REGULATIONS THEY FEEL ARE SEXIST AGAINST WOMEN BECAUSE THEY

SPECIFICALLY GO AFTER BDSM SCENES THAT INCLUDE WOMEN BEING

DOMINANT. THIS IS INTERESTING, IT WAS A STORY THAT WAS RELEASED

A FEW YEARS AGO ABOUT THE NEW REGULATIONS REGARDING PORN IN

THE U.K., AND THEY HAVE BANNED THINGS LIKE FEMALE EJACULATION

BUT NOT MALA DECORATION, FACE SITTING, CANING, ANOTHER RAUNCHY

THINGS THAT HAPPENED DURING BDSM SCENES, BUT IT SEEMS AS THOUGH

THESE REGULATIONS AGAIN ARE TARGETED SPECIFICALLY TOWARD

WOMEN AND NOT NECESSARILY THE MALE PORN ACTORS. A WOMAN IN THE

MIDDLE OF THIS CHAOS IS A PORN PRODUCER BY THE NAME OF PANDORA

BLAKE, SHE HAD A PORN SITE CALLED DREAMSOFSPANKING, WHERE

THERE WERE VIDEOS OF MEN BEING CANED, BECAUSE THAT'S THE TYPE

OF GENRE --

>>LET'S BE CLEAR, BECAUSE THEY DESERVED IT.

>>THEY WERE BAD, BAD BOYS.

>>THEY HAD IT COMING.

>>KEEP IN MIND, THESE ARE ADULT PORN ACTORS WHO HAVE CONSENTED

TO DOING THE SCENES, THIS IS A TYPE OF GENRE OR A TYPE OF

FETISH THAT LOTS OF PEOPLE OUT THERE ENJOY, AND ALSO, BOOKS

LIKE 50 SHADES OF GRAY WERE WILDLY POPULAR AND TURNED INTO

MOVIES, AND IDOLIZED BY ALL THE PEOPLE. BUT FOR SOME REASON

THINGS LIKE FEMALE EJACULATION AND FACE SITTING ARE

INAPPROPRIATE IN THE U.K.

>> BONDAGE IN WHICH ALL FOUR LIMBS ARE RESTRICTED AND

SPANKING,

WHIPPING, OR CANING THAT LEAVES SIGNIFICANT MARKS, ARE ALL

THINGS THAT ARE BANNED, AND APPARENTLY THESE WERE DEPICTED

IN SOME OF HER PORN SCENES.

>> AGAIN, FOCUSED HEAVILY ON WOMEN.

>>LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN. FIRST OF ALL, LET'S BE FAIR, THE

FEMALE EJACULATION, IN ORDER TO VIOLATE THE RULES, MUST BE DONE

ON ANOTHER'S BODY, OR CONSUMED.

>>WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN? ARE THEY TALKING SPECIFICALLY

ABOUT SQUIRTERS? WHY IS THAT UNACCEPTABLE WHEN YOU DO IT ON A

DUDE, BUT IN PORN DUDES ARE CUMMING ON WOMEN'S FACES

CONSTANTLY?

>>THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THAT. BUT I WAS GOOD TO SAY IS,

DONE ON ANOTHER PERSON'S BODY, YOU HAVE JUST DESCRIBED 99% OF

ALL PORN, WHAT MEN DO TO WOMEN. THAT IS NOT BANNED IN THE U.K.

THEY ARE LIKE, FEMALE EJACULATION, WE ARE NOT AGAINST

WOMEN ORGASMING, BUT IF YOU DO IT ON THE PERSON, THAT IS BAD.

THIS KIND OF BDSM IS PERVERSION OR DEGRADATION, THEY SAID.

AND HOSTILE IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE.

>>HERE IS ANOTHER THING THEY HAVE NOT BANNED IN THE U.K. --

I'M TRYING TO FIND PC WAYS OF SAYING THIS, I'M JUST GOING

TO SAY IT, WOMEN LITERALLY CHOKING ON MEN'S PENISES.

THAT IS OKAY.

>>THAT IS NOT DEGRADING.

>>BUT YOU CANE A MAN WHO WANTS IT AND THAT IS DEGRADING.

>>YOU MADE A WOMAN CUM AND SHE CAME ON A PART OF YOUR BODY,

THAT IS DEGRADING? WHY DID YOU MAKE THE WOMAN CUM, PERVERT? A

LOT OF THIS IS ABOUT THE SPANKING, THAT IS WHY I LOVE ONE

OF HER TITLES. "SLIGHT DAMAGE TO THE REAR END."

>>SHE IS A CLASSY BDSM PRODUCER.

>>IT IS ONLY SLIGHT DAMAGE. AND THAT GETS BANNED.

>>I HATE EVERY PART OF THESE U.K. REGULATIONS. REGULATIONS

SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE TO KEEP PEOPLE SAFE AND IN THIS CASE IT

IS NOT ABOUT KEEPING PEOPLE SAFE, THEY ARE TWO CONSENTING

ADULTS WHO WANT TO DO THESE PORN SCENES, LET THEM. THERE ARE LOTS

OF DEGRADING THINGS IN PORNOGRAPHY, RIGHT? YOU CAN'T

DRAW A LINE THAT ONLY IMPACTS FEMALES IN THE PORN INDUSTRY.

THAT IS INSANE.

>> THERE ARE CLEAR LINES THAT SHOULDN'T BE CROSSED. ANYTHING

NONCONSENSUAL, GONE. THAT INCLUDES BY DEFINITION ANYTHING

UNDER AGE, BECAUSE THAT IS MY LAW NONCONSENSUAL. THOSE ARE

OBVIOUS. YOU DON'T WANT TO DEPICT RAPE IN PORN, I THINK

THAT IS A FAIR LAW. YES YOU WILL HAVE SOME BOUNDARIES THERE AS TO

WHERE YOU DRAW THE LINE, BUT BDSM IS SO WITHIN THE MAINSTREAM

OF ACCEPTABLE FETISHES THAT, LIKE, IT IS LIKE THEY CAME OUT

OF THE 17TH CENTURY. THEY ARE LIKE, WHAT IS THIS THING CALLED

SLIGHT DAMAGE TO THE REAR END? A SPANKING ON YOUR BUTTOCKS? THIS

IS SO TAME, THAT IS NOT ANYWHERE NEAR THE LINE. NOW THERE IS AN

EXTRA BIT OF PERVERSION, IF YOU WILL, IN THIS LAW, THAT BY LAW

IN ENGLAND YOU CAN DO THIS BETWEEN CONSENTING ADULTS, YOU

JUST CAN'T DO IT ON TAPE NOW. BUT WHAT IS NORMALLY THE RULE IS

THAT YOU CAN'T A WOMAN TO HAVE SEX WITH HER, BECAUSE THAT IS

PROSTITUTION, BUT YOU COULD PAY TO HAVE SEX WITH HER ON CAMERA

BECAUSE THAT IS PORN. THEY HAVE FLIPPED THE IRONY, BOTH ARE

IRONIC, BUT IN THIS CASE THEY ARE LIKE YOU WANT TO DO IT IN

REAL LIFE, GO AHEAD, DO ANY DAMAGE YOU WANT TO YOUR REAR

END, BUT DON'T DO IT ON TAPE BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE ILLEGAL.

>>ALSO WHAT IS INTERESTING ABOUT THE U.K. WHICH THANKFULLY WE

DON'T HAVE IN THE U.S. YET IS A REGULAR TRADE BODY THAT IMPACTS

WHAT CAN BE PUT ON THE INTERNET. WE HAVE THE SEC THAT FOCUSES

PRIMARILY AND REALLY ONLY ON TV AND RADIO, THEY HAVEN'T VENTURED

INTO THE INTERNET YET. BUT IN THE U.K. THEY HAVE ALREADY

STARTED REGULATING WICKED PUTS ON THE INTERNET ESPECIALLY WITH

PORN. JUST LET IT GO. I THINK YOU GAVE CLEAR EXAMPLES OF WHAT

IS UNACCEPTABLE, BUT BDSM, IT IS WHAT IT IS. THEY ARE CONSENTING

ADULTS, THEY WANT -- THEY WANT THAT LIGHT DAMAGE TO THE REAR

END.