Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • It's Friday, Friday, gotta get my fries on Friday

  • Not sure the bigger size is worth it, worth it

  • Friday, Friday, calculating value on Friday

  • Still not sure the bigger size is worth it, worth it

  • Supersize, supersize, yeah!

  • Supersize, supersize, yeah!

  • This song's hopefully not gonna get flagged for copyright

  • Do people even know that reference anymore?

  • Is this- this- this a thing?

  • This is- this an old one

  • This is an old one

  • Hello internet!

  • Welcome to Food Theory!

  • The show where you come for the crispy golden nuggets of knowledge and stay for the extra bits at the bottom of the bag

  • As many of you who've watched my shows for some time know fast food was a huge part of my early life

  • It was my home cooking in the 90s

  • An era when happy meals weren't being weighed down by options like juice or apples or bean sprouts or whatever healthy stuff is in there these days

  • What is this stuff?

  • Ugh!

  • They're not even giving kids cavities or an unhealthy BMI

  • How can you even call it a happy meal?

  • No, my healthy choice was drinking an orange high C instead of soda and then getting in kindergarten brawls over those happy meal toys that were shaped like hamburgers and ice cream cones but then turned into dinosaurs

  • Wait, you can get a full set of those for $15 online right now?

  • What a steal!

  • I mean, definitely didn't just put in my bit so there's no need to go searching for that

  • No, leave that alone

  • That isn't a thing that really exists

  • As I got older, I got smarter and also poorer and I realized that the kids meal is kind of a racket for the amount of food that you get

  • So I switched to buying a regular hamburger and fries but turns out that that was just the tip of my frugal frosty friends

  • I learned to maximize that dollar menu through my poor years as a college student my poor years as an actor my poor years as an unemployed YouTuber

  • You get the idea!

  • Anyway, there is a whole world of fast food economizing out there at my grease-covered fingertips but in all the years and all the fast food since then

  • I've never done a comprehensive test to see what was the most efficient order out there

  • So today, we're starting with the most universally loved fast food item on the planet the one that sparks furious debates no matter where you're from especially here in the US

  • What is the best french fry order?

  • And today, I'm not measuring the best french fry based on things that matter

  • You know, like taste or some kind of nutritional value

  • Let's face it, taste is subjective

  • Or is it?

  • A theory for another day

  • And nutritional value is kind of a moot point

  • We're talking about the french fry here

  • No, today it's all about dollars and cents

  • If I want my fry fix, what is the best type of fry to buy and what is the best size to buy it in?

  • I think the conventional wisdom is that larger sizes are always going to provide you a better value

  • But has anyone ever really tested that?

  • Are we sure that we can trust that McDonald's supersized fry is really delivering us a supersized value?

  • What if it's something random?

  • Like the medium is the best fry to buy

  • And then what about different fry types?

  • Like what about Arby's curly fries?

  • Would there be a different strategy to upsizing those?

  • All I want to know is what the perfect fast food french fry order is

  • What is going to get me the most fry for my buck?

  • And the good news is that I'm no longer in the backseat of the drive-thru

  • So the only thing stopping me from getting a dozen orders of french fries

  • And conducting a pseudo-scientific study of fry optimization

  • Is my concern for my own well-being

  • But this, my friends, is in the name of science

  • And on behalf of all the consumers out there

  • So I'm willing to go through as many fries as I have to

  • To get to that crispy golden truth

  • Get out your Sam's Club size bottles of ketchup

  • Or mayonnaise if you're one of the weirdos

  • Or both if you happen to be from Idaho

  • And get ready to dip into the science and economics of the french fry

  • We're going to get some french fries

  • Let's do some scientific experiments and fast food drive-thrus

  • Woo!

  • We're gonna get so much fried potato, it's crazy

  • Here's how the study works

  • Steph and I wanted to test all the major fry shapes

  • Shoestring, thicker natural cut fries, curly fries, and waffle cut

  • Since fry prices vary between regions

  • We conducted the test in three different markets

  • Los Angeles, New York, and Raleigh, North Carolina

  • This also narrowed down the list of fast food restaurants available to us

  • Because any fry we chose to test had to be available in all three locations

  • This means that we won't be covering an exhaustive list of every fast food restaurant out there

  • This is also to prevent everyone from getting their undies in a bunch

  • Because I didn't cover their regional favorite like In-N-Out or Whataburger

  • You guys can take those arguments to the comments section

  • The focus here is on covering a representative, nationally available sample of each fry type

  • That way you can apply the principles of french fry efficiency to your regional favorites as well

  • So based on these four major categories

  • I targeted McDonald's for their shoestring fries

  • Wendy's for their thicker cut natural fry

  • Arby's for curly fries

  • And Chick-fil-A for waffle fries

  • Sorry Carl's Jr.

  • You really need to get some locations here in North Carolina

  • Which I know that Hardee's is technically supposed to be the same thing

  • But it's a different franchise name and thus I couldn't go with it

  • It's introducing an extraneous variable into our hardcore scientific method

  • And for a YouTube video, mildly educational about the topic of food

  • That will not stand

  • Twisty, curly, cross-cut, natural

  • Whatever McDonald's makes, we're getting them all

  • Can I get a one order of each?

  • Small, medium, and large

  • But could they all be bagged separately?

  • We got an order of small, medium, and large fries from each of the establishments mentioned

  • Except for Chick-fil-A

  • Which didn't offer a small at every location we visited

  • So we only considered their medium and large waffle fry for the experiment

  • Also Arby's didn't have their snack size at all three locations

  • So that too was left out of the experiment

  • But as for the 11 fry orders that were available in all locations

  • We got each in a separate bag to reduce any ambiguity of which bagler fries came from which order

  • Then we used a digital scale to weigh each order of fries without the packaging

  • So we put the bowl on top and then we tear it

  • So that way anything we add is just fry weight

  • This will let us know in raw terms how much fry we're getting in each order of each size

  • We can compare that to the price of each order of fries to figure out

  • Which is in fact the most efficient fry order

  • But we also wanted to get a sense of how effectively each order of fries filled its container

  • Because fry containers can either be these soft little baggies

  • Or these big honking cardboard tubes

  • That'll tell us how well or badly each fry shape has actually been engineered for its container

  • And which restaurant really wants to make it look like they're serving up jumbo fries

  • When actually they're just serving up a bunch of jumbo air

  • So we sealed any cracks or openings in the fry containers

  • Then filled them with sifted all-purpose flour to get a sense of the total capacity of each container

  • This in turn will help us better understand what I call the fry fill percentage or FFP

  • I use my numbers to calculate a whole battery of different things

  • Not just the FFP which tells me how fry filled each container is

  • But also the number of grams of fry I'm getting per cent of money that I'm spending

  • And the number of calories per cent I'm spending

  • Based on the nutritional facts given on each chain's website

  • To make sure that I'm getting the most calories for my bucks

  • To get our price and mass values, we average the results from all three test cities

  • Put them all in one big table and you get something that looks like this

  • Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the fry efficiency data table

  • Ooh, much data

  • Using all of these calculations, we can determine which order of fries is optimal

  • In terms of its monetary value against its competition

  • Which order fills its own container most effectively

  • And which delivers the greatest caloric punch per cent that you're spending

  • Let's see how they did, shall we?

  • Starting with what we all care about most, the money

  • At a glance, the McDonald's small fries

  • Ugh, I hate saying it that way

  • The McDonald's small fry jumps out as the least expensive on the entire board

  • Our goal here though is to find out if the best deal on paper is actually the best deal

  • Or if a lot of those fry packs are full of hot air, literally

  • In our results, we found that none of the small sizes of fry

  • Was the most cost effective for its respective restaurant

  • Playing into the idea that if you pay a little bit more

  • Well, you're gonna get a little bit more fry for your buck

  • At least to a point

  • The best cost per gram on the small sizes did indeed come from McDonald's

  • Who weighed in at 1.76 cents per gram

  • Meaning that if you absolutely have to get yourself a small fry

  • Your best bet is a shoestring fry, specifically from McDonald's

  • Upsizing, as you might expect, and as they advertise

  • Does indeed tend to save you money across all fry types

  • With the biggest difference happening at Arby's

  • Where going from a small to a medium saves you 45%

  • In fact, it turns out that the curly fry category is a total wild card

  • Not only did the Arby's medium curly fry wind up being cheaper per gram than the large

  • There were actually more fries in my medium order than I got in my large order

  • You heard that right

  • We actually paid, on average, 23 cents more for the large

  • And got less total fry in the order

  • The medium had a miraculously efficient cost of 1.35 cents per gram

  • Coming in third behind McDonald's large shoestring fry at 1.26 per gram

  • And the Wendy's large natural cut at 1.32 cents per gram

  • So generally, you can expect to receive more fry mass for your dollar by ordering a large

  • Except at Arby's, where the large is actually giving you a negligible amount

  • If not less than the medium

  • Now, there are a lot of fast food conspiracy theories online

  • One of which is about workers being told to underfill the largest fry containers

  • To save pennies on the dollar

  • And I was wondering if my Arby's results was a potential example of this

  • I don't actually think that's what's really going on

  • I do think there's an inherent problem with curly fries

  • But it's not a problem with the people

  • It's a problem with the packaging

  • Let's talk fry efficiency metric number two

  • The FFP, fry fill percentage

  • While the value per unit of fry tended to increase as the sizes of the orders got larger

  • The opposite is actually true for the fill percentages

  • Larger packages tended to result in more empty space

  • But the shape of the fries and the shape of their containers

  • Greatly seemed to determine how full the packaging could actually get

  • Viewers of my other channels might remember

  • I did an episode of film theory a couple years ago

  • Where I calculated how much money Scrooge McDuck would have

  • Partially by determining how much empty space would be left

  • By the packing of gold coins stacked in his vault

  • I found in that episode's research that when you're stacking rigid gold coins

  • The maximum packing that you could get was only at about 57%

  • And we're gonna find that french fry packing is actually significantly worse than that

  • The least efficient fries were the waffle fries from Chick-fil-A

  • Which makes sense for a lot of reasons

  • One of these is that the fries are just larger

  • So there's less room for them to pack densely together

  • But another is that the holes in the waffle shape

  • Guarantee that there's gonna be empty space within the fries

  • In addition to between the fries

  • The packing of the Arby's fries is also tricky

  • The curliest of those curly fries

  • Which I'll refer to here as springs

  • Are essentially cylinders

  • And Arby's fry containers are roughly cylindrical too

  • If we ignore height and those little irregular curly fries

  • The boomerangs, I call them

  • The ones that are basically just little lies that remind us how good the springs are

  • Then we're talking about how we pack circles into other circles

  • An exercise that'll always leave us with a ton of empty space

  • It also explains why the weight of fries in the Arby's medium

  • And the Arby's large were almost exactly the same

  • The large is only about half an inch wider than the medium

  • Which actually isn't wide enough to fit another spring into the box of fries

  • Meaning the effective capacity of the medium and the large

  • Is practically the same

  • The only thing that can be added to the larger box

  • Are a few anemic little boomerangs

  • Which, let's face it, means we might as well be eating a regular fry

  • With a hunchback that tastes burnt

  • I hate those things

  • Now is this corporate greed?

  • Are they using geometry to their advantage?

  • Because it could be intentionally designed this way

  • After all, fast food companies are penny margin businesses

  • Meaning that they look for ways to save fractions of a penny on menu items

  • To keep their prices low

  • So maybe?

  • The argument can certainly be made

  • But facts?

  • Well, we'll never know

  • That said, on the other side of the coin

  • McDonald's and Wendy's are relatively efficient at packing their fries

  • With Wendy's being particularly good

  • Since its cuboid-shaped fries fit well in the Wendy's rectangular containers

  • Slightly better than the McDonald's containers, which are more elliptical

  • Indeed, we find Wendy's natural cut fries to have the best fill rate on average

  • At nearly 53%

  • The best individual for fill rate, however, comes in at a big surprise

  • The McDonald's small

  • Not because of the shape of the McDonald's shoestring fry

  • Or because of the shape of the container

  • But because of the material of the container

  • The McDonald's small is the only one of these 11 fry servings

  • To be served in a paper bag

  • Rather than a rigid cardboard container

  • So the bag can actually act more like a fluid

  • It can conform to whatever shape it needs to

  • In order to accommodate for the most fries possible

  • The fill rate for this serving was about 57.5%

  • So if you're one of those people who gets really bummed out

  • About all the empty space that you find when you open up a bag of Doritos

  • The McDonald's small fry is the order for you

  • The last metric we want to consider for fry efficiency is caloric load against cost

  • What's getting me the most calories for my dollar?

  • Well, most of us are trying to minimize our calories

  • In the event of an apocalypse where you want to stash fries

  • And make sure you pick the most calorically dense version for the best price

  • I got you covered right now

  • This one is Arby's in a landslide

  • As they take three of the top five spots in calories per cent

  • So reach for those small and curlies

  • If you're doomsday prepping and want some old french fries

  • To be a part of that for some reason

  • And with that we tabulate our results

  • Taking into consideration total value and cost per gram

  • Fill ratio of the container and calories per cent spent

  • Our optimized french fry champion is

  • Oh man, not another drumroll gag

  • I'll just say it

  • Wendy's large fries with an impressive 26 points

  • Out of what would have been a perfect score of 30

  • Our runner-up was the Arby's medium with 22 points

  • And in last place was the Chick-fil-A medium waffle fry

  • With just 8 points overall

  • And never, never, never order an Arby's large

  • If you're ordering at Arby's always order a medium

  • So there you have it friends

  • Wendy's large fries and Arby's medium

  • The two most efficient fry purchases of them all

  • The last real question I'm left with today is

  • Whether dipping your large Wendy's fries in a frosty means you're genius or disgusting

  • Oh, and the other question I have is

  • If that subscribe button remains unclicked

  • Consider remedying that right now

  • In case you didn't know

  • This is just one of five videos that we've released as part of our channel launch today

  • So keep going, keep watching

  • You are only 20% of the way there

  • You can do it

  • Achieve full completion my friends

  • I believe in you

  • If you manage to watch all five today

  • You get the theorist seal of approval

  • Seriously, we would love to have you as a subscriber

  • As we strike out into this new and delicious world of food science and edutainment

  • If you made it this far into the video

  • You must have liked what you saw, right?

  • So nothing is preventing you from smashing that subscribe button right now

  • So do it, do it, please

  • Please hit subscribe

  • It would be nice if this channel did well

  • I'm really enjoying doing food theories

  • Please help this channel be a success

  • But hey, that's just a theory

  • A food theory

  • Bon appetit

It's Friday, Friday, gotta get my fries on Friday

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it