where we look at bits of scientific theory that have wiggled their way into popular culture

and have taken on a life of their own.

Today we're talking about Schrodinger's cat; A famous thought experiment devised by

the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrodinger who helped piece physics back together

after Einstein and his crew blew a giant freaking hole in it back in the early 20th century

Sorry to overstate how much of a giant crap circus the nineteen twenties were for physicists.

Until then everything had pretty much just been good old fashion Newtonian Physics

where you could observe objects moving and predict to how they react to various forces.

But then along comes all this new research into subatomic particles

that shows that they dont act predictably at all!

In fact, sometimes stuff seems to be two different things at once like an electron and

a beam might act like a particle sometimes and like a wave at other times.

And to make things even more... GAA! --

The more you try to observe and measure these particles, the less naturally they behave.

Say what now?!

My friends, I shall now introduce you to one of the biggest mind-flogs of quantum mechanics.

It's called, Superposition.

The idea that a particle can exist in all of its theoretically possible states at the same time.

So Schrodinger came up with this thought experiment to help everybody understand it.

So you have a cat, and you put the cat into a steel chamber for an hour

with a vial of deadly gas, a Geiger counter, a hammer, and a tiny bit of something radioactive.

Bear with me here.

Now say that there's a fifty-fifty chance that one of the radioactive atoms is going to decay

and release some radiation within that hour.

If one of the atoms decays, the Geiger counter is going to trigger the hammer,

shattering the vial of poisonous gas. Really Schrodinger?

This is not the best way to get people behind the idea of funding the sciences.

So, there is a fifty percent chance that at the end of the hour that vial has been broken and the cat is dead

and an equally good chance that the vial hasn't been broken

and the cat's just kickin' it wondering 'What's for supper?'

But, what's actually happening in the box?

According to quantum mechanics, any one of those radioactive atoms would be in a superposition

of being both decayed and not decayed at the same time.

Because that's how quantum objects act.

So then, that decayed atom will have both killed and not killed the cat, right?

Well that's the logical conclusion but a cat... a cat isn't a quantum object.

A cat is a big, normal thing that obeys nice, old-fashioned Newtonian Laws

so it, just like every other cat in history, is EITHER alive OR dead.

Schrodinger's point, at least one of them,

is that the two objects are subject to two separate sets of laws that can't be reconciled.

In order to know whether the atom has decayed or not and whether the cat is dead or not

you have to open the box and see. But in quantum mechanics, the state of superposition can't be observed.

So, when the evil mad scientist finally opens the chamber to observe

the superposition collapses and the outcome is ensured.

Today, Schrodinger's cat is often talked about as some kind of undead zombie cat

or discussed as if the cat is actually both alive and dead in the box.

But Schrodinger's point wasn't to prove that you can make a cat be both alive and dead,

but instead to prove that the quantum world

doesn't mesh together well with the, you know, like, normal world.

And alternatively the point is that the universe is pretty frickin' weird.

There are other interpretations of quantum mechanics that might resolve the paradox

but none of them are particularly easy to test.

My favorite, of course, is the many worlds interpretation that states that at the end of the experiment,

and at the end of every superposition, new alternate universes are created!

In this case, one in which that cat is alive and one in which the cat is dead.

And to be clear, I don't like this interpretation because I think it's the most likely one

I like it because I think it's such an excellent plot device for science fiction novels.

If you have any questions, and I'm sure you do,

ask them in the comments below and I'll, you know, do my best.

Also, if you have an idea for "I Don't Think That Means What You Think It Means"

please let us know about that too.