Only for a limited time. >>> AN ABUNDANCE OF EVIDENCE NOW

>>> AN ABUNDANCE OF EVIDENCE NOW SITS IN OUR FACES THAT PRESIDENT

SITS IN OUR FACES THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS BEEN TRADING AMERICAN

TRUMP HAS BEEN TRADING AMERICAN INTERESTS FOR HIS PERSONAL

INTERESTS FOR HIS PERSONAL INTERESTS.

INTERESTS. THE TEXT MESSAGES SHOW THAT THE

THE TEXT MESSAGES SHOW THAT THE WHOLE APPARATUS OF AMERICAN

WHOLE APPARATUS OF AMERICAN DIPLOMACY KNEW THE DEAL, TRUMP

DIPLOMACY KNEW THE DEAL, TRUMP WOULD DELIVER U.S. GOOD WILL IF

WOULD DELIVER U.S. GOOD WILL IF AND ONLY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT

AND ONLY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DELIVERED DIRT ON MIZ POLITICAL

DELIVERED DIRT ON MIZ POLITICAL ENEMIES.

ENEMIES. THE PRIME QUESTION NOW IS

THE PRIME QUESTION NOW IS WHETHER THE UNITED STATES

WHETHER THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS WILL PROCEED WITH ITS

CONGRESS WILL PROCEED WITH ITS DUTY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND

DUTY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND HOLD THIS PRESIDENT ACCOUNTABLE.

HOLD THIS PRESIDENT ACCOUNTABLE. THOSE OPPOSED TO A JUDGE WILL

THOSE OPPOSED TO A JUDGE WILL EXPLOET EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO

EXPLOET EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO DELAY AND ULTIMATELY PREVENT A

DELAY AND ULTIMATELY PREVENT A CONGRESSIONAL VERDICT ON ITS

CONGRESSIONAL VERDICT ON ITS CONDUCT.

CONDUCT. A GOAL OF SUCH DELAYS WOULD BE

A GOAL OF SUCH DELAYS WOULD BE NOT JUSTICE OR CONSTITUTIONAL

NOT JUSTICE OR CONSTITUTIONAL RULE BUT THEIR DENIAL.

RULE BUT THEIR DENIAL. KNOWING THIS SPEAKER PELOSI IS

KNOWING THIS SPEAKER PELOSI IS WISE TO KEEP THE FOCUS TIGHT ON

WISE TO KEEP THE FOCUS TIGHT ON THOSE PRESIDENTIAL ACTIVITIES

THOSE PRESIDENTIAL ACTIVITIES THAT CHEERILY REVEAL ABUSE OF

THAT CHEERILY REVEAL ABUSE OF POWER.

POWER. IF THERE IS A MEMBER OF CONGRESS

IF THERE IS A MEMBER OF CONGRESS THAT BELIEVES IT IS LEGITIMATE

THAT BELIEVES IT IS LEGITIMATE FOR A PRESIDENT TO DEMAND DIRT

FOR A PRESIDENT TO DEMAND DIRT ON A POLITICAL RIVAL, THAT

ON A POLITICAL RIVAL, THAT MEMBER OF CONGRESS SHOULD SAY SO

MEMBER OF CONGRESS SHOULD SAY SO BUT LET HIS OR HER COLLEAGUES

BUT LET HIS OR HER COLLEAGUES RENDER THEIR OWN JUDGMENT AS

RENDER THEIR OWN JUDGMENT AS WELL.

WELL. I’M CONFIDENT THAT FEW AMERICANS

I’M CONFIDENT THAT FEW AMERICANS THINK IT IS LEGITIMATE OR

THINK IT IS LEGITIMATE OR CONSTITUTIONAL FOR A PRESIDENT

CONSTITUTIONAL FOR A PRESIDENT TO SELL HIS INTEREST, U.S.

TO SELL HIS INTEREST, U.S. INTERESTS IN WHAT’S NOW BEEN

INTERESTS IN WHAT’S NOW BEEN CLEARLY DOCUMENTED AS A

CLEARLY DOCUMENTED AS A SLEAZILY, DESPERATE SEARCH FOR

SLEAZILY, DESPERATE SEARCH FOR ANYTHING THAT COULD FORCE PEOPLE

ANYTHING THAT COULD FORCE PEOPLE INTO VOTING FOR THE INCUMBENT

INTO VOTING FOR THE INCUMBENT PRESIDENT.

PRESIDENT. WHAT’S IMPORTANT NOW IS

WHAT’S IMPORTANT NOW IS COMMITTED ACTION.

COMMITTED ACTION. AND THE HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES