DEVIN NUNES, I CAN'T MENTION

THEM ALL, RADCLIFFE.

HERE WITH REACTION FORMER HOUSE

OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN,

FORMER STATE AND FEDERAL

PROSECUTOR, NEVER LOST A CASE

PROSECUTOR, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR

TREY GOWDY IS WITH US.

ALL RIGHT, YOU WATCH THIS.

I THINK I KNOW THE FEDERAL RULES

OF EVIDENCE, CORRECT ME,

COUNSELOR, IF I'M WRONG HERE BUT

THEY DON'T ALLOW HEARSAY

WITNESSES, AND SHORT OF AN

EXPERT WITNESS OR TWO, I ASSUME

OPINION WITNESSES WILL NOT BE

WARRANTED IN A SENATE TRIAL

PROVIDED OVER BY THE CHIEF

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.

>> YEAH, I DON'T THINK THE

SENATORS CARE ABOUT THE LAW

PROFESSORS TO THE EXTENT THEY

CAN STAY AWAKE WHILE THREE LAW

PROFESSORS TESTIFY.

I DON'T THINK THEY CARE ABOUT

WHETHER OR NOT THOSE THREE LAW

PROFESSORS THINK THIS PRESIDENT

SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE.

HEARSAY OR NEARLY IS NOT

ADMISSIBLE.

THERE ARE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS.

WE WERE TALKING ABOUT A JUST THE

OTHER NIGHT ON THE PHONE.

YOU CAN GET CERTAIN HEARSAY IN.

BUT THE RECORD IS ALREADY

COMPLETE.

THEY'VE CALLED ALL THEIR

WITNESSES.

IRONIC ENOUGH, THE HOUSE

JUDICIARY DIDN'T CALL A SINGLE

SOLITARY FACT WITNESS.

THEY CALLED MORE FACT WITNESSES

FOR THE WATERGATE IMPEACHMENT

THAN THEY DID FOR THE TRUMP

IMPEACHMENT.

THE RECORD IS ALREADY AND, IT'S

FULL.

LET'S VOTE.

SEND IT TO THE JURY AND LET'S

VOTE.

>> Sean: I ACTUALLY COULD BE

PERSUADED EITHER WAY IN THAT I

ACTUALLY THINK THESE PEOPLE ARE

SO NUTS THAT, LET THE HOUSE

REPRESENTATIVE, WHOEVER THEY

APPOINT, LET THEM DO WHATEVER

THEY WANT TO DO.

THEN ONCE THEY HAVE THE VOTES,

THE 51 VOTES I WOULD ASSUME,

CALL THE ROLL, GET IT OUT OF

THERE.

BUT THEN INVESTIGATE THE

WHISTLE-BLOWER.

THEN THE CONGENITAL LIAR

SCHIFF.

THEN HUNTER AND JOE.

WE REALLY CARE ABOUT WITS AND

PROSES," THAN JOE IS RIGHT THERE

>> I TELL CLIENTS, YOU CAN SAY

WHATEVER YOU WANT AFTER THE

TRIAL.

YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT

THE JUDGE, THE POLICE, YOU WANT

TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT ANYONE,

BUT WAIT UNTIL THE VERDICT IS

IN.

THE PRESIDENT IS NOT GOING TO BE

REMOVED FROM OFFICE OR CONVICTED

ON THESE ARTICLES, SO MY ADVICE

ADVICES GET EQUATED AND THEN YOU

CAN SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT TO THE

DEMOCRATS AND THE MEDIA.

AS IF THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT

THINGS.

>> Sean: DO YOU BELIEVE HUNTER

AND JOE, QUID PRO QUO JOE, AND

THE CONGENITAL LIAR SCHIFF, THE

CONTACT THAT HIS OFFICE LIKELY

HAD WITH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER,

NONWHISTLE-BLOWER, HEARSAY

WHISTLE-BLOWER.

WHISTLE-BLOWER,

NONWHISTLE-BLOWER.

THEY SHOULD ALL BE INVESTIGATED

AND THERE ARE OTHER MEANS OF

DOING THAT SHORT OF THE

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL CONFINES.

>> I CAN'T THINK OF A WORSE WAY

TO INVESTIGATE SOMETHING THAN TO

HAVE CONGRESS DO IT.

THE HOUSE HAS AN ETHICS

COMMITTEE.

IF THEY WANT TO BRING ADAM UP

FOR THAT RIDICULOUS PARODY --

>> Sean: HE MIGHT HAVE

IMMUNITY BUT HIS STAFF WOULDN'T.

>> YEAH, I MEAN QUITE CANDIDLY,

I DON'T SEE LINDSAY DOING THAT.

IF THERE ARE MISREPRESENTATIONS

MADE, WELL, YOU'VE TALKED TO HIM

MORE RECENTLY THAN I HAVE, BUT I

THINK ONCE THE PRESIDENT IS

FOUND NOT GUILTY, ACQUITTED, THE

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEP

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEE

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEI

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEE

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THET

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEH

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THES

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THET

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEE

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEB

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEG

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THEE

ATTENTION TURNS TO 2020 AND THET

BULLY PULPIT IN THE WORLD.

IF HE WANTS TO MAKE A POINT,

MAKE IT, BUT MAKE IT AS SOMEONE

WHO HAS BEEN ACQUITTED ON TWO

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.

>> Sean: LET ME ASK YOU ONE

MORE THING --

>> WE ARE GOING TO WIN RIGHT

NOW.

DON'T MESS IT UP.

>> Sean: I AGREE WITH THAT.

LAST QUESTION.

YOU HEAR JOE BIDEN SAYING,

YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE BILLION

DOLLARS UNLESS YOU FIRE THE

PROSECUTOR.

HE KNEW THAT THE PROSECUTOR HE

WANTED TO FIRE WAS INVESTIGATING

HIS ZERO EXPERIENCE SON THAT IS

GETTING PAID MILLIONS.

THAT SOUND LIKE A POTENTIAL

CRIME TO YOU, SIR?

>> I WOULD NEED TO KNOW MORE

ABOUT IT.

BUT I WOULD ALSO TELL YOU THIS,

I HAVE A TON OF CONFIDENCE IN

BILL BARR AND IF THERE IS A

FACTUAL PREDICATE AND WHAT WE

LEARN FROM HORWITZ IS THAT

FACTUAL PREDICATE DOESN'T HAVE

TO BE TOO HIGH TO INVESTIGATE

SOMETHING.

IF THERE IS A FACTUAL PREDICATE,

LET THE PROFESSIONALS DO IT.

I JUST DON'T THINK CONGRESS HAS

ACQUITTED ITSELF WELL SINCE I'VE

BEEN FOLLOWING IT WHEN IT COMES

TO SERIOUSLY INVESTIGATING --

LET THE PROFESSIONALS DO IT IF

THERE IS A PREDICATE FOR DOING

SO.

>> Sean: BY THE WAY, I KNOW

FOR A SHORT TIME YOU WEREN'T A

FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR.

I AM ADVOCATING THE FULL,

COMPLETE REINSTATEMENT AT A

RAISE FOR YOU.