a grueling 10 weeks of preparation, with 10 hours of studying 6 days per week, and minimal

time off on the weekends. There were certain things I did correct, but several things that

made the journey much more painful than it needed to be. Had I resolved some of these

issues, I would have been able to secure the same score, but without such a struggle. Here's

what you can learn from my MCAT journey. Dr. Jubbal, MedSchoolInsiders.com.

There were a handful of things I did right that facilitated rapid knowledge acquisition

and score improvement. While this isn't a comprehensive list, these are the key factors

I urge other MCAT examinees to prioritize in their own study approach.

The Critical Analysis and Reasoning Section, or CARS, is unique from the other sections

and therefore requires a unique study approach to perform best. Unlike the other sections

of the MCAT, it requires no outside knowledge to answer any of the questions. The test makers

want to assess your ability to comprehend, analyze, and reason through material that

you read. For many, including me, it's the least favorite

section of the MCAT. It feels tedious, boring, and more of a formality than a true assessment

of skills necessary to become a competent future physician. While it's not a perfect

assessment, it turns out CARS is indeed relevant, but that's a story told another time.

The key in dominating your CARS section comes down to regular practice – think low duration

but high frequency. For the MCAT science sections, you do the opposite – higher duration in

a single sitting, but lower frequency. With CARS, I did at least 30 minutes every

day, 5 days per week, for close to 2 months straight. This was the key element in slowly

but surely driving up my score. Sure, at the beginning I focused a bit on techniques and

strategies with CARS, but ultimately the biggest driver of my score improvement came down to

getting the reps in – a little bit every day.

I often compare CARS to training your abs in the gym. The abs are a unique muscle group

in that you can train them quite frequently, at relatively lower intensity compared to

other muscle groups, yet see hypertrophy and strength improvements without overtraining.

Similarly, CARS is best approached with shorter, intense study bouts every day, rather than

dedicating a single “CARS day” once per week. If you attempt to sit down and work

on CARS for hours on end, you'll quickly find yourself burned out and experience a

rapidly diminishing quality of your studying. In MCAT circles, practice questions and tests

are primarily saved in the latter half of a student's MCAT prep. The line of reasoning

being that you need to first learn the content through content review resources, and then

do testing later to understand question styles and timing for the test.

This strategy is suboptimal and leaves several points on the table. In my own MCAT prep,

I focused on a higher than normal volume of practice questions and practice tests. Within

the first 2 weeks, I took one full length practice test. In hindsight, I should have

started even sooner. Every 1-2 weeks after that, I was consistent in taking another.

In the final month prior to my exam, I did at minimum 3 full length practice tests every

week. The key isn't just to get through the practice

test, but also review all the questions appropriately. Only if I was very confident in knowing a

question and all its answer choices did I breeze through it. Every incorrect answer

had to be thoroughly reviewed, as did every question I got correct by guessing or getting

lucky. Practice testing is useful not only later

in the study period, but is also a highly effective way of learning content early on.

I focused on CARS practice passages daily, and the occasional full length practice test

every week or so. In hindsight, it would have been even more effective to purchase a question

bank subscription, such as one with UWorld, and get through additional practice questions

several days per week from the beginning. We tend to focus on the strategies during

the MCAT study period, but the importance of the preceding coursework is often overlooked.

When I took my first practice test 2 weeks into studying, I hit a 67th percentile. This

was approximately 2 months out from my test date, giving me plenty of time to build and

improve upon this foundation. Having a strong foundation from college coursework

elevates the starting point when you begin your dedicated MCAT prep. In doing so, you

raise the ceiling for your ultimate score. Had I goofed off in my first two years and

scored a 20th percentile on my first practice test, there would be a much larger gap to

fill in order to get a satisfactory score. In my first two years of college, during which

premeds focus on their medical school prerequisite courses, I made it a point to apply myself

fully in every course. Rather than cramming last minute, I made it a point to study at

least a little bit 5 days per week. Spreading out the studying in this manner not only helped

me achieve straight A's in these classes, but also consolidated the facts to my long

term memory. Had I crammed, much of the information wouldn't have stuck around to MCAT prep

time. Although I'm happy with my score, there

were several possible points of improvement in my study approach. Had I implemented these

changes, I would have been able to achieve the same score with less effort, less time,

and less pain. It wasn't until medical school that I learned

about proper implementation of active learning, which is far more effective and efficient

that passive means. When I was studying for the MCAT, I primarily relied on passive learning

techniques – passively reading content review books, highlighting, and rereading those highlights.

In doing so, it took me longer to learn and consolidate key facts to my long term memory

for test day. I only occasionally incorporated active methods.

Since my two roommates were also studying for the MCAT simultaneously, we made it a

point to use the Feynman technique occasionally, particularly when we were facing a difficult

concept or getting tired studying on our own. My use of practice tests, with in depth review,

was also an active learning method. My mindset in preparing for the MCAT was to

learn too much information rather than too little. I acknowledged that it would require

more time and effort on my part, but I figured it was a price I was willing to pay to achieve

a top score. After all, it's better to be over-prepared than under-prepared.

I remember spending a full evening memorizing every step of the sound conduction pathway

from the pinna, or external ear, all the way to the cochlear nerve. This was not something

I needed to know for the MCAT based on how it tests these concepts. However, it was in

my content review book, and I figured I should know everything within it cold.

This may seem harmless at first, but this approach leads to massive opportunity cost.

That full evening could have been better spent focused on reviewing content that would show

up on the test, practicing CARS, or even relaxing and recharging.

One common misconception amongst premeds, including my former self, is the importance

of low yield information. I thought that knowing these low-yield details would be the difference

between a good and exceptional MCAT score. In reality, this is not at all the case. Much

of the “low-yield” information in review books is beyond the scope of the MCAT and

contributes zero to scoring higher, which is tremendously costly. Additionally, the

main differentiating factor for top percentile scorers is almost always their in-depth mastery

and precise recall of medium-yield concepts rather than their ability to remember some

esoteric piece of information. When I took the MCAT, there weren't YouTubers focused

on teaching evidence-based study principles to future doctors. In fact, it wasn't until

I got to medical school and was forced to drink from the proverbial fire hydrant of

medical knowledge that I was forced to learn a better way to study. Had I implemented those

evidence-based learning principles in college, I would have been able to get stellar results

in class and on the MCAT, but with far less time and effort.

In short, the two primary evidence-based study principles you should focus on are (1) practice

questions and practice tests and (2) spaced repetition with active recall. These are the

two most effective methods in not only memorizing information, but also learning them deeply

such that you can apply that knowledge effectively on test day.

If I could do it all over again, I would focus on four key principles:

Focus on only the necessary content – some people say to focus only on high-yield content,

which isn't exactly best practice. There is some medium and rarely some low yield content

that you will be tested on. Since you won't know what will and will not be tested on the

MCAT, it's critical to find high yield resources that have done the heavy lifting for you,

so that you don't over- or under-prepare. Incorporate active learning methods – the

bulk of your time spent studying should be spent on (1) practice questions and (2) spaced

repetition with active recall. Content review resources are useful to first learn and understand

the information, but after that, save them as a reference for when you don't understand

something that comes up in your practice questions or flashcards. You should not do multiple

front-to-back passes of your content review resources as a study technique. This is a

highly time consuming and inefficient way to strive for content mastery.

Follow a sustainable study schedule – I was lucky in that I didn't burn out despite

having a grueling 10 week study schedule. Had I pushed my test date back at all, I would

have certainly burned out and my score would be compromised. Remember that the quality and

strategy of your studying is arguably more important than the quantity of your studying.

You'll end up with a better score through high intensity, intelligent study approaches

for 5 hours per day rather than medium intensity, passive study approaches for 10 hours per

day. Use the best quality resources - if the goal

is to get the highest score possible, then it doesn't pay to be overprepared. You want

to only study what you need to study, and spend extra time honing your test taking skills.

If I could do it all over again, I'd heavily rely on Memm, an evidence-based and highly

effective MCAT study tool I had the pleasure of co-founding.

We've now had enough Memm users take the MCAT that we have data to report, and we were shocked

by the numbers. The average Memm user scored a 514.3 on test day, which is the 90th percentile,

and had an average score improvement of close to 12 points! Yeah, we know it's effective,

but even we were surprised by those results. The numbers don't lie, and there's a reason

over 95% of our users rate us 5 stars. Memm is an insanely effective MCAT study tool,

and it makes sense. It was designed by two 99.9th percentile MCAT scorers with extensive

MCAT tutoring experience, and we leveraged the latest in evidenced based learning science

in a single, easy-to-use-tool. Sign up for a 7 day free trial at memm.io and use the

coupon code CRUSHINGIT for 10% off your subscription. Link in the description.

If you enjoyed this video, check out my other MCAT videos, and go check out Memm. You won't

regret it, I promise. Much love, and see you there.