Subtitles section Play video
You and I belong to the only group of hominins on the planet today.
We're the lone twig left on our branch of the family tree.
But we weren't always alone.
100,000 years ago, Eurasia was home to other hominin species, some of which we know our
ancestors met, and spent some quality time with.
Some of them we've known about for a while, like the Neanderthals, whose fossils we've
been digging up since the 1800s.
But some of them are more recent additions to the family tree, like the Denisovans, who
who we may, on this channel, have called Denis-ovans but we have been informed
that it's De-nis-o-vans
The Denisovans were discovered almost by accident in 2008, and we know them from only a few fossil bones
and from the DNA of their living descendants.
That surprising discovery has opened our eyes to the fact that our ancestors met, and even
mated with, other hominins.
So now, anthropologists are following the genetic traces of these ancient interbreeding
events -- traces that many of us carry with us today.
Thanks to this research, we're starting to better understand how and even where modern
humans paired up with other hominins, giving us a more complete picture of the history
of our species.
And we're starting to tackle some really exciting questions, like: What's our inheritance
from that time when we met up with other human species?
And why are we the only ones left today?
As we get closer to answering those questions, we're starting to see that maybe part of
our success as a species has to do with those other hominins that we encountered in our
travels around the planet.
Neanderthals lived throughout Europe, and from southwestern to central Asia.
We've found their fossils from Portugal and the UK in the west all the way to the
Altai Mountains of Siberia in the east, and down into Israel in the south.
The oldest Neanderthal-like fossils come from a site in northern Spain called the “Sima
de los Huesos” - literally, the Pit of the Bones - dated to about 450,000 years ago,
while the most recent come from a handful of sites across western Europe that date to
around 40,000 years ago.
Anatomically, the Neanderthals were very much like us, with a few differences.
They were relatively short and stocky, with robust limbs, and big brains.
They had heavy brow ridges, large noses, and braincases with more of an oval shape than
the round ones of Homo sapiens.
And we know they weren't just dumb cavemen.
They controlled fire, created stone tools and spears, made jewelry from eagle talons,
and cared for injured members of their groups.
And our ancestors clearly recognized them as being like us -- enough so that we interbred
with them!
We know this because researchers have sequenced the Neanderthal nuclear genome, originally
in 2010, from bone fragments found in a cave in Croatia.
And by comparing that genome to those of modern humans from many different populations, we
can find out how much Neanderthal DNA some of us still carry.
Although original estimates were around 4%, more recent studies have suggested that living
people of European and East Asian descent have between 1 to 2% Neanderthal DNA in their
genes.
Meanwhile, people native to Sub-Saharan Africa don't have any Neanderthal DNA, indicating
that their ancestors never encountered Neanderthals.
And as we find more fossils to sample, we can tell that these interbreeding encounters
happened more than once.
And our genomes can even shed light on when they happened.
For example, genetic material extracted from the left femur of a modern human male who
lived in Siberia about 45,000 years ago has been found to contain Neanderthal DNA.
And researchers were able to measure how long the Neanderthal segments of his genome were,
compared to the same segments in living people.
It turned out that his Neanderthal sections were longer than modern humans', suggesting
that he wasn't that many generations removed from his Neanderthal ancestor.
In fact, the researchers were able to estimate that this Siberian man was the product of
an interbreeding event between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens that occurred 50,000 to 60,000
years ago -- just 10,000 years before he was born, give or take a few thousand years.
And this was likely when modern humans migrating out of Africa encountered Neanderthals in
the Middle East.
Likewise, a 40,000-year-old jawbone was found in Romania in 2002, which provided some of
the earliest evidence of modern humans in Europe.
And it was found to have some anatomical similarities to Neanderthals.
When its genome was sequenced over a decade later, that human was found to have had a
Neanderthal ancestor only some four to six generations back.
Between 6 and 9% of its genome was Neanderthal!
So, using fossils like these, researchers have been able to determine that Homo sapiens
bred with Neanderthals several times in different places.
But how did all of this interbreeding change us?
Well, sometimes, not very much.
The genome from the Romanian jaw bone suggested that population didn't contribute much to
the DNA of living modern humans.
But sometimes, these encounters had a big impact.
For example, two genes that play important roles in our immune response seem to have
passed from Neanderthals to people of Eurasian descent.
One of these genes, known as STAT2, is part of our immune system's signaling response
when we get a viral infection.
And we know that the Eurasian version of STAT2 came from Neanderthals, because it isn't
found in sub-Saharan Africans.
Plus, molecular-clock studies have found that the Neanderthal version of this gene appeared
in the Eurasian genome long after the evolutionary split between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals
- so it must've come from interbreeding.
Meanwhile, members of many East Asian populations have been found to carry a gene known as HYAL2,
which is involved in skin-cell repair after skin has been exposed to the sun's UVB rays
-- in other words, sunburn.
And this gene also seems to have come from the Neanderthals, likely a helpful adaptation
for modern humans spreading across Asia.
These genes are both examples of a phenomenon known as adaptive introgression, when genetic
material from one species moves into the gene pool of another species, and then is selected
for, so it sticks around.
But these genetic contributions also can have a downside.
Introgressed genes that were once beneficial can become less-so over time, as the environment
in which natural selection is taking place changes.
For example, there's a gene that's involved in the rapid coagulation of blood, which used
to be really beneficial before medical care was available.
But now that gene has been found to increase the risk of blood clots.
And this gene, too, seems to have also come from interbreeding with Neanderthals.
But Neanderthals aren't the only other hominins that we got to know so intimately.
In 2010, paleo-geneticists announced a shocking discovery: a site known as Denisova Cave in
southern Siberia had yielded ancient mitochondrial DNA from a previously unknown hominin.
Earlier work there at had turned up evidence of modern humans and Neanderthals, so the
researchers were expecting that the DNA they extracted from a pinky bone found there would
also be Neanderthal - but it was not.
Almost a decade later, we have seven fossil bones with this unique genetic signature:
There's the tip of a pinky, three molars, a sliver of long bone, and a piece of skullcap
from Denisova Cave, all dated to between about 52,000 to 195,000 years ago.
And there's also a single partial jawbone from the Tibetan Plateau, dated to at least
160,000 years ago.
This new group of hominins has yet to be given a scientific name, because it lacks a type
specimen, a fossil that's complete enough for future finds to be compared to.
So for now, they're informally known as the Denisovans.
And they are essentially a ghost lineage within our own ancestry: a branch of the hominin
family tree that lacks a fossil record.
Now it could be that there are other Denisovan fossils in collections around the world that
just haven't been identified.
But because there's no type specimen, and most fossils don't have DNA that can be
extracted, we just don't know for sure.
But we have sequenced enough of the Denisovan genome to be able to tell some of their story.
For instance, their mitochondrial DNA -- which
is passed down from mothers to their offspring -- suggests that the last common ancestor
that we shared with the Denisovans lived about 1 million years ago.
But the nuclear DNA of Denisovans -- which accounts for most of their genome -- is actually
more similar to ours.
So this might be a sign that Denisovans also interbred with some other hominins within
our lineage, like Homo erectus.
Today, we find small amounts of Denisovan DNA in populations in East and South Asia,
and up to 6% Denisovan DNA in some populations of Melanesians in the southwest Pacific.
And the variations we see between the DNA in modern people and the ancient genomes we
have from Denisovan fossils suggests that there were interbreeding events with at least
three different groups of Denisovans.
So it didn't happen just once, or in just one place.
And some of these genetic contributions are really important.
Take the gene known as EPAS1, found in many people native to the Tibetan plateau.
This gene is associated with differences in hemoglobin concentrations.
And at high altitudes, more hemoglobin means more efficient oxygen transport.
This gene seems to have been introduced by the Denisovans and was strongly selected for
because of the advantages it offered to modern humans living at high elevations.
So, we know that many of the hominins that we used to live and hang around with were
really well-suited to a lot of environments.
So, why aren't there populations of these other hominins walking around today?
Well, anthropologists have been thinking about that for a long time, especially when it comes
to the Neanderthals.
The longest-standing explanations for their
disappearance have been that climate change, competition from modern humans, or some combination
of the two caused their downfall.
And there is some evidence that there were cycles of intense cold and dryness in Europe
between 44,000 and 40,000 years ago, which might've caused Neanderthal populations
to decline, leaving them vulnerable to extinction.
Other researchers have modeled the distribution of Neanderthals and their habitats, and suggest
those habitats were becoming more fragmented by changes in the climate.
As for the impact of modern humans, we know we met Neanderthals, but there's no evidence
of violence or direct competition between the two groups.
So, some researchers have suggested that it was just the continued migration of modern
humans from Africa into Eurasia that pushed the Neanderthals into extinction, and that
we weren't better adapted that they were, we were just more numerous.
Other researchers think it might have been that we had better clothing and technology,
and that social factors, like long-distance trade, may have given us an advantage.
Or, maybe the Neanderthals were just on their way out anyway.
The genetic information that we have suggests that their populations were smaller than those
of modern humans, and that inbreeding might've occurred more often, resulting in decreased
genetic diversity.
This generally makes populations less adaptable to changing environmental pressures.
As for the Denisovans, well, we only just realized they existed at all, but it's possible
that some of the same factors that brought about the end the Neanderthals affected them,
as well.
As a result, we are the only species of hominins left.
But it's kind of remarkable to me how close we were to that not being the case
But this doesn't necessarily mean that Homo sapiens was somehow more fit for survival
from the start.
Because, we really weren't.
The fact is, our species became better adapted to local conditions precisely because we interbred
with other hominins that had evolved to fit those environments.
The other species like the Neanderthals and the Denisovans contributed to our survival
in these new landscapes.
They helped us tolerate new conditions, like high elevations and intense sunlight.
They helped our bodies become better at signalling when we were sick, and they helped our blood
clot faster when we were injured.
The genetic legacy they left us is part of the secret of our success.
And in a sense, those hominins didn't completely disappear, because parts of them live on today,
in us.
They live on in our own genes, reminding us of a time when we weren't alone.
Thanks to this month's Eontologists: Patrick Seifert, Jake Hart, Jon Davison Ng, and Steve.
If you'd like to join them and our other patrons in supporting what we do here, then
go to patreon.com/eons and make your pledge!
And if you want to join us for more adventures in deep time, just go to youtube.com/eons
and subscribe.
Thanks for joining me today in the Konstantin Haase studio, and if you'd like to learn
more about our hominin predecessors, then watch our companion episode, “The Humans
That Lived Before Us.”