WITH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER.

WE WOULD LIKE TO.

BUT I'M SURE THE WHISTLE-BLOWER

HAS CONCERNS THAT HE HAS BEEN

ADVISED AS THE LAW REQUIRED BY

THE INVESTOR GENERAL OR THE

DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL AND TERRAN

RELIGIONS JUST TO HOW HE'S TO

COMMUNICATE WITH CONGRESS.

AND SO THE REST OF THE

WHISTLE-BLOWER IS RETALIATION.

>> Martha: THE COMMENTS FROM

ADAM SCHIFF A FEW WEEKS BACK

LANDING

TO THE HOUSE INTEL CHAIR AND SM

TO THE HOUSE INTEL CHAIR AND SE

HOT WATER.

"THE WASHINGTON POST" GIVE THEM

FOUR PINOCCHIOS BY CLAIMING

ASKING IF THE PUBLIC CANNOT

TRUST MR. SCHIFF TO BE HONEST ON

THE ORIGINS OF HIS INFORMATION,

WHY SHOULD HE TRUST THE CLAIM

THAT THE INFORMATION ITSELF IS

SERIOUS.

HERE NOW, TREY GOWDY.

FORMER HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

CHAIRMAN AND A FOX NEWS

CONTRIBUTOR.

GOOD EVENING TO YOU.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE FOUR

PINOCCHIOS?

>> I THINK HE GOT FOUR BECAUSE

YOU CANNOT GET FIVE FOR HE GOT

THE MAXIMUM SENATE YOU CAN GET

AND DO YOU KNOW HOW HARD THAT

WAS FOR "THE WASHINGTON POST"?

TO GIVE ADAM SCHIFF FOUR

PINOCCHIO'S?

>> Martha: THEY DID TO THEIR

CREDIT.

THAT'S

>>

THAT'S THE SECOND SOUND OF THE

APOCALYPSE.

I'VE GOT TO GET MY AFFAIRS AND

ORDER.

HE'S ALSO A CAREER OFFENDER,

MARTHA.

A SAME GUY WHO HAD THE PARITY,

WEEK OR SO AGO, TO HAVE MUELLER

THAT MUELLER COULDN'T FIND.

HOW LONG IS SPEAKER PELOSI GOING

TO PUT UP WITH ADAM IS HANDLING

THIS INVESTIGATION.

HERE IS HE TAKING IT AWAY FROM

JERRY NADLER.

I'M SURE THE GUYS AND GALS ARE

NOT HAPPY.

IF YOU ARE GOING TO DO IT, DON'T

MAKE STUFF UP, ADAM.

HE IS IN THE EVIDENTIARY CHAIN

WHAT HAPPENED WITH THIS WAS A

BLOWER AND I HOPE THE

REPUBLICANS MAKE HIM TESTIFY.

>> HE EASILY COULD'VE ANSWERED

THE QUESTION EASILY AND SAY YES,

HE CONTACTED US, HERDED THROUGH

THE PROPER CHANNELS.

WHY DO YOU THINK HE DIDN'T?

DOES IT SAY SOMETHING ABOUT

DEEPER INVOLVEMENT ON HIS PART?

WHAT DOES THAT REVEAL, THAT HE

WASN'T WILLING TO SAY THAT, I

WONDER?

>> IN THE WORDS OF PATTI

LOVELESS, HE'S GOT A LITTLE

TROUBLE WITH THE TRUTH.

WHY DOES ANYBODY LIE, THEY ARE

AFRAID THE TRUTH IS GOING TO GET

THEM IN TROUBLE.

SCHIFF HAS RECEIVED A PASS --

THE WHOLE TIME I WAS IN

CONGRESS, I DON'T EVER REMEMBER

A NEGATIVE WORD ABOUT HIM.

I MEMBER HIM COMPLAINING

REPUBLICANS WOULD MEET WITH

WHISTLE-BLOWERS.

I WOULD REMEMBER HIM COMPLAINING

WHEN THE REPUBLICANS WOULDN'T

MEET WITH WITNESSES THAT HE

WASN'T PRESENT.

THE THIRD MISTAKE HE'S MADE --

MAY BE THE MOST MAJOR

INVESTIGATION HE'S EVER GOING TO

BE PART OF.

I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG

NANCY PELOSI IS GOING TO PUT UP

WITH THIS.

>> Martha: WHAT'S THE IMPACT

OF THAT?

WHAT'S THE IMPACT OF THE CASE?

THE LEAD PERSON ON THIS IS

MAKING THESE MISSTEPS.

HOW IMPORTANT IS IT FOR THE BIG

PICTURE?

>> HOW BAD WAS IT WHEN

MARK FUHRMAN INVESTIGATED IN

O.J. SIMPSON'S MURDER?

THE -- I'M NOT PREJUDGING

MARK FUHRMAN, BUT I AM

PREJUDGING PETER STRZOK.

FOR ANYONE WHO WONDERED IF ADAM

SCHIFF CAN BE DISPASSIONATE, I

NEVER WANTED THAT.

BUT IF ANY OF YOUR VIEWERS DID,

HE MAKES UP FACTS AND OPENINGS,

WITH THE TRUTH WOULD'VE SERVED

HIM JUST FINE.

HE JUST DECIDED TO LIE ABOUT IT.

>> Martha: THIS IS A PIECE OF

SOUND FROM SUSAN RICE WHO SAYS

THERE IS AN ATTACK ON DEMOCRACY

COMING FROM

1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

LISTEN TO THIS AND I WANT TO GET

YOUR OPINION ON IT.

>> FOR THE FIRST TIME I CAN

REMEMBER, OUR COUNTRY IS IN

EFFECT UNDER ATTACK.

>> YOU WRITE THAT IN YOUR BOOK,

YOU BELIEVE.

>> THE ATTACK IS COMING FROM

WITHIN.

IT'S COMING FROM

1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

FOR ALL THE SECURITY THREATS I

SAW AS NATIONAL SECURITY

ADVISOR, ALL THE CHALLENGES WE

FACE, I NEVER THOUGHT I'D SEE

THAT.

>> Martha: WHAT DO YOU THINK

OF THAT?

>> I THINK THAT MIGHT BE THE

SAME SUSAN RICE WHO WENT ON THE

FOX MORNING TALK SHOWS TO BOTCH

EVERY SINGLE FACT WHAT HAPPENED

IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA.

I THINK IT'S THE SAME SUSAN RICE

WHO THREATENED TO RUN AGAINST

SUSAN COLLINS BECAUSE SHE HAD

THE UNMITIGATED TEMERITY TO VOTE

FOR BRETT KAVANAUGH FOR U.S.

SUPREME COURT.

THE BIGGEST THREAT TO OUR

DEMOCRACY IS WHEN PEOPLE WHO

DON'T LIKE TRUMP AND DIDN'T VOTE

FOR HIM WANT TO UNDERMINE AND

REVERSE ELECTION RESULTS.

THAT'S WHAT'S GOING TO DO WITH

SIN AS A REPUBLICAN.

LOOK, SHE DIDN'T VOTE FOR TRUMP.

SHE DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM, BUT YOU

STILL HAVE TO RESPECT THE FACT

THAT LOTS AND LOTS OF PEOPLE DID

AND HE WON THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

TO SAY THAT'S A THREAT TO

DEMOCRACY AND THAT YOU HAPPEN TO

DISAGREE WITH SOMEONE?

YOU UNDERMINE THE ELECTION TO

GET RID OF SOMEONE SIMPLY