Subtitles section Play video Print subtitles DR. STANLEY MURASHIGE: This is the Chinese term for what we're translating into English as "landscape." And it's important to see the Chinese and to understand what it's about because once one starts to see the term in Chinese, one begins to realize how different this must be from what we mean by "landscape." For example, here I am in Chicago teaching, and as David Roy, who retired from University of Chicago used to say, if you have x-ray vision, you will not see mountains in Illinois. So in the Chinese tradition then, if you went out to the cornfields of Illinois and you painted the landscape that you saw, it would not be considered this. Because the Chinese terms "mountain"-- or mountains because the Chinese doesn't differentiate singular or plural here-- and you could think of it as meaning both simultaneously, mountains and water, quite literally, shan shui. So when we look at the emergence of what becomes a great classical traditional Chinese landscape painting in the 10th and 11th centuries when it does emerge I'll show you some earlier images that have mountains and streams in them. You have to have mountains. If there are no mountains, it's not landscape painting. And I have some slides that talk a little bit about yin yang because it's important in the context of earlier Chinese landscaping. There is a kind of a yin yang implication here where mountains and water or rivers and streams refer to two inclinations or tendencies in nature. That is to say that mountains are expressive of the tendency of things to grow high, to grow up towards the sky, to be solid, to change slowly because mountains do change, and to be hard. Water, on the other hand, flows downward, softer. It turns into mist. It's not graspable. It's more open to dramatic changes. So they complement each other. So mountains and streams become mutually entailing complementary expressions of the whole world of nature. And one doesn't encounter really the equivalent, at least in the texts I've encountered, for the English word "nature," either. You'll find terms like mountains and streams or rivers and forests and so on, but the all-encompassing term "nature" is another matter altogether. This is an early example of mountains and water. This is not really landscape. It's a cast bronze incense burner, quite a spectacular object excavated in the late 1960s by Chinese archaeologists from a tomb of a Han Dynasty imperial prince, Prince Liu Sheng, who died 113 B.C.E. And this is something that was buried with him. And it's a mountain island. So this down here depicted in inlaid gold in these scroll forms are patterns of water. The term that we could use, at least at this time, we can call this chi. Chi could be vapor. It could be patterns of vapor. It could be clouds. It could be the forms of mountains. It can be also the forms of water. So in this particular context, this is water and water that swirls up. And it almost turns into these oddly-shaped peaks. There are actually holes cast in and among the mountain peaks so that when the incense is lit, you can imagine the smoke of the incense swirling around these peaks. So an incense burner that was buried with Prince Liu Sheng. Usually identified as one of the legendary islands of immortals, mountain islands of immortals, one of three that exist somewhere off of the Northeast coast of China. The interest in mortality and longevity was important for Han Dynasty culture and also for later Chinese culture and Daoism in particular. But I wanted to put the character for "immortal" that we're translating as "immortal" down here, which is literally a person on the left next to a mountain. A mountain person is immortal. So just by way of introduction, the notion of mountains and streams is connected with a long history of, let's say interest, and what we call it simplistically, cult of immortality, request for longevity in ancient Chinese culture. This is a probably copy of an early original painting. This is just the detail of a hand scroll, ink and color on silk, that is attributed to a painter named Gu Kaizhi, who was living and working in the 300s, dying around about 406 in the common era. And the subject is a poem, so this is an illustration of a poem. The poem is the immortal-- sometimes immortal-- nymph of the Luo River. And there she is set in a landscape. Mountains and then we have streams here. And she's floating above the streams and so we have again immortality associated with the world of mountains and streams here in an illustration of a poem. We move into a Buddhist context. And this will be pushing into the sixth century, into the middle of the sixth century. This is just a small detail of wall paintings in a cave sanctuary, a cave shrine, a part of a monastic site, a Buddhist shrine out-- and I showed you slides for that before the break-- out in the Gobi Desert near Dunhuang. Cave 249, mid-sixth century. And it shows here this is an element of the sky. And there's actually a Chinese sky god immortal, though identified in this context as the god Indra. And then all sorts of other deities and denizens of the sky realm. And then down here the world of mountains picked out in mineral blue and some brown ink. And with a hunting scene here. So this is the world of mountains and streams down below. In another Buddhist context, mid-eighth century, this is again the small detail from a larger mural. And the mural's basically Buddhist subject matter, Buddhist narrative subject matter. So now we have mountains that are strung together in sequences of overlapping forms, conical shapes that are layered together to create a sense of mountain ranges where the mountains and also zigzagging streams are ways of framing a narrative, which is then identified by these blanks here that the text is now gone. So making the subject matter of this narrative a little bit obscure although thought perhaps the depictions of the pilgrimage of the early Tang Dynasty monk Xuanzang be depicted here. Others have suggested these are illustrations of fables and tales from the Lotus Sutra. Peter started out his talk with a parable from the Lotus Sutra. Anyway, so mountains in mineral blue and green here now. We're pushing into the 10th century. We start seeing the emergence of what we can call landscape painting per se. And this is a painting that has some controversy about it. And I'm one who thinks it's an early painting, and others, my colleagues don't agree with me about it. This is a painting that's in the Nelson Atkins museum in Kansas City. And I think it's battered, it's beat up. It's been restored and has some old restoration on it. And some of the paint has flaked off. We don't really know what the title might have been. It's generally just called "Travelers in a Mountain Landscape." It's attributed to this 10th century artist Jing Hao. Also, we have some writing surviving, supposedly written by Jing Hao on landscape painting. This is not a large painting. I don't remember. I didn't have with me handy the actual dimensions, but I remember the image may not be much larger than this. So it's not a really large hanging scroll. What I want to do is show you some details of this image and then start to lay out what I call some of the conventions or some of the vocabulary of 10th and 11th century landscape painting to familiarize you with the language, the visual language of it. Also keeping in mind that the language of this painting is full of an inherent-- emerges as an inherited practice, just the way the writing system in calligraphy works. And you have the eight basic brush strokes, and you have a stroke number and order when you're writing in a character. You also have patterns of practice. We have structuring, improvised practice that is very much a part of the landscape painting tradition. Now I called some of the things I'm going to describe conventions, but I haven't come up with a better word for it because convention sounds so absolute. You know it's like, these are the rules, and you have to follow these rules, and this is how you do it. It's much more open-ended than that. There are sort of inherited patterns of ways of arranging compositions, of subject matter, of including certain kinds of motifs, that are not absolutely defined. The texts don't actually describe them. I'm going to actually articulate them for my own cataloging of them. But they're open-ended and so that there are ways of structuring organization into the present moment unfolding. And in the creative unfolding of that moment, those very structures that beget your participation in that moment can actually then themselves be changed by how you realize them in that moment. So no real absolute rules about this, although it seems that there are a lot of apparent prescriptions in painting. Here's a detail of the lower part of the painting. You see here. And there are people in it and the people are all in this ghostly white. And that's because a lot of the detail has flaked off, and this is lead white pigment. So this is a mountain landscape, perhaps even might have been meant as a winter landscape given all the presence of the lead white here, with small people floating around, going about their business. This is the upper part of the painting, which has this grand mountain peak. And then there is over here temple buildings. These are palatial style architecture, timber frame architecture, and the presence of temple buildings is in gorges and valleys and mountains is one of the kind of conventional motifs that recur in 10th and 11th century landscape painting and then later landscape paintings. I've taught this material for so long I ended up sort of evolving a phrase to describe this convention. Temple buildings nestled in the gorge partially obscured by mist and trees. I have to find -- and I realized I was saying this over and over and over again, and students were memorizing it. I would get these essay exams back and they'd say, temple buildings nestled in the gorge partially obscured by mist and trees. And one graduate student made an art project out of it where she asked me to translate it into, of all things, classical Chinese and read it in Chinese and then read it in English. And then she refragmented it, and so there's my voice for 10 minutes going on repeating this phrase. So there we have it. Temple buildings nestled in the gorge partially obscured by mist and trees. Trees down at the bottom here, and this is a detail so you get some people there. That's right here. And this man is also a kind of a recurring motif. He showed up in the blue and green Tang Dynasty landscape. I suggest it might be referring to the story of a pilgrimage of Xuanzang. There was a image of a man with a broad-brimmed hat on a horse. Well, here's an image of a man on maybe a horse but possibly a mule. Eventually it's become standard that he rides a mule, and he has a broad-brimmed hat. He's emerging from behind the slope. And this recurs in a lot of Chinese landscape paintings later. He becomes poeticized. He becomes a kind of trope for the lone wanderer, wandering among mountains and streams, except that he usually gets to the point where he's not alone. He always has an attendant who's a little bit smaller than he is, always on foot. And then another detail and some more figures. That's over here. More people right there, and they're next to-- this is a hole in the painting. The painting is really badly damaged so there are spots in it where there is no painting. You're looking at this dark area. You're looking at the backing of the painting. More people up here. And one of the things that's characteristic of 10th and 11th century landscape paintings for the most part is that when you see people, they are going about their business. No matter how strange the landscape looks. They're just, OK, I've got the kids here. I'm carrying goods up this slope. Or you're traveling, and you're wandering. And actually, Guo Xi , in his teachings to his son in the 11th century about landscape paintings is that well, you want to focus on those elements of mountains and streams which are suitable for dwelling, wandering, traveling, and gazing. And they become for me anyway the four almost canonical ways of structuring the human encounter with nature in the world of landscape painting and also the poetry of painting as well. So what nature is is something you do. It's not a place. Nature is thinking about it. Nature is writing poetry about it. Nature is wandering through it. It is living in it. It is imagining living in it. It is something that you participate in. Let me start outlining some of the broader, shall I say, conventional practices or patterns of practice that inform 10th and 11th century landscape paintings. Composition. Composition is how you lay out the forms in the image. You will have, first of all, the great mountain. And there's a hierarchy of the realm of nature. In the 10th and 11th century, there's a keen sense that nature and human beings mirror each other socially. So as in the case of the human community, there's a hierarchy so there is in the world of mountains and streams. And that is the great mountain, who in the 11th century is at times identified as the sovereign mountain. And then once you have the sovereign mountain, you lay out the smaller forms of mountains. So we have a hierarchy dominated by what we might call a great mountain or the main mountain or the lord mountain, so to speak. Now this main mountain that dominates the hierarchy of the painting is usually paired with trees down at the bottom. So we have the summit of the mountain, and down below here is a group of tall trees, near the bottom. And this is a pairing that we'll see over and over and over again. Now it's not an absolute rule. We're going to see variations on it. And sometimes it doesn't actually exist, and the trees are replaced by a rock. Because down here we also have another kind of pairing that appears commonly, the mountain summit juxtaposed against, down at the bottom, large boulders, large clusters of rocks. Now then, we have the division along this, shall we say, this relationship, this correlation here, the division of-- in the vertical format-- the division of the painting space into the left half and the right half, where one half is more open space. In this particular example, the space on the left side is more open here and given to more horizontal forms. On the right side, by way of complement parity, we have a more densely packed, almost closed off space, where the forms are vertical in orientation, vertical forms. So they complement each other and where these two kinds of space meet is in the middle where we have the lord mountain. Not quite so visible here, and perhaps because it's 10th century we see this phenomenon that I'm going to talk about in a moment, more prominent in later paintings, is also a shifting point of view from top to bottom. The painting is divided along axes. You can imagine a vertical axis cutting into the painting and also a horizontal axis right to the middle of the painting. Now along these axes, particularly along the vertical one, you're going to have a shifting point of view so that when you're looking at the summit of the mountain, you're looking at it from down below. When you're looking at these rocks down here and the trees down here below, you're looking from up above. And where the middle horizontal axis is, you're looking straight on. Now I tell this to art students, who say, well, you got that kind of perspective in the Renaissance. And then I say to them, does this look like a Renaissance painting spatially? And they say, well, no. Well, one of the reasons is because spatially, what's happening is that as you are looking up and you're looking down, you are moving. So the way I describe this to my students is imagine the plane of the picture where you have the fulcrum of a seesaw. And you as the viewer are on one end of the seesaw, and the horizon line is on the back end of the seesaw. And so that as you look up to the summit, your end of the seesaw is going down, and the horizon line-- which you see is our horizon line here-- goes up. When you look down on these rocks, as you shift your gaze from top down, your end of the seesaw goes up, and the horizon line goes down. When you're in the middle, you're both balanced, and you're right here in the middle. What is also almost a magical kind of phenomenon is that-- This is almost sort of quantum mechanics in a way-- when you look at any detail, no matter where it is, when you think in detail, and you look at the summit or you look down here below, you're always looking straight on. And you're like, whoa. Because it's kind of mind-- It freaks my students out. It's mind-blowing. All right. There is also, though, because of the hanging scroll format, most of the paintings of this era are surviving in this vertical format. Because of the vertical format and the proportions of the rectangle here, it's not so prominent but you also start to get the shifting point of view left and right. So that when you look towards left, you've moved over to the right. When you look to the right, you move over to the left. It's not so prominent, but it starts to emerge there also. So those are the basic, overall compositional sorts of structures that one sees recurring in 10th and 11th century landscape paintings but also in paintings that are later than 10th and 11th century that are emulating the tradition of the 10th and 11th century. So they start, too. They show up in later paintings. And very few paintings from this period survive. You can count the number of authenticated paintings, or generally accepted paintings, minus contemporary art historians, that date from this period on both hands and have a few fingers left over. Interestingly enough, I was just telling a participant in the break that two of these paintings are in Kansas City, Missouri. And this Is one of them, and another one later on you'll see. So there are other kinds of things, too, that are more, what shall we say, motifs that show up. I already mentioned the temple buildings, but there are also bridges for the idea of wondering and traveling. And you will see, besides fancy temple buildings, you'll see more rustic kinds of cottages for the idea of dwelling. Sometimes viewing pavilions. You will see-- I know it's not so present here. You might not be able to see it so well in this slide, but streams cascading over rocks. That's another motif. Waterfalls and streams cascading over rocks. The broad-brimmed hatted guy on the mule shows up quite a bit. So "vocabulary," quote unquote of 10th and 11th century landscape painting, the great or sovereign mountain, hierarchical relationships, division of the painting along axes vertical and horizontal. This is from teaching. I start to put more text in that summarizes and [INAUDIBLE]. A differentiation of the space left and right, one side more open and horizontal, the other dense and vertical. The correlation between the main mountain summit and a grove of tall trees below. Oh, by the way, I forgot to mention that in the tall trees below, one's got to be bent. At least one's got to be bent and sometimes really twisted and gnarly. The shifting point of view along the vertical and horizontal axes. Water or river below. We've got pools of water that suggest seeing part of a river or a large stream. Streams cascading over rocks and waterfalls. Temple buildings nestled in the gorge. Simple rustic cottages, pathways and bridges. People going about their business. And then the mule rider with the big hat. So here's another painting compared to the Jing Hao painting I just showed you. This one is an attribution. It's not very likely to be of this period, but it shows a lot of the same kinds of features. You see the main mountain, and you can see the mountain head or the summit is similar in shape to Jing Hao's painting. We have our trees down here below, not exactly the same but in a different configuration. But still that idea here, and here's our bent one down here below. We have a space that's more open on one side and more closed on the other side. We have stream that cascades over rocks. We have a ridge here. I'll show you a few details, including-- Let's see. Here we go. Here's a detail of the summit, and guess what's here. There's our temple, and I'm sorry this slide's not so good. There's our temple building. And then here's the detail at the bottom, ridges. There's a little bit of a scene of a village down here below. There's a pathway here. And we get a close-up view, there is our guy on the donkey, the hat. There's a little bit of domesticity, including various depictions of mules sleeping on the ground and lots of narrative observation of this world. This is a world alive, and those small human beings are very much a part of this world. Here's another example. Again, open on one side, closed on the other side. We have a dominant cluster of mountains. We have tall trees down here below. Here's a bent tree. Add another one for good measure. We have a zigzagging stream that cascades over rocks and I get really fancy. Bingo, there's a temple building nestled in a snowy gorge. And then another example, it's attributed to really important 11th century landscape painter, but this is an attribution. It's probably a later painting. I'm showing our dominant mountain. Slightly more open space on this side, closed off space here. Waterfalls, a division of the painting, horizontal and then the vertical axis. And the mountain is slightly off axis. That's perfectly OK. We have a cluster of trees down here below. And then at least one tree is bent. And then down here, I'll zoom in, if you can make it out. If you can make that out, that's over here. Guess what. There's our temple building again. Mist, lots of mist, is also part of the 10th and 11th century tradition. I should put that down on my list. Mist, mist enshrouded mountains. Here's yet another one. We have our dominant mountain. And then we have closed off on one side, open on the other side. We have a waterfall with streams cascading over rocks. the division of the painting along axes, and et cetera. There's, guess what, there's our temple building. And then this is also in Kansas City. It's actually a wonderful painting. Though the composition is extraordinary, the execution is a little bit repetitive, suggesting to some of us that it's a copy of some extraordinary work that we no longer have. Attributed to Li Cheng, one of the most important, at least on record anyway, 10th century painters. And then we have central mountain peaks, base goes around it. Our temple is now prominently placed along these central horizontal axis. The pagoda of the temple occupies an extraordinary position at the intersection of the horizontal axis with the vertical, which is an important-- usually in these paintings-- an important moment of transition. It's where you find mist. It's that moment where the human viewer and the horizon line are level. There's a moment of transition between the watery realm of the earth and the sky realm, with humans in the middle. Streams and rivers down here. There's a bridge here. There, by the way, there's a broad-brimmed hatted guy down here in the lower right hand corner. Which side is more open? Which side is more closed? Not so clear. It's kind of ambiguous. And that's part of the point is that, like as I was saying, that these are open-ended kinds of inherited practices. They're not absolute rules. They don't bother to write them down. There are probably regional variations on these kinds of things, personal ones. Different teachers have different approaches. But the idea is that this is a kind of practice and discipline that is the structuring that enables you to be free to be creative in the moment, to participate in the spontaneous unfolding of the moment. So it may seem to a kind of modernist point of view shared by many art students is that how can this kind of structure allow originality, authenticity, and freedom? But Henry was saying this morning, if you don't have a kind of structure, what do you have? You have nothing. You have chaos. There is no possibility for freedom. All right. Now this is one of the great paintings that survives in the handful that survived from the 11th century by this artist named Fan Kuan. And I'll show you a few details of it. And there's the large mountain. It is a little bit more open on the left side. But this is enormous mountain. And the general narrative of modern art history about 11th century landscape paintings, this is the moment when Chinese artists are most interested in depicting the world that they see. Yes and no, I think that takes us in the wrong direction. The way I see it is that there's something about the concrete physical world that one lives in becomes much more important part of your participation in-- Henry was talking, alluding to-- now a metaphysics that's emerging into, shall we say, a neo-Confucian notion of practice. In any case, just to save some time, let me just show you a few details of this painting. I'm going to spend the last half hour mostly talking about one other painting, but I'll just quickly show you some details of this one. This one, that's a detail of this large rock down here below, sort of Rock of Gibraltar kind of configuration. It has two people in it. He's one of them. Where is he? He's here. And they're leading a pack of mules. And by the way, this detail's only like an inch or so. So this is extraordinary, right? And behind him, there's the caboose, his partner. That's right over here. The painting has a signature. This is supposedly the signature, and where is that? That's there, found by a Taiwanese art historian going over the painting with a magnifying glass in the '60s, I believe. And then this is the signature, and there's what it is in this awful font. Signatures, by the way, are no guarantee of authenticity, given the importance of the virtuosity in the handling of the brush, and the practice of calligraphy, signatures are very easily faked. So there are no guarantees of authenticity. Nor are seals, by the way. Seals are also easily faked. Cascading streams over rocks. And that's over here. And more detail on the bottom here. And another detail. This painting is a little over 80 inches high so it's a monumental work on silk. We have temple buildings there. But Fan Kuan is a little bit unconventional. So he's not really quite following all the rules, if you consider them rules, because of the way he modifies the orientation, where he puts the temple, for example. And there are no tall trees down at the bottom of the painting, although he does follow another convention of putting boulders down at the bottom. This is a detail here. This is where rhythm is the key to understanding the rendering of composition of landscape, but also what constitutes a rock, what constitutes mist, what constitutes the world of nature and mountains and streams is the rhythm. And the rhythm is expressive of correlationality. It's how things work together. Rhythm is the energy of how things interact together, the corresponding relationships. So if we think about how rhythm works in this detail, imagine, so this is the central axis. And we have these lines, these contours that extend out. You imagine, the way I describe this customarily, is you imagine this is water. You throw a pebble into the water, and you have these extending, radiating lines of energy that move outward. One of the characteristics, too, of all of these paintings-- this one, I'm just bringing this idea, this notion, this phenomenon out here-- is that along the central axis, the rhythm is always from the center, out and up. So this is energy that moves out and up and on the other side, energy that moves out and up this direction. When you come to the outer edges, to the left edge or to the right edge, the energy moves up and in, by way of complementing the energy that moves out and up. So this is not arbitrary in the sense that Fan Kuan is-- this is clearly a kind of pattern of practice that's going on. On the other hand, it's intended that part of the practice is, this is spontaneously executed. They do not sketch these things out. You go back to the studio. These are not real places necessarily. In a sense, it doesn't also mean, it's not quite right to say that they're imagined places because imagine takes is into the realm of human personal subjectivity versus the world out there. And that's not really quite what's going on here. But it's really taking the experience of the world, taking the world of mountains, and bringing them back into your studio, and then speaking them in the language of these conventions of composition, the motifs, patterns and techniques of brush work, handling ink washes and that sort of thing. Spontaneously, and spontaneous doesn't necessarily mean fast. The notion that a spontaneous gesture must look fast is something that comes out of the impressionists. Because impressionists in trying to achieve an unmediated realization of an absolute timeless truth, say, forget education, but if you think too much, the thinking is going to get in the way. And analysis and rationale doesn't get in the way. They're sort of romantics. They come out of romantic-- So the brush work is all spotted and quick. Why? Because you're trying not to think so you work fast. Get the quick sketch. That's a European modernist notion of spontaneity. So my students say, well, something like this doesn't look like it's done spontaneously. Well, spontaneity here means an utter virtuosic mastery of the practice that in the particular moment of the making of the painting, there's this extraordinarily insightful realization of participation in the rhythm of the moment, which includes the rhythm of your teachers, your family, your friends, and also the rhythm of nature. This is the notion of, shall we say, oneness. It's not some kind of necessary, some kind of mystical sort of disillusion off into an amorphous kind of infinity. But actually oneness is you as this particular person in the collaboration with others in the realization of unfolding of time, the world. And when you are able to do that-- and the analogy is music-- when you're able to do that, you're making music. And it's an event. Life is human beings, and it's this event that's unfolding. So it's time, and when you have that, that's spontaneity. So some patterns of trees. The techniques of the brush work here and all these different kinds of trees, this is basically one brush work, one brush technique here. And it's the same in all of these, but simply by varying pressure, varying tempo, inflecting the brush in different ways, you get different kinds of trees. And what's actually I think they're trying to show here is this is a family of trees that's different from this family of trees, except that they're all related. In one family, these are immediate family, and then these are the cousins. But simply by varying rhythm and situation. Patterns of leaves and pine needles. This is, by the way, this pine tree, which has extraordinary position in Fan Kuan's painting, he doesn't divide the painting top half, bottom half. He pushed it into top 2/3, bottom 2/3. This is where the balance of the seesaw is, and this is where this tree is. This is where the mist is. The forms down here are all horizontal and compressed. He's compressed the energy of the forms down into the bottom third. So it's like compressing a spring, and you have this energy that bounces in zigzag fashion among these forms. It's sort of like imagine compressing gases, and so there's this pressure that's built up. When you get here into the mist, all this pressure is released. All the forms go vertical, and this mountain seems tall, gargantuan, and monumental. It pushes out towards the left and right because it's like a rocket exploding. It's an acceleration. So size is a matter of acceleration and explosion of density. Now this is the painting I want to focus on the rest of this talk. Guo Xi's Early Spring dated to 1072. It's five feet, three inches high. Same sorts of things. We have our central mountain, open left half, closed right half. And I'll show you some details of it. Let's take a look at it. There's a detail of the lower left hand. There are people in it as well. Here they are. Two women. She's holding some stuff. Looks like they just disembarked from this boat. There's a kid here, and there's a little infant. She's carrying an infant. They seem to be in conversation. They're headed here. That's all going on here. They're headed home, simple rustic thatched roof cottages. Now these guys, with their sun hats, hunched over, bearing heavy loads up a steep incline, are right there. And then we have this guy poling his boat, fishermen shoring up his net. They are down here. This guy on a bridge, turning around to see what's going on. This guy is there, and he's looking at these two, a foreigner and guess who. Emerging from behind a slope, there. A viewing pavilion, that's there. And by the way, I should have mentioned temple building-- god, I should have mentioned the temple buildings right there. So there's all kind of an orientation of wandering directed in Guo Xi's Early Spring. So we start at the bottom with these boulders, and we have tall trees and a bent tree, really gnarly one here. So we start at the bottom. There's a kind of movement of these cloud-like boulders that takes us up towards the center. We stop and say hello to the trees, who greet us. And Guo Xi actually, in his teachings to his son, refers to them as junzi, using the Confucian term for exemplary person. So they're like junzi, ministers of the court, beckoning you. And so then that's the bottom half of the painting. He takes us into this swirling center here, and then we'll move off into the valley. Now here are the tall trees. An extraordinary painting. This is early in spring so the mountain world is waking up from its dormancy in winter. That's those bare trees there. And then the valley. So we proceed into the valley. This Is where the broad-brimmed hatted guy is, and so we're going to actually follow this in a kind of a clockwise turning. And the trees over here are sort of pointing their direction this way. Go that way. And these trees here at the left edge are pointing in, saying, go that way. Go that way. So we're going to go into the valley. We're listening to them. There's also a pair of cliffs up here, and I want to say something about the cliffs in a moment so that's where we're looking. The over-hanging cliffs here are actually also a kind of an inherited practice. Certainly, they're a reality in Chinese mountains. But also we see an eighth century detail of Dunhuang, a little detail. Actually, it's a Buddhist subject matter, but it shows over-hanging cliffs. You can make it out with a zigzagging stream. So Guo Xi's landscape motif has a old ancestor. There are also some mountains here, if you can make them out, in white. And then they have little vertical brown lines that indicate trees on top of the summit. This is from a mid-eighth century Chinese lute, a pipa. It's a plectrum guard. It guards the face of the pipa. It has this painted image on it. It's in Japan. It was a gift to the Japanese emperor. And it shows overhanging cliffs that open up onto a valley and a zigzagging stream. First, let me say something about these cliffs. There's a kind of relationality that I referred to just a minute ago with Fan Kuan's painting that shows corresponding kinds of relationships. The mountain has all these family-like, kinship-like relationships in it. For example, these two cliffs. We have two over-hanging cliffs that are very similar in shape. This sort of soft edge, and one is lighter in the back to the one that's darker here, but they seem to be very similar. Then we have another pair that are slightly different, more jagged edge. But these two seem to be related to each other. So you might say that this is like, say, younger brother, older brother, younger brother, older brother, but then they're cousins to each other. And there's a great deal of this kind of correlative sense of form that plays out throughout Guo Xi's painting. Now this is the signature and the title, Guo Xi and Early Spring. This is the date, and then we have Guo Xi's signature. So that's where this is. It's on the left hand side of the painting, right overlooking the valley. This is Guo Xi's signature here. It's partly effaced by damage to the silk. And the seal is underneath. Now when we get to the top of the painting, here we see more clearly these cliffs. Ignore the inscription. The inscription is added by the Qianlong emperor in the 18th century, and also this is his seal. So the inscription and the largest of the seals is not original to the painting. And then if we look at the summit, we have this undulating line with vertical lines to indicate trees at the summit. And then we have here a diagram of decorative imaging on an inlaid bronze tube from the Han Dynasty, second century B.C.E. And what's depicted here, I've marked out in the pink here, is an undulating-- originally in gold inlay-- of mountains. These are mountains with vertical striations that indicate trees at the tops of them, and we have an undulating line. And then this is second century B.C.E., and here we have 1072, Guo Xi is doing the same thing, but not the same thing. And he's not conscious. This is not a postmodern, conscious, historical allusion to the past. This is just something that grows naturally out of the traditional practice. We circle around. So we've come up from the trees, boulder, trees, swirling around the middle with these forms, swirling like a vortex. We spin into the valley, and we circle around the summit. We go up to the summit, and then we drop down through the mist here. And where we end up, in this densely filled valley. Down on the right side, here are temple buildings, and there's a cascading stream pouring over rocks. That's here. And then another detail, closer view of the stream. We have our temple buildings up at the top. And then these two trees, which are right here. Now these are extraordinary trees that I want to spend a little moment with this detail to show how this interdependent sense of response, this rhythm and the response that is really how the relationship of these two trees works. You start with this tree. We could start with the other one, but arbitrarily start with this one. It's a little closer to us. It overlaps the other one, and it rises out of the rocky soil in an arc, which is basically something like a quarter circle. It's not really a circle because it's more tightly bent here, and it starts to straighten out here. It's turning counter-clockwise, and it has a knot hole here, and then it bends 90 degrees. Well, the tree behind it says, OK. That's what you do. I'm going to do the same thing. I'm going to turn a quarter circle, then straighten out. I got my own knot hole. I'm also going to get really thick and craggy and all knotty down here below. And I'm also going to bend not quite at a right angle. And then I'm going to go up this way, and I'm going to shoot out another branch. And I'm going to go up this way. I'm going to go that way. So how do you feel about that? This tree then says, OK, well I'm going to go. Now you went clockwise. I'm going to go clockwise, too. So I go clockwise. I'm going to go up this way. And not only that, zigzag zigzag and disappear into the mist. This tree says, OK, I follow suit, zigzag zigzag into the mist. They sing together. Everything, every detail in this painting operates that way. Every detail. Nothing is isolated. Everything is seen in this-- when you focus on any detail-- everything relates to each other in this kind of rhythmic fashion, this play of give and take. Down the boulder down below. Clouds like clouds. Rhythm. What makes a rock a rock? This, it's an event. A rock is the event. Something happened. It's this billowing cloud of rock. That's the event. But the event is constituted in multiple events. What are those events? It's the rhythm of light and dark. Dark, light. Dark, light. Dark, light. Dark, light. Dark, et cetera. Pulse. Then we have overlapping forms. So you can imagine faces, facets, one over the other in sequence. This one here you can sort of define. Maybe this is another one. This is another facet. This is another one. And they're like also arcs, oval shapes, elliptic shapes, in sort of a curve. And then they turn with respect to each other counterclockwise or clockwise along a zigzagging line that pulses in the core of this rock. So you might think of it as a cam shaft in an internal combustion engine where these arcs, these forms, are turning in relationship to each other, and which way they turn depends upon where you are. If you're looking at one, it turns clockwise with respect to the other. And then you move on, the one that was once turning clockwise is now turning clockwise. So we have this kind of rotating zigzagging form in addition to the light and dark alternation, and then we have the edges of the boulder, which start to expand in these curves. So this thing balloons up in a world of aggregated rhythms, rhythmic forms and pulses. And then the growth is also transformation, extraordinary transformation, where what something is depends upon, first of all, your point of view at that particular moment of looking, and also, your point of view is also temporarily framing a set of conditions. And with that temporary set of conditions, you have that's what that thing is. When you shift your point of view, those older conditions don't quite hold. They give birth to new conditions, and so what thing was in one point is becoming something else in another. Transformation. So if we look at this gully here, which in sort of a Western tradition of representation would be delineation. Dark lines around an object are delineation. Delineation is a way of separating an object from the rest of the world, of isolating it as-- talking about using Henry's word-- autonomous from everything, to use a line to border it off. Chinese painting uses lines but never to delineate in that fashion. Lines always are about the connections, the sort of porous connections that really link things together. So what is this? We could say, well, this is a border to the right side of the rock. But actually it has a life of its own, depending upon where you look. Down here, yes, OK, that's the border, the edge of the rock. But then it starts to expand, it turns into a gully up here. And over here what is it? It's another rock, another cluster of boulders. If we're looking at this in relationship to this, yes, it's edge, it's gully, it's shadow. But when we look at this dark area in relationship to this, this is a body of water. So now it's shoreline. So what is it? Depends on your point of view, which is constantly changing. So then we get to here's a detail. Where's our temple buildings? Here, black and white. And we have this ridge here that's arcing, that's turning counterclockwise, by virtue of overlapping, undulating lines and planes. So you have this one. And on top of that one is this one. On top of that one is this one here, that's right here. I want to call your attention to the interesting light and dark relationship here. In the Art school, we call this a figure ground ambivalence. Now, in academic European painting, light and shadow are about modeling. It's about rendering three-dimensional mass and volume in space, so setting distinct objects in a space. they're separate from that space. And so seeing and perceiving is actually seeing light and shadow relationships. And it's interesting that it's an important way of seeing classically, in the history of art in Europe, when also the metaphors of light and shadow and light and dark are such powerful ones, in Europe, and not so powerful in China. light and shadow here, when you look at the light side, OK, it projects. The dark side recedes. Shift your point of view, and you look directly the dark side. Now, it projects and light recedes. It's not supposed to do that, if you're painting in, in the Renaissance or in the 19th century academy. But it does so in China. So you create this pulse that's happening, this rhythm of light and dark in their encounter. There's also a way of looking at how this ridge comes to be. And there are different ways of looking at. And one way of looking at it is from the point of view of deferentiality. So how does this white ridge achieve its particular shape, its uniqueness, its bulge here, its indentation here, and its indentation there? What it does is it says-- hypothetically, we say-- it says to the dark area, OK, I tell you what. I'm going to let you do you want to do, and I'll follow suit. I will respond in kind. You want to recede. I will push in. You want to push in. I will recede. Ah, you want to recede here, so I'll push in. By virtue of deference to the dark area, the light area actually most assertively becomes what it is, in its uniqueness. Conversely, the dark area is doing the same thing. This is harmony. This is what nature is. All right, the dark area says the same way. It says, all right, light area, you want to push in. I'll recede. You want to pull back. I'll push in, So on and so forth. So the two working together, work on the yin yang kind of exchange of mutual deference. They create this world. They create so everything in this painting has that sensibility to it. Now, let's look at this detail. Finally, two figures, the last figures I haven't shown you. They're right there. And they're climbing up a ridge. This ridge, well, it's a really small detail in the center of the painting, near where the vertical axis and the horizontal axis intersect. Look at this edge here. And one of the things about Chinese brush work and calligraphy is that, you can draw a line where the edges of that line are not parallel. You normally think of a line, and the edges of the line are even, not in calligraphy. You can do this extraordinary thing. You get a pulse here of the ridge. Let's look at this detail-- thick, thin, thick, thin, thick, thin, thick, thin, already has a rhythm. But it's a rhythm that is, in one sense, responding to nature and its physicality. With each change of thick and thin, there's a change in direction. So this thick is going down this way. Thin is going down this way. Thick is going down this way. Thick is going down this and turning. And then it turns here. It goes in two directions. And then it get thin, going this way. We're basically zigging and zagging. Think of that first brush stroke that I went through, in the first half of my talk. So we have a rhythm of thick and thin but a rhythm of zig and zag, smallest detail. We zoom out-- left, right, left, right. And we also have dark tone, light tone. So we have that sort of dark-light figure ground ambivalence in the rhythm of that. Now, what do we have? We have an interesting relationship between the zigzagging here and this tree, which is an S-curve here and another S-curve here. But we sort of make jagged S-curve and another jagged S-curve. And then, remember the two trees? They're over here. And that's all over here. So we have this extraordinarily relationship between these two different kinds of trees. And we also have this ridge that's further in the distance, working together. There is the sense too here, of another kind of S-curve that's underneath here, within the circle here. And that makes people think of this. This is an older sort of form of what we all the diagram of yin and yang. And so is Guo Xi putting the taiji, the yin yang symbol, in the center of early spring? Well, that's open to debate. I don't know. I mean, it's such a part of the spontaneous practices of the tradition, so much a part of your flesh and blood that it could come out naturally. What about yin and yang, the taiji? The way we generally talk about yin yang, which is basically here. The reason I'm bringing this up is because it's the rhythm of the world, in its novelty, the creation's novelty. It's this rhythm of the interaction of these two tendencies. Sometimes, yin and yang are described as forces and that sort of thing. And I tend to think. The language I use is that, yin and yang refer not to forces, so much as inclinations, tendencies, and proclivities, within a situation. And they're not really-- the way we talk about them and think of them as absolute opposites, ontological opposites. One sometimes reads that they're thought of in some kind of materialist dielectric or that sort of thing. That doesn't really quite work. They're interchangeable. And you say, well, how can they be interchangeable? That leads to an Orientalcy of Chinese paintings being sort of mysticism. The only way you can get two ontological opposite to become one is this mystery, some sort of magic or something like that. But it's really, really quite, in many ways, down to earth in what's going on. They way we could start to understand yin yang is not these kinds of radical opposites but are actually-- and it makes sense-- as inclinations that are mutually interchangeable. We look at the Chinese characters. We have a radical and phonetic. Radical is the left side. Radical is the same in both of them. The radical refers to a hill, H-I-L-L. What does a hill have to do with these cosmological principles? Well, yin was the shaded side of the hill. Yang was the sunny side of the hill. It's already beginning to sense that, well, wait a minute. It's the same on hill. But one side has go sun. The other side has got the light. And we being to start to see that these are relatively relationships. Although there is a tendency. One side of the hill tends to get the sun most of the time. And the other side doesn't. So yang becomes south. Yin becomes north. And here, yang becomes depicted as a graphed-out continuous line and a broken line here. We have these qualities, negative-positive, passive-active, female-male, receptive-creative. And we tend to think these are, again, the ontological opposites. And they're not really. What they are is, yin and yang are relational, completely relational. Nothing is absolutely yin. Nothing is absolutely yang. The way they're described is that, they cycle around each other, in a kind of diachronic fashion. First, you have things at their height. They're at yang, sort of like the seasons. Summer is yang. And then, we plunge into autumn, as we are now. And so we're heading into yin in winter, and so on. They cycle around each other. And that's a common way of understanding it. And there's another way also of understanding it that every situation unfolding is simultaneously yin and yang. So you and I are simultaneously yin and yang. And the way I sort of describe it to my students is, I say well, in this lecture, who's yin and who's yang? And usually they'll say well, Stanley. Obviously, you're yang and we're obviously yin. We're being passive. And I say, well, how passive are you? To what extent are you paying attention? To what extent are you responding in a certain fashion? Your very response, actually in a way no matter what that response is, could be snoozing and whatnot, is somehow an active response. My yang is a response to you. My yang is also a response to-- I'm sorry. The yin aspect of me is my response to you as I'm talking spontaneously. It's also my response to the symposium, and it's what it requires, what is asked, what it's invited me to do, it's invited us to do, which is a response to the greater call for the needs of Portland Community College and its interest, which is a greater response to higher education in the State of Oregon, west coast. How far do you want to go with this anyway to which I'm responding and to which you're also responding? So the question of who is yin and who is yang is not so-- we're both, depending upon your point of view, but there is also focus. In this particular case in the lecture, I'm more yang in a sense than you are. Sports. American football. The Team on the offense is yang and the team on the defense is yen. Right? So you have this offensive-- this running back with the ball. He's charging down the field, and we say, yeah, that's really yang. But every step he takes is in a response to what the defense is doing. So is he yin or yang? He's both. So that's another way of actually as a useful tool for bringing it down to the realm of the concrete and in particular in a way of understanding how yin and yang is not necessary kind of a mystical union of opposites, but actually very productive and fruitful way of thinking about-- skip this diagram-- of how world is a field of unfolding events, a continuous field unfolding. So what we have here, here's the detail of the two figures here, and here's the whole painting. Same thing. The rhythmic give and take, the yin-yang sort of impulse in this tiny stroke here, this tiny moment here is the whole painting. This is the same thing. S curve here and we have this as the meeting place of light and dark, or workspace that is, pushing in in the space that's extruding and that how they are complementary to each other and mutually entailing. So the whole painting works in this fashion on all levels. So we get to the one and the totality, the one and the many. The many are all the myriad events that are taking place in this world in this painting, and they constitute the great mountain. The great mountain is not some god that creates this world, It's actually constituted by the myriad events that take place. By the same time, the myriad events happen as part of that overall unfolding context of the whole, so they are in a sense also constituted by the whole and by each other. Music was the analogy. For me that's really important, and I do pick jazz and classical music because they're such discipline. Classical music in many ways plays an important part because of its formality, but they're both improvatory traditions. You have to master this discipline in order to perform in the freedom of spontaneity and the creative unfolding in the moment, and it's also social. Calligraphy and the enjoyment of the painting, and painting is actually a way of realizing your mutually-entailing relationship and interdependency with everything else. And that's the goal is actually to realize that participation. So the way I look at painting, there's another way, a level of looking at Guo Xi's Early Spring painting is that it is not at all any kind of way a representation of mountains or even an imagined or expressive representation of mountains, but rather it's a score for performance like this sheet of music. Because this sheet of music isn't music. It's a possibility for music to happen. Just as this painting is a possibility for a certain kind of event to happen. The event happens to be living out and re-performing the rhythms of nature, which is basically also for the viewer, the living out and the re-performance a Guo Xi's rhythm of painting it, and Guo Xi's masters and teachers, and Guo Xi's all of the experiences he's had in the complex world of interrelationships that he's lived out to the moment of that painting. You the proper viewer appropriately viewing can also relive that and re-perform that, and it is important and it's stated that you have to be the proper viewer. You can't just sort of like what we do. We go to the museum and say, that's cool. I like that. Let's move on. How long do you want to spend this museum? You know? It's like friends of mine that go with me says, I tell you what, you guys. You guys go on your own. I'm going to be here for hours. My feet are killing me, but it's just a difference in approach. But that's what's needed here. It's just a long look that is opening, is being deferential to the image. So viewing the image actually seduces you. It wants you, it invites you. There are all these rhythms. Look at the details. Look at the relation of the details of the whole. Absorb yourself into this extraordinary world that's coming into blossom under your gaze. You respond to it, and in a sense, it's responding to you. And then together in that moment of spontaneous view, you're making music. But with not just with the painting and not just with the mountains, but the whole world of extraordinary world of relationships that are happening, that have happened in the past, they are happening in the moment, and will continue to happen in the future. That's when painting happens. It's a performance of art. Just one I've shared since I've shown you hanging scrolls. Well, how does this work in a horizontal format? This is in Kansas City. This is an extraordinary painting of Kansas City. As it survives its ink on silk, its 18 inches high, but it's actually cut off about an inch off the bottom and an inch off the top. But as a horizontal format, we have the same kinds of things. We got tall trees here. We've got a bent tree here. It angles in to a zigzag extreme, and it takes you into a misty distance. We come to the middle of painting, what do you have? Great mountain. Hierarchy of form. Basically also even the 18 inches, you have this varying shifting point of view up and down. But the shifting point of view here now is horizontal, and you're moving it through the painting section by section. So it has all the elements of the vertical format, but now in horizontally. Then we come to the denouement. We have the smaller peaks. By the way, there's the broad rimmed head of Guo on the bridge. And then we come to the very end. You can see another view of him. He's looking pretty good. This is another fellow who's trying to get his mule into a ferry and the mule won't go, so he's raised his walking stick and he's going to whack the mule on the butt. This is the end of the scroll. It takes us into-- where does this take us? This is the end. It's actually an open-ended end. It takes us into the beginning as if you're going to begin this whole cycle over and over again. When you put the beginning and the end together, we have the great mountain in the middle, we have these trees that start off here, and we have the trees that angle us back in, kind of a refolding onto itself. So just to show you some mountains, what mountains in China actually look like. Even though these paintings that I'm showing you are not meant to be paintings of actual mountains. This is Mount Hua with some Daoist priests and the old, old photographs. And to show you, notice that there are buildings there. There they are. So there's a certain reality to these buildings nestled in precarious places. The easy way up. I've never been up Mount Hua, sorry to say. And these bent trees, extraordinary trees. This is Huangshan, Yellow Mountain, in Anhui Province. And the relationship of these forms to mists, which is constantly changing and moving, is another view. And these vertical peaks with trees and growing on these ridges. This is also Mount Hua. These so-called special mountains, sometimes called sacred mountains, don't think of them as singular peaks like Mount Fuji or [INAUDIBLE]. They're actually landscapes of multiple peaks and valleys and ridges and cliffs and streams. This is actually a detail of one mountain. But here's the stream down here below with our tiny people down here below. And then finally, the Wuyi Mountains here. So I think we have a couple of minutes left for a few questions. A very good question. Case of Guo Xi, the painting I just talked about. It's been a long time. He ends up being hired by the emperor, and he works for the Shenzong emperor. So he's an imperial court painter. Fan Kuan we don't know. Did he work for anybody? Unfortunately, we know so little about most of the painters. Guo Xi is one of the exceptions. So at this time, many of the painters were professional painters who worked for important patrons like the emperor. Guo Xi, we know a lot about records he's painted. He was contracted to paint landscape murals of imperial palace buildings, lots of screens. None of this survives. There's some interesting stories, too, of him working. One case, although he's not the only painter who's described as doing this. Whereas a plastered wall, it's got rough plaster, and he says leave it rough. And then, he takes rags dipped in ink washes, and he just brushes the whole wall. And then the witnesses say, wow, magically before our eyes, we see this whole world of peaks and waterfalls and streams emerge and so on. Yes, there emerges a hierarchy value. The 10th and 11th century is the moment when this kind of painting, landscape painting, emerges into prominence. Prior to that, the prominent sorts of subjects were figure paintings of various kinds. Buddhist paintings, Daoist religious images, and Confucian sages. There's a didactic component that's important to the figure painting. Certain kinds of narratives, whether they're poetic or they're didactic or whatnot. A lot of these paintings, unfortunately, don't survive. But we have records of them, written records, that tell us. So 10th or 11th century is the moment when landscape painting emerges as becoming, perhaps for a while anyway, the most important subject matter for painters. Still life isn't a subject matter in China. There are other kinds of images of flowers and so on and so forth. And actually in the 11th century is when they start to emerge, also, is important. But none of those painting survive. Generally, you have imperial court painters who are painting some of these. Bamboo in a grand scale and birds and flowers for special occasions and whatnot. So those are also important in this period. But then you also have the scholar officials of the 11th century are serving in the imperial government. Not as painters, not as artists. But they're also formulating their own aesthetic. They 're the ones who start to paint on paper, focusing on smaller, more intimate images. Also with ink with a little color, bamboo, plum blossoms, and things like that. They're actually-- because they're also the art writers there, the history of that tradition becomes dominant. In actual practice, on the other hand, historically, the scholar officials are competing with a market for other kinds of painting which are far more popular. They're never really written out until you get to the 17th century, and you get things like the Mustard Seed Garden Manuel and that sort of thing. But even then, that's not quite the same thing as what I'm doing. But there's this notion of, you can learn how to paint by mastering all these patterns. But that's already a culmination of something that's happening in the Ming dynasty where this is pastiche. And the better artists, all these references to the past, and to poetry, and so on and so forth. But what I've laid out here, you will not find written anywhere in any primary source text. Or even any secondary source text. Nobody else is writing about this sort of thing. It's thinking about individuation from the autonomous individual. But basically, a chorus of musicians is made up of particular individuals. A choir singing is that particular choir singing that particular music at that particular moment. And it sounds that way because those particular people are singing it. Right? So it's not that this is a tradition about erasing the uniqueness of people. It's actually about-- people were saying last night-- this is actually the uniqueness of who you are contributes to this. It's Guo Xi's contributing and being part of this continuous fabric. And the continuous fabric is alive by virtue of the uniqueness of the persons who constitute it. And that's really what that mountain is. That particular painting, that particular mountain is those particular events that are happening together. So it's not that. And so it isn't contradictory. It seems that way because this is how we often read China. So China's all about-- look at the architecture, the copying of the masters, faithful to the repetition of tradition. There's no room for individuality. But at least ideally, the individual counts for everything. Because you can't have a group without its individuals. You can't have China without its unique individuals participating. That's what life is. So all of us working together in our particularity, offering our particular contributions to each other, and allowing each other to offer our differences and particularities to us. And that's collaboration. And that's really what Chinese art, in its ideal practice, is about. All right. I think that's it. Well, thank you very much.
B1 US painting mountain yin landscape guo detail Stanley Murashige at PCC Part 2 "Chinese Painting and Calligraphy...." 58 2 Li Rose posted on 2019/06/12 More Share Save Report Video vocabulary