But the two are so radically different, how can they share the label of populism?

What does it mean to be populist?

Well, populism is the political belief that the underdog, hard working majority is undermined

and exploited by a small, elite minority. Populist politicians claim to represent the

interest of average or working class citizens, and work to unite the population against a common enemy.

For right-leaning politicians like Trump, that’s immigrants and the Republican establishment.

For leftist politicians like Sanders, it’s Wall Street, billionaires

and campaign finance laws.

Throughout history, populist ideas have often coincided with charismatic demagogues, as

these personality types are often successful at galvanizing the masses. In fact, one of

the earliest populists was Julius Caesar, who undermined Rome’s ruling aristocrats

by appealing to the underrepresented working class. But populism isn’t necessarily good or bad.

Both FDR and Adolph Hitler were decisively populist politicians, by appealing to the

frustrations of their respective countries.

Today, populist rhetoric is pervasive throughout the world. In Europe, it is generally more

popular on the ideological right, which believes that socialist or left-leaning policies negate the collective will of the people.

This was the idea behind the 2016 Brexit referendum,

as many working class Brits felt that globalization provided by EU membership was not to their benefit.

Similar populist sentiments have gained momentum throughout Europe in recent

years, leading some experts to predict a string of other similar referendums and, perhaps, the gradual disintegration of the EU.

In the US, however, populism is widespread. Liberal voters tend to resonate with issues

that affect the poor and working class, like income inequality. In fact, one of the most

recent notable American populist movements was 2011’s Occupy Wall Street,

which blamed corporations and the wealthiest one percent of Americans for creating economic instability for the rest of the country.

Conservatives like Trump, on the other hand, have used populist sentiments

to tap into voters’ frustrations with bureaucrats and general distrust of the federal government.

For instance, the Tea Party Movement formed in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis as a protest against government overreach.

So whether it be in the US or abroad, populist politicians tend to operate the same way.

That is, they choose a popular enemy, like the establishment, immigration or criminals,

and rally voters to get behind that cause. Oftentimes this has led to popular movements

and legal reforms. Other times it has cultivated in widespread ultra-nationalism and nativism.

Either way, populism is an extremely effective political tool.