Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Voiceover: Any sequence you can come up with,

  • whatever pattern looks fun.

  • All your favorite celebrities birthdays lead into end

  • followed by random numbers, whatever.

  • All of that plus every sequence you can't come up with,

  • each of those are the decimal places

  • of a badly named so called real number

  • and any of those sequences

  • with one random digit changed

  • is another real number.

  • That's the thing most people don't realize

  • about the set of all real numbers.

  • It includes every possible combination of digits

  • extending infinitely among aleph null decimal places.

  • There's no last digit.

  • The number of digits is greater than any real number,

  • any counting number

  • which makes it an infinite number of digits.

  • Just barely an infinite number of digits

  • because it's only barely greater

  • than any finite number

  • but even though it's only the smallest possible

  • infinity of digits.

  • This infinity is still no joke.

  • It's still big enough, that for example

  • point nine repeating is exactly precisely one

  • and not epsilon less.

  • You don't get that kind of point nine repeating

  • equals one action

  • unless your infinity really is infinite.

  • You may have heard that some infinities

  • are bigger than other infinities.

  • This is metaphorically resonant and all

  • but whether infinity really exists

  • or if anything can last forever

  • or whether a life contains infinite moments.

  • Those aren't the kind of questions

  • you can answer with math

  • but if life does contain infinite moments,

  • one for each real number time,

  • that you can do math to.

  • This time, we're not just going to do metaphors.

  • We're going to prove it.

  • Understanding different infinities

  • starts with some really basic questions

  • like is five bigger than four.

  • You learned that it is

  • but how do you know?

  • Because this many is more than this many,

  • they're both just one hand equal to each other

  • except to fold it into slightly different shapes.

  • Unless you're already abstracting out

  • the idea of numbers and how you learn

  • they're suppose to work

  • just as you learned a long life

  • is supposed to be somehow more than a short life

  • rather than just a life equal to any other

  • but folded into a different shape.

  • Yeah, metaphorically resonate that.

  • Is five and six bigger than 12?

  • Five and six is two things after all

  • and twelve is just one thing and what about infinity?

  • If I want to make up a number bigger than infinity,

  • how would I know whether it really is bigger

  • and not just the same infinity

  • folded into a different shape?

  • The way five plus five

  • is just another shape for 10.

  • One way to make a big number

  • is to take a number of numbers, meta numbers.

  • This is where a box containing five and six

  • has two things and is actually bigger than a box

  • with only the number 12.

  • You could take the number of numbers from one to five

  • and put them in a box

  • and you'd have a box set of five

  • or you could take the number of numbers

  • that are five which is one

  • or you could take the number of counting numbers

  • or the number of real numbers.

  • It's kind of funny that the number of counting numbers

  • is not itself a counting number

  • but an infinite number often referred to

  • as aleph null.

  • This size of infinity is usually called countable infinity

  • because it's like counting infinitely

  • but I like James Grime's way of calling it

  • listable infinity because the usual counting numbers

  • basically make an infinite list

  • and many other numbers of numbers are also listable.

  • You can put all positive whole numbers

  • on an infinite list like this.

  • You can put all whole numbers including negative ones

  • by alternating.

  • You can list all whole numbers

  • along with all half way points between them.

  • You can even list all the rational numbers

  • by cleverly going through all possible combinations

  • of one whole number divided by another whole number.

  • All countably infinite numbers of things,

  • all aleph null.

  • Countable infinity is like saying

  • if I make an infinite list of these things,

  • I can list all the things.

  • The weird thing is that it seems like this definition

  • should be obvious that no matter how many things there are,

  • of course you can list all of them.

  • If your list is literally infinite

  • but nope so back to the reals.

  • Say you want to list all the real numbers.

  • If you did, it could start something like this

  • but the specifics don't matter

  • because we're about to prove

  • that there's too many real numbers to fit

  • even on an infinite list

  • no matter how clever you are at list finding.

  • What matters is the idea that you can create

  • any real number you want,

  • out of an infinite sequence of digits

  • and we're going to use this power to create a number

  • that couldn't possibly be on the list

  • no matter what the list is

  • even though the list is infinite.

  • All we need to do that is construct a real number

  • that isn't the first number on the list

  • and isn't the second number on the list

  • and isn't any number on the list

  • no matter what the list is.

  • Here's where I'm sure some of you are like "Yes!"

  • Cantor's diagonal proof.

  • Indeed my friends, that's what's going down.

  • In the first number on the list,

  • the first digit is one.

  • If I make a new number with a first digit is three

  • then even the rest of the digits are the same,

  • there's no way my new number

  • is equal to the first number on the list

  • though the rest of the digits

  • probably aren't all the same anyway.

  • The second number on the list does start with a three.

  • We don't know if this new number is the same or not yet

  • but I can make sure my new constructed number

  • is not the second number on the list

  • by making the second digit five

  • or eight or whatever

  • and I can make my number not be the third number

  • on the list

  • by making the third digit five

  • instead of three again.

  • I mean the new number was already different

  • from the third number on the list

  • but I don't even have to check the other digits

  • as long as I know that one of them

  • definitely conflicts which comes in handy

  • when I get to the 20 billion and oneth

  • number on the list

  • and I don't have to check the first 20 billion digits

  • against the 20 billion digits

  • I've constructed so far to be sure

  • that my new number is not the same

  • as the 20 billion and oneth number.

  • There's one digit in my number

  • for every number on the list

  • which means I can make a way for my new number

  • to not match every single number on the list

  • no matter what the list is.

  • Which means there's more real numbers than fit

  • on an infinite list.

  • This works no matter what the list is.

  • Take the diagonal and add two to every digit

  • or add five or whatever.

  • You can't actually sit down and write an infinite list

  • or infinite number though.

  • Here's another way to think about what's really going on.

  • We're trying to create a function that maps

  • one set of numbers to another.

  • You can map all the counting numbers

  • to all the whole numbers with a simple

  • minus one function or to all the even numbers

  • with a times two function

  • and map all the even numbers back

  • to all the counting numbers with the inverse function

  • division by two.

  • You can map all the real numbers between zero and one

  • to all the real numbers between zero and 10

  • by doing a times 10 function

  • and find every number has a place to go,

  • they match one to one.

  • The question is, is there a function

  • that maps every real number

  • or even just the real numbers between zero and one

  • to a unique counting number and vice versa.

  • Cantor's diagonal proof shows that any function

  • that claims to math counting numbers

  • and reals to each other must fail somewhere.

  • In fact you're not just missing one more real number

  • than fits on an infinite list

  • or else you could just add it to the beginning.

  • There's not just another infinite list

  • of numbers you're missing

  • or else you could zipper the lists together.

  • You could take every digit on the diagonal

  • and add either two or four

  • to get infinite combinations of numbers

  • that aren't on the list

  • and you can make a function that maps

  • those missing numbers to the real numbers in binary.

  • Of course the binary numbers

  • are just another way of writing the reals

  • which means an infinite list of real numbers

  • will quite literally be missing all of them.

  • Next to the infinity of the reals,

  • the infinity of infinite list

  • is actually mathematically nothing which is nuts

  • because countable infinity is still super huge,

  • it's infinite.

  • The infinity of the reals is beyond

  • that what can we indicated with a simple dot, dot, dot,

  • a bigger infinity, a greater cardinal number.

  • We've gone beyond aleph null.

  • This is aleph one maybe.

  • Yeah funny thing that turns out

  • there's no way to tell how much bigger this infinity is

  • than aleph null.

  • Just that it's bigger like it could be the next step up

  • or there might be other sorts of infinites in between

  • but which one of those is the case?

  • It's kind of independent of standard axioms.

  • Awkward.

  • But whatever it is,

  • those are just two relatively small infinities

  • out of an infinite number of aleph numbers.

  • For every aleph number, there's infinite ordinal numbers

  • which I guess kind of are like

  • infinities folded into different shapes

  • and don't forget hyper real supernaturals,

  • or reals, etcetera.

  • I guess you could squeeze some Beth numbers in there

  • if you're into those axioms.

  • I don't judge.

  • Some of my best friends use the axiom of choice.

  • Anyway, some infinities are bigger than other infinities

  • but a mathematician would probably say

  • something more like I don't know,

  • there exists an aleph alpha

  • and aleph beta where aleph alpha

  • is greater than aleph beta or something

  • which is perfectly true.

  • Whether those different sorts of infinities

  • apply to something like moments of time is unknown.

  • What we do know is that if life has infinite moments

  • or infinite love or infinite being

  • then a life twice as long

  • still has exactly the same amount.

  • Some infinities only look bigger than other infinities

  • and some infinities that seem very small

  • are worth just as much as infinities 10 times their size.

Voiceover: Any sequence you can come up with,

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it