The last year

has seen the invention of a new four-letter word.

It starts with an M.

MOOC: massive open online courses.

Many organizations

are offering these online courses

to students all over the world, in the millions, for free.

Anybody who has an Internet connection

and the will to learn can access these great courses

from excellent universities

and get a credential at the end of it.

Now, in this discussion today,

I'm going to focus

on a different aspect of MOOCs.

We are taking what we are learning

and the technologies we are developing in the large

and applying them in the small

to create a blended model of education

to really reinvent and reimagine

what we do in the classroom.

Now, our classrooms could use change.

So, here's a classroom

at this little three-letter institute

in the Northeast of America, MIT.

And this was a classroom about 50 or 60 years ago,

and this is a classroom today.

What's changed?

The seats are in color.

Whoop-de-do.

Education really hasn't changed

in the past 500 years.

The last big innovation in education

was the printing press and the textbooks.

Everything else has changed around us.

You know, from healthcare to transportation,

everything is different, but education hasn't changed.

It's also been a real issue in terms of access.

So what you see here

is not a rock concert.

And the person you see at the end of the stage

is not Madonna.

This is a classroom

at the Obafemi Awolowo University in Nigeria.

Now, we've all heard of distance education,

but the students way in the back,

200 feet away from the instructor,

I think they are undergoing long-distance education.

Now, I really believe

that we can transform education,

both in quality and scale and access,

through technology.

For example, at edX,

we are trying to transform education

through online technologies.

Given education has been calcified for 500 years,

we really cannot think about reengineering it,

micromanaging it.

We really have to completely reimagine it.

It's like going from ox carts to the airplane.

Even the infrastructure has to change.

Everything has to change.

We need to go from lectures on the blackboard

to online exercises, online videos.

We have to go to interactive virtual laboratories

and gamification.

We have to go to completely online grading

and peer interaction and discussion boards.

Everything really has to change.

So at edX and a number of other organizations,

we are applying these technologies to education

through MOOCs to really increase access to education.

And you heard of this example,

where, when we launched our very first course --

and this was an MIT-hard

circuits and electronics course --

about a year and a half ago,

155,000 students from 162 countries

enrolled in this course.

And we had no marketing budget.

Now, 155,000 is a big number.

This number is bigger

than the total number of alumni of MIT

in its 150-year history.

7,200 students passed the course,

and this was a hard course.

7,200 is also a big number.

If I were to teach at MIT two semesters every year,

I would have to teach for 40 years

before I could teach this many students.

Now these large numbers

are just one part of the story.

So today, I want to discuss a different aspect,

the other side of MOOCs,

take a different perspective.

We are taking what we develop and learn in the large

and applying it in the small

to the classroom, to create a blended model of learning.

But before I go into that, let me tell you a story.

When my daughter turned 13, became a teenager,

she stopped speaking English,

and she began speaking this new language.

I call it teen-lish.

It's a digital language.

It's got two sounds: a grunt and a silence.

"Honey, come over for dinner."

"Hmm."

"Did you hear me?"

Silence. (Laughter)

"Can you listen to me?"

"Hmm."

So we had a real issue with communicating,

and we were just not communicating,

until one day I had this epiphany.

I texted her. (Laughter)

I got an instant response.

I said, no, that must have been by accident.

She must have thought, you know,

some friend of hers was calling her.

So I texted her again. Boom, another response.

I said, this is great.

And so since then, our life has changed.

I text her, she responds.

It's just been absolutely great.

(Applause)

So our millennial generation

is built differently.

Now, I'm older, and my youthful looks might belie that,

but I'm not in the millennial generation.

But our kids are really different.

The millennial generation is completely comfortable

with online technology.

So why are we fighting it in the classroom?

Let's not fight it. Let's embrace it.

In fact, I believe -- and I have two fat thumbs,

I can't text very well --

but I'm willing to bet that with evolution,

our kids and their grandchildren

will develop really, really little, itty-bitty thumbs

to text much better,

that evolution will fix all of that stuff.

But what if we embraced technology,

embraced the millennial generation's

natural predilections,

and really think about creating these online technologies,

blend them into their lives.

So here's what we can do.

So rather than driving our kids into a classroom,

herding them out there at 8 o'clock in the morning --

I hated going to class at 8 o'clock in the morning,

so why are we forcing our kids to do that?

So instead what you do

is you have them watch videos

and do interactive exercises

in the comfort of their dorm rooms, in their bedroom,

in the dining room, in the bathroom,

wherever they're most creative.

Then they come into the classroom

for some in-person interaction.

They can have discussions amongst themselves.

They can solve problems together.

They can work with the professor

and have the professor answer their questions.

In fact, with edX, when we were teaching our first course

on circuits and electronics around the world,

this was happening unbeknownst to us.

Two high school teachers

at the Sant High School in Mongolia

had flipped their classroom,

and they were using our video lectures

and interactive exercises,

where the learners in the high school,

15-year-olds, mind you,

would go and do these things in their own homes

and they would come into class,

and as you see from this image here,

they would interact with each other

and do some physical laboratory work.

And the only way we discovered this

was they wrote a blog

and we happened to stumble upon that blog.

We were also doing other pilots.

So we did a pilot experimental blended courses,

working with San Jose State University in California,

again, with the circuits and electronics course.

You'll hear that a lot. That course has become

sort of like our petri dish of learning.

So there, the students would, again,

the instructors flipped the classroom,

blended online and in person,

and the results were staggering.

Now don't take these results to the bank just yet.

Just wait a little bit longer as we experiment with this some more,

but the early results are incredible.

So traditionally, semester upon semester,

for the past several years, this course,

again, a hard course,

had a failure rate of about 40 to 41 percent

every semester.

With this blended class late last year,

the failure rate fell to nine percent.

So the results can be extremely, extremely good.

Now before we go too far into this,

I'd like to spend some time discussing

some key ideas.

What are some key ideas

that makes all of this work?

One idea is active learning.

The idea here is, rather than have students

walk into class and watch lectures,

we replace this with what we call lessons.

Lessons are interleaved sequences

of videos and interactive exercises.

So a student might watch a five-, seven-minute video

and follow that with an interactive exercise.

Think of this as the ultimate Socratization of education.

You teach by asking questions.

And this is a form of learning

called active learning,

and really promoted by a very early paper, in 1972,

by Craik and Lockhart,

where they said and discovered

that learning and retention really relates strongly

to the depth of mental processing.

Students learn much better

when they are interacting with the material.

The second idea is self-pacing.

Now, when I went to a lecture hall,

and if you were like me,

by the fifth minute I would lose the professor.

I wasn't all that smart, and I would be scrambling, taking notes,

and then I would lose the lecture for the rest of the hour.

Instead, wouldn't it be nice with online technologies,

we offer videos and interactive engagements to students?

They can hit the pause button.

They can rewind the professor.

Heck, they can even mute the professor.

So this form of self-pacing

can be very helpful to learning.

The third idea that we have is instant feedback.

With instant feedback,

the computer grades exercises.

I mean, how else do you teach 150,000 students?

Your computer is grading all the exercises.

And we've all submitted homeworks,

and your grades come back two weeks later,

you've forgotten all about it.

I don't think I've still received some of my homeworks

from my undergraduate days.

Some are never graded.

So with instant feedback,

students can try to apply answers.

If they get it wrong, they can get instant feedback.

They can try it again and try it again,

and this really becomes much more engaging.

They get the instant feedback,

and this little green check mark that you see here

is becoming somewhat of a cult symbol at edX.

Learners are telling us that they go to bed at night

dreaming of the green check mark.

In fact, one of our learners

who took the circuits course early last year,

he then went on to take a software course