let's give ourselves a little quiz.

And what I want you to do is figure out

which of these statements are actually true.

And our first statement is, "If the net force on a body

is zero, its velocity will not change."

Interesting.

Statement number two, "An unbalanced force on a body

will always impact the object's speed."

Also an interesting statement.

Statement number three, "The reason

why initially moving objects tend

to come to rest in our everyday life

is because they are being acted on by unbalanced forces."

And statement four, "An unbalanced force on an object

will always change the object's direction."

So I'll let you think about that.

So let's think about these statement by statement.

So our first statement right over here,

"If the net force on a body is zero,

its velocity will not change."

This is absolutely true.

This is actually even another way

of rephrasing Newton's First Law.

If I have some type of object that's

just traveling through space with some velocity--

so it has some speed going in some direction,

and maybe it's deep space.

And we can just, for purity, assume

that there's no gravitational interactions.

There will always be some minuscule ones,

but we'll assume no gravitational interactions.

Absolutely no particles that it's

bumping into, absolute vacuum of space.

This thing will travel on forever.

Its velocity will not change.

Neither its speed nor its direction will change.

So this one is absolutely true.

Statement number two, "An unbalanced force on a body

will always impact the object's speed."

And the key word right over here is "speed."

If I had written "impact the object's velocity," then

this would be a true statement.

An unbalanced force on a body will always

impact the object's velocity.

That would be true.

But we wrote "speed" here.

Speed is the magnitude of velocity.

It does not take into account the direction.

And to see why this second statement is false,

you could think about a couple of things.

And we'll do more videos on the intuition

of centripetal acceleration and centripetal

forces, inward forces, if this does not

make complete intuitive sense to you just at this moment.

But imagine we're looking at an ice skating rink from above.

And you have an ice skater.

This is the ice skater's head.

And they are traveling in that direction.

Now imagine right at that moment,

they grab a rope that is nailed to a stake in the ice

skating rink right over there.

We're viewing all of this from above, and this right over here

is the rope.

Now what is going to happen?

Well, the skater is going to travel.

Their direction is actually going to change.

And they could hold on to the rope,

and as long as they hold on to the rope,

they'll keep going in circles.

And when they let go of the rope,

they'll start going in whatever direction

they were traveling in when they let go.

They'll keep going on in that direction.

And if we assume very, very, very small frictions

from the ice skating rink, they'll

actually have the same speed.

So the force, the inward force, the tension

from the rope pulling on the skater in this situation,

would have only changed the skater's direction.

So and unbalanced force doesn't necessarily

have to impact the object's speed.

It often does.

But in that situation, it would have only impacted

the skater's direction.

Another situation like this-- and once again,

this involves centripetal acceleration, inward forces,

inward acceleration-- is a satellite in orbit,

or any type of thing in orbit.

So if that is some type of planet,

and this is one of the planet's moons right over here,

the reason why it stays in orbit is because the pull of gravity

keeps making the object change its direction, but not

its speed.

Its speed is the exact right speed.

So this was its speed right here.

If the planet wasn't there, it would just

keep going on in that direction forever and forever.

But the planet right over here, there's

an inward force of gravity.

And we'll talk more about the force of gravity in the future.

But this inward force of gravity is

going to accelerate this object inwards while it travels.

And so after some period of time,

this object's velocity vector-- if you

add the previous velocity with how much it's

changed its new velocity vector.

Now this is after its traveled a little bit-- its new velocity

vector might look something like this.

And it's traveling at the exact right speed

so that the force of gravity is always

at a right angle to its actual trajectory.

It's the exact right speed so it doesn't go off into deep space

and so it doesn't plummet into the earth.

And we'll cover that in much more detail.

But the simple answer is, unbalanced force on a body

will always impact its velocity.

It could be its speed, its direction, or both,

but it doesn't have to be both.

It could be just the speed or just the direction.

So this is an incorrect statement.

Now the third statement, "The reason

why initially moving objects tend

to come to rest in our everyday life

is because they are being acted on by unbalanced forces."

This is absolutely true.

And this is the example we gave.

If I take an object, if I take my book

and I try to slide it across the desk,

the reason why it eventually comes to stop

is because we have the unbalanced force of friction--

the grinding of the surface of the book

with the grinding of the table.

If I'm inside of a pool or even if there's

absolutely no current in the pool,

and if I were to try to push some type of object

inside the water, it eventually comes

to stop because of all of the resistance of the water itself.

It's providing an unbalanced force in a direction

opposite it's motion.

That is what's slowing it down.

So in our everyday life, the reason

why we don't see these things go on and on

forever is that we have these frictions, these air

resistants, or the friction with actual surfaces.

And then the last statement, "An unbalanced force on an object

will always change the object's direction."

Well, this one actually is maybe the most intuitive.

We always have this situation.

Let's say I have a block right over here,

and it's traveling with some velocity in that direction--

five meters per second.

If I apply an unbalanced force in that same direction--

so that's my force right over there.

If I apply it in that same direction,

I'm just going to accelerate it in that same direction.

So I won't necessarily change it.

Even if I were to act against it, I might decelerate it,

but I won't necessarily change its direction.

I could change its direction by doing something like this,

but I don't necessarily.

I'm not always necessarily changing

the object's direction.

So this is not true.

An unbalanced force on an object will not always

change the object's direction.

It can, like these circumstances, but not always.

So "always" is what makes this very, very, very wrong.