Subtitles section Play video
[NON-ENGLISH SPEECH] Welcome to the Ministry of Health.
And thank you for including our sign language interpreter
in your picture.
So as you may be aware, the second case of COVID-19
is confirmed in a New Zealand citizen.
This is a woman in her 30s recently returned to Auckland
from northern Italy.
The results of the tests were formally
notified to the ministry at about 6 o'clock last evening.
At that point, health authorities
began with, of course, notifying the woman and her family
and initiating a range of processes,
in particular contact tracing.
So although we have our second case of COVID-19,
what I can say is with continued vigilance,
the chance of widespread community outbreak
is expected to remain low.
So the woman confirmed with COVID-19
is in self-isolation in her home with appropriate clinical
support from public health and district health board staff.
Self-isolation at home is well recognized by the World Health
Organization as an appropriate response for people
with mild to moderate symptoms.
She does not require hospital-level care.
The woman's immediate household contacts
are with her in self-isolation as a precautionary measure.
I should say that the woman's partner has also displayed
symptoms and is being tested.
Public health officials last night
began tracing the woman's other close and casual contacts
to ensure appropriate protection measures are in place.
Now the flight on which the woman returned to New Zealand
was from Singapore to Auckland.
This was an Air New Zealand flight on the 25th of February.
It was flight NZ0283 Singapore to Auckland.
So in addition to proactive contact tracing
of close contacts on this flight by public health staff,
contact will also be made with everyone
on the flight to ensure they have relevant information.
And a reminder-- close contacts on a flight
are the people who were in the same row as the case, two rows
in front, and two rows behind.
Anyone who was on this flight and is concerned or would
like information should contact the Healthline number
0800-358-5453.
The woman who has now tested positive for coronavirus
also took two domestic flights on the 2nd of March Air New
Zealand flight NZ5013 Auckland to Palmerston North
and, on the same day, the 2nd of March NZ8114 Palmerston
North to Auckland.
So in addition to proactive tracing
of close contacts on that flight,
or those two flights by public health staff,
contact will also be made for everyone
on the flight to provide relevant information.
And we are working very closely with Air New Zealand
to get in touch with the people who were on those two flights
as well as the international flight, which as I said,
was also an Air New Zealand flight.
Once again, a reminder for all of those flights--
close contacts are people who were
in the same row as the case and the two rows in front
and two behind.
Anyone concerned who was on the two domestic flights
is welcome to also get in touch with Healthline 0800-358-5453.
Contact is also being made with the two medical centers where
the woman sought advice and treatment to determine if there
is any risk to staff or other people
who may have been at the center at that time.
This is a standard part of contact tracing.
And appropriate contact tracing and action
will be taken as required by the public health unit.
Two schools have also been notified
about the positive test as there as a family member
at each of those schools.
After careful consideration, and in discussion
with the family and the schools, we
are telling you that those schools are Westlake Boys
and Westlake Girls High Schools.
The family members-- and this is very important, please--
the family members who attend these schools
are not symptomatic and are now at home in isolation.
They did not travel to Italy.
They are both well.
And they are both being monitored.
The ministries of education and health
will work together to provide the schools
with appropriate advice and support.
The ministries also want to emphasize,
and I will as well, that contacts
of [INAUDIBLE] contacts are not at risk,
recalling neither of these two family members are symptomatic.
And I do want to quote from the comments in the speech
from the director general of the World Health Organization
overnight, in which he compared COVID-19 with influenza.
And this is very important.
Both COVID-19 and influenza cause respiratory disease
and spread in the same way via small droplets of fluid
from the nose and the mouth of someone who is sick.
However, there are some important differences
between the two.
First, COVID-19 does not transmit
as efficiently as influenza from the data we have so far.
With influenza, people who are infected, but not yet sick,
are major drivers of transmission,
which does not appear to be the case for COVID-19.
And that's very pertinent to this particular situation.
Evidence from China is that only 1% of reported cases
do not have symptoms.
And most of those cases develop symptoms within two days.
Just to reiterate, contacts of contacts are not at risk.
In closing, I want to say that this is a Kiwi family that
has been affected by a virus that is
part of a worldwide outbreak.
What they need is support and understanding.
And our task is to ensure they have all the support
and health care they need.
And just a reminder to anybody who
has traveled to China, or Iran, northern Italy, and South
Korea--
in the last 14 days, they should be in self-isolation
and registered with Healthline.
Thank you very much.
And I'm open to questions.
[INAUDIBLE] worried are you that this woman
traveled so far and wide in New Zealand carrying all this.
I am interested in identifying all
the close and casual contexts and ensuring
that we put in place the public health measures.
What I should say is that the immediate circle of family
and close friends, who have been followed up with public health
and are now in self isolation, is small.
The woman has not been feeling well.
Yes, she traveled to Palmerston North and back.
And that is the focus of our-- if it's a contact tracing
on those flights.
However, this is exactly the sort
of contact tracing we would expect to do
and are geared up to do and is well underway now.
[INAUDIBLE] day-to-day movements,
like supermarkets, dairies.
Are you tracing that back?
Or are you [INAUDIBLE].
I don't have detail.
What I can say is that she has been feeling unwell
and has been largely at home and because she
has been feeling unwell.
So just to clarify, is the Ministry
of Health not aware where else this woman has
been other than those domestic flights and those [INAUDIBLE]
[? centers? ?] You don't know if she had been shopping
[INAUDIBLE] anywhere else?
The public health unit was in contact
from early on last evening and has been in contact
a number of times since.
And they have a detailed understanding
of the movements of the case.
And they will be assessing the risk of
and ensuring that any potential for close or casual contacts
is appropriately traced.
I don't have the detail.
But the people who are doing that work
in regional public health service do have their detail.
Was this woman unwell prior to coming to New Zealand
or showed any symptoms at all on their flights
from Italy [INAUDIBLE] and New Zealand?
She developed symptoms once she had arrived in New Zealand.
OK, so she had no apparent symptoms [INAUDIBLE]..
Correct.
Had her partner traveled to Italy as well?
Yes, her partner had been with her initially as well.
[INAUDIBLE]
But are you worried [INAUDIBLE]?
Are you worried about [INAUDIBLE]..
Oh, I'm not worried.
What I am concerned is that we get on
and do the appropriate contact tracing and put in place
the appropriate public health measures.
In terms of the schools, anyone else
being isolated or being monitored
between teachers, [INAUDIBLE],, other peoples [INAUDIBLE]??
No, just to reiterate, the children
who attend each of those schools are not symptomatic.
And they are now in self-isolation at home.
Given that there's person-to-person contraction
in now Australia.
Are you saying that that's not possible with [INAUDIBLE]??
Yes, it is possible.
And in fact, interestingly, some of you
may have seen the report that WHO did on the Joint Mission,
the nine-day joint mission, that WHO
did to China between the 16th and 24th of February.
And there's a couple of interesting bits of--
well, there's a lot of interesting information.
And I can read it to you.
One of the important points in that is in China,
human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 virus
is largely occurring in families.
Hence, of course, our isolation of the families.
However, another very relevant point
here is that data on individuals 18 years and under
suggest there is a relatively low attack rate in this age
group--
2.4% of all reported cases.
Now realize it's quite a few numbers to get.
But also even in those families where there is transmission,
it's less than 10% of family members who then become
symptomatic or get the virus.
And that was found through this exhaustive look at the data
from China, which, as we know, has
had the outbreak the longest and has
the largest number of cases.
And have you been tracking the partner's movements as well?
[INAUDIBLE]?
Yes, that's right.
There will be absolutely part of the contact tracing.
And what I can say is there's this very, very strong overlap
of the contacts for both the person and their partner.
Just in terms of [INAUDIBLE],, how do you
know [INAUDIBLE] day-to-day [INAUDIBLE] supermarket
[INAUDIBLE] to the [? parts ?] [INAUDIBLE]..
How detailed is it?
Very detailed-- so the Auckland Regional Public Health
Service gets a day-by-day, movement-by-movement
description and then does an assessment of,
in particular, where there is any potential
for close contact.
And I've talked about the settings
that we are actively following up in the first instance--
or the public health unit is-- the flights, of course,
as well as the medical centers that were visited.
Do you [INAUDIBLE] of being in [INAUDIBLE]..
For example, Palmerston North.
Was it for a conference sort of thing or any [INAUDIBLE]..
No, it wasn't.
And as I say, the person's been feeling unwell.
And so they haven't been doing much outdoor activity
outside the house.
Your question is?
[INAUDIBLE]
How many tests did it take to get to this positive result?
So the positive result was on a swab
that was taken by a general practitioner on Monday.
And we got the result like yesterday, Tuesday.
The first test.
That's correct.
Was any consideration given to closing the schools?
No, that's not necessary.
And as I say, just to reiterate, the students,
one in each school, are not symptomatic.
And as I've outlined, there's very clear data from China
that people who don't have symptoms
are not ones who spread the virus.
The virus is spread through droplets spread
by coughing and sneezing.
What part of the plane was this woman sitting on
on that international flight?
Yeah, I don't have the details about the raw numbers.
But Air New Zealand, who is working closely
with Healthline, does.
And so if anyone calls Healthline,
they will be able to be told whether or not
they are potentially a close contact or a casual contact.
And when does the husband get his results back?
We're expecting those results later today.
And we know there's a high level of interest.
So we will, of course, report that result,
whether it's positive or negative.
Do you have a general idea of how many
people may have come into close contact with the woman?
Do I have a general idea?
It's a relatively small number of family and friend close
contacts.
And on the planes, I don't know what
the aircraft is that comes back from Singapore to Auckland.
But if it's a Boeing 777, it's something
around between 30 and 40 people, if all the seats are occupied.
Given that [INAUDIBLE] may have just [INAUDIBLE] since then.
I mean, it could be hundreds of people [INAUDIBLE]..
Idea of how many that might be?
So just to reiterate, close contact
is within a meter for more than 15 minutes.
So and as I pointed out, the data from China
really quite helpful here because they
show that most transmission is occurring in families.
In other words, people who are in close
contact with each other for periods of time,
quite long periods of time.
There's a feeling in the community
that we're over blind, that it's a [INAUDIBLE]..
I don't think so at all.
I think we've been very alert and very
responsive and flexible in our response right from the start.
There are no prizes for under doing our response here.
And you can see that other countries around the world
are also ramping up very significant responses
to this threat.
Can you just give us a quick recap?
How many cases have you got?
How many suspected cases [INAUDIBLE]??
So we have the two cases confirmed, the one last Friday
and the one I've just announced today.
There is testing underway at all times on a number of samples.
So there have been over 160 samples tested.
I don't know exactly how many are underway just
at the moment.
Testing is ongoing.
The other thing I'd like to point out
is that we convened urgently our technical advisory group
this morning by teleconference, just
to give us further advice on the case definition.
So we're looking through the advice we've heard from them.
And we'll be able to inform our ministers this afternoon
when we meet with them.
Compared to human-to-human transmission here,
how long would it take to get to its peak [INAUDIBLE]
worse stage?
Look, I couldn't comment.
But we can look at different countries
and see both what happened in countries like China
as well as other countries with big outbreaks.
But most pertinent, of course, is
to look at countries like Australia,
where they have had sporadic cases, and the fact
that routine and good public health measures have contained
any further onward spread.
And that's exactly what we're doing in this case.
Can you tell us what measures [INAUDIBLE] Auckland?
So the airports themselves won't need
to take any additional measures because as you would recognize,
people will move through the airports fairly quickly.
Again, the key issue here is about ensuring
that close contacts, or potential close contacts,
are traced and followed up.
And you'll also be aware that the airports and aircraft
have very regular and rigid cleaning regimes.
So we basically, given that information of close contact,
you're feeling confident in the people outside
of those [INAUDIBLE] and her close family and friends
[INAUDIBLE] outside [INAUDIBLE] some of them really are
[INAUDIBLE].
Are very, very low.
However, they are what we call casual contacts.
So it's not zero.
And therefore it's important those people
are aware of the situation and are
able to respond very quickly if they do develop
symptoms and call Healthline.
And that's the purpose of contacting those people.
Quite a circle of people is quite [INAUDIBLE]..
The circle of people, in terms of immediate family
and friends, that the case has been
in contact with since coming back to New Zealand is small.
What's the plan for the government staff
in terms of coming to work if we do get to an outbreak scenario?
Well, we're a long way off that.
However, if you look at our New Zealand pandemic plan--
and I know there's been quite a lot of interest in this
because both the UK and Australia have talked about,
or there's been talk about, rather, expensive measures.
These are all detailed as potential measures
in our pandemic plan.
And of course, they are informed by the
what is happening at that point in time.
It may be that first of all, you would
have staff who are unwell and away from work anyway.
But one of the measures that government agencies can take
is his staff work from home.
And that's one of the things that everyone
is looking at every government agency as part
of their business continuity planning right at this point
in time.
Is that the only option that we have?
Or are there other options other than working from home?
For government staff or for?
For government staff.
Well, of course, it depends what happens with the outbreak.
It may well be that people may need to stay home.
For example, one of the actions that's possible,
and we've seen this happen in Japan,
is that you could close schools.
Now if that happens, people generally
would need to stay home to look after their children.
So one has to be adaptable and flexible
and consider all the options as the situation unfolds.
Fortunately, we are still early on.
We are keep it out.
Stamp it out.
And our actions, with respect to this case today,
are very much focused on that.
One more question, please.
Do you have any response to the reports
about people feel unwell [INAUDIBLE] of those symptoms?
Are we taking a precautionary approach [? in the New ?]
[? Zealand case ?] [INAUDIBLE].
So two comments to make there-- first of all,
we've done over 160 tests, and over two a positive-- only two
are positive.
So it seems to me that that's about right.
We should be testing more than our positive.
It means we are testing people who may not quite
fit the case definition.
But there is enough suspicion.
And secondly, at the media standup yesterday,
we talked about the fact that while we
are guided by the case definition,
and contrary to some commentary, it is not rigid.
It is also applied with the clinical judgment
of the clinician and in discussion
with an infectious diseases specialist
to make sure that the right people are being tested.
If there's any doubt--
and we saw this with the first case
where there was a high level of clinical suspicion--
if there's any doubt, the clinicians will test.
There was a question at the back.
And that's the last one, please.
We potentially might be [INAUDIBLE]
contact with children's [INAUDIBLE]??
I've given you all the information [INAUDIBLE]
[? this ?] person.
And I've seen several times that this person
has had a small group of family and friend contacts.
And I stand by that comment.
Thank you very much.
And we'll keep you well informed about what's
happening with this case and other matters.
Thank you.
[? Thank you, ?] [INAUDIBLE].