Becausewe'llonlyfullybeknownoncewe'vehadthetheinvestigationandtheinquestinduecourse S O.
I thinkit's importantnottorushtojudgmentintermsofthespecificcase, butintermsofconvictedterrorists, I thinkpublicprotectionhastobeatthecoreofthepolicy, isn't it?
I mean, itis a specifictypeofcrimeinvolving a specifictypeofcriminalthatideologicallymotivatedon.
Then I thinkthebalancehastoerredonthesideofcaution, hugely, becausetheconsequencesofgettingitwrong, youknow, aretoohorribletoimagine.
I thinkthewiderdebateaboutrehabilitation, I think, is a widercontext.
Butspecificallyandnaturally, whenwe'retalkingaboutterroristsuspects, then I thinkthebalanceshouldbewiththeemphasisonpublicprotectionatalltimes.
Well, I thinkcertainlyintermsoflook, I don't thinkweshouldconfusethetwoherebecausewhenwe'retalkingaboutcrimeingeneral, we'retalkingabout a verydifferenttypeofcriminalin a verydifferenttypeofcontext.
Uncertainlytherewayknowthat, ofcourse, a systemwhichemphasizes a properinvestmentinProhibitionwhenpeoplearereleasedinrehabilitationwithinprisonisabsolutelyessentialintermsofloweringreoffendingrates.
I mean, that's a nonsenseautomaticallyreleaseatsomemidpoint, Ah, violentpersonwhoisconsideredtobe a threat, whetherthey're a terrorist, a childabuser, a murderer, whatevertheyshouldn't justautomatic.