Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • The following content is provided under a Creative

  • Commons license.

  • Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare

  • continue to offer high quality educational resources for free.

  • To make a donation or to view additional materials

  • from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare

  • at ocw.mit.edu.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Hey guys, hope you enjoyed the brief break

  • from the heavy technical stuff.

  • Because we're going to get right back into it

  • and develop the neutron transport equation today,

  • the one that you see on everybody's

  • t-shirts here in the department.

  • So I think multiple years folks have

  • used this equation on the back of t-shirts just be like,

  • we're awesome.

  • And we do difficult math.

  • Well, this is what you're going to start to do it.

  • In fact, it's big enough and hard enough

  • that we're going to spend all day today developing it,

  • like actually writing out the terms of the equation

  • and understanding what it actually means.

  • Before, on Thursday and Friday, we're

  • going to reduce it down to a much simpler equation,

  • something that you can actually solve and do

  • some simple reactor calculations with.

  • We started off the whole idea of the neutron transport equation

  • as a way to track some population of neutrons.

  • Let's see, I'm going to have our variable list up here.

  • What I'll probably do is on Thursday and Friday

  • I'll just have it back up on the screens

  • so that we don't have to write it twice.

  • But there's going to be a lot of variables in this equation.

  • I'm going to do my best, again, to make

  • the difference between V and nu very obvious, and anything else

  • like that.

  • But the goal is to track some population of neutrons,

  • at some position, at some energy,

  • traveling in some direction omega, as a function of time.

  • And the 3D representation of what we're looking at here

  • is let's say we had some small volume element, which

  • we'll call that our dV.

  • That's got normal vectors sticking out of it.

  • We'll call those n-hats in all directions.

  • And inside there, let's say if this is our energy scale,

  • we're tracking the population of neutrons

  • that occupies some small energy group dE,

  • and is also traveling in some small direction

  • that we designate as d-omega.

  • So that's the goal of this whole equation

  • is to track the number of neutrons at any given position.

  • So let's call this distance, or the vector r.

  • In this little volume, traveling in some direction omega,

  • with some infinitesimally small energy group d.

  • That's going to be the goal of the whole thing.

  • And what we'll do is write this to say

  • the change in the population of neutrons at a given distance,

  • energy, angle, and time, over time

  • is just going to be a sum of gain and loss terms.

  • And what I think we'll take all day today to do

  • is to figure out what are the actual physical things

  • that neutrons can do in and out of this volume,

  • and how do we turn those into math, something

  • that we can abstract and solve?

  • There's a couple other terms that we're

  • going to put up here.

  • We'll say that the flux of neutrons, which is usually

  • the variable that we actually track,

  • is just the velocity times the neutron population.

  • And also let's define some angularly independent terms.

  • Because in the end we've been talking

  • about what's the probability of some neutron

  • or particle interacting with some electron going out

  • at some angle.

  • But as we're interested in how many neutrons are there

  • in the reactor, we usually don't care in which direction

  • they're traveling.

  • So the first simplification that we will do

  • is get rid of any sort of angular dependence,

  • getting rid of two of the seven variables

  • that we're dealing with here.

  • So all these variables right here

  • will be dependent on angle.

  • And all these variables right here

  • will be angularly independent.

  • So there'll be some corresponding capital

  • N, or number of neutrons as a function of r, E, and t.

  • We'll call this Flux.

  • We'll call this Number.

  • There's going to be a number of cross sections

  • that we need to worry about.

  • So we'll refer to little sigma as a function of energy,

  • as our micro-cross-section, and big sigma of E

  • as a macroscopic cross-section.

  • Then you want to remember the relation between these two.

  • AUDIENCE: Solid angle?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: The solid angle, not quite.

  • That's, let's see.

  • There's a difference between-- and so

  • what these physically mean is little sigma

  • means the probability of interaction with one particle.

  • And this is just the total probability

  • of interaction with all the particles that may be there.

  • So yeah, Chris?

  • AUDIENCE: Number density?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: There's number density.

  • Already we have another variable conflict.

  • How do we want to resolve this?

  • Let's see.

  • We'll have to change the symbol somehow.

  • Let's make it cursive.

  • Don't know what else to do.

  • I don't want to give it a number other than n

  • since we're talking about neutrons,

  • or that right here it's going to be number density.

  • And in the end, we're worried about some sort of reaction

  • rate, which is always going to equal some flux,

  • or let's just stick with some angularly dependent flux,

  • that r, E omega t, times some cross-section

  • as a function of energy.

  • And it's these reaction rates that

  • are the rates of gains and losses of neutrons

  • out of this volume, out of this little angle,

  • out of this energy group, and out of that space,

  • or into that volume energy group and space.

  • So let's see, other terms that we'll want to define

  • include nu, like last time.

  • We'll call this neutron multiplication.

  • In other words, this is the number

  • of neutrons made on average during each fission event.

  • And we give it energy dependence because as we

  • saw on the Janis libraries on Friday, I think it was.

  • What's today, Tuesday?

  • I don't even know anymore.

  • I think as we saw on Friday, that depends on energy

  • for the higher energy levels.

  • And there's also going to be some Kai

  • spectrum, or some neutron birth spectrum,

  • which tells you the average energy at which neutrons

  • are born from fission.

  • So regardless of what energy goes in to cause the fission,

  • there's some probability distribution

  • of a neutron being born at a certain energy.

  • And it looks something like this, where that's about 1 MeV.

  • That's about 10 MeV.

  • And that average right there is around 2 MeV.

  • And so it's important to note that neutrons

  • are born at different energies.

  • Because we want to track every single possible dE

  • throughout this control volume, which

  • we'll also call a reactor.

  • Let's see, what other terms will we need to know?

  • The different types of cross sections,

  • or the different interactions that neutrons

  • can have with matter.

  • What are some of the ones that we had talked about?

  • What can neutrons do when they run into stuff?

  • AUDIENCE: Scatter.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: They can scatter.

  • So there's going to be some scattering cross-section.

  • And when they scatter, the important part

  • here is they're going to change in energy.

  • What else can they do?

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: Absorbed.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: They can be absorbed.

  • So we'll have some sigma absorption.

  • What are some of the various things that can happen

  • when a neutron is absorbed?

  • AUDIENCE: Fission.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yeah, so one of them is fission.

  • What are some of the other ones?

  • AUDIENCE: Capture.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, capture.

  • What were some of the ones that we talked about

  • during the Chadwick paper?

  • AUDIENCE: Neutron [INAUDIBLE].

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, so there can be some--

  • we'll call it n,in, which means one neutron goes in, i neutrons

  • come out, so 1 to i neutrons, sure.

  • Anything else?

  • Encompassed in absorption?

  • Well when we refer to scatter here, what type of scattering

  • are we talking about?

  • AUDIENCE: Compton's scatter?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Compton's for photons.

  • It's OK.

  • Was it elastic or inelastic scattering?

  • AUDIENCE: Elastic.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Elastic scattering.

  • So another thing you could call an absorption event, depending

  • on what bin you put things in, is inelastic scattering,

  • which is that kind of--

  • we call it scattering because one neutron goes in,

  • one neutron comes out.

  • But in reality, you have a compound nucleus forming

  • and a neutron emitted from a different energy level.

  • So it doesn't follow the simple ballistic laws of,

  • and kinematic laws of inelastic scattering.

  • What else can neutrons do?

  • Now we're getting into the real esoteric stuff.

  • But I want to see if you guys have any idea.

  • Did you know that neutrons can decay?

  • A low neutron is actually not a stable particle.

  • If you look up on the Kyrie table of nuclides,

  • it's got a half life of 12 minutes.

  • So if you happen to be able to have

  • neutrons in a bottle or something, which we actually

  • can do.

  • There's centers for ultra-cold neutrons and atoms.

  • There's one at North Carolina State where they actually cool

  • down neutrons to cryogenic temperatures to the point where

  • they can actually confine them.

  • They only live on average 12 minutes.

  • And then there would also be what we call

  • a neutron-neutron interactions.

  • There is a finite, non-zero but very small

  • probability that neutrons can hit other neutrons.

  • But the mean-free path for these is on the order of 10

  • to the 8th centimeters.

  • So this is not something we have to consider.

  • But it's interesting to know that yes, neutrons

  • can run into other neutrons.

  • And these sorts of things have been measured.

  • We won't have to worry about this.

  • We won't have to worry about neutron decay.

  • But it's interesting to note that a low neutron is not

  • a stable particle.

  • It will spontaneously undergo beta decay,

  • into a proton and an electron.

  • Pretty neat, huh?

  • Anyway, if we sum up all these possible interactions,

  • we have one other cross-section, which

  • we're going to call the total cross-section, the probability

  • of absolutely any interaction occurring at all.

  • Because any sort of interaction of that neutron

  • is going to cause removal from this group of energy position,

  • angle, location, whatever.

  • Whether it's absorption, or fission, or elastic scattering,

  • or inelastic scattering, any sort of event--

  • except for forward scattering, which means nothing happens--

  • is going to result in this neutron either leaving

  • the volume.

  • So it might scatter out of our little volume.

  • Or it might change direction, scatter out of our d-omega.

  • Or it will lose some energy, or gain

  • some energy, in some cases, leaving our little dE, which

  • is what we're trying to track.

  • Because we're actually tracking what's

  • the population of neutrons in this little dE,

  • in this direction, in this position, at this time.

  • And supposedly if we know this term fully,

  • we can solve for all the neutrons

  • everywhere, anywhere in the reactor with full information.

  • So what we'll spend the rest of today doing

  • is figuring out what are all the possible gain and loss terms.

  • So let's start just putting them out physically, or in words.

  • And then we'll put them to math.

  • So what are some of the ways in which neutrons

  • can enter our little group of volume, angle, and energy?

  • How are neutrons created?

  • Yeah, Luke?

  • AUDIENCE: From fission, or a neutron emission.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: From fission, yeah, so that's one big source.

  • So we'll call this a gains.

  • This is a losses.

  • And you said a neutron source.

  • Can you be more specific?

  • AUDIENCE: A neutron emission, like [INAUDIBLE]..

  • MICHAEL SHORT: OK, so we'll say n,in reactions, right?

  • OK, cool.

  • How else can we gain neutrons?

  • AUDIENCE: Fusion?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Fusion?

  • OK.

  • That is true.

  • Although fusion reactors don't really

  • operate on the principle of neutron criticality, or neutron

  • balance.

  • So this discussion for now is going

  • to be limited to fission reactors.

  • But yeah, good point.

  • Fusion does make neutrons.

  • What else?

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: They could enter from one of the adjacent volume?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yeah, they could come from somewhere else,

  • right?

  • Let's just call that an external source.

  • In the books and in your reading,

  • you'll just see them treat this external source

  • as some variable s of r, E, omega, t.

  • So you'll just see this treated as s, a source,

  • with no further explanation.

  • It's like, oh, math says that there

  • could be external sources.

  • But I want to tell you where they really come from.

  • Most reactors nowadays don't just

  • start up when you throw a bunch of uranium into a pool

  • and pull out the control rods.

  • You actually have to stick in--

  • if this is your little reactor right here--

  • you actually have to stick in a little piece of californium--

  • I think the isotope is 252--

  • as what we call a kickstarter source.

  • So californium is made mostly in the HFIR, or the High Flux

  • Isotope Reactor, at the Oakridge National Lab in Tennessee,

  • where they have a really, really high power reactor.

  • It's 85 megawatts.

  • It's about that big around and this tall.

  • It's really, really small.

  • For reference, that's about the size of the MIT reactor,

  • except our reactor's 6 megawatts.

  • Theirs is 85 megawatts.

  • And it's designed to be an incredibly high flux,

  • to go by neutron capture, and neutron capture reactions,

  • to build up californium 252, which is spontaneously

  • giving off neutrons like crazy.

  • And this right here, that's your external source.

  • And this helps get reactors going.

  • Because you can either very slowly

  • wait for the fission reaction to build up

  • in a controlled manner.

  • Or you can give it a kick in the pants and get it going.

  • This HFIR reactor is pretty cool.

  • Like I said, it's 85 megawatts.

  • And it's about as dense as it can get.

  • The fuel is actually made by explosively bonding sheets

  • of uranium in a certain sort of semi-cylindrical configuration.

  • And it produces so much decay heat in so little space

  • that if it were to lose cooling, the reactor

  • would melt in 8 seconds.

  • You usually have days or so before

  • that happens in a conventional reactor

  • because the power density just isn't that high.

  • So you can actually see down to the tank

  • that contains HFIR if you go for a tour at Oakridge National

  • Lab.

  • And it's way down below this gigantic like, not quite

  • Olympic, but getting there sized pool of water,

  • just to make sure that there is adequate

  • cooling for this thing.

  • It's intense.

  • But that's just a notice that these external sources,

  • these are real things that we use in power reactors

  • to get them going.

  • What are some other ways that one could make neutrons,

  • or that neutrons could enter into our energy group?

  • And the silence is expected because this is usually

  • the hardest part of developing this equation.

  • And I want to introduce it.

  • Yeah, Luke?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] scattering, too.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: That's exactly it.

  • They can scatter in.

  • So when we develop this neutron transport equation,

  • we're not just tracking the neutrons

  • in this little energy group dE, direction, d-omega, and volume

  • dV.

  • You actually have to know what's the population of neutrons

  • in every single group.

  • Because you might have a neutron at a higher energy level that

  • undergoes scattering from some different energy,

  • E-prime into our energy group.

  • So continuing with our gigantic list of variables,

  • we're going to call E is, we'll say r energy.

  • And this vector omega is our direction,

  • the one that we're tracking.

  • And E-prime is going to be some other energy.

  • And omega-vector-prime is going to be some coming

  • from some other direction.

  • And like Luke said, this is what we

  • would refer to as in-scattering, which means some neutron comes,

  • that was going in a different direction, that

  • did have a different energy, and has now

  • entered into the single group that we're tracking.

  • Eventually we're going to integrate over all energies

  • to track all energy groups.

  • So that's where we're going.

  • And there's one more term that I want to introduce right now.

  • It's what's called the scattering kernel.

  • Don't ask me why it's called kernel.

  • But this is just the terminology I want you guys to get used to.

  • And there's going to be some sort of probability function

  • where a neutron starts off at a different energy, E-prime,

  • and in a different direction, omega-prime.

  • And it enters into our group energy E and direction omega.

  • Right now we'll leave it as a highly general function.

  • What we're going to find later is there's just

  • some sort of simple line to it.

  • If you guys remember, if some neutron starts off,

  • let's see, probability of entering into some energy

  • group.

  • If you notice, if you remember from last time,

  • the neutron, when it undergoes any sort of scattering

  • reaction, can end up with any energy

  • between its original energy for the case of theta equals 0,

  • and this parameter, alpha energy, for the case theta

  • equals pi, where alpha is A minus 1,

  • over A plus 1 squared, where A is the atomic mass.

  • You guys remember this from back in the Q equation

  • days, when we were finding out what's

  • the probability that a neutron coming in with energy E

  • ends up at any energy E-prime?

  • Actually I'll just write this as the scattering kernel.

  • What it ends up looking like, in most cases,

  • is just a flat line.

  • There's an equal probability of the neutron ending up anywhere

  • between energy E and anywhere between energy

  • alpha-E. It's actually a pretty simple function.

  • It's just a constant value here and 0 everywhere else.

  • What that means is that if, let's say,

  • a neutron hits a uranium atom, there is no way in hell

  • that it can transfer all of its energy

  • to a uranium atom because of conservation of energy

  • and momentum, like we've been harping on for kind

  • of this whole class.

  • What's the only time that this alpha-E could actually

  • extend all the way to 0?

  • What case would that be?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

  • AUDIENCE: You're hitting another neutron.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: You're hitting another neutron, which,

  • as we said, is a very rare event.

  • That is true.

  • Or what else could you be hitting?

  • AUDIENCE: A proton?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: A proton, hydrogen. That's right.

  • So it can only be, let's say you can only

  • have the probability of the neutron ending up

  • with any energy for the case of hydrogen. Incidentally,

  • this is why we fill light water reactors

  • with hydrogen. The goal is to get

  • the neutrons as slow as possible as quick as possible.

  • Interesting sentence to say there, right?

  • We want the neutrons to be as low energy as possible

  • as rapidly as possible.

  • And the best way to do that is to fill the reactor

  • with hydrogen because then any collision could, in theory, get

  • the neutron down to zero energy.

  • Without water, or something with the same mass as a neutron,

  • like another neutron, there is no way

  • that that neutron can slow down by very much.

  • So even though we're going to keep it

  • as this generalized function, note that in reality it's

  • this pretty simple function.

  • It changes a little bit, as there

  • can be a forward scattering bias for some neutron reactions.

  • But we are not going to deal with that this year.

  • You will deal with that next year in 22.05.

  • So I've been saying a lot, oh, well, we're

  • not going to go into this topic because you're going to see it

  • in 22.02, which is quantum.

  • Now I switched gears to say, we're

  • not going to go into the way this function changes

  • because you'll see it next year in 22.05,

  • which is neutron physics.

  • But for now I want you to be prepared for 22.05.

  • So we'll put on in-scattering as one of our gains.

  • There's a last one I want to make you aware of.

  • We very briefly touched upon it.

  • But I wouldn't be surprised if no one remembers because it

  • was for like 10 seconds.

  • It's what's called photo fission.

  • What this means is you have some reaction that would, in comes

  • a gamma, and out goes fission.

  • This actually does start to happen around 3 or 4 MeV,

  • for isotopes like uranium 235.

  • And in our reactor, whatever shape we decide it is,

  • there are tons of gamma rays flying about in all directions

  • at very high energy.

  • Does anyone remember where they come from?

  • Anyone remember the fission timeline

  • that we drew on Friday?

  • So what we said there was right away,

  • let's say fission happens.

  • And almost instantly, you get your fission product one

  • and fission product two.

  • And they move around for a little while.

  • And then some of them will emit some neutrons.

  • And then some of them will start to emit gamma rays, betas,

  • and whatever else they're going to do until they finally

  • lose all their kinetic energy and stop in the surrounding

  • fuel, creating the heat that actually powers the turbine

  • and make steam to make electricity.

  • And so it's from these gammas, as well as

  • any of the gammas from the decay products of the fission

  • products that lead to a huge flux of gamma rays firing out

  • from all sides in the reactor.

  • That's one of the main things that you actually have

  • to shield in a nuclear reactor.

  • Since we talked about all sorts of different shielding,

  • and all sorts of ways that you have to shield things,

  • you know from seeing the MIT reactor-- which you all did--

  • that there's like six feet of lead and concrete

  • shielding around the reactor.

  • It's not there to shield the alphas and the betas,

  • because those don't really make it out of the water.

  • It's not there to shield the soft X-rays that betas

  • make from bremsstrahlung.

  • It's also not there to shield the neutrons

  • because the neutrons don't really get out.

  • They bounce around, or get absorbed in the water,

  • or the fuel, the reflector.

  • It's there to shield the high-energy gamma rays.

  • Because the only thing that stops

  • high energy gamma rays is lots of mass

  • in between the source and you.

  • So we know there's tons of gammas all about.

  • So let's say there's also going to be some gamma ray flux.

  • There'll be some gamma ray energy.

  • And there'll be some cross-section for photo fission

  • as a function of the incoming gamma ray energy spectrum.

  • Now I'm adding terms to the ones that you'll see in the reading

  • because drawing them out in math is actually fairly instructive.

  • They all follow the same pattern.

  • So instead of just showing you one of each

  • and saying memorize, we'll develop a whole lot of these.

  • And you'll find out that they all

  • actually look almost the same.

  • Can anyone else think of any possible gains of neutrons?

  • Where else could they come from?

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: Neutron birth spectrum, is that?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: So the neutron birth spectrum

  • is included in fission.

  • So our nu is in there.

  • Our chi of E is in there.

  • And that's a nu of E. That's all accounted

  • for in the fission term.

  • And we'll see how we put that together to math.

  • And if no one else has any ideas, that's good.

  • Because neither do I.

  • Now what about the lost terms?

  • There aren't too many of these, as long

  • as you lump them correctly.

  • So what sort of ways could neutrons

  • be lost from our energy group?

  • Yep?

  • AUDIENCE: Scatter out.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Scatter out, yep.

  • They can undergo any kind of scattering reaction.

  • And they will probably change direction and energy.

  • What else?

  • Well, we've got to list up on the board right there, right?

  • Capture, fission, because in order

  • to undergo a vision you actually have to lose a neutron,

  • and so on, and so on, and so on.

  • What I want to do to simplify things is this.

  • It's a lot simpler just to track the total cross-section,

  • the probability of any interaction

  • at all whatsoever, because any interaction

  • will cause the neutron to either change energy and angle,

  • or disappear, even if it makes some other ones.

  • So we can simplify this to just the total cross-section term.

  • And there's only one other way that neutrons

  • can leave our energy angle and volume group.

  • What would that be?

  • So any reaction takes care of energy and angle.

  • What about volume?

  • How do neutrons leave the control volume?

  • It's simpler than it may sound.

  • They just go.

  • They just move.

  • The neutrons are always moving, right?

  • We'll call that leakage.

  • Because every neutron's got a speed, like we showed up here,

  • where the flux of neutrons, the number

  • of neutrons moving through some surface per second,

  • is just their velocity times the number that are there.

  • For there to be a neutron flux there

  • has to be a velocity, which means the neutrons are moving.

  • So the neutrons, even without undergoing any reaction,

  • could just move out of our control volume.

  • And then they're gone.

  • And that's all there is for gain and loss terms.

  • So let's see if we can do this all on one board.

  • I want to start putting this table right here into math

  • that we'll be able to abstract, simplify, and then solve,

  • but not today, not solve today.

  • So if we want to track the change

  • in the number of neutrons as a function of time,

  • let's start writing down the gain terms.

  • So how do we describe the number of neutrons

  • produced from fission?

  • What sort of terms do we have to include?

  • And Jared started kicking us off, so what would you say?

  • AUDIENCE: Neutron birth?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, so the neutron birth spectrum,

  • there's going to be some probability that a neutron is

  • born in our energy group E. Because we're

  • tracking how many neutrons are in our little dE energy group.

  • What else matters in terms of fission?

  • AUDIENCE: Number of fissions?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, number of fissions.

  • So if we want to write number of fissions,

  • we have to write that as a reaction rate.

  • So let's take those two terms right there.

  • So we'll have sigma fission.

  • In this case, we're going to write E-prime times flux

  • of r E-prime, omega-prime, t.

  • Why did I write E and omega prime here?

  • Just from a physical reason.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: So you're going to be coming from another energy

  • group.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Precisely.

  • That's right.

  • So the neutrons are going to be produced from some other energy

  • group.

  • For example, the fission birth spectrum right here

  • starts out--

  • where did it go?

  • I knew I drew it somewhere-- at one MeV.

  • But most of the neutrons that cause fission to happen

  • are way down below 1 eV.

  • So it's different energy neutrons

  • that cause neutrons to be born in our energy group.

  • That's why we're using E-prime and not E.

  • It's some other energy group.

  • And so we also have to account for all possible other energy

  • groups.

  • So if we want to write this, right, we'll

  • say this could be as low as 0 eV, to our maximum energy.

  • And there's going to be some d-omega-prime, dE-prime, dV.

  • We'll also have to account for all possible angles

  • and integrate over our entire volume.

  • It's going to look ugly quick, but it's all

  • going to be understandable.

  • So what this says is that we have

  • to account for the reaction rate of fission

  • from all other energy neutrons inside our volume

  • from other energies and other angles,

  • and account for every other possible energy.

  • Because they can all make fission happen.

  • What else is missing in terms of describing the number

  • of neutrons made from fission?

  • AUDIENCE: Neutron multiplication.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, there's the number

  • of neutrons made per fission.

  • So we have to put in our neutron multiplication factor.

  • And in this case, normalize--

  • I think someone had mentioned solid angle-- we normalize over

  • all possible angles with an over 4 pi in there.

  • And this right here is the fission term.

  • So this tells us the number of neutrons

  • gained in terms of a reaction rate,

  • times the number of neutrons for each of those reactions,

  • times the probability that there just

  • happened to be born in the energy group

  • that we're tracking.

  • So is there any term here that's unclear to folks?

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: So what's the lower bound on the first integral?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: On the first integral?

  • That 0 electron volts.

  • AUDIENCE: Oh, OK.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Because supposedly you

  • could have a neutron at 0 eV, which

  • has a very high cross-section.

  • So it should probably induce fission.

  • In reality, there might be some actual minimum temperature.

  • But there is a non-zero probability

  • that you could have a neutron at rest.

  • It's just not very large.

  • AUDIENCE: And the top bound?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: The top bound as E max, whatever

  • your maximum neutron energy is.

  • This is usually around 10 MeV, for most fission reactors.

  • That E max is going to be this point right here, the highest

  • energy at which neutrons can be born by any process.

  • And so this term right here is going

  • to serve as a template for all the other gain and loss terms.

  • So I think this is the hardest one that we had

  • to develop from the beginning.

  • Now let's develop the term for, let's just

  • go with external sources, pretty easy.

  • There's going to be some source making neutrons.

  • It's something that you would just impose.

  • Like say, all right, I have a californium source giving off

  • this many neutrons.

  • Well then you know how many neutrons it's giving off.

  • And that one's done.

  • That's easy.

  • So we've done fission.

  • We've done external.

  • Now that we've done fission let's tackle photo fission.

  • So what would be photo fission cross-section look like?

  • It's going to look awfully similar.

  • So what sort of things do you need

  • to know if it's a fission reaction?

  • Well, what do we have up here?

  • Just start reading things off.

  • I heard a murmur.

  • What was that?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] flux.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yeah, so you're going

  • to have to have some flux.

  • In this case, we want to know what's the flux of gamma rays

  • because photo fission starts off with a gamma,

  • then ends up with a fission.

  • And it's also going to be in our volume.

  • It's going to matter what the energy of those gammas is.

  • They'll all be traveling in some direction at some time.

  • What else do we need?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] the 4 pi [INAUDIBLE]..

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yeah, if we're going

  • to be going over all angles, you need the 4 pi.

  • What else?

  • Do we have a reaction rate yet?

  • AUDIENCE: No.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: No, well what's missing?

  • AUDIENCE: The cross-section.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: That's right.

  • We need a cross-section.

  • And in this case, instead of just fission,

  • or neutron fission, we'll put in the gamma fission

  • cross-section.

  • And so now we have a reaction rate for a single reaction.

  • We've got to integrate over all of our gamma ray

  • energies, over all angles, over our volume.

  • What else is missing besides our d-omega, dE gamma, d-Volume.

  • It should look awfully similar because the terms are basically

  • exactly the same, with just different cross sections

  • and energies in there.

  • So what's missing between the photo fission and the neutron

  • fission one?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Sure, there might be some different birth

  • spectrum for gammas.

  • And there might be some different multiplication

  • factor for gammas between neutron fission and photo

  • fission.

  • But these terms should look exactly the same

  • because in every case you're looking at some reaction

  • rate between either the neutrons and fission or the gamma

  • and fission.

  • And you need to know at what energy they're born,

  • how many are made, all the angles,

  • and integrate overall the variables that we care about.

  • And this is part of why I'm adding these extra terms

  • because they end up looking all exactly the same.

  • It's the integral of a reaction rate times some stuff.

  • That's all that every single one of these terms is going to be.

  • So we've got photo fission.

  • Now let's tackle in-scattering.

  • So how do we represent scattering?

  • In the same way that we represented fission, what do we

  • start with inside the integral?

  • AUDIENCE: Reaction rate?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Reaction rate, yes.

  • So we're going to have some scattering cross-section.

  • And if it's in the scattering, it

  • means it's coming from a different energy, hence

  • the prime.

  • We'll have our flux.

  • And here's where we're going to bring in our scattering kernel.

  • Because there's some probability that the neutron

  • scatters in from a different group.

  • And then we'll have our d-omega, dE-prime, dV.

  • Is this complete yet?

  • We've now accounted for one other energy, E-prime.

  • Now how do we account for all possible other energies

  • scattering into our energy group?

  • AUDIENCE: Integrals.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, again, same integrals.

  • We integrate over all possible energies,

  • over all possible angles, and over our volume.

  • Hopefully these terms are looking very similar.

  • In every case it's a volume, angle, energy integral

  • of a reaction rate.

  • And all that's saying is there's some rate that these reactions

  • are occurring, which is either a gain rate or a loss rate.

  • We integrate over whatever volume, energy, and angle

  • we're tracking.

  • And that's all there is to it.

  • So we've got in-scattering.

  • Now let's tackle the n,in reactions.

  • There's only going to be one little difference.

  • But I want you guys to tell me what sort of things

  • are going to be the same as all the other terms

  • that we have here.

  • So what do we start off with inside the integral?

  • AUDIENCE: Reaction rate.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: A reaction rate.

  • And how do we write that?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, a cross-section,

  • there's going to be some cross-section,

  • for, let's call it n,in reaction as a function of energy,

  • times a flux.

  • There'll be our normal integrated over all angles,

  • all energies, and our volume.

  • So we have a reaction rate.

  • What do we have to then integrate that reaction right

  • over to get all the neutrons in?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] same things.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Same things as everything else, exactly.

  • Integrate over all possible energies,

  • integrate over all possible angles,

  • integrate over our volume, looks quite similar.

  • The only thing we haven't dealt with is this i term right here.

  • Because there can be, there are actually n,2n reactions, n,3n,

  • n,4n, and so on.

  • So there are probabilities that, let's say

  • you, in goes 1 neutron, out comes 3 neutrons.

  • But no fission actually happened.

  • You just blast a few of them out.

  • So I think all we'd really have to do is sum over i equals 1.

  • Oh, I'm sorry, i equals 2, because a neutron

  • going in and then the same neutron going out,

  • that's just scattering.

  • And what would be the maximum?

  • Probably 4.

  • Because the probability of an increasing i

  • or more neutrons coming out gets lower and lower as you go.

  • In fact, these reactions don't even turn on until--

  • the n,2n reaction turns on and around like 1 MeV.

  • This one turns on and around like 5 MeV.

  • This one turns on at like 12 MeV.

  • I was just looking up these cross-sections before class.

  • So if you have a reaction that doesn't happen

  • beyond your highest neutron energy,

  • you probably don't need to worry about it.

  • But the reason I had us write all these extra equations--

  • and I think that the t-shirt for this department needs some

  • updating to include these extra terms--

  • is because they're all the same term.

  • It is in every case, it's an integral

  • over all of our stuff of a reaction rate,

  • d-stuff, times a multiplier.

  • Every single term in this equation

  • follows the exact same pattern.

  • So what I hope, and I would expect out of you guys,

  • is that if I were to give you this table

  • of possible reactions, you would be

  • able to recreate this neutron transport equation using

  • this template to know that every single reaction is just

  • multiplier, times integral of stuff of a reaction rate,

  • d-stuff, where the reaction rate is just a cross-section times

  • a flux.

  • That's all there is to it.

  • Not bad when you see that everything follows

  • the same pattern, right?

  • That's the basis behind most of the hideous equations

  • that you see in all of physics everywhere,

  • is if there are additive or subtractive terms,

  • they'd better be in the same units.

  • And so they're going to follow some sort

  • of a similar template.

  • Not too scary when you think of it that way.

  • So let's now come up with the loss terms.

  • I should have planned these boards better.

  • Keep these ones here so we keep a template.

  • And we'll have a minus, well, how

  • do we write the anything reaction using this template?

  • How many neutrons undergo a reaction

  • when one neutron undergoes a reaction?

  • Yeah, 1.

  • So our multiplier is 1.

  • We don't have to worry about it.

  • We have our integral of stuff.

  • So we'll have to integrate over all possible volumes, angles,

  • and energy.

  • And what's on the inside?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] total cross-section.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Yep, total cross-section

  • as a function of energy times the flux, d-stuff to save time.

  • So don't worry, even though the boards are laid out funny,

  • on the pictures of the blackboard that we'll

  • put on the Stellar site, I'll Photoshop these and arrange

  • them so that they're all in sequence.

  • And you can see everything.

  • And then there's the last term to account for.

  • That's the leakage term.

  • This one is a little different.

  • It's the only one that's a little different.

  • And in this case, we're going to say that our little volume

  • element also has a surface to it.

  • And if the neutrons leave the surface,

  • then they leave the volume.

  • So in this case, we'll have a surface integral of our neutron

  • flux, say our neutron flux dS.

  • Because there's no reaction happening when neutrons just

  • move, right.

  • They just go.

  • And so, well, we'd also have to multiply by our normal vector.

  • Because every flux is going to have

  • a certain number of neutrons moving in a certain direction.

  • Let's say we were tracking the flow of neutrons

  • through this surface right here.

  • And if we had a flux going in exactly this direction,

  • through this surface, and this is the normal vector,

  • in this case, flux, which is a vector

  • dotted with the normal vector, is just the flux.

  • Which is to say that if the flux and the normal vector

  • are aligned in the same way, then every neutron going

  • through the surface is tracked as going through the surface.

  • To take the opposite example, what about the situation where

  • you have a surface here and you have a mono-directional flux

  • of neutrons in this direction.

  • And that is your surface normal.

  • What does the flux dotted with the surface normal vector

  • equal?

  • 0, it's just a dot product between the direction

  • that your neutrons are moving and the normal vector saying,

  • does it go out of the surface at all?

  • So for these two limiting cases, in this case, the fluxes just

  • let's say, what is it, the number

  • of neutrons leaving the surface is the flux.

  • In this case, no neutrons leave the surface

  • because they're not actually going through the surface.

  • It's a good time to mention, again, that these units of flux

  • are in neutrons per centimeter squared per second, which

  • is to say the number of particles traveling

  • through this area in centimeter squared every second.

  • I know we've gone over it before,

  • but I want you to keep these units in mind.

  • Because now they actually have a little more physical

  • significance.

  • And that's why we have this flux times normal vector dS.

  • That describes the number of neutrons

  • that get through the surface.

  • The last thing we'll do, because everything else is a volume

  • integral, we want this to be a volume integral because we're

  • going to simplify this in terms of getting

  • rid of all the volume stuff.

  • We're going to use what's called the divergence theorem.

  • I hear some snickering.

  • Because I remember this is probably

  • something where you were told in 1801 or 1802, this exists.

  • Use it in a few problems.

  • Moving on.

  • That sound about right?

  • This is when you actually use it.

  • So the divergence theorem says that the integral

  • of some variable F dS, through some volume element of surface,

  • is the same as the volume integral of--

  • how does this go--

  • del dot F dV.

  • And this is going to be quite important because one,

  • it gives us a volume integral.

  • So this is, it will be a volume integral of our del dot flux

  • dV, so now everything's in the same units.

  • And if we were to say forget about our little volume

  • element.

  • Let's just assume an infinite reactor.

  • Every single volume integral in term just instantly disappears.

  • Because we wrote these equations to be

  • identical for any dV anywhere inside this reactor.

  • If the reactor is then infinite, then all of those volume terms

  • disappear.

  • And that's the first simplification

  • that we'll make in the next class.

  • But right here on these five boards,

  • we've developed the neutron transport equation,

  • which is the absolute, most general, highest escalated

  • form of how do you track neutrons

  • through any volume, any direction, any energy,

  • at any time.

  • And we'll spend Thursday and Friday simplifying this

  • to something that we can solve.

  • The other reason that we use this divergence theorem

  • is because we're going to make an approximation.

  • This crazy looking thing right here,

  • we will make an approximation called the diffusion

  • approximation where we assume that neutrons

  • are like a gas that just diffuse away from each other.

  • And that's going to make solving this really, really easy.

  • It's going to go from some second order

  • differential or differential integral equation

  • to just the equation that you can solve with algebra.

  • Yep?

  • AUDIENCE: Do you need the dE d-omega for the last term?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: Probably, yeah, over all E, over all omega.

  • And that flux is going to be of r, E omega, t.

  • Absolutely.

  • Just to make sure, everything is in the same units,

  • every term has a fairly similar template.

  • The only difference is leakage, there's no reaction here.

  • Every single other term constitutes a reaction.

  • And they all follow this template.

  • So I will stop here because it is five of.

  • See if anyone has any quick questions

  • on what you've got here.

  • I'll make sure to get all of this on the board images

  • so you guys can take a look at it.

  • And I'll projected up on the screen

  • so that we can make some simplifications based on what

  • we see here on Thursday.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: What is the neutron birth spectrum?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: The neutron birth spectrum

  • says that if you have any old fission event, what's

  • the probability of those neutrons being

  • born at different energies?

  • What this says is that they're born between 1 and 10 MeV,

  • with a peak at around 2 MeV.

  • But if you want to track the number of neutrons

  • in every energy group, you need to know where they begin.

  • Good question.

  • So if any of the terms here are unclear what they physically

  • mean, because that's what I'm most interested in you

  • guys knowing, please do ask either on Piazza,

  • on email, on Thursday.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: What's the difference between the big N

  • and the little n again?

  • MICHAEL SHORT: The big N and the little n, which one?

  • The cursive one, or this one?

  • AUDIENCE: The little n up top there and then

  • the non-cursive one.

  • MICHAEL SHORT: OK, the little n and the non-cursive one.

  • The little n is the number of neutrons in a volume,

  • at a certain energy, going in a direction, at a certain time.

  • Big N right here is just number density, number

  • of atoms per centimeter cubed.

  • Cursive n is the number of neutrons at an energy,

  • in a volume.

  • We don't care where they're going.

  • And the reason I write these terms up here is we

  • are going to switch from lowercase to capital,

  • or angularly-dependent to angularly-independent

  • by making a simple approximation to say,

  • we don't care what direction they're going.

  • We just care if they're there.

  • But in real complex neutron physics problems,

  • like the one solved at the computational reactor physics

  • group, you need to know all the angles.

  • And you need to know the probability

  • or the cross-section that a neutron coming in at this angle

  • leaves at that angle and imparts a certain energy.

  • Because they're all different.

  • For the purposes of this class, I just

  • want you to know that they exist.

  • And the first thing we will do is simplify them away.

  • But this way, you'll be fully prepared

  • for 22.05 and a lifetime of reactor physics,

  • if you so choose.

  • Who here is done a year op in the computational reactor

  • physics group?

  • Just one, OK.

  • I recommend more.

  • They tend to be the biggest group in the department.

  • They've got like 20 grad students

  • and probably more year ops than that.

  • So try it out.

  • It's what makes us us, us nukes, right,

  • is neutrons and tracking them to ridiculous proportions.

  • OK, definitely want to let you guys go it's one of.

  • So I'll see you all on Thursday.

The following content is provided under a Creative

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it