Subtitles section Play video
I gave him life.
What makes the horror genre so enticing to us?
Is it the feeling of dread that looms in the air?
The search for what tingles your spine.
Or perhaps it's the charm and wit of boundary pushing
films filled with schlock and awe.
Whatever it is that entices you to watch a movie that makes you afraid
of things that go bump in the night.
I invite you to take a seat and learn about the rich history
of your favorite horror films, where they came from
and the influence it has on cinema history.
I'll be taking you on a spiraling journey,
retracing the most impactful horror movies and trends over the decades.
The birth of different subgenres and the fight against censorship.
In an attempt to catalog the complete history
of horror films.
Horror movies are like spicy foods.
At first, things like peppers and hot sauce make your mouth burn.
But as you condition yourself, eating jalapenos here.
Adding spicy seasonings there.
Your tongue's palate gets used to the pain
and you're soon able to enjoy more complex flavors.
Aliens. Zombies.
Found footage.
Vampires, werewolves, Exploitation.
Giallo, body horror.
Most of subgenres in horror seemingly goes on forever, ranging
from the cutest creatures to the spine tingling supernatural.
The history of horror is vast, and fortunately,
we live in a time where watching these impactful movies
and understanding these subgenres, where they came from, why they exist,
and what happened to them is information more widely available than it's ever been.
With such a large catalog of influential and impactful horror films
and media, it can be difficult giving each one their due praise.
Throughout this video, we'll talk about the growth of the genre
from the beginnings of film
to the modern age, while showing examples of important films of their decade.
However, that doesn't mean that they're the only influential films of their time.
If this particular program leaves you excited and wanting for more,
please do leave us a positive review and a healthy thumbs up
as we move into the beginnings of film.
During the silent film-
our first stop on the Train of Terror begins in the early days
of the film industry from the 1900s until the beginning of the 1930s.
During this time, the film industry was smitten with the likes of Charlie
Chaplin and Buster Keaton, which is what occupied American theaters in the 1920s.
Horror films in the United States were very far and few in between,
although it's documented that in 1896, the first horror
film ever created was called The House of the Devil by Georges Méliès,
It only lasted a couple of minutes,
and so I wouldn't really recognize it as the first proper horror feature film.
It looks silly by today's standards, but this was the first time
people were seeing what's called a jump cut.
One of the first in-camera effects ever shown in cinema
history, bringing the imagery of demons and ghosts to life.
Melees was later recognized as the grandfather of special effects
as he moved into creating films like The Astronomer's Dream and A Trip to the Moon.
Although a lot of movies during the silent film era had at times very unsettling
images, the intention of a lot of these movies were more humorous and playful.
Still, one can't ignore how some movies undoubtedly
attempted to strike thoughts of horror and dread in their audience.
One in which is 1911's Italian film
L'inferno, based on Inferno of Dante's Divine Comedy.
The movie follows Dante being led by Virgil
through the circles of Hell and bringing to life
these fantastically morbid visuals pulled from the epic poem
watching Dante and Virgil witness the carnal sinners float above them,
or watching the two walk through the circle of Glutton with these
naked bodies laying on the ground, pelted by rain.
Feels so horrifying to watch.
Watching the film in the dark with the lights turned off can feel very unsettling.
Between the 1900s through the 1930s, the silent film era for horror
consisted of literary works of past gothic tales
like The Phantom of the Opera and The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
The most influential genre films of the era
came from the expressionist movement
in Germany, with movies like The Cabinet of Dr.
Caligari and Nosferatu, two films that have iconically
given inspiration to some of the most celebrated directors of our time.
Most notably the works of Tim Burton.
This town needs an enema.
German Expressionism used tall, sharp and warped buildings,
shadows that were painted on walls to give rooms, these unnatural shapes.
Misshapen windows and doors, exaggerated towns and buildings.
Almost every Tim Burton film uses this art style
to show these dreamscapes of the macabre by using these harsh shadows
and exaggerated silhouettes as ways to signify feelings of dread and tension.
And although Tim Burton is the most well-known for his use of expressionism,
the influence of these landmarks can be seen in multiple movies throughout film history.
Citizen Kane's use of harsh lighting and tilted
cameras is very reminiscent of the Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.
Noir Films also pulled a lot of inspiration from the lighting used
in German expressionism.
Even films like Disney's Fantasia have scenes referencing the art
style of these gothically set stories.
The Cabinet of Dr.
Caligari and Nosferatu is what some consider the beginning
of the horror genre since the term horror film
wasn't created until 1931 after the release of Dracula.
And although horror films were few and far in between, the film industry
in the United States was rapidly growing towards the end of the 1920s.
And as more theaters opened up to show more movies to cash in on the new media.
Universal Pictures in Hollywood, California, would break into the industry
in 1931 with the greatest addition to film.
-have come
-you can't piss on hospitality.
I won't allow it!
How do you do?
Mr. Carl Laemmle feels it would be a little unkind to present this picture
without just a word of friendly warning.
We are about to unfold the story
of Frankenstein, a man of science who sought to create a man
after his own image without reckoning
upon God.
Welcome to the golden age of horror films, where we've got the monster mash
or Dracula, Frankenstein's Monster, The Wolf Man, the Mummy, Creature
from the Black Lagoon, The Invisible Man.
I got it. I got it.
I know your damn words. All right.
Hollywood's horror films were centered around
these iconic monsters of the thirties leading up to the fifties.
Listen to them.
Children on the night.
What music they make.
which were honestly just melodramas taking place on these striking
gothic set pieces where you can see the clear influence of the Cabinet of Dr.
Caligari with these long castle stairwells and deformed shadows to show both wonder
and dread.
1931 marked the first introduction
to the Universal Monster Classic with Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi.
And since the term horror film wasn't created yet,
the vampire movie was instead marketed as a love story, calling it
the story of the strangest passion the world has ever known.
Something I've always found interesting with Dracula was how it was filmed
two different times and had three versions available for theaters.
The English version, the Spanish version, and the silent film version.
Instead of dubbing the actors voices, Universal Pictures would instead hire
foreign actors to re film the movie to release for the foreign market
during the day.
Tod Browning would direct the English version of Dracula, and by night George
Melford would use the sets to create the Spanish version of Dracula.
So there's actually two different versions of the movie.
Listen!
The children of the night.
What music they make.
However, the idea ended up being a flop,
and so Dracula was the last film that Universal Pictures did this idea with.
Even during the transition of Sound, some theaters even had a silent
film version with Intertitles cut into the scenes.
If you want even more versions of the movie, there's the original score,
which is just the title sequence with Swan Lake played in the background.
Or you could have the Philip Glass score
that was created in 1999.
The point is,
this movie has more versions than your modern day Zack Snyder film.
Dracula was a resounding success, and Universal Studios wanted to capitalize
on their recent venture immediately going into production
with their next motion picture, Frankenstein.
Production of the film was incredibly quick.
It began in August 1931,
concluded in October of the same year and released in November.
Bela Lugosi, who had just found success with Dracula, was hoping to land
the role of Henry Frankenstein, but was offered the role of the monster,
which at the time of the pitch, had no emotional pathos added to it.
Lugosi famously turned down the role, and instead it was given to Boris Karloff
in the classic story of a misunderstood man made creation
and its mad scientist.
Frankenstein was a cinematic masterpiece with
some of the most iconic images in film history.
It's been referenced countless times
throughout the history of cinema and its artistic style of grasping German
expressionism influenced some of our favorite movies to this day.
Something I find
interesting is that both Dracula and Frankenstein ended up being censored
by the motion picture production code, commonly referred to as the Hays Code
that took place between 1934 to 1968.
It provided films with do's and don'ts on what Hollywood
films should be depicting, and studios followed the guideline
all the way until, I think like around the mid 1950s.
These guidelines forced cuts in movies deemed to be too much for viewers,
such as the ridicule of the clergy, the use of drugs, the use of firearms,
arms, pointed profanities at God and white slavery.
As tame as these films are to a modern day viewing.
At the time,
these movies were very revolutionary and frightening to audiences worldwide.
There's a famous line in Frankenstein where Henry says,
In the name of God?
I know what it feels like to be God.
In the thirties, that was a pretty blasphemous thing to say,
and so they replaced the second half of that line with thunder.
the restored line
actually only became available in 1999 on VHS and DVD,
and before that it was only available on laserdisc to get the restored version.
The reason why I find this interesting is because in the movie Scream,
which came out in 1996, it played the censored version on VHS
because that was the only version that was available in that format until 1999.
It's alive!
Henry in the name of God.
In the name of God?
Now I know what it-
So if you or your kids watch Frankenstein with its modern cut nowadays
and end up loving it and then went to go watch Scream, you'd be confused
as to why there's a thunderclap covering up an iconic line.
Another interesting tidbit is that the Castle thunderclap recorded
specifically for the censorship of Frankenstein, is also
incredibly famous and has been recycled, updated,
revised and used through films and TV ever since it was released.
You can find it in Pee-Wee's Big Adventure.
I don't need anybody!
The Haunted Mansion.
Back to the Future
and Ghostbusters.
Making it kind of the Wilhelm Scream of horror movies.
The Wolf Man stars Lon Chaney Jr,
who would reprise his role in four sequels as The Wolfman.
He's also the son of Lon Chaney, who was an actor and makeup artist
for movies like The Phantom of the Opera and The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
Although not the first werewolf film ever created, it's really
what catapulted the werewolf subgenre into the mainstream.
Even though Universal Pictures released Werewolf in London in 1935,
six years prior to the Wolfman.
However, that movie wasn't as much of a commercial success.
And no, not an American Werewolf in London, just Werewolf of London.
But it was a large influence on an American Werewolf in London
and its sequel, An American Werewolf in Paris.
Released in 1941,
the movie is beautifully shot with these mist covered forest
and is a staple of the modern werewolf subgenre.
It's also an original screenplay written by the Jewish screenwriter Curt Siodmak,
who used The Wolfman as a way to represent his feelings
of being forced to leave Germany when Hitler's Third Reich came to power.
Movies like The Invisible Man, The Mummy and Creature
from the Black Lagoon would join the universal Monster lineup, becoming
iconic symbols of the golden age of horror, influencing
modern directors with their groundbreaking special effects at the time.
And that's what happened to me. And I really have
this vision of
Julie Adams swimming over the Gilman in Creature from a Black Lagoon.
And I thought, That's the most beautiful image I've ever seen.
And I really I don't think I really thought they're going to end well.
They're gonna up together.
It was the first time I saw it.
And when when it ended really, really bad, I thought I got to correct this.
During this time, other very important horror
films were created outside of Universal's Scope.
One of which was directed by Tod Browning, the director behind Dracula,
in his next film, Freaks.
We accept her, one of us.
Gooble gobble. Gooble gobble.
We accept her, we accept her.
Gooble gobble. Gooble gobble.
A trapeze artist named
Cleopatra is part of a traveling carnival sideshow where she seduces
a little person named Hans, even though he's engaged to Frieda.
After finding out that Hans had inherited a fortune.
She plots to kill him, along with Hercules, another member of the carnival.
When the freaks announce
that they have come to accept Cleopatra as a member of their
untraditional family of freaks.
She begins to mock and berate them along with Hans.
The sideshow family doesn't take this lightly and begins to plot their demise.
I love this movie and think it's way better than Dracula
and one of Tod Browning's best films, which is a shame
because this is pretty much, you know, the last movie that he made.
Freaks is very misinterpreted
and as much of a horror film as something like Parasite or Aliens is.
It's filled with these vignettes of the troops
everyday life, like just going out and enjoying themselves under the sun
or the super sweet way that Phroso interacts with Schlitz.
Oh, hello, Elvira.
Hello Jenny Lee.
Look.
hasn't Schlitz got a beautiful dress?
Isn't that pretty?
When I get the powers,
I'm gonna buy her a big hat with a long feather on it.
To even except Cleopatra, a seemingly normal, able bodied woman into their family
after she marries Hans.
It just absolutely melts my heart.
When the movie was released, it caused such a huge controversy
that its original runtime of 90 minutes was cut down to a little over
an hour with the rest of its content lost in cinema history
because of the unfavorable response they gained during test screenings.
It was also banned in the UK by the British censors
for over 30 years before finally being granted an X rating in 1963.
Saying exploited for commercial reasons, the deformed people that it claimed
to dignify.
Ironically, Tod Browning was actually a circus performer himself
at the age of 16 as a contortionist and clown and insisted
on casting the kind of persons with disabilities that he knew
from his work experience and fascination with carnivals.
Alone, that is remarkable, considering
if this movie was remade today, it'd probably hire non-disabled actors
and instead use makeup and special effects to play their parts instead.
Since it's retrospective review, the film has become a cult classic
and has even been submitted into the National Film Registry for Preservation.
And although Freaks was sadly swept under the rug, the Thirties had another movie
that was just too big to fit underneath one.
Remade in 2005, the original King
Kong from 1933 still stands the test of time for a modern day viewing.
The movie was incredibly advanced for its time on a technical level,
using back projection, stop motion animation pre-dating Harryhausen
Matte paintings, miniatures and models to create a beautiful piece of cinema
with these lavish landscapes and intense scenes of amazing stop motion animation.
And this was all done before green screens, digital effects and digital
editing software.
And so seeing this movie be able to accomplish these fantastical scenes
with what they had to work with is truly an eighth wonder of the world.
The story is a classic and its pacing is incredibly
good for a movie with two three act structures.
When the crew arrives on the island and rescues their actress,
and when they bring Kong back to the States.
In a modern day viewing
the movie's stereotypical depiction of people of color can be a bit jarring.
Seeing people of color portrayed as just primitive tribes and the awkward
parallel of slavery by bringing a gorilla with these big lips and flat nose
chained up on a boat
and brought to the United States can be a little bit hard to swallow.
It's literally a parallel of the white man
afraid of black men taking their white women away from them.
For me, seeing an Asian person depicted as this cook with the fresh off the boat
accent and attire just doesn't really sit well with me every time I see it.
It's also pretty misogynistic at times towards women.
Like when the actress gets on the boat and is told that women
shouldn't be on a boat, that a woman only brings trouble for men.
It's it's kind of bad.
I think this is awfully exciting.
I've never been on a ship before.
I've never been on one with a woman before.
I guess you don't think much
of women on ships do you?
No, they're a nuisance.
I'll try not to be.
You've been on the way already.
That being said, on a technical level, the movie is still fantastic
and its story is as classic as classic gets.
The movie has been referenced, parodied and analyzed
throughout history as a highly influential film over its existence.
But really, what's a giant monster film with only one monster?
Why not two?
Why not five?
Why not more than just gorillas?
What about insects, blobs
and radioactive-
Watch the skies.
Greetings, my friend.
We're all interested in the future, for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Coming off of World War 2 and into
the age of rock and roll and drive in movie theaters.
Science fiction became incredibly popular.
War of the Worlds.
The Day the Earth Stood Still
and Forbidden Planet were just some of the movies
released during this time when after the horrific events
of the atomic bomb, people wondered if technology had gone too far.
It is a ghost city.
The buildings are in ruins.
Its economy and its people are in ruins.
Capitalizing on the fear of the backlash from nuclear warfare,
Japan created the Kaiju subgenre with Gojira in 1954,
the first film of the iconic monster Godzilla.
Although with recent Kaiju films such as Pacific Rim and Godzilla
versus Kong, the subgenre has shifted more towards action
and adventure.
However, the roots of the subgenre
were born from the black and white Japanese film.
The success of Gojira launched Toho into a Kaiju
frenzy by spitting out countless campy Godzilla films
that became increasingly more ridiculous as the franchise continued.
Mothra,
Rodan, Gigan and Ghidorah would become some of the most well-known
Kaiju monsters to ever bless the Godzilla franchise.
These films are very hit and miss with audiences because they can be
so ridiculous.
For me, I still can't get the theme of Jet Jaguar out of my head,
and it's been like over 15 years since I first saw
Godzilla versus Megalodon.
Science fiction became the preferred source of media in the U.S.
The entire decade was filled with movies about the radioactive,
the strange and the otherworldly.
Almost every horror film at the time had a plot of science fiction
from movies like The Blob, a film about a literal mutagenic blob attacking people
and Them! A movie about gigantic ants.
A lot of films in the fifties were very pro-military,
and a majority of horror science fiction relied on the characters
going to the government to seek protection from the monsters
portrayed in the movies.
This kind of propaganda ran rampant throughout the fifties,
glorifying the military and the American U.S. Soldier.
Movies like them, An Invasion of the Body Snatchers heavily
relied on the government and military officials to fix the problems
that the characters were faced with.
Whether it's giant monsters,
aliens from another planet
or creatures created from the fallout of the atomic bomb.
although it seems hokey and cheesy by today's standards
Them! was one of the first giant insect creature features
that helped shape the landscape of science fiction films during its time.
It still holds up to a modern day watch with the amazing
special effects used to create the giant ants portrayed throughout the movie.
Invasion of the Body
Snatchers would also become a science fiction staple, joining the National Film
Registry to be preserved as a cultural or historically significant film.
Even if you've never watched the movie or read the book,
it was based off of
Invasion of the Body Snatchers has been referenced
and rehashed in different forms throughout the history of film
that a modern audience would still probably know what the movie is about.
It was largely ignored during its first theatrical run
and has since been reassessed as a true classic of the science fiction genre
leading to it being remade in 1978, which is more than likely
the version you're probably most familiar with.
The movie attacks McCarthyism
in an era of anti-communism
as well as the fear of losing individual identity
which would turn into a common theme throughout science fiction films.
Although the 1982 version of The Thing by John Carpenter is commonly referred to
as the remake of the 1951 film The Thing from Another World,
the movies share very little similarities to the point of the two movies
being completely different in terms of plot
with the only shared qualities being the title and the setting.
Both films were actually loosely based on the novella
Who Goes There by John W Campbell, and both movies
use different parts of the novella to tell their story.
The thing from Another World uses the beginning of the novella,
where a crew of researchers discover an alien spaceship buried in ice
and use thermite to excavate it, but accidentally end up
destroying the spaceship with its very iconic scene of the scientist
tracing the object's shape with their bodies to discover
it's a flying saucer.
The scientists bring back an alien body that they discovered encased in ice near
the wreckage and bring it back to thaw it out
releasing the monster inside.
This is where the thing from another world diverges from the novella.
Instead of having a shapeshifting monster that can take the form of any living creature
the monster in The Thing From Another World is instead an advanced plant
based organism that came from outer space and feeds on blood.
John Carpenter's version of the thing shows the monster in various forms.
1951's The Thing from Another world is a lot more reserved
with its monster showcase.
Showing very small glimpses of the monster
until around 50 minutes into the movie when we unexpectedly
see the full creature, even though it's only for a brief moment.
The last 30 minutes of the film is a visual spectacle.
When we watch the monster attack the crew members and be doused with kerosene
and then lit on fire repeatedly before it inevitably escapes.
This was actually the first full body person on fire stunt in cinema history.
Shot in this beautiful, low key black and white where
the full body stunt becomes the main source of lighting for the scene.
The Thing From Another World received high praise on its release and has since
been cited as one of the greatest science fiction films of the 1950s.
The movie would also become highly influential to future directors
such as Ridley Scott, Tobe Hooper, and most famously John Carpenter.
He first references
the film in Halloween, where Laurie Strode is seen watching The Thing
From Another World on the night that Michael Myers returns to Haddonfield
and then went to create his own version of the film, releasing in 1982,
paying homage to the original with its similar offbeat humor.
What did you say the number of that bulletin was?
629-49, item 6700 extracts, 75,131
Oh...
Oh that one.
Blair, have you seen Fuchs?
I don't want to stay out here anymore.
I want to come back inside.
Having the same title sequence
and even having its own full body fire stunt
as a nod to its 1951 predecessor.
Where science fiction became a huge influence on films
during the 1950's
French films were becoming more unique and stylized,
leading to the French New Wave movement going into the 1960s.
Based on the book, She Was No More
Les Diabolique is a French psychological horror film about a man named Michel.
His wife, Christina, and his mistress, Nicole
Michel is an abusive husband and principal
that runs a second rate boarding school, paid for by his wife, Christina.
Michel also openly has a relationship with his mistress, Nicole, with whom
Christina begins to grow bond with, while also openly knowing about the affair.
Having enough of Michele's abusive tendencies
Christina and Nicole plot the murder of Michelle
and lure him out into town where they drown him in a bathtub.
Returning back to their boarding school, the women dump the body into the school's
neglected pool to frame the murder as a suicide.
But when the pool is drained,
they find out that the body is no longer there.
Directed by Henri-Georges Clouzot.
I got that one.
The movie is alarming to have been made during the fifties
and was received well by both critics and audience members.
The film grew so popular with audiences that it became one of the first
foreign films to be shown with a wider release in the US and multiple theaters,
art houses and drive in movie theaters.
The fifties marked the beginnings of the French New Wave movement
in the sixties, where directors would become more of an auteur profession
instead of just creating commercial cookie cutter films.
Les Diabolique is an example of a director who implemented their unique style
into the movie.
Not only do we see two very strong and independent female characters,
which were very hard to come by during the fifties, but the way that
the story unfolds
and Clouzot's use of film composition
staging
and lighting techniques stylized the film, unlike most horror movies of its time.
At the climax of the film, the husband Michel rises
from the bathtub and literally scares the main protagonist to death.
Revealing that Michelle and Nicole had planned the entire ordeal
together in order to inherit Christina's fortune.
This makes watching the film multiple times more interesting.
As we can see subtle visual clues that Clouzot uses throughout the film
to foreshadow their diabolical plan.
This is what's called the rule of triangle that you can see
in multiple films that stage three or more characters inside of a scene.
As an introductory scene of the character's relationship
early on in the film, on our first viewing as an audience member.
We're sympathetic towards Christina and Nicole.
However, visually, Clouzot cleverly stages the scene using the rule of triangle,
placing both Nicole and Michelle on the same plane while separating
Christina to show her separation of the two characters.
We can see this visual separation happen again during the dinner scene
after Michel verbally abuses Christina to the point of her having to swallow spoiled fish.
To visually represent her entrapment and imprisonment
the sets of the movie and lighting are dense with bars
and railings to represent how oppressed Christina is throughout the film.
Alfred Hitchcock was a huge influence on the French New Wave movement,
and Clouzot pays homage to Hitchcock's Rear Window during the final scene
where she investigates a mysterious light at the school.
The use of strong, low key lighting heightens the tension in the movie,
and its lack of a musical score further exemplifies the terror.
Hitchcock was also reportedly interested in directing
an adaptation of the book She, Who Was No More but its rights
were already given to Clouzot to create Les Diabolique
and so Hitchcock instead gained the rights of The Living
and the Dead from the same creators and turned that into Vertigo instead.
The influence of Les Diabolique on Hitchcock's Psycho is almost hard to deny.
Both of them, even including a murder
located within a bathroom, a location where we, as audience members
see as a place of safety, which is then turned into a murderous scene.
Although it's a completely different style
you could see Hitchcock watching this and
using it as inspiration.
There's the grabbing, just like Janet Leigh grabbing of the shower curtain.
There she is against the wall.
And now there's the slides down the wall.
That, to me is the same shot.
That's the one thing that he said.
Yeah, I've got to steal it. It's too good.
Victimized woman sliding helplessly down the wall.
Of course he does
that same shot in the birds.
We saw it in the man Who Knew too much.
If Hitchcock didn't get to do the murder in the bathtub of Diabolique,
he's his revenge was going to be the shower scene in Psycho.
He said, I'll show that Clouzot
Clouzot's marketing campaign for the film
also included a no spoiler warning for audience members.
This was later replicated by Hitchcock.
To the same vein with the release of Psycho
in 1960, five years after the release of Les Diabolique.
This can be looked at as two directors who highly respected one
another's work during their time.
During the mid 1950s, a production studio called
Hammer Films became synonymous with the horror genre
after the release of their film the Quatermass Experiment in 1955.
where the 1931 Universal Monsters were black and white classics
Hammer took the properties and made iconic colorized versions of the films
with significantly more onscreen violence and bloodshed.
This was due to the advent of Technicolor and in Dracula,
which has now been renamed as the horror of Dracula is one of the first
British horror films made using the three strip Technicolor process.
Although color was already prominent throughout films during this time,
with movies like Singin in the Rain, The Wizard of Oz and Gone With the Wind
the technology of Technicolor was still very difficult to use on set
and horror films had a much lower budget than other bigger Hollywood films
that could comfortably use three strip cameras on their movie sets.
It wouldn't be until the late 1950s that color became more standardized
in movies with the advent of competition to Technicolor.
Hammer films were what made actors like Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing
become so iconic in the horror community and is what revitalized the production
company into becoming such a powerhouse inside of the horror genre.
To avoid censorship from the BBFC, the Hammer Films company
would regularly submit their films for review in their black and white prints
in order to stifle
the BBFC's recognition with their at the time, extreme uses of blood.
Some of the most recognizable films from Hammer were theatrical Gothic tales.
So if you enjoyed that type of cinema, there definitely worth the watch.
But besides a select few films that were great adaptations,
such as The Curse of Frankenstein, The Curse of the Mummy's Tomb,
or the demanding performance of Christopher Lee as Dracula, the quality
and variety of Hammer films can vary wildly, especially during its later years.
Movies like The Devil Rides Out are still coveted
as being some of the best that Hammer has to offer going into the sixties
where the horror genre became increasingly more loved.
I'm wishing [distorted]
What does Katana mean?
It means the Japanese sword
The 1960s was a very strange time for horror films.
A majority of audiences were still burned out from the Universal
Monster Classics and the low budget sci fi horror adjacent movies of the fifties.
Horror movies were put on the backburner of studio minds as just cheap thrills.
However, directors still found ways to take the idea of horror movies
and elevate them into a new light, such as the works of Alfred Hitchcock.
Roman Polanski.
And even in Japan, as directors began melding its cultures
folklore mythologies into feature length films.
To me, I look at the 1960s as the decade where a horror movies began to create
powerful female leads and characters instead of being made through the eyes
of a male protagonist.
Reflecting Western culture as this revival of feminism began to grow.
Instead of placing stereotypical females into these horror movies,
their characters became more fleshed out and involved in the actual plot
of the films and not just being, you know, damsels in distress.
This movement becomes a standard portrayal as we move into the modern era of horror
films with concepts such as the final Girl trope,
monstrous menstruation and just general female empowerment.
I would even go as far to say that the horror genre is one of
if not the most female empowering genre in movies.
I got to go.
I am a God.
Okay?
Eyes Without a Face is a perfect example of a female centered
horror film about a woman struggling to break out of her father's patriarchy.
It's a black and white
French movie revolving around a woman whose face becomes scarred
and misshapen due to a car accident, leaving only her eyes intact.
Her father and his assistant continuously insist
that she wear a featureless mask to hide her disfigurement as they kidnap
young women and graft their faces on to the daughter.
Although poorly received on its initial release, it gained
higher critical praise during its theatrical rerelease in 1986
over 25 years since its original run, with its influence reaching to as recent
as the 2011 film The Skin I Live In as its spiritual successor.
In the documentary A Cut Above the Rest, a retrospective
look at the making of the 1978 classic Halloween.
John Carpenter even stated
It was originally written the way you see it.
In other words, it's a pale mask with human features almost featureless.
I don't know why I wrote that down, why Debra and I decided on that.
Maybe it was because of an old movie called Eyes Without a Face.
It's a French film, Franju made it
this girl had a burned face, so she wore this
face mask. It was real creepy because it was
featureless and immobile, except for her eyes.
Eyes Without a Face came out during this French New Wave movement
where arthouse films became more prominent.
And so when Eyes Without a Face was released in France,
it was probably shocking.
I mean, in the 1960s, watching this scene where they're pulling
the face off of their first victim is pretty gnarly for its time.
If the shower scene in Psycho was already graphic enough for audience members, Eyes
Without A Face would have been similar to torture porn on its release.
For a modern day watch, the movie still holds up pretty well
and you can see the influence of German Expressionism throughout the movie.
It's so eerie watching this woman walking around with this featureless mask
longing for the outside world to the point of calling her fiance
that thinks that she's dead
and just listening to his voice over the phone.
A scene that is later replicated in Halloween when Michael
picks up the phone with Laurie on the other end of the line.
This motel also has as an adjunct
an old house
which is, if I may say so
a little more sinister looking
less innocent than the motel itself.
And in this house, the most dire, horrible events took place.
1960 also saw the release of Alfred Hitchcock's most famous film, Psycho,
A motion picture that forever changed the landscape of horror movies.
At the time of its initial release
there was no other movie that was as controversial
shocking and violent, leading to mixed reviews, only
to be reassessed years later, much like Eyes Without a Face.
From an opening scene with an unmarried woman laying in bed
with a man to the cross-dressing likes of Norman Bates, the film relentlessly
attacks the audience with imagery far ahead of its culture's time.
The movie opens up with its famous red herring, Marion
Crane, laying in bed with her boyfriend, Sam Loomis.
She comes across a cash payment of $40,000 from her work to deposit
and decides to steal it and run away with Sam to start a life together.
She stops for the night at the Bates Motel, where she meets Norman Bates
along with her infamous demise in the shower.
The shower scene in Psycho
is famously displayed in 52 cuts rapidly spliced together.
And in a scene
that only lasted about 2 minutes, it disturbed audiences across the world.
The murder of a woman in a shower of a nude woman.
Now as you know, you could not take the camera
and just showing you a nude woman being stabbed to death.
It had to be done impressionistically.
So it was done with little piece of film.
The head, the feet, the hands
the shower itself.
I think in that scene there was 78
pieces of film in about 45 seconds.
Not only did the movie Kill Off what was believed
as the main character halfway through the film
it was incredibly violent and shocking for its time.
This scene is so significant you can draw a visible line
in the history of horror movies as films before and films after the shower scene of Psycho.
Violence became a common aspect in films, and no longer
were horrors derived from monsters and creatures like Dracula and Godzilla.
Instead, the horrors were focused on the dark
depths of the seemingly normal people around you.
Seeing Psycho is an important piece of horror film history would be
an understatement as it's synonymous with the genre at this point.
Not only is the movie regarded as the first slasher film, along with
Peeping Tom, it was also highly influential for Italian horror films,
with how stylish and graphically intense it is even for a black and white movie
Psycho has been referenced countless times.
It's one of the most recognizable movies
in film history and its score is one of the most iconic to date.
Again, we also have these believable, relatable and independent
female characters that make up the cast of the movie
and not just love interest for the male characters.
And then we have Rosemary's Baby, a psychological horror movie about female
domestication, the troubles of motherhood and the horrors of involuntary birth.
Directed by Roman Polanski, the film centers
around the couple Rosemary and Guy as they move into a new apartment.
When the couple starts making friends with the people in the building
Rosemary begins to uncover the secret occult that the residents
of the apartment have joined and in order to advance his acting career.
Guy promises the life of his firstborn child.
And that night, Satan visits Rosemary, raping
and impregnating her with its child without her knowledge.
The people in the building start to become heavily invested in the child,
leading to Rosemary to believe that there's some kind of hidden agenda.
Something I always find funny about this movie.
Not that the topic is funny is how terrible Guy
is at gaslighting the night after Satan rapes Rosemary.
He just plays it off that he's the one that had sex with her and she says,
I didn't want to miss baby night. you and a couple of my nails ragged.
You-
and a couple of my nails were ragged
-and it was kind of fun in a necrophilia sort of way.
It's like, wow.
And here I thought that a complete stranger had raped me
but it was it was just my own husband that raped me.
It makes me feel a whole lot better.
When it comes to psychological films
Rosemary's Baby sits at the top as one of the best.
It's got an amazing soundtrack and although was not the first
psychological horror film, it's widely considered as the most quintessential
along with Polanski's earlier film, Repulsion.
Other films would follow in its steps for psychological movies
like The Shining and has become a recent subgenre trend
in horror films like The Babadook and Midsommar.
Hereditary actually follows the same themes as Rosemary's Baby
like Involuntary Motherhood and using the occult to highlight societal fears.
I mean, both movies occult followers actively falsify information
towards the main protagonist in order to force them to do what they want.
Rosemary's Baby highlights the distress of people
moving from rural homes to the city during the sixties and Hereditary
highlights the emotional distancing of the modern family.
The occult uses both divisions to then push their agenda.
That's not to say that the movies are the same
they're drastically different.
But the foundation of the psychological subgenre from Rosemary's
Baby can be seen in today's recent trend of horror films.
During the sixties, writer and director Kaneto Shindo would create
two amazing horror films in Japan entitled Onibaba and Kuroneko.
Although different movies, Shindo's styles and themes of women and sexuality
grief and poverty can be seen in both films
which were shot in beautiful black and white negative.
Personally, I love these movies because they're these samurai
supernatural ghost films with incredibly surreal imagery.
Onibaba is a tragic tale of a mother and daughter in law living in grief alone
in a field of reeds, waiting for Kichi, the son of the mother and the husband
of the daughter in law to return from war.
In order to survive the two women ambush
Samurai soldiers and strip them of their armor and weapons, dumping their bodies
into a deep pit and selling their goods to a merchant for food.
One day, their neighbor, Hachi, who was drafted into the war along
with Kiichi, returns home and informs them that Kiichi had been killed.
Kichi's wife begins to sleep with Hachi in order to deal with the grief
of losing her husband
Even though Kichi's mother disapproves of the intimate relationship
going as far as attempting to try and scare her into leaving Hachi
using a Hanya mask she got from killing a samurai.
It's a very slow burn
and the images on screen aren't going to be nightmare inducing visuals
but the story and especially the atmosphere is unbridled in current films.
There's just something about Japanese cinema from the fifties and sixties
that really resonates with me and Asian cinema is becoming more popular
as Western media begins to adopt movies
like Parasite and Train to Busan or shows like Squid Game.
You have this beautifully shot movie that uses black and white film
to tell this tragic story with these stark shadows and chilling soundscapes.
This social criticism of the civil Wars effect on farmers during this transitional
period of an agricultural society moving into an industrial one.
Strong female characters that aren't ashamed of things like sex and violence
even though they're unnamed characters in the movie.
Shindo's follow up with Kuroneko is what I would consider the best horror
film of the 1960s and one of my favorites of all time.
A woman named Yone and her daughter in law Shige
live in a house in a bamboo grove and are raped and murdered
by a returning troop of samurai burning down their home afterwards.
The women return as ghosts, luring samurai into this illusion
based home in the grove to seduce and drink their blood.
Meanwhile, Gintoki returns from the war and finds his mother and wife's
home burned to the ground.
He's made into a samurai in his return and is given the job to destroy the evil
ghost, killing the samurai
eventually coming to the conclusion that they are his own mother and wife.
Again, the atmosphere and eeriness of the movie is further
amplified by its beautiful black and white cinematography.
It's such a tragic love story
and watching the characters travel through this eerie bamboo grove
gives off such a feeling of dread mixed with these disturbing soundscapes.
Both movies deal with these concepts of grief and lust
that you just don't see in Western films during its time.
To be frank, there's really nothing else like Onibaba
and Kuroneko and anyone who's interested in Japanese cinema
should watch both of them at least once because they are amazing precursors
to modern Japanese horror films like Ringu and Ju-on.
However, one movie steps up to the base with its own social commentary
on the state of Western culture.
They're coming to get you, Barbara.
Stop it.
You're ignorant.
They're coming for you, Barbara.
Stop it. You're acting like a child.
They're coming for you.
Look, there comes one of them now.
Although the re-animated dead in the film are never referred to as zombies,
the 1968 independent classic Night of the Living Dead
marks the beginning of the modern day zombie subgenre.
Previously, zombies were referred to as mindless slaves
usually created by voodoo rituals like I Walked With A Zombie.
But this idea of flesh eating cannibalism from reanimated corpses
was new territory, and the film shocked audiences with its visceral
images and black lead actor
Night of the Living Dead is
a significant horror movie on multiple levels.
It created a subgenre of horror films with Romero's
iteration of zombies that became adopted throughout its following years of release.
At its time, the movie was incredibly shocking
for its audience, with its depiction of cannibalism and disturbing images.
Not only do we have a child murdering her own mother
the audience's expectation of a white female lead is subverted
almost immediately when Ben is introduced into the film,
making it the first horror movie with a black lead actor.
When Night of the Living Dead released, African-Americans
and people of color were stereotyped as tribal members, slaves
and servants or general backdrops for white actors to take center stage.
Tropes like the Sacrificial Negro were very common in film
history as these characters
that willingly sacrifice themselves to save the white protagonist.
The 1960s were also an incredibly turbulent time for African-Americans,
with riots popping up in Harlem, L.A., New Jersey, Detroit, and so on.
The film was released in 1968, which is the same year
that Martin Luther King was assassinated.
And so the movie encompassed a lot of the tension
that African-Americans were feeling at the time.
I was probably way too young to see it, but I was absolutely fascinated
by the fact that there was this beautiful, handsome black man.
That was the first time I probably saw
somebody black in a movie
and they weren't a criminal and they weren't a gangster,
and they were the hero.
From here, movies like Blacula became icons in the black community
where you have these intelligent,
in-depth characters that aren't just furniture,
and then you have the ending scene
of the Night of the Living Dead, where this white led mob comes
to take care of the zombies and shoot Ben right in the middle of the head.
Alright Vince hit 'em in the head.
right between the eyes.
Good shot.
Okay, he's dead. Let's go get him.
That's another one for the fire.
Which is such a strong message
about systematic racism in the United States.
As much as I love this topic, I'm afraid that I just won't do it justice
because there's just so much to talk about.
However, if you're interested in the Black history of horror films
I recommend watching Horror Noire where they discuss it in great detail
with these iconic black actors and actresses.
Night of the Living Dead encompassed the racial turmoil of the 1960s
and as the decade passed with more gruesome stories and terrifying
films with relatable characters, we moved into the 1970s
where some of the greatest classics and pioneers of the genre
were created.
♫ Tell me more, tell me more ♫
The Last House on the Left.
Take as much as you can.
the 1970s of Horror is one of the golden ages of the genre
out of the sheer amount of influential movies that came out during the decade.
This was also a time when horror movies started to become increasingly
more violent and graphic, leading to an influx of exploitation films.
These movies became more visceral because of the advent of television
and so having movies with more schlock that you couldn't see at home
helped fill in the seats.
Word of movies like The Last House on the Left spread like wildfire
through news stations and film critics with how extreme the movie was.
As a modern day viewer, I don't think you have to watch something
like the last House on the Left in order to appreciate the genre.
In fact, watching the trailer alone and thinking of what the movie
The Last House on the Left might be about and what scenes could be in
it is probably a better way to remember the film than the actual movie itself.
That's not to say that the movie wasn't influential.
It definitely helped shape this idea of
just how dark, twisted and unnerving could a movie get.
It also helped usher into this new exploitation category
of films called the Rape Revenge Subgenre, along with I Spit On Your Grave.
Not only did these movies spark this specific genre of films
it also began the creation of another subgenre called Backwoods,
along with one of the most influential horror films of all time.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre was like one of those
60 millimeter accident films they'd show you in school.
You know, the grain of it in that the saturated color of it
just really and I'd be having nightmares.
I mean, that was really like being alive when watching something
instead of something dead, like a Hollywood film.
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, released in 1974 by Tobe Hooper,
is a landmark movie in the horror genre.
An independent film that gained so much word of mouth due
to how much it disturbed people that it gained a wide theatrical release
and was subsequently banned by the British Board of Film Censors,
restricting the movie from being shown in theaters or on television in the UK.
If you're looking for a movie that captures the essence of Independent
low budget horror, it's The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
Everything about the movie feels so raw and uncomfortable with shots
that feel so visceral because it's visually grainy
aesthetic makes you feel as if you shouldn't be watching it.
I don't think that I will ever forget the scene where Leatherface first shows up
and whacks the guy in the head with a meat grinder
and the body just falls to the ground twitching, and then to see him
grab the body and shut the door with no explanation is just amazing to me
with how much the movie cost to make and how much buzz it received
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre became a financial success
in the next couple of years, even with its restrictions.
The movie sparked motivation in independent filmmakers
to create these strange and exploitive movies that push boundaries
so their movies can spread through word of mouth.
However, watching the movie nowadays, you'd be confused
about how this shocked so many people when it's so incredibly tame
For a movie with chainsaw in its name, there's barely any blood and gore in it.
Tobe Hooper actually intentionally made the movie tame with little to no gore,
no nudity and mild cursing, hoping to get a G rating, but ended up
getting an X and having to resubmit a cut version for it to have an R rating.
It also makes me sad that this movie was banned
from the British Board of Film Censors when movies came out a year
before that showed more undeniably graphic visuals than The Texas
Chainsaw Massacre with movies like The Exorcist, Jaws and Alien.
It really goes to show how much atmosphere can really lend itself
into making somebody feel uncomfortable, even when you're not seeing
someone being dismembered by a chainsaw on the screen.
In fact, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre wasn't legally available
to Britain in a DVD or VHS format until 1999.
That's more than 25 years since its theatrical release.
This heavy handed censorship of these independent horror films became
egregious as the decade went on, leading to the video nasties list of the 1980s.
These bands were targeted towards theatrical and VHS releases
and although this next film was never cut or banned in the UK
there were several attempts to stop its release from film to video.
The fact that people do wait for hours in line and then go back in
to see more after they've fainted or gotten sick, I guess it shows
how far some people will go for the thrill of being chilled to the bone.
And judging from my long night in the lobby,
the people most susceptible to being profoundly upset
by the film are those who went in believing in the devil.
The Exorcist was
released one year before the Texas Chainsaw Massacre in 1973
and became the first horror film to be nominated for Best Picture
which is a massive milestone for the genre.
When it comes to accolades and awards
it's been documented how much the genre has been shunned, with the Academy
generally looking down at the genre as subpar.
Stephen King once quoted his own son on Twitter saying, “It's true.”
“Horror is usually considered a ghetto genre.”
The thing about horror, and I think it's an interesting thing about the genre
is that
the best horror films to me are the best films ever made
and they're made by the best people like The Shining
Rosemary's Baby,
Hour of the Wolf
The Devils (Les Diabolique), Salo
These are films made by very important filmmakers and they're great movies.
The Exorcist is no slouch and deserves its nomination with its spine
tingling visuals following this tragic tale of Father Karras
trying to come to grips with his relationship with his own religion.
Reagan's monstrous menstruation as she moves into womanhood
and this amazing score using both
Mike Oldfield for Tubular Bells and Krzysztof Penderecki, The Exorcist's
use of Penderecki's orchestrated music was actually highly influential
and you can hear his music in The Shining
and some of David Lynch's works
For modern day horror
You can even hear how Penderecki's Polymorphia influenced the musical scores
of recent horror films
Out of the 95 Academy Awards
Only six horror movies have been nominated for Best Picture
in all of cinema history.
Horror films are more or less seen as cheap thrills with no substance
and The Exorcist was able to break that mold with its chilling atmosphere
and the unsettling
thought of what could happen if your child was possessed by the devil.
Damien!
Amen.
I think my favorite scene from The Exorcist is when the drawer opens.
Did you do that?
Do it again.
In time.
No, now.
In time.
There's just something in the way that Reagan
repeats in time that just gives me chills.
The movie is so beautiful to watch
and breaks ground as a pioneer of the possession subgenre
followed up by The Omen, The Amityville Horror and more
recently, movies like The Exorcism of Emily Rose.
It's also a film that implies its themes of monstrous menstruation
along with Carrie that was released in 1976.
Movie centered around the idea that a woman's first period is like her
coming of age and that this menstruation is a dramatic change in their body and attitude.
Reagan literally transforms into this demonic entity on her 12th birthday.
Carrie does the same thing, but it's more apparent
with its opening scene when she gets her first period and the women
in the locker room begin throwing tampons at her and chanting
It also marks the
time that she begins to develop her kinetic powers.
We're alll sorry about this incident, Cassie.
It's Carrie!
Ginger Snaps is another monstrous menstruation film
released in 2000 where this high school girl gets bitten by a werewolf
and we watch her literally transform into this monster while drawing a parallel
to receiving her first period.
Oh, shit.
Ridley Scott's Alien
released in 1979 as a commercial success, but had mixed reviews from critics
even though it's now considered to be one of
if not the greatest science fiction film ever created.
Its isolation of space, phallic and vaginal
images of fear from these creatures forcibly impregnating its victims
caused a large sense of dread throughout the film.
[muffled breathing]
The hell is that?
Although usually eclipsed by its action packed sequel, Aliens
Alien is a horror film classic that continues to exceed expectations
even with the modern day viewing.
The movie features
a lot of visceral images made to induce panic.
Ridley Scott made a conscious decision to have the film feature multiple
phallic and vaginal imagery in order to make audience members feel uncomfortable.
The entire idea of these aliens planting their parasites inside of
people is a deliberate play on the male fears of female reproduction.
The facehugger orally rape Cain
and impregnate him through sexual domination
and is later penetrated again, but this time with a phallic looking alien
coming out of his chest.
Oh God.
You'll also notice that the final form of the alien also contains
both phallic and vaginal imagery, which is supposed to cause fear
and anxiety with people as a response to sexual openness.
Alien is a cultural icon and has been referenced in various forms
of media for its beloved franchise and won an Academy Award in Special Effects.
While theaters in the U.S.
were hogged up by The Exorcist
Alien in Jaws, which would become the first Hollywood blockbuster.
Italian horror cinema began to flourish with its provocative visuals
and blood drenched victims.
Violent and graphic, but also visually striking.
I'll never forget the opening credits of Blood and Black Lace with its bright
red mannequins and green plants
or the scene in The Bird With The Crystal Plumage
where the protagonist sees the stabbed woman crawling on the floor
while he's trapped in this bright white prison.
A popular trend during this time were what's called Giallo films
which is like the equivalent meaning of something like a spaghetti Western.
You might have heard of recent films paying homage
to this subgenre, like Last Night in Soho and Malignant.
Giallo films were thrillers mixed with horror fiction and eroticism, usually
based around a killer whose identity is revealed at the end of the movie.
One could say that psycho and Peeping Tom were direct influences to Giallo films
especially the visual style of Peeping Tom predating the subgenre.
Visually, Giallo films have a specific style
of using surreal colors to create dreamlike atmospheres
Voyeurism, zoom ins on people's eyes, disorienting
framing and graphic, stylized violence.
Giallo movies aren't necessarily
the best works of cinema and a lot of them don't age very well.
The films are infamously dubbed over even in Italian, so they can reach a wider
spread of audiences, making the dialogue never quite match the actors mouths.
Care for a coffee?
Ah, thanks I would.
In fact, it's just what I need.
I've been up all night.
The movies would have actors and actresses perform in their native tongues
and then dub those over in order to appeal to a wider audience.
And so if you're watching an Italian film
and feel like the mouths don't match up, your mind isn't playing tricks on you.
That's just the way Italian films are made.
What do you think about before you fall asleep?
My father.
???
You mind if I watch TV?
Add in some splashes of color
a mysterious killer
brutal deaths
and lots and lots and lots of zoom ins on people's eyes.
And you've got a giallo movie.
This type of film is incredibly influential
on the horror genre because of its radical amount of stylization
and it's a precursor to the slasher subgenre as they use
these mysterious murderers to kill off their characters.
Very prominent Italian directors would lend their hand into this
giallo subgenre like Dario Argento, Mario Bava,
Sergio Martino and Lucio Fulci.
That is uh Herschell Gordon Lewis, he is the ultimate master of horror.
Please.
Dario Argento is so the ultimate master of horror
Argento?
He's. He's all right.
Although not considered a Giallo film for its supernatural plot
Suspiria is a perfect representation of seventies Italian horror
by showing these fantastical, terrifying images.
Bright red blood, almost like paint, reminiscent of hammer films
long hallways with tall rooms to elaborate on these Gothic settings
and repeating color patterns makes watching Suspiria
give you a sense of dread in this nightmarish dreamscape.
The expressionism of using bright splashes of red, blue, green and yellow
for these surreal scenes helped elevate the movie's more visceral parts
into something fear inducing.
The movie famously strikes inspiration for its color palette from Disney's Snow
White and the Seven Dwarves.
With these colorful settings for morbid scenes,
I know that I'm going to get crucified for this, but I'm going to be honest.
I am not a fan of Suspiria.
I mean, like, I'm okay with it.
It's just like, not my favorite Argento movie.
I think that the movie has amazing art direction
but its narrative makes almost no sense at all.
It's beautifully shot and one of the last films that use Technicolor.
So on that merit alone, it should be viewed at least once for any horror fan.
Plus, the soundtrack for Goblin is just awesome,
but really, I prefer the sequel to Suspiria Inferno so much more
because it's just as visually striking but has a way more coherent narrative.
In fact, I actually enjoy Argento's other films more
than I enjoy Suspiria, like Deep Red, Tenebrae,
The Bird of the Crystal plumage, Phenomena and Opera.
I still think that Suspiria is visually fantastic and its influence
can't be understated and
if you enjoy Suspiria and like dreamy trance
like films, I recommend watching the Japanese movie House.
Released in 1977, the same year as Suspiria.
Much like Suspiria, the plot doesn't make much sense and it's such a strange movie
but it's also so strange that I love it with all my heart.
I'm not going to explain it because I honestly don't think
it's possible, but the soundtrack slaps so hard.
Visually, the movie is fantastical.
Its graphics are so out there that it kind of just adds to its charm.
And oddly enough, it was also co-written by the director's ten year old daughter.
Which I suppose is one of the reasons
why the characters feel like it was written by a child.
If you enjoy things like analog horror, this is right up your alley and
I just can't gush about this movie enough, even though by all accounts I should hate it.
I just can't get it out of my head.
Italian horror and the Giallo subgenre heavily influenced the slasher
genre of the 1980s, but it's also been referenced in more modern films.
Kill Bill Volume one, for example, calls upon imagery
from these films, and Tarantino even goes as far as to use the song
Seven Black Notes from the movie Murder in the Seven Notes of Black
by Lucio Fulci.
The scene in Death Proof, where stuntman Mike takes pictures of his victims
is a direct reference to the killer in The Bird with the Crystal Plumage.
Even movies like Scream use these Giallo films as an influence
for its black gloved killer of Ghostface.
The slasher subgenre is one of the largest and most popular of the horror genre
identified by its high body count
use of sex
drugs, alcohol and violence.
Based around a final girl
using a female virgin who has to overcome the killer in the film's climax.
Black Christmas, directed by Bob Clarke, who would go on to direct
A Christmas Story, is by all accounts, one of the greatest of the subgenre
and I recommend any fan of horror movies to revisit it
if you've seen it already
and if you're new to the genre to give it a shot.
The movie follows a sorority house during Christmas break, being stalked
by a stranger who harasses them over the phone before murdering them.
An idea later replicated to popularity in 1996 with Wes Craven's Scream
although the killer in Black
Christmas called with a more profane use of harassment.
I'll stick my tongue up your pretty pussy!
You fucking creep!
Throughout the film, the women at the sorority get picked off one by one
as the stranger continually harasses them with these strange phone calls.
For such a simple plot, the movie feels pretty advanced
for its time with its interesting camerawork predating Halloween.
along with the themes and topics that it explores, for example
the lead protagonist is pregnant and confides in her boyfriend
that she wants an abortion.
Already it's a pretty progressive topic and really stands the test of time
as she argues with her boyfriend on how she doesn't want to keep the baby
while he objectifies her
by trying to force her to have the child and become domesticated.
And I told you about some of the things that I wanted to do.
I still want to do those things.
You can't ask me to drop everything I've been working for
and give up all my ambitions because your plans have changed.
Be realistic.
I can't marry you.
Sure you can.
What does it change?
Although it's not very graphic and is pretty tame for a modern viewing
Black Christmas stands the test of time and its influence
reaches farther than you would think.
For example, the movie opens up with this shot of a
sorority house during Christmas and moves into a tracking P.O.V.
Shot of our Killer, a sequence replicated in the 1978
classic that revolutionized the genre.
I met this
six year old child with this
blank, pale, emotionless face and
the blackest eyes,
the devil's eyes.
At this point, what isn't there that can be said about this movie
that really hasn't already been said?
Halloween is a horror classic, not because it's particularly scary
to a modern day audience, but
because of how inventive and progressive the movie is with its low budget.
What really sets the movie apart is the soundtrack
which really helps elevate the film becoming
one of the most recognized motion picture soundtracks ever created.
With the growing popularity of the synthesizer and electronic music
in the seventies and eighties,
it really defined the soundtrack of horror films at the time.
This is a big reason as to why I enjoy seventies
and eighties Italian horror because the music just slaps
like Halloween's soundtrack.
John Carpenter's Halloween was filmed on a budget of 300,000
and couldn't afford to have an orchestra or studio compose the film's score.
Instead inspired by The Exorcist soundtrack and music from the band Goblin
Carpenter created the movie's iconic Halloween soundtrack on his own
in the span of three days.
While the film was shot in exactly 20 days.
Just looking at the ground filled with dead leaves
when the trees are visibly green and healthy really adds to its charm.
The Halloween requel in 2018 actually pays homage to this by replicating the same look.
When you compare both Halloween and Black Christmas to each other
the films have such similar qualities it's hard to not point them out.
In fact, Bob Clark even stated that when he was talking to John Carpenter
who loved Black Christmas, Carpenter asked if Clark was going to make a sequel
to it, which he wasn't, and Clark said it would be the next year
and the guy would have actually been caught.
Escape from a mental institution.
Go back to the house and they would start all over again.
And I would call it Halloween.
That's not to say or confirmed that Carpenter took the idea from Clark at all.
They're both amazing directors,
and the movie's really just couldn't be further apart.
However, interestingly enough, although Halloween
popularized the slasher genre, the tropes you would come to know of this subgenre
wouldn't become cemented until the 1980s, when the horror
genre exploded.
By the time that the eighties rolled around,
technological advances finally caught up with horror.
Movies were more visually visceral.
Special effects became the forefront of films with gore and schlock
Where the seventies had movies that showed little to no Gore.
The eighties were filled with as much as you could handle, sometimes a little too much.
So much so that the British Board of Film Censors cracked
down on their bans, resulting in what's called the video nasties.
This Was a collection of low budget horror films that the BBFC
gave authorities as a guideline of what movies were banned from Britain.
Containing films such as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Cannibal Holocaust,
The Last House on the Left, Inferno,
Zombie and the Evil Dead.
Although not every movie was banned from the UK in the video nasties list,
the BBFC would publish more lists to add onto the video nasties
as films that could be confiscated or destroyed by officers of the law.
Movies like Maniac would be banned for cinemas in 1981 again in 1998,
released with 58 seconds of cuts in 2002
and was only released Uncut in 2022.
There was so much shock, gore and exploitation
in the eighties of horror films and the advent of VHS
made it difficult to control what was being put out at the time,
and one franchise helped make it all the more difficult.
Well, if that's the way you feel.
Forget it Vic.
Just forget it!
But I think you're really out of line.
Sean Cunningham, one of the co-producers of the Last House
on the Left, directed the 1980 film Friday the 13th.
One of the longest running horror franchises of all time
Made to capitalize on the hype of Halloween
Cunningham reportedly took an ad out in a newspaper
to sell a movie with just the name Friday the 13th and no script to back it up.
And Sean called me up and said,
Halloween is making incredible money at the box office.
Let's rip it off.
That is keeping it real.
Luckily for Cunningham, the movie was a giant success and by 1990
the franchise would have eight installments
releasing almost every single year during the decade.
Jason Voorhees would become a horror movie icon, one of the first,
along with Michael Myers and Freddy Krueger
since the Universal Monster Classics, to the point where
it would be more difficult to find someone that doesn't know who he is.
And with a lot of horror movie franchises.
You know, the original movie is usually the best.
However.
Friday the 13th is not one of those cases.
I think it's actually insane how bad the first Friday the 13th actually is.
There's really no effective scares throughout the whole movie
besides the startling ending where Jason comes out of the water and that's it.
Also, God bless Tom Savini that the effects are awesome.
Jason isn't even in the first film until then, and Mrs.
Voorhees is such a flat character that you just don't care about her at all.
The acting isn't necessarily good.
The story isn't necessarily groundbreaking and its cinematography
isn't anything to write home about.
It's just a sleazy 80's slasher film
and that's really the charm of the movies.
The Friday the 13th franchise is best described as a sum of its parts
and not necessarily about its individual pieces.
Its predecessors in Halloween, Psycho Black Christmas and Peeping
Tom were a lot more classy
and put the story first instead of focusing on the death scenes.
Friday the 13th went in the opposite direction and instead filled the movies
with these terrible unlikable teenage characters to the point
where you begin rooting for Jason to come in and wreak havoc.
The Friday the 13th movies
are very comforting to me, so I'm a bit biased on these films.
Personally, I think that the movie's don't hit their stride
until part four during the Tommy Jarvis arc and onwards, where they kind of
just go sicko mode like Jason X is MUAH
I actually recommend most people watch the remake of the Friday
the 13th from 2009 because it sums up parts one through three so well.
And so then that way you don't have to watch them
and it's significantly better than its originals.
The franchise is just so cheesy and fun that you can't help
but enjoy the ridiculousness, like in part four where there's a death scene
where the character just starts shouting, “He's killing me!”
Part seven where he fights someone with telekinetic powers
Part 6 where Tommy just accidentally reanimates Jason and the second he wakes up
he just chooses violence
Part eight has some of the most brutal killings, and seeing Jason
in Times Square is just worth every penny in my opinion
even if a majority of the movie takes place on a boat.
Also, just watching Jason's costume slowly deteriorate
over the course of the movies is so much fun with his mask
becoming like damaged, broken and gross by the eighth film.
It's just all mindless fun made to entertain with no other meanings behind it.
and that's something that I can really appreciate sometimes.
Commercial horror films in the eighties were flooded with these large slasher
franchises like Friday the 13th Nightmare on Elm Street and Halloween.
Child's Play would release in 1988, but its franchise wouldn't really grow
until the nineties, when its sequels began
to be released more frequently.
Much to the same vain as Hellraiser.
Other smaller slasher franchises would also fill up the horror genre roster
during the eighties, with movies like Sleepaway Camp and Silent Night
Deadly Night, which would garner cult followings within the horror community.
The slasher genre would be packed with terrible additions that were made
to just make quick money from studios, which is what led to a huge backlash
from censors because they were made so quickly
and cheaply with a fast turnaround time to flood the market, especially
when direct to video films became a lot more common during the mid-eighties.
These films would capitalize on nudity and gore as their main focus of the movie,
with these provocative VHS covers that entice people to watch them.
We certainly saw in 1982 a series of videos which depicted
mutilation.
It depicted death, it depicted violence, which we felt enough was enough
and took action to stop the growing spread of this form of violence.
This one is the controversial Evil dead, and this one, perhaps
more horrific, is a film called The Entity in a Coffin Shaped Box.
It's about repeated rape by a brutal force.
These particular type of video nasties
are certainly very degrading to women.
I also believe very firmly that they must have
some effect on a certain small section of our community.
The minister, who was speaking here at the Department of Justice,
also said he believes these videos has had a direct bearing
on some of the more violent crimes that have been committed,
especially crimes against women.
However, during this time of schlock, there were a lot of hidden gems
that lurked within its poopy depths that would later gain a cult following
such as Maniac, April Fool's Day, My Bloody Valentine,
The Prowler and Slumber Party Massacre, just to name a few.
Just one little beer.
Courtney, you're underage.
Negative. Come on let's go.
After creating The Hills Have Eyes in '77
Wes Craven would return to the genre in 1984 in his new film
that turned your dreams into terrifying dreamscapes with A Nightmare on Elm Street
Nancy?
What, Mother?
Don't fall asleep in there.
A Nightmare on Elm Street really does a great job of encapsulating
everything about the eighties, but turning it into a more visceral
and supernatural experience while still writing the tropes of the slasher genre.
'84s Nightmare compared to the eighties
Friday the 13th is such a huge difference in cinema
when you compare the two slasher films together.
Even though Nightmare never the same franchise height as Friday the 13th did.
Although most slasher films during this time took a more realism
based approach to their films, akin to what Giallo movies did.
Nightmare on Elm Street went with a more surrealist approach
to the slasher subgenre, adding in these supernatural elements
to progress the story
which is what really separates itself from the rest of the movies in the genre.
There's actually been a recent trend in slasher films that have begun to follow
a Nightmare on Elm Street Steps by adding in surreal or supernatural elements
into their movies that other, more realism based slashers don't tread into.
The Fear Street trilogy uses supernatural elements in their slasher
based storyline.
Terrifier 2 turns Art the Clown into a supernatural
being with connections to demonic entities.
Happy Death Day uses
a supernatural occurrence to tell its time looping story and freaky adds
a supernatural ritual to add on to its slasher based story with a body swap.
When it comes to slasher franchises, a Nightmare on Elm
Street is definitely one of the better ones
with Wes Craven even returning with a new nightmare in 1994.
That's pretty much a rough draft for his later film
Scream, with its meta commentary on horror films.
And I did feel like an assassin.
I would load up my car
with my tools and go some strange place and kill people, you know?
And the teenagers loved it.
Like on Friday the 13th, the teenagers would come up and on,
How am I going to die? They were so they wanted.
They were so excited about how they're going to die.
And the juicier the better, the gorier, the better.
One of the biggest proponents to horror films during the eighties
was its embracement of special effects, and three artists would rise
to the occasion as the most influential special effects artists of their time.
Tom Savini, Rob Bottin and Rick Baker.
Tom Savini had already broken into the film industry
special effects department thanks to his innovative effects in George
Romero's 1978 classic Dawn of the Dead and the original Friday the 13th.
But his pinnacle of work comes from his return to the zombie
subgenre in the 1985 film Day of the Dead,
bringing his signature style of vivid realism to the genre.
Day of the Dead special effects put his earlier work on Dawn of the Dead to shame
with these insanely graphic effects that still live up to this day.
Creating a name for himself.
Starting with movies like The Prowler and Maniac
Savini's work would become more apparent through commercial films
like 1982's Creepshow and now leads his own special effects
program at the Douglas Education Center in Pennsylvania.
Rick Baker would also become a household name for special effects
artists with work from An American Werewolf in London.
I didn't mean to call you Meatloaf, Jack.
He's responsible for the effects of the Cronenberg classic Videodrome,
Men in Black, The Ring and How the Grinch Stole Christmas.
His apprentice, Rob Bottin, would also lend his hand in helping
to revolutionize practical special effects in films, starting with The Howling,
which appeared five months before An American Werewolf in London
where Rick also has a similar transformation scene
since they were both working on the same kind of effect together.
One of his most notable pieces of work comes from John Carpenter's
1982 cult classic
clear
Released in 1982
The thing came out with a whimper with negative reviews from critics
for its excessive use of body horror special effects.
At the time of its release, the film's concepts of paranoia,
isolation and groupthink added with mindblowing special effects
and a slow burn went completely over audience's heads and was constantly
compared to science fiction movies released at the time, like Alien, E.T.
and Blade Runner. Much like many horror films
Critics openly bashed the movie and immediately disregarded it
as any form of art.
I think that's probably an understatement.
I would call this the Barf bag movie of July.
I have some problems with it.
One of them is, I think the characters,
they're not made into three dimensional people.
Their function is to walk down the corridor and be jumped on.
The other thing is plausibility.
Once they figure out that this thing can turn into one of them,
they ought to institute a watertight buddy system
and instead they have all kinds of loopholes.
People walk out into the snow,
come back with a grin on their face, so that the story is totally implausible.
And the movie just basically
is an excuse for the very gruesome and repellent creature to gross us out.
It is the most nauseating thing I've ever seen on a movie screen.
I think that's quite a statement. I think I think I'll stand by. Yeah.
I think the film's technical achievements and special effects
were taken as visually repulsive and excessive by critics
leading to the movie being torn to shreds over the immediate years of its release.
It even led to Carpenter losing his job of directing the 1984
film Firestarter because of how poorly the thing performed.
The poor performance also prompted Universal Pictures to buy out
Carpenter from his multiple motion picture deal with the company.
The critically acclaimed failure of the thing actually considerably lowered
Carpenter's confidence with both audience
members and critics openly bashing the film with scathing reviews.
It wasn't until the movie found its audience on home video
that the thing became regarded as one of the greatest horror films of all time.
And as we've seen throughout this video, this is a very common practice
that critics did with horror movies that are now universally considered
as culturally impactful and significant films.
Here's Johnny
on release
The Shining was also a critically acclaimed failure
and is one of the only films
of Stanley Kubrick that was not mentioned for an Academy Award.
Stephen King openly despised the film, which was a huge deal at the time,
considering how much weight his words had on Western media.
Although the film and the book are drastically different art forms
it really cannot be denied that Kubrick was out to make his own movie
and not an adaptation of the famous Stephen King novel.
Still, The Shining is a masterclass of psychological horror
that transcends time being as good as it is, even with a modern day viewing.
Much like misery and The Thing's setting, The Shining uses snow
to isolate these characters and then adds in this supernatural house
of horrors, in a slow burn of tension that builds throughout the film.
The hotel becomes its own character in the movie
feeling as alive as Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall.
For example, Kubrick implements these wide shots in closed corridors
to present the hotel's oppression, making the hallways feel almost endless.
Exit signs are plastered all throughout the film to show
the urgency of the family needing to escape the hotel's grasp.
Chandeliers are constantly shown subtly above
character's heads to perpetuate this looming dread.
Kubrick consistently breaks the rule of thirds when showing characters
by instead of placing the actors within the frame of thirds,
he purposefully places them into the literal center of the frame
causing viewer to feel dread with how much emptiness
is shown on the screen, leading to further visual isolation.
The same visual concept is actually adopted in Jordan Peele's latest film, Nope.
Showcasing these characters in these barren landscapes, isolated
and surrounded by this dread represented by the vast emptiness of their location.
A frame within a frame is also constantly used throughout the movie.
Symmetrical composition is accomplished using a single point perspective,
making the viewer uneasy with its uncanny valley representation of reality.
To help better understand the use of these techniques.
First, let's talk about the single point perspective,
also known as the one point perspective, or vice versa.
Most commonly associated with photography and painting, it's the concept of objects
relative to your perspective with a vanishing point.
One of the earliest renditions of this is The Last Supper from Leonardo da Vinci.
We have the vanishing point of the horizon with Jesus's head
displayed in the middle.
This gives a one point perspective where our eyes
are immediately drawn to the center of the frame.
You can also see what's called leading lines from the ceiling and the side decor
to subtly push your gaze towards the center of the frame.
This was also the defining moment before Jesus was crucified,
giving the image a foreboding sense of feeling.
However, this is still painting,
and film is different with the addition of movement.
Kubrick uses this one point perspective in almost
every movie he makes to give off a foreboding sense of anxiety
by having his viewers be attracted towards a single point on the screen.
However, this sense
of foreboding atmosphere happens when you add in the addition of movement,
but then remove that movement, which then perpetuates anxiety.
We are fixed on this area and expect movement from either characters
or the camera.
And while we wait for this to happen, it creates a buildup of anxiety
through an uncanny valley perspective of reality.
Forcing viewers to focus on the center of the screen, to highlight
the importance of the subject, or to give off feelings of uneasiness.
And sometimes he uses
all of these aspects in the same shot to layer the tension of the scene.
By all accounts, The Shining is a very loud movie and uses
both diegetic and non-diegetic sounds to entice panic, fear,
isolation and confusion.
Diegetic audio is sound that is placed
within the context of the story and able to be heard by characters.
In this scene, we can hear the loud and ominous sound of Jack
tossing a tennis ball against the hotel's wall.
Inducing a sense of fear with the character and setting
while giving the hotel more of a physical presence in the film.
In the scene where Danny rides a tricycle through the hotel, we have diegetic sounds of
the tricycle being muffled by the carpet, interrupted by these loud stabs of sound
when the wheels hit the hardwood floor.
When Jack and Wendy are speaking to each other in this giant room
of the hotel, notice how much they pause in between their exchange.
Don't be so grouchy.
I'm not being grouchy.
I just want to finish my work.
Okay.
I understand
the echo of their conversation at the end of their sentences
further pushes not only the family's isolation from the outside world, but
also the separation of the relationship between Wendy and Jack.
These are all tools that Kubrick used throughout his filmography
and are used by modern day directors like Wes Anderson,
who uses the concept of symmetry on a regular basis.
As horror slashers and
movies far ahead of their time were released in theaters
the horror genre saw a huge boom in the eighties
however, independent horror became more accessible as
a new form of home media began to grow at a rapid pace.
Keep fogging.
And when I yell for the stop, stop it.
Fog it.
Stop!
Most horror films are about people being picked off.
But, you know, Evil Dead is essentially about one actor being picked on
you know, And it's kind of like Sam, you know, antagonizing his best friend from school.
In 1978 two long longtime friends by the name of Bruce Campbell
and Sam Raimi went out into the woods with a couple of their friends in Marshal Michigan
to create the short film Within the Woods.
The proof of concept to gain interest with investors
and in 1981, they released the groundbreaking feature film, The Evil Dead.
A cabin hidden away in the woods,
a book inked in blood and bound with human flesh,
a tape recorder recollecting horrific events, summoning an evil entity
hellbent on dragging you and your friends into the deepest depths of hell.
The Evil Dead and its sequels The Evil Dead two and Army of Darkness
became cult classics, lauded as some of the best horror cinema has to offer.
The Evil Dead's placement onto the video nasties list gave the film even more publicity
when it reached the home
video market and garnered more favorable reviews as time went on.
The story of Sam and Bruce creating this film, this like phenomena of cinema,
is basically the filmmaker's equivalent of a fairy tale.
Just a couple of kids with nothing but their ambitions and dedication
going through long months of this grueling work to create this cinematic wonder.
Whenever you get the chance, I highly recommend listening
to some of the commentary on the Evil Dead franchise.
Just hearing about all the innovative
camera work that they accomplish on it, like a shoestring budget.
All the special effects.
There's even like stop motion.
It's really astounding.
I could literally talk for hours about the franchise.
I mean, when I first watched the movie when I was like
15, it completely blew me away because really, there's
absolutely nothing like the Evil Dead even to this day.
The franchise is one of the most beloved horror film franchises to ever
bless the genre with its blend of slapstick
comedy as an appreciation of Three Stooges from Raimi and Bruce,
along with the splatploitation or splatter subgenre that it helped
pioneer as movies with a lot of gross liquids and bodily dismemberment.
Movies like Braindead and Re-Animator heavily
lean into this subgenre as a comedic form of cinema
parties over
the eighties were a boon for horror films, as commercial movies
constantly hit theaters and independent horror began to grow on VHS.
As we move into the nineties,
where video stores like Blockbuster and Hollywood Video made these films
more easily obtainable for moviegoers, as well as the advent of television
where the films could be shown on cable to a new generation
of film watchers
-a turtle!
My girlfriend sucked 37 d-
Now this is podracing
The nineties paved the way to the advent of the Internet, television
and in terms of horror, was burned out towards the end of the eighties.
The nineties marked the end of both the millennia and century where surprisingly
a lot of children's horror and horror on television became more prominent.
Horror TV shows aimed at children became extremely common with Tales
from the Crypt Keeper, a children's
spin off of Tales from the Crypt on HBO, which was a household success
on television, bringing horror onto the small screen.
Are You Afraid of The Dark? also attacked children with uncomfortable imagery.
Goosebumps not only became a young adults favorite book series, but its TV show
also attempted to scare and frighten children with these fun ghost stories.
Cartoons such as Courage, The Cowardly Dog, and Aaahh!!! Real Monsters
brought these ideas of horrific events and turned them into comedic ones,
even though they had
very disturbing scenes that young watchers remember all too well.
Being born in 91, these shows are very important to me
because they're what made me interested in the horror genre.
I don't even know why.
This was a huge trend in the nineties and couldn't
find information that draws a direct line of why the occurrence happened
but if I had to guess, it was probably because of how popular R.L.
Stine books were for children at the time, and so TV studios
wanted to capitalize on it.
The Halloween specials of TV shows became my favorite episodes,
like Boy Meets World.
They're trapped inside of their school with a masked killer
Our soon to be first victim.
Me. Why me?
Well Kenny, it's certainly not going to be any of us.
The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror is was always something that I look forward
to every October.
Even Disney released a considerable amount of horror films aimed at children
like Hocus Pocus, Halloweentown and Don't Look Under the Bed.
A film that parents thought was too frightening for children
and so Disney pulled the movie out of its October circulation by 2006.
Do you think I look a little strange?
Starting with Salem's Lot in 1979
Stephen King novels also received televised movie adaptations or miniseries
which plagued people's minds in the nineties, like Misery's scene
of hobbling Paul Sheldon or the nightmare inducing images of It
starring Tim Curry
Outside of television, audience members became a lot more tired of the genre
because of the large influx of cheap commercial slasher films from the eighties
and needed new life breathed into the genre.
A census taker once tried to test me.
I ate his liver with some fava beans
and a nice chianti.
Silence of the Lambs, released in 1991, was the first horror
film to receive an Academy Award for Best Picture.
However, the Academy Awards
hate horror films, and so the movie was purposefully marketed
as a thriller instead of a horror film to increase its chances of winning awards.
Orion Pictures even went as far as to prohibit Fangoria magazine
a chance to cover the movie out of fear it would be deemed as a horror film.
Fearing that the movie would be disregarded during that year's
season of the Academy with the increase of slanderous critiques of the genre.
Obviously,
I am very biased to this opinion because I think that's complete horseshit.
Any film that reaches some kind of academy recognition,
even when the films are supposed to elicit thoughts of fear and dread, are
then somehow turned into thrillers over time because of these
negative connotations of the horror genre.
And like, usually I don't enjoy categorizing,
forcing movies into different genres because it's pretty silly
to force movies into like these different categories.
However, the treatment of horror
films throughout motion picture history is fucking frustrating
with how Academy Awards are towards the genre.
I wouldn't be surprised if like in ten or 20 years Get Out
would also no longer be considered a horror film.
Well, I'm getting ready to watch a video.
Really? What?
Oh, just some scary movie.
Do you like scary movies?
What's your favorite scary movie?
I don't know.
You have to have a favorite.
What comes to mind?
Wes Craven returned to the horror genre once again with Scream in 1996,
becoming an instant hit and reviving a genre that had grown tired
and repetitive while also being an ode to the horror films of the past.
Even if it can be a little on the nose.
Huh?
Not you Fred.
Scream is the perfect introductory horror film and is always my go to
for recommending movies of the genre to people who are interested in horror films.
First off, it has an astounding opening scene.
That's one of the best. Cold opens to a movie period.
Not only are we pulled into this story with a character that a modern day
audience can connect with
in the first 12 minutes, it sets up the rest of the plot of the film.
What Scream does really well is that it really brings
a lot of love to the genre by using elements from past films
and bringing them back to life, like the harassing phone calls
from Black Christmas.
While elevating the genre to new heights.
We all go a little mad sometimes.
No, Billy!
Oh, fuck.
The follow up to
the original with Scream 2 also holds very iconic scenes
in the franchise and subverts expectations of these legacy characters
by putting them in real danger instead of skirting around the topic.
Where the original Scream sets up the audiences and genre
fans is love for the character Randy, it makes his death in the sequel
all that more impactful. Showing audiences that no one in the franchise is safe while
also becoming a master class in building tension around these beloved characters.
Why are you even here Randy, you'll never be the leading man.
Fuck you.
Dissecting the scene, we see three legacy characters in
Randy, Gale and Dewey being joined by Gale's new cameraman, Joel.
In the scene of Randy's demise
we notice all of these safety nets for these characters
that become visually unraveled throughout the scene.
It's set in broad daylight, a safe setting for the characters to not be murdered.
The characters are all surrounded by other people in a public setting.
The characters are together, providing more of their safety in numbers.
Joel, a new character, is set into the scene as a buffer for the audience
so that if something bad did happen, he's there to fill in the bloodshed
instead of our legacy
characters in Randy, Gale and Dewey.
First, Joel leaves after the three begin discussing the recent murders,
removing the buffer character from these legacy characters
and putting them within harms reach.
When the killer calls to harass the characters
they realize that they're being watched and so they separate
to try and capture the killer.
Which then unravels another layer to the audience's safety net.
Visually, Randy's character becomes more isolated as this seemingly safe
public with innocent people becomes a place of likely suspects.
Too slow, geek.
Shots of the news van or Randy's place of death
are seen very sparingly until we reach the climax of the scene
and to finally close the sequence when Randy is
taken into the news van to be murdered by the killer
we see people walking past the van in broad daylight as Randy is
stabbed to death, showing that public places in broad daylight aren't sure
tickets of survival.
What's so endearing
about the 1996 scream as that it actively tells you the rules
while simultaneously
breaking them, deconstructing not only the genre, but also itself.
You can never drink or do drugs.
Who's there?
You should never say, “Who's there?” Don't you watch scary movies?
It's a death wish.
Number one
You can never have sex.
No, It's just, what's the point?
They're all the same.
Some stupid killer stalking
some big breasted girl
who can act who's always running up the stairs
when she should be going out the front door. It's insulting.
Never, ever, ever, under any circumstances.
Say, I'll be right back, because you won't be back.
I'm getting another beer.
You want one?
Yes, sure.
I'll be right back.
Scream is a very important part of the horror genre
because it really helped elevate the movies that came after it
to create more dynamic and interesting characters
instead of just sending random stereotypical people out to the slaughter.
A movie that really encompasses this new age of intelligent characters
is Robert Rodriguez, His 1998 film, The Faculty.
Written by Kevin Williamson, the same writer for the film Scream and Dawson's Creek.
The faculty pits a group of high school kids
against alien race that can take over the bodies of any living creature,
much like Invasion of the Body Snatchers or the Thing.
However, the characters are fully aware of the genre.
What makes the faculty stand out among the slasher revival of the nineties
Like I Know What You Did Last Summer, Halloween: H2O and Urban Legends
Is that the characters are written pretty well
with a star studded cast of Josh Arnett, Jordana Brewster,
Elijah Wood, Salma Hayek, Robert Patrick and even a young Usher.
For the most part, the main characters make smart decisions and are intelligent
like Josh Arnett's character of a sleazy drug dealer
who also understands anatomy and chemistry.
Elijah Wood's character is a nerdy school photographer who isn't just killed off
to up the body count and steps into more of a leader role in the group.
Although the movie can look hokey with its outdated CGI during its climax,
the film still holds up extremely well with a modern day viewing.
These more elevated characters and stories can also be seen in the 1992
film Candyman, another horror film created
and based on the mind of Clive Barker, who wrote and directed Hellraiser
based off of his novella The Hellbound Heart.
The story is quite short.
It's quite brief, and it was set in Liverpool,
which was Clive's hometown, and we changed the setting
to Chicago in the USA.
I went, I went to Chicago and I researched housing projects in Chicago
and I came across the notorious Cabrini-Green housing development.
And then, of course, Candyman
became an African American.
So that gave the whole film a very different tone
to the way the original story was written, which was basically about,
you know, poor liverpudlians in housing projects.
Candyman based on the short story, The Forbidden by Clive Barker
is a supernatural and psychological horror film centered
around the idea of how the mythical beliefs of characters and monsters are
what gives them strength.
This is the same idea that Freddy Krueger is basically based off
of where he needs people to believe in him in order to even exist
and the lack of this fear is what drains of his power.
Mixing this urban decay of low income housing, along with the mysticism
of Candyman, played by the amazing Tony Todd, is what sends film
into a higher status.
The nineties were a turning point in black representation in horror films
with movies like Wes Craven's The People Under the Stairs, Candyman
and Tales from the Hood, implementing better representation of people
of color compared to the slasher films of the eighties
that casted people of color into side roles and marginalized them.
However, in the nineties, horror films became more inclusive,
tackling these ideas of police brutality
Mother fucker are you out of your damn mind?
Racist politicians and the black fear of white spaces.
I was recently listening to the commentary of Bernard
Rose and Tony Todd on the film and found this specific piece interesting.
It's very easy to do to come up behind somebody
and go “Boo” and make a loud noise and they'll all go
ah!
And it was it's easier now than it was then
because the sound systems have improved.
Back then, you couldn't really do it
because when you were dealing with the kind of sound systems
that were available on a 35mm print with a dolby mix
you couldn't actually make somebody jump with the sound alone.
So but now the whole sound is like you can make every creak-
I don't know if this has any form of basis.
However, it's an interesting theory that makes a lot of sense
and a topic that I'd like to look into further in the future.
Although the title Tales from the Hood from 1995
sounds like the film would be a Wayne's Brothers parody.
The movie is actually a sophisticated anthology film
that tackled problematic concepts within the African-American community.
Each story focused on topics such as police corruption,
domestic abuse, racism and gang violence.
So you're not afraid of the ghost?
Oh well, the only spooks I'm afraid of
are you spooky reporters.
However, the movie was poorly marketed, leading to the film doing horribly in
theaters, but gained a cult following throughout the years and is now recognized
as an early adopter of social commentary for African-Americans
in the horror genre.
Takashi Miike would also make his mark in the horror genre, helping
to influence the 2000's trend of brutality and gore
with the Japanese film Audition, released in 1999.
Based on the book of the same name, Audition takes two extremes
and jams them together to create a stark contrast between the two.
A blossoming love story abruptly ended with these horrifying bodily dismemberments.
Along with Ichi the Killer, an extremely gruesome action crime film.
Audition was one of the largest influences for Eli Roth to create Hostel in 2005
and helped usher in this new dawn of extreme gore
as independent horror saw an influx in the genre due to VHS, television
and towards the end of the nineties, the creation of DVDs.
No movie really encapsulates the time of home media,
like the 1999 classic found footage horror film
Alright and my next guest stars movie everyone seems to be talking about these days.
It's the Blair Witch Project.
Critics call it one of the scariest films of all time.
Take a quick look.
I'm so sorry
for everything that has happened.
The Blair Witch Project released in 1999 helped
popularize the found footage subgenre dating back to Cannibal Holocaust.
Another video Nasty with graphic scenes of animal cruelty.
Found footage films try to blur this line between reality and fiction, giving us
these stories of seemingly real scenarios with the camera acting as a window
for the audience.
And while some films like to visually show their scares and villains,
the Blair Witch Project practices in the art of what you don't see
is scarier than what you do
[children playing and laughing]
Go fucking go!
Found footage films helped filmmakers break into the industry by utilizing
the advent of digital cameras to decrease cost while keeping the cast small,
to spend as little money as possible to create something
terrifying to movie watchers.
Marketed as a real documentary to the point of having missing posters
for the actors pop up as part of the marketing campaign,
the Blair Witch Project garnered enough attention and media coverage
to become one of the highest
grossing films to ever exist. Much like the marketing campaign
for Cloverfield, creators of the movie even launched a website dedicated
to the mythos of the Blair Witch in order to help sell the film.
Although movies like Cannibal Holocaust predated The Blair
Witch Project in terms of found footage movies, the Blair Witch
Project was the one that popularized the subgenre. Released in 1999
the movie would spark the idea of other found footage films
going into the 2000s with movies like Paranormal Activity
that became commercialized into a franchise.
Released on the cusp
of digital cameras instead of film, which was a huge pay wall for filmmakers
considering how much extra capital you needed to raise just to purchase
celluloid and processing.
Along with having an office space to manually splice the film together
on a flatbed unless you are working with a company with, you know, enough
resources to use digital non-linear editing software
like Avid Media Composer. Which was the first nonlinear
editing program or NLE program ever created.
Technology started to catch up with the industry,
allowing more filmmakers to join instead of it being strictly for the elite
As NLE programs became more easily accessible and digital cameras
started to become an accepted medium for creating feature length films.
Are you Piccolo?
Did you kill my grandfather?
It's a thong!
You are tearing me apart, Lisa!
By the 21st century, horror films
had begun to evolve in search for new ways to elevate the scares in the genre.
Gore was more pronounced and brutal, films became gritty
and remakes of popular franchises began to flood the commercial market.
The independent scene would continue
to grow throughout the 2000's, as digital media became more widely
accepted in the industry and NLE programs allowed filmmakers
to bring their films to life without having to rely on big studios.
The 2000s of horror films get a bad rap because of just how much bad
commercial horror motion pictures were coming out at the time
and hating remakes and prequels was the cool thing.
However, I find the decade
to be extremely fascinating because of the advent of digital cameras
becoming more popular, like the Canon XL1 and DSLR
cameras, the stabilization of the Internet and the growth of independent horror.
It was a big deal at the time when movies were released,
when they were edited on NLE programs outside of Avid Media Composer
and it wasn't until more recently that Adobe Premiere
has become a more accepted NLE program in the industry.
However, a majority of films are still created on Avid Media Composer.
Hey everybody, this is Eddie Hamilton, the editor on Top Gun: Maverick and
this is my avid timeline tour, so my avid timeline
So my avid timeline
usually starts out with either storyboard or some type of previews.
And today we will be looking at a sample of my avid timeline from episode three.
We are looking at a sample of our timeline from the Avid.
This is one reel.
During the 2000s films began to be edited by newer pro
amateur software like Final Cut Pro, with films like The Social Network,
500 Days of Summer and No Country for Old Men.
It was a huge turning point for the independent film scene
because of this new technology being more and more accessible to the general public
For horror films, the 2000's were filled with movies that are now
seen as iconic and have become highly revered in the horror community.
American Psycho has pretty much surpassed its cult classic label.
The Strangers is very common to see in top 100 horror film lists.
House of a Thousand Corpses is commonly referred to as Rob Zombie's best film.
Let the Right One In is highly revered from both critics and audience members.
Jennifer's Body has had a huge revival and is now
an amazing representative of feminism in films.
Shaun of Dead has been dissected as a comedic masterpiece.
Ginger Snaps is a great monstrous menstruation film.
The 2000s oozed with great horror movies
Based on the
1998 Japanese Horror Film Ringu, which is based on the novel the same name
The Ring, released in 2002 with a rating of PG-13, traumatizing pre-teens
by having this be one of the first popular horror films that they would ever watch.
When the Ring came out, I was 11 years old, right around the PG 13 Borderline,
and so I watched the movie at a relatively young age,
and it scared the ever living crap out of me.
I still can't stand the sound and sight of TV's static because of this movie.
It was also a great gateway film into like Asian horror, like uh
Ju-on: The Grudge, Shutter, A Tale of Two Sisters, Audition and Ichi the Killer.
Normally, I don't enjoy it when Western media whitewashes their cast
like with The Grudge in 2004 or Oldboy in 2013.
However, I enjoyed both versions of the ring for different reasons
and regard the American remake as the superior film, mostly
because the main character, Naomi, is such a strong female lead
and really pushes the investigation forward.
Unlike her Japanese counterpart
who kind of lets her ex-husband take control of the situation.
Although the ring had little to no gore, the 2000's made up for it
by displaying some of the most graphic special effects
that would create a subgenre that plagued horror films for years.
I rang him and I pitched him the idea for the scene.
You know, with the jaw trap.
I'm like, It's going to be great.
We've got this fucking this woman, and she's got this.
She wakes up strapped to this chair
and she's got the steel trap on her face in it. There's a timer on it.
When it goes off, it's going to split her face up and you know it.
She has to find the key, and it's hidden in someone's stomach.
And, you know, but she manages to get it off just in time.
And James is like, that's great.
Put a creepy doll in there and it's perfect.
In 2004, James Wan released saw as his directorial debut
that sparked a franchise encompassing soon to be ten films making
it the longest running horror franchise created in the 21st century
and along with Hostel, would create the subgenre entitled Torture Porn.
The Saw franchise is one that has been mistreated
since its creation, with the amount of bad press that it got
with the term torture porn, which is really just a smear campaign
against the violence portrayed in the films saw one through
three as a trilogy is incredibly enjoyable with some awesome special effects
which stay practical for a majority of the franchise
and that alone is insane.
We got a designer friend of mine down in Melbourne to help me make that jaw trap and
Stuart, man, he was a crazy guy.
He made that thing and he goes up to Leigh.
Hey man, you know,
if I put a real bear trap spring in this, it could actually work.
To which I replied, Cool.
Some of the best parts about Saw is watching the behind the scenes
on their DVDs
about the making of these different traps and sequences for the movies.
The Ending of Saw Five's Coffin Trap is actually almost
a fully functional death trap
that the creators had to be incredibly careful
not to hurt anybody with.
The metallic room
it was one of the biggest and most dangerous traps
because that trap, again was real like the rest of them.
Those walls, the way we rigged them, you couldn't push them.
They would crush you.
They have that much force, that much pressure.
The first saw is a solid horror mystery and really reflects the feeling
of a post-9-11 world with this focus on realism with a wicked twist at the end,
when John Kramer rises up from the ground with the Zep overture in the background
it really blew my mind when I first saw it and made me fall in love with the franchise.
Whether you love the movies or not, you can't talk about the 2000s
of horror films without mentioning them.
Considering a new Saw film was released every year for seven years,
that's almost as consistent as Friday the 13th was in the eighties.
Although not French, the films lean into the 2000 style
of the new French extreme movement with their very depressing
and graphic realism based violence like high tension and martyrs.
That type of horror film, the visceral, gory stuff like Saw, Hostel
hadn't really been recognized by a mainstream audience
and it had always been there, but it was always bubbling in the underground.
It was more like heavy metal music or something.
It was something that
a passionate core of people loved but the mainstream public weren't into.
And I feel like it is something at some point with everything,
if it bubbles underground long enough,
eventually it rises to the surface for a while and has a peak.
And that was around 2004 was the moment for that type of visceral horror film.
After seeing success with Juno in 2007, writer
Diablo Cody would get the green light to write her next project, a horror film
about a woman who eats boys called Jennifer's Body.
-Needy they're just boys, morsels.
We have all the power.
Don't you know that?
These things, these are like smart bombs.
Okay, you point them in the right direction and shit gets real.
A high school cheerleader named Jennifer turns into a succubus after being mutilated
and killed by a small town band
so they could reach fame through a sacrificial ritual.
When she returns from the dead, teenage boys begin to disappear
as she lures them in to feast on their flesh and blood.
Jennifer's body is interesting because it's layered with themes of
bisexuality and queerness, feminism, sexual empowerment, exploring these complex
female relationships wrapped up in this 2000 time capsule.
Why don't you just come by my place tonight?
I just got Auquamarine on DVD.
It's about this girl who's, like, half sushi.
I guess she has sex to a blowhole or something.
Posters of Fall Out Boy, Motion City Soundtrack, tracks
by All Time Low and Panic at the Disco. Emo Dressers.
There's so much that people who grew up during the 2000s can relate
to with the entire vibe of this movie.
The writing from Diablo Cody bleeds with memorable quotes
that I can't get out of my head, like
Are you PMS'ing or something?
PMS isn't real Needy.
It was invented by the boy run media to make us seem crazy.
Released at the peak of Megan Fox's career
the film was poorly marketed to the wrong demographic
from studio heads, trying to capitalize the actress's body towards
young boys and fans of Diablo Cody's previous work with Juno.
Even when trying to push the marketing towards a different demographic, studio
heads only cared about the representation of Megan Fox
to sell the movie and didn't care for the actual substance of the film.
I got a very memorable email from
from a marketing person at the studio once, right?
I had sent him
this articulate defense of the film and here is how it should be marketed.
And I said, What specifically are you thinking?
And he wrote back
Megan Fox Hot three words.
For cutting a trailer together?
That was for marketing in terms of in terms of what is the value of this film
on release, the film was met with backlash from both critics and audience members
as an occasionally clever dialogue, but the horror comic premise fails
to be either funny or scary enough to satisfy
Jennifer's Body was bashed so heavily that the writer Diablo Cody,
separated herself from the film industry and had to go into therapy
over the backlash of the movie. Just to appease studio heads.
At the time, one of the first scenes that they shot was of Megan Fox
walking down the hallway in slow motion.
Since its release, the film has finally found its market
with a modern day audience and has become a cultural icon for bisexuality
due to the MeToo movement, which the film plays as a direct parallel
with a group of men sacrificing a woman to their own personal gain.
It's pretty ridiculous
how much commercial studios are so out of touch with reality,
especially during the 2000s, that they would market a film
with context, exploring these very real representations
of complex female relationships and bisexuality.
To a large demographic of 18 to 24 year old frat boys
just because Megan Fox is in the movie.
There was a test that a kid wrote.
They said, What would you improve about this film?
And the kid wrote needs more boobs and spelled
boobs, b-e-w-b-s.
And that was the data that was collected and taken
seriously by the people who are marketing the movie.
Jennifer's body still sits at 5.4 IMDB and has a rotten score from both critics
and audience members below 50% and is probably one of the most
mismarketed and misunderstood movies ever created.
It's such a good dark comedy that's written and directed extremely well
with relationships that feel real. Needy and Chip have a
very caring and loving relationship, and seeing them have sex for the first
time is one of the most relatable aspects of the movie.
I love this movie so much and think that if you watched Juno
and just couldn't connect with it,
try picking up Jennifer's Body and seeing if it's something more up your alley.
The early 2000's also saw the release of Danny Boyle's rage virus film 28 Days
Later, another movie in the horror genre that helped re-imagine zombies,
although not technically a zombie film due to how those infected didn't eat flesh.
The movie had a huge impact on the zombie subgenre
to the point that it's now almost synonymous with the word zombies
and explaining that difference is more or less pedantic.
By the 2000s, the idea of traditional zombies had become tired on the big screen
instead of the slow walking dread that Romero had started, trend of
zombies started to lean more into the comedic side of the genre.
Come in dispatch.
Send more paramedics
The only kind of media that still used zombies
as a more horrific idea were the Resident Evil
and House of the Dead video game franchises, which ended up
being a huge influence on Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later.
A highly contagious disease called the rage virus breaks out
in Great Britain after a chimpanzee is freed from a laboratory.
The virus spreads, becoming an epidemic, resulting in the collapse of society.
And 28 days later, a man named Jim wakes up from a coma
and finds London deserted and overrun by fast moving infected humans.
Not only is 28 days later great with its shots of an abandoned
London, it also peaked
a lot of my interest because of the way it was filmed using MiniDV
instead of 35 millimeter print, making it one of the earliest adopters
of digital video along with Star Wars: The Phantom Menace
and the Blair Witch Project.
A lot of remakes of the time, like The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,
The Hills Have Eyes, and Friday 13th were seen as bad on their release
because of how tired audiences were with the movie remake Trend of the 2000s.
However, they've seen a bit of a recent resurgence of popularity.
Movies like The Hills Have Eyes Remake are seen as a great movie
for a younger generation with how far we are from the release of the original.
Out of all of them, Zack Snyder's 2004 zombie remake of the beloved George Romero
classic Dawn of the Dead, sits at the top as one of the best horror movie remakes
and helped to merge zombies with the rage infected humans
of 28 Days Later.
Fast moving zombies ready to eat your flesh,
even with something as small as a bite set in the same set piece as its original,
a suburban mall with the undead surrounding it.
The movie's success helped kickstart the career of both Zack Snyder
and James Gunn.
Although James had already received previous popularity
from the Scooby-Doo movies.
I'm Mary Jane.
like that is my favorite name.
Really? Yeah.
Although horror fans were upset and thought that he didn't have
the credentials needed to write it, Dawn of the Dead was loved by both
audiences and critics as it updated the zombie subgenre for the modern age.
During the same year, Edgar Wright would throw his own hat in the ring
with his second directed film-
Shaun of the Dead became an instant
hit and started Wright's three Flavors Cornetto trilogy
with Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and the World's End.
The movie's blend of humor eased audience members
into the subgenre and became an instant, highly revered classic.
However, on set, a lot of the film's cast and crew weren't
as confident with the movie, thinking it might not even see the light of day.
When we were shooting the scene with the zombies outside the pub.
One of the zombies in make up came up to me thinking I was a runner
and just looked over me and went straight to video for this one.
Luckily, Wright created not only one of the greatest zombie
films ever made, but it's filled to the brim with references
to both pop culture and older horror films.
The radio played during Sean's Walk to the Store references
a space probe that's the same as in Night of the Living Dead
the fish shop is called Fulci's Restaurant, a reference to the Italian
director, Lucio Fulci, who created multiple zombie films like Zombie 2
and City of the Living Dead.
Foree is the last name of the actor Ken Foree, who played Peter
in Dawn of the Dead.
Landis is a reference to director John Landis,
who created an American Werewolf in London,
and David's death is a direct reference to Rhodes Death in Day of the Dead.
We're coming to get you, Barbara.
Edgar Wright tried contacting all of the bands
and artists to get their input on the hilarious scene of when Sean and Ed
start throwing vinyl records at the two zombies in their backyard.
Shade was one of the only artists to give a response and they were ecstatic
about the scene, saying that they could destroy the album without hesitation.
When Edgar Wright would go on to direct Scott Pilgrim vs. the World six years later
he would create a cover of Sade's song “By Your Side”
as a nod to her good sportsmanship for letting them destroy
one of their albums in Shaun of the Dead.
The zombie subgenre became vast with directors
throwing their hats into the ring, exploding through the 2000s with [REC].
28 Days Later, Shaun of the Dead, Dawn of the Dead,
Resident Evil, Planet Terror and Zombieland leading to 2010
where the genre hit mainstream audiences on the small screen
Much like the 1970s and 1980s, the 2010s contain
an outlandish amount of amazing horror films and media.
So much that I could talk about it for another hour or two.
The 2010s were a huge revival of the genre, with impactful films
like Jordan Peele's Get Out, along with Ari Aster's Hereditary and Midsommar.
The genre
hit the mainstream at the start of 2010, when AMC released The Walking Dead,
continuing to capitalize on the zombie subgenre that became popular
thanks to the zombie craze that quickly gained steam throughout the 2000s.
The horror genre would also evolve throughout the decade as streaming
services created
horror movies and TV shows that helped hook the public audience into the genre.
Much like Mike Flanagan's Haunting of Hill House.
Episodic Horror became a large trend in the 2010s for both television
and streaming services.
Pulling the inspiration of their format from the anthology shows of the past,
like Tales From the Crypt
or The Twilight Zone, by releasing new episodes every week.
Online streaming services let horror fans binge hours of content
instead of waiting on a weekly basis and exploded when shows
like Stranger Things became cultural icons.
Mike Flanagan would become another big name in horror
after releasing Oculus and Hush, before creating The Haunting of Hill House in 2018.
Adding more seasonal anthologies into the genre
Independent horror would also become more readily available
with services like Shudder being able to bring marginalized creators
to those who already enjoyed the genre. Movies that would have otherwise
been left into obscurity from a limited theatrical release
gained popularity through their streaming services run
Like The Autopsy of Jane Doe when it was released on Netflix.
Independent films are a staple in the horror
genre, which is what keeps it interesting and revolutionary
since they're not majorly controlled by big commercial studios.
No recent film embodies that feeling more than David Mitchell's It Follows.
So some of this right down to the the wardrobe is I mean,
she's in high heels, which had some people
sort of point out questioning does that make a lot of sense?
And the answer is no.
It's probably it's it's definitely a bit of a play on
the conventions of horror all the way back to referencing
Women in Peril from even DePalma movies, for instance.
I watched this the year it came out on Blu ray because there weren't
any theaters near me that were showing it, and the movie blew me away in 2014
or 15, really causing a revitalization in my love for horror films.
During the 2000s, a lot of horror movies were utilizing new technology
with digital video and DV with cameras like the Canon XL1.
As movies began to move away from celluloid. Handheld and quick,
dirty, gritty shots filled with realism became the norm for the genre.
So when It Follows came out, I was so taken aback by it.
It wasn't reliant on this handheld camera work
and instead went back to movies like Halloween with these locked off
shots, Dollies and Pans with the soundtrack by disaster piece.
The score for the film brought the tension up another notch.
One of the coolest things about It Follows is this forced sense of surrealism
by mixing props from different points of time and putting them together
so the movie doesn't age with repeat viewings.
The use of CRTs, however the sister still has a form
of an e-reader. Mixture of both modern and older vehicles, corded phones.
You'd think that this movie might take place in the nineties
with how retro some of the technology is with these stacks of radios and CRT.
But the opening scene literally has a 2012 Nissan Versa.
These abandoned, empty suburban homes of the Detroit suburbs
have cars from the 2000s sitting in their driveways.
It all culminates to this very interesting, surreal fantasy world
that doesn't exist but is grounded in reality with a supernatural twist.
Along with The Babadook, It Follows marks an interesting turn in horror movies
where a lot more methodical and stylized with these auteur like scenes
reminiscent of the French New Wave movement from the 1960s,
as well as the influence of movies from the eighties classics.
The 2010s sought out a revival for horror films with more sophisticated
stories, characters and cinematography in its independent films.
And as the indie scene became more prominent, as streaming services
began to take over, commercialized horror films began to blossom.
With the beginning of Blumhouse Productions.
Blumhouse was initially started with a low budget model of business
where they would create these films
with seemingly no money and release them for a theatrical run.
Striking gold with Paranormal Activity in 2007.
By the year 2010, Blumhouse would bring in the original creators
of the 2004 film Saw with James Wan and Leigh Whannell to create Insidious.
It's not the house that's haunted.
It's your son.
On a budget of 1.5 million.
Insidious would go on to make back over $100 million and sparked
the trend of supernatural horror films from the 2010s.
James Wan is somewhat of an idol for me.
First Off He's an Asian American director,
which is something that I can relate to and is this huge genre fan.
It's like he's just this kid in a toyshop getting to play with these movies, IPs
and insane ideas.
Like a lot of the directors out there,
you know?
The scary movie genre is definitely the best genre to break out with.
You can really prove yourself.
All the directors that I admire starts out with a horror film
and I definitely have a true love for it.
and it's definitely the one genre that really allows you to do things
outside of the box that most other film genre wouldn't let you or can't
get away with.
His style is very eighties Italian
horror like Argento's Inferno, utilizing
constant zooms and Gothic set pieces.
And that style really comes through during the last few minutes of Insidious
when we reach the lipstick face demon's lair.
It just oozes Argento.
And you can see this influence of Opera on the set.
James Wan went on to create The Conjuring breathing an entire cinematic universe
for horror fans with New Line cinema and cementing his mark on modern day
horror films.
Blumhouse Productions continues to make low budget films such as Upgrade,
Whiplash, BlackkKlansman and 2018s Halloween requel.
However, its most influential horror film is Jordan Peele's Get Out from 2017.
It began as the fun of a horror story.
I wanted to I want to this my favorite genre.
I wanted to have fun while writing The Power of Story.
When you have a protagonist, the whole trick that all of us are trying
do is bring the audience into that protagonist's eyes.
A good story is one of the few ways we can really not tell somebody
You have to feel for somebody else, but make somebody feel
because they're they're experiencing it through entertainment.
Sink into the floor.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Get Out is the sixth horror film to ever be nominated for best Picture
out of the over 90 year span that the Academy Awards have been around.
With Jordan Peele making waves, being nominated for best director
in a low budget debut feature film. Premiering during a time
when tension in the United States were at an all time high,
you could say that the success of Get Out is almost mirrored
to the success of George Romero's Night of the Living Dead.
The sunken place is such a strong visual representation
of oppression where you can see exactly what's happening.
And no matter how much you scream and shout, nothing is going to help you.
The main reason as to why I love Get Out so much is because it opens up
this conversation about black representation in horror films.
In general,
it's been pretty bad up until around, you know, like the nineties
when people under the stairs, Tales from the Hood and Candyman came out.
But even Candyman kind of goes back to.
The whole black man lusting for white women trope.
Get out finds its mark
by creating this smart black male lead that people of color can relate to
who's trying to survive in this space occupied by these extremely rich
and powerful white people who want to kill you because of the color of your skin.
And while Get Out and Jordan Peele were nominated for multiple awards
in 2018, the Academy would go on to snub his next film, US with zero nominations,
even for celebrating the amazing performance of Lupita Nyong'o.
Horror films are extremely low on the totem pole for Academy Awards,
and with performances like Toni
Collette in Hereditary, it's becoming difficult to ignore.
The Academy's hesitation with the genre just said, I'm sorry or faced up to
-if you had just said, “I'm Sorry.”
Or faced up to what happened.
Maybe then we could do something with this
but you can't take responsibility for anything!
So now I can't accept
and I can't forgive.
Ari Aster's debut film, Hereditary broke new ground for the independent
entertainment company A24 by becoming its highest grossing picture
before 2022 when they released Everything Everywhere All At Once.
Being the fourth film that the company produced, Hereditary
became critically acclaimed and quickly solidified itself
as one of the greatest horror films of all time.
I watched this in theaters when it came out and the movie,
it fucked me up.
It's probably the scariest movie
I watched in the 2010s, and I think a majority of that comes from
its very brutal, striking and surreal images
like seeing Charlie's head after the accident.
Watching Allison
decapitate herself and her body floating to the tree house, Paimon's body,
The husband caught on fire, seeing all of that tied into these themes
of trauma and abuse, toxic relationships, mental illness and motherhood.
With these vivid scenes makes the movie feel as though it's a cut above the rest.
Hereditary is a masterpiece, and A24, its influence on the horror genre,
along with Blumhouse, has created this huge revival of horror
where we're getting these amazing movies left and right
that aren't just schlock and awe but also sophisticated.
80 slashers and exploitation storylines no longer enticed audiences
who wanted films that were new, slick and dealt with heavier themes.
However, there's a lot of endearment and flavor
when it comes to low budget independent that really stick with you
and the independent scene of horror
is more vast than it's ever been. With more ways to view them
that has ever been possible.
Commercial Studios have been pushing horror films into theaters because of how
well they're consistently doing compared to the superhero films of today.
Horror movies have been hitting
box office records more often than any other genre in the industry.
This can be seen as either a good or bad thing, as commercial horror
films are made to make these giant studios large chunks of money.
However, independent horror films are love letters from directors
who adore the genre and want to tell their tales without having studios influence
the contents of the movies that they're creating.
Terrifier created by Damian Leone, is probably the most well-known
version of what independent horror is like in the modern day.
Not only is Art the clown just a gem to see on camera,
the special effects are also incredibly well done as far as subtext.
There is none. As far as themes it's
hard to find. As far as the story goes.
It's very minimal. By all means.
Terrifier is very straight forward, and that's really what makes it so good.
There is no deeper meaning.
There is no context or subtext of trauma, like a lot of recent
horror films that try to shove it into their storylines.
It's a very cut and dry slasher film with updated graphics
and a great antagonist that's as fun to watch do their work
as much as iconic slashers of the eighties.
Although originally just a side character in All Hallows Eve from a short
called Terrifier, Damian Leone would crowdsource the creation
of the feature length film Terrifier and then crowdsource his next film, Terrifier 2
that released in theaters in 2023 by being distributed
by Bloody-Disgusting, who also helped produce VHS.
A found footage anthology Horror film, which now has five other films
under its franchise and umbrella.
I once made a movie
rather tongue in cheek called Psycho.
Yes.
And and of course, a lot of people looked at this thing and
said, what a dreadful thing to do, how awful and so forth.
But of course, it was to me, it had great elements of the cinema in it.
The content of such was I felt rather amusing
and it was it was it was a big joke, you know,
And I was horrified to find that some people took it seriously.
It was intended to cause people to scream and yell and so forth.
But no more than the screaming and yelling on a switchback railway.
We currently live in a world where horror films
are slowly becoming more recognized for the amount of sheer talent
that's been consistently represented throughout the history of the genre.
Films that would have once passed through the studio's eyes
are now readily available and created by these loving directors
that enjoy the genre, as much as any horror fan would
with films and TV shows popping up from all around the world.
Even foreign films are beginning to become accepted by Western media.
All of these movies and their culmination of history makes watching a horror film
become increasingly more interesting when you can spot the homages and references
that the movies are calling out, along with topics that you don't see
discussed very often in other movies outside of the genre.
Writing off horror films because of an elitist reason
that was formed off of critics is consistent bashing of the genre
cut you off from a
large amount of film history and movies that are so culturally influential
it's hard ignore.
With all the films that culminate to the collective of the horror
genre and the impact they've had on film history, it really makes you wonder
what new horror films are going to be influencing the future of
the genre.