Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • When positive charges move in this direction,

  • then per definition, we say the current goes in this

  • direction. When negative charges go in

  • this direction, we also say the current goes in

  • that direction, that's just our convention.

  • If I apply a potential difference over a conductor,

  • then I'm going to create an electric field in that

  • conductor. And the electrons -- there are

  • free electrons in a conductor -- they can move,

  • but the ions cannot move, because they are frozen into

  • the solid, into the crystal. And so when a current flows in

  • a conductor, it's always the electrons that are responsible

  • for the current. The electrons fuel the electric

  • fields, and then the electrons try to make the electric field

  • zero, but they can't succeed, because we keep the potential

  • difference over the conductor. Often, there is a linear

  • relationship between current and the potential,

  • in which case, we talk about Ohm's Law.

  • Now, I will try to derive Ohm's Law

  • in a very crude way, a poor man's version,

  • and not really one hundred percent kosher,

  • it requires quantum mechanics, which is beyond the course --

  • beyond this course -- but I will do a job that still gives us

  • some interesting insight into Ohm's Law.

  • If I start off with a conductor, for instance,

  • copper, at room temperature, three hundred degrees Kelvin,

  • the free electrons in copper have a speed,

  • an average speed of about a million meters per second.

  • So this is the average speed of those free electrons,

  • about a million meters per second.

  • This in all directions. It's a chaotic motion.

  • It's a thermal motion, it's due to the temperature.

  • The time between collisions -- time between the collisions --

  • and this is a collision of the free electron with the atoms --

  • is approximately -- I call it tau --

  • is about three times ten to the minus fourteen seconds.

  • No surprise, because the speed is enormously

  • high. And the number of free

  • electrons in copper per cubic meter, I call that number N,

  • is about ten to the twenty-nine.

  • There's about one free electron for every atom.

  • So we get twen- ten to the twenty-nine free electrons per

  • cubic meter. So now imagine that I apply a

  • potential difference piece of copper -- or any conductor,

  • for that matter -- then the electrons will experience a

  • force which is the charge of the electron, that's my little E

  • times the electric field that I'm creating,

  • because I apply a potential difference.

  • I realize that the force and the electric field are in

  • opposite directions for electrons, but that's a detail,

  • I'm interested in the magnitudes only.

  • And so now these electrons will experience an acceleration,

  • which is the force divided by the mass of the electron,

  • and so they will pick up, eh, speed, between these colli-

  • collisions, which we call the drift velocity,

  • which is A times tau, it's just eight oh one.

  • And so A equals F divided by M. E F is in the A,

  • so we get E times E divided by the mass of the electrons,

  • times tau. And that is the

  • the drift velocity. When the electric field goes

  • up, the drift velocity goes up, so the electrons move faster in

  • the direction opposite to the current.

  • If the time between collisions gets larger, they -- the

  • acceleration lasts longer, so also, they pick up a larger

  • speed, so that's intuitively pleasing.

  • If we take a specific case, and I take, for instance,

  • copper, and I apply over the -- over a

  • wire -- let's say the wire has a length of 10 meters -- I apply a

  • potential difference I call delta V, but I could have said

  • just V -- I apply there a potential difference of ten

  • volts, then the electric field -- inside the conductor,

  • now -- is about one volt per meter.

  • And so I can calculate, now, for that specific case,

  • I can calculate what the drift velocity would be.

  • So the drift velocity of those free electrons would be the

  • charge of the electron, which is one point six times

  • ten to the minus nineteen Coulombs.

  • The E field is one, so I can forget about that.

  • Tau is three times ten to the minus fourteen,

  • as long as I'm room temperature, and the mass of the

  • electron is about ten to the minus thirty kilograms.

  • And so, if I didn't slip up, I found that this is five times

  • ten to the minus three meters per second, which is half a

  • centimeter per second. So imagine, due to the thermal

  • motion, these free electrons move with a million meters per

  • second. But due to this electric field,

  • they only advance along the wire slowly, like a snail,

  • with a speed on average of half a centimeter per second.

  • And that goes very much against your and my own intuition,

  • but this is the way it is. I mean, a turtle would go

  • faster than these electrons. To go along a ten-meter wire

  • would take half hour. Something that you never

  • thought of. That it would take a half hour

  • for these electrons to go along the wire if you apply potential

  • difference of ten volts, copper ten meters long.

  • Now, I want to massage this further,

  • and see whether we can somehow squeeze out Ohm's Law,

  • which is the linear relation between the potential and the

  • current. So let me start off with a wire

  • which has a cross-section A, and it has a length L,

  • and I put a potential difference

  • over the wire, plus here, and minus there,

  • potential V, so I would get a current in

  • this direction, that's our definition of

  • current, going from plus to minus.

  • The electrons, of course, are moving in this

  • direction, with the drift velocity.

  • And so the electric field in here, which is in this

  • direction, that electric field is approximately V divided by L,

  • potential difference divided by distance.

  • In one second, these free electrons will move

  • from left to right over a distance V D meters.

  • So if I make any cross-section through this wire,

  • anywhere, I can calculate how many electrons pass through that

  • cross-section in one second. In one second,

  • the volume that passes through here, the volume is V D times A

  • but the number of free electrons per cubic meter is

  • called N, so this is now the number of free electrons that

  • passes, per second, through any cross-section.

  • And each electron has a charge E, and so this is the current

  • that will flow. The current,

  • of course, is in this direction, but that's a detail.

  • If I now substitute the drift velocity, which we have here,

  • I substitute that in there, but then I find that the

  • current -- I get a E squared, the charge squared,

  • I get N, I get tau, I get downstairs,

  • the mass of the electron, and then I get A times the

  • electric field E. Because I have here,

  • is electric field E. When you look at this here,

  • that really depends only on the properties of by substance,

  • for a given temperature. And we give that a name.

  • We call this sigma, which is called conductivity.

  • Conductivity. If I calculate,

  • for copper, the conductivity, at room temperature,

  • that's very easy, because I've given you what N

  • is, on the blackboard there, ten to the twenty-nine,

  • you know what tau is at room temperature, three times ten to

  • the minus fourteen, so for copper,

  • at room temperature, you will find about ten to the

  • eighth. You will see more values fro

  • sigma later on during this course.

  • This is in SI units. I can massage this a little

  • further, because E is V divided by L,

  • and so I can write now that the current is that sigma times A

  • times V divided by L. I can write it down a little

  • bit differently, I can say V,

  • therefore, equals L divided by sigma A, times I.

  • And now, you're staring at Ohm's Law, whether you like it

  • or not, because this is what we call

  • the resistance, capital R.

  • We often write down rho for one over sigma, and rho is called

  • the resistivity. So either one will do.

  • So you can also write down -- you can write down V equals I R,

  • and this R, then, is either L divided by sigma A,

  • or L times rho -- let me make it a nicer rho -- divided by A.

  • That's the same thing. The units for resistance R is

  • volts per ampere, but we call that ohm.

  • And so the unit for R is ohm. And so if you want to know what

  • the unit for rho and sigma is,

  • that follows immediately from the equations.

  • The unit for rho is then ohm-meters.

  • So we have derived the resistance here in terms of the

  • dimensions -- namely, the length and the

  • cross-section -- but also in terms of the physics on an

  • atomic scale, which, all by itself,

  • is interesting. If you look at the resistance,

  • you see it is proportional with the

  • length of your wire through which you drive a current.

  • Think of this as water trying to go through a pipe.

  • If you make the pipe longer, the resistance goes up,

  • so that's very intuitively pleasing.

  • Notice that you have A downstairs.

  • That means if the pipe is wider, larger cross-section,

  • it's also easier for the current to flow,

  • it's easier for the water to flow.

  • So that's also quite pleasing. Ohm's Law, also,

  • often holds for insulators, which are not conductors,

  • even though I have derived it here for conductors,

  • which have these free electrons.

  • And so now, I want to make a comparison between very good

  • conductors, and very good insulators.

  • So I'll start off with a -- a chunk of material ,

  • cross-sectional area A -- let's take it one millimeter by one

  • millimeter -- so A is ten to the minus six square meters.

  • So here I have a chunk of material, and the length of that

  • material L is one meter. Put a potential difference over

  • there, plus here, and minus here.

  • Current will start to flow in this direction,

  • electrons will flow in this direction.

  • The question now is, what is the resistance of this

  • chunk of material? Well, very easy.

  • You take these equations, you know L and A,

  • so if I tell you what sigma is, then you can immediately

  • calculate what the resistance is.

  • So let's take, first, a good conductor.

  • Silver and gold and copper are very

  • good conductors. They would have values of

  • sigma, ten to the eight, we just calculated for copper,

  • you've seen in front of your own eyes.

  • So that means rho would be ten to the minus eight,

  • it's one over sigma. And so in this particular case,

  • since A is ten to the minus six, the resistance R is simply

  • ten to the sixth times rho.

  • Because L is one meter. So it's very easy -- resistance

  • here, R, is ten to the minus two ohms.

  • One-hundredth of an ohm. For this material if it were

  • copper. Let's now take a very good

  • insulator. Glass is an example.

  • Quartz, porcelain, very good insulators.

  • Now, sigma, the conductivity, is extremely low.

  • They vary somewhere from ten to the minus twelve through ten to

  • the minus sixteen. So rho, now,

  • the resistivity, is something like ten to the

  • twelve to twelve to the plus sixteens, and if I take ten to

  • the fourteen, just I grab -- I have to grab a

  • number -- then you'll find that R, now, is ten to the twenty

  • ohms. A one with twenty zeros.

  • That's an enormous resistance. So you see the difference --

  • twenty-two orders of magnitude difference between a good

  • conductor and a good insulator. And if I make this potential

  • difference over the wire, if I make that one volt,

  • and if I apply Ohm's Law, V equals I R,

  • then I can also calculate the current that is going to flow.

  • If I R is one, then the current here is

  • hundred amperes, and the current here is ten

  • to the minus twenty amperes, an insignificant current,

  • ten to the minus twenty amperes.

  • I first want to demonstrate to you that Ohm's Law sometimes

  • holds, I will do a demonstration,

  • whereby you have a voltage supply -- put a V in here --

  • and we change the voltage in a matter of a few seconds from

  • zero to four volts. This is the plus side,

  • this is the minus side, I have connected it here to a

  • resistor which is fifty ohms -- we use this symbol for a

  • resistor -- and here is a current meter.

  • And the current meter has negligible resistance,

  • so you can ignore that. And I'm going to show you on an

  • oscilloscope -- we've never discussed an oscilloscope,

  • but maybe we will in the future -- I'm going to show you,

  • they are projected -- the voltage unintelligible go from

  • zero to four, versus the current.

  • And so it will start here, and by the time we reach four

  • volts, then we would have reached a current of four

  • divided by fifty, according to Ohm's Law,

  • I will write down just four divided by fifty amperes,

  • which is point oh eight amperes.

  • And if Ohm's Law holds, then you would find a straight

  • line. That's the whole idea about

  • Ohm's Law, that the potential difference, linearly

  • proportional to the current. You double the potential

  • difference, your current doubles.

  • So let's do that, let's take a look at that,

  • you're going to see that there -- and I have to change my

  • lights so that you get a good shot at it

  • -- oh, it's already going. So you see, horizontally,

  • we have the current, and vertically,

  • we have the voltage. And so it takes about a second

  • to go from zero to four -- so this goes from zero to four

  • volts -- and you'll see that the current is beautifully linear.

  • Yes, I'm blocking it -- oh, no, it's my reflection,

  • that's interesting. Ohm's Law doesn't allow for

  • that. So you see how beautifully

  • linear it is. So now, you may have great

  • confidence in Ohm's Law. Don't have any confidence in

  • Ohm's Law. The conductivity sigma is a

  • strong function of the temperature.

  • If you increase the temperature, then the time tau

  • between collisions goes down, because the speed of these free

  • electrons goes up. It's a very strong function

  • of temperature. And so if tau goes down,

  • then clearly, what will happen is that the

  • conductivity will go down. And that means rho will go up.

  • And so you get more resistance. And so when you heat up a

  • substance, the resistance goes up.

  • A higher temperature, higher resistance.

  • So the moment that the resistance R becomes a function

  • of the temperature,

  • I call that a total breakdown of V equals I R,

  • a total breakdown of Ohm's Law. If you look in your book,

  • they say, "Oh, no, no, no, that's not a

  • breakdown. You just have to adjust the re-

  • the resistance for a different temperature." Well,

  • yes, that's an incredible poor man's way of saving a law that

  • is a very bad law. Because the temperature itself

  • is a function of current, the higher the current the

  • higher the temperature. And so now, you get a ratio,

  • V divided by I, which is no longer constant.

  • It becomes a function of the current.

  • That's the end of Ohm's Law. And so I want to show you that

  • if I do the same experiment that I did here, but if I replace

  • this by a light bulb of fifty ohms -- it's a very small light

  • bulb, resistance when it is hot is fifty ohms,

  • when it is cold, it is seven ohms.

  • So R cold of the light bulb is roughly seven ohms,

  • I believe, but I know that when it is hot, it's very close to

  • the fifty ohms. Think it's a little lower.

  • What do you expect now? Well, you expect now,

  • that when the resistance is low in the beginning,

  • you get this, and then when the resistance

  • goes up, you're going to get this.

  • I may end up a little higher current, because I think the

  • resistance is a little lower than fifty ohms.

  • And if you see a curve like this, that's not linear anymore.

  • So that's the end of Ohm's Law. And that's what I want to show

  • you now. So, all I do is,

  • here I have this little light bulb -- for those of you who sit

  • close, they can actually see that light bulb start glowing,

  • but that's not important, I really want you to see that V

  • versus I is no longer linear, there you go.

  • And you see, every time you see this light

  • bulb go on, it heats up, and during the heating up,

  • it, um, the resistance increases.

  • And it's the end of Ohm's Law, for this light bulb,

  • at least. It was fine for the other

  • resistor, but it was not fine for this light bulb.

  • There is another way that I can That is the resistivity,

  • show you that Ohm's Law is not always doing so well.

  • I have a hundred twenty-five volt power supply,

  • so V is hundred and twenty-five volts -- this is the potential

  • difference -- and I have a light bulb, you see it here,

  • that's the light bulb -- the resistance of the light bulb,

  • cold, I believe, is twenty-five ohms,

  • and hot, is about two hundred and fifty ohms.

  • A huge difference. So if the resistance -- if I

  • take the cold resistance, then I would get five amperes,

  • but by the time that the bulb is hot, I would only get half an

  • ampere. It's a huge difference.

  • And what I want to show you, again with the oscilloscope,

  • is the current as a function of time.

  • When you switch on a light bulb, you would expect,

  • if Ohm's Law holds, that when you switch on the

  • current -- or switch on the voltage, I should say -- that

  • you see this. This is then your five amperes.

  • And that it would stay there. That's the whole idea.

  • Namely, that the voltage divided by the current remains a

  • constant. However, what you're going to

  • see is like this. Current goes up,

  • but then the resistance goes down, then the resistance goes

  • up, when the current goes up, the resistance goes up,

  • and then therefore the current will go down,

  • and will level off at a level which is substantially below

  • this. So you're looking there --

  • you're staring at the breakdown of Ohm's Law.

  • And so that's what I want to show you now.

  • So, here we need a hundred and twenty five volts -- and there

  • is the light bulb, and when I throw this switch,

  • you will see the pattern of the current versus time -- you will

  • only see it once, and then we freeze it with the

  • oscilloscope -- turn this off -- so look closely,

  • now. There it is.

  • Forget these little ripple that you see on it,

  • it has to do with the way that we produce the hundred and

  • twenty five volts. And so you see here,

  • horizontally, time, the time between two

  • adjacent vertical lines is twenty milliseconds.

  • And so, indeed, very early on,

  • the current surged toward -- to a very high value,

  • and then the filament heats up, and so the resistance goes up,

  • the light bulb, and the current just goes back

  • again. From the far left to the far

  • right on the screen is about two hundred milliseconds.

  • That's about two tenths of a second.

  • And here you get a current level which is way lower than

  • what you get there. That's a breakdown of Ohm's

  • Law. It is actually very nice that

  • resistances go up with light bulbs

  • when the temperature goes up. Because, suppose it were the

  • other way around. Suppose you turn on a light

  • bulb, and the resistance would go down.

  • Light bulb got hot, resistance goes down,

  • that means the current goes up. Instead of down,

  • the current goes up. That means it gets hotter.

  • That means the resistance goes even further down.

  • That means the current goes even further up.

  • And so what it would mean is that every time you turn on a

  • light bulb, it would, right in front of your eyes,

  • destruct itself. That's not happening.

  • It's the other way around. So, in a way,

  • it's fortunate that the resistance goes up when the

  • light bulbs get hot. All right.

  • Let's now be a little bit more qualitative on some networks of

  • resistors, and we'll have you do a few problems like that,

  • whereby we just will assume, naively, that Ohm's Law holds.

  • In other words, we will always assume that the

  • values for the resistances that we give you will not change.

  • So we will assume that the heat that is produced will not play

  • any important role. So we will just use Ohm's Law,

  • for now, and if you can't use it, we will be very specific

  • about that. So suppose I have here,

  • between point A and point B, suppose I have two resistors,

  • R one and R two. And suppose I apply a potential

  • difference between A and B, that this be plus,

  • and this be minus, and the potential difference is

  • V. And you know V,

  • this is known, I give you V,

  • I gave you this resistance, and I gave you that one.

  • So I could ask you now, what is the current that is

  • going to flow? I could also ask you,

  • then, what is the potential difference over this resistor

  • alone -- which I will call V one -- and

  • what is the potential difference over the second resistor,

  • which I call V two? Very straightforward question.

  • Well, you apply, now, Ohm's Law,

  • and so between A and B, there are two resistors,

  • in series. So the current has to go

  • through both, and so the potential difference

  • V, in Ohm's Law, is now the total current times

  • R one plus R two. Suppose these two resistors

  • were the same, they had the same length,

  • same cross-sectional area. If you put two in series,

  • you have twice the length. Well, so, twice the length,

  • remember, resistance is linearly proportional with the

  • length of a wire, and so you add them up.

  • So now you know R one and you know R two, you know V,

  • so you already know the current, very simple.

  • You can also apply Ohm's Law, as long as it holds,

  • for this resistor alone. So then you get that V one

  • equals I times R one, so now you have the voltage

  • over this resistor, and of course,

  • V two must be the current I times R two.

  • And so you have solved your problem.

  • All the questions that I asked you, you have the answers to.

  • We could now have a slightly different problem,

  • whereby point A is here, but now we have a resistor

  • here, which is R one,

  • and we have here, R two.

  • This is point B, and this is R two.

  • And the potential difference is V, that is, again,

  • given, and now I could ask you, what, now, is the current that

  • will flow here? And then I can also ask you,

  • what is the current that would go through one -- resistor one,

  • and what is the current that could go through

  • resistor two? And I would allow you to use

  • Ohm's Law. So now you say,

  • "Aha! The potential difference from A

  • to B going this route, that potential difference,

  • is V, that's a given." So V must now be I one times R one.

  • That's Ohm's Law, for this upper branch.

  • But, of course, you can also go the lower

  • branch. So the same V is also I two

  • times R two. But whatever current comes in

  • here must split up between these two, think of it as water.

  • You cannot get rid of charges. The number of charges per

  • second that flow into this juncture continue on,

  • and so I, the total current, is I one plus I two.

  • And so now, you see, you have all the

  • ingredients that you need to solve for the current I -- for

  • the current I one, and for the current I two.

  • And you can turn this into an industry, you can make extremely

  • complicated networks of resistors -- and if you were in

  • course six, you should love it -- I don't like it at all,

  • so you don't have to worry about it, you're not going to

  • get very complicated resistor net- networks

  • from me -- but in course six, you're going to see a lot of

  • them. They're going to throw them --

  • stuff them down your throat. The conductivity of a substan-

  • substance goes up if I can increase the number of charge

  • carriers. If we have dry air,

  • and it is cold, then the resistivity of cold,

  • dry air at one atmosphere -- so rho for

  • air, cold, dry, one atmosphere -- cold means

  • temperature that we have outside -- it's about four times ten to

  • the thirteen. That is the resistivity of air.

  • It is about what it is in this room, maybe a little

  • lower, because the temperature is a little higher.

  • If I heat it up -- the air -- then the conductivity will go

  • up. Resistivity will go down,

  • because now, I create oxygen and nitrogen

  • ions by heating up the air. Remember when we had this

  • lightning, the unintelligible came down, and we created a

  • channel full of ions and electrons, that had a very low

  • resistivity, a very high conductivity.

  • And so what I want to demonstrate to you,

  • that when I create ions in this room, that I can actually make

  • the conductivity of air go up tremendously.

  • Not only will the electrons move, but also the ions,

  • now, will start to move. And the way I'm going to do

  • that is, I'm going to put charge on the electroscope -- oh,

  • that is not so good -- no harm done.

  • I'm going to put charge on the electroscope,

  • and you will see that the conductivity of air is so poor

  • that it will stay there for hours.

  • And then what I will do, I will create ions in the

  • vicinity of the electroscope. But let's first put some charge

  • on the electroscope. I have here a glass rod and

  • I'll put some charge on it. OK, that's a lot of charge.

  • And, uh, the r- the air is quite dry, conductivity is very,

  • very small, and so the charge cannot go off through the air to

  • the surroundings, to the earth.

  • But now I'm going to create ions there by heating it up,

  • and I decided to do that with a candle, because a candle is

  • very romantic, as we all know.

  • So here I have this candle -- look how well the charge is

  • holding, eh? -- and here's my candle.

  • And I will bring the candle -- oh, maybe twenty centimeters

  • from the electroscope. Look at it, look at it,

  • already going. It's about fifteen centimeters

  • away. I'll take my candle away,

  • and it stops again. So it's all due to the fact

  • that I'm ionizing the air there, creating free electrons as well

  • as ions, and they both participate now in the current,

  • and the charge can flow away from the electroscope through

  • the earth, because the conductivity now is so much

  • higher. I stop again,

  • and it stops. You see in front of your eyes

  • how important the temperature is, in this case,

  • the presence of the ions in the air.

  • If I have clean, distilled water -- I mean,

  • clean water. I don't mean the stuff that you

  • get in Cambridge, let alone did I mean the stuff

  • that is in the Charles River, I mean clean water,

  • that has a pH of seven. That means one out of ten to

  • the seven of the water molecules is ionized, H plus and O H

  • minus. The conductivity,

  • by the way, is not the result of the

  • free electrons, but is really the result of

  • these H plus and O H minus ions. It's one of the cases whereby

  • not the -- the electrons are maj- the major responsibility

  • for the current. If I have add three percent of

  • salt, in terms of weight, then all that salt will ionize,

  • so you get sodium plus and C L minus ions, you increase the

  • number of ions by an enormous factor.

  • And so the conductivity will soar up

  • by a factor of three hundred thousand, or up to a million,

  • because you increase the ions by that amount.

  • And so it's no surprise then, for you, that the conductivity

  • of seawater is a million times higher -- think about it,

  • a million times higher -- than the conductivity of distilled

  • water. And I would like to give you

  • the number for water -- so this is distilled water --

  • that is about two times ten to the fifth ohm-meters.

  • There is another way that I can That is the resistivity,

  • two times ten to the five oh-meters.

  • I have here, a bucket of distilled water.

  • I'll make a drawing for you on the blackboard there.

  • So here is a bucket of distilled water,

  • and in there, is a copper plate,

  • and another copper plate, and here is a light bulb,

  • and this will go straight to the outlet [wssshhht],

  • stick it in, hundred ten volts.

  • This light bulb has eight hundred ohm resistance when it

  • is hot. You see the light bulb here.

  • You can calculate what this resistance is between the two

  • plates, that's easy, you have all the tools now.

  • If you know the distance, it's about twenty centimeters,

  • and you know the surface area of the plates,

  • because remember, the resistance is inversely

  • proportional with A, so you have to take that into

  • account -- and you take the resistivity of water into

  • account, it's a trivial calculation, you can calculate

  • what the resistance is of this portion here.

  • And I found that this resistance here is about two

  • megaohms. Two million ohms.

  • So, when I plug this into a wall, the current that will flow

  • is extremely low, because it has to go through

  • the eight hundred ohms, and through the two megaohms.

  • So you won't see anything, the light bulb will not show

  • any light.

  • But now, if I -- put salt in here, if I really manage to put

  • three percent in weight salt in here, then this two megaohm will

  • go down to two ohms, a million times less.

  • So now, the light bulb will be happy like a clam at high tide,

  • because two ohms here, plus the eight hundred,

  • the two is insignificant. And this is what I want to --

  • to demonstrate to you now, the

  • enormous importance of increasing ions.

  • I increased ions here by heating the air,

  • now I'm going to increase the ions by adding salt.

  • And so the first thing that I will do is, I will stick this in

  • here. There's the light bulb.

  • And I make a daring prediction that you will see nothing.

  • There we go. Nothing.

  • Isn't that amazing? You didn't expect that,

  • right? Physics works.

  • You see nothing. If I take the plates out,

  • and touch them with each other, what will happen?

  • There you go. But this water has such a huge

  • resistance that the current is too low.

  • Well, let's add some -- not pepper -- add some salt.

  • Yes, there's salt in there. It's about as much as I would

  • put on my eggs in the morning -- stir a little -- ah,

  • hey, look at that. Isn't that amazing?

  • And when I bring them closer together, it will become even

  • brighter, because L is now smaller, the distance is

  • smaller. I bring them farther apart,

  • it's amazing. Just a teeny,

  • weeny little bit of salt, about as much as I use on my

  • egg, let alone -- what the hell, let's put everything in there

  • -- that's a unintelligible I put everything, then,

  • of course, you go almost down to the two ohms,

  • and the light bulb will be just burning normally.

  • But even with that little bit of salt, you saw the huge

  • difference. My body is a fairly good

  • conductor -- yours too, we all came out of the sea --

  • so we are almost all water -- and therefore,

  • when we do experiments with little charge,

  • like the van der Graf, being a student,

  • then we have to insulate ourselves very carefully,

  • putting glass plates under us, or plastic stools,

  • to prevent that the charge runs down to the earth.

  • In fact, the resistance, my resistance between my body

  • and the earth is largely dictated by the soles of my

  • shoe, not by my body,

  • not by my skin. But if you look at my soles,

  • then you get something like this, and it has a certain

  • thickness, and this, maybe one centimeter.

  • This, now, is L in my calculation for the resistance,

  • because current may flow in this direction,

  • so that's L. Well, how large is my foot?

  • Let's say it's one foot long -- no pun implied -- and let's say

  • it's about ten centimeters wide. So you can calculate what the

  • surface area A is, you know what L is,

  • and if you know, now what the resistivity is for

  • my sole, I can make a rough guess, I looked up the material,

  • and I found that the resistivity is about ten to the

  • tenth. So I can now calculate what the

  • resistance is in this direction.

  • And I found that that resistance then,

  • putting in the numbers, is about ten billion ohm.

  • And you will say, "Wow!" Oh, it's four,

  • actually. Well, big deal.

  • Four billion ohm. So you will say,

  • "That's enormous resistance!" Well, first of all,

  • I'm walking on two feet, not on one, so if I would be

  • standing one the whole lecture, it would probably be four

  • billion, but if I have two feet on the ground,

  • it's really two billion, you will say,

  • "Well, that's still extremely large!" Well,

  • it may look large, but it really isn't,

  • because all the experiments that we are doing here in twenty

  • six one hundred, you're dealing with very small

  • amounts of charge. Even if you take the van der

  • Graff -- the van der Graff, say, has two hundred thousand

  • volts -- and let's assume that my resistance is two times ten

  • to the nine ohms, two feet on the ground.

  • So when I touch the van der Graff,

  • the current that would flow, according to Ohm's Law,

  • would be hundred microamperes. That means, in one second,

  • I can take hundred microCoulombs of the van der

  • Graff, but the van der Graff has only ten microCoulombs on in.

  • So the resistance of four billion or two billion ohms is

  • way too low for these experiments that we have been

  • doing in twenty six one hundred, and that's why we use these

  • plastic stools, and we use these glass plates

  • in order to make sure that the current

  • is not draining off the the charge that we need for the

  • experiments. I want to demonstrate that to

  • you, that, indeed, even with my shoes on -- that

  • means, even with my two billion ohm resistance to the ground --

  • that it will be very difficult for me, for instance,

  • to keep charge on an electroscope.

  • I'm going to put charge on this electroscope by scuffing my

  • feet. But, since I keep my -- I have

  • my shoes on, I'm not standing on the glass plate,

  • the charge will flow through me.

  • You can apply Ohm's Law. And you will see that as I do

  • this -- I'm scuffing my feet now -- that I can only keep that

  • electroscope charged as long as I keep scuffing.

  • But the moment that I stop scuffing, it's gone.

  • Start scuffing again, that's fine,

  • but the moment that I stop scuffing,

  • it goes off again. Even though this resistance is

  • something like two billion ohms. Let alone if I take my shoes

  • off. I apologize for that.

  • If now I scuff, I can't even get any charge on

  • the electroscope, because now,

  • the resistance is so ridiculously low,

  • I don't even have the two billion ohms,

  • I can't even put any charge on the electroscope.

  • It's always very difficult for us to

  • do these experiments unless we insulate ourselves very well.

  • And if, somehow, the weather is a little damp,

  • we can very thin films of water onto our tools,

  • and then the current can flow off just through these very thin

  • layers of water. That's why we always like to do

  • these experiments in winter, so that the conductivity of the

  • air is very low, no water anywhere.

  • Here you see a slide of a robbery.

  • I have scuffed my feet across the rug, and I am armed with a

  • static charge. Hand over all your money,

  • or I'll touch your nose. This person either never took

  • eight oh two, or he is wearing very,

  • very special shoes. See you on Wednesday.

When positive charges move in this direction,

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it