Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • [♪ INTRO]

  • Earthquakes are a reminder that there's way more

  • going on under our feet than you might think.

  • But it's hard to know exactly what it's like inside our planet

  • since we can't just, like, dig a big hole and look.

  • On the bright side, earthquakes themselves give us a way to sort of see inside the Earth,

  • because the properties of seismic waves say a lot about the materials they pass through.

  • And that's not just the case for Earth!

  • We've detected seismic activity all around the solar system,

  • moonquakes, marsquakes, venusquakes,

  • and we can use those tremors to learn about the interiors of those places, too.

  • But the most dramatic quakes we know of actually happen on stars.

  • Certain types of stars can have quakes a lot like planets,

  • and they can give us rare clues about what it's like inside those stars.

  • On top of that, starquakes may be behind at least 3 unsolved mysteries of the universe.

  • The fact that starquakes happen at all might sound weird,

  • since stars are just balls of gas and plasma.

  • They don't exactly have tectonic plates or a solid crust to rattle around.

  • Except, waves of energy can roll through some stars, a lot like seismic waves.

  • And certain stars actually do form a sort of crust.

  • Neutron stars are basically a giant ball of neutrons,

  • and their gravity is so intense that it forces the surface material into a solid, rigid crust.

  • Beneath that crust there's a wobbly layer of what's called nuclear pasta,

  • which may be the most elastic and robust material in the universe;

  • and that's the real name for it.

  • So these features of neutron stars are weirdly analogous to the Earth's crust and mantle:

  • There is a slightly squishier, more mobile layer underneath a relatively brittle one.

  • Which means that the basic principles that drive earthquakes

  • should also work on a neutron star!

  • And that just might help explain something astronomers so far have no explanation for.

  • Fast radio bursts, or FRBs, are short pulses of radio waves

  • that seem to be tied to neutron stars.

  • Sometimes, we randomly see these pulses in one location

  • and they never come back, but on rare occasions,

  • we've also detected repeaters: FRBs that come from the same source more than once.

  • And that's awesome: More bursts means more data.

  • One repeating FRB in particular is giving us some especially intriguing data.

  • We've detected around 300 bursts from this one source over eight years,

  • and when you put together a plot with all of the different energies from those bursts,

  • it looks a lot like the distribution of energies associated with earthquakes in one area.

  • Even the timing looks familiar;

  • the timing between bursts looks like the timing you'd see

  • between an earthquake and its aftershocks.

  • So, this thing is looking suspiciously earthquake-y.

  • At this point, we don't have enough data to say for sure that this FRB is caused

  • by a neutron star with starquakes, let alone that all FRBs are produced this way.

  • But it gives astronomers a promising direction to explore.

  • And that is not the only mystery they're investigating in neutron stars.

  • Certain spinning neutron stars, called pulsars, have occasional, unexplained glitches.

  • Pulsars get their name because they appear to pulse:

  • As they spin around, electromagnetic jets shooting out from their poles

  • come in and out of our line of sight.

  • Since their rotation rate is essentially constant,

  • those bursts of radiation are spaced super evenly.

  • If we were to see any change in their timing, we'd expect a gradual slowing down,

  • because those jets carry energy out of the system,

  • so there's less energy remaining to keep up that rotation speed.

  • So imagine astronomers' surprise when they saw pulsars that briefly started flashing faster.

  • That's a pulsar glitch.

  • A glitch because it's not supposed to happen, unless there is more to this story.

  • And that's how astronomers began to wonder if starquakes were involved.

  • See, as quakes rattle through a star, its insides get all disheveled,

  • and its mass slightly redistributes itself.

  • When that happens, the center of mass moves.

  • And if the center of mass of a rotating object moves closer to the axis of rotation,

  • it's gonna spin faster just like an ice skater.

  • Try it for yourself in your swivelly desk chair!

  • Start spinning around, and then pull your arms and legs in, and get real dizzy.

  • So that's exactly what some astronomers think is happening in pulsars.

  • They think quakes are moving the center of mass and making these stars spin faster.

  • Like with FRBs, this is not confirmed, so scientists will keep looking into it.

  • In the meantime, asteroseismologists have their hands full with another mystery:

  • something called the Blazhko effect.

  • Got lots of good names in today's episode.

  • The Blazhko effect happens in a type of variable star called RR Lyraes,

  • whose brightness goes up and down on a regular cycle.

  • And the star that gave the group its name, RR Lyrae,

  • is one of the best known examples of the effect.

  • RR Lyrae's brightness goes up and down, with regular peaks and troughs,

  • about once every 13 and a half hours.

  • That happens thanks to waves of hot, charged gas moving through it.

  • But if you look at those brightness oscillations over a very long period of time,

  • you will notice that the peaks themselves rise and fall.

  • That is the Blazhko effect. And we don't really know how it happens,

  • but something seismic might be at play here.

  • RR Lyrae stars don't have a crust like neutron stars do,

  • so they don't have the same kind of starquakes,

  • but seismic waves could still be shaking things up.

  • For instance, if the waves of heated gas

  • move through different layers of the star at different rates,

  • they could periodically line up in a way that might amplify peaks.

  • And that could potentially account for that second cycle of peaks and troughs

  • that no one knows how to explain.

  • And even though none of these mysteries are solved,

  • they all show us that shaking up a star is a good way to learn about it,

  • and that starquakes hold a surprising number of clues

  • to the internal workings of celestial objects.

  • Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow!

  • And a special thanks to our patrons, who make these episodes possible.

  • So if you're feeling like thanking us, thanking our writers, thanking our team,

  • do that, but also thank our Patrons.

  • And if you like what we're doing here, you can become one of those people,

  • and join us on Patreon to help make science education free on the internet for everybody.

  • For more information, head on over to patreon.com/SciShow.

  • [♪ OUTRO]

[♪ INTRO]

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it