Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • [ ♪ Intro ]

  • 2019 is kind of a big year for the space community,

  • because it marks the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 lunar landing.

  • 50 years ago, the first astronauts successfully landed on another world

  • and came home to tell the story,

  • which is a pretty big deal.

  • It was such a big deal that we're doing something really special to celebrate!

  • On Wednesday, July 17th, SciShow is launching its first-ever documentary episode!

  • A few months ago, our team started asking the question,

  • Was the Apollo program actually a good idea?”

  • And shortly afterward, SciShow writer Alexis Stempien and associate producer Hiroka Matsushima

  • traveled all over the country finding experts who could tell us more.

  • Alexis interviewed museum curators, former Apollo engineers, current NASA scientists,

  • and even some science YouTubers.

  • And now, we're super excited to share this episode with you.

  • But before you watch it, it might help to know a little bit about how all of the science and engineering

  • that went into the Apollo program.

  • We had to discover and invent a lot before we landed on the Moon,

  • but this episode should catch you up.

  • Many people think the American space program began in 1961,

  • when President John Kennedy made a famous speech announcing

  • that the U.S. would put a man on the Moon and bring him home

  • by the end of the decade.

  • But while this speech was important,

  • it actually happened after the first Americans had been to space.

  • People were dreaming of a Moon mission even before it had a deadline.

  • A lot of that work began with something called Project Mercury.

  • And here's Caitlin with more.

  • Project Mercury, America's first human spaceflight program, lasted from 1958 to 1963.

  • And in those few years, NASA went from a rocket that launched

  • half an hour before it was supposed to and blew up on the launch pad, by the way,

  • all the way to putting someone in orbit for almost a day and a half.

  • And at every step of the way, they were solving problems that influenced

  • the future of the American space program.

  • Project Mercury started out with three specific objectives:

  • One, NASA wanted to put a human in orbit around Earth;

  • two, they wanted to see how the human body responded to being in space

  • since no American had ever left Earth before; and three, they wanted to bring the astronaut

  • and their ship back to Earth safely.

  • And yes, it's a little alarming that putting someone in orbit and

  • bringing them alive back were separate goals.

  • The first launch of Project Mercury was on August 21, 1959, and it did not go well.

  • The goal of Little Joe 1, as the unmanned booster was called,

  • was to test the escape system

  • you know, that thing that astronauts would need in case something went terribly wrong.

  • About half an hour before the scheduled launch, there was an explosion.

  • When the smoke cleared, the crowd that had gathered

  • to watch the rocket lift off saw that Little Joe had unexpectedly launched.

  • At least, parts of it did.

  • Other parts were still sitting on the launch pad, waiting to be sent up into the sky.

  • The problem was that a pair of electrical circuits got crossed,

  • which sent mixed signals to the rest of the ship.

  • The next launch, Big Joe 1, successfully tested the heat shields

  • though there were still problems with the actual launching part of things.

  • Throughout the project, the unmanned missions would continue to be plagued with launch problems.

  • It's hard to send something into space, and NASA learned that over and over again.

  • But that's why they were unmanned missions: that's where the kinks were worked out.

  • Some of the twenty unmanned missions tested individual components,

  • like the escape system or the heat shields.

  • Others, especially later on in the project, were tests of whole missions

  • a kind of dry run before sending humans along for the ride.

  • There were also six manned missions in Project Mercury.

  • First came Mercury-Redstone 3, in May 1961, which made Alan Shepard the first American

  • to ever reach space.

  • He was also the first person to ever go to space and then land back on Earth inside the

  • capsule, since the two Soviet cosmonauts who had gone up earlier in 1961

  • both ejected from their ships and parachuted down to the ground.

  • The third mission was Mercury-Atlas 6, in February 1962.

  • It brought John Glenn into orbit, making him the first American,

  • and the third person in human history, to ever orbit the Earth.

  • You might have noticed that I skipped the second manned mission the one between Shepard's

  • and Glenn's flights.

  • That's because the second and fourth missions of Project Mercury had a very particular purpose:

  • they were duplicates of the previous missions.

  • So Mercury-Redstone 4, with Virgil Grissom on board,

  • was pretty much a carbon copy of Shepard's flight two months earlier.

  • And Mercury-Atlas 7, with Scott Carpenter on board,

  • was pretty much a carbon copy of Glenn's orbit.

  • Project Mercury had a lot of scientists working on it who knew that there's no use doing

  • something once if you can't prove that you can do it again.

  • And that turned out to be a good idea.

  • After Grissom became the second American in space,

  • his capsule landed in the Atlantic Ocean and pretty much sunk like a rock because the hatch

  • blew open.

  • He got out safely, but the capsule itself wasn't recovered from

  • the bottom of the ocean until almost forty years later, in 1999.

  • Now, Project Mercury could have stopped after Carpenter's orbits,

  • but it had two more manned missions to go: Mercury-Atlas 8 and Mercury-Atlas 9.

  • Each orbited for longer than the previous mission had,

  • with Mercury-Atlas 9 orbiting Earth for almost thirty-four hours.

  • This let NASA really nail down that second objective of Project Mercury, which was to

  • see what happened when humans were in low gravity for a long time.

  • They were especially interested in seeing if anything happened to the astronauts'

  • bodies or brains that would've made it hard to put together longer missions like the week-long

  • flight to the Moon that was already in the early planning stages.

  • And what they found was encouraging: being in space for a few days didn't seem

  • to affect an astronaut's health or brain very much.

  • Gordon Cooper, the astronaut on board, was just as good a pilot after a day and a half in space.

  • Project Mercury also taught NASA how to effectively put together a series of missions

  • that built on one another, and they learned how to train astronauts

  • so that they could succeed in their missions.

  • So not only did America's first manned space program get us to space

  • it set the stage for all our future space programs, too.

  • Now, even though we knew astronauts did pretty well in space,

  • we didn't actually have a way to get them to the Moon by the time Project Mercury finished.

  • The rockets for that program were awesome,

  • but they weren't powerful enough for missions beyond low-Earth orbit.

  • To get people to the Moon, we needed something bigger.

  • And thatsomethingwas the Saturn V rocket,

  • which was built by a team in one of my favorite towns ever, Huntsville, Alabama.

  • That team was led by German scientist Wernher von Braun, and while his story is important,

  • it's also a bit messy.

  • Let's just start with the uncomfortable fact that the American space program would not be what it is today

  • if it weren't for the contributions of a scientist

  • who was a former Nazi.

  • Wernher von Braun was an SS officer during World War II

  • and led a team of German scientists in developing the world's first long-range ballistic missile.

  • A military program aided in large part by slave labor at concentration camps.

  • And yet less than two decades later von Braun was leading a team of NASA scientists

  • in the design and development of the Saturn V rocket,

  • the vehicle that ultimately propelled more than a dozen Apollo astronauts to the moon.

  • Historians still debate whether he was

  • an apolitical scientist who had no choice but to work for Hitler

  • or a cunning opportunist who knowingly made a deal with the devil to pursue his research.

  • But what we do know is that he was a rocket science prodigy.

  • Upon earning his PhD in physics in 1934 at the age of 22,

  • he joined the German army as a civilian employee.

  • Younger than most of his colleagues von Braun led the team that began developing a long-range

  • ballistic missile.

  • Borrowing heavily from the work of an American rocket scientist, Robert Goddard, von Braun's

  • team built a rocket called the A4 later renamed the V2 or vengeance weapon.

  • The V2 was essentially a larger version of the liquid-fueled rockets built by Goddard,

  • though von Braun made changes to the engines that dramatically increased their power.

  • First he used alcohol instead of gasoline as the main propellant along with liquid oxygen.

  • The real power of his design came from two turbo pumps turbines that moved huge volumes

  • of fuel into the combustion chamber at high speeds

  • His turbo pumps could force 58 kilograms of alcohol and 72 kilograms of liquid oxygen

  • into the combustion chamber every second,

  • giving him the thrust of more than 25,000 kilograms, far more than Goddard had achieved.

  • Using this technology on October 3rd 1942,

  • von Braun's creation became the first man-made object to reach the threshold of space,

  • flying to an altitude of 80 kilometers,

  • The missile could travel more than 5,600 kilometers per hour and carry a 1000 kilogram warhead.

  • As military weapons go the V2 was terrifying but not always accurate.

  • While the Germans launched 5,000 of the missiles toward Western Europe,

  • only about 1,100 actually reached their targets.

  • Still the V2 was believed to have killed nearly 3000 people.

  • Now there's at least some evidence to suggest that von Braun's sympathy for the Nazi

  • cause only went so deep.

  • For one thing he was jailed briefly in 1944 after some Nazi spies infiltrated his program

  • and began to suspect that he wasn't loyal enough.

  • But more importantly for science, when the end of the war was in sight,

  • von Braun was ordered to destroy all work related to the V2,

  • but instead he hid his documents in an abandoned mine

  • and recovered them shortly before he and his team surrendered to the US Army.

  • As part of a carefully orchestrated mission known as Operation Paperclip.

  • Von Braun and his team were sent to the US where he demonstrated his weapon to the US

  • Army in New Mexico.

  • Later he was transferred to Huntsville Alabama and eventually became director of NASA's Marshall

  • Space Flight Center.

  • He was here that von Braun led the team that developed the Saturn V rocket,

  • the most famous of all the rockets.

  • While his V2 rocket was a pretty nifty piece of machinery the Saturn V was truly revolutionary.

  • 102 metres tall and it liftoff weighed more than a dozen 747s.

  • And as the world witnessed during the Apollo missions the Saturn 5 was not only incredibly

  • powerful it, divided the work of spaceflight into an elegant three-stage system.

  • The first of its three expendable stages produced 3.4 million kilograms of thrust making it

  • 130 times more powerful than the V2.

  • It had five separate F1 engines designed by von Braun's team so that the outer four engines

  • could move in order to control the direction of the rocket, while the center engine just

  • provided more thrust.

  • After lifting the whole thing to about 68 kilometers the first stage would separate

  • and the second stage would fire, carrying the spacecraft to the edge of orbit.

  • Once there the second stage would detach and a third stage pushed the craft into orbit

  • and then toward the moon.

  • Nearly half a century after they were first used, the five first stage engines that were

  • designed by von Braun's team are still the most powerful single chamber liquid-fueled

  • rockets ever made.

  • As for von Braun, he went on to rise through the ranks of NASA and worked for aerospace companies,

  • eventually being awarded the National Medal of Science not long before his death in 1977.

  • But he never truly escaped his past.

  • Whether you consider him a villain or a visionary or both, there still no disputing his legacy.

  • Von Braun turned the dreams of early 20th century rocket scientists into reality and

  • he did it in less than three decades.

  • Regardless of how it came to exist, the Saturn V was an amazing rocket.

  • But it wasn't the only piece of technology that had to be invented to send astronauts to the Moon.

  • Another big one was the navigation system.

  • Like you might guess, computers weren't all that advanced in the 1960s,

  • but astronauts needed them to navigate safely around the Moon.

  • Because I don't know about you, but I can't do orbital mechanics calculations off the top of my head

  • while also piloting a spacecraft.

  • The story of how NASA got those computers is impressive and kind of hilarious,

  • and it makes me thankful for how much engineering has grown in the last 50 years.

  • Here's another one from Hank.

  • Back in the 1960s and 70s, the Apollo missions blasted their way from Earth to the Moon.

  • And they carried two of the smallest most sophisticated guidance computers ever invented,

  • which were running on software knitted by little old ladies.

  • No, really.

  • The software running Apollo's guidance computers was literally woven, by hand, out of wires

  • and magnetic rings that looked like tiny donuts.

  • It was called Core Rope Memory.

  • The Apollo missions were a huge hurdle for both navigation and portable computing.

  • The orbital mechanics were complicated, and they needed guidance, especially while they

  • were on the far side of the Moon, unable to communicate with Earth.

  • Navigating there and back was a serious problemand NASA needed computers to solve it.

  • A team at MIT invented the navigation software to run on these computers.

  • Programmers wrote it from scratch and tested it on huge mainframe computers, using paper

  • punch cards to input the programs.

  • Running any given program could take an entire night.

  • And, of course, the software had to be bug free, because once the programs were loaded

  • onto the hardware of Apollo computers, they couldn't be changed.

  • So they had to be perfect.

  • Why couldn't they be changed?

  • Because the program was hardware, essentially.

  • There were a few different forms of storage that existed in the 1960s that could hold

  • a computer program.

  • One involved paper punch cards with holes in them, read in a giant reader.

  • There were also disk drives that were so big they had to be pushed on wheeled steel carts,

  • and magnetic tape on reels.

  • But these options were all way too heavy to fly into space.

  • Or, in engineer-speak: they weren't flight-weight.

  • Even if they were light enough to fly, they'd still need to be able to withstand the shock,

  • vibration and G-forces of launch, temperature changes, and cosmic radiation.

  • And if they couldn't withstand all that, the astronauts could die.

  • So, the memory storage had to be small, lightweight, safe, strong and robust enough that even if

  • you lost power, you didn't lose the program.

  • The only technology at the time that met these specs was core rope memory, which coded ones

  • and zeros, the fundamental language of programming, into wires and magnets.

  • It was woven on a type of loom, by threading individual wires through various holes with

  • large needles, kinda like knitting needles.

  • Engineers at the time called it LOL memory, a not-very-nice acronym forlittle old ladymemory,

  • because it took highly skilled garment workers, often older women, to weave it.

  • To represent a one, a seamstress wove a wire through a little magnetic donut called a core.

  • The donut acted like a transformer, a device that changes the voltage of an electrical

  • current running through it.

  • If the computer saw a voltage change at the other end of the wire, it assigned it the number one.

  • To get a zero, they weaved the wire outside of the core.

  • Electrical current through it wouldn't change.

  • The computer would interpret that lack of voltage change as a zero.

  • They'd weave the entire program out of wires going through or around cores.

  • There were lots of wires and donuts, which meant that Core Rope Memory was incredibly

  • hard to manufacture.

  • It came out looking a lot like a rope, but it was really a program made out of woven

  • electrical pathways.

  • It also provided the most storage per cubic centimeter at the time, the Apollo Guidance

  • Computer came with a whopping 36 kilobytes of memory.

  • This tiny microSD card has almost a million times that.

  • But core rope memory is Read Only Memory.

  • You can't write to it, which is really good if you don't want to accidentally record

  • the 1960s equivalent of a podcast over what would be steering you to the Moon.

  • But it also meant the programs had to be perfect the first time around.

  • When each core rope was finished, the program was run and compared with the program stored

  • on magnetic tape from MIT, they actually had a defense contractor build a machine to do

  • this automatically.

  • If they found a mistake, the program could be rewired before it left the factory, though

  • fixing it was an enormous pain.

  • So there's a lot more to knitting than scarf patterns: it can also take you to the moon and back.

  • The way NASA handled its computing challenge was really impressive.

  • But the reality is, at the end of the day, it's impossible to make space travel 100% foolproof.

  • No matter how much you invent, or how many precautions you take,

  • there's still a chance that something will go wrong.

  • And the U.S. got a firsthand look at that risk early on in the Apollo program, with Apollo 1.

  • Here is what happened.

  • If there's anything we've learned about space travel over the last 56 years,

  • it's that it's dangerous.

  • So space agencies like NASA do all they can to minimize the risks,

  • most importantly, the risks to astronauts' lives.

  • But learning how to deal with those risks has been an ongoing process.

  • And in some cases, NASA has had to learn from profound tragedy.

  • One of those tragedies was the Apollo 1 fire on January 27, 1967,

  • which claimed the lives of the three astronauts involved: Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee.

  • Both Congress and NASA immediately launched investigations, and what they learned changed

  • a lot about how we've approached spaceflight ever since.

  • The plan for the Apollo 1 mission was to test the command module, the capsule on a rocket

  • where the astronauts sit, in low Earth orbit.

  • Since eventually, NASA wanted to send that command module to the Moon.

  • The fire happened during a sort of rehearsal for the launch.

  • It was what's known as a “plugs-outtest, meaning that the rocket was unfueled,

  • and it didn't have the explosive bolts that would separate the different stages of the rocket in-flight.

  • Since there weren't as many explosives or any fuel around, NASA mission control thought

  • that the test would be safe.

  • Obviously, they were wrong.

  • After the astronauts got inside the capsule, it was filled with 100% oxygen gas at 115

  • kilopascals, which is about 15% higher than standard air pressure at sea level.

  • There was an electrical failure during the test, and the resulting spark caused the fire.

  • The pure oxygen atmosphere was completely consumed within thirty seconds, and the astronauts

  • couldn't open the hatch to escape.

  • Meanwhile, the smoke billowing out of the command module kept the launchpad personnel

  • from being able to rescue the astronauts, because there were no smoke masks at the launchpad.

  • The investigations into the fire found that several factors, both on an engineering level

  • and on an organizational level, contributed to the tragedy.

  • NASA implemented every suggestion made by the investigation committees, leading to major

  • changes that have made spaceflight much safer, even though it is still dangerous.

  • One of the biggest engineering-related changes they made

  • was to the gases they used to fill the capsule.

  • The first problem was the fact that they used pure oxygen,

  • which was meant to make the capsule lighter, so it would take less fuel to launch.

  • Plus, breathing pure oxygen would get rid of the nitrogen in the astronauts' bloodstreams,

  • which meant that they wouldn't have to worry about nitrogen bubbles forming in their blood

  • during the launch and causing the bends.

  • But oxygen is really flammable, it's basically what fire runs on.

  • You don't want pure oxygen near any kind of spark, and you definitely don't want

  • it anywhere that a fire could be fatal.

  • The other issue was that the pressure inside the capsule was higher than the pressure outside,

  • and the fire just made that worse.

  • The hatch opened inward, and the extra pressure inside meant that the astronauts couldn't open it.

  • That's why, ever since, instead of using a high-pressure, entirely oxygen atmosphere,

  • NASA has used a mix of gases at standard atmospheric pressure.

  • For the rest of the Apollo missions,

  • the atmosphere inside the capsule during the launch was made up of 60% oxygen and 40% nitrogen,

  • while the astronauts breathed pure oxygen inside their spacesuits.

  • It was still a higher oxygen concentration than Earth's atmosphere,

  • but it was low enough that a fire wouldn't spread too rapidly for astronauts to escape.

  • NASA made another major engineering change, too: they started constructing the command module,

  • and astronauts' suits, entirely out of non-flammable materials.

  • This way, any electrical spark would have nothing to catch on.

  • And to make sure the materials they used were up to scratch, the command module was tested

  • to make sure that it would be safe in a fire.

  • But NASA changed more than just the gases and materials they used.

  • They also overhauled their safety procedures and attitude toward spaceflight as a whole.

  • The tragedy was a huge wakeup call for NASA.

  • They realized that, as an organization, they were so focused on beating the Soviet Union

  • in the space race that they'd become somewhatcavalierabout safety.

  • Before the fire, for example, there were no fire safety procedures in place, and they

  • only had minimal firefighting equipment at the launchpad.

  • The command module hadn't been tested in simulations to see if it met any safety standards,

  • and when the test was underway, there were no emergency staff present, like EMTs or firefighters.

  • So NASA implemented a whole series of changes to fix every one of those problems, and resolved

  • to be a lot more cautious in general.

  • In the words of Gene Kranz, who led Mission Control for the Apollo program:

  • We will never again compromise our responsibilities.

  • Mission Control will be perfect.”

  • Apollo 1 marked a huge turning point for NASA,

  • which we'll talk more about in our special episode celebrating the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11.

  • Obviously, we wish it had never happened, and it was a huge tragedy.

  • But we did learn from it, and those lessons helped us finally succeed.

  • From rockets to computers to astronaut tests, it took a lot to land the first humans on the Moon.

  • And when we did, it was a huge moment of celebration.

  • Here's Hank with one more episode, which, coincidentally,

  • we made for the forty-fifth anniversary of Apollo 11.

  • Discovery number 1: there is no life on the moon.

  • Remember this is 1969 we're talking about.

  • We'd never been anywhere else but earth, so we truly had no idea of what awaited us.

  • And we didn't even know for sometime after the Apollo crew returned home.

  • When Armstrong, Aldrin, and their pilot Michael Collins splashed back down in the Pacific Ocean,

  • NASA made sure they didn't bring back any tiny hitchhikers with them.

  • They were bathed in a solution of sodium hypochlorite and then quarantined for 21 days.

  • Their command module was sanitized and the raft with all the cleanup supplies was intentionally

  • sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

  • But after extensive testing of the soil and rock samples the astronauts brought back,

  • it turned out that there was no sign of life.

  • Materials were totally inorganic and at the time it seemed like there was not even any water.

  • Actually though there was water.

  • Scientists assumed that the traces of water they detected in the samples were the result

  • of contamination because there was so little of it and because they didn't find any minerals

  • that form in the presence of water.

  • Well we now know that there is a trace amount of water.

  • We remain fairly sure that there's no life on the moon.

  • Number 2: the moon is more like Earth than we thought.

  • Before Apollo 11 we had no idea what the moon even was.

  • Was it a chunk of space rock that had been captured by Earth's gravity like Mars's moons

  • are or was it a piece of the earth that had broken off?

  • We're still not totally sure, but we've learned how to read the clues thanks to Buzz and Neil.

  • Among the equipment they planted on the moon was a seismometer which measured and transmitted

  • data back to earth about moon quakes.

  • By studying the seismic waves from these quakes at various depths

  • we found out that the moon has layers

  • Much like earth, there was a crust, a mantle, and a core composed of materials much like Earth's,

  • only depleted in iron.

  • And the rocks and dirt that Apollo crew brought back also told us about the moon's geologic history.

  • Namely the samples showed that moon rocks share the same distinct ratios of oxygen isotopes

  • as Earth rocks, suggesting they have a common origin.

  • So thanks to Apollo 11, we now have the giant impact theory.

  • A model that suggests 4.5 billion years ago a giant body collided with earth and broke

  • off the chunk that became the moon.

  • And it's hard not to love number 3: Einstein, as he so often is, was right.

  • Early in the twentieth century Albert Einstein proposed the Strong Equivalence principle.

  • This posited in very basic terms that all forms of matter accelerated at the same rate

  • in response to gravity.

  • So by extension, even though they're very different sizes and compositions, both earth

  • and the moon would be drawn toward the Sun at the same rate.

  • To prove this Einstein calculated the exact orbit of the moon.

  • But from Earth we weren't able to measure it precisely enough.

  • Then Apollo 11 installed the lunar laser ranging array, a panel of 100 small mirrors.

  • By aiming a laser from Earth at this array and recording the time it took to reflect

  • back, astronomers were able to measure for the first time the exact distance between

  • the Earth and the moon.

  • It turned out the moon's orbit was the same shape and size predicted by Einstein to within

  • one millimeter.

  • And to this day we still use that array to study the moon's orbit.

  • And finally, maybe the most inspiring thing that Apollo 11 taught us was just we can do it.

  • In a technological sense, we were never sure that we could send humans to another planetary

  • body, until we just did it.

  • To do it we have to invent things like the first computer to use large scale integrated

  • circuits or chips.

  • We had to develop a renewable efficient fuel source known as the fuel cell.

  • And I'm not even talking about heat shields and dehydrated foods and cordless tools and

  • any of the other countless patentable inventions that went into that historic mission.

  • Thanks for joining us for this Apollo-themed compilation!

  • If you want to keep celebrating with us, you can watch our extra special episode tomorrow

  • when it debuts on the main SciShow channel.

  • You can check it out over at youtube.com/scishow.

  • And for more space content year-round,

  • you can subscribe to this channel at youtube.com/scishowspace,

  • or by clicking the button below.

  • [ ♪ Outro ]

[ ♪ Intro ]

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it