THAT'S MORE LIKE A MONARCHY. NOT SOMEBODY SAYING THEY CAN

NOT SOMEBODY SAYING THEY CAN FIRE A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IF

FIRE A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IF THEY WANT TO.

THEY WANT TO. REGARDING TREASON, THE

REGARDING TREASON, THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF SAYS, YOU

CONSTITUTION ITSELF SAYS, YOU GOT TO HAVE TWO WITNESSES.

GOT TO HAVE TWO WITNESSES. THAT'S NOT HEARSAY WITNESSES.

THAT'S NOT HEARSAY WITNESSES. NONE OF THIS STUFF THAT WOULDN'T

NONE OF THIS STUFF THAT WOULDN'T BE ADMISSIBLE IN ANY DECENT

BE ADMISSIBLE IN ANY DECENT COURT.

COURT. NO, THAT'S TWO DIRECT EVIDENCE

NO, THAT'S TWO DIRECT EVIDENCE WITNESSES THAT CAN COME IN AND

WITNESSES THAT CAN COME IN AND POSITIVELY IDENTIFY THEMSELVES,

POSITIVELY IDENTIFY THEMSELVES, NOT SOMETHING THEY OVERHEARD.

NOT SOMETHING THEY OVERHEARD. BUT ACTUALLY BE WITNESSES TO

BUT ACTUALLY BE WITNESSES TO TREASON.

TREASON. AND THIS GROUP COMES IN HERE,

AND THIS GROUP COMES IN HERE, THEY TOSS TREASON OUT IN A

THEY TOSS TREASON OUT IN A REPORT LIKE IT'S NO BIG DEAL.

REPORT LIKE IT'S NO BIG DEAL. WE CAN BRING IN A BUNCH OF

WE CAN BRING IN A BUNCH OF HEARSAY WITNESSES AND THEN WE'LL

HEARSAY WITNESSES AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE LAWYERS TESTIFY AND

HAVE THE LAWYERS TESTIFY AND THEN THROW A PRESIDENT OUT OF

THEN THROW A PRESIDENT OUT OF OFFICE.

OFFICE. IT'S SO ABSURD.

IT'S SO ABSURD. IT'S SO ABSURD.

IT'S SO ABSURD. NOW, WE HAVE A WITNESS COME IN

NOW, WE HAVE A WITNESS COME IN AND WE'RE TOLD HE'S GOING TO BE

AND WE'RE TOLD HE'S GOING TO BE A WITNESS.

A WITNESS. THAT'S WHY HE DOESN'T HAVE TO

THAT'S WHY HE DOESN'T HAVE TO FOLLOW UNDER THE RULES OF

FOLLOW UNDER THE RULES OF DECORUM.

DECORUM. AND THEN, I'VE NEVER SEEN THIS,

AND THEN, I'VE NEVER SEEN THIS, HE GETS TO COME UP AND GRILL HIS

HE GETS TO COME UP AND GRILL HIS OPPOSING ADVERSARY WITNESS.

OPPOSING ADVERSARY WITNESS. I FEEL LIKE TO BE FAIR, IF WE

I FEEL LIKE TO BE FAIR, IF WE WERE GOING TO MAKE THIS THING

WERE GOING TO MAKE THIS THING FAIR, MR. CASTOR WOULD BE ABLE

FAIR, MR. CASTOR WOULD BE ABLE TO COME UP AND GRILL MR. BERKE.

TO COME UP AND GRILL MR. BERKE. BUT THIS ISN'T ABOUT BEING FAIR.

BUT THIS ISN'T ABOUT BEING FAIR. THIS ISN'T ABOUT DUE PROCESS.

THIS ISN'T ABOUT DUE PROCESS. THIS IS ABOUT A KANGAROO SYSTEM.

THIS IS ABOUT A KANGAROO SYSTEM. LET ME TELL YOU, THOSE THAT

LET ME TELL YOU, THOSE THAT THING YOU'VE DONE SOMETHING

THING YOU'VE DONE SOMETHING SPECIAL HERE, YOU HAVE SET THE

SPECIAL HERE, YOU HAVE SET THE BAR SO LOW, I'M AFRAID IT'S

BAR SO LOW, I'M AFRAID IT'S IRREPARABLE.

IRREPARABLE. WE'VE HAD PEOPLE MENTION, THE

WE'VE HAD PEOPLE MENTION, THE NEXT PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN, GEE,

NEXT PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN, GEE, HE MAY BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT.

HE MAY BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT. WELL, WIE ALREADY GOT THE FORMS.

WELL, WIE ALREADY GOT THE FORMS. ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS ELIMINATE

ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS ELIMINATE DONALD TRUMP'S NAME AND PUT JOE

DONALD TRUMP'S NAME AND PUT JOE BIDEN'S NAME IN THERE BECAUSE

BIDEN'S NAME IN THERE BECAUSE HE'S ON VIDEO.

HE'S ON VIDEO. HE BASICALLY HAS ADMITTED TO THE

HE BASICALLY HAS ADMITTED TO THE CRIME THAT'S BEING HOISTED ON

CRIME THAT'S BEING HOISTED ON THE PRESIDENT IMPROPERLY.

THE PRESIDENT IMPROPERLY. SO I'M SCARED FOR MY COUNTRY

SO I'M SCARED FOR MY COUNTRY BECAUSE I'VE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING

BECAUSE I'VE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS.

LIKE THIS. THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE

THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE CONGRESS.

CONGRESS. I CAME UP HERE FROM A COURT

I CAME UP HERE FROM A COURT WHERE WE HAD SXORDZ RULES AND

WHERE WE HAD SXORDZ RULES AND I'VE SEEN NOTHING OF THE KIND IN

I'VE SEEN NOTHING OF THE KIND IN HERE TODAY.

HERE TODAY. AND IT'S OUTRAGEOUS THAT WE'RE

AND IT'S OUTRAGEOUS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REMOVE A PRESIDENT

TRYING TO REMOVE A PRESIDENT WITH A KANGAROO COURT LIKE THIS.

WITH A KANGAROO COURT LIKE THIS. I YIELD BACK.

I YIELD BACK. >> IF I COULD JUST CLARIFY.

>> IF I COULD JUST CLARIFY. TREASON IS NOT IN OUR REPORT.

TREASON IS NOT IN OUR REPORT. >> THE GENTLEMAN YIELDED BACK.

>> THE GENTLEMAN YIELDED BACK. >> YEAH, AND IT IS MENTIONED IN