Subtitles section Play video Print subtitles WAR WITHOUT GETTING CONGRESS ON BOARD. ONE OF ONLY THREE REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR IT REMARKABLY WAS MATT GAETZ OF FLORIDA WHO IS ONE OF THE PRESIDENT'S CLOSEST ALLIES. MAYBE THE SINGLE CLOSEST ALLIES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. HE JOINS US NOW. CONGRESSMAN, THANKS FOR COMING ON. I THINK IT'S FAIR TO SAY YOU ARE CERTAINLY ONE OF THE PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE CLOSEST TO THE PRESIDENT. HE IS COMPLETELY OPPOSED TO THIS. YOU, AS HIS CLOSE ALLY, VOTED FOR IT. TELL US WHY YOU DID THAT. >> I SPOKE TO THE PRESIDENT TODAY AFTER ONE OF AMERICA'S BRAVE PATRIOTS WAS LAID DOWN AT ARLINGTON. ONE OF MY CONSTITUENTS WHO PASSED AWAY JUST DAYS BEFORE CHRISTMAS IN AFGHANISTAN. THE PRESIDENT TOLD ME IS MORE ANTIWAR THAN I AM. AND I LOVE THE PRESIDENT FOR THAT, TUCKER. THE THING IS, YEAH, I THINK HE GOT A FEW OF THE ADVISORS OF THE PRESIDENT WHO ARE TRYING TO SLOW-WALK THE ADMINISTRATION INTO WAR. WHEN THE PRESIDENT RELIES ON HIS INSTINCTS AND WE HAVE THE TRUMP DOCTRINE, WE KILL THE TERRORIST AND WE COME HOME. AND I THINK THIS WAR POWERS RESOLUTION WAS WORTHY OF SUPPORT BECAUSE IT DID NOT CRITICIZE THE PRESIDENT. IT DID NOT SAY HE WAS WRONG IN KILLING SOLEIMANI. BUT HE DID -- IT DID SAY THAT IF ANY PRESIDENT WANTS TO DRAG OUR NATION INTO ANOTHER FOREVER MIDDLE EAST WAR THAT THEY REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS. THAT'S SOMETHING I DEEPLY BELIEVE. AND I THINK IT'S SOMETHING THE PRESIDENT DEEPLY BELIEVES. >> Tucker: SO WHY WOULDN'T -- I MEAN, FIRST OF ALL, I THINK THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES THAT. I THINK IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT IT DOES. BUT WHY WOULDN'T CONGRESS, IF THEY ARE SO IN FAVOR OF A MILITARY ACTION PUT THEMSELVES ON THE RECORD ENDORSING IT. IT SEEMS LIKE ONE OF THE REASONS PEOPLE OPPOSE THIS IS BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID. THEY ARE COWARDS IN THE CONGRESS. >> IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT I THINK WE HAVE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS THAT DEPART FROM WHAT THE FRAMERS AND FOUNDERS BELIEVED WOULD HAPPEN. THEY BELIEVE THAT WE WOULD CLOSELY GUARD OUR ARTICLE 1 POWERS AND THAT WE WOULD ENSURE THAT NO PRESIDENT WOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE THOSE AWAY IN ANY SORT OF AFFRONT TO WHAT WAS INTENDED FOR US TO BE OUR RESPONSIBILITY. IT'S MY BELIEF DECLARING WAR IS NON-DELIBLE DUTY FOR THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS. SUGGEST WE HAVE TO NOT DO OUR JOB SO THAT PEOPLE IN UNIFORM CAN DO THEIRS. WE CAN ACTUALLY DO BOTH, TUCKER. >> Tucker: JUST TO BE TOTALLY CLEAR, YOU ARE ONE OF THREE REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED IN EFFECT, AGAINST THE PRESIDENT'S STATED POSITION BUT YOU JUST TALKED TO THE PRESIDENT AND HE SAID THAT HE IS ON YOUR SIDE? >> WELL, THE PRESIDENT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE PREFERRED THAT I VOTE ABOUT WITH THE OTHER REPUBLICANS. HE CERTAINLY SAID THAT I THINK ON THESE BROADER QUESTIONS OF WAR AND PEACE, DONALD TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE PRO-WAR CANDIDATE LOSES PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. HILLARY CLINTON WAS MORE PRO-WAR AND LOST. AND IF YOU LOOK PREVIOUSLY, IT'S TYPICALLY THE ANTI-WAR CANDIDATES THAT WIN. I THINK SINCE 9/11 JOHN KERRY WAS THE ONLY ANTI-WAR CANDIDATE THAT LOST AN ELECTION. AND SO I THINK THAT THE PRESIDENT UNDERSTANDS THAT AND HE IS TOO SMART TO LET NANCY PELOSI TRY TO CAST HIM AS THE PRO-WAR CANDIDATE AND THAT'S WHY I DON'T THINK WE ARE GOING TO WAR WITH IRAN. >> Tucker: I THINK THAT'S A
B1 FoxNews war president tucker congress closest Gaetz explains why he voted with Dems on War Powers resolution 4 0 林宜悉 posted on 2020/02/08 More Share Save Report Video vocabulary