Subtitles section Play video Print subtitles WHISTLEBLOWER. >> Bret: THANK YOU. LET'S HEAR MORE ABOUT WHY THE WHISTLEBLOWER'S NAME SHOULD BE OUT. THERE KENTUCKY SENATOR RAND PAUL JOINS US TONIGHT. I REFERENCED THAT TWEET FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER'S ATTORNEY. IF CONGRESS AND OTHERS DON'T PROTECT MY CLIENT'S, IT JEOPARDIZED THE ENTIRE SYSTEM. YOUR RESPONSE? >> I DON'T WISH HARM ON ANYONE. I HAVE BEEN THE VICTIM OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE TWICE. I WAS AT THE BALLFIELD WHEN SCALIA WAS ALMOST KILLED AND I HAD SIX OF MY RIBS BROKEN BY A HATER OF PRESIDENT TRUMP. I DON'T WANT VIOLENCE. THE REPORT IS NOT CORRECT. THE STATUTE SAYS THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CANNOT REVEAL THE NAME. THE PRESIDENT SHOULD ENFORCE THE LAW BUT THE STATUTE SAYS THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CAN'T REVEAL THE NAME. THERE IS NOTHING THAT PREVENTS ME FROM SAYING IT NOW BUT I WANT IT TO BE MORE ABOUT THE PROCESS AND LESS ABOUT THE PERSON. THERE IS NO LAW THAT PREVENTS ME FROM MENTIONING THE NAME. >> Bret: DO YOU KNOW? >> YES, THE 6th AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION SAYS IF YOU ACCUSY ME OF A CRIME I GET TO STARE YOU DOWN IN COURT. IF THERE IS A TRIAL, YOU ALWAYS GET TO CONFRONT YOUR ACCUSER. IT'S IN THE 6th AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RITZ. >> Bret: WHAT PREVENTS YOU FROM GETTING ON THE SENATE FLOOR AND GIVING A SPEECH AND SAYING THE GUY'S NAME? >> I KNOW I CAN AND I MAY. I COULD DO IT RIGHT NOW. NOTHING STOPS ME. THERE IS NO LAW THAT STOPS ME FROM DOING IT. OTHER THAN I DON'T WANT TO MAKE IT ABOUT THE ONE INDIVIDUAL. I DO THINK THAT THIS INDIVIDUAL IS A MATERIAL WITNESS TO THE POTENTIAL BIDEN CORRUPTION. HE WAS THERE UNDER JOE BIDEN. HE WAS THERE WHEN JOE BIDEN WAS TRYING TO FIRE THE PROSECUTOR THAT WAS INVESTIGATING HUNTER BIDEN. THIS PERSON WAS A UKRAINE EXPERT ON THE DESK. HE SHOULD BE INTERVIEWED NOT AS THE WHISTLEBLOWER BUT A MATERIAL WITNESS TO THE BIDEN CONSTRUCTION. >> Bret: CRITICS SAY NOW WE ARE WHERE WE ARE. YOU HAVE FORMER OR CURRENT AMBASSADOR SONLAND WITH THE TRANSCRIPT THAT IS RELEASED WHO CHANGED HIS TESTIMONY. HE SAID THERE WAS QUID PRO QUO AS FAR AS MILITARY AID BEING WITH HELD. YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE PROCESS HOWLY GOT HERE RATHER THAN THE SUBSTANCE WHERE WE ARE. >> SORT OF. BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT ANOTHER SUBJECT. I THINK THE WHISTLEBLOWER IS A MATERIAL WITNESS TO THE BIDEN CORRUPTION. HE WAS THERE WHEN THE BIDEN CORRUPTION SCANDAL WAS GOING ON. THERE ARE REPORTS THAT ARE AIDS TO JOE BIDEN WHO COUNSELLED IT WAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR HIS SON TO MAKE MONEY. THE WHISTLEBLOWER WAS THERE. WHAT DID THE WHISTLEBLOWER THINK AND SAY TO JOE BIDEN ABOUT THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH HUNTER? HE NEEDS TO BE INTERVIEWED FOR THAT PURPOSE ALONE. ALSO THE PRESIDENT'S DEFENSE BECAUSE OF THE 6th MEANT TO THE CONSTITUTION WILL GET TO CONFRONT HIM. NO JUDGE WILL TURN THAT DOWN. HE WILL GET TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSER. >> Bret: BUT THE SUBSTANCE OF WHERE WE ARE NOW? DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH WHAT YOU HEARD ABOUT THE PHONE CALL AND THE FALLOUT? >> THE ONLY THING I DISCOVERED AFTER LOOKING AT BOTH SIDES IS THAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO INFLUENCE THE AID TO UKRAINE. BIDEN SAID WE WILL CUT IT OFF. MENENDEZ SAID IF YOU DON'T KEEP INVESTIGATING TRUMP WE WILL SCUT YOUR AID. MURPH SAID IF YOU INVESTIGATE HUNTER BIDEN WE WILL GET RID OF YOUR AID. I WOULD SAY YOU DON'T GET ANY BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ANY MONEY. >> Bret: WHAT ABOUT THE CONCERN ABOUT PROTECTING WHISTLEBLOWERS OVERALL IF YOU NAME THIS PERSON JEOPARDIZED OTHER THINGS. IN 2014 CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY FOUNDED BY YOUR DAD. YOU SAID WE HAVE SO MANY MILLIONS OF GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS WHEN THEY SEE SOMETHING WRONG THEY SHOULD REPORT IT WITHOUT REPERCUSSIONS. YOUR DAD SHOULD WE SHOULD PRAISE OUR WHISTLEBLOWERS? >> ABSOLUTELY. >> Bret: SO WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS? >> WE WERE DEFEND SNOWDEN WHO I THINK HE SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN WHISTLEBLOWER STATUS. MOST OF THE PEOPLE DEFENDING THE CURRENT WHISTLEBLOWER WANTED TO EXECUTE SHOWDEN. I WANT SNOWDEN PROTECTED SO HE IS NOT EXECUTED. >> Bret: WHAT ABOUT THIS GUY? >> I DON'T WANT HIM EXECUTED OR FIRED. IT'S A PROTECTION FROM BEING FIRED AND NOT A PROTECTION TO BE ANONYMOUS PARTICULARLY FOR A CRIMINAL CASE. ONCE YOU HAVE A CRIME THERE IS A CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION YOU HAVE TO CONFRONT YOUR ACCUSER. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS TO. THAT NO COURT IN THE LAND WILL LET THERE BE A TRIAL OF PRESIDENT TRUMP WITHOUT HIM CONFRONTING HIS ACCUSERS. YOU SHOULD NOT BE FIRED AND THIS PERSON SHOULD NOT ARE PUT IN JAIL. BUT HE SHOULD COME FORWARD LIKE SNOWDEN AND REVEAL HIMSELF. >> Bret: YOU AGREE WITH LINDSEY GRAHAM ON SOMETHING? >> YES, IT DOESN'T HAPPEN EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK. >> Bret: WHERE DO YOU THINK THIS GOES? IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S HEADING TO AN IMPEACHMENT VOTE IN THE HOUSE. THEN HEAD YOUR WAY TO THE SENATE? >> I THINK IT WILL BE PARTISAN. IN THE HOUSE NO REPUBLICANS VOTED FOR THIS. I THINK NO REPUBLICANS WILL VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT. IN THE SENATE I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY SENATOR THAT WILL VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT. I THINK IN THE END THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL SAY WE SHOULD BE FAIR. BOTHEDS HAVE TRIED TO INFLUENCE THE AID IN UKRAINE. WHY SHOULD WE GIVE JOE BIDEN AND
B1 FoxNews bret whistleblower biden confront aid Rand Paul: No law stops me from saying whistleblower's name 2 0 林宜悉 posted on 2019/11/11 More Share Save Report Video vocabulary