Subtitles section Play video
(gentle music)
- [Instructor] What are some of the global threats
so biodiversity?
First, I want to emphasize that virtually everything
we do locally has global consequences.
When we talk about something like a greenhouse gas
or a pollutant, that's something we produce locally
from our car or from other things that make up
so many of our day to day human activities.
But in the grand scale of things,
even these local activities and impacts
can have global effects.
Greenhouse gases aren't just carbon dioxide,
they also include water vapor, methane,
ozone and nitrous oxide but for this tutorial,
we want to focus on the major effects
of carbon dioxide which chemists refer to as CO2.
Increases in the amount of carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere mostly come through
the burning of fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels contain huge amounts
of carbon and when they're burned,
they not only release heat energy
but they also release carbon dioxide
although it's the energy, the heat that we want,
carbon dioxide is a side product of the burning.
That's why atmospheric CO2 is increasing.
Why are so many people concerned about that
in terms of global change?
The answer means we need to say a few words
about the greenhouse effect and how that actually works.
Light rays from the sun arrive in our atmosphere
as shorter wavelength radiation.
This light energy hits the surface of the earth.
Some of it is reflected back in the form
of slightly longer wavelength radiation
and it's this longer wavelength radiation
that falls into what is known as the infrared area
of the spectrum.
Infrared is the same as heat, basically.
So when light hits the surface of the earth,
it's changed into heat energy.
That heat energy is, to a certain extent,
absorbed and some of it's reflected back up into space
but greenhouse gases actually have a kind
of snacking preference for longer wave radiation
like infrared energy.
This keeps the heat energy close to the earth's surface
instead of allowing it to go out into space.
The more greenhouse gas you have, the more
the heat builds up.
It's no coincidence that this is called
the greenhouse effect.
It works almost exactly like a gardener's greenhouse.
A greenhouse is made of panes of glass
and all that nice sunlight goes through the glass.
It strikes the plants, the soil, the stuff inside
the greenhouse but much of it becomes infrared light
or heat held within your greenhouse and bouncing around
through the air inside to make things nice and warm.
To a certain extent, like our little plants
in the greenhouse, earth's organisms benefit from
the greenhouse effect.
Life on earth would probably be quite different
or perhaps not exist at all if we didn't have
some greenhouse effect.
The problem is that now we've increased the rate
at which greenhouse gases are being introduced
to the atmosphere and therefore the rate
at which warming occurs.
Even gardeners have to regulate the flow of light
into a greenhouse to keep it from overheating
and cooking their veggies before they even get picked
off the plant.
So there's your problem.
Rate.
It's not so much that CO2 buildup is happening,
it's happened before in the history of the earth.
Scientists even see cycles to these things
but it's the current rate at which CO2 content
is changing that's the running theme behind all
of the problems that we're seeing today.
Life just can't keep up.
Here's a graph that demonstrates CO2 content
in our atmosphere over time.
What I like about this particular one is we go
from about 400 thousand years ago to the present.
We've got these hundred thousand year intervals
and a series of interesting drops and peaks
and drops and peaks and then coming to the present,
it kind of goes off the charts so much
that we've gotta magnify that part of the graph
to see it better.
In here, in the industrial age, we're experiencing
this greatly enhanced period of carbon dioxide production
through the activities of humans.
There are agencies out there that are very concerned
with this problem.
One of them is the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change or IPCC.
According to the most conservative IPCC estimates,
the global temperature on earth,
and this is an average temperature
over the whole planet by the way,
is going to rise 1.1 to 2.9 degrees celsius
during this century.
That's two to 5.2 degrees fahrenheit.
Modeling or estimating what will happen is tricky
which is why we have these suggestive ranges
instead of precise single figures.
But what we can say is that in the worst case scenario
models, we're talking 2.4 to over six degrees celsius
and that's a whopping 4.3 to 11.5 degrees fahrenheit.
Imagine the repercussions.
If I think about going to my thermostat
and just suddenly overnight dialing it up 10 degrees,
not only are my electric and gas bills gonna go through
the roof but it gets beyond cozy
when it's over 80 degrees in my house.
It's not really my optimum temperature.
For one thing, the ice in my drink's gonna melt
a heck of a lot faster which is equally unfortunately
one of the major problems for the earth as well.
We're talking of course about global sea level rise.
It's really the continental ice masses
that should be giving us the greatest cause for concern.
It's fairly simple, melting of ice on places
like Greenland and high mountains, for example,
will result in more water going into the ocean.
The frozen elephant in the room is Antarctica
because almost all of the ice there is on the continent
which means that when it melts, it will add enormously
to the amount of water in the ocean.
Even partial melting of Greenland and Antarctica together
could result in four to six meters or about 13 to 20 feet
more water in the ocean worldwide.
But it could take several hundred years for that.
People are looking at this very, very carefully
because if you think about 20 feet, that's enough
that entire countries like the Maldives which exist largely
as low lying atolls in the Indian Ocean
would disappear underwater.
Almost any low lying area, the Netherlands, aka Holland,
for example, or New Orleans, would face
serious additional flooding threats
and then you add to that things like hurricane
and typhoon storm surges and it's an enormous problem.
What does this mean for biodiversity though?
Well, in the first place, you're gonna lose
these low lying places and therefore their habitats
and the species living in them.
Some of these habitats are home to rare
and endangered species.
Apart from the actual change in sea level,
what really is a major problem for biodiversity
is the warming itself.
Again, remember that every species has its own
optimal habitat and tolerance ranges
and that includes all the things that go along
with living in the right temperature regime.
The IPCC estimates that a four degree celsius increase,
just over seven degrees fahrenheit is gonna result
in major extinction due to the inability
of organisms to adapt to the changes.
It's this rate thing again.
Organisms can't move to cooler areas fast enough
or adapt fast enough.
Sure, some migratory animals can change their patterns
of migration a bit but what about the organisms
that can't change, what about the ones that can't move?
Entire forests come to mind, think of mountain ranges.
Forests will move further up the mountainsides
completely altering or displacing entire ecosystems
as they go and we've got really interesting examples
from some of our own investigators here at the academy,
please like Dave Kavanaugh who studies endemic beetles
specialized to live in the icy areas high on mountains.
These colder places are disappearing.
The beetles are moving to higher and higher elevations
but pretty soon, they're going to run out of mountain.
Even marine ecosystems are not immune.
A two degree celsius increase in the ocean,
about 3 1/2 degrees fahrenheit doesn't sound like that much
but it's a lot because we're talking about a huge amount
of extra heat over the entire huge size of the ocean
and we've been talking about an average number.
Some places are going to be warmer than that.
Some are going to be cooler but an overall two degree
celsius increase is enough to result
in major coral reef die offs.
Reefs just can't respond to these rapid temperature changes
fast enough nor move to other places.
Even assuming that other suitable habitat was available.
Those are some of the effects of global warming
but we also need to talk about the chemistry of adding CO2
to the world's ecosystem.
There's some early evidence that shows all the regions
of the world are gonna be affected one way or another
just by the simple addition of CO2 even if you don't talk
about the global warming consequences.
Studies indicate that plant life tends to react
to an increase in CO2 by building more of themselves
through that amazing process of photosynthesis.
The amount of carbon dioxide that plants use
and turn into organic molecules for their own use
is what we're talking about in fancy terminology
like sequestration and carbon fixation.
It's just plants saying, "Oh, hey, there's more carbon
"dioxide, I can make more of myself."
That sounds on the face of it like a good thing.
How bad could more plants actually be?
In fact, sequestration and fixation are likely reasons
that we haven't already had truly runaway global warming.
But there's a limit.
There's an upper level to how much plants can collect,
use or sequester carbon and thereby reduce
surrounding carbon dioxide levels.
That's because CO2 is not usually the chemical
that runs out first as plants build more of themselves.
It's kind of like saying well you know I could put lots
and lots of oil in my car and it seems to be running fine.
Without remembering to add some gas every now and then,
you're gonna run out of gas and your car eventually stops
even though you have lots of oil.
Biodiversity in that sense could actually decrease
as the carbon dioxide levels increase
because you've got unequal abilities among plant species
to sequester or absorb all this new carbon dioxide.
As that happens, biodiversity or species' richness
can drop because plants more sensitive to the limitations
of other necessary chemicals will die.
Forests, marine fighter plankton
and their surrounding ecosystems become less functional
as species die off and therefore less effective
in sequestering carbon dioxide
causing a kind of feedback loop
in which global climate change actually
gets worse and worse as the unused CO2 builds up.
Think of that next time you hear a car go by.
Even something that local can go global in a way
that has huge effects really worth thinking about.
(gentle music)