Subtitles section Play video Print subtitles CONTINUE TO COME AT IT FROM DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS, BUT I DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS, BUT I DON’T HAVE ANY DOUBT ABOUT THE DON’T HAVE ANY DOUBT ABOUT THE SINCERITY OF THE GOALS. SINCERITY OF THE GOALS. >> IN TERMS OF SENATOR >> IN TERMS OF SENATOR SANDERS -- SANDERS -- >> UH-HUH. >> UH-HUH. >> -- HE SAID THIS WEEK THAT >> -- HE SAID THIS WEEK THAT HE’S SPOKEN YOU IN THE LAST FEW HE’S SPOKEN YOU IN THE LAST FEW DAYS. DAYS. >> HE HAS. >> HE HAS. >> SO THAT ONE’S ACCURATE. >> SO THAT ONE’S ACCURATE. >> UH-HUH. >> UH-HUH. THAT’S RIGHT. THAT’S RIGHT. >> THAT’S GOOD. >> THAT’S GOOD. WHAT’S YOUR RELATIONSHIP LIKE WHAT’S YOUR RELATIONSHIP LIKE WITH SENATOR SANDERS? WITH SENATOR SANDERS? YOU OBVIOUSLY SHARE A LOT OF YOU OBVIOUSLY SHARE A LOT OF IMPORTANT POLICY GOALS, BUT SOME IMPORTANT POLICY GOALS, BUT SOME DIFFERENCES AND YOU’VE BEEN DIFFERENCES AND YOU’VE BEEN COMPETITORS OVER THESE LAST FEW COMPETITORS OVER THESE LAST FEW MONTHS. MONTHS. >> YEAH. >> YEAH. >> WHAT’S YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH >> WHAT’S YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM? HIM? >> SO, BERNIE AND I HAVE BEEN >> SO, BERNIE AND I HAVE BEEN FRIENDS FOR LONG, LONG TIME FRIENDS FOR LONG, LONG TIME DATING BACK WAY BEFORE I EVER DATING BACK WAY BEFORE I EVER GOT INVOLVED IN POLITICS, AND GOT INVOLVED IN POLITICS, AND THROUGH THE HOUSING CRASH, IN THROUGH THE HOUSING CRASH, IN PARTICULAR, KIND OF HERE WERE PARTICULAR, KIND OF HERE WERE CENTRAL ISSUES WE WERE WORKING CENTRAL ISSUES WE WERE WORKING ON. ON. I CAME UP -- IN FACT, THE FIRST I CAME UP -- IN FACT, THE FIRST TOWN HALLS I’VE EVER DONE WERE TOWN HALLS I’VE EVER DONE WERE IN VERMONT, WERE FOR BERNIE IN VERMONT, WERE FOR BERNIE SANDERS. SANDERS. >> WOW. >> WOW. >> AND BRUCE DROVE ME UP ON A >> AND BRUCE DROVE ME UP ON A SATURDAY AND WE DID A COUPLE OF SATURDAY AND WE DID A COUPLE OF TOWN HALLS, AND, BUT IT’S A SET TOWN HALLS, AND, BUT IT’S A SET OF ISSUES WE’VE WORKED ON, BOTH OF ISSUES WE’VE WORKED ON, BOTH OF US, FOR A VERY, VERY LONG OF US, FOR A VERY, VERY LONG TIME. TIME. >> THAT’S -- >> THAT’S -- >> I RESPECT THAT. >> I RESPECT THAT. >> THAT IS USUALLY GROUNDS FOR >> THAT IS USUALLY GROUNDS FOR MUTUAL TRUST OR AT LEAST MUTUAL MUTUAL TRUST OR AT LEAST MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING WHEN YOU’VE HAD A UNDERSTANDING WHEN YOU’VE HAD A RELATIONSHIP LIKE THAT. RELATIONSHIP LIKE THAT. >> I SURE HOPE SO. >> I SURE HOPE SO. YEAH. YEAH. UH-HUH. UH-HUH. >> ONE OF THE REASONS I WANTED >> ONE OF THE REASONS I WANTED TO ASK YOU ABOUT THAT TO ASK YOU ABOUT THAT RELATIONSHIP WITH SENATOR RELATIONSHIP WITH SENATOR SANDERS IS SOMETHING I TALKED TO SANDERS IS SOMETHING I TALKED TO HIM ABOUT LAST NIGHT WHEN I WAS HIM ABOUT LAST NIGHT WHEN I WAS IN VERMONT AND THAT IS THERE IN VERMONT AND THAT IS THERE HAVE BEEN SOME REALLY UNTOWARD HAVE BEEN SOME REALLY UNTOWARD ATTACKS BY SENATOR SANDERS’ ATTACKS BY SENATOR SANDERS’ SUPPORTERS, NOT BY HIM, HIMSELF, SUPPORTERS, NOT BY HIM, HIMSELF, AGAINST YOU, PARTICULARLY AGAINST YOU, PARTICULARLY ONLINE. ONLINE. HIS SUPPORTERS HAVE CALLED YOU A HIS SUPPORTERS HAVE CALLED YOU A SNAKE. SNAKE. THEY USED THE SNAKE EMOJI FOR THEY USED THE SNAKE EMOJI FOR YOU. YOU. THEY’VE CALLED YOU A TRAITOR. THEY’VE CALLED YOU A TRAITOR. THEY TRIED TO ORGANIZE SOMEBODY THEY TRIED TO ORGANIZE SOMEBODY TO PRIMARY YOU TO FORCE YOU OUT TO PRIMARY YOU TO FORCE YOU OUT OF YOUR SENATE SEAT HERE IN OF YOUR SENATE SEAT HERE IN MASSACHUSETTS. MASSACHUSETTS. AND THE SENATOR SAID LAST NIGHT, AND THE SENATOR SAID LAST NIGHT, HE RESPONDED, HE SAID, "I HE RESPONDED, HE SAID, "I CONDEMNED THAT." CONDEMNED THAT." AND HE’S DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM AND HE’S DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM WHAT HIS SUPPORTERS HAVE DONE. WHAT HIS SUPPORTERS HAVE DONE. I WANTED TO ASK IF -- IF THAT I WANTED TO ASK IF -- IF THAT ROSE TO YOUR LEVEL OF ROSE TO YOUR LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS, IF YOU WERE AWARE CONSCIOUSNESS, IF YOU WERE AWARE THAT WAS GOING ON, IF YOU HAVE THAT WAS GOING ON, IF YOU HAVE ANY REACTION TO THAT OR TO HIS ANY REACTION TO THAT OR TO HIS COMMENTS ABOUT IT LAST NIGHT. COMMENTS ABOUT IT LAST NIGHT. >> YOU KNOW, IT’S -- IT’S NOT >> YOU KNOW, IT’S -- IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT ME. JUST ABOUT ME. I THINK THERE’S A REAL PROBLEM I THINK THERE’S A REAL PROBLEM WITH THIS ONLINE BULLYING AND WITH THIS ONLINE BULLYING AND SORT OF ORGANIZED NASTINESS, AND SORT OF ORGANIZED NASTINESS, AND I’M NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT WHO I’M NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT WHO SAID MEAN THINGS. SAID MEAN THINGS. I’M TALKING ABOUT SOME REALLY I’M TALKING ABOUT SOME REALLY UGLY STUFF THAT WENT ON. UGLY STUFF THAT WENT ON. YOU KNOW, IN THE -- OUT IN YOU KNOW, IN THE -- OUT IN NEVADA WHEN THE UNITE HERE HAD NEVADA WHEN THE UNITE HERE HAD PUT OUT AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUT OUT AN ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENT CANDIDATES AND THEIR DIFFERENT CANDIDATES AND THEIR VIEWS ON HEALTH CARE AND OTHER VIEWS ON HEALTH CARE AND OTHER ISSUES AND SOME OF THE BERNIE ISSUES AND SOME OF THE BERNIE SUPPORTERS ONLINE TOOK EXCEPTION SUPPORTERS ONLINE TOOK EXCEPTION TO IT AND THEY DIDN’T JUST TAKE TO IT AND THEY DIDN’T JUST TAKE EXCEPTION THAT WE DISAGREE, YOU EXCEPTION THAT WE DISAGREE, YOU KNOW, OUTRAGEOUS TOWAY TO DO THI KNOW, OUTRAGEOUS TOWAY TO DO THI WHICH ANYBODY CAN DO, THAT’S WHICH ANYBODY CAN DO, THAT’S FINE. FINE. YOU CAN BE CLEVER AND CAN FIND YOU CAN BE CLEVER AND CAN FIND CLEVER WAYS TO BE KIND OF MEAN CLEVER WAYS TO BE KIND OF MEAN SOMETIMES. SOMETIMES. OKAY. OKAY. I GET THAT PART, TOO. I GET THAT PART, TOO. BUT THEY ACTUALLY PUBLISHED THE BUT THEY ACTUALLY PUBLISHED THE PHONE NUMBERS AND HOME ADDRESSES PHONE NUMBERS AND HOME ADDRESSES OF THE TWO WOMEN, THE EXECUTIVE OF THE TWO WOMEN, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND THE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR AND THE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR, WOMEN OF COLOR, DIRECTOR, WOMEN OF COLOR, IMMIGRANT WOMEN, AND REALLY PUT IMMIGRANT WOMEN, AND REALLY PUT THEM IN FEAR FOR THEIR FAMILIES, THEM IN FEAR FOR THEIR FAMILIES, OF -- THEY -- THESE ARE -- THESE OF -- THEY -- THESE ARE -- THESE ARE NOT, YOU KNOW, THESE ARE ARE NOT, YOU KNOW, THESE ARE TOUGH WOMEN. TOUGH WOMEN. TOUGH WOMEN WHO’VE RUN LABOR TOUGH WOMEN WHO’VE RUN LABOR ORGANIZING CAMPAIGNS AND REALLY ORGANIZING CAMPAIGNS AND REALLY EARNED THEIR JOBS IN THEIR EARNED THEIR JOBS IN THEIR UNION, I MEAN, THE HARD WAY. UNION, I MEAN, THE HARD WAY. AND, YET, SAID FOR THE FIRST AND, YET, SAID FOR THE FIRST TIME BECAUSE OF THIS ONSLAUGHT TIME BECAUSE OF THIS ONSLAUGHT OF ONLINE THREATS THAT THEY FELT OF ONLINE THREATS THAT THEY FELT REALLY UNDER ATTACK AND -- AND REALLY UNDER ATTACK AND -- AND THAT WASN’T THE FIRST TIME IT THAT WASN’T THE FIRST TIME IT HAPPENED. HAPPENED. WORKING FAMILIES PARTY, TWO WORKING FAMILIES PARTY, TWO WOMEN THERE, WOMEN OF COLOR, WHO WOMEN THERE, WOMEN OF COLOR, WHO WERE ATTACKED RIGHT AFTER THEY WERE ATTACKED RIGHT AFTER THEY ENDORSED ME. ENDORSED ME. AND I THINK THIS FUNDAMENTAL AND I THINK THIS FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION ABOUT WHAT GOES ON QUESTION ABOUT WHAT GOES ON ONLINE AND WHERE THOSE LINES ARE ONLINE AND WHERE THOSE LINES ARE AND HOW MUCH EACH OF US -- AND I AND HOW MUCH EACH OF US -- AND I WANT TO SAY THIS FOR ALL OF THE WANT TO SAY THIS FOR ALL OF THE CANDIDATES, BACK WHEN THERE WERE CANDIDATES, BACK WHEN THERE WERE LOTS OF US -- WE ARE RESPONSIBLE LOTS OF US -- WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PEOPLE WHO CLAIM TO BE FOR THE PEOPLE WHO CLAIM TO BE OUR SUPPORTERS AND DO REALLY OUR SUPPORTERS AND DO REALLY THREATEN, UGLY, DANGEROUS THINGS THREATEN, UGLY, DANGEROUS THINGS TO OTHER CANDIDATES. TO OTHER CANDIDATES. >> AND IT’S A PARTICULARLY -- >> AND IT’S A PARTICULARLY -- IT’S A PARTICULAR PROBLEM WITH IT’S A PARTICULAR PROBLEM WITH SANDERS’ SUPPORTERS. SANDERS’ SUPPORTERS. >> IT IS. >> IT IS. IT JUST IS. IT JUST IS. JUST A FACTUAL QUESTION. JUST A FACTUAL QUESTION. AND IT IS. AND IT IS. AND THAT’S SOMETHING I THINK AND THAT’S SOMETHING I THINK THAT -- THAT -- THAT -- THAT -- >> HAVE YOU EVER TALKED WITH >> HAVE YOU EVER TALKED WITH SENATOR SANDERS ABOUT THAT? SENATOR SANDERS ABOUT THAT? >> I HAVE. >> I HAVE. >> WHAT WAS THAT CONVERSATION >> WHAT WAS THAT CONVERSATION LIKE? LIKE? >> IT WAS SHORT, BUT, YEAH, >> IT WAS SHORT, BUT, YEAH, WE’VE TALKED ABOUT IT. WE’VE TALKED ABOUT IT. BUT I THINK IT’S A REAL PROBLEM. BUT I THINK IT’S A REAL PROBLEM. >> DOES HE NOT SHARE YOUR VIEW >> DOES HE NOT SHARE YOUR VIEW THAT HE’S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE THAT HE’S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BEHAVIOR OF HIS SUPPORTERS? BEHAVIOR OF HIS SUPPORTERS? >> YOU KNOW, I SHOULDN’T SPEAK >> YOU KNOW, I SHOULDN’T SPEAK FOR HIM. FOR HIM. IT’S SOMETHING HE SHOULD SPEAK IT’S SOMETHING HE SHOULD SPEAK FOR HIMSELF ON, BUT I DO THINK FOR HIMSELF ON, BUT I DO THINK IT’S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO IT’S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO RECKON WITH IN OUR POLITICAL RECKON WITH IN OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE, IN PARTICULAR, DISCOURSE, IN PARTICULAR, BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT POLITICS IS BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT POLITICS IS ABOUT IS TO GET OUT AND PUT YOUR ABOUT IS TO GET OUT AND PUT YOUR IDEAS OUT THERE. IDEAS OUT THERE. PEOPLE CHOOSE SIDES. PEOPLE CHOOSE SIDES. PEOPLE VOTE. PEOPLE VOTE. PEOPLE SAY, I’M HOLDING A SIGN PEOPLE SAY, I’M HOLDING A SIGN FOR HER, I’M HOLDING A SIGN FOR FOR HER, I’M HOLDING A SIGN FOR HIM. HIM. THAT IS PART OF WHAT WE DO, BUT THAT IS PART OF WHAT WE DO, BUT WHAT UNDERLIES THAT IS A WHAT UNDERLIES THAT IS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN DECENCY AND FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN DECENCY AND RESPECT FER OOCHOR EACH OTHER AN RESPECT FER OOCHOR EACH OTHER AN UNDERSTANDING THAT NOBODY TRIES UNDERSTANDING THAT NOBODY TRIES TO PUT SOMEBODY’S FAMILY AT RISK TO PUT SOMEBODY’S FAMILY AT RISK OR SOMEBODY PERSONALLY AT RISK OR SOMEBODY PERSONALLY AT RISK BECAUSE THEY DISAGREE WITH YOU BECAUSE THEY DISAGREE WITH YOU ON THE POLITICS OF IT, BECAUSE ON THE POLITICS OF IT, BECAUSE THEY SEE THE POLICY DIFFERENT, THEY SEE THE POLICY DIFFERENT, BECAUSE THEY DON’T SUPPORT YOUR BECAUSE THEY DON’T SUPPORT YOUR CANDIDATE AND THEY SUPPORT SOME CANDIDATE AND THEY SUPPORT SOME OTHER CANDIDATE. OTHER CANDIDATE. NO. NO. AND IF WE FOLLOW THAT SAME KIND AND IF WE FOLLOW THAT SAME KIND OF POLITICS AND DIVISION THAT OF POLITICS AND DIVISION THAT DONALD TRUMP FOLLOWS, THAT DONALD TRUMP FOLLOWS, THAT NOTION OF -- HE DRAWS STRENGTH NOTION OF -- HE DRAWS STRENGTH FROM TEARING PEOPLE APART, FROM FROM TEARING PEOPLE APART, FROM DEMONIZING PEOPLE, FROM SAYING, DEMONIZING PEOPLE, FROM SAYING, OH, THOSE ARE BAD PEOPLE AND OH, THOSE ARE BAD PEOPLE AND THAT’S -- THAT’S KIND OF HOW THAT’S -- THAT’S KIND OF HOW THEY DRAW THEIR STRENGTH. THEY DRAW THEIR STRENGTH. IT’S NOT WHO I WANT TO BE AS A IT’S NOT WHO I WANT TO BE AS A DEMOCRAT. DEMOCRAT. IT’S NOT WHO I WANT TO BE AS AN IT’S NOT WHO I WANT TO BE AS AN AMERICAN. AMERICAN. AND TO THE EXTENT I HAVE ANY AND TO THE EXTENT I HAVE ANY POWER TO CONTROL THAT, I DO WHAT POWER TO CONTROL THAT, I DO WHAT I CAN AND I CALL ON OTHERS TO DO I CAN AND I CALL ON OTHERS TO DO THE SAME AND I THINK WE HAVE TO THE SAME AND I THINK WE HAVE TO HAVE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY AROUND HAVE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY AROUND THAT. THAT. >> IF THAT IS A PERSISTENT >> IF THAT IS A PERSISTENT PROBLEM IN THE MOVEMENT AROUND PROBLEM IN THE MOVEMENT AROUND SENATOR SANDERS, THAT WAS A SENATOR SANDERS, THAT WAS A PROBLEM THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE PROBLEM THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE COMPLAINED ABOUT IN 2016 AROUND COMPLAINED ABOUT IN 2016 AROUND HIS PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. HIS PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. ALL THE MORE SO THIS YEAR. ALL THE MORE SO THIS YEAR. AND THE SENATOR, YOU KNOW, SAYS AND THE SENATOR, YOU KNOW, SAYS THAT HE’S AGAINST IT AND SAYS THAT HE’S AGAINST IT AND SAYS THAT HE’S CONDEMNED IT. THAT HE’S CONDEMNED IT. I’VE TALKED TO HIM ABOUT IT I’VE TALKED TO HIM ABOUT IT DIRECTLY, BUT IF IT IS A DIRECTLY, BUT IF IT IS A PERSISTENT PROBLEM AND PERSISTENT PROBLEM AND THERE’S -- FOR WHATEVER REASON THERE’S -- FOR WHATEVER REASON HE CAN’T CONTROL IT OR IT’S NOT HE CAN’T CONTROL IT OR IT’S NOT BEING CONTROLLED BY HIM, IS BEING CONTROLLED BY HIM, IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE THAT THE THERE SOMETHING ELSE THAT THE PARTY COULD DO ABOUT THAT? PARTY COULD DO ABOUT THAT? I ASK BECAUSE I THINK THAT IT I ASK BECAUSE I THINK THAT IT HAS AN ONGOING SCHISMATIC EFFECT HAS AN ONGOING SCHISMATIC EFFECT IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. >> YEAH. >> YEAH. >> I THINK IN 2016 IT MADE IT >> I THINK IN 2016 IT MADE IT VERY HARD FOR THE POST-PRIMARY VERY HARD FOR THE POST-PRIMARY GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF HILLARY CLINTON TO GET ANYWHERE HILLARY CLINTON TO GET ANYWHERE NEAR SUCCESS, AND I THINK IT’S NEAR SUCCESS, AND I THINK IT’S GOING TO DO THE SAME THING GOING TO DO THE SAME THING WHETHER OR NOT SENATOR SANDERS WHETHER OR NOT SENATOR SANDERS IS THE NOMINEE THIS TIME. IS THE NOMINEE THIS TIME. I SEE IT AS FACTIONALIST, I SEE IT AS FACTIONALIST, SCHISMATIC AND INJURIOUS. SCHISMATIC AND INJURIOUS. IF HE CAN’T FIX IT, I DON’T KNOW IF HE CAN’T FIX IT, I DON’T KNOW IF THERE’S ANYBODY ELSE WHO CAN. IF THERE’S ANYBODY ELSE WHO CAN. >> I THINK OF IT MORE AS HAS THE >> I THINK OF IT MORE AS HAS THE TIME COME FOR US TO START TIME COME FOR US TO START THINKING MORE CREATEIVELY ABOUT THINKING MORE CREATEIVELY ABOUT HOW TO DO THIS? HOW TO DO THIS? DO YOU SET UP SOMETHING, FOR DO YOU SET UP SOMETHING, FOR EXAMPLE, FROM THE CAMPAIGN THAT EXAMPLE, FROM THE CAMPAIGN THAT EVERY SINGLE DAY ANSWERS BACK TO EVERY SINGLE DAY ANSWERS BACK TO THIS WITH THE -- THE AUTHORITY THIS WITH THE -- THE AUTHORITY OF THAT PERSON’S CAMPAIGN AND OF THAT PERSON’S CAMPAIGN AND SAYS, WE’RE NOT DOING THIS, I’M SAYS, WE’RE NOT DOING THIS, I’M FLAGGING THESE. FLAGGING THESE. WE DON’T LIKE THIS, WE DON’T WE DON’T LIKE THIS, WE DON’T WANT THIS, WE DON’T WANT ANY WANT THIS, WE DON’T WANT ANY PART OF THIS, WE CONDEMN IT, HOW PART OF THIS, WE CONDEMN IT, HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THIS. THIS. AND I -- AND I WANT TO SAY AND I -- AND I WANT TO SAY IT’S -- IT’S -- LET’S WORK ON IT’S -- IT’S -- LET’S WORK ON DOING THIS CREATIVELY. DOING THIS CREATIVELY. CAN GIVE YOU JUST AN ANALOGY CAN GIVE YOU JUST AN ANALOGY HERE? HERE? >> PLEASE. >> PLEASE. >> YOU KNOW HOW WE TALK ABOUT >> YOU KNOW HOW WE TALK ABOUT MONEY IN POLITICS AND WE TALK MONEY IN POLITICS AND WE TALK ABOUT THE SUPERPACs AND THE ABOUT THE SUPERPACs AND THE OUTSIDE MONEY AND SO ON, PEOPLE OUTSIDE MONEY AND SO ON, PEOPLE HAVE ALWAYS JUST SAID THERE’S HAVE ALWAYS JUST SAID THERE’S NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT. NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT. IT’S TOO BAD. IT’S TOO BAD. WHEN SCOTT BROWN AND I RAN IN WHEN SCOTT BROWN AND I RAN IN 2012, REMEMBER, WE DEVELOPED A 2012, REMEMBER, WE DEVELOPED A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TWO OF US CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TWO OF US AND SAID WE’RE GOING TO KEEP AND SAID WE’RE GOING TO KEEP SUPERPAC MONEY OUT OF THIS SUPERPAC MONEY OUT OF THIS CAMPAIGN. CAMPAIGN. AND WE FIGURED OUT OUR OWN AND WE FIGURED OUT OUR OWN ENFORCEMENT DEVICE AND WE MADE ENFORCEMENT DEVICE AND WE MADE IT WORK. IT WORK. NOW, IT’S NOT A PERFECT ANALOGY, NOW, IT’S NOT A PERFECT ANALOGY, BUT THE POINT IS YOU DON’T HAVE BUT THE POINT IS YOU DON’T HAVE A CREATIVE SOLUTION TO SIT DOWN A CREATIVE SOLUTION TO SIT DOWN AND TRY A CREATIVE SOLUTION. AND TRY A CREATIVE SOLUTION. AND IF THE FIRST ONE DOESN’T AND IF THE FIRST ONE DOESN’T WORK, MOVE IT ASIDE AND LET’S WORK, MOVE IT ASIDE AND LET’S TRY THE SECOND, AND IF THAT ONE TRY THE SECOND, AND IF THAT ONE DOESN’T WORK, MOVE IT ASIDE AND
B1 senator politics campaign online problem relationship Warren: Time To Think More Creatively About 'Organized Nastiness' Online | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC 2 0 林宜悉 posted on 2020/03/08 More Share Save Report Video vocabulary