we can confidently believe that God exists." This  

我們就可以自信地相信上帝存在。”這種

statement is a classic example of  the appeal to ignorance fallacy.

說法就是訴諸無知謬誤的典型例子。

It incorrectly assumes that the  absence of scientific evidence  

它錯誤地認為，缺乏

against God's existence is equivalent  to positive proof of His existence.

反對上帝存在的科學證據就等於證明上帝存在。

This line of reasoning overlooks the  fundamental nature of scientific inquiry,  

這種推理方式忽略了科學探究的基本性質，科學探究

which is primarily designed to test  and understand the natural world,  

的主要目的是測試和理解自然世界，

not to delve into metaphysical  or theological realms.

而不是深入研究形上學或神學領域。

It also ignores the principle that science,  by its nature, often refrains from making  

它也忽略了這樣一個原則，即科學就其本質而言，常常避免

definitive statements about phenomena that lie  outside empirical observation and measurement.

對經驗觀察和測量之外的現像做出明確的陳述。

It conflates the limitations of scientific  methodology with affirmative evidence,  

它將科學方法論的限制與肯定性證據混為一談，

neglecting the nuanced relationship between  faith, belief, and empirical knowledge.

忽略了信念、信念和經驗知識之間的微妙關係。