Canada's most persistent piece of fake news.

It comes from a 2004 letter to the editor

printed in The Toronto Star.

It says refugees in Canada receive more money

from the government than retired citizens.

It's not true.

In fact, a retired Canadian is eligible for about double

what a refugee gets,

depending on the province.

But you can still find the falsehood circulating online,

even though The Star and the Canadian government

debunked it.

[loud buzzer]

You should also know that Jagmeet Singh

is not wanted for terrorism in 15 countries.

Nor did the mayor of Dorval, Quebec

stand up to Muslim families

who asked to take pork off school menus.

He didn't do that. They never asked.

And this website that looks like a local Quebec news site,

it's actually an advertising revenue scheme

based in Ukraine.

[wings flapping]

All of this fake news seems to unravel

with just a little bit of digging.

So why do people keep falling for it,

and how can you better spot it?

♪ [theme]

First, let's get clear about the definition.

[tv static]

This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration,

period.

Vassy: Fake news has been used to describe everything from

political spin to pranks to conspiracy theories,

even to media outlets politicians don't like.

You are fake news.

I like real news, not fake news. You're fake news.

The fake news, the enemy of the people.

That's why researchers say we should stop using those words,

and instead, say "misinformation",

or "disinformation".

They define disinformation as the deliberate creation

or sharing of false information to mislead people.

Misinformation is the act of sharing information

without realizing it's wrong.

Whether it's a headline designed to sway opinions,

make money, or it's simply just misconstrued,

sharing this stuff can have real consequences.

Misleading social posts shared in 2017,

encouraged Haitian asylum seekers to try and cross

in to Canada from the U.S.

WhatsApp messages like this one said

Canada had invited all Haitian nationals in the U.S.

to apply for residency.

It wasn't true, but for people facing

possible deportation back to Haiti,

it was something they wanted to hear.

Researchers say there are a ton of reasons

people share fake news.

Some are just sharing stuff that they agree with.

Some are deliberately making trouble.

Others just don't know what they're sharing is false.

Gordon: I do research on human reasoning/decision making.

I research, essentially, the science of human study.

Vassy: Gordon Pennycook says social media platforms

prime people to be, quote, "lazy thinkers".

Gordon: Mostly, it's just, you know, pictures of dogs

and babies, and -- [chuckling]

-- and things like that.

And you might come across a news article,

but you're not really in the sort of mode

that you ought to be in when you're engaging with --

with actual news content.

Vassy: Among other things, his research looked at the effect

of repeat exposure.

Gordon: We basically showed people fake news headlines

in the format that they would be on social media,

and what we showed is that a single prior exposure

to a fake news headline

increases later belief in that headline,

regardless of whether the person remembers having seen it before.

Now consider the convincing nature of a video clip.

Check out this moment between Prime Minister Trudeau

and Brazil's President Bolsonaro at the G20.

Clips of it started circulating online

with partisan groups saying it showed

"awkward and pathetic Trudeau being snubbed

on the world stage".

Global News tried to clarify the disinformation

by tweeting a longer version of the video showing

the two men did, in fact, shake hands.

But you'll notice that the correct information

didn't spread as far as the disinformation.

And that, experts will tell you,

is what's wrong with social media.

Ultimately, it's calibrated for engagement

so that, um, the more people are enraged and engaged,

and ultimately, divided on these sites,

the more they use them,

and the more they post, and the more they share,

which is ultimately good for the platforms --

the business model of the platforms.

Vassy: Taylor Owen studies

the political impact of digital technology

at McGill University.

He says people should be sceptical of content

that makes them angry,

especially during an election year.

Taylor: Pipelines, reconciliation,

immigration, these things that we already know

are in the popular debate,

how are they being amplified,

how are they being torqued

by people trying to divide us against each other?

So what else can you do to prevent falling

for disinformation?

Well, be sceptical of what you see online.

Read the whole article.

Sometimes that sensational headline doesn't match

the body of the story.

Ask yourself, "Is the author or organization familiar to you?

Are they reputable?

Are other reputable outlets reporting the story too?

Look at the url.

If the content is imitating a legitimate site,

the branding might might match, but the urls won't.

If you really want to dig,

try a Google reverse image search of photos in the story.

And if you see something that's fake or misleading,

report it to the platform you saw it on.

But here's the problem,

not everyone has the time, skill, or will

to do this kind of sleuthing.

It's not just not knowing that much about the world,

you know, it's not like ignorance,

it's just not being, kind of, willing to think about things

which is a different sort of stupidity.

So what's the solution?

Well, there's no single easy answer.

Fact checking has the potential to be a really helpful

and powerful medium.

So holding politicians to account for the incorrect

things that they say.

Vassy: Jason Reifler studies public opinion

and political psychology

at the University of Exeter in the UK.

He says news organizations, journalists,

and social media platforms all have a role in preventing

the spread of disinformation.

But studies show little things you do can help too.

On the individual basis, calling our friends and relatives out,

in a nice, you know,

not in to what starts as a huge political argument,

but just pointing out when they're saying things

that aren't correct.

But that can have a beneficial effect.

As the world gets bigger, and more connected,

we need that sense of-- of intimacy more than--

more than ever.

Vassy: Facebook says it's employed fact checkers,

and moderators,

and will take down accounts

that try to interfere with the election.

Plus, governments around the world have been turning up

the pressure on companies, like Facebook, to do more.

The platforms are failing their users.

Vassy: Canada has also signalled it's considering penalties

for tech platforms that don't clamp down on disinformation.

And if they don't, we will hold them to account,

and there will be meaningful, financial consequences.

Vassy: But they haven't acted specifically on that.

♪ ♪