COURT WILL BE MEANINGLESS. SPEAK OF THE STAIN WILL ALWAYS

SPEAK OF THE STAIN WILL ALWAYS BE ON HIS PRESIDENCY.

BE ON HIS PRESIDENCY. >> Laura: CHUCK SCHUMER

>> Laura: CHUCK SCHUMER CALLING THE SENATE A KANGAROO

CALLING THE SENATE A KANGAROO COURT.

COURT. RIPPING UP PAPERS IN THE HOUSE

RIPPING UP PAPERS IN THE HOUSE AND THEN HE GOT THE KANGAROO

AND THEN HE GOT THE KANGAROO COURT IN THE SENATE.

COURT IN THE SENATE. NICE JOB.

NICE JOB. TRY TO ME NOW, LINDSEY GRAHAM,

TRY TO ME NOW, LINDSEY GRAHAM, CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY

CHAIRMAN OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.

COMMITTEE. SENATOR, THIS IS NOT A TRUE

SENATOR, THIS IS NOT A TRUE ACQUITTAL, THEY ARE SAYING.

ACQUITTAL, THEY ARE SAYING. >> ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT

>> ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT SENATOR SCHUMER AND NANCY PELOSI

SENATOR SCHUMER AND NANCY PELOSI ARE NO LONGER IN CHARGE OF THIS.

ARE NO LONGER IN CHARGE OF THIS. WHY DID SHE TEAR UP THE SPEECH,

WHY DID SHE TEAR UP THE SPEECH, AND NANCY PELOSI CUSTOMER WHO

AND NANCY PELOSI CUSTOMER WHO WAS HER AUDIENCE?

WAS HER AUDIENCE? IT WAS THE SQUAD.

IT WAS THE SQUAD. SHE’S LOST CONTROL OF THE HOUSE,

SHE’S LOST CONTROL OF THE HOUSE, SENATOR SCHUMER IS GOING TO GET

SENATOR SCHUMER IS GOING TO GET PRIMARY BY AOC.

PRIMARY BY AOC. THE PEOPLE WE USED TO WORK WITH,

THE PEOPLE WE USED TO WORK WITH, THEY’VE LOST THEIR MIND WHEN IT

THEY’VE LOST THEIR MIND WHEN IT COMES TO TRUMP.

COMES TO TRUMP. THE PRESIDENT WAS ACQUITTED,

THE PRESIDENT WAS ACQUITTED, THIS WAS A RIDICULOUS ACCUSATION

THIS WAS A RIDICULOUS ACCUSATION AGAINST THE PRESIDENCY ITSELF

AGAINST THE PRESIDENCY ITSELF AND OUR COLLEAGUES VOTED FOR A

AND OUR COLLEAGUES VOTED FOR A KID CONVICTION.

KID CONVICTION. I THINK YOU PUT THE PRESIDENCY

I THINK YOU PUT THE PRESIDENCY AT RISK.

AT RISK. I DON’T QUESTION YOUR MOTIVES

I DON’T QUESTION YOUR MOTIVES BUT I SURE QUESTION YOUR

BUT I SURE QUESTION YOUR JUDGMENT.

JUDGMENT. >> Laura: YOU THINK

>> Laura: YOU THINK MITT ROMNEY IS REPRESENTING HIS

MITT ROMNEY IS REPRESENTING HIS PEOPLE?

PEOPLE? 70% OF PEOPLE IN HIS STATE IN

70% OF PEOPLE IN HIS STATE IN FAVOR HIS ACTION.

FAVOR HIS ACTION. >> HE VOTED NOT GUILTY ON THE

>> HE VOTED NOT GUILTY ON THE PROCESS ARGUMENT, OBSTRUCTION OF

PROCESS ARGUMENT, OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS.

CONGRESS. THEY IMPEACHED THE PRESIDENT FOR

THEY IMPEACHED THE PRESIDENT FOR DARING TO GO TO COURT, THEY

DARING TO GO TO COURT, THEY IMPEACHED THE PRESIDENT WITH 78

IMPEACHED THE PRESIDENT WITH 78 DAYS, HE NEVER GOT A CALL A

DAYS, HE NEVER GOT A CALL A WITNESS, NEVER GOT A CROSS

WITNESS, NEVER GOT A CROSS EXAMINE ANYBODY.

EXAMINE ANYBODY. YOU COULDN’T GET A PARKING

YOU COULDN’T GET A PARKING TICKET BASED ON THE PROCESS THEY

TICKET BASED ON THE PROCESS THEY USED.

USED. HERE’S ABUSE OF POWER, THEY’RE

HERE’S ABUSE OF POWER, THEY’RE GOING TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT OF

GOING TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE HE

THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE HE SUSPENDED MILITARY AID TO THE

SUSPENDED MILITARY AID TO THE UKRAINE FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF

UKRAINE FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME TO LEVERAGE AN

TIME TO LEVERAGE AN INVESTIGATION THAT NEVER

INVESTIGATION THAT NEVER OCCURRED.

OCCURRED. THEY GOT THE MONEY AND THERE WAS

THEY GOT THE MONEY AND THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION, AND THEY WERE

NO INVESTIGATION, AND THEY WERE GOING TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT

GOING TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT BASED ON THAT, THAT IS

BASED ON THAT, THAT IS RIDICULOUS.

RIDICULOUS. >> Laura: "THE FEDERALIST"

>> Laura: "THE FEDERALIST" REPORTED THAT A TOP ROMNEY

REPORTED THAT A TOP ROMNEY ADVISOR SERVED ON THE BOARD OF

ADVISOR SERVED ON THE BOARD OF BURISMA WITH HUNTER BIDEN.

BURISMA WITH HUNTER BIDEN. HE JOINED BURISMA’S BOARD OF

HE JOINED BURISMA’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHILE HUNTER WAS ALSO

DIRECTORS WHILE HUNTER WAS ALSO SERVING ON THE BOARD.

SERVING ON THE BOARD. CUTE LITTLE COINCIDENCE, DON’T

CUTE LITTLE COINCIDENCE, DON’T YOU THINK?

YOU THINK? >> I’M NOT GOING TO SAY THAT

>> I’M NOT GOING TO SAY THAT THAT BOAT IS SINKING.

THAT BOAT IS SINKING. >> Laura: ISN’T THAT SWAMPY?

>> Laura: ISN’T THAT SWAMPY? >> ALL I CAN SAY IS WE ARE GOING

>> ALL I CAN SAY IS WE ARE GOING TO LOOK AT HUNTER BIDEN.

TO LOOK AT HUNTER BIDEN. WE ARE NOT GOING TO LIVE IN A

WE ARE NOT GOING TO LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE YOU TAKE A WRECKING

WORLD WHERE YOU TAKE A WRECKING BALL TO THE TRUMP FAMILY AND YOU

BALL TO THE TRUMP FAMILY AND YOU CAN’T ASK HUNTER BIDEN, BY THE

CAN’T ASK HUNTER BIDEN, BY THE WAY, THE FOREIGN RELATIONS

WAY, THE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE WILL, I HOPE, THEY

COMMITTEE WILL, I HOPE, THEY SHOULD.

SHOULD. JIM RISCH, IF YOU LISTEN, YOU

JIM RISCH, IF YOU LISTEN, YOU NEED TO ASK JOHN KERRY’S CHIEF

NEED TO ASK JOHN KERRY’S CHIEF OF STAFF, WHAT DID YOU DO ABOUT

OF STAFF, WHAT DID YOU DO ABOUT THE EMAIL WHEN YOU WERE TOLD

THE EMAIL WHEN YOU WERE TOLD THERE WAS A CONFLICT OF

THERE WAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

INTEREST? I’M GOING TO CALL EVERYBODY WHO

I’M GOING TO CALL EVERYBODY WHO SIGNED THE FISA WARRANT, I HOPE

SIGNED THE FISA WARRANT, I HOPE RACHEL BYRD WILL TELL US WHO THE

RACHEL BYRD WILL TELL US WHO THE WHISTLE-BLOWER IS AND WAS THE

WHISTLE-BLOWER IS AND WAS THE WHISTLE-BLOWER WORKING WITH

WHISTLE-BLOWER WORKING WITH POLITICAL OPERATIVES ON SCHIFF’S

POLITICAL OPERATIVES ON SCHIFF’S STAFF CUSTOMER AND I DON’T KNOW,

STAFF CUSTOMER AND I DON’T KNOW, WE WILL LOOK.

WE WILL LOOK. IF HAND REPUBLICAN HAD DONE THIS

IF HAND REPUBLICAN HAD DONE THIS THEY WOULD BE LOOKING AT US.

THEY WOULD BE LOOKING AT US. >> Laura: HOW ABOUT THE IG?

>> Laura: HOW ABOUT THE IG? >> I WANT TO KNOW WHO WAS THE

>> I WANT TO KNOW WHO WAS THE WHISTLE-BLOWER, WHAT WAS THEIR

WHISTLE-BLOWER, WHAT WAS THEIR MOTIVATION, DID THEY HAVE A

MOTIVATION, DID THEY HAVE A POLITICAL BIAS, WERE THEY

POLITICAL BIAS, WERE THEY WORKING WITH PEOPLE WHO WANTED

WORKING WITH PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO TAKE TRUMP DOWN EARLY ON HIS

TO TAKE TRUMP DOWN EARLY ON HIS PRESIDENCY.

PRESIDENCY. >> Laura: ARE YOU GOING TO

>> Laura: ARE YOU GOING TO CALL THE WHISTLE-BLOWER CUSTOMER

CALL THE WHISTLE-BLOWER CUSTOMER >> I HOPE SO.

>> I HOPE SO. >> Laura: JUST EXPLAINED THAT

>> Laura: JUST EXPLAINED THAT TO OUR VIEWERS, WHY CAN’T YOU

TO OUR VIEWERS, WHY CAN’T YOU CALL IT THE JUDICIARY?

CALL IT THE JUDICIARY? >> THERE ARE COMMITTEES, I HAVE

>> THERE ARE COMMITTEES, I HAVE JURISDICTION OF THE DEPARTMENT

JURISDICTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE FBI AND WE

OF JUSTICE AND THE FBI AND WE WILL CALL EVERYBODY WHO SIGNED

WILL CALL EVERYBODY WHO SIGNED THE FISA WARRANT.

THE FISA WARRANT. HOW DID THE STATE DEPARTMENT

HOW DID THE STATE DEPARTMENT IGNORE HUNTER BIDEN’S CONFLICT

IGNORE HUNTER BIDEN’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND THINK ABOUT IT,

OF INTEREST AND THINK ABOUT IT, WHEN JOE BIDEN WAS TALKING TO

WHEN JOE BIDEN WAS TALKING TO THE PARLIAMENT OF THE UKRAINE,

THE PARLIAMENT OF THE UKRAINE, YOU NEED TO END SWEETHEART

YOU NEED TO END SWEETHEART DEALS.

DEALS. DON’T YOU THINK THEY WERE

DON’T YOU THINK THEY WERE LAUGHING AT HIM CUSTOMER ASKED

LAUGHING AT HIM CUSTOMER ASKED ME WHEN WHAT IS HAPPENING IN

ME WHEN WHAT IS HAPPENING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE ON MONDAY?

NEW HAMPSHIRE ON MONDAY? THE DEMOCRATS ROLLING INTO THIS

THE DEMOCRATS ROLLING INTO THIS WHOLE PRIMARY PROCESS AFTER THE

WHOLE PRIMARY PROCESS AFTER THE DEBACLE IN THE BUYING AND NOW

DEBACLE IN THE BUYING AND NOW WHAT?

WHAT? >> I DIDN’T DO VERY WELL IN

>> I DIDN’T DO VERY WELL IN NEW HAMPSHIRE SO I’M NOT THE GUY

NEW HAMPSHIRE SO I’M NOT THE GUY TO ASK BUT SOUTH CAROLINA,

TO ASK BUT SOUTH CAROLINA, JOE BIDEN WILL WIN THE

JOE BIDEN WILL WIN THE SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY.

SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY. 70% OF THE VOTERS WILL BE

70% OF THE VOTERS WILL BE AFRICAN-AMERICAN.

AFRICAN-AMERICAN. HE IS WELL RESPECTED.

HE IS WELL RESPECTED. A SOCIALIST WILL NOT WIN A

A SOCIALIST WILL NOT WIN A SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY.

SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY. MAYOR PETE PULLED OFF HER PRETTY

MAYOR PETE PULLED OFF HER PRETTY STUNNING THING IN IOWA.

STUNNING THING IN IOWA. YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE THREE

YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE THREE DIFFERENT WINNERS IN THE FIRST

DIFFERENT WINNERS IN THE FIRST THREE PRIMARIES.

THREE PRIMARIES. IMPEACHMENT IS BEHIND US, THE

IMPEACHMENT IS BEHIND US, THE PRESIDENT IS STRONGER TODAY THAN

PRESIDENT IS STRONGER TODAY THAN BEFORE IMPEACHMENT, THE AMERICAN

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE THIS IS WHAT IT WAS.

PEOPLE SEE THIS IS WHAT IT WAS. AMENDED UP BY PEOPLE WHO CAN’T

AMENDED UP BY PEOPLE WHO CAN’T ACCEPT THAT HE WON.

ACCEPT THAT HE WON. THE GOING TO CALL BOLTON, THEY

THE GOING TO CALL BOLTON, THEY ARE GOING TO TRY TO DO SOMETHING

ARE GOING TO TRY TO DO SOMETHING BETWEEN NOW AND THE ELECTION

BETWEEN NOW AND THE ELECTION BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN’T

BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN’T BEAT HIM.

BEAT HIM. THE REASON SHE TORE THE SPEECH

THE REASON SHE TORE THE SPEECH UP IS BECAUSE THEY HATE THE

UP IS BECAUSE THEY HATE THE SPEECH.

SPEECH. BUT HERE’S THE GOOD NEWS, YOU

BUT HERE’S THE GOOD NEWS, YOU CAN TEAR THE SPEECH UP AT THE

CAN TEAR THE SPEECH UP AT THE RESULT OF THE SPEECH SPEAK FOR

RESULT OF THE SPEECH SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

THEMSELVES. >> Laura: IT IS SO GREAT TO

>> Laura: IT IS SO GREAT TO SEE YOU.

SEE YOU. I KNOW WE DON’T LIKE TO KEEP YOU