Circular Reasoning, also known as Begging the Question, occurs when the conclusion of

循環證成，也稱為循環推理，

an argument is assumed in the premises.

當在前提中假設論證的結論時就會發生。

Essentially, the argument goes in a circle, with the conclusion simply restating a form

本質上，論證是循環進行的，只是用一種形式重申了

of the original assumption.

原始假設的結論。

It's a logical fallacy because it doesn't provide any actual evidence or reasoning,

這是一個邏輯謬誤，因為它沒有提供任何實際的證據或推理證明其成立，

just reasserts the point in a way that appears to be an argument.

只是以一種看似論證的方式重申了一開始的假設。

Everyday Example: Imagine someone arguing about the trustworthiness

舉例（日常例子）：想像一下，有人在爭論一新聞來源的

of a news source said: "You can trust this news channel because it always tells the truth."

可信度時說：“你可以信任這個新聞頻道，因為它總是說實話。”

This is circular reasoning because the premise (the channel tells the truth) is the same

這是循環論證，因為前提（頻道說的是實話）

as the conclusion (it is trustworthy).

與結論（他是可信的）相同。

It assumes what it's trying to prove without providing any external evidence of the channel's

它假設了它試圖證明的內容，但沒有提供任何其新聞頻道

credibility.

可信度的外部證據。