Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • So in 1781, an English composer,

  • technologist and astronomer called William Herschel

  • noticed an object on the sky that

  • didn't quite move the way the rest of the stars did.

  • And Herschel's recognition that something was different,

  • that something wasn't quite right,

  • was the discovery of a planet,

  • the planet Uranus,

  • a name that has entertained

  • countless generations of children,

  • but a planet that overnight

  • doubled the size of our known solar system.

  • Just last month, NASA announced the discovery

  • of 517 new planets

  • in orbit around nearby stars,

  • almost doubling overnight the number of planets

  • we know about within our galaxy.

  • So astronomy is constantly being transformed by this

  • capacity to collect data,

  • and with data almost doubling every year,

  • within the next two decades, me may even

  • reach the point for the first time in history

  • where we've discovered the majority of the galaxies

  • within the universe.

  • But as we enter this era of big data,

  • what we're beginning to find is there's a difference

  • between more data being just better

  • and more data being different,

  • capable of changing the questions we want to ask,

  • and this difference is not about how much data we collect,

  • it's whether those data open new windows

  • into our universe,

  • whether they change the way we view the sky.

  • So what is the next window into our universe?

  • What is the next chapter for astronomy?

  • Well, I'm going to show you some of the tools and the technologies

  • that we're going to develop over the next decade,

  • and how these technologies,

  • together with the smart use of data,

  • may once again transform astronomy

  • by opening up a window into our universe,

  • the window of time.

  • Why time? Well, time is about origins,

  • and it's about evolution.

  • The origins of our solar system,

  • how our solar system came into being,

  • is it unusual or special in any way?

  • About the evolution of our universe.

  • Why our universe is continuing to expand,

  • and what is this mysterious dark energy

  • that drives that expansion?

  • But first, I want to show you how technology

  • is going to change the way we view the sky.

  • So imagine if you were sitting

  • in the mountains of northern Chile

  • looking out to the west

  • towards the Pacific Ocean

  • a few hours before sunrise.

  • This is the view of the night sky that you would see,

  • and it's a beautiful view,

  • with the Milky Way just peeking out over the horizon.

  • but it's also a static view,

  • and in many ways, this is the way we think of our universe:

  • eternal and unchanging.

  • But the universe is anything but static.

  • It constantly changes on timescales of seconds

  • to billions of years.

  • Galaxies merge, they collide

  • at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour.

  • Stars are born, they die,

  • they explode in these extravagant displays.

  • In fact, if we could go back

  • to our tranquil skies above Chile,

  • and we allow time to move forward

  • to see how the sky might change over the next year,

  • the pulsations that you see

  • are supernovae, the final remnants of a dying star

  • exploding, brightening and then fading from view,

  • each one of these supernovae

  • five billion times the brightness of our sun,

  • so we can see them to great distances

  • but only for a short amount of time.

  • Ten supernova per second explode somewhere

  • in our universe.

  • If we could hear it,

  • it would be popping like a bag of popcorn.

  • Now, if we fade out the supernovae,

  • it's not just brightness that changes.

  • Our sky is in constant motion.

  • This swarm of objects you see streaming across the sky

  • are asteroids as they orbit our sun,

  • and it's these changes and the motion

  • and it's the dynamics of the system

  • that allow us to build our models for our universe,

  • to predict its future and to explain its past.

  • But the telescopes we've used over the last decade

  • are not designed to capture the data at this scale.

  • The Hubble Space Telescope:

  • for the last 25 years it's been producing

  • some of the most detailed views

  • of our distant universe,

  • but if you tried to use the Hubble to create an image

  • of the sky, it would take 13 million individual images,

  • about 120 years to do this just once.

  • So this is driving us to new technologies

  • and new telescopes,

  • telescopes that can go faint

  • to look at the distant universe

  • but also telescopes that can go wide

  • to capture the sky as rapidly as possible,

  • telescopes like the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope,

  • or the LSST,

  • possibly the most boring name ever

  • for one of the most fascinating experiments

  • in the history of astronomy,

  • in fact proof, if you should need it,

  • that you should never allow a scientist or an engineer

  • to name anything, not even your children. (Laughter)

  • We're building the LSST.

  • We expect it to start taking data by the end of this decade.

  • I'm going to show you how we think

  • it's going to transform our views of the universe,

  • because one image from the LSST

  • is equivalent to 3,000 images

  • from the Hubble Space Telescope,

  • each image three and a half degrees on the sky,

  • seven times the width of the full moon.

  • Well, how do you capture an image at this scale?

  • Well, you build the largest digital camera in history,

  • using the same technology you find in the cameras in your cell phone

  • or in the digital cameras you can buy in the High Street,

  • but now at a scale that is five and a half feet across,

  • about the size of a Volkswagen Beetle,

  • where one image is three billion pixels.

  • So if you wanted to look at an image

  • in its full resolution, just a single LSST image,

  • it would take about 1,500 high-definition TV screens.

  • And this camera will image the sky,

  • taking a new picture every 20 seconds,

  • constantly scanning the sky

  • so every three nights, we'll get a completely new view

  • of the skies above Chile.

  • Over the mission lifetime of this telescope,

  • it will detect 40 billion stars and galaxies,

  • and that will be for the first time

  • we'll have detected more objects in our universe

  • than people on the Earth.

  • Now, we can talk about this

  • in terms of terabytes and petabytes

  • and billions of objects,

  • but a way to get a sense of the amount of data

  • that will come off this camera

  • is that it's like playing every TED Talk ever recorded

  • simultaneously, 24 hours a day,

  • seven days a week, for 10 years.

  • And to process this data means

  • searching through all of those talks

  • for every new idea and every new concept,

  • looking at each part of the video

  • to see how one frame may have changed

  • from the next.

  • And this is changing the way that we do science,

  • changing the way that we do astronomy,

  • to a place where software and algorithms

  • have to mine through this data,

  • where the software is as critical to the science

  • as the telescopes and the cameras that we've built.

  • Now, thousands of discoveries

  • will come from this project,

  • but I'm just going to tell you about two

  • of the ideas about origins and evolution

  • that may be transformed by our access

  • to data at this scale.

  • In the last five years, NASA has discovered

  • over 1,000 planetary systems

  • around nearby stars,

  • but the systems we're finding

  • aren't much like our own solar system,

  • and one of the questions we face is

  • is it just that we haven't been looking hard enough

  • or is there something special or unusual

  • about how our solar system formed?

  • And if we want to answer that question,

  • we have to know and understand

  • the history of our solar system in detail,

  • and it's the details that are crucial.

  • So now, if we look back at the sky,

  • at our asteroids that were streaming across the sky,

  • these asteroids are like the debris of our solar system.

  • The positions of the asteroids

  • are like a fingerprint of an earlier time

  • when the orbits of Neptune and Jupiter

  • were much closer to the sun,

  • and as these giant planets migrated through our solar system,

  • they were scattering the asteroids in their wake.

  • So studying the asteroids

  • is like performing forensics,

  • performing forensics on our solar system,

  • but to do this, we need distance,

  • and we get the distance from the motion,

  • and we get the motion because of our access to time.

  • So what does this tell us?

  • Well, if you look at the little yellow asteroids

  • flitting across the screen,

  • these are the asteroids that are moving fastest,

  • because they're closest to us, closest to Earth.

  • These are the asteroids we may one day

  • send spacecraft to, to mine them for minerals,

  • but they're also the asteroids that may one day

  • impact the Earth,

  • like happened 60 million years ago

  • with the extinction of the dinosaurs,

  • or just at the beginning of the last century,

  • when an asteroid wiped out

  • almost 1,000 square miles of Siberian forest,

  • or even just last year, as one burnt up over Russia,

  • releasing the energy of a small nuclear bomb.

  • So studying the forensics of our solar system

  • doesn't just tell us about the past,

  • it can also predict the future, including our future.

  • Now when we get distance,

  • we get to see the asteroids in their natural habitat,

  • in orbit around the sun.

  • So every point in this visualization that you can see

  • is a real asteroid.

  • Its orbit has been calculated from its motion across the sky.

  • The colors reflect the composition of these asteroids,

  • dry and stony in the center,

  • water-rich and primitive towards the edge,

  • water-rich asteroids which may have seeded

  • the oceans and the seas that we find on our planet

  • when they bombarded the Earth at an earlier time.

  • Because the LSST will be able to go faint

  • and not just wide,

  • we will be able to see these asteroids

  • far beyond the inner part of our solar system,

  • to asteroids beyond the orbits of Neptune and Mars,

  • to comets and asteroids that may exist

  • almost a light year from our sun.

  • And as we increase the detail of this picture,

  • increasing the detail by factors of 10 to 100,

  • we will be able to answer questions such as,

  • is there evidence for planets outside the orbit of Neptune,

  • to find Earth-impacting asteroids

  • long before they're a danger,

  • and to find out whether, maybe,

  • our sun formed on its own or in a cluster of stars,

  • and maybe it's this sun's stellar siblings

  • that influenced the formation of our solar system,

  • and maybe that's one of the reasons why solar systems like ours seem to be so rare.

  • Now, distance and changes in our universe

  • distance equates to time,

  • as well as changes on the sky.

  • Every foot of distance you look away,

  • or every foot of distance an object is away,

  • you're looking back about a billionth of a second in time,

  • and this idea or this notion of looking back in time

  • has revolutionized our ideas about the universe,

  • not once but multiple times.

  • The first time was in 1929,

  • when an astronomer called Edwin Hubble

  • showed that the universe was expanding,

  • leading to the ideas of the Big Bang.

  • And the observations were simple:

  • just 24 galaxies

  • and a hand-drawn picture.

  • But just the idea that the more distant a galaxy,

  • the faster it was receding,

  • was enough to give rise to modern cosmology.

  • A second revolution happened 70 years later,

  • when two groups of astronomers showed

  • that the universe wasn't just expanding,

  • it was accelerating,

  • a surprise like throwing up a ball into the sky

  • and finding out the higher that it gets,

  • the faster it moves away.

  • And they showed this

  • by measuring the brightness of supernovae,

  • and how the brightness of the supernovae

  • got fainter with distance.

  • And these observations were more complex.

  • They required new technologies and new telescopes,

  • because the supernovae were in galaxies

  • that were 2,000 times more distant

  • than the ones used by Hubble.

  • And it took three years to find just 42 supernovae,

  • because a supernova only explodes

  • once every hundred years within a galaxy.

  • Three years to find 42 supernovae

  • by searching through tens of thousands of galaxies.

  • And once they'd collected their data,

  • this is what they found.

  • Now, this may not look impressive,

  • but this is what a revolution in physics looks like:

  • a line predicting the brightness of a supernova

  • 11 billion light years away,

  • and a handful of points that don't quite fit that line.

  • Small changes give rise to big consequences.

  • Small changes allow us to make discoveries,

  • like the planet found by Herschel.

  • Small changes turn our understanding

  • of the universe on its head.

  • So 42 supernovae, slightly too faint,

  • meaning slightly further away,

  • requiring that a universe must not just be expanding,

  • but this expansion must be accelerating,

  • revealing a component of our universe

  • which we now call dark energy,

  • a component that drives this expansion

  • and makes up 68 percent of the energy budget

  • of our universe today.

  • So what is the next revolution likely to be?

  • Well, what is dark energy and why does it exist?

  • Each of these lines shows a different model

  • for what dark energy might be,

  • showing the properties of dark energy.

  • They all are consistent with the 42 points,

  • but the ideas behind these lines

  • are dramatically different.

  • Some people think about a dark energy

  • that changes with time,

  • or whether the properties of the dark energy

  • are different depending on where you look on the sky.

  • Others make differences and changes

  • to the physics at the sub-atomic level.

  • Or, they look at large scales

  • and change how gravity and general relativity work,

  • or they say our universe is just one of many,

  • part of this mysterious multiverse,

  • but all of these ideas, all of these theories,

  • amazing and admittedly some of them a little crazy,

  • but all of them consistent with our 42 points.

  • So how can we hope to make sense of this

  • over the next decade?

  • Well, imagine if I gave you a pair of dice,

  • and I said you wanted to see whether those dice

  • were loaded or fair.

  • One roll of the dice would tell you very little,

  • but the more times you rolled them,

  • the more data you collected,

  • the more confident you would become,

  • not just whether they're loaded or fair,

  • but by how much, and in what way.

  • It took three years to find just 42 supernovae

  • because the telescopes that we built

  • could only survey a small part of the sky.

  • With the LSST, we get a completely new view

  • of the skies above Chile every three nights.

  • In its first night of operation,

  • it will find 10 times the number of supernovae

  • used in the discovery of dark energy.

  • This will increase by 1,000

  • within the first four months:

  • 1.5 million supernovae by the end of its survey,

  • each supernova a roll of the dice,

  • each supernova testing which theories of dark energy

  • are consistent, and which ones are not.

  • And so, by combining these supernova data

  • with other measures of cosmology,

  • we'll progressively rule out the different ideas

  • and theories of dark energy

  • until hopefully at the end of this survey around 2030,

  • we would expect to hopefully see

  • a theory for our universe,

  • a fundamental theory for the physics of our universe,

  • to gradually emerge.

  • Now, in many ways, the questions that I posed

  • are in reality the simplest of questions.

  • We may not know the answers,

  • but we at least know how to ask the questions.

  • But if looking through tens of thousands of galaxies

  • revealed 42 supernovae that turned

  • our understanding of the universe on its head,

  • when we're working with billions of galaxies,

  • how many more times are we going to find

  • 42 points that don't quite match what we expect?

  • Like the planet found by Herschel

  • or dark energy

  • or quantum mechanics or general relativity,

  • all ideas that came because the data

  • didn't quite match what we expected.

  • What's so exciting about the next decade of data

  • in astronomy is,

  • we don't even know how many answers

  • are out there waiting,

  • answers about our origins and our evolution.

  • How many answers are out there

  • that we don't even know the questions

  • that we want to ask?

  • Thank you.

  • (Applause)

So in 1781, an English composer,

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it