Subtitles section Play video
In a debate on religious freedom, an atheist might argue, "If we allow any religious symbols
在關於宗教自由的辯論中,無神論者可能會說:“如果我們允許
in public schools, it will soon lead to schools forcing religious teachings
公立學校出現任何宗教標誌,很快就會導致學校強迫
on all students, ultimately ending in government-enforced religious practice."
所有學生接受宗教教義,最終導致政府強制進行宗教活動。”
This argument is a slippery slope because it presumes that a minor acceptance of religious
這種論點是一個滑坡,因為它假設對宗教表達的輕微接受
expression will inevitably escalate to extreme outcomes like mandatory religious indoctrination,
將不可避免地升級為強制性宗教灌輸等極端結果,
without substantiating how or why these extreme steps would necessarily follow.
而沒有證實這些極端步驟必然如何或為何發生。