Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • AMNA NAWAZ: Good evening. I'm Amna Nawaz.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: And I'm Geoff Bennett.

  • On the "NewsHour" tonight: President  Biden prepares to speak to Congress  

  • and the American people in his  annual State of the Union address.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: A cyberattack on the  nation's biggest medical payment  

  • processing company cripples much of  the United States' health care system.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: And the U.K. government  proposes new legislation to punish those  

  • responsible for the rising tensions  triggered by the war in Gaza.

  • JONATHAN HALL K.C., Independent Reviewer  of Terrorism Legislation: I haven't seen  

  • such open hostility towards categories  of individuals as I have since the 7th  

  • of October, that willingness, almostbrazenness, to go out on the streets.

  • (BREAK)

  • AMNA NAWAZ: Welcome to the "NewsHour."

  • Tonight, President Biden will  address Congress and millions  

  • of Americans in his third State of the  Union and the last of his current term.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: It's a high-stakes moment  for the president as he continues his  

  • 2024 reelection campaign. And the  speech will give him the chance to  

  • reach voters and convince them to give  him a second term in the White House.

  • Joining us to explain what we  can expect are the "NewsHour"'s  

  • Lisa Desjardins and Laura Barron-Lopez.

  • So, Lisa -- or, ratherLaura, we will start with you.

  • What new proposals and announcements can  we expect from the president tonight?

  • LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ: Thanks, Geoff.

  • President Biden is expected to  announce that the U.S. military  

  • is going to establish an emergency port  on the coast of Gaza. And we don't know  

  • exactly the location of where that port  will be, but we do know that that port  

  • will enable the delivery of truckloads  via ship, truckloads of crucial aid.

  • That includes food, water, medicine,  

  • temporary shelters. And this announcement  comes after the third airdrop in recent  

  • days of aid. And it means that also no U.S.  military will be required to deploy to Gaza.

  • In addition to that, Geoff, there are also  a number of key domestic proposals that the  

  • president will be announcing, including raising  the corporate tax rate to 28 percent, offering  

  • first-time homebuyers a $5,000 tax credit, capping  out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs for all  

  • Americans, not just those on Medicare, and urging  Congress to pass the bipartisan border deal.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: And, Laura, how are people in  the White House and in the Biden campaign really  

  • viewing this speech as a chance for the president  to reconnect with the key parts of his coalition,  

  • the winning coalition that delivered  him the White House back in 2020?

  • LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ: People inside  the White House tell me, Geoff,  

  • that they really view this speech as  what they call the starting gun of 2024.

  • And it's a chance for the president to  lay out his vision to the biggest audience  

  • that he is likely to have this entire  year. This is a type of audience that  

  • he won't typically get if he's just giving  a campaign speech. And then a source close  

  • to the president told me that, when the  president prepares for speeches like this,  

  • he spends a lot of time by himself trying  to think about what he wants to say.

  • He takes input, but he is also -- he tends to shut  everything out. And we saw him really take a lot  

  • of time this weekend at Camp David in preparation  for this speech. And we have an excerpt of what  

  • he is preparing to say that the White House  provided to U.S. based on his prepared remarks.

  • He's expected to say: "My lifetime has taught  me to embrace freedom and democracy. Now,  

  • some other people my age see a different  story, an American story of resentment,  

  • revenge and retribution. That's not me."

  • That defense of democracy, Geoff, at home  and abroad is going to be one of the three  

  • main themes of the president's speechHe's going to remind people about January  

  • 6. He's going to remind people about  the COVID pandemic that he inherited.  

  • And he's also -- the other two pillars  are a defense of individual freedoms,  

  • like abortion, IVF access, and then  finally building upon his economic vision.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: All right, so, Lisa, over to you.

  • If this speech is the starting  gun of 2024, to use that phrase,  

  • how are Republicans planning to respond?

  • LISA DESJARDINS: That is something  we have rare bipartisan agreement on,  

  • that this is essentially the opening  of the 2024 presidential season.

  • Republicans' response will come from one of  their most junior members of the U.S. Senate,  

  • 42-year-old Katie Britt of Alabama. Nowspeaking to her office, they believe that  

  • one thing that Britt brings to the table  tonight is the fact she's a working mom.

  • They told me that her theme will  be the idea that Republicans,  

  • that their party is the party of families  and children. They will push that forward.  

  • And another thing that Katie Britt  plans to do, she says she sees her  

  • speech as the closing prosecution of the  case that Joe Biden failed as president.

  • It seems to me she's not going to talk so  much about Donald Trump, but instead her job,  

  • which is a classic job for the response, will  be to take on Joe Biden's policy, specifically  

  • kitchen table issues they want to talk aboutinflation, prices, those kinds of things.

  • But immigration certainly will come up  as well. This will be a big test for her,  

  • but her office says that she's a meticulous  prepper and that they're not fazed,  

  • even though they know it's an awkward format.

  • One other thing we're watching for from  Republicans tonight, though, Geoff, is,  

  • will there be outbursts in the chamber? House  Speaker Mike Johnson has asked his Republicans  

  • not to have outbursts. However, as we well knowhe does not govern their individual decisions.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: Well, the president is the primary  focus tonight, but we should also say that members  

  • of Congress each get one ticket to give out  to a guest who can join inside the chamber.

  • I know you have reached out to nearly  every House office. What do these  

  • guests tell us about the members  of Congress and their priorities?

  • LISA DESJARDINS: That's right. In this time where national politics just  seems so stratified, we now see kind of  

  • decentralized politics, and local politics  matter more than ever. These members have  

  • a lot at stake tonight in the messages  that they convey to their constituents.

  • So I saw some trends overall, a lot of  guests having to do with health care, on  

  • the Republican side, some having to do with crime  and veterans issues. But we found three guests  

  • that we thought were interesting, that we wanted  to highlight their stories who are here tonight.

  • One is an IVF doctor, another someone who has  received some rare disease treatment. But,  

  • first, as I -- as you listen to these members who  are here tonight from all of the United States,  

  • I want to bring the voice of a woman who  was there on the -- at the Selma march,  

  • Bloody Sunday. She was 9 years old.

  • That anniversary is tonight, Geoff, as you knowAnd she came here to talk about voting rights.

  • SHEYANN WEBB-CHRISTBURG, Civil Rights Activist: It  was when I was 9 years old, when I participated as  

  • the youngest little girl on that Bloody Sunday  march, the most traumatic experience of my life.

  • And one of the things that's very critical as we  embark upon a new election is that we continue to  

  • really push and fight, not only to vote, but to  get others engaged, to become registered voters.

  • DR. PIETRO BORTOLETTO, Reproductive Endocrinologist and Director of Reproductive Surgery, Boston IVF: So earlier this week, I was actually performing IVF.

  • I help retrieve eggs from women who are  trying to use the technology to be able  

  • to build their family. I also retrieve eggs from  women who are about to undergo cancer treatment.  

  • People use IVF for different reasons. And I'm  here tonight to be able to advocate for them.

  • JENNELLE STEPHENSON, Gene Therapy Patient: I'm  visiting here today because I was fortunate to  

  • be a recipient of gene therapy for sickle  cell anemia. And it's been post six years  

  • since my transplant. And I haven't  experienced any pain or any crises  

  • related to it. And so I really just  want to bring attention to the topic.

  • LISA DESJARDINS: Now, another point  of attention that you will see in the  

  • chamber tonight, Democratic women  have decided to wear white. They  

  • say that's a representation of women's  rights, especially reproductive rights.

  • Of course, that was the color of the suffragettes  as well. One other thing happening tonight, Geoff,  

  • I want to relay. TikTok has barraged  these members with phone calls today.  

  • Many of them shut down their phones  after this appeared on the TikTok app,  

  • making anyone who wants to use that app had  to call Congress or restart their phone.

  • And this is something that has gotten a lot of  attention. But, tonight, as a result, there was a  

  • backlash from Congress in committee, passed a bill  that would effectively ban TikTok. I just raised  

  • that because, as much as this speech -- President  Biden has so many goals that Laura's been talking  

  • about, many of these members are thinking  about something else that might not come up.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: Yes, in fact, we havereport on that later in the broadcast.

  • That is Lisa Desjardins and Laura Barron-Lopez.

  • Our thanks to you both. And we  will see you later this evening.

  • LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ: Thank you.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: Well, as Lisa and Laura reported, the  stakes are high, not just for President Biden,  

  • but for Republicans, too, in  this pivotal election year.

  • When John Thune of South Dakota first  won his Senate seat 20 years ago,  

  • he made history by defeating a party's Senate  leader for the first time in over 50 years.  

  • Today, he is a candidate to replace Mitch  McConnell as the Senate's top Republican.

  • I spoke with Senator Thune moments ago.

  • Senator Thune, welcome back to  the "NewsHour." How are you?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE (R-SD): ThanksAmna. Good. Nice to be with you.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: Thank you so much for joining us.

  • It's fair to say now your party  essentially has a presumptive  

  • nominee in former President Trump after  Super Tuesday. You have endorsed him,  

  • as have many others in leadership. I should  point out you were among those criticizing  

  • him after his second impeachment, when you  said what he did -- quote -- "to undermine  

  • faith in our election system and disrupt the  peaceful transfer of power is inexcusable."

  • So why support him today if what  he did then was inexcusable?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: Well, look, I said whatsaid then and I'm not going to relitigate it,  

  • but I think what we have in front  of us now is a very clear choice.

  • And the voters, Republican  voters around the country,  

  • have made clear that they want President --  former President Trump to be the Republican  

  • nominee. And I have said I would  support the Republican nominee,  

  • and I think now we have a clear choiceIt's either going to be Trump or Biden.

  • And my view is, we need to put an  end to the Biden-Schumer agenda,  

  • which consists of higher prices, broken bordersless energy independence, and a weakened America  

  • on the global stage. Those are things that  a lot of us believe that we can change,  

  • if we can unite behind our nominee and get  a majority in the United States Senate.

  • And those are the types of things we're going to  

  • be working on because we think the stakes  are really high for the American people.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: It seems there are a number  of voters who still have questions,  

  • though. The primaries revealed specifically among  Republican primary voters in Iowa, New Hampshire,  

  • and South Carolina anywhere between 61 and  76 percent of Nikki Haley supporters said  

  • that they'd be so dissatisfied with Mr. Trump  that they would not vote for him in November.

  • So how does he win them over?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: I think it's really  important for the former president,  

  • now that the -- a lot of those primaries are  out of the way -- there are still some coming,  

  • but he clearly is winning very decisively.

  • He's got to reach out and build a coalition  of support that is broad enough, wide enough,  

  • strong enough, and deep enough to win a national  

  • election. He's got tremendous supportas you know, loyalty among base voters,  

  • but general elections are decided  in the middle of the electorate.

  • And so I think it's really important that  you reach out to Nikki Haley supporters,  

  • to suburban voters, independent voters, people  who a lot of times are -- can swing back and  

  • forth in elections. He's going to have to have  them in order to win the election in November.

  • And a lot of us believe that he's got to  perform that way at the top of the ballot,  

  • and it will help our downballot races  in the Senate and the House. And we're  

  • trying to get a majority of  the United States Senate.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: I want to ask you about the race  to replace Senator Mitch McConnell as leader  

  • when he steps down later this yearYou have thrown your hat in the ring.

  • On the issue of Ukraine aid  specifically, do you think,  

  • as leader, you would be able to convince  House Republicans to back aid to Ukraine  

  • in a way that Mitch McConnell has not yet so farespecially if Mr. Trump continues to oppose it?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: I think that the  challenge, of course, right now,  

  • with the situation deteriorating there, is to  try and feel a sense of urgency about this.

  • I'm hoping the House can execute on getting  something passed, ideally the Senate bill,  

  • but if not something that they could send  to the Senate that we could then act on. I'm  

  • hoping that there is enough of a consensus  and a majority of Republicans in the House  

  • who believe that we need to defend America's  interests, we need to stand with our allies,  

  • that this does represent a national  security threat for our country.

  • America cannot retreat from the world stageAmerican leadership is desperately needed now  

  • more than I think any time in recent historyand we need to make sure that Ukraine has  

  • the weaponry and the resources that it  needs to defeat the Russians, because,  

  • if we're not sending them American weaponsand they succeed in Ukraine, and they go  

  • into a -- roll into a NATO country, then we're  going to be sending American sons and daughters.

  • And I would much rather send weaponry, ammunitionthat sort of thing, and let the Ukrainian people,  

  • who have been really good about  carrying the fight to the Russians,  

  • win that battle. And I hope that we can get  the political support to make that happen.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: Senator, as you know, abortion  access remains a top issue for millions of  

  • voters. We do expect President  Biden to speak to that tonight.

  • And I guess, when you ask Democrats, what is  their stance on abortion, they say protect a  

  • woman's right to choose. What would you say  is the Republican stance on abortion access?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: Well, I think that the  Republican position is to let the people decide.

  • And what the court said is, this is not going to  be decided by people in Black robes in Washington,  

  • D.C. This needs to go back to the states and  their voters. And I think that's exactly what's  

  • happening. States around the country are  making decisions, putting policies in place  

  • that reflect the will and the sentiment  of the voters in those individual states.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: On a related issue, we saw  the Alabama ruling on IVF show just how  

  • far and wide-reaching the implications  of the overturning of Roe v. Wade can go.

  • Your Republican colleague blocked  a bill that would actually protect  

  • IVF access nationwide. So I just wanted to ask  on your stance. Do you support IVF treatment?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: Absolutely.

  • IVF has been an amazing, I guess you would saysolution for a lot of couples and families that  

  • haven't been able to have kids. Andthink it's been made clear. Of course,  

  • the Alabama court took a position, but  the Alabama legislature has since ruled  

  • or proposed legislation on that, which the  governor has since signed in support of IVF.

  • And I don't think that you will find very many  people in this country who don't realize what  

  • an effective method it is of enabling  people who otherwise couldn't be able  

  • to have a family. So we're pro-familywe're pro-life and IVF represents that.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: I need to ask you more  broadly about this moment in time  

  • where we are now eight months before the election.

  • You have two elderly, unpopular candidates  with very different visions for America. One,  

  • however, does face 91 criminal chargesHe tried to stop the peaceful transfer  

  • of power and already lost to Mr. Biden in  2020. So, in an election that hinges on  

  • a few states and very narrow marginsare you worried that voters concerned  

  • about all of those things will either stay  home or vote for a third-party candidate?

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: I think, in the  end -- and I know there's always  

  • a lot of conversations about  third-party candidates. And,  

  • clearly, in some cases, if people don't  like the options, they could stay home.

  • But I do really think that you will seebig turnout this year because I think people  

  • see it a very clear choice. And you pointed  out these are contrasting visions and these  

  • are very different views about how to lead  this country and the direction we ought to  

  • head in. I'm one who believes that we need to  pivot, we need to go in a different direction,  

  • and that we need new leadership both in the White  House and in Congress, or at least in the Senate.

  • And so my view is that, as people  think about this election, yes,  

  • I want them to vote. I want the electorate  to be energized and engaged. And I ultimately  

  • believe they will be, because I think, as  I said before, the stakes are really high.  

  • And I think people understand what's  at risk here if we don't get it right.

  • And I'm hopeful, again, that we will see  people turn out in big numbers and that  

  • they will vote for Republicans for Senate and  hopefully President Trump for the White House.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: That is Senate Republican Whip  John Thune of South Dakota joining us tonight.

  • Senator, thank you. Always great to see you.

  • SEN. JOHN THUNE: Thanks, Amna. Nice to see you.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: And we will have more  live coverage of the State of the  

  • Union online and later tonight beginning  at 9:00 p.m. Eastern right here on PBS.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: In the day's other headlines:  

  • President Biden moved closer to clinching the  Democratic presidential nomination overnight.  

  • He won the Hawaii caucuses with 66 percent of  the vote, but the choice of uncommitted received  

  • 29 percent. The president still needs a little  over 400 delegates to wrap up the nomination.

  • A move to bar access to TikTok headed to the House  floor today after a strong show of support in  

  • committee. The vote was 50-0 to make the Chinese  firm ByteDance sell off the video sharing app  

  • or see it banned. The bill also allows for  denying access to a foreign-owned app that  

  • is deemed a danger to national security. TikTok  denies that it poses any danger to U.S. users.

  • In the Middle East, cease-fire talks in  Cairo are now on hold with little chance  

  • of a deal before the Muslim holy month of  Ramadan starts. Hamas blamed Israel today  

  • for refusing to accept a permanent cease-fire and  withdrawal from Gaza. But Israeli Prime Minister  

  • Benjamin Netanyahu told a military graduation  ceremony today that the offensive will not stop.

  • BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, Israeli Prime Minister  (through translator): Today, I want to tell  

  • you in clear words the IDF will continue  to operate against all Hamas battalions  

  • all over the Gaza Strip. And this includes  Rafah, the last stronghold of Hamas. Whoever  

  • tells us not to operate in Rafah tells us  to lose the war, and that will not happen.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: Meantime, Jordan,  

  • the U.S. and other countries airdropped  more humanitarian supplies into Northern  

  • Gaza. But relief workers said it's still  only a fraction of what's actually needed.

  • Sweden officially became the 32nd  member of NATO today. The Swedes  

  • and Finland moved to join the alliance  after Russia invaded Ukraine. Today,  

  • the Swedish prime minister handed over  final documents to Secretary of State  

  • Antony Blinken in Washington. The papers were  officially deposited into a special vault.

  • Here at home, a jury in Michigan heard opening  statements in the involuntary manslaughter trial  

  • of James Crumbley. His teenage son killed  four high school classmates in 2021. Today,  

  • the father listened as prosecutors  noted he bought the handgun used  

  • in the shootings. The defense argued he  had no way of knowing his son's intent.

  • MARC KEAST, Assistant Prosecuting AttorneyOakland County, Michigan: James Crumbley  

  • bought that gun that his son used to kill asgift for his son four days before the attack.  

  • James Crumbley failed to secure that gun in  a way to prevent his son from accessing it.

  • MARIELL LEHMAN, Attorney For James CrumbleyThe prosecution alleges that James Crumbley  

  • had knowledge that his son could and would  hurt other people and that he failed to  

  • protect those people, that he failed  to take steps to protect others. And,  

  • ladies and gentlemen, that simply is not true.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: The shooter's  mother, Jennifer Crumbley,  

  • was found guilty of the same charges last month.

  • Xcel Energy acknowledged today that its equipment  apparently ignited a giant wildfire in the Texas  

  • Panhandle. But the utility also disputed  any claim of negligence. Authorities are  

  • still investigating the cause of the blaze  that's become the largest in state history.  

  • It burned nearly 1,700 square miles in hundreds  of buildings, but is now nearly half-contained.

  • And, on Wall Street, stocks rallied as Federal  Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the Central  

  • Bank is not far from cutting interest ratesThe Dow Jones industrial average gained 130  

  • points to close at 38791. The Nasdaq  rose 241 points. The S&P 500 added 52.

  • And 29-year-old sailor Cole Brauer  has become the first American woman  

  • to complete a solo race around the  world. She stood on her 40-foot-long  

  • sailboat gliding into a Spanish port  early today after setting sail from  

  • the same spot 130 days ago. Once on landthe champagne flowed as she celebrated.

  • Congratulations to her.

  • Still to come on the "NewsHour":  

  • the Biden administration's efforts to restore  America's global influence after Trump left  

  • office; and the challenges that tribal  communities face accessing the Internet.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: A cyberattack on a little-known health  care company last month has caused major trouble  

  • and serious financial consequences for hospitalsdoctors and patients around the country.

  • Stephanie Sy looks at the impact and  the efforts to solve these problems.

  • STEPHANIE SY: Amna, the American Hospital  Association has described the hack  

  • as -- quote -- "the most serious cyberattack  in history on the health care system."

  • It began about two weeks ago, when  hackers shut down a payment processing  

  • system run by a company called Change owned by  UnitedHealthcare. Change essentially functions  

  • as a middleman between insurers, providershospitals, and pharmacies. Hospitals and other  

  • medical practices have not been able to process  bills and get payments they need to operate.

  • Doctors and patients have been unable  to get insurance approvals for some  

  • procedures. And until a few days  ago, pharmacies were also impacted.

  • Here's what one doctor in Texas posted on TikTok.

  • WOMAN: This morning, I spent probably several  hours calling several pharmacies because my  

  • patients hadn't received their prescriptions  that I prescribed last week. So I -- it's not  

  • usual that I have to call the pharmaciesLike, usually, I only call the pharmacies  

  • if there are, like, shortages or controlled  substances or something else is going on.

  • STEPHANIE SY: She suspects the delays  were because of the health care hack.

  • This week, the Department of Health and  Human Services announced steps to help,  

  • including providing some advanced payments  for providers. But problems remain.

  • Dan Diamond has been covering this for  The Washington Post and joins me now.

  • Dan, welcome to the "NewsHour."

  • You heard me describe some of the  problems. Give us a sense of the  

  • scope and the magnitude of the disruptions  and who has borne the brunt of the impact.

  • DAN DIAMOND, The Washington Post: StephanieChange Healthcare was the middleman for tens  

  • of millions of insurance claims every  day. So that means virtually everyone  

  • in health care is being touched  by this directly because they're  

  • waiting to get paid or they work with  performers and players that are waiting.

  • Right now, there are real pains for physiciansPhysicians don't necessarily have the cash flow  

  • for now two weeks of not getting paid. So we  have talked -- here at The Washington Post,  

  • we have talked to doctors who have  had to take out emergency loans,  

  • that have gone on heroic measures  to just keep their practices open.

  • Hospitals also have been able to scramble  and try to figure out how to keep their  

  • operations paid for, pharmacists that  you mentioned earlier. I talked to a  

  • therapist who hasn't been paid. It really is  touching every corner of health care right now.

  • STEPHANIE SY: Is critical  patient care being impacted?

  • DAN DIAMOND: Right now, no.

  • There are efforts to make sure that patients are  being protected. There are procedures that are  

  • still taking place. It's a back end issuebut the back end issues are so severe that,  

  • inevitably, if this continues, there will be  problems facing the front end. There will be  

  • doctors who can't keep their lights on. There  will be staff who might have to be furloughed.

  • So, eventually, there will be a crisis point. And  that's what health officials are trying to stave  

  • off by talking about or starting to advance  emergency loans to keep these providers open.

  • STEPHANIE SY: So, we're now already at least  two weeks in to since the hack was reported.  

  • And there have been reports that UnitedHealthcare  may have paid a $22 million ransom to the cyber  

  • gang purportedly behind the attack. Why isn't the  system back up and running if that is the case?

  • DAN DIAMOND: First, I think ransomware groups,  

  • hackers, are not necessarily  the most reliable partners here.

  • And even though there may have been a payment  from UnitedHealth -- they have not confirmed  

  • that -- it's not necessarily going to resolve  the issue when you're dealing with one of these  

  • groups. There still are systems that need to  be checked. There's data that was encrypted  

  • and was taken and may not be back in the hands  of United, assuming they made this payment.

  • So it's very risky when dealing with  ransomware to begin with. And the scope  

  • of this hack was so extensive, it's  hard to just flip the switch back on,  

  • even if the hackers have returned what was taken.

  • STEPHANIE SY: What made Change Healthcare  vulnerable to this? And more broadly,  

  • Dan, what is it exposed about the  weaknesses in our health care system?

  • DAN DIAMOND: Change was vulnerable  in part because they're a big target.

  • Even before United bought them, and United is  a major health care company, one of the largest  

  • companies in the United States, Change was already  this major processor of claims. And they take data  

  • from hospitals, from doctors, and then check  that data, pass it on to the insurance company.

  • They're in the middle of all of these  transactions. They have sensitive medical  

  • data that is very alluring to hackers. So  I'm not exactly sure. I don't think we know  

  • the ways that hackers found their way into  Change, but health care companies are under  

  • attack in this way all the time. This just  happens to be a particularly large hack.

  • And it also has pointed to how much we rely  on just a handful of health care companies  

  • as consolidation increases across the industryChange is this major middleman. They're owned by  

  • UnitedHealth, which has its fingers all over  health care right now. And that is something  

  • that government officials that I have talked  to this week have been thinking about as well.

  • There's an antitrust probe into United through the  

  • Justice Department preceded thisBut there is a real question about,  

  • what are the risks if so much of health  care is concentrated in just a few hands?

  • STEPHANIE SY: We talked a little bit about  the Department of Health and Human Services'  

  • response. How do physicians and hospitals  feel about how the government has reacted?

  • DAN DIAMOND: They're not feeling great, Stephanie.

  • No one is happy with the response so  far. Hospitals have gotten more help.  

  • They have deeper pockets, that  they're able to weather the pain  

  • better than some other organizationsBut even hospitals say they need more  

  • than the loans that are being offered  potentially by the federal government.

  • Physicians are not eligible for those loans right  now from the federal government. UnitedHealth has  

  • made available emergency loans for doctorsbut what they have told us, they're getting  

  • offered pennies on the dollar. They might  be down hundreds of thousands of dollars,  

  • millions of dollars at this point in claims  that haven't been paid, and they're being  

  • offered thousands of dollars, maybe $10,000  to patch that hole, which they can't do.

  • So there is bipartisan outrage in Congress. I  was at the White House earlier today talking  

  • with officials, who say this is really  something that they're looking to the  

  • private sector right now to try and solve  before the federal government steps in more.

  • STEPHANIE SY: Dan Diamond  with The Washington Post.

  • Dan, thanks so much for your reporting.

  • DAN DIAMOND: Thank you, Stephanie.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: In Britain, the government  there is planning new legislation to punish  

  • extremists responsible for rising  tensions over the war in Gaza.

  • As special correspondent Malcolm Brabant tells  us, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is concerned  

  • that both Jewish and Muslim communities are being  targeted and that social cohesion is under threat.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Support for the  Palestinian cause in the city of  

  • Brighton is particularly vocal, and  protesters wore black to mourn for  

  • Gaza and show disdain for Rishi Sunak's  urgent speech to the nation last Friday.

  • RISHI SUNAK, British Prime Minister: In  recent weeks and months, we have seen a  

  • shocking increase in extremist disruption and  criminality. What started as protests on our  

  • streets has descended into intimidationthreats and planned acts of violence.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: The Brighton  demonstration was peaceful,  

  • but organizer Russell Craddock didn't  like the scrutiny of our camera.

  • RUSSELL CRADDOCK, Palestinian Solidarity  Campaign: Who are you filming for?

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: American television.

  • RUSSELL CRADDOCK: Oh. I'm not  giving you permission to film.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: I have permission to  film because this is an open space.

  • RUSSELL CRADDOCK: Does someone  want to stand in front of him?

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Freedom to film in public  places is a longstanding British tradition,  

  • but national values, including  tolerance, are under strain.

  • RISHI SUNAK: Jewish children fearful to wear their  school uniform, lest it reveal their identity,  

  • Muslim women abused in the street  for the actions of a terrorist group  

  • they have no connection with. Now  our democracy itself is a target.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Across the square, Jewish  residents stood guard around a memorial to  

  • victims of the Hamas terrorist attack  on Southern Israel on October the 7th.

  • ADAM MA'ANIT, Jewish Community Leader: The day  after the October 7 massacres, on October 8,  

  • they had a demonstration in the center of the  city, and they had a speaker who praised the  

  • October 7 massacre and said that it was a day  of celebration. That's who these people are.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Adam Ma'anit's  18-year-old cousin, Maayan,  

  • was murdered on October the 7. Her father  was kidnapped and remains a hostage.

  • ADAM MA'ANIT: You speak to any Jew in the countrymany of them will be experiencing heightened sense  

  • of insecurity and fear from weekly protestspeople shouting at them when they exit their  

  • synagogues, people harassing them on social  media. I mean, social media is a sewer right now.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: On the other side  of town, former dancer Lee Whitaker  

  • carried a bundle to represent children  killed by Israel's bombardment of Gaza.

  • LEE WHITAKER, Pro-Palestinian ProtesterYou can see what extremists we are. And  

  • that is just Rishi Sunak. He's  making trouble. It's actually  

  • our protests are protests of love. The  big thousands of us marching in London,  

  • I have never seen any trouble. There's  such a wonderful feeling of camaraderie.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: In London, the mayor, Sadiq Khan,  

  • is concerned that anti-Muslim  bigotry is also on the rise.

  • SADIQ KHAN, Mayor of London: What we're  witnessing is a concerted and growing  

  • attempt by some to degrade and humiliate  minorities for political and electoral gain.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: But an angry and  chaotic debate in Parliament about  

  • Gaza last month raised fears about intimidation.

  • House Speaker Lindsay Hoyle:

  • SIR LINDSAY HOYLE, Parliament  Speaker, United Kingdom: I am very,  

  • very concerned about the security of all members.

  • PROTESTER: From the river to the sea!

  • PROTESTER: Palestine will be free!

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: This chant is at the center  of government concerns. While some right-wing  

  • Israeli factions use "From the river to the  sea" to taunt Palestinians about expulsion,  

  • Jewish groups regard the pro-Palestinian  version as a threat to wipe Israel off the map.

  • It was projected onto Parliament's clock  tower as members were arguing about the war.

  • RISHI SUNAK: M.P.s do not feel safe in their  homes. There is no context in which it can  

  • be acceptable to beam antisemitic tropes onto  Big Ben in the middle of a vote on Israel-Gaza.

  • JONATHAN HALL K.C., Independent Reviewer  of Terrorism Legislation: No, I don't think  

  • it was just politicking. He was effectively  drawing attention to what he and I think also  

  • the official opposition regard as something  of real significance, and if not urgency.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Jonathan Hall  monitors extremism as part of  

  • his role reviewing Britain's terrorism laws.

  • JONATHAN HALL K.C.: I haven't seen such open  hostility towards categories of individuals  

  • as I have since the 7th of OctoberThat willingness, almost a brazenness  

  • to go out on the streets and to be really  vile and horrible and invite hatred and  

  • in some circumstances violence against people by  category is something that we haven't really seen.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: In Brighton, demonstration  organizer Russell Craddock gave his verdict  

  • on Rishi Sunak's plans to crack down on extremism.

  • RUSSELL CRADDOCK: We won't be intimidated by  Sunak. We won't be intimidated by the Met. We  

  • won't be intimidated by so-called  claims of violent antisemitism.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: But this was Russell Craddock  the day after the Hamas terrorist attack.

  • RUSSELL CRADDOCK: So, amazingly, incrediblymost of the Hamas fighters paraglided their way.

  • (CHEERING)

  • JONATHAN HALL K.C.: Someone who glorifiesterrorist organization and is reckless, so  

  • takes the risk that someone will be encouraged to  support that organization, does commit an offense.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: The Kaddishtraditional Jewish prayer of mourning,  

  • next to a memorial that has  frequently been vandalized.

  • Across town, white flags for the  Palestinian dead, and that chant,  

  • which local police say can warrant  arrest in aggravating circumstances.

  • PROTESTER: From the river to the sea! PROTESTERS: Palestine will be free!

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: We approached  the man with the megaphone.

  • From American TV. Can I ask you a question please?

  • PROTESTER: Go ahead. MALCOLM BRABANT: Can you just explain to me...

  • (CROSSTALK) PROTESTER: Don't -- don't..

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: No, I'm allowed to  do this because this is a public...

  • PROTESTER: No, you're not  allowed to take photo of me.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Yes, I am.  I'm -- it's a public space.

  • PROTESTER: We're here to support people  that have been massacred and murdered,  

  • children and babies, and you're here  sticking (INAUDIBLE) in people's faces.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: No. PROTESTER: Don't you think that's disgraceful?

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: No, I don't. I'm  just merely asking a question.

  • (CROSSTALK)

  • PROTESTER: No, you're not.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Yes, I am. PROTESTER: You came and picked on this man.

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: Because he was actually chanting.

  • PROTESTERS: Palestine! Free, free, Palestine! PROTESTER: From the river to the sea!

  • MALCOLM BRABANT: The police  ushered us away because, here,  

  • asking questions risks a breach of the peace.

  • For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Malcolm Brabant.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: The foreign policy focus of President  Biden's State of the Union address tonight will  

  • be on Israel and Ukraine. And he will present  himself as a steady steward of American interests  

  • around the world, drawing a contrast between  his approach and former President Trump's.

  • A new book examines how President  Biden's foreign policies break,  

  • but sometimes embrace his predecessors.

  • Here's Nick Schifrin with more.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: When Joe Biden became presidenthe proudly declared, "America is back."

  • He and his administration believed  that former President Donald Trump  

  • and his administration had mistreated  allies, become an unreliable partner,  

  • and pursued misplaced priorities. But did the  Biden administration really abandon Trump's  

  • foreign policy? How did the collapse of Kabul  humble Biden's most senior aides? And how has  

  • the administration's strategy shifted, as it faces  two unexpected wars in Europe and the Middle East?

  • That is the story told in the  new book, "The Internationalists:  

  • The Fight to Restore American Foreign Policy  After Trump." The author is Alexander Ward,  

  • a national security reporter at Politico.

  • Alex, thanks very much. Pleasure to have you here.

  • Let's start in Afghanistan.

  • You write: "For an administration that  felt America had to be humble about the  

  • limits of their power, the preparation  for Afghanistan was coated in hubris."

  • How?

  • ALEXANDER WARD, Author, "The InternationalistsThe Fight to Restore American Foreign Policy  

  • After Trump": Well, part of it was that they  expected, basically, that they could end the  

  • war with minimal chaos. They expected chaos, to be  clear, but not for it to be as chaotic as it was.

  • Part of it was that the intelligence they had  at the time of the decision to leave was that  

  • it would take 18 to 24 months for the Taliban  to take over. And they didn't actually really  

  • question that intelligence or that timelineeven though there was even open-source material  

  • showing that the Taliban was ready for  a pretty quick sweep across the country.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: And, of coursethere were internal people in  

  • the State Department sayingthat intelligence was wrong.

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Precisely.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: A senior official told you that:  "Had we known we only had a few months after  

  • the president's decision in April to withdraw, we  would have done things differently, probably so."

  • Do we have any idea what they would  have done differently had they known?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Really fast-track  the rebuild of the SIV program,  

  • the Special Immigrant Visa program, which was to  bring Afghan allies of Americans back to the U.S.

  • One of the reasons they hadn't scaled  that up so quickly, well, part of it was,  

  • it was decimated in the Trump years, but the  other was they thought they had 18 to 24 months,  

  • so that was something that they could  work on sort of in the longer term.

  • Another might have been the Pentagon  decided speed was safety. They went  

  • faster than even the White House and some of  the State Department expected. So I think,  

  • in the rethink of how this could have happenedone would have been a greater coordination  

  • between all the agencies, and especially  on how quickly the military would leave,  

  • because that will -- that shrunk some of  the options available to the administration.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: You have this extraordinary  anecdote about that lack of coordination,  

  • or at least part of the  debate between state and DOD.

  • You write about a meeting in whichState Department official told four-stars,  

  • including the chairman of the  Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley,  

  • sitting across the table that -- quote --  "The State Department had a higher risk  

  • threshold than the soldiers at the tableand Milley nearly jumped out of his chair."

  • How did that tension between  state and DOD play out?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: The State Department  was preparing to stay in Kabul. They  

  • were preparing for a longer mission therebut it was the Pentagon that was saying,  

  • it's time to go, right? The weakest part  of a military is one that is retreating.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: While they're retreating.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: That's what  they were worried about, yes.

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Preciselyyes, while they're retreating.

  • So, in that case, there was just  a mismatch in what the goals were.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Despite the chaos, you write  that, afterward, there was never any serious  

  • reckoning inside the administration about  Afghanistan. No one offered to resign,  

  • in large part because the president did  not believe anyone had made a mistake.

  • That is an extraordinary thing. Why not?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Because, at the end of the day,  

  • it was the right strategic decision to  leave. That's how the administration sees it.

  • Now, with all that's going on in the  world today, they would argue, look,  

  • isn't it great that we're out ofwar we couldn't win after 20 years,  

  • that the military had no real solution  for, that we spent a lot of money,  

  • time and treasure to execute? And so  it makes sense that we would leave.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: How much of the  disaster in Afghanistan informed  

  • their decision-making ahead of  the Ukraine full-scale invasion?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Quite a bit. They wanted a lot more coordination between the  agencies. They wanted to let allies know what they  

  • were doing. So, when the Ukraine intelligence  was coming to the fore, the U.S. said, look,  

  • tell our allies what we're up to, what we  know, tell the Ukrainians what we know,  

  • get every agency coordinated, build a Tiger Teamright, work on every single possible scenario.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: The other focus, of coursefor the administration today is Israel.

  • And you write about the early days of  the Biden administration dealing with  

  • the crisis in Israel and Gaza. And you chronicle  Joe Biden's decades-long support for Israel and,  

  • as you put it, strategy of honey  in public, vinegar on the phone.

  • How's that played out, not only what  you write about in 2021-'22, but today?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Well, if you talk to  the Biden administration, in 2021,  

  • it worked quite well, because that conflictwhile deadly and brutal, ended after 11 days.

  • And for October 7, the attack of  October 7, which, of course, was brutal,  

  • and 1,200 people died in one day, then you, of  course, have a far right government in Israel,  

  • and you have a public reeling after what they sawAnd so it's a much bigger, different context than  

  • it was in 2021. The administration still uses that  playbook, the honey in public, vinegar in private.

  • But with that context, with  that different context,  

  • it's harder to have as much suasion over  the Israelis as the U.S. had in 2021.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: You quote an administration  official in 2021 saying that the team was  

  • not putting a -- quote -- "effing second  of effort into a two-state solution."

  • Did that have an impact in today's war?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: It's -- potentiallyright We don't really know.

  • But one of the things critics were sayingfrom -- really from the Trump administration  

  • through the Biden administration, was that you  can focus on the Abraham Accords and you can  

  • focus on normalization deals all you want, but the  Israeli-Palestinian issue is still there, and it's  

  • still festering. And so if you leave that wound  to fester, it'll eventually cause you problems.

  • And so, and with the Biden administration, they  really felt that a bank shot was better, that you  

  • could maybe get to the Palestinian-Israeli  conflict through the normalization deals.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: And that's one example, I  think, of something that you rightly point  

  • out. How has the Biden administration  not abandoned Trump foreign policy?

  • ALEXANDER WARD: We cannot deny that there  are many elements of Trumpism in Bidenism,  

  • one of which would be the competition with Chinakeeping export controls on them, keeping the  

  • tariff war going, one of which would also be the  Abraham Accords, right? That's a continuation of  

  • Trump era policy, and this general railing against  free trade and globalization, a sense that we have  

  • to protect a lot of our industries here at home  in order to make life better for the middle class.

  • You don't get the Biden administration  foreign policy without Trump's win. It  

  • is born from the trauma of Trump's victoryJake Sullivan, the national security adviser,  

  • is right there next to Hillary Clinton when she's  conceding to Trump. And what he's thinking is,  

  • hey, I was born in the traditional  Democratic foreign policy thinking.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Minnesota. ALEXANDER WARD: A Minnesota boy. How did I lose

  • populist politics to a New York  billionaire real estate magnate?

  • And so he spends four years trying to figure  out how to do this. And that thinking,  

  • this foreign policy for the middle  class epithet, has become the  

  • underlying intellectual framework for what  we have seen in this administration so far.

  • NICK SCHIFRIN: Alex Ward.

  • The book is "The Internationalists: The Fight  to Restore American Foreign Policy After Trump."

  • Thank you very much.

  • ALEXANDER WARD: Thanks for having me.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: And we will be back shortly for  

  • a look at the barriers to Internet  access in some tribal communities.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: But, first, take a moment to  hear from your local PBS station. It's a  

  • chance to offer your support, which helps  to keep programs like this on the air.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: For those of you staying with us,  

  • growth in the global art market  is spawning some new investors.

  • Economics correspondent Paul Solman takes  a look at the prudence of investing in  

  • art in this encore report for our  arts and culture series, Canvas.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: The grand opening of ARTEX,  a European art stock market, which plans  

  • to start trading soon, selling shares in art  like this Francis Bacon, one work at a time.

  • YASSIR BENJELLOUN-TOUIMI, ARTEX: We  are the equivalent of Nasdaq. We love  

  • the New York Stock Exchange  or the London Stock Exchange.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Co-Founder and  CEO Yassir Benjelloun-Touimi.

  • YASSIR BENJELLOUN-TOUIMI: Instead of  buying a corporate share in a company,  

  • you buy a share into a masterpiece.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: One of 550,000  shares in a triptych by the  

  • late English painter Francis Bacon  of his lover George Dyer. An IPO,  

  • a public offering, with shares priced at  $100 each. And what do I get for that?

  • YASSIR BENJELLOUN-TOUIMI: You  get the appreciation in exact  

  • way. You get the appreciation if  you're buying an ounce of gold.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Now ARTEX is the latest firm to sell

  • shares in individual works  of art, but not the first.

  • KELLY CROW, The Wall Street Journal: In the past,  

  • collectors and dealers have often  bought things in small consortiums.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Wall Street Journal  art market correspondent Kelly Crow.

  • KELLY CROW: The British Railway Pension did  sort of pioneer this idea that you could  

  • pool your money and buy better things  and hold it for a time and resell it.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: So somebody can buy a share ofthis is a Warhol or a reproduction of a Warhol,  

  • that you own. But nowadays, New York's  masterworks already sells art shares to  

  • the public, as you would stocks. Chief  Investment Officer Allen Sukholitsky.

  • ALLEN SUKHOLITSKY, MasterworksMasterworks is a firm that makes  

  • art and investable asset classThe first firm that's ever done it,  

  • we started in 2017, so we've been  doing it now for several years.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: During which the firm's value  has climbed to more than $1 million it says.  

  • Employees beating the bushes for marketable  high value artwork and customers to whom to  

  • hawk shares in a masterwork like  an Andy Warhol or a Yayoi Kusama.

  • ALLEN SUKHOLITSKY: She's actually about 100  years old, which is always interesting. It  

  • tells you that artists have definitely  cracked the code on living forever.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: The usual minimum investment,  

  • $15,000, for shares of an artwork whose  price is derived from an auction database  

  • tracking 7000 artists post-World War IIMasterworks says it only buys blue chips.

  • Artists like Warhol and Kusama, whose values have  

  • outperformed the stock and bond markets  for the past 20 years, Ed Ruscha, KAWS,  

  • supposedly Masterwork backed securities

  • KELLY CROW: The art market is just  super unregulated. It's kind of like  

  • a wild West. And if you want to buy $100  share just for kicks in the same way that  

  • you would go to a baseball game just to have  fun and see how something does roll the dice,  

  • have some fun. I just I would be a little  nervous. You know, taking out a second mortgage.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Even for a painting is highly  

  • valued in the current market  as the Francis Bacon triptych?

  • KELLY CROW: These George Dyer Triptychs  that sold in 2017 for mid $50 million  

  • are important because that lover eventually  committed suicide on the eve of a major show  

  • of Bacon's. We really love the soap opera of an  artist's life and how that feeds into the work.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Contemporary art consultant Alex Glauber, who helped his  client by this work by Alex de Court.  

  • Glauber has sold to Masterworks, so  an art stock market is a good thing.

  • ALEX GLAUBER: Certainly brings more  money and attention to the art market,  

  • but I don't know if it's necessarily healthy  for art and the appreciation of art long term.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Why not?

  • ALEX GLAUBER: Why? Because if the  conversation is more about the  

  • money than the art that really devalues  and undermines the very purpose of art.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: But the argument is, I will  start out with it as an investment. Then  

  • I will get interested in it and I will learn  more about it. I will become an art appreciator.

  • ALEX GLAUBER: But if what you're trying to  learn about is why this is a savvy investment,  

  • why this artist is poised  for an uptick in their value,  

  • that's very much at odds with what perhaps put  that artist in that position in the first place.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: In other words, we're talking  speculation, as in some 1000 Picasso's and  

  • innumerable other brand name works stored in  warehouses around the world. Or more recently,  

  • speculation in digital NFTs, non-fungible tokensthat boomed and then swooned. Since I interviewed  

  • investor Lin Dai barely a year ago. OK, so what's  happened to the NFT market since last we talked?

  • LIN DAI, NFT Entrepreneur: Yeah. You know,  

  • there's a lot of have changed. We  saw this speculative bubble pop.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Which had seen  Lin Dai's Bored Ape NFT double  

  • in value to $400,000 before falling  back down to around $100,000 today,  

  • by his estimate. You have second thoughtsMisgivings about having bought your Bored Ape?

  • LIN DAI: No, absolutely not. I think certainly the  Bored Ape probably will hold its value over time.

  • PAUL SOLMAN: Unlike, say Jozef Israels' Pancake  Day, which fetched more than a million pounds in  

  • 1895. A billion or more dollars todaydepending on how you convert prices.  

  • Israels' largest painting at auction in recent  years brought $35,000. Just one of countless  

  • examples that illustrate what philosopher Barbara  Herrnstein Smith calls the contingencies of value.

  • BARBARA HERRNSTEIN SMITH, Philosopher: Value is  not fixed, inherent objective and part of objects,  

  • but the product of numerous interactions between  people and things in their universe. It's  

  • contingent in the sense that what effects those  interactions changes. The question is always going  

  • to be will it continue to be valued over timeNot will it continue to have value over time?

  • PAUL SOLMAN: And thus for the investment  value of art, we've learned to prize from  

  • Leonardo and Rembrandt to Israels, Van  Gogh and Picasso, Bacon, Warhol, Kusama,  

  • a Bored Ape. Time will tell if we fickle mortalswill continue valuing them as we do today.

  • For the "PBS NewsHour," Paul  Solman, mostly in New York.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: For many tribal  communities in America,  

  • Internet access isn't always as easy as  logging on to a computer. The FCC reports,  

  • almost 28 percent of tribal land residents  lack high-speed broadband, compared to  

  • 1.5 percent of urban residents. The Biden  administration is offering funds to change that.

  • But as student reporter Maria Staubs from  Arizona State University's Cronkite School  

  • of Journalism tells us, better  connectivity may not be enough.

  • MARIA STAUBS: This construction project  on the Tohono O'odham Nation is bringing  

  • the 21st century to a rural part of Arizona.

  • TONYA JOAQUIN, Vaya Chin  Resident: Here on the reservation,  

  • our connection with the Internet is  kind of sparse, so it's here or there.

  • MARIA STAUBS: The Tohono O'odham  Utility Authority is laying down  

  • a fiber optic network to provide  high-speed Internet to members of  

  • the nation. It's thanks to a $10 million  grant from the Department of Agriculture.

  • TONYA JOAQUIN: We are moving  more towards the technology era,  

  • and we don't want to get left behind.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Vaya Chin resident Tonya  Joaquin says the high-speed Internet  

  • will improve her family's  education and health care.

  • TONYA JOAQUIN: We live about, whattwo hours, 2.5 hours away from town.  

  • My son will have telemed. So, he sees  a doctor out at the Phoenix Children's  

  • Hospital. We don't have to drive thereWe have a home visit on the Internet.

  • KRISTAN JOHNSON, Tohono O'odham  Utility Authority: We're able to  

  • educate and teach our tribal  membership of all ages.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Kristan Johnson manages  operations for the tribe's main Internet  

  • service provider. She says broadband will  provide opportunities for economic development.

  • KRISTAN JOHNSON: Whether they're basket weavers,  

  • they are dressmakers, they  harvest, or whatever they do,  

  • they're able to put that on the Internet and be  able to sell it and be -- help themselves out.

  • MARIA STAUBS: While members of the  nation have welcomed the investment  

  • in broadband infrastructure, there  are fundamental barriers that  

  • prevent its full implementation in Native  American communities, high on the list,  

  • access to a computer or a smartphone at home  and an understanding of how to use them.

  • BRIAN FICKETT, General Manager, Tohono  O'odham Utility Authority: We have elders  

  • that they don't even know what Internet is.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Brian Fickett is the  general manager of the agency that  

  • provides Internet and cell service to the tribe.

  • BRIAN FICKETT: These folks will be able to connect  at home, just like they would off the reservation.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Here at the Tohono O'odham Community  College, a computer literacy training program  

  • provides 10 members from each district  with education on how to use the Internet.

  • MAN: Your subject line right here.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Lessons can be as simple as sending  

  • an e-mail. Anselmo Ramon is one  of the leaders of the program.

  • ANSELMO RAMON, Tohono O'odham Community  College: We train them from the very  

  • basics of the components, move them  up to the features on the keyboard,  

  • move them up to turning it, like, on and off.

  • MARIA STAUBS: There are students of all ages  here. Some are familiar with the technology.

  • JUANITA HOMER, Student: It's been over  five years since I used a computer. So,  

  • this is really helping me to learn more.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Others are starting fresh.

  • FRANCINE JOSE, Student: It's really new to me.  

  • Everything's new to me. I have  never been on the computers.

  • MARIA STAUBS: Funding for the computer  training course lasts only two years,  

  • so Anselmo Ramon has devised a plan to  grow computer literacy throughout his  

  • tribal nation. It relies on students  passing on their newfound knowledge.

  • ANSELMO RAMON: So, in train the trainerwe want to train 10 people. In turn,  

  • we want those people to train another  family member or a friend or a co-worker.

  • MARIA STAUBS: It's a practical solution  because tribal members understand, before  

  • they can run with high-speed Internetthey have to first learn how to walk.

  • For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Maria Staubs with  Cronkite News on the Tohono O'odham tribal lands.

  • AMNA NAWAZ: And don't forget to join  us later tonight for our live coverage  

  • of President Biden's State of the Union address.

  • We will have full coverage of the  president's speech, as well as analysis  

  • from our correspondents and our expert panel. That  starts at 9:00 p.m. Eastern right here on PBS.

  • And that is the "NewsHourfor tonight. I'm Amna Nawaz.

  • GEOFF BENNETT: And I'm Geoff Bennett.

  • We hope we will see you later this evening.

AMNA NAWAZ: Good evening. I'm Amna Nawaz.

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

B1 US

PBS NewsHour full episode, March 7, 2024

  • 18 2
    林宜悉 posted on 2024/03/08
Video vocabulary