>> Sean: RIGHT NOW, FOR MORE

REACTION ON TONIGHT'S BIG

BREAKING NEWS THAT THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL HOROWITZ HAS SUBMITTED

HIS FISA REPORT FOR

CLASSIFICATION REVIEW TO THE

DOJ, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR FORMER

CONGRESSMAN TREY GOWDY.

YOU FIRST SAID -- AND I'LL GET

TO THIS IN A SECOND, THAT THE

IDEA THAT NOW McCABE, THEY

PASSED ON ANY SPECIAL TREATMENT,

BUT IT WAS A WHILE AGO THAT

REPORT IDENTIFIED THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL REPORT IDENTIFIED HIM AS

A LIAR AND A LEAKER.

AND YOU SAID IT'S A CELEBRATION

OF OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.

NOW, WE HAVE THE SECOND MINOR

REPORT.

THAT WAS COMEY LACKING CANDOR.

BUT THAT DIDN'T RESULT IN --

WELL, IT DID RESULT IN A

REFERRAL, BUT IT DID SEEM LIKE

THEY'RE MOVING FORWARD.

WHY IS THIS TAKING SO LONG.

WE'LL GET TO FISA NEXT.

BECAUSE I HAVE SOME CONCERNS

ABOUT WHAT THE OUTCOME WILL BE.

>> UH YOU KNOW, SEAN, THERE WAS

A TRIAL IN DC, WHAT, LAST WEEK?

AND FORMER WHITE HOUSE COUNCIL

GREG CRAIG WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY

IN WHAT WAS A REALLY QUICK JURY

VERDICT.

THESE ARE TOUGH CASES.

IT IS HARDER THAN IT MIGHT

APPEAR TO CONVINCE 12 PEOPLE OF

ANYTHING.

I USED TO HAVE TO DO IT FOR A

LIVING.

IT'S TOUGH.

YOU HAVE TO DOT EVERY I AND

CROSS EVERY T, IT'S MORE

DIFFICULT IF IT'S A HIGH-PROFILE

DEFENDANT.

SO IF THEY GO FORWARD WITH

McCABE, YOU CAN REST-ASSURED,

THAT'S GOING TO BE A TOUGH

TRIAL.

WE DON'T WANT THE UNITED STATES

GOVERNMENT GOING TRIAL AND

LOSING.

THEY LOST TO GREG CRAIG.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO GO TO TRIAL,

YOU NEED TO WIN.

>> Sean: YOU NEVER LOST A CASE

AS A PROSECUTOR.

THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SO GOOD AT

WHAT YOU DO.

HERE'S MY QUESTION.

WE NOW KNOW -- I CAN GIVE YOU --

AS IT RELATES TO FISA AND THE

INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT, I KNOW

OF THREE SEPARATE TIME,

INCLUDING, BY THE WAY, THE UK

MEMO WARNING ABOUT STEELE'S

CREDIBILITY.

WE KNOW THREE SEPARATE INSTANCES

BEFORE THE FISA WAS SIGNED, THE

BULK OF INFORMATION WE NOW KNOW

IS THE UNVERIFIED DIRTY RUSSIAN

DOSSIER, LIKELY RUSSIAN

DISINFORMATION ACCORDING TO THE

NEW YORK TIMES FROM THE GET-GO,

BUT THEY WERE WARNED ABOUT

STEELE'S CREDIBILITY BEFORE THEY

SIGNED THE FIRST FISA.

THEY WERE WARNED BY BRUCE SWORD.

THE UK WAS WARNING ABOUT HIS

CREDIBILITY.

THAT STEELE HAD AN AGENDA, IT

WASN'T VERIFIED.

AND HILLARY PAID FOR IT.

THEY USED IT ANYWAY.

NOW WE KNOW IT'S UNVERIFIABLE,

BECAUSE STEELE NEVER STOOD BY

HIS OWN DOSSIER AND UNDER OATH

SAID I HAVE NO IDEA IF ANY OF IT

IS TRUE.

TO ME, THAT SEEMS LIKE

PREMEDITATED FRAUD ON FISA

COURT.

WHEN YOU COUPLE THAT WITH ANDREW

McCABE, THE DEPUTY FBI DIRECTOR

SAYING NO FISA WARRANT, THAT

MAKES ME THINK THEY DIDN'T CARE

ABOUT WHAT THEY WERE PRESENTING

TO THE COURT.

AND THAT WAS A FRAUD AND THEY

KNEW IT WAS A FRAUD, BUT THEY

SAID IT WAS VERIFIED AND IT

WASN'T.

>> LET'S ASSUME FOR THE SAKE OF

ARGUMENT THAT EVERYTHING YOU SAY

IS TRUE.

LET'S ASSUME THAT.

YOU STILL HAVE TO FIND A FEDERAL

STATUTE IF YOUR OBJECTIVE IS

INDICTMENT.

I'M VERY CLEAR EVERY TIME YOU'RE

GOOD ENOUGH TO HAVE ME ON, WE

CANNOT HAVE A SOCIETY WHERE

INDICTMENT IS THE ONLY THING

THAT CARRIES WITH IT ANY STIGMA.

MOST OF THE NAMES INVOLVED IN

THE 2016 HAVE BEEN FIRED OR

PUBLICLY CALLED TO TASK.

KEEP IN MIND, JIM COMEY TWICE

NOW, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL SAID

YOU DID NOT MEET OUR

EXPECTATIONS.

YOU FAILED TO FOLLOW POLICY.

YOU VIOLATED YOUR EMPLOYEE

AGREEMENT.

ALL OF THAT HAS TO BE

SIGNIFICANT.

LOOK, I USED TO MAKE

REPRESENTATIONS IN FRONT OF THE

COURT.

I TRIED TO BE HONEST AND FAIR

ABOUT IT.

BUT LET'S ASSUME I DIDN'T TELL

THE COURT SOMETHING.

THE REMEDY FOR ME IS NOT

INDICTMENT, THE REMEDY IS I MAY

LOSE MY LAW LICENSE.

THE REMEDY IS THE COURT MAY HOLD

ME IN CONTEMPT.

>> HERE'S THE THING.

IF I AM WARNED SOMETHING THAT

I'M ABOUT TO PRESENT IN COURT IS

FALSE AND AT THE TOP OF AN

APPLICATION OF MAKING IT TO THE

COURT, IT SAYS VERIFIED.

I TEST IT.

I SIGN IT, SAY IT'S VERIFIED AND

I'M WARNED THAT IT ISN'T.

WHEN THE FBI GOT INTO THEIR

SPREAD SHEET, THEY DISCOVERED

95% OF THE DIRTY DOSSIER WAS UP

TRUE.

THAT'S LATER, THOUGH.

IF I KNOW --

>> IF IT'S ON A SPREAD SHEET.

>> IF I KNOW IT'S NOT VERIFIED

AND I PRESENT IT AS VERIFIED AND

IT'S UNVERIFIABLE, THAT WOULD

SEEM LIKE SEAN HANNITY WENT TO

THE COURT AND COMMITTED A FRAUD

IN THE COURT CONSCIOUSLY FOR THE

PURPOSE OF ACHIEVING A POLITICAL

AGENDA.

WHY DO I THINK TREY GAODY, AS

GREAT AN ATTORNEY AS YOU ARE,

NEVER LOST A CASE AS A

PROSECUTOR, THAT I WOULD GO TO

JAIL?

>> IF YOU'RE A LAWYER, YOU CAN

LOSE YOUR LAW LICENSE.

THE COURT CAN HOLD YOU IN

CONTEMPT.

>> Sean: IF YOU LIE BEFORE A

JUDGE?

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT LYING BEFORE

A JUDGE.

>> YOU'LL BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF

COURT.

ABSOLUTELY.

YOU CAN GO TO JAIL FOR THAT.

I DON'T KNOW THAT LAWYERS WHO

MAKE FACTUAL MISREPRESENTATIONS

IN FRONT OF JUDGES WIND UP

GETTING INDICTED.

YOU'RE GOING TO GET PUNISHED.

YOU'RE GOING BE HELD IN

CONTEMPT.

YOU MAY BE GET SENT TO PRISON.

LOOK -- I'M NOT MINIMIZING

ANYTHING OF WHAT THEY'VE DONE.

WE'VE GOT TO ASK THE RIGHT

PUNISHMENT TO THE RIGHT OFFENSE.

>> Sean: BUT YOU'RE DENYING BY

SIGNING THAT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN

THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

YOU'RE LITERALLY USING THAT LIE

TO SPY ON A PRESIDENTIAL

CAMPAIGN AND TRANSITION.

>> WE IDENTIFIED THE STATUTE,

USING THE COLOR OF A GOVERNMENT

OFFICIAL, IT COULD BE A 1983

ACTION.

THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING.

WE HAVE TO MATCH UP THE CONDUCT

WITH A SPECIFIC CODE VIOLATION.

>> REGULARLY --

>> WITH AN VIOLATION.

NOW WE'RE GETTING SOMEWHERE.

>> I'LL SEND YOU GREG JARRETT'S

LIST.

HE'S IDENTIFIED A WHOLE VARIETY

OF CRIMES PERPETRATING A FRAUD

ON THE COURT.

>> DON'T SEND IT TO ME, SEND IT

TO BILL BARR.

NOTHING I CAN DO ABOUT IT RIGHT

NOW.

>> DO YOU HAVE HIS E-MAIL.

I DON'T KNOW BILL BARR.