Tastysensehereintimetobringinoneofthosetalkingheadvideoswhereyoucouldjustfeelfreetogoaheadandminimizethisandkindoflistenasyoudoyourthing, Um, whatever I'm notworthlookingatforthenext 10 or 15 minutes, we'regonnatalkaboutsomenewCPUiscomingoutfrom a M D, somehighlyanticipatedstuffthatwe'refinallygettingallthedetailsonwherewegetourhandsonsoon.
For I guesswhathappenedtoovertimeisasrisingbecame a Mauraadoptedpartasmarketsharebecametippingbackinto a M D.
Takingbackmoreofthemarketshare.
A lotoftheboardpartnerstartedputtingmoreemphasisinqualitybuildsontheirmotherboardsversuswhereAndyusedtobebackwithFXwhenrising, firstlaunchedbecause a lotofMotherboardmanufacturersyoucouldtakethesamemotherboardfromIntelonAndy, Let's sayand I'm justsaying a Seusstrickshereforthesakeoftheymake a MDandIntelproducts.
I'm notsayingthiswasthecasewithfor a suits, butlet's justsayhypothetically, youhad a strictboardforIntelon a strictboardforAndy, therewouldbeverytangibledifferenceinqualitybetweenthe 21 wouldbeheavierthanbeef, yourtheoremsandallthatsortofstuff.
Soalthoughthenamemayhavebeenshared, thequalityallowthebrand's wasn't reallythere, and I think a lotofpeoplewouldagreewiththat.
I'm notpositiveand 39 50 x but 3900 exYoucouldrunallthewaybackonlikesomeoftheearlier X to 70 year X to 90 x 3 70 Yeah, it's confusingbecauseIntel a nametheyweresortoffightingoverwhohadthehighernumber.
Butanyway, there's backwardscompatibilitythere.
A 16 core 32 threadpart.
Whatwe'veseenwith 3900 X isthatthecoreclocksaresomewhatdisappointing.
Yes, it's onSentsevencentimeterwith 14 centimeter I oweddieontheirstuff, butsevenenemyorprocessallowedforgreat i p c improvement I p c overIntel.
Still, obviouslyisreigningoverAndyisclockspeed, whichmakesupforthat I p c differentialorthatDelta.
So 4.2 gigahertzwasprettymuchwhere, like 3900 excappedoutandso 1800 ex, youcouldget 233.9240 soyoucouldseeoverthelast 43 to 4 yearswe'vegottenmuchmorecore.
So I wouldhavelikedtohaveseenmoreclockspeedoutof 3800 X.
I don't expecttheretobeanymorethanthe 42 wereusedtowith 3900 and 39 50.
It's justmorecourse.
Sowherethiswouldmattertoyouisifyou'rebuying a PCorbuilding a PCspecificallyforgaming, I wouldprobablystickwithwhateverCPUprobablyalreadygot.
Ifyou'reonriseinandnotnecessarilyupgradeto a 39 50 X now, thisisallhypothetical.
Still, I havenotgottenhandsonwiththis.
I'm justgoingbasedonthetrendthatwe'vealreadyseenwith A and B overthelastthreeorfouryears, whereweknowgameshave a diminishingreturnwithcorecountversusclockspeed.
Si, puesdotendtoclock a littlebithigher, but I thinkthehighestwe'veseensofarislike 44 onstandardwatercoolingair.
Andthengettingbeyondthat, asStevewithGamera, Nexushasshown, isittakes a lotofexoticcoolingand a lotoftweakingtogetitanywherenearfor 8 to 50 whichyoucaneasilygetonanIntelpart.
OfcourseNow I wouldn't evengoasfarastosaythisis a perfectgamingslashstreamingPCcausestreamingoptimizationintermsofCodexandstuffhavegottensogoodoverthelastsay, fiveyears, A lotofpeoplewereabletostreamonmuchlowerendhardwarethanthisCPUis.
Andtrustmewhen I saythecostofthesipuesmean, youbetterbedoingsomethingthatactuallyisgonnaleveragethisamountofcorecountandthreadcountunlessyou'rejustenthusiasts.
Atwhichpoint, a lotoftimes, pricingjustsimplydoesn't mattertobetrue.
DiehardenthusiastwantingthetopofthelinewithoutjustificationbeingneededNowthetotalcashonthe 39 60 x is 140 megabytescash.
I expressfourpointOwens, 72 ofwhichareavailableviaPCdevices.
Sothat's Ahlotrightthere.
It's kindoflikeyoucouldputtogetheronehellof a PC I'IIstoragebasedserverwiththatandhavegigabytesupongigabytesofsecondspertransferspeed 90 gigabitsgigabytespersecond, whichwouldbeabsolutelyinsane.
That's why I sayyoudefinitelywanttomakesurethatthisissomethingthatyourusecaseneedsthesetypesofthisamountofcorecountbecause, I mean, that's justprettyinsane.
Remember, that's wherethenewGenbisonare.
RisinbasedRedRipperstarts.
SotheAndy 39 70 X, whichisagain a 7 90 meterriseinpartfor a threadripperis a 32 core 64 threadbehemothwe'regettingupto, like, theseareobviouslygonnabe, likebasedofftheepicstuffthatwe'veseenoverthelastfewyears.
Thisisjustbeingmuchmoreconsumerfriendly, I guess.
Butthey'renotdesignatedstrictlyas a serverpartwhichatthatkindofwas.
Whichiskindoffunnybecausewe'veseennowthatthere's a trendofIntelactuallycuttingpricing.
I mean, onthesurface, itseemslikean 18 coreprocessorversus a 32 coreprocessor.
ItseemslikethevalueisgoingtobethereforAndy, butthere's somethings I wanttosortoftalkabouthere.
Oneofthereasonswhywestoppedusingtheirrisinbasededitingrig a coupleyearsbackornotlongafterPhilstartedassheuseditlike a solidsixmonths, was a 1920 x firstGentRedRipper.
Wesaw a lotofweirdness.
When I sayweirdness, I'm talkingaboutUSBdevicesrandomlydisconnectingandnotcomingbackreboots, necessarymemorycrashes, bluestreams, allsortsofthingsthatwerejustveryfirstGenexperience.
Infact, I thinkoneofthetestswouldbekindoffun, though, isjust a sortofcomparethe W 31 75 z onthatwehaveherethatwe'vecurrentlygotareoverclockingcompetitionstuffdonewithbecausethat's a 28 core 36 threatNo.
It's just, ifyoucantellalready, ifyouhave a currentrisinbasedCPUin a atleast a motherboardwithinthelasttwogenerations, you'reprettymuchreadyforthe 39 50 X IfyouarenotconcernedaboutPC a fourpointout.
Otherwise, it's probably a partthat's notgonnabethatimportanttoyou, because I findthatriseinitselfismarketedtowards a lotofgame.
Orstill, eventhoughit's highcourtcountand I thinktherebecomes a pointwherewe'vealreadysortofshownthatreducingtheamountofcoreclockyougettogetmorecourseunlessyou'reusingthosecores, you'reonlyhurtingyourselfwhenitcomestogainyourperformanceandthenthethreadripperPartsarestraightupworkstationpart.