Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Good evening. I'm William  Brangham. Geoff Bennett and Amna Nawaz are away.

  • On the "NewsHour" tonight: WikiLeaks  founder Julian Assange makes a  

  • last-ditch attempt to avoid extradition  to the United States on spying charges.

  • Then: Taiwan's top diplomat in  Washington discusses the island's  

  • relations with the U.S., as both confront China.

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI, Taiwanese Representative to  the United States: We trust that we will continue  

  • working closely with the U.S. administrationas well as Congress, so that Taiwan can get,  

  • under circumstances, the  best defense capabilities.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: And a look  at the presidential race,  

  • as President Biden breaks a fund-raising record,  

  • and Nikki Haley tries to gain ground on Donald  Trump ahead of the primary in her home state.

  • (BREAK)

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Welcome to the "NewsHour."

  • President Biden says the United States will impose  major new sanctions on Russia after the death of  

  • opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Officials gave  no details today, but the president said the  

  • formal announcement will come on Friday. Navalny  reportedly died in an Arctic prison last week.

  • His mother appeared in a video  today outside the prison still  

  • seeking answers and access to his body and  pressing Russia's president for action.

  • LYUDMILA NAVALNAYA, Mother of Alexei  Navalny (through translator): Behind me  

  • is the IK-3 Polar Wolf penal colony, where  my son Alexei Navalny died on 16 February.

  • I am turning to you, Vladimir Putin. The solution  to the issue depends only on you. Let me finally  

  • see my son. I require that Alexei's body be  immediately given so that I can bury him humanely.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The Kremlin today  denied any involvement in Navalny's  

  • death or that he was poisoned with a nerve  agent. In turn, his widow, Yulia Navalnaya,  

  • urged European nations to reject the results  of Putin's expected reelection next month.

  • For his part, Putin insisted today that  Russia will not deploy nuclear weapons in  

  • space. He spoke as he met with his defense  minister and urged all nations to honor an  

  • international ban on deploying nuclear arms  in orbit. U.S. officials say Russia has a  

  • new anti-satellite capability, but they  have not said if it's nuclear-capable.

  • Also in Russia, a Moscow court refused  to release Wall Street Journal reporter  

  • Evan Gershkovich from jail. That's  pending his trial on espionage charges,  

  • which he denies. Russian authorities  also detained a dual Russian-U.S.  

  • citizen on treason charges. She's accused  of fund-raising to support Ukraine's army.

  • The United States vetoed a U.N. Security Council  resolution today that called for an immediate  

  • humanitarian cease-fire in Gaza. The vote was  13-1 on the measure, which was backed by Arab  

  • states. U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield  said passing it would sabotage negotiations.

  • LINDA THOMAS-GREENFIELD, U.S. Ambassador to  the United Nations: Demanding an immediate,  

  • unconditional cease-fire without an agreement  requiring Hamas to release the hostages will not  

  • bring about a durable peace. Instead, it could  extend the fighting between Hamas and Israel.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: In Northern Gaza, the  U.N.'s World Food Program suspended food and  

  • aid deliveries, saying drivers faced violence  from people swarming the trucks. Hamas called  

  • the decision a death sentence, and it comes amid  reports of people reduced to eating animal feed.  

  • A U.N. study found that one in six children under  2 years of age in Gaza, are acutely malnourished.

  • Back in this country, two men were  charged with murder in the Super  

  • Bowl parade shootings in Kansas City. A  crowd of fans ran for their lives when  

  • an argument turned into gunfire  last week. One person was killed,  

  • and 22 were injured. Two juveniles were charged  earlier with gun violations and resisting arrest.

  • The U.S. Supreme Court has declinedcase on diversity in education. Parents  

  • and students argued that a special Northern  Virginia high school discriminated against  

  • Asian Americans in favor of other  minorities. A lower court upheld  

  • the admissions policy. The justices also  deciding against hearing a religion case  

  • on whether potential jurors may  be excluded over their beliefs.

  • A first-of-its-kind federal trial opened today  in South Carolina for a hate crime based on  

  • gender identity. The defendant is accused of  killing a Black transgender woman in 2019.  

  • Prosecutors say he'd been ridiculed  for having an affair with the victim.

  • In economic news, there could be a new team in  the credit card industry. Capital One Financial  

  • says it will buy Discover Financial Services  for $35 billion. If it wins federal approval,  

  • the merger would challenge the dominance of  Visa and Mastercard in the credit card industry.

  • And on Wall Street, tech stocks dropped,  

  • pulling the broader market lower. The Dow  Jones industrial average lost 64 points,  

  • to close at 38564. The Nasdaq fell 144 pointsor about 1 percent. And the S&P 500 was down 30.

  • Still to come on the "NewsHour": low demand for  commercial office space fuels economic fears;  

  • a domestic violence call in Minnesota that turned  deadly sheds light on a growing problem in the  

  • U.S.; a new exhibit chronicles the rich history  of independent Black cinema; plus much more.

  • A two-day hearing in a London courtroom  began today over the fate of Julian Assange,  

  • the founder of WikiLeaks. At stake  is whether he will be extradited  

  • to the United States on espionage charges.

  • His case has reopened debate over whether Assange  is a journalist and publisher or something more  

  • sinister, and many defending him say free speech  and an independent press is also at stake.

  • This will likely be Julian Assange's last chance  to avoid facing prosecutors in the United States.  

  • His two-day hearing got under way today at  London's Royal Courts of Justice. Assange's  

  • lawyers are battling to block extraditionwhich they insist is politically motivated.

  • American prosecutors want the WikiLeaks  founder to stand trial on 17 charges of  

  • espionage and one charge for  computer misuse for releasing  

  • huge troves of classified U.S. military  and diplomatic documents back in 2010.

  • JULIAN ASSANGE, Founder, WikiLeaks: It is  clear that it will shape an understanding  

  • of what the past six years of war has been  like, and that the course of the war needs  

  • to change. The manner in which it  needs to change is not yet clear.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: They say the Australian  citizen conspired with U.S. army intelligence  

  • analyst Chelsea Manning to steal military files  and diplomatic cables. The Justice Department  

  • is also separately investigating whether  Assange has ties to the Russian government,  

  • especially after WikiLeaks published  internal e-mails from the Democratic  

  • Party that were stolen by the  Russians during the 2016 election.

  • Today, Assange's wife, Stella, compared  his case to that of Russian opposition  

  • leader Alexei Navalny, who died  in a Russian prison last week.

  • STELLA ASSANGE, Wife of Julian Assange: It's  an attack on all journalists all over the  

  • world. It's an attack on the truth. And it's an  attack on the publics right to know. Julian is  

  • a political prisoner, and his life is at riskWhat happened to Navalny can happen to Julian.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Assange's legal troubles also  include his arrest by British authorities in  

  • 2010 after two women in Sweden accused him  of rape and sexual assault. Two years later,  

  • he jumped bail and sequestered himself  at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London,  

  • where he stayed around the clock for seven years.

  • JULIAN ASSANGE: As WikiLeaks stands under threat,  

  • so does the freedom of expression  and the health of all our societies.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The tiny Ecuadorian  Mission eventually evicted him in 2019.  

  • And British police immediately arrested  him for his bail violation years before.

  • He's been held in a maximum security prison  in London ever since. Assange's supporters  

  • rallied outside the court today, demanding his  release, and hailing him as a whistle-blower  

  • who exposed U.S. military wrongdoings  in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  • SADIA KOKNI, Julian Assange SupporterAssange, for us and for me, he is a hero.  

  • He's an advocate for truth, peace, justiceIt's really important that he's free,  

  • not just for journalism, but for  everyone that's actually walking this  

  • planet. His work affects us, because he's  exposing injustices throughout the world.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Should the British court  reject his appeal, Assange could be sent  

  • to the U.S. immediately to stand trial. If  convicted, he faces up to 175 years in prison.

  • For a closer look at Julian  Assange's appeal and the  

  • U.S. effort to prosecute him, we get two views.

  • Carrie DeCell is a senior staff attorney at the  Knight First Amendment Institute. Her litigation  

  • focuses on freedom of speech on social media and  digital age threats to freedom of the press. And  

  • Jamil Jaffer, he's a former senior counsel for  the House Intelligence Committee who also served  

  • in the Justice Department's National Security  Division during the George W. Bush administration.

  • Thank you both so much for being here.

  • Carrie, to you first.

  • As I mentioned in that setup there, Assange could  be facing 175 years if he were convicted on all  

  • of these charges. Do you think he should  face prosecution here in the United States?

  • CARRIE DECELL, Senior Staff Attorney, Knight  First Amendment Institute: No, I don't.

  • I think regardless of whether or not the U.K.  courts decide to extradite him to the United  

  • States, the U.S. Justice Department should drop  these charges. They are a direct threats to press  

  • freedom here because they could be brought against  any national security reporter worth their salt.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Jamil, what do  you have to say about that? What  

  • is -- is he a journalist? Is hepublisher, as his defenders allege?

  • JAMIL JAFFER, Former Senior CounselHouse Intelligence Committee: Well,  

  • a couple of things, William.

  • One, these charges haven't been brought against  any journalist ever in the United States,  

  • because Julian Assange isn't a real  journalist. He never has been. He's  

  • been a hacker his whole life. He doesn't engage  in the normal course of journalistic ethics. He  

  • doesn't redact sources. He doesn't  try to protect the innocent, right?

  • In fact, all of his disclosures have  resulted in more journalists and more  

  • human rights activists being under  threat abroad than ever before. It's  

  • his disclosures that have put those very  people, legitimate journalists, at risk.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: And, Carriewhat do you make of that,  

  • that there is a distinction here that hein one case, helped someone hack into a  

  • computer? That is not what a normal  national security reporter would do.

  • CARRIE DECELL: That may be right, but that's  one count of an 18-count superseding indictment.

  • The Justice Department could have left  the charges against him at that one count,  

  • but they filed an indictment adding 17  counts under the Espionage Act. And the  

  • charges under the Espionage Act are for things  that typical journalists engage in every day.

  • It's soliciting information from confidential  sources, obtaining that information,  

  • and then publishing it. So, regardless of whether  or not Assange himself qualifies as a journalist,  

  • it doesn't matter when it comes  to this particular prosecution,  

  • because these charges could be brought  against your average journalist.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Jamil, I wonder  if you would help -- your take  

  • on this distinction between beingjournalist and between being a hacker,  

  • as he says. Does he fall under the First  Amendment in any way, in your mind?

  • JAMIL JAFFER: Well, one, he's not a U.S.  citizen, so he doesn't actually have rights  

  • from the U.S. Constitution. Now, he's being  brought here, prosecuted here. Presumably,  

  • those rights will apply once he's here and in  our courts. But having published from abroad,  

  • he doesn't actually have First Amendment rights.

  • That being said, even if we apply the  First Amendment to him, he doesn't do  

  • the things that you would expectjournalist to do. He doesn't comply  

  • with journalistic ethics. He doesn't abide  by these things. In fact, the whole reason  

  • Ecuadorian Embassy kicked him out after seven  years is, he was behaving poorly while there.

  • On top of all that, even if you put  aside the hacking charges, right,  

  • journalists don't normally solicit classified  information in the sense of like, go get this  

  • specific information out of a classified databaseIf they receive it, sometimes, they will publish  

  • it. But even when they publish it, they take  efforts to redact information that is sensitive,  

  • protect sources of methods and the likegive the government a chance to respond.

  • Julian Assange didn't do any of that, because  he's not a real, legitimate journalist. And  

  • the idea that this prosecution would undermine any  journalist's rights, it just makes no sense to me.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Carrie, I'm sure you share  this concern that many of his supporters and his  

  • lawyers have, which is that he would have a very  difficult time getting a fair trial in the U.S.

  • Do you believe that's the case?

  • CARRIE DECELL: You know, I mean, I'm a  U.S. lawyer and I practice in U.S. courts,  

  • and I do still believe that the U.S.  courts can proceed through a fair trial.

  • But, that said, there are a lot of  circumstances around this particular  

  • prosecution that are terribly concerningAnd, as Mr. Jaffer mentioned previously,  

  • this really is the first prosecution  of a publisher of information under the  

  • Espionage Act, regardless of whether  or not he qualifies as a journalist.

  • And I think there are a lot of questions, open  questions, that the courts will have to address  

  • if he's successfully extradited here. And the  biggest, to my mind, is whether or not there  

  • are First Amendment limits on his and other  publishers' potential liability for publishing  

  • truthful information on matters of clear public  concern when it comes to the Espionage Act.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: And, Jamil, we should remind  our audience that, back in 2019, the Obama  

  • administration was presented with this option  of prosecuting Assange, and they chose not to.

  • Do you have an understanding  as to why they chose not to?

  • JAMIL JAFFER: You know, I'm not exactly sure  why they declined prosecution at the time,  

  • but, of course, since thenthe Trump administration has  

  • brought the charges. They brought  a second superseding indictment.

  • And those charges have continued to be  prosecuted by the Biden administration  

  • after a change in administration, a  Biden administration that, by the way,  

  • most of the people in the Justice Department  and the National Security Council served in,  

  • in the prior Obama administrationincluding Merrick Garland,  

  • who was nominated to be -- nominated to the  Supreme Court by President Obama, right,  

  • Lisa Monaco, the deputy attorney generalthe head of the National Security Division.

  • Matt Olsen was the head of the National  Counterterrorism Center. So the same  

  • people who are prosecuting Julian  Assange today served in similar or  

  • related positions back in the  Obama administration as well.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: so, Carrie, what  would you argue there, that, if  

  • the administration back then, the  Obama administration, you believe,  

  • made the right call, why do you think  that they have changed course now?

  • CARRIE DECELL: Yes, well, I meanas reported at the time, apparently,  

  • the Obama administration was really concerned  about its own inability to draw a line between  

  • Assange and journalists when it comes to what they  intended to prosecute him for in this instance.

  • And the Trump administration clearly madedifferent decision, probably not least because  

  • the Trump administration was not at all concerned  about jeopardizing freedom of the press and,  

  • in fact, was excited, I think, about the  possibility of putting the press on notice.

  • It's, I think, a typical Justice Department  practice of maintaining prosecutions that  

  • a previous administration filed, really for  the appearance of impartiality. And I think,  

  • in this case, however, the charges should not have  been brought by the Trump administration. And the  

  • Obama administration was right not to bring those  very same charges when it had the opportunity to.

  • So I think this Justice Department  should drop those charges.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Jamil Jaffer, what do  you make of the separate allegations that  

  • are made that Assange has some unhealthy  connection to Russia, that he basically  

  • served as a far-too-willing conduit for those  stolen e-mails back in 2016 from the DNC?

  • JAMIL JAFFER: Well, William, we have seen that  play out in real time. We have seen it play out  

  • during -- during that particular incidentbut many times as well where it appears that  

  • Assange has this somewhat inappropriate  relationship with the Russian regime.

  • He seems to be parroting Russian talking points  oftentimes. It's hard to know exactly how those  

  • ties play out. They're not indicted. They're  not part of the charges. But it appears to  

  • be part of what's underlying all this. And  it's not surprising in the context of what  

  • we have seen the Russians do in terms of  election misinformation, disinformation,  

  • and their efforts to manipulate  Western and -- Western audiences.

  • So this wouldn't be surprising as a Russian  tactic. Whether it's accurate or not really  

  • doesn't matter to the prosecutionbecause, at the end of the day,  

  • what Julian Assange is accused of doingif he's found guilty in a court of law,  

  • is prosecutable and is punishable  at U.S. law and has been since 1917.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Carrie, lastly to  you, the -- what happens next? Let's  

  • just say he is extradited or the court  rules against him and says he could be.

  • Does he have another route for appeal?

  • CARRIE DECELL: Well, in the United Kingdom,  

  • my understanding is that he would next have  to go to the European Court of Human Rights,  

  • and that he might be even put on a plane  in the meantime to the United States.

  • But, certainly, within the United Stateshe would have the opportunity to argue that  

  • he should not be held criminally  liable for publishing information,  

  • again, truthful information matters of  clear public concern. And the Supreme  

  • Court has held that the First Amendment  strongly protects that kind of publication.

  • Now, it hasn't done so in this particular  context. But Assange and his lawyers,  

  • I would hope, would make a vigorous  First Amendment defense to these charges.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: All rightCarrie DeCell and Jamil Jaffer,  

  • thank you so much, both of you, for being here.

  • CARRIE DECELL: Thank you.

  • JAMIL JAFFER: Thanks.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: This week, tensions have  increased in the Taiwan Strait following  

  • incidents near an island involving the  Chinese and Taiwanese Coast Guards.

  • It's happening at a sensitive moment  in between Taiwan's recent election and  

  • the upcoming inauguration of its new president.

  • Nick Schifrin speaks to Taiwan's  new representative in Washington  

  • for his first broadcast interview.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: More than any single issue,  

  • Taiwan has long been at the center of tension  between the United States and Beijing. Last  

  • month, Taiwan elected Lai Ching-teknown as William Lai, as president.

  • It is an unprecedented third straight presidential  victory for the Democratic Progressive Party,  

  • or DPP. Beijing calls Lai a separatist  whose election could trigger war. But,  

  • publicly, Lai has insisted his  policy is to retain the status quo.

  • To discuss these issues and the  wider relations among Taiwan,  

  • China and the U.S., we welcome Alexander Tah-ray  Yui, Taiwan's top diplomat to the United States.

  • Thank you very much, Representative.

  • Let's begin with some recent  tension in the strait. Last week,  

  • two Chinese nationals died when their boat  capsized while it was being chased about  

  • one mile from the Taiwanese island of KinmenToday, Taiwan drove away a Chinese Coast Guard  

  • boat after yesterday the Chinese Coast Guard  actually boarded a Taiwanese tourist boat.

  • What is your concern that  these incidents could escalate?

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI, Taiwanese  Representative to the United States: Well,  

  • we have always strived for  status quo in the Taiwan Strait.

  • The incident that you just mentioned, it's  a concerning trend that is happening. They  

  • are the ones who are changing the status  quo by changing all these incidents. They  

  • talk about red lines. They sayoh, you shouldn't cross the red  

  • line because this is a fundamental issue  for the people of the Republic of China.

  • But they are the ones changing the  red lines. They draw the red lines  

  • constantly on a different line. And that isconcerning trend, including the one in Kinmen.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: There's also diplomatic pressure.

  • After the election, the Pacific island of Nauru  traded recognition of Taipei for Beijing...

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Yes. Sure.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: ... leaving you with  only 12 diplomatic allies. That's 10  

  • countries that have switched from Taipei to  Beijing during the term of President Tsai.

  • Why do you believe Taiwan is  losing so much recognition?

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Well, in Nauru's  case, it was mainland China's punishment  

  • to the Taiwanese people for choosing  the candidate they did not like.

  • But we will not go challenges or  go race with mainland China on a  

  • dollar diplomacy. People in Republic  of China promises these countries a  

  • lot of benefits, a windfall of economic  benefits, airports, railways, housing,  

  • et cetera. But in most of the cases, they  go unanswered after they switch sides.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Beijing has recently  unilaterally adjusted a commercial flight path.

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Exactly right. (CROSSTALK)

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: We're going  to show an app right here.

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Yes.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Closer to the  median line in the Taiwan Strait,  

  • essentially normalizing the flight of  Chinese civilian aircraft closer to Taiwan.

  • Why is that so concerning to Taipei?

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Well, first of all, their  measure was unilateral. And they should have  

  • consulted with Taiwan, the way they consulted with  Taiwan back in 2015 when M503 was established.  

  • It increased dangers of national security for usbecause their planes are flying closer to Taiwan.

  • But it also increases dangers for  civilian people, civilian air routes,  

  • because there is encroaching on our airspaceAnd they should have consulted with us first.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: I have a question  about whether Taiwan trusts the  

  • United States. We looked at a poll  that shows, over the last few years,  

  • Taiwanese trust in the United States has  dropped from 45 percent to 34 percent.

  • And, of course, we're all watching where  Congress has not been able to send aid,  

  • mostly to Ukraine, but also to Taiwan and Israel,  

  • that the administration has promised. The  leading Republican candidate in the election,  

  • of course, is promising or is vowing that  he will not stand by promises to NATO.

  • Do you trust that in the future the U.S. will  stand by whatever promises it makes to Taiwan?

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Well, the  recent definition, whenever people  

  • talk about Taiwan-U.S. relations, the  most often used term is rock-solid.

  • And I would say that the support that  we, the Republic of China Taiwan,  

  • we get from United States is bipartisanAnd it's very heartwarming that Congress  

  • has the last session passed over 60  resolutions or acts in favor of Taiwan.

  • The United States, who has -- is having elections  in November. And we are trustful that, whoever  

  • wins the election, the new administration, this  bipartisan support for Taiwan will continue to be.  

  • So, we trust that we will continue working closely  with the U.S. administration, as well as Congress,  

  • so that Taiwan can get under circumstances  the best defense capabilities as possible.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: If Ukraine loses to Russia  or forced to cede territory in some kind  

  • of negotiated settlement with Russia, would  that embolden Xi Jinping to attack Taiwan?

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Well, that's  why the defense of Ukraine against  

  • the Russian invasion is very importantand the support from all like-minded  

  • countries to make sure that Ukraine is  able to defend itself is very important,  

  • because facing aggression from authoritarian  regimes -- and you speak about appeasement.

  • You speak about the Crimea incident in  2014. Not much was done. So it emboldened  

  • the Russians to attack Ukraine  two years ago. But you see also,  

  • you see the Chinese foreign ministerWang Yi, was in Munich not long ago.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: The security forum this weekend.

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Yes, the  security -- and he mentioned about,  

  • if you want peace and stability in the Taiwan  Straits, then you should not cross our red lines,  

  • and then you should follow our one-China  principle and accept that Taiwan is part of us.

  • And excuse me, this sounds very much like Munich  in 1938, when Hitler said, you want peace and  

  • stability in my region, then cut -- Sudetenland is  mine. Isn't it the same thing that they're saying?

  • But, besides, I'm -- as I said...

  • (CROSSTALK)

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Do you think the U.S. is  acting in the correct way to prevent war?

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: Well, we're very heartened  and we are very appreciative that, every time the  

  • U.S. leaders, as well as other leaders from  the United States, from Japan, et cetera, they  

  • meet with the Chinese leadership, they --  they warn, they appeal to the Chinese side.

  • They're insistent that peace and stability  of the China -- of the Taiwan Strait is  

  • necessary, and they're against the  unilateral -- unilateral change of  

  • status called by means of military  aggression, nor economic coercion.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: But they also  assure Beijing that they will not  

  • support Taiwan independence and they will  restrain Taiwan from any further action.

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: People  in Taiwan are not talking about  

  • independence nowadays. You go to Taiwannobody is talking about independence.

  • Again, Taiwan is our official name is  Republic of China. We are already a  

  • sovereign and independent nation. Sothere is no talk about independence,  

  • because we already are. And, again, asmentioned in another occasion, if we talk  

  • about independence, it means that we are right now  subordinate to some other entity, which we're not.

  • In President Tsai's 2021 National Day speechshe mentioned there's four insistences. We will  

  • insist on rejecting any attempt to encroach  or annex Taiwan and the Republic of China and  

  • the insistence that the future of ROC Taiwan  will be determined by the people of Taiwan.  

  • And that's the line that we follow and that's  the road that President Lai is also following.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Representative  Alexander Yui, thank you very much.

  • ALEXANDER TAH-RAY YUI: It's a pleasure sir.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Former U.N. Ambassador  Nikki Haley today vowed to stay in the  

  • Republican primary even if she loses Saturday's  vote in her home state of South Carolina.

  • Haley's decision comes despite not winningsingle primary race thus far and as President  

  • Biden's campaign prepares for an expected  rematch with former President Trump.

  • To discuss that and other  news in the 2024 election,  

  • I'm joined by our political  correspondent, Lisa Desjardins.

  • Hi, Lisa.

  • LISA DESJARDINS: Hi.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: So, Haley doubled down on this  

  • idea that she is in no matter what. What  is her strategy here? What is her plan?

  • LISA DESJARDINS: She declared this  her state of the race and -- speech.

  • And I want to read some remarks that  I thought were striking and something  

  • we ought to watch carefully. She  said she will campaign every day  

  • until the last person votes. That's  June 4 in the Republican primary.  

  • She says she's in this that long. She was  passionate, defiant, spoke for 25 minutes.

  • Her argument in some ways is the same. She  is saying that much of this country does  

  • not want a Biden-Trump rematch. But there  were some new things in here, many barbs,  

  • and particularly sharp, at former President  Trump, who she said has been a disaster. And  

  • she called out other Republicans, saying  they have not been honest about him.

  • NIKKI HALEY (R), Presidential Candidate:  I feel no need to kiss the ring.

  • (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE)

  • NIKKI HALEY: I have no fear of  Trump's retribution. I'm not...

  • (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE)

  • NIKKI HALEY: I'm not looking for anything from  him. My own political future is of zero concern.

  • LISA DESJARDINS: The Trump  team, meanwhile, however,  

  • sent out a memo today saying, in their  view, the campaign will end Saturday.

  • Of course, Haley says the opposite. When will it  end, is the question everyone wants to know. I  

  • spoke to one of Haley's former competitorsAsa Hutchinson, who has now endorsed her.  

  • And he said that there is -- there are  some pragmatic concerns here for her.

  • FMR. GOV. ASA HUTCHINSON  (R-AR): You don't have to win,  

  • but you have to show that you're  mounting a significant challenge.

  • Then that takes you to Super Tuesday, and you have  to have a strong enough showing in South Carolina  

  • to showcase to the donors that you have gotshot at this and that you can turn this around.

  • LISA DESJARDINS: Haley right now  is running off of fuel from August,  

  • when she had those big debate moments and  she got -- brought in a lot of money. So  

  • she needs to keep doing that to really keep going.

  • Meanwhile, as those who have watched the  program know, I worked in South Carolina  

  • politics for a while and I spoke to  many of my sources down there. They  

  • do see perhaps a way that she can make uplittle bit of ground. Close the gap? No way.

  • But what everyone is saying to me, including  our team on the ground, producer Layla Quran,  

  • Ian Couzens, who are returning today, they say  there's just a real lack of enthusiasm. They  

  • were at a Trump event today, Williamthat only had 70 or 80 people to greet  

  • him. That is a low number. Low turnout is  good for Haley, by the way, on Saturday.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: I mean, but Asa Hutchinson  mentioned this, that money is critical.

  • Where do the candidates stand on that front now?

  • LISA DESJARDINS: This is where we bring  in President Biden. He actually had some  

  • record-setting numbers. News today, his campaign  says they raised $42 million in January.

  • That is a record for a Democrat at this  time of year. So let's look at everyone,  

  • starting with the Republicans together. Haley  and Trump, the last figures we had from both  

  • campaigns were at the end of last year, Haley with  $14 million hand, Trump with 433 million on hand.

  • The equivalent for Joe Biden, end of last year,  

  • was $46 million. So that is good news  for Democrats. We have not heard about  

  • Trump's latest figures, which makes you  question how well he's doing with that.

  • There is another factor for  former President Trump. Two PACs,  

  • major PACs supporting him reported that they  actually spent $55 million in legal fees for  

  • him. And that is before his trials really  start, his criminal trials, I should say.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Right.

  • I mean, campaign dollars certainly great news for  

  • Biden, but they only -- can't  really buy votes with dollars.

  • LISA DESJARDINS: Yes.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: What do we know about  how he's doing with those actual voters?

  • LISA DESJARDINS: Well, his approval  rating still is around the same,  

  • under 40 percent, not where the Biden campaign  wants it. And there still is this disconnect,  

  • where the economy, unemployment's doing  well, Wall Street in general is doing well,  

  • we're seeing growth in productivityinflation is getting a little bit better.

  • We noticed a poll today from Monmouth University  that talked about this issue with President Biden,  

  • asking, should he give -- get credit for the  economic upturn? Look at the largest number there  

  • on the bottom; 36 percent say no, no credit at  all for President Biden for the economic upturn.

  • And when you mash these things together, you  look at the who gives him credit, who doesn't,  

  • it's 50/50, which is remarkable when you seelot of the economic numbers. Another statistic  

  • that caught our attention from this same Monmouth  poll, has your family benefited from this upturn?

  • Look at this. You see about third of  this country say they have benefited,  

  • but look at that; 64, two-thirds of this country  say they still have not benefited. And, William,  

  • looking at this, maybe the question isn't  how much have you benefited, but who?

  • The folks who said that they  did not benefit much at all,  

  • the largest group there, the significant  difference there was folks earning under  

  • $50,000. Traditional Democratsthey just aren't seeing any gain.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Lisa  Desjardins, thank you, as always.

  • LISA DESJARDINS: You're welcome.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: What some folks consider  America's ticking financial time bomb,  

  • empty office buildings.

  • NANCY WALLACE, University of CaliforniaBerkeley: Commercial real estate is the  

  • big problem across the country, really.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Real estate economist Nancy Wallace.

  • NANCY WALLACE: And, obviously, San Franciscothe problems are really significant.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Especially in San Franciscowhich The New York Times just called  

  • the most empty downtown in AmericaHow empty are the office buildings?

  • JESSE BLOUT, Strada Investment  Group: About 33, 35 percent vacant.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Develop Jesse Blout.

  • Compared to what?

  • JESSE BLOUT: Natural vacancy  rate is 10 to 15 percent.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Which means that the owners:

  • NANCY WALLACE: They are literally  not paying their mortgages.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Bad enough, but  there are also another trillion  

  • dollars in mortgages that need to be  refinanced this year and next. And so:

  • NANCY WALLACE: If interest rates don't come down,  

  • those mortgages would be nearly impossible to  refinance. And so we're going to see another  

  • wave of water called maturity defaultsof people being unable to refinance.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: And that would wipe out the ownersleaving downtown San Francisco and similar cities  

  • more hollowed out, shades of the great financial  crash of 2008, and thus investor and depositor  

  • fears in San Francisco and in the past few weeks  all around the country triggered by losses at  

  • New York Community Bank, which announced it will  try to reduce its commercial real estate loans.

  • But, to some folks, like developer Blout,  

  • the current crisis in San Francisco at  least actually seems like an opportunity.

  • JESSE BLOUT: We have never seen prices like  this. We started our business after at the  

  • start of the Great Recession in 2009-2010.  And that was a historic buying opportunity.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: This moment even more  historic. So Blout's firm, Strada,  

  • which moved into this 18-story building  in 2022, bought it a month ago for a song.

  • JESSE BLOUT: Fully 70 percent discount off  of what it was valued just five years ago.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: OK, a pricey song, $67  million, still, just 30 cents on the dollar.

  • JESSE BLOUT: San Francisco is still one of the  best cities in the country. It's the center of  

  • artificial intelligence. So there is more office  jobs in San Francisco than there ever were.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: So the office is fairly empty here.

  • JESSE BLOUT: Yes.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: And yet I see all  that traffic on your bridge.

  • JESSE BLOUT: It's picked up quite a bit. We're not  unlike most companies in San Francisco these days,  

  • where we tend to let people work from  home from -- on Mondays and Fridays,  

  • and then everybody's here. If you were here  tomorrow, it would be -- you couldn't find a seat.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Some see a building half-emptyBlout half-full, and betting on a return to  

  • work from work. Having paid only 30 cents  on the dollar, he had money to fill it up.

  • What are you going to do to get them back?

  • JESSE BLOUT: We're going to spend some money,  

  • a million bucks just for the window  washing equipment. It's all about  

  • creating new experiences for the tenants  and giving people a reason to come to work.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Includingrooftop common area with a view.

  • JESSE BLOUT: We're going to upgrade  all of the pavings and all the  

  • railings and everything and put in some  beautiful plantings and places to sit.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: So, Blout thinks he's buying  at the bottom of the so-called real estate  

  • cycle. That is, too little office space  means soaring rents, prompting a building  

  • boom, financed with debt. Eventuallythere's a glut, your tenants skedaddle,  

  • especially this time, thanks to COVIDYour rents can't cover your costs.

  • NANCY WALLACE: Then you foreclose or you sell your  

  • property at a third of its market  value, and the cycle starts again.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: But what happens to those  holding the commercial real estate loans,  

  • many of them regional banks without much ofcapital cushion? What do they do to keep afloat?

  • JESSE BLOUT: A lot of them  now are working with their  

  • borrowers to not take back the keys  in the so-called pretend and extend.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Pretend and extend.

  • Pretend that it's worth more than it  is, until such time as it comes back.

  • JESSE BLOUT: And everyone's hoping that rates  come down and more people come back to work.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: And extend is, hey, you can  pay us off over a longer period of time,  

  • so you don't have to give us back the keys.

  • JESSE BLOUT: Correct.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Now, to be fairmany of San Francisco's office  

  • towers are financed by huge banks like  Wells Fargo, which can afford bigger  

  • losses. But they too do so-called loan  restructuring, AKA pretend and extend.

  • Ed Obuchowski and Wendy Ross founded and run the  community Bank of San Francisco. So, I asked,  

  • is pretend and extend an accurate description?

  • ED OBUCHOWSKI, Co-Founder, Bank of San FranciscoIt is accurate. And if there's a challenge,  

  • I think it's incumbent on both  parties to try to work it out.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: So it's just a question of  terminology. I mean, pretend and extend or?

  • ED OBUCHOWSKI: Or working collaboratively and  taking the long-term view to work out of the loan.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Now, their bank makes commercial  real estate loans. So is it in trouble,  

  • maybe even headed for collapse like nearby Silicon  Valley Bank and First Republic not so long ago?

  • ED OBUCHOWSKI: It's not  had a major impact with us.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: No, it lends modestly, they saycharges a bit more, pays depositors a bit less.

  • But you thank your lucky stars that you're not  

  • a bank that put money into  fancy downtown real estate?

  • ED OBUCHOWSKI: Sometimes, small is good.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Was that your thinking  going in, that small is good,  

  • in that you wouldn't get stuck with  properties that might plummet in value?

  • WENDY ROSS, Co-Founder, Bank of San  Francisco: Our core is community banking,  

  • if you will. And so it's always going to be  the type of lending where we have a loan,  

  • but also a personal guaranteeand with guarantor support,  

  • we can look at the other assets of the  person behind the property, if you will.

  • And that kind of just goes back to the core  

  • community banking people. It's  a people business, if you will.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Isn't a big problem elsewhere  in the country among regional banks that,  

  • if the value of what's on their books, the  collateral of the commercial real estate,  

  • has gone down a lot, that they're  not going to be able to lend locally?

  • ED OBUCHOWSKI: It just hasnegative knock-on effect over there,  

  • because if they're working  through challenges there,  

  • it's hard to shift even psychologically from  workout mode to new business development mode.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Or perhaps even survive.

  • So much depends, then, on whether  workers return to their offices,  

  • as Jesse Blout is pretty much demanding  three days a week, and, of course, whether  

  • interest rates come down. Fed Chair Jerome  Powell is holding off on rate cuts for now.

  • How worried is he willing to admit  he is about commercial loans,  

  • Scott Pelley asked him recently on "60 Minutes."

  • JEROME POWELL, Federal Reserve Chairman: We  looked at the larger banks balance sheets,  

  • and it appears to be a manageable problemThere's some smaller and regional banks  

  • that have concentrated exposures  in these areas that are challenged.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: But, of course, how can the head of  the Fed say there is a crisis or even could be?

  • OK, you would like a bottom line, righton Powell's prognosis, Blout's investment,  

  • San Francisco, commercial real  estate and its lenders? Well,  

  • time will tell has become such a clichewe can't sign off with it anymore. But  

  • let's face it. Time will tell, until  the next real estate cycle, that is.

  • Hope to see you then.

  • Paul Solman for the "PBS NewsHourback home from San Francisco.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: A shooting  outside of Minneapolis over the  

  • weekend is putting the spotlight  once again on domestic violence.

  • Police responded to a domestic abuse  call and discovered a man armed with  

  • multiple guns who barricaded himself, seven  children and other family members inside his  

  • home. He killed two police officers andparamedic, before turning a gun on himself.

  • The gunman was not legally allowed to own  guns because of a previous assault conviction,  

  • and he had reportedly been  accused of domestic abuse.

  • To better understand how what happened  fits into a broader national picture,  

  • we're joined by Rachel Louise SnyderShe's been covering domestic violence  

  • for 15 years and is the author of the  memoir "Women We Buried, Women We Burned."

  • Rachel Louise Snyder, so good  to have you on the program.

  • I want to just run through some pretty  jarring statistics we just recently  

  • pulled from the CDC. This says that over  half of the women murdered in the U.S. are  

  • murdered by a male intimate partnerOverall, a third of women in America  

  • and a quarter of men report suffering  severe violence from intimate partners.

  • I also understand that these numbers have been  rising in recent years. Do we know why that is?

  • RACHEL LOUISE SNYDER, Author, "Women We  Buried, Women We Burned": I think there's  

  • macro levels and micro levels.

  • I mean, on the macro level, they're -- women  are not staying in bad marriages anymore,  

  • and we are better at gathering statisticsright? That's a very simplistic view. But,  

  • also, guns are far more prevalent, and  they're used obviously for homicide,  

  • but they're used as threatsThey're used as coercion.

  • And I think that men also probably feel  like they're losing ground. I think, also,  

  • there's a way to read those statistics as  positive, in that we have more resources now  

  • to help more people. So there's a sense  in which, the better the resources are,  

  • the more people are going to be able to come  forward. And so that in itself is a good thing.

  • But it's baffling, because  you think, the more we know,  

  • the more we should be able to prevent  it, and it doesn't seem to be the case.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Do we know how much the  pandemic exacerbated domestic violence in America?

  • RACHEL LOUISE SNYDER: That's an  interesting question, because,  

  • in the very beginning of the pandemic, rates  of calls to hot lines went way, way down.

  • And that was a really disturbing sign. And  it sort of gets at what my previous answer  

  • was. That was a really disturbing signbecause what it meant is that victims  

  • were unable to access resources  and unable to make those calls.

  • Once things loosened up a little bit  after the first couple of months,  

  • rates of calls to hot lines shot up in record  numbers really all across the world. And I think,  

  • coming out of the pandemic, there's a lot  of exacerbating causes that are not in and  

  • of themselves enough to make somebody violentbut could trigger an already tense situation.

  • And those are things like economic  factors, addiction. And all that,  

  • all those kind of social ills have risen,  I think, parallel to domestic violence.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: If this nexus, as you are  describing it, between domestic violence  

  • and guns is so clear -- and, again, with  regards to the Minnesota case, we should  

  • say that case is still being investigatedWe don't really know the details of it.

  • But if that nexus is so clear, and it is  illegal to possess a gun if you have a  

  • restraining order against you, why is this so hard  to enforce? Why is that not protecting more women?

  • RACHEL LOUISE SNYDER: That's a question  that I bang my head against the wall asking.

  • I mean, the simple answer is, you can have  a law, but that doesn't mean it's going to  

  • be enforced. And it has to be enforced. And  when you look at places -- I mean, I should  

  • say there's a Supreme Court case addressing this  right now. We're waiting the -- on the decision.

  • But, right now, as you say, there is a federal  law banning domestic abusers or anybody charged  

  • with a violent criminal act from owning  guns, but those guns have to be collected  

  • by police officers or whatever. And then, in  the case of Minnesota, that man had an arsenal.

  • And if you ask -- you go around and ask  jurisdictions why they don't enforce that,  

  • you will get a huge array of reasonseverything from, well, that's that  

  • person's recreation. So you take the guns awayyou're taking away the recreation. Obviously,  

  • the Second Amendment has a place there. We  have a right to arm ourselves to the teeth.

  • And I have even had police chiefs say to me  like, hey, we would love to enforce that,  

  • but we don't have a place to hold all these  arsenals, thousands and thousands of guns.

  • When you look at a state like California  that has enforced that, you see those gun  

  • charges go way down, you see homicides  go down. I mean, it's just mind-boggling,  

  • because, statistically, almost any way  you look at it, if you take the guns,  

  • the rates of homicide and suicide  and all other gun crimes go down.

  • But we just simply don't enforce it.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: You touched on this, the  Supreme Court. This is the Rahimi case,  

  • I believe it is called. Can you remind  us what's at stake in that case?

  • RACHEL LOUISE SNYDER: Yes, that's  essentially whether or not,  

  • since it comes out of -- it comes out of Texas.

  • A not very good guy had access to  guns and then had his guns taken away  

  • from him when he got charges. And his  attorneys have -- he's in prison now,  

  • but his attorneys have filed suit saying  he has a right to the Second Amendment,  

  • regardless. And so they're looking --  that's what they're essentially deciding.

  • Do -- does someone who has a criminal charge have  a constitutional right to the Second Amendment?  

  • And those of us who are really familiar with the  stats just are living in a kind of terror that  

  • the Supreme Court is going to rule that they  somehow maintain that constitutional right,  

  • even though they have proven themselves  to be a danger to their community.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: All right, Rachel Louise Snyder,  

  • thank you so much for being hereReally appreciate your insights.

  • RACHEL LOUISE SNYDER: Thank you for having me.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Film buffs will frequently  cite "Citizen Kane" or "Gone With The Wind"  

  • as early classics, but a new exhibit  at the Detroit Institute of Arts seeks  

  • to showcase lesser-known Black filmmakers  and actors who have a rich history of their

  • own. Jeffrey Brown has the story for  our arts and culture series, Canvas.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: "Regeneration,"  a silent film released in 1923,  

  • was a romance set in the South Seas featuring  an all-Black cast. It's just one of more than  

  • 500 so-called race films produced for  Black audiences between 1915 and 1950.

  • RHEA COMBS, Co-Curator, Regeneration: There was  an African American sort of cultural production,  

  • folks working in front of and behind  the camera that were using the tools of  

  • modern technology to create these visual stories.

  • This is a parallel history  that has been overlooked,  

  • yet still has been critical to the ways  in which we understand film history.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: Co-curators Rhea  Combs and Doris Berger uncovered  

  • this parallel history of Black film  in an exhibit originally presented  

  • at the Academy Museum in Los Angelesnow at the Detroit Institute of Arts.

  • Covering the first 73 years of Black cinemathe exhibit takes its name from that 1923  

  • silent era film, which survives only in  a heavily damaged 11-minute fragment.

  • Elliot Wilhelm is the DIA's film curator.

  • ELLIOT WILHELM, Film Curator, Detroit Institute  of Arts: We can see a portion of what it was,  

  • but we can also see, in a physical way, the  neglect and the decay that happened to the  

  • film. And, in a way, it's a metaphor for what  the exhibition is about, the erasure of the past.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: On display, surviving evidence  of this overlooked history, documents, costumes,  

  • film clips, and vivid posters, like this  one for the 1939 film "Reform School."

  • DORIS BERGER, Co-Curator, RegenerationWhat is really stunning is the actress  

  • Louise Beavers is mostly known in  Hollywood films in supporting characters.

  • Hollywood offered Black actors and actresses most  often butlers and mammy roles. But, in this film,  

  • she's not playing a supporting character, but the  main character. She is the star of the film. She  

  • is the boss of the prison and would like to seeprison reform, a very topical story to this day.

  • LOUISE BEAVERS, Actress: It means to change  from bad to good, to make better morally.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: "Reform School," in fact, was  released the same year as two film classics,  

  • "Gone With The Wind" and "The Wizard of  Oz," but it was long believed to be lost.

  • Now it, along with three othershas been fully restored and is part  

  • of Regeneration's accompanying screening series.

  • RHEA COMBS: We can wax poetic about  films like "Gone With The Wind," but,  

  • at the same time, we had other works  taking place like "Reform School."

  • The films highlight that African American  experiences are not a singular story.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: The exhibition does reckon with  the pervasive racial stereotypes in early films,  

  • including the minstrel performances  of Bert Williams, who starred in the  

  • unreleased "Lime Kiln Field Day," the earliest  surviving feature film with an all-Black cast.

  • And the exhibit juxtaposes its film artifacts  with the work of contemporary artists, here, Kara  

  • Walker taking on Harriet Beecher Stowe's "Uncle  Tom's Cabin," which also became a 1903 film.

  • RHEA COMBS: She is providing us  another way to look at this work.  

  • she's interrogating it. she's challenging it.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: The early cinema  section of Regeneration ends in 1915,  

  • the year a technically innovativebut deeply racist film was released.

  • DANIELLE ELISKA, Filmmaker: Just seeing  in person this invitation to the White  

  • House for the premiere of "Birth of  a Nation" is really emotional for me.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: Danielle Eliska, a Detroit-based  filmmaker visiting the exhibition,  

  • found inspiration for her own work amid  the hard truths of history on display.

  • DANIELLE ELISKA: But if I could take anything  from this particular film is that it has such  

  • a wide impact on people and made them  do things, and I just think about my  

  • own films and how I can utilize my films to  -- in a positive way, to impact my people.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: Long ago, the power of  films also drew in Madeline Anderson.

  • MADELINE ANDERSON, Filmmaker: We went to the  movies practically every week. And I saw that  

  • there was something wrong with this pictureBlack people were always presented in pejorative  

  • ways. They were always lazy, not too smarthappy to do anything that their masters said.

  • And, at first, it made me angryAnd then it made me sad. And then,  

  • as I grew older, it made me  want to do something about it.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: And that meant  becoming a filmmaker yourself.

  • MADELINE ANDERSON: Exactly.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: At 96, Anderson is  believed to be the only surviving  

  • filmmaker featured in Regeneration  through her 1970 documentary "I  

  • Am Somebody" about Black nurses in  South Carolina trying to unionize.

  • WOMAN: We want to be recognized, not because  of our race, but because we are human beings.

  • MADELINE ANDERSON: And I myselfbeing a working mother, Black woman,  

  • identified so closely with  them. They were my sisters.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: Anderson has made a career  working in television and on films.

  • MADELINE ANDERSON: I wanted to be a filmmaker  to show the achievements of Black people,  

  • and I also wanted to work in the struggle  for equality for my people. And that's  

  • what I have done all of my life.  I have been an activist filmmaker.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: And she's still at it, about to go  into postproduction on a film about her own life.

  • RHEA COMBS: Despite so many structural challenges,  

  • people still felt compelled and they  still felt inspired to do this work.

  • JEFFREY BROWN: "I Am Somebody" is prominently  featured in the final chapter of the exhibit,  

  • alongside the likes of Melvin  Van Peebles and Gordon Parks.

  • Taken as a whole, the hope is,  

  • this showcase of Black film history up  to 1971 will celebrate it in new ways.

  • For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Jeffrey Brown.

  • WILLIAM BRANGHAM: And that's the "NewsHourfor tonight. I'm William Brangham.

  • On behalf of the entire "NewsHourteam, thank you so much for joining us.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Good evening. I'm William  Brangham. Geoff Bennett and Amna Nawaz are away.

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it