Subtitles section Play video
>> I'M MAX DONATH, AND WELCOME TO OUR SEMINAR SERIES ON
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES.
AS WE'VE DONE THESE PAST FEW WEEKS, I'M GOING TO WELCOME
HANNAH GRUNE FIRST TO COME UP AND JUST TAKE CARE OF SOME
HOUSEKEEPING AND THEN I'LL TAKE OVER AND INTRODUCE OUR
SPEAKER. >> THANK YOU.
WELCOME, EVERYONE, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE WATCHING VIA
THE WEB, WE ASK THAT YOU PLEASE SIGN IN WITH THE NUMBER
OF PEOPLE WATCHING AT YOUR LOCATION IN THE CHAT BOX AT
THE UPPER RIGHT-HAND SIDE. AND WE ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT
OUR VIEWERSHIP RATES TO THE U.S. D.O.T. AND WOULD
APPRECIATE HAVING THE MOST ACCURATE COUNT POSSIBLE.
FOR STUDENTS IN THE ROOM, IF YOU ARE WAITING ON A WRITEUP
BACK FROM ME, PLEASE SEE ME AFTER THE SEMINAR IS OVER.
FOR THE LIVE AUDIENCE, PLEASE HOLD ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS
UNTIL THE END. WE'LL BE PASSING AROUND THIS
MICROPHONE SO THAT THE WEB AUDIENCE CAN HEAR WHAT'S BEING
SAID. SO PLEASE MAKE SURE TO HOLD IT
CLOSE TO YOUR FACE. THANK YOU.
>> I'M HONORED TO INTRODUCE
SPEAKER TODAY. IT TOOK ME A WHILE TO CONVINCE
HIM TO GIVE THIS SEMINAR. DEMOZ GEBRE-EGZIABHER.
HE'S BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS AREA OF WORKING WITH DRONES
AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
AND I REMEMBER HE WORKED WITH THE MINNESOTA STATE PATROL
HELICOPTER FOLKS, LOOKING AT THE RISK OF DRONES MIXING IT
UP WITH STATE PATROL HELICOPTERS, AND WHAT ARE SOME
OF THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT, AND THAT WAS IN 2006,
2005, IN THAT TIME FRAME, SO ABOUT TEN YEARS AGO BEFORE ALL
THE BUZZ ON DRONES THAT WE HEAR ABOUT IN THE NEWSPAPER
THESE DAYS. PROFESSOR DEMOZ
GEBRE-EGZIABHER HAS BEEN ALL OVER THE PLACE.
HE DID -- HE RECEIVED HIS Ph PhD AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
HE WAS A COMMISSIONED NAVAL OFFICER FOR SIX, SEVEN YEARS.
LEFT THE SERVICE AS A LIEUTENANT IN THE NAVY.
HE WORKED WITH THE NAVAL C.E. SYSTEMS COMMAND IN WASHINGTON,
D.C., FOR QUITE A NUMBER OF YEARS.
AND IS AN INSTRUMENTED-RATED PILOT.
AND I'M SURE THERE WILL BE A LOT OF QUESTIONS AFTER THIS
TALK. SO WITHOUT FURTHER ADO, LET'S
WELCOME PROFESSOR GEBRE EGZIABHER.
[ Applause ]
IS THE MICROPHONE ON? ALL RIGHT.
SO THANK YOU, MAX, FOR THAT WELCOME, THE INVITE, AND THANK
YOU, EVERYONE, FOR BEING HERE THIS AFTERNOON.
I'M GOING TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW ABOUT UNMANNED AIRCRAFT
SYSTEMS, U.A.S., SOMETIMES CALLED.
TALK ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR USING THESE IN TRAFFIC AND
INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEILLANCE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES.
AND I'M GOING TO SPEND MORE TIME ON THE CHALLENGE SIDE.
BECAUSE WE'LL SEE THERE'S ALL KINDS OF THINGS WE CAN DO WITH
THESE VEHICLES, THERE'S ALL KINDS OF THINGS THAT PEOPLE
HAVE AND THEIR VISION OF DOING WITH THEM.
BUT ALL OF THESE COME WITH SOME CHALLENGES THAT WE NEED
TO ADDRESS BEFORE WE CAN ACTUALLY USE THESE ON A
DAY-TO-DAY APPLICATION. I'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT
THE OPPORTUNITIES, ALSO TALK ABOUT THE CHALLENGES, SOME OF
THE THINGS WE'RE DOING HERE AT THE U OF M TO ADDRESS SOME OF
THESE CHALLENGES. SO, WITHOUT -- BEFORE WE GET
INTO THE TOP -- THE MEAT OF THE TOPIC, LET'S KIND OF
DEFINE SOME BACKGROUNDS BACKGROUND TERMS
AND IDEAS, BASICALLY. SO, FIRST OF ALL, UNMANNED
AERIAL VEHICLES, THEY'RE BASICALLY AIRCRAFT THAT ARE
OPERATED AUTONOMOUSLY, ALL RIGHT, COULD BE COMPLETELY
AUTONOMOUSLY OR THERE COULD BE SOMEONE ON THE GROUND REMOTELY
OPERATING THEM, CALLED DRONES, THAT TERM BOTHERS ME, I GUESS
I'M LOSING, AND THAT'S BECOMING THE STANDARD TERM SO
WE'LL CALL THEM DRONES OR THEY COULD BE CALLED R.P.V.s OR
R.O.V.s, ANOTHER TERM THAT'S USED FOR THEM.
THERE'S ALL KINDS OF ENVISION ENVISIONED APPLICATIONS FOR
THESE VEHICLES. THEY'RE BEING ENVISIONED FOR
WHAT ARE CALLED THE 3Ds OR THE DANGEROUS, THE DIRTY AND
THE DULL MISSIONS. AND IF YOU WANT TO LIST SOME
OF THE DANGEROUS ONES, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT'S SOME OF THE
THINGS WE DO AT THE U.A.V. LAB LAB, FLIGHT TESTING, THEY'RE A
NICE SURROGATE FOR BIG AIRPLANES, WHERE IN THE PAST
YOU'D HAVE TO PUT A TEST PILOT IN, NOW YOU CAN PUT A UNMANNED
AIRCRAFT IN AND DO THE RISKY WITH IT.
THE DIRTY, TALK ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, THEY'RE BEING USED, FOR
EXAMPLE, TO MONITOR SMOKESTACKS OF FACTORIES AND
SORT OF THINGS LIKE THAT. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, WE'RE
USING FOR CHEMICAL SPRAYING, PERHAPS.
AND THEN YOU GOT THE DULL SIDE OF IT, WHICH IS, WELL, DULL
NOT IN THE SENSE THAT IT'S BORING, BUT IT'S CONTINUOUSLY
LOOKING AT INFRASTRUCTURE, INSPECTING SOMETHING MIGHT BE
DULL, SO THEY COULD TAKE THAT KIND OF DULLNESS AWAY FROM
HUMAN OPERATOR. SO THOSE ARE THE KINDS OF
APPLICATIONS THEY'RE BEING LOOKED AT FOR.
WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IN THIS TALK, I'M GOING TO LOOK AT
JUST TWO CASE STUDIES, TWO CASES OF WHERE WE COULD USE
THEM IN TRAFFIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEILLANCE,
AND THEN TALK ABOUT THE LIMITATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
THEM. AND I'M GOING TO FOCUS ON WHAT
ARE CALLED SMALL OR CLASS 1 AND 2U.A.V.s, THEY COME IN
ALL KINDS OF SIZE AND RANGES. THE GLOBAL HAWK SHOWN HERE IS
ABOUT A 30,000 U.A.V., HAS A WING SPAN ABOUT 130 FEET,
ABOUT THE SIZE OF A 737, IF YOU WANT TO THINK ABOUT IT
THIS WAY. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ISSUES,
DIFFERENT PROBLEMS, WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON THESE THAT
ARE THE MOST RELEVANT THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING
ABOUT TODAY. SMALL U.A.V.s.
THE CLASSIFICATION, I SAID THERE'S A LARGE SPAN OF
CAPABILITIES, SIZES, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON ARE
JUST WHAT ARE CALLED THE GROUP 2 AND 3 U.A.V.s, AND
BASICALLY ONE WAY TO THINK ABOUT THEM, THEY WEIGH LESS
THAN 55 POUNDS, AND THEY FLY SLOWER THAN 200 KNOTS,
ACTUALLY, A BETTER NUMBER IS 1 100 MILES PER HOUR, SO
SOMETHING IN THAT AREA. AND THEY DON'T FLY VERY HIGH,
EVEN THOUGH THE CLASSIFICATION OF THESE UP TO 3,500 FEET,
USUALLY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT APPLICATIONS LESS THAN 500
FEET ABOVE THE GROUND. SO WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON
THOSE. AGAIN, IT'S A BIG AREA, SO
WE'RE JUST GOING TO
NARROW DOWN, LOOK AT ONE PARTICULAR
ASPECT OF IT. ALL RIGHT.
SO ONE MORE PIECE OF TERMINOLOGY.
IS THE TERM U.A.V. AND U.A.S. GETS THROWN BACK AND FORTH
INTERCHANGEABLY, AND I WILL DO THAT, TOO.
TO BE CORRECT, THOUGH, WE SHOULD DISTINGUISH BETWEEN
THOSE TWO. THE U.A.V., THE UNMANNED
AERIAL VEHICLE, IS THE AIRCRAFT THAT'S IN THE AIR
THAT'S DOING THE MISSION THAT HAS A PAYLOAD ON IT.
HOWEVER, ASSOCIATED WITH THAT, THERE HAS TO BE A GROUND
STATION. THERE HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON THE
GROUND CONTROLLING IT, COMMANDING IT, TELLING IT TO
DO WHAT IT NEEDS TO DO, AND THAT'S AN INTEGRAL PART OF
THIS. SO THE GROUND STATION, PLUS
THE RADIO DATA LINKS THAT ARE USED TO SEND INFORMATION UP,
PLUS THE AERIAL VEHICLE TOGETHER FORM WHAT'S CALLED A
U.A.S., UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM SYSTEM.
SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT U.A.V.s U.A.V.s, WE SHOULD REALLY BE
TALKING ABOUT THE ENTIRE SYSTEM, SO THE AIRCRAFT, THE
DEALINGS AND THE GROUND OPERATOR.
AND YOU WILL SEE MAYBE IN ABOUT 10, 15 MINUTES WHEN I
START TALKING ABOUT HOW YOU OPERATE THESE AIRCRAFT LEGALLY
LEGALLY, THIS PART OF THE PICTURE BECOMES IMPORTANT, THE
GROUND, THE OPERATOR IS ACTUALLY AN INTEGRAL PART OF
ALL OF THIS. ALL RIGHT.
SO, THE ROAD MAP, I JUST DID SOME BACKGROUND, WHAT I WANT
TO DO NEXT IS TALK ABOUT A LITTLE BIT ABOUT OPPORTUNITIES
OPPORTUNITIES, WHO'S USING U. U.A.S. AND WHAT APPLICATIONS.
AND WHAT I'M GOING TO DO -- USE THAT FOR IS TO SET THE
GROUNDWORK FOR THE CHALLENGES. AND, AGAIN, IF THERE'S ANYONE
HERE INTERESTED IN U.A.V.s, OR IN THE AUDIENCE, YOU
PROBABLY ARE INTERESTED IN KNOWING WHAT ARE THE ISSUES,
WHAT DO I NEED TO BE AWARE OF BEFORE I USE THEM.
THERE ARE SOME REGULATORY ISSUES, WE'LL TALK ABOUT THOSE
THOSE. AND WE'LL ANCHOR THAT WITH
TECHNICAL CHALLENGES THAT ARE OUT THERE, THAT ARE STILL
BEING WORKED ON THAT ARE NOT ADDRESSED AND I'LL GIVE A
SUMMARY AND OPEN IT UP FOR SOME QUESTIONS.
THAT'S THE ROAD MAP, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO.
ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S TALK ABOUT
OPPORTUNITIES. AND BEFORE I DO THAT, LET ME
SHOW YOU THIS TABLE. SO, FIRST OF ALL, TO BE ABLE
TO OPERATE U.A.V.s LEGALLY IN THE U.S. TODAY, YOU HAVE TO
HAVE PERMISSION FROM THE F.A. F.A.A.
AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT THE DETAILS OF HOW TO DO THAT.
DON'T DO IT WITHOUT A PERMISSION.
IT'S GOING TO BE COSTLY. STARTING TO BECOME COSTLY
THESE DAYS BECAUSE THEY'RE BEGINNING TO ENFORCE THE RULES
RULES. ANYWAY, SO, THIS TABLE WAS
GENERATED FROM THE LIST OF FOLKS THAT APPLIED FOR PERMITS
TO OPERATE U.A.V.s LAST YEAR YEAR.
AND, SO, BASED ON THAT, WHAT WE SEE IS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY,
OR AERIAL SURVEYING SEEMS TO BE THE PLACE WHERE THERE'S A
LOT OF APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION GOING ON.
HOWEVER, THIS IS KIND OF MIS MISLEADING BECAUSE THERE ARE
SOME OTHER APPLICATIONS, LIKE PRECISION AGRICULTURE,
INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION, WHICH ARE DEFINITELY GOING TO
BE MORE AND MORE PREVALENT AS TIME GOES ON, BUT, AGAIN,
THERE'S A LOT OF TECHNICAL PROBLEMS THAT HAVE TO BE
SOLVED BEFORE THOSE BECOME TURNKEY SOLUTIONS THAT PEOPLE
CAN USE. SO WE'LL TALK ABOUT SOME OF
THAT LATER ON. NOW, IF YOU LOOK AT TRAFFIC
AND INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEILLANCE USE CASES THAT
ARE OUT THERE, THEY'RE BEING USED, FOR EXAMPLE, FOR
ACCIDENT SCENE RECONSTRUCTION, WHERE THERE'S AN ACCIDENT, YOU
WANT TO TAKE PICTURES AND GET A NICE MAP OF EXACTLY WHAT
WENT ON FOR MAYBE LAWSUITS LATER ON, SO SOME HIGHWAY
PATROLS HAVE BEEN USING THEM FOR THAT.
EMERGENCY SCENE MANAGEMENT, FIRES, THINGS LIKE THAT,
THERE'S SOME USE ON THAT. POWER LINE INSPECTIONS,
THEY'VE BEEN USED FOR THAT. FLARE STACK INSPECTIONS AND
THE BLUE HERE IS A LINK, I GUESS WE'LL MAKE THE
PRESENTATION AVAILABLE AFTER THIS, SO IF YOU WANT, YOU CAN
GO AHEAD AND CLICK ON THAT, IT SENDS YOU TO A VERY NICE WEB
PAGE PUT TOGETHER BY A CONSORTIUM OF SMALL U.A.V.
FOLKS THAT WANT TO USE SMALL U.A.V.s AND THERE ARE A LOT
OF NICE VIDEOS OF SMALL U.A.S. U.A.S.s BEING USED FOR
INSPECTION PURPOSES, DAM INSPECTIONS, BRIDGE INSPECTION
INSPECTIONS, RAILWAY INSPECTIONS.
AND I'LL TALK ABOUT THESE TWO NEXT.
EVEN THOUGH YOU DON'T CONSIDER THIS INFRASTRUCTURE, ANOTHER
PLACE WHERE THERE'S A BIG CALL FOR U.A.S. IS IN AGRICULTURE.
BUT, AGAIN, THAT'S A DIFFERENT TOPIC, SOMETHING WE'RE WORKING
ON QUITE A BIT HERE. BUT I WON'T TALK ABOUT THAT
TODAY. UNLESS FOLKS WANT TO ASK
QUESTIONS LATER ON, I COULD TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IT.
SO, TWO CASES THAT YOU COULD LOOK AT WHERE U.A.V.s,
DRONES, U.A.S.s ARE BEING USED, ONE, INFRASTRUCTURE
INSPECTION WHERE THIS PHOTOGRAPH AND THE DETAILS
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS, I JUST TOOK FROM CROSSROADS, WHICH IS
A BLOG OR A NEWSLETTER, IF YOU WILL, BY MnDOT, AND THERE'S
AN ARTICLE THERE, AND I ACTUALLY SUGGEST IF YOU'RE
INTERESTED, GO AHEAD AND TAKE A LOOK AT IT.
IT'S A REALLY NICE WRITEUP ABOUT THE PLANS TO USE U.A.S.
FOR INSPECTING BRIDGES. IN THIS CASE YOU SEE A SMALL
QUAD COPTER TRYING TO DO INSPECTIONS OF A TRAIN TRESTLE
OR BRIDGE, AND ONE APPLICATION IS EXACTLY THIS, THE U.A.V.
BECOMES A PLATFORM FOR CARRYING A PAYLOAD, IT COULD
BE A CAMERA OF SOME SORT, AND THAT CAMERA COULD BE USED TO
INSPECT CLOSELY WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THAT STRUCTURE.
NOW, AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S A METAL STRUCTURE, YOU HAVE THE
U.A.V. VERY CLOSE TO IT. AS I'LL TALK ABOUT IN A LITTLE
BIT, ONE OF THE KEY SENSORS ON MOST OF THE U.A.S. IS G.P.S.,
THIS IS ACTUALLY A VERY BAD ENVIRONMENT FOR HAVING G.P.S.
IT'S A MULTIPATH HEAVEN, REFLECTION OF SIGNALS ARE
GOING TO BE COMING OFF THE STRUCTURE, SO THAT COULD
AFFECT SOME OF THE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE.
BUT THOSE ARE THE KINDS OF THINGS, SOME OF THE CHALLENGES
THAT HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED OR LOOKED AT WHEN LOOKING AT
USING U.A.S. FOR THESE KINDS OF APPLICATIONS.
THIS IS ONE. I GUESS THERE'S A COMPELLING
ECONOMIC CASE TO BE MADE FOR IT.
I WALK TO WORK EVERY DAY. I 0 WALK OVER THE FRANKLIN
STREET BRIDGE THESE DAYS, THEY'RE DOING SOME INSPECTION
REPAIR OF IT, THE AMOUNT OF INFRASTRUCTURE SET UP THERE
FOR DOING THAT TYPE OF WORK IS QUITE EXTENSEIVE AND THIS MIGHT
SIMPLIFY THAT. THE NEXT ONE, WHICH I'LL TALK
A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT, AND IT'S REALLY INTERESTING ONE,
BECAUSE THERE'S A REALLY INTERESTING PROJECT WITH THE
F.A.A. GOING ON RELATED TO THIS ONE, IS RAILWAY
INSPECTION. SO, JUST TO PUT THINGS IN
CONTEXT, IN 2014, THERE WERE ABOUT 500 DERAILMENTS IN THE
U.S. THE NUMBERS ARE ABOUT 35
INJURIES RESULTING FROM THAT, AND $94 MILLION IN DAMAGE.
THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO LOOK AT THAT NUMBER.
SAY, THAT'S KIND OF A SMALL NUMBER.
ONLY 35 PEOPLE INJURED, ONLY $ $94 MILLION WASTEED.
OTHER WAY TO LOOK AT IT IS, THE NUMBERS ARE THAT SMALL
BECAUSE THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF INSPECTION AND QUITE A BIT OF
EFFORT THAT GOES ON IN THE BACKGROUND TO MAKE THE
RAILROAD SAFE. SO JUST TO USE ONE PARTICULAR
RAIL LINE AS AN EXAMPLE, I'M USING THIS FOR A VERY GOOD
REASON, BECAUSE YOU'LL HEAR ABOUT IT A LITTLE BIT LATER,
IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT BURLINGTON NORTH AND SANTA FE
THEY HAVE ABOUT 32,500 MILES WORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK IN THE
COUNTRY, AND EVERY FOOT OF THOSE RAILWAYS HAVE TO BE
INSPECTED AT LEAST TWICE A WEEK.
SO, THEY'RE VERY VERY INTERESTED IN TRYING TO
AUTOMATE THIS PROCESS. AND THIS MAY A PROGRAM WAS
LAUNCHED CALLED PATHFINDER INITIATIVE, WHICH IS A JOINT
COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE F.A. F.A.A. AND BN SPHVMENTD
LOOKING AT HOW -- BNSF LOOKING AT HOW TO USE OVER THE HORIZON
HORIZON, PARTICULARLY THEIR INTEREST IS TO BE ABLE TO
INSPECT RAILROADS LIKE THIS PARTICULAR SECTION, WHICH IS
OUT IN SOMEWHERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, I
BELIEVE, WHERE THIS PICTURE WAS TAKEN.
WHERE IT'S VERY REMOTE, WHERE IT'S VERY HARD TO GET PEOPLE
OUT THERE, IS THERE A WAY TO MAKE TEAMS OF HUMAN OPERATORS
AND U.A.S. DO THE INSPECTION AND AUTOMATE IT AND BE ABLE TO
REDUCE THE COST. SO, ANOTHER REALLY COMPELLING
CASE IN TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
WHERE U.A.S. USE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL.
SO, THE REASON I BROUGHT THIS ONE UP AS AN EXAMPLE IS
BECAUSE THIS PATH FINDER INITIATIVE IS A GOOD EXAMPLE
OF WHAT REMAINS TO BE DONE. AGAIN, THERE'S -- I MEAN,
EVERYONE -- I SHOULDN'T SAY EVERYONE, MOST EVERYONE IS
CONVINCED THAT THERE'S FREIGHT ECONOMIC BENEFIT TO USING THEM
THEM -- GREAT ECONOMIC BENEFIT IN USING THEM, IN
INFRASTRUCTURE, SURVEILLANCE MANAGEMENT, HOWEVER, THERE ARE
TECHNICAL ISSUES THAT HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED.
SO WHAT I WANT TO DO IN THE NEXT REMAINING OF THE TALK IS
TALK ABOUT THE REGULATORY AND THE TECHNICAL ISSUES THAT ONE
HAS TO BE AWARE OF BEFORE USING THESE KIND OF
APPLICATIONS. AGAIN, ANYONE -- I SHOULDN'T
SAY ANYONE -- THERE ARE MANY MANY -- THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT
ARE INTERESTED IN USING THEM FOR DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND
AND, AGAIN, YOU CAN'T LIST ALL THOSE APPLICATIONS.
THAT TABLE I SHOWED YOU AT THE BEGINNING SHOWS YOU THAT
THERE'S A GREAT INTEREST. THE QUESTION THEN IS, I HAVE A
PARTICULAR INTEREST I WANT TO APPLY THEM FOR, WHAT ARE THE
THINGS THAT I NEED TO BE AWARE OF AND WHAT ARE THE
LIMITATIONS. SO, I'LL SPEND THE REST OF THE
TALK TALKING MORE ABOUT THOSE ISSUES.
SO, THE CHALLENGES. WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES FOR
THE PARTICULAR
APPLICATIONS WHERE U.A.S. CAN BE USED.
SO LET'S TALK ABOUT THE REGULATORY PART OF IT.
SO TO APPRECIATE WHAT THE ISSUES ARE, I'M GOING TO GO
BACK AND SET UP THE STAGE AS TO WHY THERE ARE RULES
THROUGHOUT FOR OPERATING U.A. U.A.S. EXAMINE WHAT THE
CONCERN IS. SO IF THERE ARE PILOTS AROUND
HERE, FOLKS THAT FLY AIRPLANES AIRPLANES, YOU'RE VERY
FAMILIAR WITH THIS DIAGRAM. IF YOU'RE NOT, LET ME SET IT
UP AND TELL YOU WHAT IT IS. SO, IF YOU LOOK AT THE AIR
AIRSPACE AROUND THE UNITED STATES OR MOST ANYWHERE IN THE
WORLD, IT'S ACTUALLY PARCELED UP INTO DIFFERENT SECTIONS
WITH RESPECT TO AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS.
SO IN THE UNITED STATES, WE HAVE AIRSPACE THAT ARE
CLASSIFIED AS CLASS A, CLASS B B, CLASS C, CLASS D, ALL THE
WAY TO CLASS G. AND TO OPERATE IN THE
DIFFERENT REGIMES, YOU HAVE TO HAVE DIFFERENT EQUIPMENT,
DIFFERENT PROCEDURES, AND DIFFERENT RULES OF THE ROAD,
IF YOU WILL. ALL RIGHT.
SO, CLASS A IS BASICALLY THE PLACE ABOVE 18,000 FEET ARE
MOSTLY COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT AIRPLANE FLY.
CLASS B ARE LARGE SPACES AROUND LARGE BUSY AIRPORTS,
AROUND M.S.P., THERE'S A LARGE CLASS B AIR SPACE.
CLASS CAND CLASS D D , AROUND SMALLER AIRPORTS.
AND THE THEN THE REST OF IT IS SHOWN HERE.
THE BIG REASON WHY WE HAVE THIS DELINEATION OF THE AIR
SPACE IS TO ENSURE SAFETY. BASIC IT'S TO MAKE SURE THAT
AIRPLANES DO NOT RUN INTO EACH OTHER, BECAUSE, AGAIN,
DEPENDING ON WHICH AIR SPACE YOU'RE IN, YOU HAVE DIFFERENT
REQUIREMENTS. FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU'RE
OPERATING HERE, CLASS A, YOU'RE ALWAYS IN CONTACT WITH
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, THEY'RE ALWAYS TRACKING YOU, YOU HAVE
TO HAVE PARTICULAR EQUIPMENT ON BOARD.
TO OPERATE IN A CLASS B AIR SPACE, LIKE AROUND HERE, AGAIN
AGAIN, IT'S PRETTY STRICT AND PRETTY STRINGENT.
THERE ARE CERTAIN EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS THAT YOU HAVE TO
HAVE. AND IT GETS LESS AND LESS
STRINGENT AS YOU GO DOWN THE SPACE.
SO, IF YOU'RE GOING TO OPERATE U.A.S., FIRST OF ALL, YOU NEED
TO BE AWARE WHAT KIND OF AIR AIRSPACE YOU'RE GOING TO BE
CLOSE TO AND WHAT KIND OF AIR AIRSPACE TO AVOID BECAUSE OF
SAFETY REASONS. ALL RIGHT.
AND THE OTHER THING ABOUT THE LAWS IS, THEY ARE THERE TO
PROTECT THE PUBLIC BELOW FROM UNSAFE OPERATIONS.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE RULES, THERE ARE DETAILED
INSTRUCTIONS AS TO HOW CLOSE YOU CAN FLY TO STRUCTURES AND
THINGS LIKE THAT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU DON'T, I GUESS, CAUSE
DAMAGE. NOW, IT SEEMS COMMON SENSE
THAT YOU WON'T GO INTO PARTICULAR AIRSPACES AND DO
THINGS THAT YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO.
HOWEVER, APPARENTLY, IT'S NOT NOT -- DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THAT
WAY BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF U.A.S. USE HAPPENING THESE
DAYS WHERE THINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE HAPPENING ARE
HAPPENING. SO -- AND THAT'S WHY THE RULES
ARE -- OUR RULES ARE, I GUESS, BEING PUT IN PLACE.
SO ABOUT THREE OF THEM HERE. JUST THREE CASE STUDIES FROM
JUST RECENTLY WHERE THINGS WERE HAPPENING WITH U.A.S.
THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. THE FIRST ONE IS THERE WAS A
CASE OUT IN CALIFORNIA WHERE U.A.S.s WERE BEING OPERATED
AND THEY WERE INTERFERING WITH PUBLIC GOOD.
THESE WERE THE FIRES THIS PAST SUMMER IN CALIFORNIA, WHERE
FIREFIGHTERS WERE USING AIRCRAFT TO PUT OUT THE FIRE.
AND THEN THERE WERE A LOT OF GAWK I.R.S. USING U. -- GAWK
GAWKERS USING U.A.S.s TO ACTUALLY SEE WHAT WAS GOING ON
TO THE POINT WHERE PILOTS WERE AFRAID OF FLYING SO THEY HAD
TO STOP FLIGHTS IN THAT AREA. SO MUCH SO THAT THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED A WARRANT FOR $75,000
FOR ANY TIPS THAT WOULD LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DRONE
OPERATORS. LATER ON, SOME SAY THAT WAS
KIND OF A -- MAY NOT HAVE BEEN TRUE IN THE SENSE THAT THE
PILOTS MAYBE SAW THINGS THAT WEREN'T THERE.
I CAN TALK FROM EXPERIENCE, THOUGH, BEING AT A FIREWORKS
FIREWORKS -- JULY THE 4th, FIREWORKS, OUT IN CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES AREA, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STEEL AT NIGHT,
EVERYONE THERE WAS WATCHING A FIREWORKS, AND THERE WAS A
COUPLE OF DRONES FLYING AROUND AROUND, WHERE SOMEONE WAS
ILLEGALLY OPERATING IT. SO IT'S HAPPENING, WHICH IS
NOT A GOOD THING. SECOND ONE, THERE'S BEEN CASES
WHERE THERE'S BEEN INTERFERENCE WITH AIRCRAFT
AROUND AIRPORTS. AND I JUST PULLED OUT AN
EXCERPT FROM, IN THIS CASE, IT'S TRANSPORT CANADA, SO
THEY'RE HAVING THE SAME ISSUES WE'RE HAVING.
WHERE A DRONE CAME WITHIN TEN FEET OR TEN METERS, I THINK IT
WAS, OF -- TEN FEET OF AN AIRCRAFT THAT WAS ON AN
APPROACH TO LANDING. AGAIN, SOMETHING THAT
SHOULDN'T HAPPEN, BUT IT'S HAPPENING.
THE LAST ONE, WHICH IS KIND OF PUT HERE FOR COMIC RELIEF, AND
IT WAS, WELL, IF YOU WERE THE GUY INVOLVED, IT WAS NOT FUNNY
FUNNY, THIS HAPPENED OUT IN SAN DIEGO THIS SUMMER, IT WAS
ALL OVER THE NEWS DOWN THERE. A FAMILY WAS OUT AT THE BEACH,
RELAXING AND ENJOYING THEMSELVES.
AND A PERSON WHO WAS DOING REAL ESTATE SURVEYING OR
SOMETHING AKIN TO THAT, HAD A QUAD COPTER, HE STARTED FLYING
IT OVER THE FAMILY VERY CLOSELY.
FATHER GOT ANNOYED, TOOK A TOWEL OR HIS T-SHIRT OR
SOMETHING AND THREW IT AND IT GOT TANGLED
UP IN THE ROTORS OF THE QUAD COPTER, THE QUAD
COPTER CRASHED, THE COPS CAME UP AND, OF COURSE, THINGS TOOK
A STRANGE TANGENT AT THAT POINT.
THEY ACTUALLY ARRESTED HIM FOR VANDALISM AND THROWN IN PRISON
PRISON, IN JAIL, RATHER. ACTUALLY, HE WAS LET GO LATER
ON. BUT THE POINT IS, WE HAVE
PRIVACY VIOLATION THAT IS COULD HAPPEN, INTERFERENCE
WITH PUBLIC GOOD, AND INTERFERENCE WITH AIRCRAFT
OPERATIONS. SO THERE'S GOT TO BE SOME CARE
TAKEN WHEN THESE THINGS ARE BEING USED FOR EITHER
INFRASTRUCTURE, ANYTHING YOU WANT TO USE THEM FOR, JUST BE
AWARE THAT THERE ARE LAWS THERE, AND THE LAWS ARE THERE
BECAUSE THINGS LIKE THIS
CAN HAPPEN.
SO, IF THERE'S ANYONE IN THE CROWD THAT WANTS TO USE U.A.S.
FOR INFRASTRUCTURE APPLICATION APPLICATIONS, ANYTHING THAT
YOU WANT TO USE THEM FOR, THE ADVICE IS, FIRST OF ALL, DON'T
OPERATE THEM WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION.
AND YOU MAY FIND YOURSELF AS PART OF A -- SOME SHERIFF
BOUNTY, IN THIS CASE, THAT'S THE ACTUAL BOUNTY THAT WAS
ISSUED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT.
SO DON'T DO IT, DON'T DO IT I WILL
ILLEGALLY. AND IF YOU WANT TO DO IT LEGAL
LEGALLY, THERE IS A WAY TO DO IT.
ALL RIGHT. SO, IF YOU ARE IN NO HURRY,
AND YOU COULD WAIT UNTIL 2016, SO A YEAR FROM NOW, THEN THERE
IS GOING TO BE A SET OF RULES THAT ARE ISSUED, THE F.A.A.
ISSUED A NOTICE FOR PROPOSED RULE MAKING LAST YEAR, THEY'VE
GOT ALL THE PUBLIC COMMENTS IN IN, AND THE PLAN IS IN ABOUT,
WELL, 2016, THEY'LL ISSUE OUT A SET OF RULES THAT WILL
STREAMLINE ALL U.A.S. OPERATIONS FOR THE SMALL U.A.
U.A.S. SO IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN AN
APPLICATION THEN, YOU CAN LOOK AT THOSE RULES, I'LL GIVE YOU
A HIGHLIGHT OF THEM, AND IF YOU FIT WITHIN CERTAIN
REQUIREMENTS, YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND OPERATE WITHOUT MUCH OF AN
ISSUE. SO THE RULES ARE COMING.
SO THERE IS GOING TO BE GUIDANCE FOR HOW TO OPERATE
THESE VEHICLES. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF YOU ARE
REALLY CHOMPING AT THE BIT, YOU NEED TO GO OUT THERE AND
OPERATE A U.A.S. NOW, THEY ARE LEGAL -- THERE ARE LEGAL WAYS
FOR DOING THIS. AND THERE ARE THREE, ACTUALLY
ACTUALLY, THERE SHOULD BE FOUR WAYS.
I HAVEN'T INCLUDED THE FOURTH ONE.
BUT THE ONE IS, YOU CAN OPERATE YOUR U.A.S. AT ONE OF
THE F.A.A. TEST SITES, THAT DOESN'T DO YOU ANY GOOD IF YOU
HAVE AN APPLICATION IF YOU'RE TRYING TO INSPECT THINGS, OR
APPLY THEM. BUT IF YOU'RE TRYING TO TEST
OUT NEW IDEAS, NEW CONCEPTS ' 'IN A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT,
THEN THESE TEST SITES ARE POTENTIALLY USEFUL FOR YOU.
THERE ARE SIX OF THEM AROUND THE COUNTRY THAT HAVE BEEN
ESTABLISHED. ACTUALLY, THERE'S ONE VERY
CLOSE TO US IN NORTH DAKOTA. SO, THAT'S AN OFFICIAL TEST
SITE, AND YOU COULD CONTACT THE SITE OPERATORS AND GO AND
TEST OUT IDEAS AND OPERATE THEM THERE.
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THAT, THEN THERE ARE TWO OTHER
OPTIONS. ONE IS YOU COULD GET WHAT'S
CALLED A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION, OR COA, WHICH
IS BASICALLY ONLY GRANTED FOR PUBLIC OPERATIONS, SO STATE
AGENCIES OR IF YOU'RE DOING WORK FOR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,
YOU COULD GET A COA, WHICH BASICALLY IS A PLAN OF HOW
YOU'RE PLANNING TO OPERATE THE AIRCRAFT, HOW YOU'RE
MAINTAINING THEM, ET CETERA, THAT YOU SUBMIT TO THE F.A.A.
AND THEY WILL APPROVE IT OR THEY'LL GIVE YOU COMMENTS AND
MAKE CHANGES TO IT TO APPROVE IT.
SO THERE'S A WAY TO DO IT LEGALLY.
THAT'S WHAT WE DO HERE AT THE U OF M, AT LEAST IN OUR LAB,
WE HAVE A PROCESS WHERE WE GET COAs AND WE FLY THEM USING C
COAs. IF YOU'RE NOT A PUBLIC AGENCY,
AND YOU WANT TO DO THIS ON YOUR OWN AS A PRIVATE ENTITY,
THEN THERE'S SOMETHING CALLED A SECTION 333 EXEMPTION THAT
YOU COULD GET. AGAIN, THE PROCEDURES ARE
THERE, YOU COULD APPLY FOR THEM AND GET THE PERMIT TO
OPERATE THEM LEGALLY. THERE ARE RESTRICTIONS, YOU
CAN'T OPERATE AROUND AIRPORTS, FOR EXAMPLE, OR YOU CAN'T
OPERATE AROUND BUSY AREAS WHERE THERE'S BUSY AIR TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC, YOU CAN'T OPERATE AROUND WHERE THERE COULD BE
POTENTIAL HAZARD TO PEOPLE AROUND AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.
SO THERE ARE RESTRICTIONS, BUT THERE ARE WAYS OF DOING IT.
I'VE HEARD SOME
FOLKS THAT HAVE APPLIED FOR THESE
COMPLAIN THAT IT TAKES TOO LONG TO GET.
OUR EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN THAT IT'S THE TURNAROUND HAS
ACTUALLY BEEN PRETTY GOOD AND PRETTY QUICK FOR US TO GET
PERMITS TO DO WHAT WE NEED TO DO.
AND, AGAIN, IN THE PRECISION AGRICULTURE WORK WE DO,
THERE'S A COLLABORATOR OF OURS UP AT CROOKSTON, WHO HAS QUITE
A BIT OF THESE COAs, ALL OVER THE STATE, FOR OPERATING
QUAD COPTERS, AND, AGAIN, THEY'VE FIGURED OUT HOW TO DO
IT AND IT'S DOABLE. SO, MORAL OF THE STORY, THERE
ARE WAYS TO FLY THESE THINGS LEGALLY, DON'T FLY THEM
ILLEGALLY. THAT'S AT LEAST ONE -- ONE OF
THE MESSAGES I WANT TO IMPART WITH THIS TALK.
IF YOU CAN WAIT UNTIL 016, -- 2016, HERE ARE THE RULES THAT
ARE COMING DOWN THE PIKE, WHICH WILL, AGAIN, IF YOU
COULD SHOW THAT YOUR U.A.V., OR U.A.S. SATISFIES THESE
REQUIREMENTS, YOU REALLY DON'T HAVE TO TALK TO ANYONE, YOU
COULD POTENTIALLY GO OUT AND FLY THEM.
AND THE RULES ARE GOING TO BE, FIRST OF ALL, YOUR U.A.S. MUST
BE LESS THAN 55 POUNDS SO, IT'S GOING TO BE IN THAT CLASS
2 OR CLASS -- CLASS 1 OR 2 CATEGORY.
IT CAN'T FLY MORE THAN 100 MILES PER HOUR, WHICH I DON'T
THINK IS AN ISSUE FOR MOST OF THE U.A.S.s THAT ARE GOING
TO BE USED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT AND APPLICATIONS.
LESS THAN 500 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL.
AND SO ON. HERE IS AN INTERESTING ONE.
YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO OPERATE THEM DIRECTLY OVER PEOPLE THAT
ARE NOT -- THAT ARE NOT DIRECT DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE
OPERATION. NOW, AS PART OF THE PROJECT
PATHFINDER INITIATIVE, CN IS WORKING WITH THE -- CNN IS
WORKING WITH THE F.A.A. TO COME UP WITH THE TECHNOLOGY,
THE RULES, THE WAYS THAT THAT CAN BE ALLOWED BECAUSE THEY
WANT TO USE IT FOR NEWS- NEWS-GATHERING PURPOSES,
MAYBE IN THE FUTURE THERE MIGHT BE A WAY FOR DOING IT
BUT THAT'S STILL SOMETHING THAT'S BEING EXPLORED.
DAYLIGHT OPERATIONS, DON'T FLY THEM AT NIGHT.
LINE OF SIGHT OPERATIONS, YOU HAVE TO ALWAYS BE ABLE TO SEE
THE U.A.S. YOU CAN'T SEND IT OVER THE
HORIZON TO DO SOMETHING WHERE IT'S NOT IN DIRECT VIEW OF YOU
YOU. AND IT WILL BECOME OBVIOUS
WHEN I START TALKING ABOUT TECHNOLOGIES IN A SECOND WHY
THAT IS. AND THEN ON THE OPERATOR SIDE
OF THE HOUSE, THERE'S ALL KINDS OF THINGS THAT THEY'RE
GOING TO REQUIRE. BUT ONE OF THEM IS THAT ANYONE
CAN'T GO OUT AND OPERATE THESE U.A.S.
IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE SOMEONE THAT IS GOING TO BE
VETTED BY THE T.S.A. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
SO, -- BUT THERE ARE RULES COMING OUT AND ONCE THE RULES
ARE OUT THERE, THEN THERE'S GOING TO BE A STREAMLINED WAY
OF OPERATING THESE SMALL U.A. U.A.S.
WITH THAT, SO, THIS WILL SOLVE SOME OF THE PROBLEMS, NOT ALL
OF IT. SO WHAT ARE THE TECHNICAL
CHALLENGES THAT REMAIN? THAT HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED.
SO, THERE ARE TWO OF THEM. AT LEAST AS FAR AS I CAN SEE
THEM. AND THE CHALLENGE, ONE OF THEM
THEM, IS RELIABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS.
CAN THEY BE MADE RELIABLE? RIGHT NOW RELIABILITY IS KIND
OF ON THE ATROCIOUS SIDE AND PARTLY BECAUSE A LOT OF THE
HARDWARE THAT GOES INTO THESE SMALL U.A.S. COME FROM THE
HOBBYIST OR REMOTE CONTROL AIRCRAFT COMMUNITY AND THEY
WERE NEVER INTENDED TO BE RELIABLE, INDUSTRIAL-GRADE
TYPE OF SYSTEMS. SO, THEY'RE NOT PARTICULARLY
RELIABLE. BUT THE OTHER PART OF IT IS,
ALMOST ALL OF THEM, AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT THIS A LITTLE MORE
IN DETAIL, RELY ON G.P.S. OR G GNSS WHICH IS A GENERAL EN
ENCOMPASSING TERM FOR ALL KINDS OF G.P.S. SYSTEMS.
THEY ALL DEPEND ON THAT AND WHENEVER THERE IS A DENIAL, A
STRESSING OR A SPOOFING OF G. G.P.S., BAD THINGS HAPPEN,
I'LL SHOW ONE CASE STUDY WHERE SOMETHING REALLY WENT BAD WITH
A PARTICULAR U.A.V. WHEN THEY LOST G.P.S.
THE OTHER ONE, WHICH IS NOT REALLY A BIG ISSUE WITH THE
SMALL U.A.S., IS THE PROBLEM OF SENSITIVE VOID.
-- SENSE AND AVOID. THAT IS, HOW CAN YOU DETECT
OTHER AIRCRAFT IN THE VICINITY OR OTHER COLLISION THREATS AND
AVOID THEM? WITH THE SMALL U.A.S., BECAUSE
THE LAWS ARE GOING TO BE, YOU CAN ONLY OPERATE THESE WHEN
THEY'RE DIRECTLY IN THE LINE OF SIGHT OF YOU, THAT ISSUE
GOES AWAY, BECAUSE THE OPERATOR BECOMES THE PERSON
THAT MAKES SURE THAT COLLISIONS DON'T HAPPEN.
BUT FOR THE LARGER U.A.V.s, OR FOR OVER THE HORIZON TYPE
OF OPERATIONS, THIS IS GOING TO BE A BIG CHALLENGE.
AND IT'S A BIG CHALLENGE, AND THIS IS THE ONLY THING I'LL
SAY ABOUT IT, BECAUSE IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE WAY AIR
DRAFT OPERATE THESE DAYS, -- AIRCRAFT OPERATE THESE DAYS,
IN THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE, THERE ARE LAYERS AND LAYERS OF
DEFENSE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU DON'T HIT SOMEONE ELSE OR YOU
DON'T HAVE COLLISIONS, SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU'RE FLYING IN A
CONDITION WHERE YOU'RE ABLE TO LOOK OUT THE WINDOW AND THE
WEATHER'S GOOD ENOUGH THAT YOU CAN SEE OTHER AIRCRAFT
AROUND, THERE ARE TWO LAYERS OF
DEFENSE. THE FIRST LAYER OF DEFENSE IS
THIS THING I'VE DRAWN HERE, WHICH IS GRAY, WHICH IS THE
AIRSPACE AND PROCEDURES. SO THAT CHART I SHOWED YOU AT
THE BEGINNING, THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE IS BROKEN UP INTO ALL
KINDS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS. THAT HAS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL
KINDS OF PROCEDURES THAT SAY, YOU CAN FLY HERE OR YOU CAN'T
FLY HERE, SO ON IS AND SO FORTH.
SO THERE'S A BIG LAYER OF DEFENSE THERE THAT PREVENTS
UNSAFE OPERATIONS FROM HAPPENING.
AND THEN AT THE CLOSEST LEVEL, THERE'S THE PILOT'S EYES THAT
PREVENT AIRCRAFT FROM COLLIDING, THE PILOT'S
EYEBALLS ACT AS A CENSOR FOR PREVENTING THAT -- SENSOR FOR
PREVENTING THAT. IF YOU'RE IN CONDITIONS WHERE
YOU CAN'T SEE OUT THE WINDOW, AS AN OPERATOR, THERE'S STILL
LAYERS AND LAYERS OF DEFENSE, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, AIR
TRAFFIC CONTROL RADARS, PROCEDURES, AND ONBOARD
EQUIPMENT THAT MAKES SURE THAT YOU ARE SEPARATED.
SO, FOR U.A.S., WHAT TECHNOLOGIES ARE THERE THAT
ARE GOING TO MAKE THE SUBSTITUTION FOR THE PILOT'S
EYES? THAT'S THE WHOLE SENSE AND
AVOID PRODUCT. CAN WE PUT SENSORS ON BOARD
THESE VEHICLES THAT ARE ABLE TO WORK WITH ALL OF THESE
DEFENSES AND AT LAST SUBSTITUTE FOR THE LAST ONE,
WHICH IS THE PILOT'S EYE BEING ABLE TO SEE OTHER COLLISION
THREATS AND AVOID THEM? FOR THE SMALL U.A.S. LINE OF
SIGHT OPERATIONS, THAT'S A NON NONISSUE.
BUT, AGAIN, THIS IS A BIG CHALLENGE AND THERE'S A LOT OF
OF, I GUESS, A LOT OF ENERGY AND A LOT OF EFFORT BEING
THROWN AT IT. BUT, AGAIN, IT'S A NONISSUE
FOR THE SMALL U.A.S. THAT ARE USED IN INFRASTRUCTURE
INSPECTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT.
SO, WHAT ARE THE OTHER TECHNICAL ISSUES?
WELL, ALL, AS I SAID, WHAT I'M REALLY GOING TO FOCUS ON FOR
THE REST OF THIS, FOR WHATEVER WHATEVER -- THE REMAINING PART
OF THIS TALK IS THE FACT THAT ALL THE U.A.S. GUIDANCE
SYSTEMS THAT ARE USED FOR KEEPING THEM AFLOAT AND
CONTROLLED ALL RELY ON THE AVAILABILITY OF G.P.S.
G.P.S. IS CENTRAL TO THEM. AND WHAT I'M SHOWING HERE ARE
THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF AUTOPILOT THAT IS ARE USED FOR
CONTROLLING -- AUTO PILOTS THAT ARE USED FOR CONTROLLING
U.A.S., THESE ARE BASICALLY THE BRAINS THAT GUIDE THE U.A.
U.A.S. THAT'S AGAIN, A PROFESSIONAL OFF THE SHELF
SOLUTION, CES TREMENDOUSLY, THERE ARE THE HOBBYIST VERSION
VERSIONS WHICH YOU CAN BUY, AGAIN, IF YOU'RE USING THESE
FOR ACTUAL USEFUL REVENUE- REVENUE-GENERATING PURPOSES,
PERHAPS YOU MAY NOT WANT TO USE HOBBY OPEN SOURCE VERSION.
AND HERE'S A RESEARCH VERSION THAT WE HERE AT THE U OF M
HAVE BUILT WHICH, AGAIN, IN OUR CASE, I'LL TELL YOU WHY WE
HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THAT THAT WE USE.
BUT ALL OF THESE SYSTEMS, ALL ACROSS THE BOARD, AT THE HEART
OF THEM IS G.P.S. SO, IF G.P.S. IS UNAVAILABLE
FOR SOME REASON, THEIR PERFORM PERFORMANCE SUFFERS REAL REAL
BAD, BADLY. KESTREL.
AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS, IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE ON
ONBOARD CONTROL SYSTEM ON ALL ALL -- ON MOST FLIGHT CONTROL
SYSTEMS, THEY LOOK SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
THEY HAVE A CONTROL SYSTEM FOR BASICALLY MANIPULATING
CONTROLS AND TAKING THE AIRCRAFT WHERE IT NEEDS TO GO.
THERE'S A GUIDANCE SYSTEM THAT TELLS BASICALLY GENERATES PATH
PATHS AS TO WHERE THE AIRCRAFT SHOULD GO.
AND THEN YOU HAVE A NAVIGATION NAVIGATION, ATTITUDE
DETERMINATION SYSTEM THAT DETERMINES WHERE THE VEHICLE
IS SO THAT YOU DON'T COLLIDE WITH THINGS AND WHAT THE
ORIENTATION IS FOR CONTROL. AND ALL OF THAT IS FED WITH
SENSORS AND THE KEY SENSOR HERE IS G.P.S.
SO WHEN G.P.S. GOES AWAY, MOST OF THESE SYSTEMS START
BEHAVING RATHER POORLY. AND, IN PARTICULAR, THE
POSITION ESTIMATE SUFFERS REAL BAD.
AS G.P.S. GOES AWAY, WHAT YOU SEE WITH THESE U.A.S. FLIGHT
CONTROL SYSTEMS 'IS THE POSITION SOLUTION STARTS DRIFT
DRIFTING AND STARTS BECOMING VERY VERY LARGE.
SO, IF YOU'RE TRYING TO FLY, FOR EXAMPLE, U.A.S. CLOSE TO A
BRIDGE OR A -- CLOSE TO A BRIDGE OR CLOSE TO SOME SORT
OF AN INFRASTRUCTURE, -- HOPE HOPEFULLY I DIDN'T BREAK THIS
THIS -- THEN AS THE G.P.S. SOLUTION GOES AWAY, THEN THE
POSITION SOLUTION IS GOING TO GET POORER AND POORER AND
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO KNOW WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE IN A
COLLISION THREAT OR NOT. THE REASON I BROUGHT UP THAT
PICTURE OF THE BRIDGE, IF YOU'RE OPERATING CLOSE TO A
LARGE METALLIC STRUCTURE THAT'S REFLECTING G.P.S.
SIGNALS, YOU'RE GOING TO START GETTING DEGRADEED PERFORMANCE.
AND, SO, YOU'RE NOT VERY SURE HOW -- YOUR POSITION SOLUTION
STARTS DEGRADING SO YOU GOT TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT THAT.
ANYTHING THAT'S A LARGE REFLECTING SURFACE IS GOING TO
START AFFECTING G.P.S. SOLUTION.
SO THAT'S AN ISSUE. THE VELOCITY AND ATTITUDE
ESTIMATES ALSO BECOME VERY POOR.
PARTICULARLY IN THE CASE OF ATTITUDE, WHICH IS BASICALLY
THE ORIENTATION OF THE VEHICLE VEHICLE, IN A ROUNDABOUT WAY
IT ALMOST ALWAYS DEPENDS ON G. G.P.S. BEING AVAILABLE.
SO BAD ATTITUDE ESTIMATES USUALLY LEAD TO LOSS OF
CONTROL, SO THAT'S A -- THAT'S KIND OF A SECONDARY EFFECT,
BUT WHEN G.P.S. GOES AWAY, YOU COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE ALSO
THESE KIND OF ISSUES. NOW, FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS
ALSO HAVE A FALL-BACK PROCEDURE WHERE THEY CONTINUE
GENERATING GOOD VELOCITY AND POSITION ESTIMATES -- SORRY,
GOOD VELOCITY AND ATTITUDE ESTIMATES BUT ALMOST ALWAYS
THE POSITION SOLUTION IS GOING TO BE PRETTY BAD WHEN G.P.S.
GOES AWAY. SO THERE HAVE TO BE
ALTERNATIVES FOR USING G.P.S. THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES THAT
HAVE BEEN LOOKED AT. VISION SYSTEMS ARE BEING
LOOKED AT. AND, AGAIN, SOME AUTOPILOTS DO
HAVE THE ABILITY TO USE CAMERAS AND CAMERA-BASED
NAVIGATION FOR LOCATING THEMSELVES.
THERE ARE OTHERS THAT ARE LOOKING AT THE CONCEPT OF WHAT
ARE CALLED SIGNALS OF OPPORTUNITY.
IN THIS CASE, WHY NOT USE SIGNALS THAT ARE ALL AROUND
THE CITY THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY OR THE ENVIRONMENT
THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY DESIGNED FOR NAVIGATION
PURPOSES BUT YOU COULD EXTRACT NAVIGATION INFORMATION OUT OF
THEM? RADIO SIGNALS, TV SIGNALS.
WE'VE ACTUALLY DONE SOME WORK USING CELL PHONE SIGNALS.
WE WERE ABLE TO PUT TOGETHER A SYSTEM THAT ALLOWED A U.A.V.
TO LIMP BACK HOME AFTER G.P.S. WAS DENIED, BUT, AGAIN, NOT
VERY ACCURATE. MORE WORK TO BE DONE THERE.
AND THEN THERE ARE IDEAS THAT ARE BEING FLOATED AROUND WHERE
YOU COULD USE NETWORKED NAVIGATION, WHERE IT'S THE
WHOLE CONCEPT OR THE BUZZ WORD THESE DAYS OF THE INTERNET OF
THINGS, WHERE IF YOU HAVE A FLOCK OF U.A.V.s THAT ARE
PERHAPS INSPECTING A BRIDGE OR WORKING TOGETHER, THEN
COOPERATIVELY THEY COULD START EXCHANGING INFORMATION WHEREBY
THEY COULD TRY TO KEEP THEIR POSITION SOLUTION IN CHECK
EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF G.P.S. SO, WHAT I'LL DO IN THE NEXT
FEW SLIDES IS ACTUALLY TALK ABOUT SOME OF THIS, SOME OF
THE WORK WE'VE DONE IN THIS AREA, TO SHOW YOU THAT IT'S
ACTUALLY A POTENTIAL SOLUTION. BUT THE POINT, I THINK, THE
MOST IMPORTANT PART OF IT IS THAT ALL THESE FLIGHT CONTROL
SYSTEMS ARE, AGAIN, SMALL, HAVE VERY LITTLE, USUALLY THE
COMPUTATIONAL HORSEPOWER IS NOT VERY HIGH, SO THERE'S NOT
GOING TO BE ONE SILVER BULLET SOLUTION THAT IS GOING TO WORK
FOR ALL THE APPLICATIONS. IT'S DEPENDING ON YOUR
APPLICATION, DEPENDING ON THE MISSION YOU'RE TRYING TO USE,
TRYING TO APPLY FOR, YOU WILL HAVE A BACKUP SYSTEM FOR G.P.
G.P.S., EITHER IT'S GOING TO BE A VISION-BASED SYSTEM, IT'S
GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT'S MAYBE A SIGNAL OPPORTUNITY
SYSTEM, BUT IT'S GOING TO PHENOMENON ON WHAT THE
APPLICATION -- DEPEND ON WHAT THE APPLICATION ONHAND IS.
AGAIN, I'M NOT CONVINCED THAT THAT, AND IT HAY MAP -- IT MAY
HAPPEN, BUT AT LEAST RIGHT NOW THE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS
THAT ARE OUT THERE FOR SMALL U.A.S., THEY DON'T HAVE THE
CAPABILITY TO DOING ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS.
IT'S G.P.S. AND SOMETHING ELSE OR VISION, G.P.S. AND
SOMETHING ELSE. SO, DEPENDING ON THE
APPLICATION, DEPENDING ON THE MISSION, THERE'S GOING TO HAVE
TO BE SOME SORT OF A BACKUP FOR G.P.S./GNSS.
SO, THE IDEA OF COOPERATIVE NAVIGATION, OR NETWORK
NAVIGATION WITH THE U.A.S., THIS IS AN IDEA THAT WE PLAYED
AROUND WITH, LOOKED AT. AND, AGAIN, THE IDEA IS,
IMAGINE, IF YOU WILL, I HAVE AN OPERATION WHERE I'M
INSPECTING PERHAPS, SAY, A BRIDGE, I HAVE A U.A.S., A
QUAD COPTER, IN THIS CASE, THAT'S OPERATING UNDER THE
BRIDGE. WHICH WOULD BE A CASE OF AN
AREA WHERE GNS OR G.P.S. WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE.
AT THE SAME TIME YOU HAVE OTHERS THAT ARE COOPERATING,
THAT ARE SITTING OUTSIDE, FLYING AND ARE IN VIEW OF G.P.
G.P.S. SATELLITES. THESE U.A.S. WILL BE ABLE TO
GET G.P.S. SOLUTION AND HAVE VERY ACCURATE POSITION
SOLUTIONS AND ATTITUDE SOLUTIONS.
ON THE OTHER HAND, THIS ONE WILL NOT.
SO, IS THERE A WAY, FOR EXAMPLE, TO HAVE INFORMATION
FROM
THESE U.S.s, BEING SUPPLIED TO THE OTHER U.A.S.
TO HELP IT IN FIGURING OUT WHERE IT IS WHEN G.P.S. IS NOT
AVAILABLE IN THIS PARTICULAR OPERATION.
SO IF YOU NETWORK THESE VEHICLES, CAN YOU DO THAT?
AND THE ANSWER IS, SOMEWHAT. 4 AND IT'S ONE POTENTIAL WAY
TO DEAL WITH THE GNSS DENIAL OR THE UNABLE TO OF GNSS WHEN
YOU'RE OPERATING IN PLACES LIKE THIS WHERE, AGAIN, A LOT
OF THESE APPLICATIONS, UNDER A BRIDGE, CLOSE TO STRUCTURES,
IS GOING TO BE A CASE WHERE THE G.P.S. SERVICES ARE NOT
GOING TO BE THE BEST. SO IT'S KIND OF COMMON SENSE,
IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, OR MAYBE NOT, BUT THAT IF THIS
VEHICLE HERE HAS A VERY GOOD POSITION SOLUTION, AND THIS
ONE COULD RANGE SOMEHOW EITHER BY MEASURING TIME OF FLIGHT OF
A RADIO SIGNAL OR BY SOME OTHER METHOD, COULD FIGURE OUT
HOW -- WHERE IT IS RELATIVE TO THIS ONE, THEN IT SHOULD BE
ABLE TO FIGURE OUT WHERE IT IS AND THERE SHOULD BE A WAY OF
FLOWING DOWN INFORMATION INTO THAT PARTICULAR THIRD U.A.S.
WHILE IT APPEARS THAT IT'S STRAIGHTFORWARD, IN REALITY,
WHEN YOU PUT THINGS TOGETHER LIKE THIS, THERE ARE ALL KINDS
OF ISSUES THAT COME UP. AND, IN PARTICULAR, IT TURNS
OUT THAT IF YOU DON'T DESIGN THE NETWORK THE RIGHT WAY, YOU
COULD END UP HAVING CASES WHERE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY
ENDS UP BECOMING DESTABILIZED BECAUSE ERRORS FROM
ONE, ERRORS FROM ONE, FROM THIS ONE
ONE, FOR EXAMPLE, WILL END UP FEEDING UP INTO HERE, AND IF
THIS ONE EXCHANGES INFORMATION WITH THIS ONE, GOES BACK THERE
THERE, THEN YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF A FEEDBACK THAT CAUSES
THINGS TO DESTABLEIZE. BUT, ANYWAY, I'LL SPARE YOU
THE DETAILS OF THE ESTIMATEORS THAT WERE PUT TOGETHER FOR
DOING THESE KIND OF THINGS, BUT I'LL SHOW YOU RESULTS.
SO, STEPPING BACK. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE
INTERESTED IN IS USING U.A.S. FOR THESE APPLICATIONS.
A LOT OF THESE APPLICATIONS, G.P.S. IS NOT AVAILABLE.
MAYBE UNDER A BRIDGE, OR YOU MAY BE CLOSE TO A STRUCTURE.
SO IF YOU'RE COOPERATING WITH OTHER U.A.S. THAT ACTUALLY
HAVE VISIBILITY TOWARDS G.P.S. AND YOU'RE EXCHANGING
INFORMATION, HOW WELL DOES THAT WORK?
SO THESE ARE ACTUALLY RESULTS FROM ACTUAL U.A.V. FLIGHT
TESTS THAT WE DID TO TEST OUT THIS IDEA.
AND IN THIS CASE, WE HAD A SWARM.
FIVE U.A.S. THAT WERE OPERATING IN A GNSS-DENIED
APPLICATION, UNDER A BRIDGE, FOR EXAMPLE, AND THEN TWO OF
THEM, HAD VISIBILITY TOWARD G. G.P.S. AND THEY WERE
EXCHANGING INFORMATION FOR THAT PURPOSE.
SO, THESE LINES SHOW THE PERFORMANCE, SO, EACH ONE OF
THESE LINES REPRESENTS A POSITION ERROR GROWTH.
SO, WHAT YOU SEE THIS LINE CALLED COASTING, THAT IS THE
SOLUTION OF YOUR TRADITIONAL FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM THAT
YOU'D FIND ON A U.A.S. WHEN G. G.P.S. GOES AWAY.
THEY ALL USE SENSORS THAT ARE MEASURING ACCELERATION AND
THAT, WITHOUT G.P.S. ARRESTING THOSE ERRORS, WILL CONTINUE TO
GROW, IN THIS CASE, AFTER FIVE MINUTES OF OPERATION, WITHOUT
G.P.S., THEY'RE WAY UP AT THE 800-METER, OR THE KILOMETER
TYPE OF AN ERROR STATE. THERE ARE ALL THESE OTHER
TYPES OF APPROACHES, BUT LET'S JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THE TWO
LINES HERE AT THE BOTTOM. SO, H.F. STANDS FOR HIGH FLYER
AND THAT MEANS THIS IS A U.A. U.A.S. THAT'S OUTSIDE AND
ACTUALLY BEING ABLE TO SEE G. G.P.S. AND IT'S COMMUNICATING
WITH THESE OTHER FIVE THAT ARE NOT SEEING IT.
AND BY DOING THAT, YOU'RE ABLE TO ACTUALLY KEEP ERRORS IN
CHECK AND AT A FAIRLY SMALL LEVEL, LESS THAN A FEW HUNDRED
METERS, ACTUALLY IN THE CASE OF THIS PARTICULAR CASE, MORE
THAN ON THE ORDER OF TENS OF METERS, BUT THE POINT IS THAT
THIS IS AFTER 400 SECONDS, OR FIVE MINUTES' WORTH OF
OPERATION, SO FOR MOST OF THESE OPERATIONS, YOU'RE GOING
TO BE DOING INS AND OUTS OUT OF G.P.S. DENIAL.
SO YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ACTUALLY OPERATING FOR A VERY
VERY LONG TIME. SO THE COOPERATIVE APPROACH
MIGHT BE ONE WAY TO ANSWER SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS WITH
DENIAL OF G.P.S. SERVICES. BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS, THERE
HAS TO BE A WAY OF SWITCHING BACK AND FORTH FROM G.P.S.
BEING AVAILABLE AND NOT. BECAUSE, AGAIN, FLIGHT CONTROL
SYSTEMS THAT ARE OUT THERE FOR U.A.S. OFF-THE-SHELF SOLUTIONS
TODAY ACTUALLY ALMOST ALL RELY ON G.P.S. BEING AVAILABLE AND
WITHOUT G.P.S. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO WORK VERY WELL.
SO THAT'S A BIG CHALLENGE THAT HAS TO BE ADDRESSED.
NONG.P.S.-BASED NAVIGATION SYSTEM THAT IS AS GOOD AS G.P.
G.P.S. TO HELP IN THESE KIND OF OPERATIONS.
AGAIN, VISION IS A GOOD CANDIDATE AND IT'S BEEN USED
SUCCESSFULLY BUT IT'S NOT THE CATCH-ALL, IT'S NOT THE
SOLUTION FOR ALL PROBLEMS. ALL RIGHT.
SO, THE LAST ONE THAT I'M GOING TALK ABOUT, AND IT'S ONE
THAT'S ACTUALLY CATCHING SOME ATTENTION, IS THE NOTION OF
POSITION AUTHENTICATION AND GEOFENCING THAT'S BEING TALKED
ABOUT AND THE USE OF UA.S.s FOR ALL KINDS OF -- U.A.S.s
FOR ALL KINDS OF APPLICATIONS. HERE'S A MAP, JUST TO PUT A
HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIO. HERE'S A MAP OF THE AREA
AROUND THE "U." THE RAILROAD TRACKS, AND I'M
IMAGINEING THAT I HAVE A U.A.S. THAT'S OUT THERE DOING
INSPECTIONS. HERE'S THE TCF STADIUM WHERE
THERE'S GOING TO BE LOTS AND LOTS OF PEOPLE ON FOOTBALL
DAYS. SO, IT'S DEFINITELY NOT LEGAL
TO FLY A U.A.S. OVER POPULATED AREAS.
SO, HOW DO YOU MAKE SURE THAT A U.A.S. DOES NOT STRAY AND GO
INTO AREAS WHERE IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO GO TO?
RIGHT? I MEAN, THERE WAS THE CASE
WITH U.A.S.s FLYING INTO PLACE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.,
WHERE THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE, RIGHT?
SO THE IDEA OF GEOFENCING IS COMING UP.
SO THE IDEA IS, YOU'LL SET UP A FENCE, IT'S GOING TO BE A
VIRTUAL FENCE OF SOME SORT. AROUND SOME AREA THAT WILL
PREVENT THE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS ON THE U.A.S. FROM
GOING PAST THAT REGION. SO, -- AND SOME OF THE U.A.S.,
SOME OF THE QUAD COPTERS SHOWING UP NOW ARE STARTING TO
HAVE THESE THINGS IN THEM, SO IF THE G.P.S. SOLUTIONS, YOU
ARE HERE AND YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE HERE, THEN YOU
DON'T GO IN. SO THAT'S A GEOFENCE.
BUT THERE ARE ISSUES THAT REMAIN WITH THAT.
AND THERE ARE TWO THAT ARE ACTUALLY BEING BROUGHT UP.
ONE IS HOW DO YOU POLICE THIS? HOW DO YOU MAKE SURE THAT A U.
U.A.S. DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS? ONE WAY YOU COULD DO IT IS
POTENTIALLY ASK IT TO REPORT BACK TO SOME CENTRAL
AUTHENTICATING AGENCY, I SUPPOSE, THAT'S DOING THAT.
BASICALLY HAVING SOMETHING EQUIVALENT TO A FLIGHT AIR
TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM. THAT'S AN IDEA THAT'S BEING
LOOKED AT. THERE'S A WHOLE SERIES OF
OPTIONS OF THEM THAT ARE BEING LOOKED AT BY NASA AIMS, BUT
THAT'S ONE POTENTIAL WAY OF DOING IT.
THE OTHER WAY OF IT, YOU COULD TRUST THE ACTUAL SYSTEM ON
BOARD TO DO THIS. BUT EITHER WAY, THERE'S A
DANGER, AND IT'S A REAL DANGER DANGER, ACTUALLY, THAT YOU
COULD HAVE THE CASE WHERE, IN THE CASE OF THE REPORT-BACK,
THEY COULD SAY, I AM HERE, WHEN, IN FACT, THEY'RE PAST
THAT GEE HE OWE -- GEOFENCE. OR YOU COULD SOMEHOW SPOOF
THE SYSTEM ON BOARD TO THINK THAT IT'S HERE, WHEN, IN FACT,
IT'S IN THIS SPACE. NOW, WITH G.P.S., THIS IS
ACTUALLY A POSSIBILITY, AS A MATTER OF FACT, TODD HUMPHREYS
HUMPHREYS, WHO WAS A SPEAKER HERE LAST WEEK, A COUPLE YEARS
AGO, SHOWED THAT, THAT HE COULD DO IT VERY EASILY.
YOU COULD ACTUALLY DESIGN SPOOFERS THAT ARE ABLE TO GRAB
HOLD OF A G.P.S. RECEIVEER ON A PARTICULAR VEHICLE AND STEER
IT AWAY FROM WHERE IT THINKS IT IS.
SO IT'S GETTING EASIER AND EASIER TO DO.
IT'S NOT TRIVIAL, BUT IT CAN BE DONE.
NOW, IF YOU LOOK AT G.P.S., THE SIGNAL THAT COMES DOWN
FROM THE SATELLITES, THERE ARE SEVERAL VERSIONS OF IT,
THERE'S A VERSION THAT'S ONLY AVAILABLE TO DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE-AUTHORIZED USERS, THAT VERSION OF THE SIGNAL HAS A
MODULE BUILT IN IT CALLED THE ANTISPOOFING MODULE, WHICH
WILL PREVENT YOU FROM DOING THESE KIND OF THINGS.
SO THE QUESTION THAT IS BEING ASKED IS, WITH G.P.S., CAN YOU
COME UP WITH, FOR THE CIVILIAN VERSION OF THINGS, CAN YOU DO
SOMETHING EQUIVALENT TO THAT TO PREVENT SOMEONE FROM SPOOF
SPOOFING? THERE ARE MANY SOLUTIONS BEING
THROWN AROUND. BUT IT'S A -- AGAIN, IT'S A
REAL ISSUE AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE SOLVED BEFORE
WE START SEEING THESE VEHICLES FLYING AROUND DAY IN AND DAY
OUT. I MEAN, YOU COULD THINK ABOUT
THE AMAZON DELIVERY MODEL. RIGHT?
IF YOU COULD SPOOF IT, THEN YOU'RE GOING TO START GETTING
A LOT OF FREE STUFF RATHER THAN HAVING TO PAY FOR IT,
RIGHT? SO THAT'S A POSSIBILITY.
SO, THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO CAUSE THIS PROBLEM.
ONE IS WHAT'S CALLED A FALSE POSITION REPORT AND THE OTHER
ONE IS FALSE IF I FALSIFICATION. WE'VE DONE SOME WORK IN THIS
AREA IN THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS TO UP COME UP WITH
SOLUTIONS. TO MAKE SURE THAT WE COULD
AUTHENTICATE ACTUALLY THAT SOMEONE IS WHERE THEY SAY THEY
ARE. IT'S A SYSTEM THAT WAS PUT
TOGETHER, IT'S A BASICALLY WHAT IT IS, IT'S A SYSTEM THAT
WOULD SIT AT SOME TRUSTED AUTHENTICATEOR SITE, THE
VEHICLE THAT'S OPERATING WILL PERIODICALLY SEND A SNIPPET OF
THE SIGNALS THAT IT'S SEEING BACK TO THIS AUTHENTICATEOR,
THE AUTHENTICATEOR WILL COMPARE THAT SIGNAL TO WHAT'S COMING
DOWN FROM G.P.S. SATELLITES TO DECIDE WHETHER THAT PERSON IS
LYING OR IF THEY ARE WHERE THEY ACTUALLY ARE.
AND THE WAY IT WORKS, REALLY, IS THE ANALOGY I GIVE IS THIS
ONE, THE G.P.S. SIGNAL HAS BURIED IN IT, IF YOU WANT TO
THINK OF IT AS A WATER MARK, THAT NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT,
EXCEPT FOR D.O.D. AUTHORIZED USERS, HOWEVER, IF I TAKE A
COPY OF THAT SIGNAL, TAKE A COPY OF THAT SIGNAL FROM
SOMEWHERE ELSE, PUT THE TWO TOGETHER, I DON'T NEED TO KNOW
WHAT THE SECRET CODE ON THAT SIGNAL IS, BUT I COULD DO THE
MATCHING TO AUTHENTICATE THE TWO, AND FIGURE OUT WHETHER OR
NOT WHAT I'M SEEING IS A FALSE SIGNAL OR TRUE SIGNALS.
AND THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT WE TESTED OUT, THAT'S ABOUT
COMING ON TWO YEARS NOW SINCE WE ACTUALLY DID THIS, WHERE WE
PUT THIS AWE TENTY INDICATOR TOGETHER, WE TOOK A G.P.S.
RECEIVEER, PUT IT AT POINT A, INITIALLY SAID, HAVE IT REPORT
BACK SAYING, I'M AT POINT AVENUE A.
WE HAD IT MOVE TO POINT B, C, D, BUT AT EACH TIME IT GOT
THERE, IT STILL SAID, I'M AT POINT A.
IN OTHER WORDS, IT WAS LYING. WOULD THE AUTHENTICATEOR BE
ABLE TO CATCH IT, YES, IT DOES DOES.
THE WAY WE PUT IT TOGETHER, IT'S ABLE TO PICK OUT FALSE
REPORTS WITHIN 15 METERS, SO IF YOU ARE NOT WITHIN 15
METERS OF WHERE YOU SAY YOU ARE, IT WILL RAISE AN AALARM.
NOW, THIS WAS A COOL INTERESTING, FUN PROJECT TO DO
DO, BUT I DON'T THINK THIS IS GOING TO BE A VERY PRACTICAL
WAY TO DO IT FOR U.A.S. BECAUSE, AGAIN, IT'S GOING TO
REQUIRE THAT YOU HAVE AN AUTHENTICATEOR, A TRUSTED AGENT
AGENT, AND THE U.A.S. IS PERIODICALLY SENDING SIGNALS
TO IT TO DO THIS. THAT MAY BE TOO MUCH BAND
WIDTH, TOO MUCH -- MIGHT BE CUMBERSOME, SO THERE'S GOT TO
BE SOME SORT OF A DIFFERENT WAY OF DOING THIS
AUTHENTICATION. AND IT'S ACTUALLY -- IT'S
ACTUALLY AN ISSUE THAT'S BEEN FLAGGED, AND, AGAIN, NASA, I
GUESS THE FOLKS AT AIMS, THAT ARE LOOKING AT THE
INTRODUCTION OF U.A.S. IN LARGE NUMBERS INTO THE AIR
AIRSPACE FOR DOING ALL THESE INFRASTRUCTURE, SURVEILLANCE,
PACKAGE DELIVERY APPLICATIONS, THAT'S ACTUALLY ONE OF THE BIG
PROBLEMS THEY'RE LOOKING AT, AUTHENTICATION, HOW DO WE
AUTHENTICATE THAT A U.A.S. IS WHERE IT SAYS IT IS OR WHERE
IT SAYS IT SHOULD BE. SO, WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO
TRY TO STOP IT HERE. BUT THE SUMMARY, THE KEY
POINTS I WANTED TO GET ACROSS, ONE, THERE'S NO DOUBT THAT U.
U.A.S. ARE GOING TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF ALL KINDS OF
OPERATIONS RELATED TO TRAFFIC, INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT,
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND THINGS BEYOND.
CURRENTLY THERE ARE WAYS TO OPERATE THESE AIRCRAFT LEGALLY
LEGALLY, PROVIDED THEY'RE LESS THAN UNDER 55 POUNDS.
SO IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN OPERATING THEM, THERE IS A
LEGAL CHANNEL FOR DOING THAT. THE RULES THAT ARE COMING OUT
IN ABOUT 2016 ARE GOING TO MAKE IT EVEN EASIER, AND MORE
STREAMLINED. BUT EVEN THOUGH THE TECHNICAL,
THE REGULATORY ISSUES WILL BE ADDRESSED, THERE'S SOME ISSUES
THAT ARE GOING TO REMAIN. THE BEYOND LINE OF SIGHT
OPERATION, THE SENSE AND AVOID PROBLEM IS A BIG ONE, STILL BE
ONE THAT WE NEED TO DEAL WITH, AND THE ROBUSTNESS, THE GNSS
DENIAL, WE BECOME SO USED TO G.P.S., SO ADDICTED TO IT,
THAT EVERYTHING IS ACTUALLY DESIGNED AROUND IT, BUT,
HOWEVER, IT HAS SOME REALLY SHORTCOMINGS, IT'S EASY TO JAM
JAM, IT'S EASY TO INTERFERE WITH, AND IN PLACES WHERE YOU
COULD USE THESE U.A.S., IT'S NOT GOING TO BE AVAILABLE.
SO HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THE LACK OF ROBUSTNESS TO G.P.S.
AND DEAL WITH THAT ISSUE IN U. U.A.S.?
WITH THAT, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
, U.A.V. LAB HERE AT THE
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, ACTUALLY HAS QUITE A BIT OF
PEOPLE AND STUDENTS WORKING IN IT.
THERE ARE MANY MANY MORE I COULD LIST.
BUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO THEM. SPONSORS, WE'VE HAD DIFFERENT
SPONSORS AND THE LAST ONE IS MANY YEARS AGO, WHEN WE KICKED
OFF THIS PROJECT, WHEN WE STARTED WORKING WITH U.A.S.,
WE ACTUALLY GOT A SEED GRANT FROM MnDOT, SRF -- ACTUALLY,
I SHOULD SAY I ITS, NOT CTS, ITS ITS, THAT WORK WAS ACTUALLY
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT GOT US OFF THE GROUND.
WITH THAT, I'LL STOP, I'LL OPEN THE FLOOR TO QUESTIONS,
IF THERE ARE ANY.
>> JUST REMEMBER, YOU NEED A MIC.
>> SO, YOU MENTIONED AMAZON AND, OF COURSE, THEY'VE GOTTEN
A LOT OF MEDIA ATTENTION, AS HAVE OTHER COMMERCIAL
OPERATORS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN USING DRONES FOR DELIVERY
MECHANISMS. GIVEN THE NEW RULES THAT
YOU'RE EXPECTING IN 2016, IN PARTICULAR, THE LINE OF SIGHT
RULE, I'M INTERESTED IN YOUR PERSPECTIVES ON HOW LIKELY
THAT IS TO ACTUALLY HAPPEN IN THE NEAR FUTURE, IN THE
LONG-TERM FUTURE? I'M JUST INTERESTED IN YOUR
PERSPECTIVES ON IT. >> SO, WITH THE RULES IN 2016
ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THEM TO DO THOSE KIND OF THINGS.
HOWEVER, THIS PATHFINDER INITIATIVE THAT I TALKED ABOUT
ABOUT, AGAIN, IT'S A PROGRAM WHERE THE F.A.A. IS WORKING
WITH THREE DIFFERENT ENTITIES ENTITIES -- NN -- BNSF FOR THE
BEYOND LINE OF SIGHT OPERATIONS, CNN FOR OPERATING
AROUND CROWDS, AND THEN THERE'S A THIRD ONE, I'M
TRYING TO REMEMBER WHO IT WAS WAS -- BUT THEY'RE LOOKING AT
THE PROBLEM OF EXTENDED FAR DISTANCE OPERATIONS.
SO THE RULES ARE NOT GOING TO ADDRESS THE AMAZON QUESTION.
BUT THESE THREE ISSUES ARE THERE TO ADDRESS THOSE KIND OF
OPERATIONS. SO, I THINK IT'S STEP BY STEP
PROCEDURE. BUT THE RULES THAT ARE COMING
OUT IN 2016 ARE TO HELP PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO DO BRIDGE
INSPECTIONS, SMOKESTACK INSPECTIONS, THINGS LIKE THAT.
>> I'M JUST CURIOUS IF YOU, BEING INVOLVED IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE SYSTEMS, IS THERE ANY FEEDBACK FROM
DIFFERENT INDUSTRIES THAT RAISES CONCERN FOR THE RE
REPLACEMENT OF LABOR? SO YOU TALKED ABOUT YOUR
EXAMPLE OF THE RAIL INDUSTRY, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT'S A LOT OF
MAN HOURS PUT INTO INSPECTING ALL THOSE FEET OF TRACK, OR IS
THE ATTITUDE MORE SO THAT THESE SYSTEMS ARE GOING TO
ENHANCE PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY OF THE LABOR THAT'S
ALREADY IN PLACE AND IT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO CREATE, I
MEAN, KIND OF AN EXPERTISE IN THESE SYSTEMS?
>> OKAY. SO I CAN'T TALK DEFINITIVELY
ABOUT ALL OF THEM. I CAN TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT
THE ONE, WITH THE RAILROAD INSPECTION.
AND THAT ONE AT LEAST WHAT BNS BNSF IS SAYING IS THAT IT'S
GOING TO TEAM UP U.A.S. WITH INSPECTORS TO MAKE THE
INSPECTIONS MORE EFFICIENT. SO, I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WANT
TO READ INTO THAT AS TO WHETHER OR NOT IT'S GOING TO
BE A REPLACEMENT OF WORKERS OR IF IT'S GOING TO BE A FORCE
MULTIPLIER OF THEIR EFFORT. DON'T KNOW.
BUT AT LEAST, AGAIN, WITH THE RAILWAY INSPECTION, THAT'S THE
WAY IT'S BEING TOLD.
>> I'M VERY INTERESTED. SO, WHEN YOU WERE TALKING
ABOUT THE COORDINATED NAVIGATION SYSTEM, SO THE
SERIES OF DRONES THAT TALK TO EACH OTHER TO TRY AND CREATE
SOME ROBUSTNESS IN THE SYSTEM, ESPECIALLY IF THE G.P.S. WERE
TO CONK OUT, WITH THE RULES THAT ARE COMING UP, COULD ONE
PERSON HAVE LINE OF SIGHT IN YOUR INSTANCE OF, SAY, ALL
FIVE OF THOSE DRONES AND BE LEGAL OR WOULD YOU HAVE TO
HAVE FIVE SEPARATE OPERATORS, ONE WATCHING EACH OF THE
SYSTEMS YOU HAVE UP? >> I BELIEVE YOU COULD HAVE
ONE OPERATOR, IF THEY COULD SEE ALL OF THEM.
RIGHT? SO, IF THEY'RE
WITHIN -- I'M ALMOST -- WELL, I SHOULDN'T
SAY I'M 100% SURE, BUT I THINK THE WAY THEY ARE RIGHT NOW, IT
WOULD ALLOW YOU TO DO THAT, SINGLE OPERATOR.
AGAIN, THE WAY I'M THINKING ABOUT THIS, IF IT'S A SMALL
AREA, WHERE YOU COULD SEE THEM ALL, IT WOULD WORK.
BUT, AGAIN, DOWN THE ROAD, IF YOU COULD START DOING LINE OF
SIGHT, -- BEYOND LINE OF SIGHT OPERATIONS, IF THERE'S A WAY
TO COOPERATE, THERE'S SOMETHING TO BE GAINED.
BUT, AGAIN, IT'S NOT THE SILVER BULLET.
THERE'S ALL KINDS OF ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THAT AS WELL.
SO, I THINK THE SOLUTION FOR WORKING WITH GNSS-DENIED
OPERATIONS IS GOING TO BE DIFFERENT FOR DIFFERENT
APPLICATIONS. >> ARE THERE ANY EXAMPLES IN
OTHER COUNTRIES WHERE WE DON'T HAVE THE F.A.A. AND THE F.C.C.
F.C.C., OF THEM DOING THINGS THAT ARE EXCITING, INTERESTING
INTERESTING, DIFFERENT? >> THE ONE THAT -- I MEAN, I
KNOW A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON IN CANADA.
AND IT'S NOT TERRIBLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT'S GOING ON
HERE. SO THAT'S THE ONE I'M MORE
FAMILIAR WITH. I'M NOT SURE HOW -- AND, AGAIN
AGAIN, IN EUROPE, I KNOW THAT THEY ARE, FROM WHAT I
UNDERSTAND, THEY'RE NOT AT THE POINT OF ISSUING LIKE AN
EQUIVALENT TO THE NPRM, AT LEAST THAT'S WHAT SOMEONE WHO
IS KNOWLEDGEABLE IS TELLING ME ME, BUT THEY'RE GOING THERE,
THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE SOMETHING EQUIVALENT TO THAT.
I'M NOT SURE WHERE WE STAND COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE
WORLD. BUT MY IMPRESSION IS THAT WE
ARE ACTUALLY -- WE MAY BE A LITTLE BIT AHEAD.
BUT I'VE HEARD OTHERWISE. I DON'T KNOW -- I HAVEN'T SEEN
THE EVIDENCE THAT THAT'S THE CASE.
BUT, AGAIN, CANADA IS A LITTLE BIT SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'RE
DOING.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING TUGGING
AT THEM THAT THEY WANT TO ASK?
WELL, IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, THANK YOU.
PLEASE JOIN ME IN THANKING
NEXT WEEK, WE HAVE PROFESSOR DAVID NOYCE SPEAKING.
HE IS THE DEPARTMENT CHAIR FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING AT THE
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON.
AND HE'LL BE TALKING ABOUT A VARIETY OF ISSUES RELATED TO
MAPS AND ROAD CURVATURE, BEING ABLE TO IDENTIFY ROAD
CURVATURE IN ORDER TO DEVELOP SAFER SYSTEMS TO PREVENT
PEOPLE FROM DRIVING TOO QUICK QUICKLY AROUND CURVES.
SO, ANYWAY, HE'LL BE HERE NEXT WEEK, SAME TIME, SAME PLACE.
PROFESSOR DAVID NOYCE. HE HAS A LONG HISTORY OF WORK
WORKING ON VARIOUS SAFETY SYSTEMS, WITH TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AND OTHER ISSUES GOING BACK QUITE SOME TIME.