agreeing that President Obama overstepped his powers. Which begs the question, what

powers does the Executive Branch actually have?

Well, let's start with the general stuff. He has the power to veto or approve bills,

pardon people, command our military, sign treaties, nominate judges and nominate people

to fill any other position whose appointments are not otherwise provided for in the Constitution.

Meaning he appoints pretty much everybody but Congress itself.

Congress does have the right to approve his appointees, but only when they are in session.

If congress is on recess, the President can appoint whomever he wants.

This is where the court says he over stepped his powers recently. He filled vacancies on

The National Labor Relations Board without the consent of congress, while congress was

technically still in session.

They weren't actually in session, but they also weren't away long enough for them to

be considered on recess... constitutionally speaking congress has to be out of session

for 10 days for it be considered recess.

It's a weird loophole and it's not the only weird loophole when you're talking about Presidential

Powers.

The President has the power to prepare the budget, which allows him to set much of the

agenda. And, with congressional approval, his suggested budget can cut funding to programs

he doesn't agree with. Though in the end, it's just a suggested budget; congress is

under no obligation to answer his request... and they usually just ignore it altogether.

The president has power of executive privilege, meaning that he can withhold information from

the public in matters of national security.

But it has to actually be a matter of national security.

Clinton tried to use this power during the Monica Lewinski scandal. The Supreme Court

didn't allow it, because hooking up with an intern is not a matter of national security.

After that, talking about Presidential powers becomes more vague.

The President can issue executive orders. These orders only apply to the operations

of the Executive Branch, but seeing as things like the defense department, NSA, FBI and

pretty much every other influential agency are under the Executive Branch, these can

be wide reaching powers.

Executive orders don't have to be approved by congress. The President can just make them

up. And in order to get them off the books the Supreme Court has to rule that they are

unconstitutional.

When people are talking about Presidents potentially abusing their powers, executive orders are

usually what they're referring to.

During times of war or national threat we tend to see more executive orders. FDR issued

3,728 of them, whereas Ronald Reagan issued less than 381.

Barack Obama, to date, has only issued 175. Still, some see Obama's use of Executive orders

as an overreach of his powers. His decision to send troops into Libya without congressional

consent is one good example of one order that has garnered some criticism.

The president can also issue memorandums. These are not as binding as Executive Orders,

but they still have a wide reaching impact. Obama for example issued a memorandum asking

federal agencies to start getting at least 20% of their energy from renewable energy

sources by 2020. It's not a law, but it is a recommended change in how our government

does things. And it does happen without the consent of congress.

Lucky for us the Supreme Court can review executive orders and memorandums, and if the

president steps outside the powers granted him by the constitution, they can knock him

back in line.

Like they did with the current presidential appointee snafu.

If you have anything you want us to cover, let us know in the comments. And to see our

video on the Terrorist group Boko Haram, please click now.

And remember - we put up new episodes five days a week, so please subscribe.