTELS

  • DOWN THERE.

  • I WONDER IF THE ADMINISTRATION

  • IS AWARE OF THAT, OR IF YOU

  • HAVE ANY REACTION TO THAT ASKED

  • >> I AM HAPPY TO BE IF OUR TEAM

  • HAS A SPECIFIC REACTION.

  • >> FOR SWELL, IN ISRAEL, DO WE

  • HAVE A REACTION TO THE DEADLY

  • CLASHES IN ISRAEL OF THE

  • PALESTINIANS?

  • DOES THAT CHANGE THE SENSE OF

  • THE ABRAHAM ACCORDS ON HOW TO

  • ACHIEVE PEACE IN THE REGION?

  • >> WE ARE DEEPLY CONCERNED BY

  • THE RECENT VIOLENCE IN

  • JERUSALEM.

  • THOSE OF THE TEMPLE MOUNT AND

  • ACROSS THE WEST BANK.

  • WE ARE STRONGLY CONDEMNING THE

  • RECENT ROCKET ATTACK ON ISRAEL.

  • WE ARE CALLING ON ALL SIDES TO

  • EXERCISE RESTRAINT AND PRESERVE

  • THE HISTORIC STATUS QUO OF THE

  • SHARIF TEMPLE MOUNT.

  • WE CONTINUE TO URGE PALESTINIAN

  • AND ISRAELI OFFICIALS TO

  • LOWERED TENSIONS TO ENSURE THE

  • SAFETY OF EVERYONE.

  • WE CONTINUE TO CLOSELY FOLLOW

  • THE SITUATION ON THE GROUND AND

  • STAY IN TOUCH THROUGH

  • DIPLOMATIC CHANNELS.

  • >> DOESN'T CHANGE THE STANCE ON

  • THE ABRAHAM CORD>> KNOW

  • THERE IS NO CHANGE.

  • >> OFFICIALS ARE MEETING WITH

  • CUBA TO POSSIBLY INCLUDE THEM

  • ON IN THE IMMIGRATION POLICY.

  • WHAT MIGHT THAT LOOK LIKE IN

  • THE FUTURE?

  • IS IT A POSSIBILITY?

  • WE SEE THESE TALKS AS PRETTY

  • STANDARD.

  • THE MIGRATION TALKS PROVIDE

  • DISCUSONS GRATION ISSUES

  • BETWEEN CUBA AND THE UNITED

  • DATES.

  • THEY ARE PART OF REGULAR

  • MEETINGS THAT GO OVER 30 YEARS

  • OF ENGAGEMENT WITH CUBA ON

  • MIGRATION MATTERS.

  • WE MAINTAIN THESE IN ORDER TO

  • SCUSSAFE, ORDERLY AND LEGAL

  • MIGRATION, REMAINING A PRIMARY

  • U.S. INTEREST.

  • BEYOND WHAT LOOKS LIKE, THIS IS

  • JUST A STANDARD OPERATING

  • PROCESS THAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING

  • OVER THE COURSE OF MANY YEARS.

  • THE LAST ONES WERE IN 2018.

  • >> HOW DOES THE ADMINISTRATION

  • JUSTIFY SENDING CLAIBORNE,

  • WHERE CRITICS SAY ARE QUITE

  • DANGEROUS.

  • THEY HAVE BEEN BANNED BY 160

  • COUNTRIES, INCLUDING UKRAINE.

  • >> I POINT YOU TO THE

  • DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO SPEAK

  • TO ANY SPECIFICS OF THE

  • MILITARY EQUIPMENT OR THE

  • ASSISTANCE WE ARE PROVIDING.

  • WE ARE PROVIDING THIS TO A

  • COUNTRY FACING AN INVASION BY

  • RUSSIA, TARGETING THEIR

  • CIVILIANS AND THEIR PEOPLE.

  • THIS IS MEANT TO EFFECTIVELY

  • HELP THEM FIGHT THAT WAR.

  • THANK YOU EVERYONE.

>>> HELLO EVERYONE.

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it