Subtitles section Play video
All that it is currently known about the universe and its origin turns out to be
wrong. This is part one of the theory of everything, where proof against the big
bang theory or expanding universe is discussed.
The only requirement for understanding the following material is the ability to
measure the size of objects.
Without initially going into details of the underlying theories, the new model and
big bang theory can be tested by measuring the size of clusters.
A cluster is a group of galaxies usually embedded with large amounts of hot
x-ray emitting gas.
By measuring what is known as the redshift of these clusters the distance
and size of each can be determined.
Clusters however are not all the same.
The larger varieties have diameters ranging from five to twenty million
light years.
The average diameter is ten point six million light years.
This expected range can be plugged into both models providing a plot of apparent
size verses distance from Earth.
The blue lines are from the modified big bang theory.
The red lines of from the new model, which is part of the theory of everything.
After adding 148 clusters as measured by how large they appear from earth,
the big bang theory is up to fifteen thousand percent off.
The new model is however an agreement with the apparent size of these objects.
The previous disagreement with the big bang theory is commonly blamed on large
amounts of mergers. This is not actually observed.
To rule out any change in the actual size of clusters, distant blue galaxies can be
compared to local ones. It is known that the properties of these galaxies do not
drastically change with distance. For example, brightness and color are nearly
equivalent between the local and distant blue galaxies.
Instead of seeing how large each galaxy appears from Earth, the actual sizes of
local ones are plotted.
The horizontal axis shows how bright each galaxy is in the blue band.
The vertical axis provides their actual size. The distant galaxies can be plotted
relative to the big bang theory. Due to the way these galaxies are selected in surveys,
the blue data points to the right more distant.
After plotting predictions from the new model in red, the distant galaxies are in
agreement with local ones. The big bang theory is off by upwards of 300%
relative to the size of distant blue galaxies.
Since the redshift of these galaxies is also known, it is possible to compare
them to the apparent size of clusters.
With the curvature of the universe confirmed up to 0.7z, an expanding universe
can be conclusively ruled out.
The big bang theory states of the universe began from an initial
singularity, which further expanded into the current universe. The redshift of
distant galaxies and clusters therefore arise from relative motion.
The new model instead states that the inferred expansion is an illusion due to
being in an asymptotically flat universe.
These are only technical words for saying that the universe is localized
similar to the solar system or a galaxy. The correct model requires for the
bending of light due to gravity to be understood.
The red line represents a ray of light initially on a straight path.
As it enters the gravitational field the path begins to deflect towards the center.
The universe only provides a larger example of this
If an observer on earth were looking towards the shortest path to the center
of the universe, the path would move in a straight line. If the observer went to a
different location and looked towards the sky, the light reaching them what instead
curve through space.
The deflection of light within the universe therefore provides the illusion
of nearly spherical accelerated expansion. The relative motion of distant
galaxies and resulting redshift arises from gravity alone.
The cosmic background radiation or black body spectrum of the central core is
also observed in all directions of space.
The resulting dipole moment is due to the solar system's relative motion.
The next video will discuss details of an always existing universe, the cosmic
background radiation and additional evidence against the big bang theory.