Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Translator: Timothy Covell Reviewer: Morton Bast

    譯者: Zheng Song 審譯者: Ren Wan

  • All right. So, like all good stories,

    好吧,就像那些童話故事一樣,

  • this starts a long, long time ago

    這個故事要從很久很久以前講起,

  • when there was basically nothing.

    當時宇宙基本上是一片空白

  • So here is a complete picture of the universe

    這張圖片展現的就是

  • about 14-odd billion years ago.

    140多億年前的整個宇宙

  • All energy is concentrated into a single point of energy.

    所有的能量都集中在一個能量點

  • For some reason it explodes,

    由於某種原因它爆炸了

  • and you begin to get these things.

    宇宙裏開始出現這些東西

  • So you're now about 14 billion years into this.

    它們已經存在了140多億年

  • And these things expand and expand and expand

    而且在不斷地擴大、擴大、擴大

  • into these giant galaxies,

    形成了這些巨大的星系

  • and you get trillions of them.

    數量達到幾萬億

  • And within these galaxies

    在這些星系裏

  • you get these enormous dust clouds.

    出現大量的塵埃雲

  • And I want you to pay particular attention

    請大家注意看

  • to the three little prongs

    圖片中心的

  • in the center of this picture.

    這三個小突起

  • If you take a close-up of those,

    如果給它們來個特寫的話

  • they look like this.

    它們看上去就是這個樣子

  • And what you're looking at is columns of dust

    大家所看到的是塵埃柱

  • where there's so much dust --

    其中滿是塵埃

  • by the way, the scale of this is a trillion vertical miles --

    順便提一句,它的規模有一萬億英里

  • and what's happening is there's so much dust,

    這些大量的塵埃

  • it comes together and it fuses

    相互聚集,熔合

  • and ignites a thermonuclear reaction.

    引發了熱核反應

  • And so what you're watching

    現在大家所看到的

  • is the birth of stars.

    便是恒星的誕生

  • These are stars being born out of here.

    恒星就是在這裏產生的

  • When enough stars come out,

    當恒星的數量足夠多時

  • they create a galaxy.

    它們形成了一個星系

  • This one happens to be a particularly important galaxy,

    而這個星系恰巧是至關重要的

  • because you are here.

    因為我們大家就生活在這裏

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • And as you take a close-up of this galaxy,

    仔細觀察這個星系

  • you find a relatively normal,

    我們會發現一個比較平凡

  • not particularly interesting star.

    並不引人注目的恒星

  • By the way, you're now about two-thirds of the way into this story.

    順便提一句,這個故事已經講了三分之二了

  • So this star doesn't even appear

    而這顆恒星

  • until about two-thirds of the way into this story.

    卻直到現在才出現

  • And then what happens

    現在的情況是

  • is there's enough dust left over

    由於剩餘的塵埃

  • that it doesn't ignite into a star,

    不足以引發熱核反應形成恒星

  • it becomes a planet.

    於是它成為了行星

  • And this is about a little over four billion years ago.

    這大約發生在40億年前

  • And soon thereafter

    不久之後

  • there's enough material left over

    由於擁有足夠的剩餘原料

  • that you get a primordial soup,

    便有了一鍋「原湯」

  • and that creates life.

    生命便從這裏起源

  • And life starts to expand and expand and expand,

    而且不斷地擴大、擴大、再擴大

  • until it goes kaput.

    直到它塵歸塵,土歸土

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • Now the really strange thing

    有件事情非常的奇怪

  • is life goes kaput, not once, not twice,

    生命滅絕了不止一次、兩次

  • but five times.

    而是五次

  • So almost all life on Earth

    幾乎地球上的所有生命

  • is wiped out about five times.

    都被消滅了五次

  • And as you're thinking about that,

    正如大家所想的一樣

  • what happens is you get more and more complexity,

    新生命變得越來越複雜

  • more and more stuff

    越來越多的材質

  • to build new things with.

    包含在裏面

  • And we don't appear

    而我們人類

  • until about 99.96 percent of the time into this story,

    直到這個故事的99.96%才出現

  • just to put ourselves and our ancestors in perspective.

    以便我們正確看待自己和我們的祖先

  • So within that context, there's two theories of the case

    在這個背景下有兩種理論

  • as to why we're all here.

    來解釋人類為什麼存在

  • The first theory of the case

    第一種理論

  • is that's all she wrote.

    這都是她寫下來的

  • Under that theory,

    按照這種理論

  • we are the be-all and end-all

    人類是造物主

  • of all creation.

    最重要的創造

  • And the reason for trillions of galaxies,

    所以數萬億的星系

  • sextillions of planets,

    以及數量眾多的行星存在的原因

  • is to create something that looks like that

    是為了創造這樣…

  • and something that looks like that.

    和那樣的生命體

  • And that's the purpose of the universe;

    這就是宇宙存在的目的

  • and then it flat-lines,

    然後它就開始走平穩路線

  • it doesn't get any better.

    沒有再進一步提高水準

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • The only question you might want to ask yourself is,

    大家可能想問自己

  • could that be just mildly arrogant?

    這樣的解釋是不是有些妄自尊大呢?

  • And if it is --

    如果是這樣的話

  • and particularly given the fact that we came very close to extinction.

    特別是鑒於人類曾經接近滅絕的事實

  • There were only about 2,000 of our species left.

    當時只剩下大約二千人

  • A few more weeks without rain,

    要是再有幾個星期不下雨

  • we would have never seen any of these.

    我們就再也見不到這些名人了

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • (Applause)

    (掌聲)

  • So maybe you have to think about a second theory

    因此我們也許不得不考慮另一種理論

  • if the first one isn't good enough.

    如果第一種解釋不通的話

  • Second theory is: Could we upgrade?

    第二種理論是:我們能不能「升級」?

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • Well, why would one ask a question like that?

    怎麼會有人問出這樣的問題呢?

  • Because there have been at least 29 upgrades so far

    因為目前為止一經發現

  • of humanoids.

    人類已至少「升級」了29次

  • So it turns out that we have upgraded.

    結果表明我們確實「升級」了

  • We've upgraded time and again and again.

    人類一次一次地「升級」

  • And it turns out that we keep discovering upgrades.

    而且我們還在不斷地發現新的「升級」的證據

  • We found this one last year.

    這是去年發現的

  • We found another one last month.

    我們上個月還發現了一個

  • And as you're thinking about this,

    現在大家都在思考這個理論

  • you might also ask the question:

    可能會產生這個疑問

  • So why a single human species?

    為什麼僅僅是人類呢?

  • Wouldn't it be really odd

    如果我們在非洲、亞洲、南極洲

  • if you went to Africa and Asia and Antarctica

    發現同一種鳥類

  • and found exactly the same bird --

    會不會是件很稀奇的事情?

  • particularly given that we co-existed at the same time

    特別是考慮到我們曾經

  • with at least eight other versions of humanoid

    和至少其他八類人種

  • at the same time on this planet?

    在這個星球上共同存在過

  • So the normal state of affairs

    智人是唯一存在的人種這種說法

  • is not to have just a Homo sapiens;

    不是自然界的普遍法則

  • the normal state of affairs

    自然界的普遍法則是

  • is to have various versions of humans walking around.

    各種不同種類的人

  • And if that is the normal state of affairs,

    如果自然界的法則是這樣

  • then you might ask yourself,

    那麼你可能要問自己

  • all right, so if we want to create something else,

    如果我們想創造出其他的人種

  • how big does a mutation have to be?

    要產生多大的變異才可以?

  • Well Svante Paabo has the answer.

    Svante Paabo 給出了答案

  • The difference between humans and Neanderthal

    人類和尼安德塔人(遠古的人種)

  • is 0.004 percent of gene code.

    基因上只有0.004%的差別

  • That's how big the difference is

    一個人種和另一個人種

  • one species to another.

    就是這麼一點差別

  • This explains most contemporary political debates.

    這就解釋了現在多數的政治糾紛

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • But as you're thinking about this,

    大家仔細想一想

  • one of the interesting things

    一件非常有意思的事情

  • is how small these mutations are and where they take place.

    這些變異有多麼微妙?又是在哪發生的?

  • Difference human/Neanderthal

    人類和尼安德塔人的不同在於

  • is sperm and testis,

    精子與睪丸

  • smell and skin.

    氣味與皮膚

  • And those are the specific genes

    這些特殊的基因

  • that differ from one to the other.

    產生了人與人的區別

  • So very small changes can have a big impact.

    因此一點小小的變化就能產生很大的影響

  • And as you're thinking about this,

    大家想想

  • we're continuing to mutate.

    我們一直在變異

  • So about 10,000 years ago by the Black Sea,

    在大約一萬年前的黑海

  • we had one mutation in one gene

    人類的一個基因產生了變異

  • which led to blue eyes.

    因此出現了藍色的眼睛

  • And this is continuing and continuing and continuing.

    這樣的變異一直持續著、持續著

  • And as it continues,

    與此同時

  • one of the things that's going to happen this year

    一件大事將在今年發生

  • is we're going to discover the first 10,000 human genomes,

    我們將發現前一萬個人類基因組

  • because it's gotten cheap enough to do the gene sequencing.

    這得益於基因序列研究已經不那麼昂貴了

  • And when we find these,

    當我們發現這些基因之後

  • we may find differences.

    我們會找到一些不同以往的理論

  • And by the way, this is not a debate that we're ready for,

    順便說一句,我們沒有準備好爭論這個問題

  • because we have really misused the science in this.

    因為我們在這個問題上誤用了科學

  • In the 1920s, we thought there were major differences between people.

    在1920年代,我們曾認為不同人之間的基因有很大差別

  • That was partly based on Francis Galton's work.

    這是部分基於法蘭西斯•高爾頓的研究

  • He was Darwin's cousin.

    他是達爾文的表弟

  • But the U.S., the Carnegie Institute,

    在美國,卡內基研究所

  • Stanford, American Neurological Association

    史丹佛,美國神經病學協會

  • took this really far.

    把這種研究進一步深入

  • That got exported and was really misused.

    進而傳播到其他地方被錯誤地使用

  • In fact, it led to some absolutely horrendous

    事實上它對人類平等待遇

  • treatment of human beings.

    造成了非常可怕的後果

  • So since the 1940s, we've been saying there are no differences,

    所以自1940年代,我們一直在說我們沒有差別

  • we're all identical.

    大家都是一樣的

  • We're going to know at year end if that is true.

    今年年底我們將知道這是不是真的

  • And as we think about that,

    現在大家想想

  • we're actually beginning to find things

    事實上,我們開始發現一些東西

  • like, do you have an ACE gene?

    比如,你有ACE基因嗎?

  • Why would that matter?

    它有什麼重要的呢?

  • Because nobody's ever climbed an 8,000-meter peak without oxygen

    因為沒有一個不帶氧氣能爬上8000米高的山峰的人

  • that doesn't have an ACE gene.

    是不攜帶ACE基因的

  • And if you want to get more specific,

    如果你想瞭解得更具體

  • how about a 577R genotype?

    來看看577R基因型怎麼樣?

  • Well it turns out that every male Olympic power athelete ever tested

    結果表明每個接受檢測的奧運男運動員

  • carries at least one of these variants.

    都攜帶這種基因型的至少一種變體

  • If that is true,

    如果這是真的

  • it leads to some very complicated questions

    那麼就有一些很複雜的問題

  • for the London Olympics.

    留給倫敦奧運會

  • Three options:

    三個問題

  • Do you want the Olympics to be a showcase

    我們希望奧運會成為

  • for really hardworking mutants?

    刻苦訓練的、擁有突變基因的運動員展示的舞臺嗎?

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • Option number two:

    第二

  • Why don't we play it like golf or sailing?

    為什麼我們不像高爾夫球或者帆船運動那樣比賽呢?

  • Because you have one and you don't have one,

    因為你有這個基因、而你沒有

  • I'll give you a tenth of a second head start.

    我會讓你搶佔十分之一秒的優勢

  • Version number three:

    第三

  • Because this is a naturally occurring gene

    因為這是自然形成的基因

  • and you've got it and you didn't pick the right parents,

    你有幸的到了這個基因、而你卻投錯了胎

  • you get the right to upgrade.

    所以你可以晉級

  • Three different options.

    三種不同的選擇

  • If these differences are the difference

    如果這些差別就是

  • between an Olympic medal and a non-Olympic medal.

    奧運獎牌和非奧運獎牌的差別

  • And it turns out that as we discover these things,

    就像我們所發現的一樣

  • we human beings really like to change

    人類非常願意改變

  • how we look, how we act,

    自己的容貌、 行為方式

  • what our bodies do.

    以及身體狀況

  • And we had about 10.2 million plastic surgeries in the United States,

    在美國有過大約1020萬例整形外科手術

  • except that with the technologies that are coming online today,

    除了那些即將上線的新技術

  • today's corrections, deletions,

    現如今修復、去除

  • augmentations and enhancements

    豐胸、美容

  • are going to seem like child's play.

    看起來如同兒戲一般

  • You already saw the work by Tony Atala on TED,

    我們在TED上看過 Tony Atala 的研究

  • but this ability to start filling

    這種填充東西的技術

  • things like inkjet cartridges with cells

    就像是裝滿細胞的噴墨水匣一樣

  • are allowing us to print skin, organs

    讓我們能隨心所欲的 “列印” 皮膚、器官

  • and a whole series of other body parts.

    以及一系列身體部位

  • And as these technologies go forward,

    隨著這些技術的進步

  • you keep seeing this, you keep seeing this, you keep seeing things --

    我們會不斷看到這個,我們會不斷看到這個,我們會不斷看到新東西

  • 2000, human genome sequence --

    2000年,人類基因組序列

  • and it seems like nothing's happening,

    事情就好像是直到該發生的時候

  • until it does.

    才會發生

  • And we may just be in some of these weeks.

    我們也許就處在發生重大變革的這幾個星期內

  • And as you're thinking about

    我們知道

  • these two guys sequencing a human genome in 2000

    這兩位在2000年研究人類基因序列

  • and the Public Project sequencing the human genome in 2000,

    還有2000年的人類基因序列公開專案

  • then you don't hear a lot,

    然後就沒有太多這方面的消息了

  • until you hear about an experiment last year in China,

    直到大家聽說在中國的一次實驗

  • where they take skin cells from this mouse,

    他們從老鼠身上取出皮膚細胞

  • put four chemicals on it,

    在上面注入四種化學藥劑

  • turn those skin cells into stem cells,

    把皮膚細胞轉變成幹細胞

  • let the stem cells grow

    讓這些幹細胞生長

  • and create a full copy of that mouse.

    然後完全“複製”了那只老鼠

  • That's a big deal.

    這是很了不起的

  • Because in essence

    因為從本質上講

  • what it means is you can take a cell,

    這就意味著我們可以拿一個

  • which is a pluripotent stem cell,

    多能幹細胞

  • which is like a skier at the top of a mountain,

    它們就像山頂上的滑雪者

  • and those two skiers become two pluripotent stem cells,

    兩個滑雪者就是兩個多功能幹細胞

  • four, eight, 16,

    分裂成四個、八個、十六個

  • and then it gets so crowded

    然後就變得越來越擁擠

  • after 16 divisions

    十六次分裂之後

  • that those cells have to differentiate.

    這些細胞不得不變異

  • So they go down one side of the mountain,

    所以他們從山的一面走下來

  • they go down another.

    他們從另一面走下來

  • And as they pick that,

    當他們選擇了這條路

  • these become bone,

    就變成了骨骼

  • and then they pick another road and these become platelets,

    那些選擇另一條路的變成了血小板

  • and these become macrophages,

    這些變成了巨噬細胞

  • and these become T cells.

    這些變成了T細胞

  • But it's really hard, once you ski down,

    可是一旦你滑下去

  • to get back up.

    就很難再回頭了

  • Unless, of course, if you have a ski lift.

    當然啦,除非你有滑雪纜車

  • And what those four chemicals do

    那四種化學藥劑的作用

  • is they take any cell

    就是載著細胞

  • and take it way back up the mountain

    回到山頂上

  • so it can become any body part.

    讓它們具有變成身體任何部分的能力

  • And as you think of that,

    正如大家所想的

  • what it means is potentially

    這就意味著

  • you can rebuild a full copy

    我們很有可能

  • of any organism

    只用一個細胞

  • out of any one of its cells.

    複製任何器官

  • That turns out to be a big deal

    這是一個重大突破

  • because now you can take, not just mouse cells,

    因為現在不僅是老鼠細胞

  • but you can human skin cells

    我們可以把人類的皮膚細胞

  • and turn them into human stem cells.

    變成幹細胞

  • And then what they did in October

    就在10月份

  • is they took skin cells, turned them into stem cells

    他們把皮膚細胞變成了幹細胞

  • and began to turn them into liver cells.

    然後開始把它們變成肝臟細胞

  • So in theory,

    所以理論上講

  • you could grow any organ from any one of your cells.

    我們的任何一個細胞可以被培養成任何一個器官

  • Here's a second experiment:

    這是第二個實驗

  • If you could photocopy your body,

    如果我們能給身體做個影印件

  • maybe you also want to take your mind.

    或許也想給思想做一個

  • And one of the things you saw at TED

    大約一年半之前

  • about a year and a half ago

    大家在TED

  • was this guy.

    見過這個傢伙

  • And he gave a wonderful technical talk.

    他做了很精彩的技術演講

  • He's a professor at MIT.

    他是MIT的教授

  • But in essence what he said

    但本質上,他說的是

  • is you can take retroviruses,

    利用逆轉錄病毒

  • which get inside brain cells of mice.

    讓它們進入老鼠的腦細胞

  • You can tag them with proteins

    並用蛋白質標記它們

  • that light up when you light them.

    這種蛋白質在被照亮時會發光

  • And you can map the exact pathways

    當老鼠看到、感覺到、觸摸到東西

  • when a mouse sees, feels, touches,

    回憶、戀愛的時候

  • remembers, loves.

    我們能夠準確描繪出腦部活動路徑

  • And then you can take a fiber optic cable

    我們可以用光纖電纜

  • and light up some of the same things.

    點亮這些相同的東西

  • And by the way, as you do this,

    我們在做這件事情的時候

  • you can image it in two colors,

    可以把它們製成兩種顏色

  • which means you can download this information

    這意味著我們可以把這些資訊

  • as binary code directly into a computer.

    像二進位碼一樣下載到電腦上

  • So what's the bottom line on that?

    這件事情本質上是什麼呢?

  • Well it's not completely inconceivable

    不難想像

  • that someday you'll be able to download your own memories,

    也許有一天我們可以把自己的記憶

  • maybe into a new body.

    下載到一個新的軀體裏

  • And maybe you can upload other people's memories as well.

    或許也可以把別人的記憶載入到自己身上

  • And this might have just one or two

    估計這只會引起一兩個

  • small ethical, political, moral implications.

    小小的政治上、道德上的問題

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • Just a thought.

    隨便想想而已

  • Here's the kind of questions

    有一些問題

  • that are becoming interesting questions

    正在逐漸引起

  • for philosophers, for governing people,

    哲學家、管理者

  • for economists, for scientists.

    經濟學家、科學家的興趣

  • Because these technologies are moving really quickly.

    因為這些技術傳播的非常快

  • And as you think about it,

    大家意猶未盡

  • let me close with an example of the brain.

    讓我舉個關於大腦的例子來結束今天的演講

  • The first place where you would expect

    如果我們最先期待

  • to see enormous evolutionary pressure today,

    看到一個器官的顯著進化

  • both because of the inputs,

    不僅因為

  • which are becoming massive,

    在這方面越來越多的研究投入

  • and because of the plasticity of the organ,

    而且由於其具有可塑性

  • is the brain.

    那麼這個器官就是大腦

  • Do we have any evidence that that is happening?

    有證據證明這種進化正在發生嗎?

  • Well let's take a look at something like autism incidence per thousand.

    讓我們來看看每千人中自閉症發生概率

  • Here's what it looks like in 2000.

    這是2000年的狀況

  • Here's what it looks like in 2002,

    這是2002年的狀況

  • 2006, 2008.

    2006,2008

  • Here's the increase in less than a decade.

    這是不到10年的時間裏所增加的數量

  • And we still don't know why this is happening.

    我們直到現在也不知道為什麼是這樣

  • What we do know is, potentially,

    我們所知道的是,

  • the brain is reacting in

    大腦潛在的以一種

  • a hyperactive, hyper-plastic way,

    極度活躍的方式在反應

  • and creating individuals that are like this.

    並創造出同樣活躍的個體

  • And this is only one of the conditions that's out there.

    這僅僅是其中存在的一種情況

  • You've also got people with who are extraordinarily smart,

    我們還見過非常聰明的人

  • people who can remember everything they've seen in their lives,

    過目不忘的人

  • people who've got synesthesia,

    能產生牽連感覺的人

  • people who've got schizophrenia.

    精神分裂的人

  • You've got all kinds of stuff going on out there,

    我們見過各種各樣的情況

  • and we still don't understand

    但現在依舊不明白

  • how and why this is happening.

    為什麼這一切發會生,是又如何發生的

  • But one question you might want to ask is,

    大家可能要問

  • are we seeing a rapid evolution of the brain

    大腦是在高速進化嗎?

  • and of how we process data?

    我們是怎樣處理資料的?

  • Because when you think of how much data's coming into our brains,

    當涉及到有多少資料進入大腦時

  • we're trying to take in as much data in a day

    我們現在一天內要接收的資訊

  • as people used to take in in a lifetime.

    相當於過去人們一輩子所接收到的資訊

  • And as you're thinking about this,

    現在大家考慮一下這個問題

  • there's four theories as to why this might be going on,

    這裏有四種理論來解釋這種現象

  • plus a whole series of others.

    以及一系列其他的理論

  • I don't have a good answer.

    我給不出一個漂亮的答案

  • There really needs to be more research on this.

    在這方面確實還需要更多的研究

  • One option is the fast food fetish.

    一個選擇是速食迷戀

  • There's beginning to be some evidence

    開始有證據表明

  • that obesity and diet

    肥胖和飲食

  • have something to do

    與基因改造

  • with gene modifications,

    有關

  • which may or may not have an impact

    但不能確定

  • on how the brain of an infant works.

    它對嬰兒大腦運作的影響

  • A second option is the sexy geek option.

    第二個選擇是“性感的書呆子”

  • These conditions are highly rare.

    這種情況確實很少見

  • (Laughter)

    (笑聲)

  • (Applause)

    (掌聲)

  • But what's beginning to happen

    現在的情況是

  • is because these geeks are all getting together,

    這些書呆子們聚在一起

  • because they are highly qualified for computer programming

    他們有很高的電腦編程技能

  • and it is highly remunerated,

    酬勞很高

  • as well as other very detail-oriented tasks,

    還有從事其他注重細節的工作

  • that they are concentrating geographically

    他們集中到一起

  • and finding like-minded mates.

    尋找志同道合的人

  • So this is the assortative mating hypothesis

    所以這就是選擇性交配假設

  • of these genes reinforcing one another

    這些基因在體系中

  • in these structures.

    互相增援

  • The third, is this too much information?

    第三,資訊是不是太多了?

  • We're trying to process so much stuff

    我們的大腦試圖處理太多的資訊

  • that some people get synesthetic

    以至於有些人產生了牽連感覺

  • and just have huge pipes that remember everything.

    他們擁有巨大的管道來記住所有事情

  • Other people get hyper-sensitive to the amount of information.

    有一些人對大量資訊過分敏感

  • Other people react with various psychological conditions

    有一些人對資訊做出反應時

  • or reactions to this information.

    伴隨著各種各樣心理上的狀況和反應

  • Or maybe it's chemicals.

    也許是化學反應

  • But when you see an increase

    如果發現

  • of that order of magnitude in a condition,

    某種情況的數量大幅度提升

  • either you're not measuring it right

    不是測量不準確

  • or there's something going on very quickly,

    就是有什麼事情正在迅速發展

  • and it may be evolution in real time.

    說不定就是在進化

  • Here's the bottom line.

    歸根結底

  • What I think we are doing

    我認為作為一個物種

  • is we're transitioning as a species.

    我們正在轉化

  • And I didn't think this when Steve Gullans and I started writing together.

    當Steve Gullans和我一起寫作的時候我並不這樣認為

  • I think we're transitioning into Homo evolutis

    我覺得我們正在向演化人轉化

  • that, for better or worse,

    無論是好是壞

  • is not just a hominid that's conscious of his or her environment,

    這都不僅僅是一個只對周圍環境有意識的人種

  • it's a hominid that's beginning to directly and deliberately

    而是一个直接的、有意的

  • control the evolution of its own species,

    想要控制

  • of bacteria, of plants, of animals.

    自己的种族、細菌、植物、乃至動物进化的人种

  • And I think that's such an order of magnitude change

    我認為,如果我們的孫輩或重孫輩

  • that your grandkids or your great-grandkids

    與我們是完全不同的物種

  • may be a species very different from you.

    將是一個翻天覆地的改變

  • Thank you very much.

    謝謝大家

  • (Applause)

    (掌聲)

Translator: Timothy Covell Reviewer: Morton Bast

譯者: Zheng Song 審譯者: Ren Wan

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

B1 US TED 基因 細胞 人類 變異 幹細胞

【TED】胡安-恩裡克斯:我們的孩子會是一個不同的物種嗎?(胡安-恩裡克斯:我們的孩子會是一個不同的物種嗎?) (【TED】Juan Enriquez: Will our kids be a different species? (Juan Enriquez: Will our kids be a different species?))

  • 33 1
    Zenn posted on 2021/01/14
Video vocabulary