Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Language and the Way We Save

  • Transcription of interview with Keith Chen on September 3, 2012.

  • Douglas Goldstein, CFP®, Financial Planner & Investment Advisor

  • Keith Chen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the Yale School of Management. He specializes

  • in behavioral economics and has covered a great deal of diverse topics, from economics

  • to psychology and biology. He has looked at how ex-prisoners would have looked different

  • if their conditions in prison would have been different.

  • Douglas Goldstein, financial planner & investment advisor, interviewed Chen on Arutz Sheva Radio.

  • Douglas Goldstein: Your newer research is related to language. Youve spoken about

  • how some languages have a concept of the future and some don’t. What’s that all about?

  • Keith Chen: As a behavioral economist, one of the things that I work on most and study

  • is how people make decisions when those decisions involve critically aspects of time. How do

  • you like muster the will to save for retirement? How do you muster the will to wake up early

  • in the morning and exercise, and how do you muster the will to quit smoking? All of these

  • decisions basically feel like savings to an economist, and that’s because they all fundamentally

  • involve this idea that you have to endure some pain in the present in order to gain

  • pleasure and benefit in the future.

  • Douglas Goldstein: How does that relate then to the language that people use?

  • Keith Chen: The interesting thing that I started to notice was that when you look across countries

  • in the world, first of all, there’s vastly different savings. There’s vastly different

  • kind of tendencies of people to be able to sacrifice in the present in exchange for the

  • future. There’s a lot of different factors going on. There are obviously strong cultural

  • factors. There’s kind of experiences with depression and hyperinflation and all those

  • kinds of things, but a factor that stood out to me that economists had not thought a lot

  • about was differences in how your language forces you to talk about the future.

  • I was talking with some colleagues who are linguists and I was reading up on some of

  • the interesting work that they do, and I realized that in fact actually about 10% of world languages

  • interestingly enough have no systematic future tense in some sense. It’s a minority of

  • languages in the world, but there are some very notable examples, like Chinese and Finnish,

  • and languages like that that basically force their speakers to talk about the future as

  • if it were the present, to speak about the future in exactly the same way that they talk

  • about the present.

  • The interesting thing is that even though many of these languages are outliers in the

  • world in terms of how they talk about the future, almost all of those countries are

  • also outliers in terms of how much they save. They save tremendous amounts, and what I began

  • to wonder was if your language treats the future exactly the same way that it treats

  • the present, does that make the future feel more like the present, and does that make

  • it easier

  • to save?

  • In some sense, when youre saving, your present self has to feel pain and your future self

  • gets to bear the fruit, and you see the rewards of that. In some sense, if your future self

  • feels more like your present self, if in fact you talk about these two people in the same

  • way, then that should make that activity easier.

  • Douglas Goldstein: This sounds like a very useful lesson. What can people do to adapt

  • this way of thinking within their own language?

  • Keith Chen: Since I’ve started this project, it’s actually interesting. If you look at

  • both financial advice and also personal goal advice, I’m not advocating this and I’m

  • not saying you should go out and do this, but many people who do get advice about how

  • people should be able to set goals that they can follow through actually advocate writing

  • down a list of goals and writing them down in the present tense. They say that this is

  • a more effective way of visualizing yourself achieving these things. There are examples

  • of this in Hebrew as well but you actually see oftentimes people trying to shift their

  • own or listenersperceptions of time by systematically and suddenly changing tenses.

  • For example, linguists call this the historical present. Oftentimes when you hear people talking

  • about past events, if they want to make them feel more present or feel more vivid, theyll

  • talk about them in the present tense. Youll hear someone recounting a story, “I see

  • my friend walking down the street and I say to him,” and obviously, youre not indicating

  • that that’s happening right now.

  • Douglas Goldstein: How people can visualize the future? Are there other ways that people can really bring you closer to home?

  • Keith Chen: The main takeaway from a lot of my research is that people whose language

  • has suddenly encouraged them to disassociate the future from the present have a very difficult

  • time saving, but there are many ways that people in their own lives can try and emphasize

  • to themselves that theyre not toiling for no good reason like this. This all has future

  • rewards and future payoffs.

  • A colleague of mine at the University of Pennsylvania ran this fascinating study where he got a

  • company to agree to send digital photos from the company directory to him, and then he

  • just applied some very standard now software where you can digitally age people’s photos.

  • You basically take these smiling photos, headshots of people, and digitally age them to look

  • like theyre 65. What he had the company do is randomly on half of their employees

  • retirement forms put a smiling picture of you at age 65 on the form that asks you how

  • much would you like to put away for retirement, and on the other half of the forms, just put

  • a standard picture, the smiling picture of you unaltered, to see what the effect was.

  • What he found was these pictures of a 65-year-old you dramatically increased people’s willingness

  • to put aside large shares of their current wages into their retirement accounts whereas

  • pictures of just the smiling them don’t. I think the lesson here is habit of mind that

  • encourages you to remember that the retired you is you, and that you really care about

  • that person, can go a long way to helping you overcome problems with savings.

  • I think that’s probably why you see a lot of financial planners try and systematically

  • talk with people about their future plans, make very visceral and real what you want

  • to be doing 10, 20 or 30 years from now. If you can make that very real, then that makes

  • it a lot easier to sacrifice.

  • Douglas Goldstein: Can you just tell us what are some other aspects of this research that

  • we can look forward to?

  • Keith Chen: Directions that I’m taking this research now, and I actually think they may

  • be more exciting than some effects that I’m finding on savings - it turns out these language

  • effects are also very big on other dimensions. Were looking at the ability to quit smoking.

  • I actually have some new projects that are looking at safe sex behavior even in a developing

  • country setting. More broadly though, where this research really is heading right now

  • is in the direction of just really trying to help tease out those subtle drivers of

  • our own savings behavior. Hopefully, in the future, once we really understand all of the

  • ways and all of the subtle influences that impact on people making these decisions, hopefully

  • were going to be able to use that research to help make people better stewards of their

  • own futures.

  • Douglas Goldstein: How can people follow your work?

  • Keith Chen: You can always find my website at Yale. If you just GoogleKeith Chen,”

  • I’m usually the first link, orKeith Chen economistorKeith Chen Yale,”

  • you can come and check out the work.

  • Douglas Goldstein, CFP®, is the director of Profile Investment Services and the host

  • of the Goldstein on Gelt radio show (Monday nights at 7:00 PM on www.israelnationalradio.com.

  • He is a licensed financial professional both in the U.S. and Israel. Securities offered

  • through Portfolio Resources Group, Inc., Member FINRA, SIPC, MSRB, NFA, SIFMA. Accounts carried

  • by National Financial Services LLC. Member NYSE/SIPC, a Fidelity Investments company.

  • His book Building Wealth in Israel is available in bookstores, on the web, or can be ordered

  • at: www.profile-financial.com (02) 624-2788 or (03) 524-0942.

  • Disclaimer: This document is a transcription and/or an educational article. While it is

  • believed to be current and accurate, divergence from the original is to be expected. The original

  • podcast can be heard at https://sites.google.com/site/goldsteinradioshows/. All information on this website is purely

  • information and should not be used as the sole basis for making financial decisions.

  • The opinions rendered herein are those of the guests, and not necessarily those of Douglas

  • Goldstein, Profile Investment Services, Ltd., or Israel National News. Readers should consult

  • with a professional financial advisor before making any financial decisions. Please see

  • the complete disclaimer at https://sites.google.com/site/goldsteinradioshows/.

Language and the Way We Save

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it