Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Trump has said China needs  to pay for the coronavirus.

  • China's going to pay a big price

  • And there's one creative way

  • the US could make China pay.

  • Welcome to China Uncensored. I'm Chris Chappell.

  • A lot of Americanswho don't have crippling  student loan debtare looking for new ways  

  • to invest their savings. The interest  rate on government bonds here in America  

  • is...basically zero. But don't worrybecause investment firms that I trust,  

  • like BlackRock, are encouraging us to  invest in Chinese government bonds.

  • We know China is a great  place to throw our money into,  

  • because they've been issuing government  bonds for more than a century.

  • But according to the American  Bondholders Foundation,  

  • there have been a few small problems in the  past for investors who've bought Chinese debt.  

  • Small problems, like not ever getting paid back.

  • Matt Gnaizda sat down with Jonna Bianco, President  

  • of the American Bondholders  Foundation, to learn more.

  • INTERVIEW

  • All right. Thanks for joining me Jonna.

  • Happy to be here. Thank you.

  • Now you're an expert on Chinese bonds which is  good because they're really hot right now. A  

  • few weeks ago the Chinese government raised  $6 billion in a huge international sale of  

  • their sovereign bonds. So my question is, how much  should I be investing in these new Chinese bonds?

  • Well look, when it comes to China  history has a tendency to repeat itself.  

  • I represent 20,000 U.S. citizens  holding defaulted Chinese sovereign debt  

  • that they defaulted on, refused to pay, although  paid Great Britain. So as we know, history does  

  • repeat itself. Your money gets tied up, they  default, you have nowhere to go to collect it  

  • with China other than your government. And we have  seen nothing but game playing in politics when it  

  • comes to China especially with Beijing Biden and  the Democrats. I mean, we've seen that with the  

  • election, we've seen it with our national  security, we've seen it with the continued  

  • ignoring of the most existential threat we've  ever seen facing this country which is China.

  • I mean, so you're suggesting  that maybe we shouldn't trust the  

  • Chinese communist party? I meanwhat have they ever lied about?

  • I think that the list would be shorter to say what  have they told the truth about. In all honesty,  

  • we cannot trust China. Look, we see President  Donald Trump speaking about it, we see  

  • DNI Ratcliffe, we see secretary Pompeo. Everybody  is saying China is the most existential threat  

  • facing this country and yet it continues to fall  on deaf ears with our politicians on both sides of  

  • the aisle. They know of this threat. I mean  gosh look at this, it took 10 years for the  

  • Senate under McConnell's leadership to get a bill  to the Senate floor and a vote just to make China  

  • and their state-owned enterprises comply with the  very same rules and regulations that every other  

  • company trading on Wall Street from around the  world has to comply with. There's no disclosure,  

  • there's no information available to the  investor. China hides behind state secrets.

  • And so, it took 10 years just to get that bill  to the floor and in that vote they agreed, "Let's  

  • give them three years to come into compliance with  SEC rules and regulations to audit their books.  

  • So investors know where their money's actually  going." Well, I can tell you where it's going,  

  • it's going for nefarious reasons as we've seen  with the military buildup in the South China Sea,  

  • their technology information  stealing. The list is a mile long.  

  • And so, investing in China is very, very dangerous  and there is no control. We've seen the same thing  

  • in the house. I've seen nothing but political  rhetoric pandering to Wall Street and the big  

  • Chinese contributions and donors that fill  their pockets and yet nothing is ever done,  

  • at the peril of the citizens of the  United States and those around the world.

  • Well, and this ties back into what you're  working on because you're the president of  

  • the American Bondholders Foundation. And  back in 1912, so more than a hundred years  

  • ago after the fall of the Qing Dynasty, the  Republic of China government issued a huge  

  • tranche of debt to build their new republic. I  think it was about 25 million pounds of debt,  

  • British pounds. So that's like four billion  U.S. dollars in today's money, right?

  • Right. And they did that in '12, '13, '14, all the  way up through 1938 and then they went into big  

  • default and then the U.S. governmentbecause  they were then an ally in the warallowed  

  • them to borrow U.S. taxpayers' dollars to which  they still never paid back. And then we have the  

  • communist regime, the Chinese communist party  that came in and took over. And other than  

  • being held to account by Margaret Thatcher  in 1987 to pay back this debt, these bonds,  

  • to their citizens no one else has told China you  have to pay your debt, you have to pay your bonds.

  • So let's talk about these bonds  specifically. So the debt that  

  • they'd been issuing in the first half of  the 20th century: Who bought these bonds?

  • Well, banks bought these bonds. I meanthese bonds were sold around the world,  

  • the French, the Belgians, all over the placeThey were advertised in the New York Times,  

  • sold through Wall Street firms in New YorkAmerican citizens, a lot of military people  

  • because it was promoted to military people  to help support our then-ally in the war to  

  • purchase these bonds. And then China defaultedthe communist regime came in and they now refuse  

  • to pay. Keep in mind governments issue long-term  debt 30, 40, 50, 60 year long bonds. In fact,  

  • China is issuing 100-year bonds in Europe as we  speak. And look, sovereign debt does not expire.

  • It's important to note that during World War IIwhich was in the 1940s, Great Britain borrowed  

  • back then $21 billion from AmericaIt was only December 31st of 2006  

  • that they made their last and final payment paying  off that debt of sovereign debt owed to America  

  • which was from tax payers dollars. So  again, sovereign debt does not expire,  

  • government debt does not expire. It would  be no different than somebody who bought  

  • a 30 year treasury bond today 20 years from now  under a different administration says, "Oh gosh,  

  • that was 20 years ago, 30 years ago, that's  old. We shouldn't have to pay that now. Move on,  

  • just move along and don't get your  money." And that's basically what we see.

  • And it's a big bully dealing with China  and their political allies on Wall Street  

  • and corporate America who sold out middle-class to  profit themselves and put Americans out of work,  

  • out of manufacturing. The middle to low  income individual was just out of a job  

  • and it all went to China. And we see the results  of that just like we saw during this pandemic of  

  • not being able to get pharmaceutical suppliesPPE equipment, so on and so forth. And so,  

  • the only people that profited from that is your  senior executives in these Wall Street firms.  

  • And unfortunately, with all of the thousands of  state owned enterprises that China has trading on  

  • our markets that unwitting American citizens  through their retirements, 401ks, pensions  

  • are being invested in China and it's not going  to be too much longer as we've seen the massive  

  • amounts of default go on in businesses in China  that they're going to default again. And those  

  • people are going to lose their pensions, their  401ks, their retirement, and have nothing left.

  • That's a really good point but I want to talk  a bit about the continuity of these long-term  

  • bonds that were issued 100 years ago. I mean  look, I don't want to be held responsible  

  • for things I did 20 years ago but I understand  that for governments it's different. However,  

  • comparing that to what happened in China  to getting a new U.S. president maybe  

  • isn't the best analogy because in 1949  the People's Republic of China took over  

  • from the Republic of China and now the Republic  of China government that had issued those bonds  

  • is now basically what we call the government  of Taiwan. So why should the People's Republic  

  • of China have to pay the debt issued by the  previous government that occupied that region?

  • Because they occupy and control the infrastructure  that these funds were used to create. To this  

  • moment they're still collecting the salt  tax that was used to underwrite these bonds,  

  • it's called successor government doctrine. Sobasically the current government is responsible  

  • for the debts and obligations of the former  government. Look, and China mandates a One  

  • China Policy not recognizing Taiwan as we  very well know. And so, I'm quite confident  

  • that the Republic of China in fact they passed  it in their constitution under Article 63  

  • just not too many years ago that when they become  the real China again they're more than happy, and  

  • are recognized as such, they're more than happy  to pay their financial debts and obligations.

  • In the meantime, they're under the control under  a One China Policy of Beijing and the communist  

  • party and under law, international law, U.S.  law, successor government doctrine prevails.  

  • And there's precedent. Look, Margaret Thatcher  recognized this and in 1987 made it clear  

  • to the People's Republic of Chinathe Chinese communist party,  

  • "You're not going to issue more bonds on  our soil taking more money from our citizens  

  • until you start paying the bonds in the defaulted  debt that you already owe." And so in fact,  

  • the Chinese communist party, the PRC, did in  fact pay Great Britain for the very same bonds  

  • that American citizens are holding, the Frenchthe Belgiums and many others around the world.

  • Well, so the Chinese communist party  recognized the validity of the debt  

  • and paid it back but only to the  British investors and not to the  

  • American investors or bond holdersIs that what you're saying?

  • That is correct. And it's because no American  administration, no president has said to China,  

  • "You have to pay your debts to the American  people." I mean, we hear during election time  

  • on both sides of the aisle of course until this  recent one, "We have to hold China accountable.  

  • We're going to be tough on China." President  Trump ran in 2016 on holding China to account  

  • and in fact made it clear that we are where  we are with China not because that he blamed  

  • China but he blamed former administrations for  not being tough on China and making them play  

  • by the same rules that the rest of the world  played by especially when it comes to trade.

  • So until President Donald J. Trump came  around no previous administration would  

  • hold China accountable. They wouldn't make them  play by the same rules. Now, Donald Trump says  

  • he's going to make China pay, he's going to hold  them accountable. And on behalf of the American  

  • Bond Holders Foundation we do believe he's a  promises made promises kept president. I have  

  • met with him. He has assured me faithfully that he  would resolve this issue but the clock is ticking  

  • and Americans are suffering at the hands of the  Chinese communist party and their plague. And  

  • we're paying $72 million a day of our tax dollars  going to China for Chinese held U.S. Treasuries.  

  • Why can that money not go to the American people  that are suffering because of the Chinese plague?  

  • And so, we're now calling upon President Trump  to uphold your word, your promises that you have  

  • made. Let's keep those promises and let's actually  do something and be tough on China and hold them  

  • accountable versus just political rhetoric that  we see from all of these various politicians.

  • Right. So you guys actually have a very  specific proposal to essentially force the  

  • Chinese communist party to pay back that debt  to U.S. bond holders. What is that proposal?

  • Well, it's actually in the law. It's something  that Congress passed long ago. Basically at the  

  • president's request the treasury secretary can  bring in the bonds held by the American citizens  

  • hereover 20,000 families in 46 statesand  they can use those bonds to extinguish the debt  

  • that America owes to China so basically  you're basically swapping paper for paper.

  • Okay. So basically what you're  saying is that the U.S treasury  

  • buys the Chinese bonds from American bond  holders and then the U.S. Debt that the  

  • Chinese government holds. The U.S. treasury  doesn't pay China back in American dollars,  

  • instead we pay China back with its  own debt. Am I getting that right?

  • That is correct. That is correct. Which will save  hundreds of billions of dollars to the American  

  • people. Because I mean look, the American Bond  Holders Foundation and typical debt settlements  

  • to this capacity, this isn't new. There's been  47 previous bond settlements of defaulted debt in  

  • this country to the Foreign Bondholders Protective  Council which was established in 1934 under  

  • President Roosevelt and secretary of state Cordell  Hall. So what we propose is not anything new.  

  • It just needs to have the political willpower and  the backbone to stand against the communist regime  

  • and hold them accountable. This would be  actually debt settlement number 48. And so,  

  • typical settlements are done at pennies on  the dollar, however utilized at full value to  

  • extinguish debt under a debt offset owed to that  foreign entity. So this isn't anything uncommon,  

  • this isn't anything new, it's already in the  law. It just needs to be upheld and enforced.

  • What's the total amounts of  Chinese government debt from this  

  • 20th century tranche of debtwhat's the total amount held by  

  • Americans and what's the total value that you  think could be gotten back by these bond holders?

  • Well right now, of course you have the accrued  interest and these are gold bonds so it's based  

  • on the current market value of gold. We're holding  nearly $2 trillion worth of these bonds based on  

  • how the courts have ruled on time value, loss of  money, et cetera, by the experts. And so, China  

  • is currently holding approximately 1.1 trillion  in U.S. treasuries. And so, which is why we're  

  • paying $72 million a day of taxpayer dollars that  are going to China. So if you took in these bonds  

  • and you paid out a small fraction of that,  a very, very, I'm talking literally pennies  

  • like under a nickel on the dollar kind of thing  to the American bond holders that hold these  

  • you could extinguish hundreds of billions of  dollars of debt to China that they use those  

  • funds to buy up America as we've seen and  also for nefarious reasons around the world.

  • So, it would be a huge benefit savings to the  American people. It would also help put China  

  • in check. It would hold them accountable. And in  fact, these very same funds could be used as a  

  • stimulus to the American people that have lost  their jobs, are losing their homes, can't feed  

  • their families as a result of the Chinese plague  that we have seen bestowed upon this country.

  • So, the American bond holders under this  proposal themselves would maybe only get  

  • a nickel back on every dollar that they  were originally owed but overall you're  

  • saying that American taxpayers would  save in addition to that because it  

  • would reduce the amount that the U.S.  has to pay back in U.S. treasury debt.

  • That is correct.

  • So, I think one of the interesting things  here that you point out is that the law  

  • that gives the U.S. government the tools  to do this is already in place but it's  

  • not really a question of the law at this point  it's a question of political willpower, right?

  • That is correct.

  • And you have met with Trumpbut so far in four years the  

  • Trump administration has not actually done this.

  • Well, President Trump sent it to Secretary Mnuchin  and that's the problem. He doesn't want to do  

  • anything to rock the boat with the Chinese and so  he keeps pushing the issue off. President Trump  

  • would like to see this done and is committed  to seeing this done and getting it resolved.  

  • And it keeps being sent to Secretary Mnuchin  who pushes it off and does not want to do  

  • anything to rock the boat with China, that's  evident. I mean, he is Mr. China. He's making  

  • decisions that is in China's best interestnot in the interest of the American people.

  • So if Joe Biden becomes the next president  and I recognize that's by no means certain  

  • because obviously this is 2020 and you  never know but if Joe Biden does become  

  • president how do you think he and his treasury  secretary possibly Janet Yellen would handle this?

  • I don't think they would. I mean, we are talking  Beijing Biden here. So, I don't see any support  

  • whatsoever coming from the democratic partyUnfortunately prior to President Trump coming  

  • into office there's been multiple resolutions  out of the House and the Senate on this issue  

  • bi-partisan. It was always a bi-partisan issue  until President Trump was elected president.  

  • And now have you heard one Democrat condemn China  for their handling of the COVID-19? Have you heard  

  • one Democrat condemn China for their spying in  our country through their Confucius Institutes?  

  • Have you had one Democrat condemn China for  anything whatsoever? You will not hear it because  

  • they're working in collusion with the Chinese  communist party to take down President Trump  

  • to turn our country into a socialistic communistic  country and turn it upside down and destroy the  

  • American freedoms that we have. So to get justice  under a Beijing Biden administration? I think not.

  • And I understand your criticism of the  Democrats. I would like to point out that a  

  • number of democratic Senators and Congresspeople  have supported the Hong Kong Human Rights Act  

  • and the Uighur Freedom Act. I forget the actual  name. Nancy Pelosi has been outspoken about the  

  • Tiananmen Square massacre. And some of the stuff  that we've seen is bipartisan support for Hong  

  • Kong and the Uyghurs. Now you're right that you  haven't seen bipartisan support over the COVID-19.

  • I agree with you. They have spoke out in that  regard but what actions did they actually take  

  • to punish China, to go after China, to hold  China accountable? So all of those things  

  • while I think it's great that they spoke out  and condemned it but again political rhetoric.  

  • We need action, action, action and  that is not what we are seeing.

  • Well, I think there's maybe some good news here  because the Hong Kong Freedom and Democracy Act  

  • did give the president essentially the tools to  sanction specific individuals for their abuses in  

  • Hong Kong. And so, you had bipartisan legislation  and then you had the Trump administration actually  

  • activate it so to speak and that  gives me hope that maybe if this...

  • But tell me if sanctioning those people and  sanctioning those handful of people, please  

  • tell me how that affects the rest of Hong Kong and  their citizenry and their freedoms or the Uighurs,  

  • It does not. Tell me how that puts food on the  table to the American people who have lost their  

  • jobs because of the Chinese communist party  and COVID-19. So the same with the travel ban.  

  • While I think the tools that they're using and the  actions that have been taken thus far have been  

  • so minuscule in the grand scheme of things  that it makes it appear that they're doing  

  • something but to what benefit did that help the  Uighurs? To what benefit did that help the freedom  

  • of the Hong Kong people? To what benefit  did blocking travel or sanctioning a handful  

  • of Chinese communist party leadershipwhat benefit was that to the  

  • millions of American people that have lost their  jobs or the hundreds of thousands that have died  

  • as a result of COVID-19 and the  Chinese communist party plague?

  • Well, you're absolutely right. And the benefit to  those policies is really that it disincentivizes  

  • Chinese officials from committing further abuses.  I mean, whether it's effective or not I think it's  

  • hard to say so far. But what it does show is that  there is some ability of Congress to come together  

  • from both sides of the aisle and take some action  on China. And the action that you're proposing  

  • needs to happen through the American Bondholders  Foundation is something that would really require,  

  • there's already the law but it still requires  probably more bipartisan political willpower.

  • Actually it only takes a national security  presidential memorandum, not even an executive  

  • order. It's a national security presidential  memorandum from President Trump to his secretary  

  • of treasury instructing him to follow the process  legalities that we just mentioned and complete  

  • this transaction in holding China accountableSo it doesn't require congressional involvement  

  • or approval, the laws are already in place. It  actually takes the backbone of President Donald  

  • J. Trump in actually holding China accountable to  the American people, to the bond holders, to the  

  • citizens of the U.S. and actually holding China  accountable. So an NSPM is basically all it takes.

  • So given that even under the Trump administration  Secretary Mnuchin has not done this and also given  

  • that the next president might be Joe Biden  what advice would you have for the American  

  • people who are watching this show, something  that they can do to possibly push this along?

  • I recommend they contact the White  House and urge President Donald J.  

  • Trump to sign the National Security Presidential  Memorandum and actually hold China accountable  

  • to not only pay the bond holders but to do  the debt offsets and utilize those funds  

  • as an economic stimulus across America to  help those that are struggling as a result  

  • of the Chinese communist party plague  bestowed upon the American people.

  • This is money that China owes that they  haven't paid. So collect that debt,  

  • let it benefit the American people and the bond  holders and actually hold China accountable.

  • Well, I like your advice to have viewers write  to the White House and I think it's a very  

  • clever solution to have the U.S. Treasury  pay China back for U.S. bonds with China's  

  • own debt that they refuse to pay back. So  thank you very much for joining me Jonna.

  • Thank you so much. I appreciate it.

  • And thank you for watching.

  • Tell us what you think in the comments belowand  

  • let us know if you plan to write to  the White House like she suggested.

  • Once again, I'm Chris Chappell. See you next time.

Trump has said China needs  to pay for the coronavirus.

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it