Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • I am here under oath to answer

  • the committee's questions truthfully

  • and to offer the American people what

  • I know about President Trump

  • Michael Cohen is a guy who is going to

  • prison in two months for lying

  • to Congress.

  • I don't believe that Michael Cohen is capable

  • of telling the truth.

  • You're a pathological liar.

  • I have lied.

  • But I am not a liar.

  • Michael Cohen's credibility was on trial

  • during his momentous hearing.

  • His testimony if believed could have

  • major implications to the Trump presidency.

  • He's only been threatened by the truth.

  • So how do we ourselves decide this proven

  • liar is telling the truth?

  • You can't. This is Professor

  • and author David Smith.

  • He literally wrote the book on lying.

  • I write on this kinda $%%$ all the time here.

  • So we decided to ask him how can we know for certain

  • if Cohen is telling the truth.

  • There is no objective foolproof way of

  • telling whether someone is lying

  • or not,

  • especially someone who's skilled in the art of impression

  • management by his own admission Michael

  • Cohen has lied for Donald Trump

  • for ten years.

  • He knows how to handle

  • impression management.

  • And someone very skilled in this craft could easily

  • pass say a polygraph test

  • or body language checks polygraph

  • detects stress

  • it doesn't detect lies.

  • There's no real science of body

  • language. Someone who seems calm

  • self-possessed and self-assured may

  • just be a very very good liar.

  • We can't place our

  • hopes in science delivering

  • a foolproof way of determining

  • whether or not someone is telling the truth.

  • So how do we ever know who's telling

  • the truth who's not?

  • Their word just isn't good enough.

  • We need evidence we need corroboration,

  • we need documentation.

  • Luckily for Cohen There's a lot of documentation

  • and providing the committee today

  • with several documents a copy of the

  • check Mr Trump wrote from his personal

  • bank account. Copies of financial statements

  • and copies of letters I wrote at Mr.

  • Trump's direction.

  • But even hard evidence can also be open to

  • interpretation scrutiny

  • and reasonable doubt.

  • Obviously Mr. Chairman,

  • the witnesses may produce documents suggest

  • incriminates the president.

  • Yet he lies to banks all of those

  • lies were done on fraudulent documents

  • documents that he

  • forged.

  • Nothing he says or produces has any

  • credibility.

  • Even something as objective as an audio recording

  • is subject to reasonable doubt,

  • making people question what they're hearing

  • and what they're seeing.

  • The fact is the president does bring up cash

  • but he says don't pay

  • with cash! Listen to the tape.

  • It says cash.

  • We live in a world where spin

  • and the media is pervasive people find

  • it difficult to know what to believe.

  • We are in search of the truth.

  • The president has made many statements of his own

  • and now the American people have a right

  • to hear the other side.

  • They can watch Mr. Cohen's testimony

  • and make their own judgment.

  • It turns out that judging for ourselves may

  • maybe the worst way to find the truth.

  • So some people think just go

  • with your gut.

  • Unfortunately that's a very treacherous

  • way of determining whether someone

  • is lying or not because it plays right into

  • confirmation bias.

  • Confirmation bias is the tendency to interpret

  • evidence as confirmation of one's

  • existing beliefs.

  • So if you're the sort of person who wants

  • to see Donald Trump taken down

  • you're going to naturally be inclined

  • to give Michael Cohen

  • the benefit of the doubt.

  • Despite his track record.

  • By the same token if you're a fan

  • of Donald Trump then you

  • are going to be inclined to be very very

  • suspicious of the truthfulness

  • of Cohen's claims.

  • This force is so strong that we'll believe

  • just about anything to enforce our worldview

  • will even lie to ourselves.

  • And there may be no better example of this than

  • Cohen's testimony.

  • Replublican members of Congress used their time to discredit Cohen

  • based on his history of deception.

  • There's no truth with you whatsoever.

  • That's why.

  • That's important to you to look up here

  • and look at the old adage that our moms taught us-

  • liar liar pants on fire.

  • No one should ever listen you

  • and give you any credibility.

  • And Democrats thanked Cohen speaking the

  • truth regarding Trump.

  • You want to talk about an agenda?

  • My friends on the other side of the aisle refuse

  • to bring any of these people up before the committee.

  • So today for the first day we have

  • one witness who voluntarily

  • is coming forward to testify.

  • Your side ran away from the truth.

  • And were trying to bring it to the American people

  • when.

  • Our precious world views are under threat.

  • It's so easy for us to lie to

  • ourselves.

  • To form a false picture.

  • To let our biases take over.

  • As human beings were natural born liars.

  • We're all biased we're all self-serving we

  • all deceive ourselves

  • and only way that we can really guard

  • against this is to understand

  • that we are all vulnerable to self-deception.

  • The entire Trump presidency is on the line

  • with Cohen's testimony.

  • And regardless of his veracity it looks like this

  • hearing has done little more than push two opposing

  • worldviews deeper into the sand.

I am here under oath to answer

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

B1

如何判斷某人是否在撒謊 (How to Tell If Someone Is Lying)

  • 9 0
    林宜悉 posted on 2021/01/14
Video vocabulary